1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Scope of Work I. Scope of Solicitation II. Instructions to Offerors III. Scope of Work / Specifications IV. Terms and Conditions - Special V. Appendices to Scope of Work (if required) I. SCOPE OF SOLICITATION Clemson University desires to hire a consulting firm to assist Clemson personnel developing a reporting system for its Kuali Coeus and InfoEd systems. This work is estimated to take place from October 2012 through March 2013 and will be awarded to a single vendor. AWARD Award will be made to one Offeror. Award will be made to the highest ranked, responsive and responsible Offeror whose offer is determined to be the most advantageous to the University. The contract will be a one-time firm fixed price for the services outlined herein with an option for future consulting services up to one year from time of contract award. MAXIMUM CONTRACT PERIOD ESTIMATED Initial Start date: 10/19/2012. End date: 03/31/2013. Maximum contract period: Start Date: 10/19/2012 End Date: 10/18/2013. Dates provided are estimates only. Any resulting contract will begin on the date specified in the notice of award. Timeline for Project Implementation: These services are estimated to take place from October 2012 through March 2013. Clemson will retain control in the selection of the start date for project implementation, which will be specified in the notice of award. Deadline for Receipt of Questions: All questions must be emailed to Tammy Crooks at duncant@clemson.edu prior to September 17, 2012, 12:00 Noon ET. 1
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 II. INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE LABELLING: Include Offeror s name on the cover of any specifications or descriptive literature submitted with your proposal. SUBMITTING YOUR PROPOSAL: Regardless of specific requirements below or in this document, Offerors are required to submit their proposal electronically through the Clemson University online bidding system. To do so you must login (registering first) at https://sciquest.ionwave.net/prod/default.aspx?company=clemson, and follow specific instructions for this solicitation. You should register several days in advance of the bid closing date so you can be approved and login in time to submit a response. Do NOT simply email or mail in proposals based on this scope of work document. You must attach your complete proposal response as two separate.pdf files in the online bidding system - one file as a technical only (i.e. no cost information) and one file as a cost proposal. Submit any additional files if required as redacted proposals. These attachments must address all the specific requirements outlined in Section II, Instructions to Offerors, as well as Section III, Scope of Work/Specifications. REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENT: Qualified Offerors are encouraged to submit a proposal for the Kuali Coeus and InfoEd Reporting as outlined within this solicitation specification. Each proposal must meet the minimum requirements contained within this solicitation to be considered for a contract award. INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS TO SUBMIT - In addition to information requested elsewhere in this solicitation, Offerors should submit the following information for purposes of evaluation: 1. Cover Letter Offeror s shall provide a cover letter that contains a commitment to provide the product/services described in this solicitation. The cover letter must include the name and signature of a representative of the Offeror who is authorized to negotiate a contract with the University and should summarize the overall benefits to selecting your company and what your company considers to be the most important factors involved in the selection of a Kuali Coeus and InfoEd Reporting Consulting Firm. 2. Table of Exceptions A summary must state whether your proposal does or does not fully comply with the requirements defined in this solicitation and shall provide a detailed list of exceptions to the Scope of Work or other solicitation requirements including all attachments. This list must be in table form and must identify the page, section number, provision and specific exception, non-conformance and/or substitute language proposed. Failure to identify any specific items of noncompliance will result in the University assuming compliance. The University, at its sole discretion, may modify or reject any exception or proposed change, and an exception may also make a proposal non-responsive. 2
83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 3. Executive Summary The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the solution being proposed by the Contractor in such a way as to provide the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Contractor s Technical Proposal. Contractor s must present their understanding of the problems being addressed by implementing a new system, the objectives and intended results of the project, and the scope of work. Contractor s shall summarize how their Technical Proposal meets the requirements of the Request for Proposal, and why they are best qualified to perform the work required herein. 4. References The Contractor shall provide a minimum of 4 references with contact information including email addresses. Three of these references should be from higher education clients. Clemson reserves the right to check any reference(s), regardless of the source of the reference information, including but not limited to, those that are identified by the company in the proposal, those indicated through the explicitly specified contacts, those that are identified during the review of the proposal, or those that result from communication with other entities involved with similar projects. Information to be requested and evaluated from references may include, but is not limited to, some or all of the following: project description and background, job performed, functional and technical abilities, communication skills and timeliness, cost and schedule estimates and accuracy, problems (poor quality deliverables, contract disputes, work stoppages, etc.), overall performance, and whether or not the reference would rehire the firm or individual. 5. Qualifications: A. MANDATORY MINIMUM (JAN 2006): In order to be qualified to receive award, you must meet the following mandatory minimum qualifications: a) The contractor must have at least five years of experience with Business Objects implementations with work similar to the RFP, that at least one of the references be related. b) The contractor in response to the RFP specify the instructor- student ratio for any hands-on-training. The contractor must have proven experience and expertise with the following: Database Analysis skills required to produce Data Warehouse/Business Intelligence reports 3
129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 Understand and use Business Objects Data Integrator Understand and use Business Objects Infoview, Web Intelligence and Crystal Reports (a) The Procurement Officer may, in his discretion, consider (1) the experience of a predecessor firm or of a firm's key personnel which was obtained prior to the date offeror was established, and/or (2) any subcontractor proposed by offeror. (b) Provide a detailed, narrative statement providing adequate information to establish that you meet all the requirements stated in subparagraph (a) above. Include all appropriate documentation. B. Summary of Contractor s Corporate Experience: The Contractor shall provide a summary matrix listing the Contractor s previous projects similar to this Request for Proposal in size, scope and complexity. The Evaluation Committee will use no more than three (3) narrative project descriptions submitted by the Contractor during its evaluation of the proposal. The Contractor must provide narrative descriptions to highlight the similarities between their experience and this Request for Proposal. These descriptions must include: 1) The time period of the project; 2) The scheduled and actual completion dates; 3) Staff-months expended; 4) The contractor s responsibilities; 5) For reference purposes, a customer name (including the name of a contact person, a current telephone number, a facsimile number and e-mail address); 6) Each project description shall identify whether the work was performed as the prime contractor or as a subcontractor. If a Contractor performed as the prime contractor, the description must provide the originally scheduled completion date and budget, as well as the actual (or currently planned) completion date and actual (or currently planned) budget. Contractor and subcontractor(s) experience must be listed separately. Narrative descriptions submitted for subcontractors must be specifically identified as subcontractor projects. C. Contractor Key Staff: The Contractor is expected to propose sufficient staff with the requisite skills and abilities to meet all requirements in this RFP. The Contractor must identify the personnel and provide resumes and references for the identified key staff. If the Contractor s methodology deems other staff as key, the Contractor must identify the positions, provide representative job descriptions, identify the personnel and provide 4
175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 resumes and references. In addition, the Contractor must provide representative job descriptions for any other positions identified in the Contractor s proposed staffing plan. 6. Implementation Plan/Timeline The Contractor s proposal must describe policies, plans and intentions with regard to maintaining continuity of key staff assigned to the project and avoiding and minimizing the impact of necessary staff changes. Provide a detailed plan that includes a timeline with dates of initiation and completion based on Work Period specified in Section III, #9 below. Along with the plan and timeline, provide a detailed work plan. The detailed work plan should include a complete work breakdown structure with all tasks having work forecasts, clear deliverables, and appropriate dependencies (predecessors, successors). The plan should prove that the target dates are achievable and support is provided. Any on-site visits required to perform the services herein must be included in the cost of the base solution. This must include all travel, meals, lodging and expenses. 7. Insurance The successful Offeror shall provide satisfactory evidence of all required insurance coverage and licenses PRIOR TO PERFORMANCE or AS PART OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. 8. Agreements Include any forms or agreements i.e. Service Level Agreements (SLA) to include performance commitments. 9. Consulting Detail plan for future consulting services based on fixed hourly rate to include travel, meals, lodging and all expenses. This cost will not be used in evaluation but may be negotiated. Future consulting services may be requested after the initial Scope of Work has been completed based on the firm fixed price offered. These future consulting services may be requested under this contract up to one year from time of contract award. 10. Technical Proposal Provide a technical proposal with a detailed description of how your product/service meets the requirements documented in this section as well as Section III/Scope of Work/Specifications. Offeror s proposed solution must describe and identify all products/services to fulfill the scope of this RFP document which must be identified as Offeror s base solution. It is the intent of Clemson University to acquire the best base solution possible and for evaluation purposes, it is imperative that Offeror s completely and carefully word and convey all of the information requested. Offers should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of Offeror's capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the RFP. Emphasis should be on 5
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 completeness and clarity of content. Offeror s must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the project purpose, scope, activities, requirements and responsibilities. Technical Proposal responses must be complete and detailed, must address each section using identical section titles, and must follow the order and use the numbering scheme contained in the RFP Purpose and Scope of Work. Offeror s must discuss their approach and methodology for each of the activities and deliverables in the proposal and identify key dates. Again, the base solution must describe/identify/include all products/services to fulfill the scope of this RFP document. However, there may be additional products/services/enhancements/add-ons that have not been requested in the scope of the RFP document but will be required for Offeror s product/service to fulfill the scope of the RFP document. If this is the case, Offeror s must identify/describe/include these additional products/services in their technical proposal as the base solution. Any additional products/services/enhancements/ add-ons Offeror requires in the base solution to fulfill the scope of the RFP must also be identified/included in the Offeror s Cost Proposal as the cost of the base solution. If your offer includes any additional enhancements and/or add-on components or services that is not required to fulfill the scope of the RFP, these products/services must be identified and described in your Technical Proposal as well as your Cost Proposal documents and labeled in each proposal as Appendix A so that Clemson University can easily and clearly identify what is included in your technical base solution and what is included in your cost base solution. Including a separate appendix for products/services not included in the base solution will aide in our evaluation process along with providing a complete understanding of your offer contents. Offers which include either modifications to any of the solicitation's contractual requirements or an offeror's standard terms and conditions may be deemed non-responsive and not considered for award. 11. Cost Proposal The cost of the proposed products/services must be itemized by Offeror in the Cost Proposal, addressing the requirements listed throughout proposal document. Offeror s proposed solution must describe and identify all products/services to fulfill the scope of this RFP document which must be identified as Offeror s base solution. It is the intent of Clemson University to acquire the best base solution possible and for evaluation purposes, it is imperative that Offeror s completely and carefully word and convey all of the information requested. For each requirement, the Offeror s response to the item must be presented, along with which product/service addresses the requirement. At the end of the document in the Cost Proposal, the Offeror must present all products/services identified as necessary to fulfill the requirements of the RFP document and the cost of each must be listed separately as the base solution. Again, the base solution must describe/identify/include all products/services to fulfill the scope of this RFP document. However, there may be additional products/services/enhancements/add-ons that have not been requested in the scope of the RFP document but will be required for Offeror s product to fulfill 6
267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 the scope of the RFP document. If this is the case, Offeror s must identify/describe/include these additional products/services in their Cost Proposal as the base solution. If your offer includes any additional enhancements and/or add-on components or services that is not required to fulfill the scope of the RFP, these products/services must be identified and described in your Cost Proposal and labeled as Appendix A so that Clemson University can easily and clearly identify what is included in your cost base solution. Including a separate appendix for products not included in the base solution will aide in our evaluation process along with providing a complete understanding of your offer contents. All costs must be included in the Cost Proposal. Cost Proposal must be separate from the Technical Proposal as stated above in RFP Submittal section. Do not include cost in Technical Proposal. These should be submitted as two separate documents via.pdf attachments in the online bidding system. Total cost to fulfill requirements specified herein must also be indicated in Bid Line Item Pricing in online bidding system. Your separate cost proposal may go into more detail in terms of cost breakdown, options, etc, but it must also clearly indicate the cost you enter into the online system. This is the cost that will be used for evaluation purposes and should reflect the cost for the base technical proposal you are offering in response to this solicitation. If there are conflicts in the costs you propose or Clemson cannot clearly determine a total cost for your proposal, your response may be deemed non-responsive. Please provide the following in the separate cost proposal: Please include an itemized list for completion of all services outlined herein. Must be a firm fixed price to complete entire project. Cost must be all inclusive to include travel, meals, lodging and other expenses. Please include the hourly rate for future consulting services, or needed assistance once initial project has been completed. These future consulting services are an option that may be utilized for up to one year from time of contract award. Future consulting services must be all inclusive to include travel, meals, lodging and all expenses. Although we are requesting hourly rate for future consulting services, the evaluation will be based on your firm fixed price to complete entire project as outlined herein. III. SCOPE OF WORK / SPECIFICATIONS 1. Introduction: Clemson University is a nationally recognized research university with approximately 1,500 proposal submissions per year to federal, state and private sponsors. The research conducted at Clemson also results in approximately 650 submissions per year to various research compliance committees including IRB, IACUC and IBC (biosafety). To manage administrative and business activities related to these submissions, Clemson 7
313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 currently employs an electronic Research Administration (era) system created by InfoEd International, Inc. Due to various internal performance and needs assessments, Clemson University has chosen to replace the current InfoEd system with the opensource Kuali Coeus and Kuali Rice era systems. This change will necessitate a significant new Data Warehouse reporting effort to gather data from the InfoEd database as well as the Kuali Coeus database. Clemson already has an established Data Warehouse / Business Intelligence reporting environment implemented using Oracle databases and SAP Business Objects. This environment already contains data elements from Peoplesoft Finance, Peoplesoft HR, and Banner student systems. It is Clemson s desire to incorporate data from the legacy InfoEd database as well as the new Kuali Coeus database into the established Enterprise Data Warehouse system. Clemson needs reports generated from the Enterprise Data Warehouse system for the Kuali Coeus implementation to be successful. 2. Technical and Functional Overview: In the current InfoEd system, version 11.801.04, Clemson is primarily concerned with the following functional modules and associated data: Proposal Tracking and Human Subjects Management. The Human Subjects Management module in InfoEd captures compliance protocol data such as statuses, dates, review types, submission history/type, personnel (identities and roles) and review decisions. This module excludes routing/workflow rules and electronic form data associated with the Human Subjects Development module. The InfoEd Proposal Tracking module captures data related to funding proposals such as, descriptive information (project titles, number identifiers, dates, etc.); sponsor information (name, types, etc.); budgetary information related to the project (award data, allocations, F&A, etc.) and information related to project personnel. The InfoEd application is hosted at Clemson University, and the vendor manages the application via portals into the application at our site. We have interfaces to load employee information and to load awards for managing post award expenditures from/to a ourt Financials system. A. InfoEd technical information: Database server: Oracle 10.2.0.4 running on a Solaris 10 operating system on a T5220 Web server: Dell PE2950 (4 GB); CPU = Intel Xeon E5420 @ 2.5Ghz (Dual Quad core processors); OS = Windows Server 2003 R2 x86 Standard Edition; Storage = Mirrored two 70gig internal disks 8
358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 Clemson has partnered with the Kuali Community, a collaboration of Colleges and Universities, dedicated to developing and sharing via open source, applications designed to work with the Higher Education environment. Our efforts in the Kuali partnership are to implement the Kuali Coeus and Kuali Rice components, and serve on the partnership board to help guide future enhancements and features. The initial usage of Kuali Coeus will closely mimic current usage of InfoEd; therefore this effort will primarily be concerned with the Kuali Coeus Proposal Log, Institutional Proposal, Award, and Protocol modules. In addition, the Kuali Identity Management (KIM) module of Kuali Rice will need to be populated with HR/identity information from the existing Clemson PeopleSoft system. B. Kuali systems technical information: Database server: Oracle version is 11.2.0.2 on a RedHat Enterprise Linux Web server: Tomcat 5.5.27/Apache OS: Redhat enterprise Linux 5.x C. Business Objects technical information: Database server: Oracle version is 10.2.0.4 (subject migrating to Oracle 11.2 during the project period) on Oracle Enterprise Linux Business Objects Enterprise Premium with Web Intelligence and Crystal Reports: version 3.1 OS: Windows 2003 R2 Service Pack 2 (subject to be upgraded during the project period) Business Objects Data Integrator: version 3.1 OS: Solaris version 10 3. Assessment scope As Clemson will be adding a significant amount of load to its existing Data Warehouse/Business Intelligence system, the consulting firm will be asked to assess the current SAP Business Objects environment, and provide detailed recommendations for improvements. 9
404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 Assessment Process: SAP BusinessObjects Architecture review Sizing Redundancy Failover Web tier Processing tier # of CMS, etc Evaluation of existing BOE Security model Identify the number of concurrent active users and simultaneous requests the BOE system components can support Identify BOE components at risk due to peak load times Evaluate system dependencies Assess any potential single points of failure in the BOE system Investigate the history of system performance including previous trouble spots. Test availability, functionality, and performance of BOE services; focus on performance / throughput of services Test the BOE Central Management Server (CMS) core functionality, CMS cache service, and CMS database connection Benchmark web application server response times Validate reports are set to take advantage of operational enhancements in the BOE architecture 4. Assessment Deliverables: Recommendations for BOE configuration changes that can improve performance Assist in delivering any relevant SDK that might be of assistance and improve processes Detailed documentation of BOE system review results Detailed documentation of performance enhancement recommendations for the BOE system. Detailed documentation on eliminating any single point of failure in the architecture. Evaluation of report processing and investigation into any procedures which could enhance performance Assist Clemson Data Warehouse / Business Intelligence team to implement recommendations. 5. Data Analysis, ETL, and Reporting scope Attached is list of report requirements, including data elements. These reports will need to be produced from data from both the legacy InfoEd and new Kuali Coeus systems. 10
449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 A. Data Analysis Process: Identify a consolidated list of data elements to be extracted from the Infoed and Kuali Coeus systems. Determine the table structures within the Infoed and Kuali Coesus databases where the data elements reside. Work with the Clemson DBA staff to design Enterprise Data Warehouse tables to contain the Infoed and Kuali Coeus data. These tables will integrate into the Enterprise Data Warehouse. These tables will be normalized, much like the source tables from the InfoEd and Kuali Coeus systems. Database tables will conform to Clemson standards. B. Data Analysis Deliverables: List of tables within the InfoEd and Kuali Coeus systems to be extracted. Table structures to be created within Clemson s Enterprise Data Warehouse to contain the InfoEd and Kuali Coeus data. C. ETL and Report Table Design Process: Produce Business Objects Data Integrator jobs to extract the data from the InfoEd and Kuali Coeus databases to store into the Enterprise Data Warehouse. These Data Integrator jobs will conform to Clemson standards. Work with the Clemson DBA staff to design a data mart database to contain tables for reporting. These tables will normally be de-normalized and will be structured for efficient reporting. The data mart tables will contain data from both the InfoEd data warehouse tables and the Kuali Coeus data warehouse tables, mapped and combined into cohesive table structures. Produce Business Objects Data Integrator jobs to extract the data from the Enterprise Data Warehouse database to store into the Data Mart database. These Data Integrator jobs will conform to Clemson standards D. ETL and Report Table Design Deliverables: Business Objects Data Integrator jobs to extract the data from the InfoEd and Kuali Coeus databases to store into the Enterprise Data Warehouse. Data Mart database tables for efficient reporting. Business Objects Data Integrator jobs to extract the data from the Enterprise Data Warehouse database to store into the Data Mart database. E. Reporting Design Process: Work with the Clemson Data Warehouse / Business Intelligence team to produce a Business Objects Universe suitable for creating Web Intelligence reports for the attached report requirements. This Business Objects universe will conform to Clemson standards. The Business Objects universe will contain appropriate notes and documentation for clarity for users to use the universe for ad hoc reporting. Produce reports from the attached specifications. These reports can be a combination of Web Intelligence reports or Crystal reports, depending on 11
495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 which is appropriate. These reports will be scheduled within the Business Objects system to run on the appropriate time schedule. F. Reporting Design Deliverables: Business Objects Universe containing all data needed for the attached reporting specifications. Combination of Web Intelligence reports and Crystal reports to produce all reports outlined in the attached report specifications. 6. Training Services Scope Selected Clemson personnel (no more than 15) will need to be trained on how to use Business Objects Infoview to use the reports produced above. Also, a portion of these personnel will need to be trained on a basic level on how to generate ad hoc Web Intelligence reports from the Business Objects universe produced above. 7. Training Services Deliverables: Appropriate training documentation to use the reports constructed. Training sessions with Kuali Coeus / InfoEd users to access the constructed reports. Training will also be provided for those that will be creating ad hoc Web Intelligence reports. 8. Work Tasks Clemson University seeks consulting assistance to create a reporting infrastructure for Kuali Coeus / InfoEd information. This reporting infrastructure will integrate into Clemson s existing Data Warehouse / Business Intelligence (DW/BI) Business Objects infrastructure. After construction of the reporting infrastructure, training will be provided for the prospective users of the system. A. General Document all discussions and decisions and store in Project repository Document all training materials, configuration documents, guides, etc. in Project repository Documentation of the decisions, process, solution, configuration and training will become property of Clemson University B. Initial Considerations and Recommendation Review with Clemson the existing Data Warehouse / Business Intelligence infrastructure. Determine when to implement the recommendations from the assessment phase. Work with the Clemson DW/BI team to implement the recommendations from the assessment phase. 12
540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 Review with the Clemson functional team the current data usage in InfoEd and the proposed data usage in Kuali Coeus. Identify opportunities for best practices Discuss and agree on business rules and approach with functional staff Discuss and agree on storage considerations for the databases. Discuss and agree on standards with the DW/BI team. Provide recommended approach plan outlining decisions above and detailed approach for the solution and present to Kuali Implementation team and the DW/BI team. C. Implementation phase Implement approved plan Issues that develop while conducting work will be discussed with the Clemson team and agreement on resolution or changes to the approved plan Any changes will be reflected in the documentation and final documents will be stored in the repository 9. Work Period Review and Implementation October 19, 2012 March 31, 2013 (~6 months) 10. Work Place All work will be completed at the client site unless otherwise agreed upon with the project manager. Clemson will provide reasonable workspaces with basic amenities including a work area with a high-speed Internet connection. 11. Security Issues A security badge will be provided by the client for needed building access. 12. Travel Travel, meals, lodging and all expenses must be included in the contractor s hourly rate. 13. Assumptions: 1. Clemson will provide relevant functional and technical resources with adequate skills and knowledge to support the performance of services throughout the duration of this review. 2. Clemson will assume project management responsibilities. Contractor will take direction and tasks from the Clemson University project manager. 13
580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIAL 1. AWARD CRITERIA: Offers will be evaluated using only the factors stated below. Evaluation factors are stated in the relative order of importance, with the first factor being the most important. Once evaluation is complete, all responsive Offertory will be ranked from most advantageous to least advantageous. A. Technical Proposal: The vendor s ability to provide a technical proposal that clearly outlines each step taken to address all deliverables in the scope of work. 30% B. Qualifications: The Offeror s experience, references and key staff must provide evidence of its depth and breadth of experience, and evidence of successful past performance with projects of this similar size and scope.30% C. Cost: Cost of the services provided by the vendor. 20% D. Timeline: Vendor s ability to meet the timeline included in the scope of work.20% V. APPENDICES TO SCOPE OF WORK Please note that Kuali Coeus / InfoEd Reporting requirements comprised of the following which may be found under Bid Attachments in online bid document. Excel Spreadsheet entitled Copy of Report Request Form Folder entitled Reports Details for SOW (this folder contains 14 Excel Files) Folder entitled Reports Details for SOW2 (this folder contains 5 Excel Files) Folder entitled InfoEd Compliance Modules Data Fields for Reporting (this folder contains 6 Excel Files) 14