CDOT Region 6 Communications Study. Bandwidth Analysis Technical Memorandum. Prepared by:



Similar documents
Eastern RTMC.

Communications Master Plan and Implementation Plan Deliverable No. 29

Module 2.1. Page 1 of 10. Slide 1

Appendix A - Cost Estimate Spreadsheet

I-29 Corridor ITS Architecture and Systems Engineering Analysis

The development of this ITS Communications Plan was a joint project of the Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO) and Kansas Department of

ITS Investment Strategy 10-Year Program, FY07-16

Maricopa County Regional Wireless Systems An AZTech White Paper on Wireless Systems Being Used in ITS

STATEWIDE ITS ASSETS 1

2035 Statewide. Transportation Plan. Intelligent Transportation System TECHNICAL REPORT. March 2008 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

The Colorado Traffic Data Warehouse Sharing Traffic Data Across Governmental Agencies

CTS2134 Introduction to Networking. Module 07: Wide Area Networks

High Availability Private Network (HAPN ) Network Upgrade Case Study

SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership

The number LEON COUNTY NG9-1-1, RFP # BC Addendum #3

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Concept of Operations for Arterial Traffic Management

BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT

datacentersites.com Security, Infrastructure Redundancy Tier 3+/Tier 4 Data Center Sites

1.264 Lecture 34. Telecom: Connecting wired LAN, WAN. Next class: Green chapter 17. Exercise due before class

Metropolitan Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Infrastructure 2010 Transportation Management Center

EFFORTS ACCOMPLISHED TO DATE

Commonwealth of Virginia Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer. Transportation Management System Services. CTB Workshop May 15, 2013

Experience Matters...

better broadband Redundancy White Paper

Computer Networks. Definition of LAN. Connection of Network. Key Points of LAN. Lecture 06 Connecting Networks

CPET 581 E-Commerce & Business Technologies. Topics

FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005

Utilization of the 4.9 GHz Band in Transportation and Emergency Response Applications

Statewide Technology Access for Government and Education Network (STAGEnet)

TECHNICAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ITN-DOT-14/ RM TAMPA OPERATIONS CENTER VIDEO SURVEILLANCE/SECURITY ACCESS SYSTEM

Guidelines for Developing Traffic Incident Management Plans for Work Zones

Municipal Operations Monitoring

What s New and What s Next in Cable Wholesale? Monday, March 17, :15-11 a.m.

Business Case for the Brocade Carrier Ethernet IP Solution in a Metro Network

Unique Heavy Infrastructure Site Available Former Alcoa Aluminum Smelter - Badin, North Carolina

Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs

July 2014 Page U-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS


From: HDR Engineering & Oz Engineering Project: AZTech TM Transit Data Integration Concepts of Operation. Date: July 29, 2009 Job No:

Telecommunications, Networks, and Wireless Computing

Understand VLANs, Wired LANs, and Wireless LANs

APPLICANT: LCB Communications LLC. Page 2

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES InternalServicesDepartment

PDX IT/ITS MASTER PLAN

For the Phoenix Metropolitan Area August 2010

Broadband supply. 13 Access to Redevelopment

Fiber Optics: Vision for the I-69 Thumb Region. April 17, 2015

Getting Broadband. FCC Consumer Facts. What Is Broadband?

TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS CENTER (TOC) STRATEGY

QUALITY TRAFFIC INFORMATION

Lake Plaza Center 44 & 134 Union Boulevard Lakewood, CO ±455-33,283 RSF Available For Lease

MARATHON COUNTY TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

THE SMART CITY OF THE FUTURE

ADB/RFP/CGSP/2013/0158. Implementation of High Speed Point-To-Point Clear Channel Link- MPLS Backbone Connectivity

Network Neutrality Statement

John Ragan Director of Product Management. Billy Wise Communications Specialist

ADSL or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. Backbone. Bandwidth. Bit. Bits Per Second or bps

Southern Coastal Cable

Network and Technology. John Schanz Executive Vice President National Engineering and Technology Operations Comcast Cable

the amount of data will grow. It is projected by the industry that utilities will go from moving and managing 7 terabytes of data to 800 terabytes.

DISASTER RECOVERY AND NETWORK REDUNDANCY WHITE PAPER

Systems. Using Ethernet to Create Highly Reliable Wide-Area Security, Access & Monitoring. White Paper Series.

Advanced Transportation Management Systems

ColoTN-HCF-01-RFP Questions

tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas

Mainstreaming Incident Management in Design-Build: The T-REX Experience

Disaster Recovery Design Ehab Ashary University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

10 QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE YOU BUY PHONE SERVICE FOR YOUR BUSINESS SHARE THIS DOCUMENT 1

NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES

2014 Annual Report Company Overview

Network Topologies. Network Topologies

Going Critical. How to Design Advanced Security Networks for the Nation s Infrastructure. w w w. G a r r e t t C o m. C o m

CARRIER MPLS VPN September 2014

ROGERS DELIVERS THE SPEED, POWER AND RELIABILITY OF FIBRE RIGHT TO YOU.

Broadband What is it?

XO Network Evolution Overview. Randolph C. Nicklas CTO & SVP Engineering XO Communications

Temporary Agency List Denver Metro

Network Topology Comparison

Southern Utah Water SCADA Project and Dispelling Myths regarding 900MHz Spread Spectrum Technology:

Campus Network Best Practices: Core and Edge Networks

Oman Broadband Company. 1 st of June 2014

Quick-Starting Your. Regional ITS Architecture Update

Wireless Traffic Management System

How To Continue The State Broadband Initiative

Narrowband and Broadband Access Technologies

Intelligent Transportation Systems Technical Report Summary

Broadband Defined. High-speed internet or communications access

YOUR WHOLESALE PARTNER IN PORTUGAL

FINAL Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Deployment Strategy for the FM Metropolitan Area December 2014 Prepared For Originally Prepared By:

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE DELIVERABLE NO. 2 DRAFT DATA REPORT FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Network+ Guide to Networks 6 th Edition. Chapter 7 Wide Area Networks

c o m m u n i c a t i o n n e t w o r k s

Storage Area Networks (SANs) and iscsi Protocol An Introduction to New Storage Technologies

Computer Networks Vs. Distributed Systems

Ship to Shore Communications Management for MTN Satellite Communications Inc.

Chapter 1 Reading Organizer

Product Overview. Steve Erickson

!"! # " " $$ January 2008

Three Key Design Considerations of IP Video Surveillance Systems

Space Applications for International Development: Commercial Satellite Applications Yesterday, today and tomorrow

Transcription:

CDOT Region 6 Communications Study Analysis Technical Memorandum Prepared by: 1515 Arapahoe St. Suite 500, Tower 1 Denver, CO 80202 303.228.2300 September 22, 2000

CDOT Tech Memo 2 Analysis September 22, 2000 Introduction The CDOT ITS Unit is developing a metrowide communications network to enhance its existing ITS network. The intent this network is to provide a statewide standard for communications for ITS to meet the growing demand for a statewide system. By providing this standard, both new and existing ITS deployments can be designed to tie into the statewide communications network, thus providing the opportunity to share data and video throughout the Denver metro area. The objective this memorandum is to determine the appropriate measures needed to tie the existing and proposed ITS devices to a CDOT facility so that the information can be disseminated to other CDOT information centers and the Traffic Operations Center (TOC). There are five CDOT facilities that can take the incoming information and send it to other facilities. They include: CDOT headquarters, Region 6, Communications Node Building (TMS) #1 and #2, and the TOC. This overall project outlines the necessary actions that will need to be taken to integrate the existing ITS devices throughout the Denver metro area. To properly design a fully integrated ITS network, the bandwidth requirements for each segment must be identified. The bandwidth requirements will determine the necessary equipment needed to connect the ITS devices, and the fiber needed to accommodate the regional network. Assumptions To accurately describe the bandwidth needed to interconnect the existing and proposed devices, assumptions were made about the bandwidth requirements for each device. The assumed bandwidth needed per device is shown in Table 1. These values are conservative to permit future long-term expansion throughout the region. Table 1. Assumed Requirements Per Device Device ATR 28.8 kbps CCTV 10000.0 kbps HOV GATES 28.8 kbps HAR STATION 64.0 kbps HAR SIGN 28.8 kbps RAMP METER 28.8 kbps DMS 28.8 kbps For the purposes this study, all proposed or future equipment was evaluated as if it were existing. This will result in higher bandwidth requirements, giving room for additional growth to new devices as technology in ITS continues to develop. Page 2

Analysis The bandwidth required for each corridor (I-25, I-225, I-70, I-270, US-36, and C-470) was determined from CDOT supplied information including maps, GPS, and other plans and studies. The results each corridor are shown in Table 2. I-25 was broken into three segments (120 th St. to 6 th Ave, 6 th Ave. to Colorado Blvd., and Colorado Blvd. to Lincoln Ave.). Table 2 Corridors In Study Area Segment Segment Description I-25 120th Ave. to 6th Ave. I-25 6 th Ave. to Colorado Blvd. I-25 Colorado Blvd. To Lincoln Ave. 6th Ave Kipling St. to I-25 U.S. 36 Sheridan Blvd. To I-25 C-470 Wadsworth Blvd. To I-25 I-225 I-25 To I-70 I-70 Pecos St. to York St. I-270 I-76 to I-25 CDOT Communication Node Building #2 The CDOT Communications Node Building #2, located at I-25 and 70 th Avenue, will be responsible for collecting the information transmitted along the OC-3 fiber lines running along U.S. 36 and I-270 (as shown in Figure 1). Any future ITS expansions along these corridors will also go through Node Building #2. Node Building #2 will also be the concentration point for any new devices placed along I-25 north I-70, especially those north US-36. Figure 1. CDOT Communication Node Building #2 Coverage Page 3

The U.S. 36 corridor requires approximately 40,288 kbps, or 40.3 Mbps. The breakdown devices along U.S.36 is shown in Table 3. As the U.S. 36 corridor continues to have growth along its frontage, it is expected that additional devices will be installed and the bandwidth requirements will increase proportionately. Table 3 Requirements along U.S. 36 ATR 6 172.8 CCTV 4 40,000 DMS 3 86.4 HOV GATE 1 28.8 Total 40,288 The I-270 segment is relatively new; thus the level monitoring is still being developed. This new segment I-270 allows traffic to go directly from I-70 to U.S. 36. The bandwidth requirement for the I-270 segment is 20,057.6 kbps, as shown in Table 4. Table 4 Requirements along I-270 ATR 2 57.6 CCTV 2 20,000 Total 20,057.6 The devices on the I-76 segment are shown in the bandwidth requirements the I-270 corridor. The existing ITS devices along the north I-25 corridor between I-70 and US-36 use Node Building #1 as the primary concentration point. Node Building #2 was built as a result the HOV Direct Connect project (ITS Special). Node Building #2, therefore, is intended to serve as the concentration point for all future devices placed along I-25 north I-70, including those devices deployed as part the ITS Special project. The bandwidth requirement for the north I-25 segment is 30,028.8 kbps, as shown in Table 5. Table 5 Future Requirements along I-25 CCTV 3 30,000 DMS 1 28.8 Total 30,028.8 Page 4

The total bandwidth required along the corridors that will communicate directly to the CDOT Communication Node Building #2 is 90,374.4 kbps (90.4 Mbps). As the corridor continues to expand, new devices are likely to be placed along I-270 from I-25 to I-70 and along I-76 from I-70 to US-85. The communications along these two corridors will pass through the CDOT Communications Node Building #2. CDOT Communication Node Building #1 The CDOT Communication Node Building #1 will receive information transmitted from new devices placed along I-25 from I-70 to 6 th Avenue, as shown in Figure 2. The devices along I-70 are also included in Node Building #1 s coverage. Figure 2 CDOT Communication Node Building #1 Coverage The bandwidth required to serve the northern portion I-25 is 161,267.2 kbps (161.3 Mbps). The breakdown the devices that will communicate directly with node building #1 is shown in Table 6. Table 6 Requirements along I-25 North ( Communicating Directly to Node Building #1) ATR 26 748.8 CCTV 16 160,000 HOV GATE 6 172.8 DMS 12 345.6 Total 161,267.2 The ITS Special project installed fiber along I-25 to just north the US-36 interchange. New fiber is required north along the corridor to tie in any new devices. Page 5

The I-70 segment included in the coverage Node Building #1 will require a bandwidth 30,144 kbps (30.1 Mbps). The bandwidth requirement will likely increase as the traffic volume continues to rise along the corridor. The bandwidth required by individual devices is shown in Table 7. Table 7 Requirements along I-70 ( Communicating Directly to Node Building #1) ATR 1 28.8 CCTV 3 30,000.0 DMS 4 115.2 Total 30,144.0 Region 6 Maintenance Facility The CDOT Region 6 building will receive the majority the information transmitted from devices along the southern section the network, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 Region 6 Communication Building Coverage The CDOT Region 6 Maintenance Facility will have a dual purpose. The primary purpose is to provide remote maintenance and operations the HOV corridor, including incident monitoring for maintenance purposes and verification the DMS messages and gate status. The secondary purpose is to act as a pass-through for all the data gathered south 6 th Avenue, along I-25, I-225, and C-470, until a full region-wide fiber deployment is completed. The Tier 3 data and video system along these corridors will be placed on the Tier 1 (statewide) system at 2000 South Holly. Data and video Page 6

processing and redistribution this information will be the responsibility the CDOT TOC. The bandwidth for each segment is 61,568 kbps (61.6 Mbps), 172.8 kbps (0.2 Mbps), and 10,460.8 kbps (10.5 Mbps) respectively. The individual devices are shown in Tables 8, 9,10, and 11. Table 8 Requirements along I-25 (6 th Ave. to Colorado Blvd.) ATR 8 230.4 HAR BROADCAST 1 64.0 DMS 1 28.8 Total 323.2 There is currently no fiber optic cable running between 6 th Avenue and Colorado Boulevard. The existing devices between 6 th Ave. and Colorado Blvd. are wireless and telephone connected. These devices can continue to operate with the current connections; however, fiber optic cable will need to be placed along I-25 if future devices are to be connected by fiber optic lines. Table 9 Requirements along I-25 (Colorado Blvd. to Lincoln Ave.) ATR 16 460.8 CCTV 6 60000.0 RAMP METER 12 345.6 DMS 4 115.2 HAR SIGN 1 28.8 HAR STATION 1 64.0 Total 61,014.4 As Douglas County continues to grow, the need for additional devices may become apparent and the bandwidth requirements will increase as ITS elements continue to be deployed south Lincoln Ave. As the ITS development continues in the Denver Metro Area, ramp meters will be installed along the southbound ramps to I-25. As the ramp meters are installed, the Automatic Traffic Recorders will be removed. For the purposes this analysis, the bandwidth for the ATR s is included, as the bandwidth for the future ramp meters will be an equivalent replacement. Page 7

Table 10 Requirements along C-470 (Wadsworth Blvd. To I-25) ATR 2 57.6 RAMP METER 4 115.2 DMS 1 28.8 Total 201.6 The need for additional devices may become apparent as the Highlands Ranch area continues to grow. As development continues along the entire C-470 corridor, the need for additional ITS will need to be addressed. Additional devices and fiber optic cable will eventually be needed along C-470 to the I-70 interchange. Completion the C-470 ITS network to I-70 may reroute the communication from going directly to the Region 6 building to going through the TOC building along 6 th Ave. Table 11 Requirements along I-225 CCTV 2 20,000.0 RAMP METER 13 374.4 DMS 2 57.6 HAR SIGN 1 28.8 Total 20,460.8 Traffic Operations Center The TOC will directly receive the information from the devices along 6 th Avenue as shown in Figure 4. It will also serve as a concentration point for data and video from the other three CDOT facilities. Page 8

Figure 4 Traffic Operations Center Coverage The bandwidth needed to collect the data from devices on 6 th Avenue is 40,288 kbps (40.3 Mbps). Individual devices along 6th Avenue and their respective bandwidths are shown in Table 12. Table 12 Requirements along 6th Avenue ATR 8 230.4 CCTV 4 40,000.0 RAMP METER 1 28.8 DMS 1 28.8 Total 40,288.0 As build-out the fiber optic network continues, deploying a set rings throughout the Denver metropolitan area, the ability for full redundancy throughout the network will be provided. Additionally, the configuration the Tier 1 network (SONET/TDM) will permit the operation center to be located anywhere along any the trunk line routes and still provide the same level operations and control as the current location. Page 9

Conclusions and Recommendations The four CDOT facilities, as previously mentioned, will provide the Denver area with an ITS network which will be able collect and distribute traffic information. Table 13 provides a summary the bandwidth requirements each corridor evaluated in this study. Table 13 Requirements Summary Segment Segment Description Required (Mbps) I-25 120th St. to 6th Ave. 191.3 I-25 6th Ave. to Colorado Blvd. 0.3 I-25 Colorado Blvd. To Lincoln Ave. 61.0 6th Ave Kipling St. to I-25 40.3 U.S. 36 Sheridan Blvd. To I-25 40.3 C-470 Wadsworth Blvd. To I-25 0.2 I-225 I-225 To I-70 20.5 I-70 Pecos St. to York St. 30.1 I-270 I-76 to I-25 20.1 CDOT is in the process identifying a new, permanent location for the traffic operations center. As stated previously, with the network technology being used, the location the building is only limited by access to the trunk fiber ring. Locating the TOC f the main trunk fiber ring may require a connection between the TOC and the trunk line. Page 10