TODOS 2016 Conference 1 Ensuring Equity and Excellence in Mathematics for All June 23 - June 25 Scottsdale Plaza Resort Phoenix Metro Area, Arizona



Similar documents
CASL/CECA 2015 Conference Call for Presenters

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

Arkansas Teaching Standards

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

B.A. in Education Specialization: Early Childhood Education (P-3) Student Handbook

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

1. Candidates understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction as follows:

Curriculum and Instruction

Rubric for Evaluating NC s School Counselors +

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Orange County Small Learning Communities Site Implementation Checklist

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

2015 NCCEP/GEAR UP Annual Conference Call for Presentations Submission Guidelines

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION OPENS November 1, 2015 (

Standards for School Counseling

Name: School: School Year: Evaluator: District: Date Completed: Evaluator s Title:

Literacy Education. Master of Science in Education: Program Overview. Program Highlights

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

Core Qualities For Successful Early Childhood Education Programs. Overview

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

Endorsement. English as a Second Language P KAR 2:010. Kentucky teaching certificates. September 2008

Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Principal Endorsement Program Course Sequence and Descriptions

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

SECTION 5: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

WORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN

LANG 557 Capstone Paper . Purpose: Format: Content: introduction view of language

National Middle School Association. Call for Presentations. 33 rd Annual Conference & Exhibit

Course Report for EDI Meth/Strategies of Sec Tchng

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Ferndale Area School District. ESL Program and Guidelines

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

La Joya ISD Office of Bilingual/ESL Education

Educational Technology

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

***Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft*** International Society for Technology In Education (ISTE) Technology Coach Program Standards

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

Ella Cline Shear School of Education

Executive Leadership for Successful Schools

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

InTASC. Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for State Dialogue

Teaching Math to English Language Learners

Louisiana Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies 2012

Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

Literacy Specialist Endorsement

SECONDARY EDUCATION. College of Education and Public Policy Bachelor of Science in Education (B.S. Ed.) with Initial Teacher Licensure.

... and. Uses data to help schools identify needs for prevention and intervention programs.

Riley College of Education and Leadership Ed.D. Administrator Leadership Student Performance on Program Major Assessments

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Five 3-credit courses will be taught by faculty across campus:

EXPEDITIONARY LEARNING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE. Expeditionary Learning 2010

Conference April 10 & 11, 2015 Scottsdale, Arizona

Indiana s Department of Education STEM Education Implementation Rubric

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

ESOL Endorsement Program

MATTC Course Descriptions

American Indian College Fund & Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Leadership Fellowship Program In Science, Mathematics and Engineering

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT ALABAMA COLLEGE AND CAREER STANDARDS

Library Information Specialist [27.450]

The Arizona Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Sponsorship Prospectus 2015

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

The University of Mississippi School of Education

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RULES GOVERNING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT September 6, 2014

Elementary Education: Teacher Leadership Track

Learning. Framework for Teaching and

Ohio Standards for School Counselors

A New Vision for School Counseling. Standard 1: School Counselors Demonstrate Leadership, Advocacy, and Collaboration

English Language Learners Walk Through and Program Review Tool

The STEM Immersion Matrix for Schools and Districts

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

Early Childhood Special Education

Pennsylvania s ESL Requirements; Expectations Under Law. Presented by: Jamie McFadden ESL Teacher Saucon Valley School District

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Principal Practice Observation Tool

LITERACY. Paying Attention to. Six Foundational Principles for Improvement in Literacy, K 12

NEW CREDENTIAL PROGRAM PROPOSAL. 1. Title: Education Specialist Credential: Mild to Moderate Disabilities

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Questions and Answers Regarding English Language Learners (ELLs) with Disabilities. Volume 10

Own Research That Leads to Action

Urban Education: School, Student, Family, Community Influences on Student Learning

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

Transcription:

TODOS 2016 Conference 1 Ensuring Equity and Excellence in Mathematics for All June 23 - June 25 Scottsdale Plaza Resort Phoenix Metro Area, Arizona Call for Proposals The Program Committee for the TODOS 2016 Conference seeks proposals from educators interested in contributing to this professional learning experience. Questions may be addressed to the Program Chair, Sylvia Celedón- Pattichis (2016programchair@todos- math.org). Deadline for submitting Proposals: September 30, 2015. TODOS Conference Program Overview The Program Committee for TODOS 2016, our second national conference, seeks proposals to address the theme: Ensuring Equity and Excellence in Mathematics for ALL. We identified six topics of interest that will help attendees create positive changes in their classrooms and/or communities. We seek proposals that align with one or more of the topics below: 1. Integrating Language, Literacy, and Culture in Mathematics 2. Building on Student, Family, and Community Strengths 3. Framing Mathematics Education through the Lens of Social Justice 4. Implementing Rigorous Mathematics Standards- Based Curriculum 5. Assessing Students Mathematical Thinking through Formative Assessment 6. Developing Leaders to Achieve Equity and Excellence in Mathematics The conference will include a variety of session types, including both invited and peer- reviewed, that range in length and format. Throughout the conference, there will be many opportunities to discuss ideas from the sessions, consider how we move beyond awareness, and enact changes in our settings that address equity, access, and achievement for all. With these goals in mind, we welcome proposals from a wide range of educators and offer to assist teachers, researchers, or others who might be new to developing proposals, preparing presentations, or speaking at conferences. The option to work with a mentor for preparing the 1 TODOS 2016 conference is co- sponsored by NSF- funded Arizona Master Teachers of Mathematics (AZ- MTM), award #1035330, administered by the Department of Mathematics at The University of Arizona. 1

presentation appears on the Proposal Form. If you would like mentoring during proposal development, please contact the Program Chair. CHECKLIST for Preparing a Proposal Review TODOS Mission and Goals (See section below). Identify a Conference Topic(s) of Interest that you intend to address. Select Focus Questions your presentation will address. Determine the Session Type (Investigate or Innovate). Go to the TODOS 2016 Speaker Proposal at http://tinyurl.com/qetdhdh. Complete the Proposal Form, based on your theme, focus questions, and session type. Submit Proposal Application by September 30, 2015. [Note: after submitting the Proposal Form, you will receive a Confirmation e- mail message containing your username, password. You can return to http://tinyurl.com/qetdhdh and edit your submitted proposal at any time before the September 30 deadline. Please keep the e- mail message.] For additional information on the TODOS 2016 Conference, go to http://www.todos- math.org/todos- 2016. Proposal Review Criteria Your proposed session will be evaluated based on the following: Quality: o Does the proposal clearly communicate what will happen during the session? o Does the proposal describe how the participants will be engaged? o Are the proposal title and description well written? Relevance: o Does the proposed session address the conference theme? o Does the proposed session address TODOS Mission and Goals? o Will the proposed session entice participation of the audience? Impact: o Will the session take participants beyond awareness? o Will the session help participants enact changes in their settings that address equity, access, and achievement in mathematics for all? o Does the session have the potential to impact diverse learners? 2

TODOS: Mission and Goals The mission of TODOS: Mathematics for ALL is to advocate for equity and high quality mathematics education for all students in particular, Latina/o students. Five goals define the activities and products of TODOS: Mathematics for ALL: 1. To advance educators knowledge and ability that leads to implementing an equitable, rigorous, and coherent mathematics program that incorporates the role language and culture play in teaching and learning mathematics. 2. To develop and support educational leaders who continue to carry out the mission of TODOS. 3. To generate and disseminate knowledge about equitable and high quality mathematics education. 4. To inform the public and influence educational policies in ways that enable students to become mathematically proficient in order to enhance college and career readiness. 5. To inform families about educational policies and learning strategies that will enable their children to become mathematically proficient. Conference Topics of Interest Proposals must identify at least one topic (and specific focus questions). Note: The reference to ALL may be interpreted to mean for a particular subgroup of students (e.g., Native American students, students with disabilities, ELLs, etc.) or for addressing a diverse classroom with a range of learners. Topic #1: Integrating Language, Literacy, and Culture in Mathematics Focus Questions for Topic #1: 1. What are effective practices in integrating writing, listening, speaking, and reading in the teaching of mathematics to support the success of ALL students? 2. What approaches can mathematics teachers use to ensure cultural differences are central to the classroom community? 3. What strategies support discussing and negotiating multiple meanings associated with language and culture? 4. From your experience teaching culturally and linguistically diverse learners, what practices have been effective for integrating language, literacy, culture, and mathematics? Topic #2: Building on Student, Family, and Community Strengths Focus Questions for Topic #2: 1. How do teachers build on the strengths students bring to mathematics classrooms that help them experience success and high achievement? 3

2. From your experience working with diverse families and communities, what innovative strategies engage students, their families, and their communities in the learning and doing of mathematics? 3. How do educators sustain projects and initiatives that engage families and communities in mathematics learning? 4. How do you establish and maintain effective classroom communities that build on the student, family, and community strengths? Topic #3: Framing Mathematics Education through the Lens of Social Justice Focus Questions for Topic #3: 1. How do you define social justice in mathematics teaching and learning? 2. How do educators ensure that social justice mathematics tasks maintain a high level of cognitive demand? 3. How do educators implement social justice topics so that mathematics is the driving force behind the conclusions that students reach? 4. How do you connect social justice topics to the student populations with whom you are working? Topic #4: Implementing Rigorous Mathematics Standards-Based Curriculum Focus Questions for Topic #4: 1. How do educators provide access to cognitively demanding mathematics of grade level standards? 2. How do educators support the learning of mathematics while students develop English as an additional language? 3. How do educators select and enhance mathematical tasks that provide multiple entry points and multimodal ways to approach and represent solutions? 4. What are the characteristics of mathematics curriculum that support ELLs mathematical learning? 5. What resources, including technology, are particularly useful and effective in supporting the learning of ALL? Topic #5: Assessing Students Mathematical Thinking through Formative Assessment Focus Questions for Topic #5: 1. What types of assessment strategies effectively develop productive student mathematical thinking and habits of mind? 2. What strategies are effective for informing instructional decisions that will help teachers address the expectations of standards and meet the needs of ALL? 3. What do teachers do when they encounter culturally biased items on required assessments? 4. How should cultural and other student characteristics be considered when developing equitable methods of formative assessment? 5. From your experience, what types of formative assessments can positively impact mathematical thinking, practices, and processes? 4

6. How do you distinguish between potential language misunderstandings and mathematical misconceptions? Topic #6: Developing Leaders to Achieve Equity and Excellence in Mathematics Focus Questions for Topic #6: 1. What does it mean to take action on equity- based mathematics leadership? 2. What do leaders need to know and be able to do in order to influence improvement in equity and access? 3. How does context, climate, and circumstance influence different leadership development approaches? 4. How do educators use access, achievement, and opportunity data to develop equity- based leaders? 5. How do leaders foster instructional practices and classroom environments that support the achievement of equity and excellence in mathematics? 6. How can or do policies impede, hinder, or improve conditions for diverse student populations? What are advocacy strategies that can influence decision and policy makers to provide better opportunities for ALL students to learn mathematics? 7. How have you prepared teacher leaders who set high expectations for ALL students? 8. How have you increased the number of teachers of color in leadership positions? Session Types All sessions will focus on the Conference Theme, Ensuring Equity and Excellence in Mathematics for ALL. TODOS 2016 will include a rich blend of session types, including invited Keynotes, Ignite, and 2- hour Impact Sessions, as well as the two peer- reviewed session types listed below. Rooms will be set in round tables of 10 with a maximum of 60 participants. We are requesting proposals for the following session types: Innovate (30 minutes): Presenters should prepare short reports on teaching, research, projects, innovations, and other ideas addressing the conference s topics of interest. The program committee will group two or three Innovate sessions in a time slot so that participants have the opportunity to engage with multiple ideas. Presenters should plan a 20- minute presentation of their innovative ideas followed by a 10- minute question and answer period. Investigate (60 and 90 minutes): Presenters should design interactive sessions that engage participants in their exploration of ideas in order to impact their practices and settings. High levels of participation are expected in the 60- and 90- minute sessions so that participants will have opportunities to learn from others and consider implementation in different contexts. Note 1: The lead presenter for each Innovate and Investigate session will receive a discount of 20% on their conference registration. Note 2: Classroom teachers may be eligible for conference support through the NSF- funded Arizona Master Teachers of Mathematics program, administered by the 5

Department of Mathematics at The University of Arizona. Be sure to check YES at the beginning of the Proposal Form if you are a classroom teacher and wish to be considered for support. TODOS 2016 Program Committee Sylvia Celedón- Pattichis, Chair, University of New Mexico Kyndall Brown, California Mathematics Project Kathryn Chval, University of Missouri- Columbia Ed Dickey, University of South Carolina Kathy Eichhorst, Noyce Master Teacher Scholar, Tucson USD M. Alejandra Sorto, Texas State University Melissa Wilburn, Noyce Master Teacher Scholar, Marana USD 6