Data Dashboards for School Boards. Educational Management Consultants, Inc. Center for Educational



Similar documents
A Matched Study of Washington State 10th Grade Assessment Scores of Students in Schools Using The Core-Plus Mathematics Program

DATA COACHING WORKSHOP DAY 1 PRESENTED BY SARITA SIQUEIROS THORNBURG, JILL PATNODE & KRISSY SOLTMAN

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

A Policy Action Guide for Washington State s School Directors

Learning-Focused Introduction. Introduction By Dr. Mills

INTEGRATED STUDENT ASSESSMENT & DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - DATA WAREHOUSE RFP #

SLDS Spotlight. SLDS Spotlight: Data Use Through Visualizations and Narratives, March Data Use Through Visualizations and Narratives

Orange County High 201 Selma Road, Orange, VA 22960

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON ITED FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS

New York State Profile

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

Parent and Community Survey

South Dakota DOE Report Card

Transitioning English Language Learners in Massachusetts: An Exploratory Data Review. March 2012

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide

P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Data Collection and Reporting

State of New Jersey

Teacher Education and PreK 18 Collaboration: Assessing Impact on Student Achievement

Instructional Leadership Through Data-driven Decision-making. Action Plan. Student Achievement Need

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ARIZONA. credo.stanford.edu.

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA. credo.stanford.edu

K-12 Education Data Governance and Statewide K-12 Longitudinal Education Data System. Report to the Legislature

CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN INDIANA. credo.stanford.edu

40th Anniversary COSA Seaside Conference. June 19, Shanda Miller, MPA Wendy Kam, MBA Oregon Audits Division

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

COMPARISON OF SEO SCHOLARS AND

74% 68% 47% 54% 33% Staying on Target. ACT Research and Policy. The Importance of Monitoring Student Progress toward College and Career Readiness

West Virginia. Next Steps. Life After Special Education

District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)

Copyright 2013 CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. 1

JUST THE FACTS. Birmingham, Alabama

Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring?

Allen Elementary School

Enhancements to State Reports

Kansas City Area: Dropout Rates Fueling Violent Crime

State of New Jersey

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA. credo.stanford.edu.

Washington State Community Learning Center Program. Final Report to the Legislature

WHO LEAVES TEACHING AND WHERE DO THEY GO? Washington State Teachers

School Accountability Report

Maine High School Graduates: Trends in College-Going, Persistence, and Completion August 2015

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. February 2009

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR

Fulda Independent School District 505

Pearson Inform v4.0 Educators Guide

JUST THE FACTS. Washington

State of the Schools Report Archdiocese of Boston Catholic Schools. June 2014

State of New Jersey

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Ennis ISD

Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School

TEXAS ENGINEERING FOUNDATION Scholarship Application for Graduating Texas High School Seniors

UNH Graduate Education Department

Evaluation of the Seattle Public School s Family Support Program

Participation in Postsecondary Remedial Education

Comparison of Progress Monitoring with Computer Adaptive Tests and Curriculum Based Measures

Migrant Education Program Evaluation Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors. Summer 2012

Transcription:

Data Dashboards for School Boards Debora Boeck Greg Lobdell Educational Management Consultants, Inc. Center for Educational WSSDA Cadre Effectiveness, Inc.

DATA DASHBOARDS FOR SCHOOL BOARDS What gets measured gets done! Tom Peters- In Search of Excellence Washington State School Directors' Association

Data can become a force for improvement by energizing those closest to their work. Mike Schmoker, Results: The Key to Continuous School Improvement

WHAT BOARDS WANT TO KNOW How do we define success? What data should we collect and have routinely presented to the board to measure success, identify trends and monitor progress? Washington State School Directors' Association

WHAT BOARDS WANT TO KNOW In what ways can student learning data at the school district and individual school level data be presented so that we can easily make sense of it? Washington State School Directors' Association

WHAT BOARDS WANT TO KNOW What are the best types of data comparisons that help boards determine the district s challenges and strengths? Washington State School Directors' Association

WHAT BOARDS WANT TO KNOW Based on the data presented, what questions should be asked to get to the root cause of any problem or lack of improvement. Washington State School Directors' Association

WHAT BOARDS WANT TO KNOW Most importantly, how can we view the data to determine board options for addressing issues revealed by the data? Washington State School Directors' Association

Challenge Facing School Boards Challenge: to have a sufficient amount of good data to analyze progress and not too much data that causes the board to get bogged down in minutia and focused away from its priorities. Answer: a consistent way of having data presented to you as a school board - in essence a data dashboard of gauges for key student achievement and district performance indicators. Washington State School Directors' Association

By itself, data has no value. When data is put into a form that is easily understandable, it becomes information. When information is used to guide the decidesions that are in the best interest of students and families we serve, it becomes knowledge. Stan Beckelman, former president, Boeing information Services and board member, Center for Educational Effectiveness

Data Dashboard for School Directors Ideas, Thoughts, and Examples Greg Lobdell Center for Educational Effectiveness greg@effectiveness.org

Center for Educational Effectiveness Field-based research, service, and data-centric tools to support School & District Improvement In WA-- Partnerships with 580 Schools in 115 districts What we do & how we do it varies based on serving districts from 80 students K-12, to districts over 30,000 K-12. The largest WASL Educational Growth repository in the state (WASL growth data (student cohorts) for districts serving 575,000 students) The largest repository of school effectiveness information in the state of Washington (Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools) 48,000 Staff, 146,000 Students, and 57,000 Parents (30% from homes where English is not primary language) Assist all schools & districts in OSPI School, District, & Summit District Improvement programs Schools of Distinction: Active research with the schools demonstrating the highest improvement in the state Active partnerships: OSPI, AWSP, WASA, WSSDA, West-Ed, WSU and UW

4 WASHINGTON SCHOOLS Who We Serve April 2006 WASL Data Combined Reading / Math Level Index 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Poverty All Schools CEE Clients

Today s Dashboard Session: Critical Conversations Identify what data on student and district performance matters most to you. Explore places and means to obtain the most meaningful data. Learn to accurately read and interpret data for your district. Develop a proposed plan for a customized data dashboard for your district.

Pause & Reflect A Data Dashboard is? A Data Dashboard is NOT?

Visual Representation Recognize the skills, backgrounds, and adult learning styles of your board The 15-second test Don t be locked in be dynamic to respond to needs and changes

Tabular Dashboard

Graphical Dashboard

General Questions to Guide Dashboard Design Educationally Significant? Is the data presented appropriate for our use at the policy level? Does the data display use the right comparative groups to assist us in interpreting challenges and strengths? Is there other educationally significant data related to the problem that exist or that we need to collect? Longitudinal & Comprehensive? Does the data provide a long enough timeframe to accurately gauge trends? Are there other factors impacting the outcomes? What else do we need to know? Is it possible to further disaggregate trend data to identify students needs? Is the data being displayed and accurate representation of reality? Are there elements being hidden or suppressed?

Questions, continued Context /Community Sensitive? Does the display of data take into account the specific features and characteristics of the students and families we serve? Are there ways we can disaggregate the data to better understand our student population? What are we doing about the Issues / Problems? How is the district addressing the presenting problem? What additional resources or strategies do we need to put in place? Does the board have the right policies in place to address the problem or issue? Are there recurring systems characteristics, either positive or negative, that impact student achievement?

Types of Gauges Percent of Students Meeting WASL Standards Percent of Students in each WASL Performance Level Percent of Students Meeting WASL Standards by Ethnicity and Grade Level NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress : % above or below the state uniform bar

Summary Views: Multiple Grades 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% WASL Reading: Grades 4, 7, & 10 % of Students Meeting Standard State Uniform Bar for this grade in this year 0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 Grade 4 Grade 7 Grade 10 Renton SD State

Summary Views: Components of Your System 100% Writing: Grade 4 - Percent Meeting Standard 90% 80% Elem A Elem B Elem C State District 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year

Specific- An More Actionable WASL 4 Reading: Percent of Students by Level 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 80% 60% 40% 22% 26% 20% 27% 33% 32% 20% 46% 38% 40% 46% 42% 46% Meeting Standard -27% -31% -31% -4% -5% -8% -22% -18% -16% -4% -7% -5% Level 1: Well Below Standard Level 2: Below Standard Level 3: Above Standard Level 4:Exceeds Standard

Community Sensitive 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% WASL 10 Reading: Ethnic Achievement Gap % of Students Meeting Standard ` 03 04 05 06 03 04 05 06 03 04 05 06 03 04 05 06 03 04 05 06 Native American Asian American African American Hispanic White Copyright The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2004

Other Types of Gauges Unexcused Absences by Elementary, Middle and High School Levels Percent of Students Graduating On-time Number of Students Enrolled 5 Year Trend Percent of Students Enrolled by Special Programs Cohort Student Academic Achievement Data Student Discipline Rates College Readiness and attendance Second Grade Reading Fluency and Accuracy Assessment Results Other Assessments e.g.: MAP or SAT / ACT Scores

Where Could We Go From Here? Is there more to achievement than WASL? What factors impact achievement? Which indicators? Lagging Indicators Leading Indicators

What Drives Achievement? (aka the McRel-Marzano Marzano research) Scenario Percentile Entering Percentile Leaving Average School / Average Teacher Highly Ineffective School / Ineffective Teacher Highly Effective School / Ineffective Teacher Ineffective School / Highly Effective Teacher Highly Effective School / Highly Effective Teacher Highly Effective School / Average Teacher 50 50 50 3 50 34 50 63 50 96 50 78 Source: Alison Olzendam, Ph. D. Co-President, Powerful Teaching and Learning Group, LLC. AWSP Fall Conference 2008 Session with Sue Mills, Executive Director, CEE

4 Elements of Educational Excellence Leadership Student Learning Organization Instruction The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. www.effectiveness.org Consistent Practice: How do we support data acquisition and use across all 4 Elements? 3 Components of Interpretation: Status, Improvement, & Growth

Handout: Examples & Ideas For Your Consideration Leadership Student Learning Organization Instruction The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. www.effectiveness.org

Comments? Questions? greg@effectiveness.org Leadership Student Learning Organization Instruction The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. www.effectiveness.org