oneusg UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures

oneusg UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures Town Hall Meeting April 28, 2015 Middle Georgia State College, Macon, GA

ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION Portions of the Town Hall presentation content are forward-looking and are subject to change based on scope, resources or timeline requirements 2

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures WELCOME 3

AGENDA 10 AM - NOON Welcome Craig Golden Today s Schedule and Speakers Why oneusg? Craig Golden Chancellor Direction Policies and Procedures Update Project Timeline, Scope & Governance Craig Golden & Diane Kirkwood Functional Leads Current Focus New Technologies Paula Casey & Alex Mackintosh HR/Faculty Events Paula Casey Payroll Adel Riyad Commitment Accounting Carrie Vallone Time & Labor Barney Woods Absence Management Alex Mackintosh Benefits Administration Amy Russell Break for Lunch 4

AGENDA 1:15 4:00 PM Third Party Vendor Update Debbie Lasher Technical Update Steve Liquori Change Management Kari Peterson Breakout Session by Functional area Functional Leads & Audience HR & Faculty Events Paula Casey Commitment Accounting Carrie Vallone Time & Labor, Payroll Barney Woods, Adel Riyad Benefits Administration, Absence Management Amy Russell, Alex Mackintosh Question & Answer Session Craig Golden Closing Craig Golden 5

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures WHY? 6

WHY? Need to Rebid/Replace ADP Software as Service Poor Contract Terms Vendor Alternatives Did Not Enjoy Full HR Spectrum of Services Lessons Learned: Varying Procedures Remained at Institutions Movement of the System to Common Financials (COA) Stabilization of Shared Services Organization Rapidly evolving technology alternatives on- or off-premise service alternatives competitive market for business system products and services Investment in multiple tools / platforms (ADP, PeopleSoft, other third-party) Regulatory, Functional and Technical Environment are Quickly Evolving Affordable Care Act Cloud Computing 7

WHY? HR - PeopleSoft Georgia Tech HR - PeopleSoft Georgia Regents HR - Mainframe University of Georgia HR - ADP Georgia State, State Colleges and Univ, Comprehensives Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia Tech Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia Regents Financials - Mainframe University of Georgia Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia State Financials PeopleSoft State Colleges and Univ, Comprehensive 3 Technical Platforms PeopleSoft Mainframe ADP Six Support Organizations Sandersville (Call Center & Support) University of Georgia (HR & Financials) Georgia Tech (HR & Financials) Georgia Regents (HR & Financials) Georgia State (Financials) Georgia First (Financials) Disparate Business Practices and Policies Multiple Third Party Relationships i.e. - Cobra Administration, Garnishment Processing, Tax Filing, Non-Resident Alien Reporting oneusg 8

WHY? Time Entry Deltek Kronos (Multiple Versions) E-Time Paper Non-Resident Alien Software Glacier Windstar COBRA Administration Discovery Benefits ADP Manual Recruiting PeopleAdmin Taleo PeopleSoft HireTouch Tenure Calculation Varies Across Many Institutions Background Checks Varies Across Many Institutions Effort Reporting Custom bolt-on Application Paper / Spreadsheet 9

WHY? If you started the University System of Georgia today. What would this picture look like? HR - PeopleSoft Georgia Tech HR - PeopleSoft Georgia Regents HR - Mainframe University of Georgia HR - ADP Georgia State, State Colleges and Univ, Comprehensives Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia Tech Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia Regents Financials - Mainframe University of Georgia Financials - PeopleSoft Georgia State Financials PeopleSoft State Colleges and Univ, Comprehensive 3 Technical Platforms PeopleSoft Mainframe ADP Six Support Organizations Sandersville (Call Center & Support) University of Georgia (HR & Financials) Georgia Tech (HR & Financials) Georgia Regents (HR & Financials) Georgia State (Financials) Georgia First (Financials) Disparate Business Practices and Policies Multiple Third Party Relationships i.e. - Cobra Administration, Garnishment Processing, Tax Filing, Non-Resident Alien Reporting oneusg 10

WHY? HR - PeopleSoft Research, State Colleges and Universities, Comprehensives Financials - PeopleSoft Research, State Colleges and Universities, Comprehensives One Technical Platform PeopleSoft One Support Organization Shared Services Harmonized Business Practices and Policies One Set of Third Party Relationships Serving all Institutions oneusg 11

WHY? Today is our time to. Address industry trends (cloud computing, service alternatives, mobile devices etc.) Leverage corporate/vendor relationships Create culture of collaboration, continuous improvement, effectiveness Consider evolving workplace and work force Capitalize on expertise throughout the system Leverage USG and campus efforts to date 12

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures HOW? 13

HOW? one Mission the USG is committed to pursuing operational efficiencies and being a model steward of resources Consolidate multiple support organizations into oneusg Unify all institutions on the oneusg technology platform (PeopleSoft) Standardize the language used to describe human resources, financials and supply chain transactions the USG is committed to timely and thorough review of programs, services and policies for currency and relevance Supplement, retire and re-author board policy, business procedures and HR practices in support of oneusg Extend shared services mission to innovate oneusg solutions beyond the existing footprint Deploy a governance model that sustains the oneusg solution Goal: address immediate systems needs while maintaining focus on future needs and vision oneusg 14

HOW? Lessons Learned from ADP Implementation Avoid Big Bang Pilot solutions to ensure mature business processes and proper training for support staff before rolling out to all institutions Transparent Communication is Critical People resist what they don t know or fully understand Address Pain Points 10 Month Faculty Benefits Over 12 Months Joint Staffing Incomplete Accounting Model Silo d Service Offerings Policies and Procedures Must Support Service Offering oneusg 15

HOW? Proposed Roadmap ADP Replacement Deployment - Pilot (Phase 1) In Process Transition 2 Institutions off ADP to PeopleSoft v9.2 Identify / Deploy ADP Replacement Services Collaborate to Define Standardized Business Practices to Deploy Across All Institutions Pilot Solutions in a Controlled Environment Build / Execute a Repeatable Change Plan Recruiting and Onboarding (Phase 2) Initializing Evaluate and Select Enterprise Solution for Recruiting and Onboarding 16

HOW? Proposed Roadmap ADP Replacement Deployment (Phase 3) Not Started Transition Additional Institutions off ADP All remaining institutions except GSU and GPC ADP Replacement Deployment (Phase 4) Not Started Transition / Consolidate GPC & GSU off ADP Research Institution Deployment (Phase 5) Not Started Transition Georgia Regents Research Institution Deployment (Phase 6) Not Started Transition Georgia Tech Research Institution Deployment (Phase 7) Not Started Transition UGA 17

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures PHASE 1 PILOT IMPLEMENTATION 18

PILOT INSTITUTIONS Georgia Gwinnett University System Office 19

PILOT SCOPE Institution oneusg oneusg oneusg oneusg oneusg oneusg Institution oneusg Institution Talent Acquisition Onboarding Human Resources & Faculty Events Payroll Time & Labor Benefits Administration Self Service Sponsored Research / Effort Reporting Salary Distribution Performance Management HCM Project scope (Phase 1) limited to core functionality HR &Faculty Events Payroll Time & Labor Benefits Administration Self Service Future initiatives will extend the oneusg solution (as prioritized by the executive council) oneusg 20

PILOT SCOPE GGC Current Phase oneusg Platform Transitions BOSS (Benefits) to PeopleSoft EV5 (HR, Position Management, Payroll, Faculty Events) to PeopleSoft etime (Time Entry and Leave Management) to PeopleSoft New Functionality (PeopleSoft) Employee & Manager Self Service Future Phase PeopleAdmin (Recruiting & Onboarding) to Enterprise Solution Existing business processes and technology platforms would stay in place until moving to Enterprise Recruiting and Onboarding Solution Selected Performance Management to PeopleSoft Effort Reporting to PeopleSoft Identity Management to GLUU Document Management to Enterprise Solution Profile Management Commitment Accounting (Payroll Distribution and Encumbrance Projection) Third Party Services Cobra Administration > RFP Selected Vendor Garnishment Processing > RFP Selected Vendor Tax Filing > RFP Selected Vendor Note: The slide illustrates a concept / approach and not scope decisions made at this point Benefits Billing > RFP Selected Vendor 21

PILOT SCOPE GGC one challenge scope containment one design map disparate business processes to packaged software deliver a solution that scales from a state college to a research institution one conversion map existing system language to the new standardized language one integration build interfaces to integrate with existing technology solutions at all institutions one training every employee and retiree is impacted by the HR deployment existing Sandersville staff and institution practitioners must be retrained one support deploy a new functional / technical support organization oneusg 22

PILOT SCOPE GGC What about Recruiting and Onboarding? Existing Recruiting and Onboarding Solutions Not Integrated with HCM Application (except GRU) Identified as a Priority by Leadership Team Enterprise Solution Identification Required First Project Independent of oneusg Pilot Deployment Project Resourced Separately from oneusg HCM Can be Deployed Stand Alone Integration with HCM at a Future Date (Not required if PeopleSoft selected) Note: No Plans to Build Integration with PeopleAdmin or HireTouch oneusg 23

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures PHASE X RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION 24

RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION SCOPE GRU Current Phase oneusg Platform Transitions PeopleSoft 9.1 to PeopleSoft 9.2 HR Position Management Payroll Benefits Time and Labor Recruiting Emplloyee and Manager Self Service Effort Reporting New Functionality Future Phase PeopleSoft Recruiting to Enterprise Solution Assumes PeopleSoft isn t selected as enterprise solution Document Management to Enterprise Solution Absence Management Smart Hire Templates Existing Technology Integration Identity Management Integration Document Management Integration Third Party Services Cobra Administration > RFP Selected Vendor Garnishment Processing > RFP Selected Vendor Tax Filing > RFP Selected Vendor Benefits Billing > RFP Selected Vendor Note: The slide illustrates a concept / approach and not scope decisions made at this point 25

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures TAKEAWAYS 26

TAKEAWAYS No Institution loses functionality when transitioning to oneusg Some lateral movements may be required Changes to business processes / procedures Similar software functionality (eg. Time Entry) Some functionality / integrations will be grandfathered in order for institutions to recoup investments made to date When functionality / integrations grandfathered Sunset timeline will be agreed to and communicated No additional investments will be made in existing solutions Future investments directed at enterprise solution eg. Recruiting and Onboarding 27

TAKEAWAYS When new solutions are needed. oneusg will Partner with institutions to identify / select enterprise solutions Author contracts in such a way that all institutions will benefit from solution Work with governing bodies to prioritize deployment Collaborate with system office to align policies and procedures with enterprise solution 28

TAKEAWAYS the spirit of oneusg in action Recruiting and Onboarding Selection Affordable Care Act Software (Shared Services Initiated) SciQuest Contract Standardization Oracle Renegotiations Non-Resident Alien Software (System Office Initiated) Affirmative Action Software (Georgia Regents Initiated) ADP Replacement Services Time Clock Replacement Background Checks (Georgia Tech Initiated) 29

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures APPROACH 30

APPROACH Business Process Review and Standardization Collaborate with Institutions to Design Solution Submit Business Policy Changes to Governing Body Project Initiation Establish Governance Assemble Project Teams Train Project Team Negotiate Software licensing Solution Build (Fit/Gap & Development) Define Standard Data Elements Map Software to Business Processes Build Interfaces and Conversions Configure Software Integrate Existing Systems to Future State Testing Exercise Conversion Process Verify Security Test Deployment Train Users Pilot Institution Legacy Retirement Phased Rollout oneusg 31

APPROACH - FIT GAP DEFINITION The task to formally determine how a system meets or fails to meet documented business requirements Fit/Gap should be an interactive facilitated session to analyze and compare the business practices and requirements with delivered PeopleSoft functionality Fit: Business Requirement is satisfied using delivered system functionality Gap: Business Requirement isn t met using delivered system functionality

APPROACH - FIT GAP OBJECTIVES Design a solution that will support the most complex business processes Develop a solution to enable the transition off ADP Deploy system functionality when needed ie. Prioritize development effort by phase No institution should take a step backwards when transitioning to oneusg

APPROACH - FIT GAP Fit/Gap Goals Configure future state system Marry future state business process design to PeopleSoft Identify system requirements (R)eports (I)ntegrations / Interfaces (C)onversions (E)nhancements Design solution for the most complex Prioritize requirements by deployment phase (ie. when is functionality needed) Fit / Gap Process Facilitated / Lead by Implementation Partner Business Process / Scenario Based Leverage the Business Process work completed with Accenture Supplement requirement s to address Gaps Collaborate to determine oneusg solution When Gap identified, evaluate Georgia Tech and Georgia Regents solution Assemble business requirement s and processes Protoype Functionality / Solutions Map business process to software Catalog configuration and conversion requirements 34

APPROACH Design Core Foundation Core is defined as What does ADP do for us today Design Research Institution Approach Address R1 Complexities Future Phases Design Institution Specific Approach Localize Interfaces Integrations Grandfathered Functionality

TEAM ASSIGNMENTS Human Resources Duane Ritter (UGA) Diane Kirkwood (SSC) Karen Iler (GSO) Laurie Jones (CSU) Felecia Donald (GSU) Shalonda Cargill (GT) Crystal Matthews (NGCU) Morgan Chavous (GRU) Eyvon Mitchell (GPC) Tonya Brooks (GGC) Lindsey Van Note (UGA) Marie Ballard Myer (USO) Benefits Travis Jackson (UGA) Dorothy Young (SSC) Karen Elliott (USO) Amy Phillips (KSU) David Smith (GGC) Annette Brown (CSU) Morgan Chavous (GRU) BeNedra Williams (GT) Stephanie Marshall (SSC) Natalie McCarley (USO) Payroll / Time and Labor Julie Camp (UGA) Ann Dinkheller (SSC) Collette Long (GSW) Rodney Byrd (WGU) Deborah Francis (GSO) Mary Nevill (CCG) Eddie Yates (GRU) Sandy Schneider (GGC) Dan Hann (GCSU) Diane Strenkowski (SSC) Valerie Harper (GPC) Jacqueline Sargeant (GT) Lindsey Van Note (UGA) Robert Elmore (GSU) Jennifer Cannida (SSC) Angela Petty (GT) Financial Accounting & Budget Prep Claire Arnold (USO) Kim Brown (GSO) Vanessa Snavely (GGC) Nick Henry (DSC) Tracey Cook (USO) Marissa Wester (SSC) Jan Fackler (VSU) Connie Clark (GSO) Debbie Lasher (USO) Layne Francis (USO) Laura Craft (GRU) Chad Cleveland (UGA) Mary Renfroe (GSU) Donell Nixon (GGC) Lynn Hobbs (USO) Debbie Farmer (USO) Collette Long (GSW) Ruth Berger (GGC) Eric Clark (SSC) Blake Waldrop (UGA) Faculty Events Laurie Bush (GRU) Lynn Lamanac (KSU) Susan Donoff (USO) Kristine Lesher (SSC) Lindsey Van Note (UGA) Laurie Jones (CSU) Reid Tankersley (GSU) Sharri Peck (GRU) Jane Smith (UGA) Policy and Procedures Sherma Francis (USO) Erika Gravett (KSU) Marion Fedrick (USO) Diane Kirkwood (SSC) 36

APPROACH - DELIVERABLES Requirements Matrix SharePoint > Lists > Requirements Configuration Matrix SharePoint > Lists > Configuration Fit / Gap Matrix SharePoint > Business Processes > Fit Gap Future State Business Process Flows Attached to Fit/Gap Business Processes Reports, Interfaces, Conversions and Enhancements SharePoint > Lists > RICE PeopleSoft Prototype HPLAY environment (Configure GGC Company) Issues, Risks, Policies and Procedures (Decision Points) SharePoint > Project Management > Decision Points Assumptions SharePoint > Project Management > Assumptions

APPROACH - DELIVERABLES 38

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures DECISION SOCIALIZATION 39

DECISIONS SOCIALIZATION Not all institutions will be represented in a fit/gap session therefore, key decisions will be socialized. These include Policy / Procedure Recommendations Shared Configuration Settings Installation Options Foundational Decisions (ie. Decisions that will impact future deployments) Socialization Process Fit/Gap Group Recommends & Documents Solution Human Resources Steering Committee Endorses Recommendation Institutions Concur, Concur with Suggestions or Do Not Concur with Recommendation

DECISION SOCIALIZATION Decision Document Format (template to be provided) Issue Background / Metrics Options Recommendation Decision Date Expectations Executive Summary Format Fit/Gap Participants will be Asked to Draft Decision Documents and Present to Steering Committee

DECISION SOCIALIZATION

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures GOVERNANCE 43

GOVERNANCE oneusg Executive Council Executive Sponsor Chancellor Huckaby HCM Steering Committee Vice Chancellor Human Resources Accounting and Sponsored Research Accounting and Budget Prep Benefits Practitioner Payroll Practitioner HR Practitioner Chief HR Officer X 4 Chief HR Officer Academic Affairs System Office Leadership Team John Brown Vice Chancellor - Fiscal Affairs Marion Fedrick Vice Chancellor - Human Resources Curt Carver Chief Information Officer Houston Davis Chief Academic Officer Steve Wrigley Vice Chancellor Administration Shelly Nichols Vice Chancellor - Planning Project Advisors John Fuchko (USO) Audit Kimberly Ballard Washington (USO) Legal John Scoville (USO) Technology Becky Prince (USO) Shared Services Project Leadership Craig Golden Project Manager (Consultant) Kurt Collins Project Advisor (Consultant) Diane Kirkwood HR Functional Lead Lynn Hobbs Financials Functional Lead Debbie Lasher Project Financials Steve Liquori Technical Lead (Consultant) Sponsored Research TBD Policies and Procedures Sherma Francis - Lead Human Resources Paula Casey - Lead Payroll Adel Riyad - Lead Conversion / Integration TBD Enterprise Data TBD Faculty Events Paula Casey - Lead Payroll Accounting / Budget Carrie Vallone - Lead Reports / Development TBD Change Management Kari Peterson - Lead Benefits Amy Russell - Lead Absence Management Alex MacIntosh - Lead Workflow TBD Implementation Teams Security TBD Time and Labor Barney Woods - Lead Technical Infrastructure Glenn Leavell - Lead Third Party Vendors Debbie Lasher - Lead Cross - Functional Teams

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Role and Responsibilities: Define strategic direction for oneusg program within goals and direction set by the Chancellor and Board of Regents Additional shared services to deploy Approve project budget, scope and timeline Define Enterprise Roadmap Oversee implementation project(s), shared services execution, and Shared Services Center Champion oneusg initiatives with peer groups Function: President/Chancellor may serve or designate an institution participant Participant responsible for coordinating with subject matter experts at institutions when decisions are needed Replaces existing Shared Services Governing Council Rotating members serve two or three-year terms

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Participating Institutions University System Office (Permanent) University of Georgia (Permanent) Georgia Institute of Technology (Permanent) Georgia Regents University (Permanent) Georgia State University (Permanent) Georgia Southern University (Rotating) Valdosta State University (Rotating) Georgia Gwinnett College (Rotating) University of North Georgia (Rotating)

HCM STEERING COMMITTEE Role Implementation project oversight and issue remediation Approve functional design approach and the deployment of standardized business practices Submit policy recommendations to Executive Council (or appropriate governing body) for consideration and approval How it functions Comprised of thought leaders from institutions and the System Office Mixture of director and practitioner resources Monthly meeting bi-weekly or more during solution design sessions

HR STEERING COMMITTEE Members Marion Fedrick (USO) Vice Chancellor Human Resources Carol Gibson (GT) Accounting and Sponsored Research Julie Peterson (KSU) Accounting and Budget Prep Karin Elliott (USO) Benefits Practitioner Robert Elmore (GSU) HR Practitioner Rebecca Carol (AA) Chief HR Officer Susan Norton (GRU) Chief HR Officer Linda Noble (USO) Academic Affairs Juan Jarrett (UGA) Chief HR Officer Katharine Kyle (GGC) Chief HR Officer - Pilot Tom Gausvik (CSCU) Chief HR Officer Kim Harrington (GT) Chief HR Officer Linda Nelson (GSU) Chief HR Officer Quint Hill (USO) Chief HR Officer - Pilot

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures POLICIES & PROCEDURES UPDATE 49

POLICY AND PROCEDURE Establish Policies in support of the standardization of HCM business practices Provide practitioners with system office guidance to discourage exception business practices Address disparate solutions to HR business issues Provide clarifications to ambiguous terminology or business practices Deliverables Board Policy Business Procedures Manual Human Resource Administrative Practices (HRAP) 50

POLICY AND PROCEDURES Potential Board Policy 12 month pay schedule for all employees 7/5ths transition to 3 Monthly Premiums Withheld in Last Month Pay Calendar Standardization Workweek and Overtime Pay Standardization Leave Standardization on How Leave is Earned and Accrued Comp Time vs. Overtime Background Checks Mandated for All Employees Time Entry and Approvals Proxy System Office Standardization of Voluntary Benefits Reduction in Tax Sheltered Annuities Centralization of Retiree Administration Off-Cycle Pay Criteria Eligibility Test Standardized Hire Start Dates Standardized Benefit Start Dates Standardization of Effort Reporting Money Movement Benefit Liability Wash oneusg 51

oneusg Shared Services and Standardization of Administrative Systems, Practices and Procedures FUNCTIONAL LEADS 52

oneusg Manager Dashboard Fluid User Interface Work Centers Forms Builder NEW TECHNOLOGIES PAULA CASEY & ALEX MACKINTOSH 53

MANAGER DASHBOARD 5/1/2015 54

FLUID USER INTERFACE The PeopleSoft Fluid User Interface introduces a number of important new features: Homepages Search Titles Notification Actions Navigations PeopleSoft Engagement Via Mobile Phone Tablet TouchScreen Computer 5/1/2015 55

FLUID INTERFACE Mobile Enablement 56

FLUID EMPLOYEE SELF SERVICE 57

FLUID MANAGER SELF SERVICE 5/1/2015 58

FLUID - ANALYTICS 5/1/2015 59

WORKCENTERS Standard delivered pagelets: My work My Links Queries Personalized User specific work items for review or completion Critical daily tasks Important application components Personalizations Access queries or pivot grids Output viewed in transaction panel Reports and Processes Report console, Key Reports 5/1/2015 60

WORKCENTERS 61

FORM BUILDER Configurable tool to create forms and specify approval process to follow Eliminate paper and email based approaches PeopleSoft forms are: Auditable Electronically Approved Immediately Accessible 5/1/2015 62

FORM BUILDER oneusg 5/1/2015 63

oneusg Profile Management Smart HR Templates HR / FACULTY EVENTS PAULA CASEY 64

PROFILE Profile Management allows User to define Tables & Fields without customization Profile Management integrates to Smart HR Templates Profile Management provides the ability to capture institutional data without customization Provide data to 3 rd party systems without customizations oneusg 5/1/2015 65

PROFILE In addition to competency type information, Profiles can be created to capture any non -delivered value that needs to be attached to an employee or a non-person entity Types of field attributes that can be captured include: Effective Date Dates Integers Decimals Percent Y/N Check Boxes Rating Models Text Fields Audit Date & Timestamps Approval Status Configurable selection values oneusg 5/1/2015 66

PROFILE Non-Person Profiles capture attributes / values for non-person entities such as Locations, Positions, Departments, Job Codes, Assignments and Business Units, etc. Aren t attached to EE s directly, but EE s that are associated to these non-person entities can inherit their attributes & values Examples: Non-Person Department Profile used to capture Client Specific attributes and Specialists. Non-Person Position Profile used to capture Skills & Competencies associated with a Job or Position oneusg 5/1/2015 67

PROFILE Integrated Employee / Manager Self-Service Functionality User Friendly, Intuitive Design with step-by-step on page Instructions Less Training; Fewer Help Desk Calls; Greater Acceptance Flexible Configuration: Easily configured with effective dated Client specific content No more One Size Must Fit All pages may be different but retain similar look & feel Fewer Customizations; Less Dev & on-going maintenance Smoother, Faster Upgrades Secure: Access to Sections - secured by Profile Role Audited by User ID & Date/Time Stamp Secure Data Access & Data Integrity Built-in Approval Functionality: Workflow routing & approval can be defined by Profile. Unique Approval Routings can be accommodated in PM Native Reporting Capability: XML Publisher - configure reports using MSWord templates Reports can be maintained by less Technical personnel oneusg 5/1/2015 68

SMART HR TEMPLATES Formally referred to as Smart Hire Template Leverages templates for any person, job, profile transactions in the system Multiple data types can be consolidated into 1 template oneusg 5/1/2015 69

oneusg Payroll Integrations and Processing Paycheck Modeler Retro Pay Processing Retro Benefits Deductions PAYROLL ADEL RIYAD 70

PEOPLESOFT INTEGRATION 71

PROCESSING STEPS 72

PAYCHECK MODELER Paycheck modeling enables employees to simulate changes to their paycheck without updating the production tables. The goal of self-service paycheck modeling is to empower the employee with the ability to make payroll-related decisions without calling the payroll department or help desk. The end result is to increase employee satisfaction while reducing the workload of the payroll department Paycheck modeling is useful to quickly and accurately calculate and simulate paychecks for various scenarios, including: The employee is due a bonus or a commission and would like to estimate the net take home pay The employee is working large amounts of irregular overtime and would like to estimate a check with the overtime pay included The employee received a large IRS refund and would like to adjust their withholding status accordingly and estimate the net take home pay The employee would like to modify various benefit costs to determine net take home pay during Open Enrollment or a Life Event change 73

PAYCHECK MODELER 74

PAYCHECK MODELER 75

PAYCHECK MODELER 76

PAYCHECK MODELER 77

PAYCHECK MODELER 78

PAYCHECK MODELER 79

PAYCHECK MODELER 80

PAYCHECK MODELER 81

PAYCHECK MODELER 82

PAYCHECK MODELER 83

PAYCHECK MODELER 84

PAYCHECK MODELER 85

RETRO PAY PROCESSING 86

RETRO BENEFIT DEDUCTIONS A retroactive change to employee or benefit-related data has an effective date prior to the last confirmed pay end date of the employee's pay group. Retroactive changes to benefits and deductions might become necessary for a variety of reasons: late paperwork, dataentry errors, modified union contracts, and changes to employment laws Triggering Individual Retroactive Benefit/Deduction Requests: 87

RETRO BENEFIT DEDUCTIONS Retroactive Benefits Deductions Changes Retro Ben. Requests Created by Trigger Processing for on-line changes Review Retroactive Requests Created by Mass Request Process for SQL changes Calculate Retroactive Benefits Review Calculation Results Load Retro Benefits Calculation to Paysheets/Arrears Review Paysheets/Arrears Calculate and Confirm Payroll Cycle 88

oneusg Big Picture System Highlights COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING CARRIE VALLONE 89

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Terminology Combination Code - shortcut used in HCM that represents a valid chartfield string Department Budget Table Assign funding allocation Budget A plan for expenses related to staffing Encumbrance A claim against funds. A projection of future expenses. Pre-Encumbrance An encumbrance that occurs before the employee/employer relationship occurs. For example, you would pre-encumber for funds for a new position that has just been approved but not filled. Actuals The actual amount of the encumbered portion that you have spent to date. An encumbered amount becomes an actual when an encumbered amount is paid. In HCM, these are the payroll expenses. Retro Distribution Retroactively reallocate payroll costs 90

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Definition What is Commitment Accounting? Assign Funding Sources to a Position or Employee Funding Sources are used for the GL Interface and Encumbrance processes Run Encumbrance Process to encumber the annual salary or preencumber vacant positions Run Actuals Distribution to attach funding sources to payroll costs 91

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING HR Payroll Commitment Accounting Funding HR Encumbrance Processing Start HR Payroll GL Interface To Finance End 92

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING 93

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING 94

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Key Features Budget Retro Retroactively reallocate payroll costs by retroactively changing funding (Department Budget Table) Allows users to review transactions before being posted to the General Ledger Displays original transactions and new transactions and requires approval Process to GL 95

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Key Features (Cont d) Direct Retro Search for payroll costs and provide instructions Review the old and new transactions Approve transaction Process to GL Retroactive payroll costs will flow from HCM to your Financials system Funding pages are kept separate from HR pages (define separate roles for each) 96

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Key Features (Cont d) Integrated Chartfield Messaging Setup new chartfield combination in Financials and instantly message changes to HCM 97

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING 98

COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Key Features Contd. GL Interface processing You have the flexibility to force benefits and taxes to not follow earnings Defined at position level Department Budget Table 99

oneusg Integration Time and Labor Flow Task Reporting Commitment Accounting (Payroll Distribution) Integration TIME & LABOR BARNEY WOODS 100

HIGH-LEVEL CONFIGURATION Time Period Calendars Coordinates with the Payroll Calendars Defines the begin and end days for the work week The Day Break Defines the End Point for each day and Instructs the system where to post reported hours 12:00 Midnight Hours worked before 12M post to Day 1; hours after to day 2; Shift Begin Posts all hours to the day that the shift begins Shift End Posts all hours to the day that the shift ends Employee Work Schedules Defines the assigned daily work schedule for each employee Used by Absence Management to determine total daily hours for time off reporting and days off 5/1/2015 101

HIGH-LEVEL CONFIGURATION Rounding Rules Used to define consistent segments of time; tenth of an hour, quarter hours, etc. Time and Labor Rules Used to define and apply special pay practices to reported time Calculates Overtime, Comp Time, Shift Differential, etc. Workgroups A group of rules that defines how employees will be compensated All employees must be assigned to a Work Group Similar function as Paygroups 5/1/2015 102

PROCESS FLOW PeopleSoft Time and Labor Process Flow Employee HR Specialist Hire / Assign Time Reporter & Absence Data Report Time & Request Time Off Manager / Approver Approve Work Time & Time Off TL & AM Administrator Run Time Administration & Absence Calc Processes Payroll Analyst Load TL & Absence Data Process Payroll oneusg 5/1/2015 103

Time Transfers to Different Funding Sources TASK REPORTING 5/1/2015 104

TASKGROUPS Use Taskgroups to assign time reporting Task Profiles to time reporters who perform ad hoc work for other departments/areas. Profiles allow selection of an alternate / appropriate funding source for specified hours of reported time. Custom rules ensure OT is applied to the appropriate fund source oneusg 5/1/2015 105

oneusg 5/1/2015 106

oneusg 5/1/2015 107

Integration Points COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING & TIME AND LABOR 5/1/2015 108

TIME AND LABOR & COMMITMENT ACCOUNTING Task Reporting TL integrates with CA functionality through Task Reporting. Time and Labor uses the combination codes to allocate to the appropriate Chart-Field. Time Administration Process Verifies that the Taskgroup is defined for Commitment Accounting. Prepares Allocated Payable Time for Payroll processing Commitment Accounting / Labor Distribution Distribute costs associated with Tasks Chart-Fields information. oneusg 5/1/2015 109

TL INTEGRATION SUMMARY HR => Time and Labor Absence Management => Time and Labor Time and Labor => Payroll Payroll => Commitment Accounting Commitment Accounting => General Ledger Again, our Time and Labor word of the day is Integration! oneusg 5/1/2015 110

oneusg Overview Functionality Process Flow ABSENCE MANAGEMENT ALEX MACKINTOSH 111

OVERVIEW Absence Management Short Term Leaves Extended (Long Term) Leaves Short Term Leaves Sick Vacation Personal Time Off (PTO) Extended Leaves FMLA Military STD/LTD Leaves of Absence (Unpaid) Educational/Professional Leaves oneusg 5/1/2015 112

ABSENCE MANAGEMENT - FUNCTIONALITY Leave Accruals Calculation Managing Leaves Balances Forecasting Leaves Requesting Leaves Approve Leaves Integrated Approval Framework with Delegation Processing Leave Requests Tracking Extended Leaves Leave Sharing/Donations Secure Document Storage (Attachments) Administering Extending Leaves (HIPAA Compliance) oneusg 5/1/2015 113

STRUCTURE Leave Sharing Short Term Leaves Sick Vacation PTO Forecasting Extended Leaves FMLA STD LTD Military Educational/Professional LOA Workmans Comp oneusg 5/1/2015 114

REGULAR LEAVE REQUEST oneusg 5/1/2015 115

REGULAR LEAVE BALANCES oneusg

LEAVE BALANCES oneusg 5/1/2015 117