Oklahoma City Public Schools Oklahoma
|
|
- Derrick Marsh
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Oklahoma City Public Schools Oklahoma PAGE DATA 2 Background Information 3 Trends in Overall Reading, Mathematics, and Science Proficiency READING 4 Reading Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level 5 Reading Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level 6 Reading Proficiency Gaps 7 Standardized Residuals for Reading MATHEMATICS 8 Mathematics Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level 9 Mathematics Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level 0 Mathematics Proficiency Gaps Standardized Residuals for Mathematics SCIENCE 2 Science Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level 3 Science Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level 4 Science Proficiency Gaps 5 Standardized Residuals for Science 6 High School Graduation Rates 7 College Readiness Data THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
2 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Background Information Description of district: District characteristics Locale Number of schools Student characteristics Enrollment 40,985 4,089 42,549 42,989 District size rank Percent low-income students Percent non-white students Percent of students by race/ethnicity African American Asian Hispanic White American Indian/Alaska Native Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander Two or more races Not reported Percent English language learners Percent students with disabilities District expenditures Total current expenditures per pupil $7,647 $8,065 $8,285 Instructional expenditures per pupil $4,69 $4,294 $4,558 State expenditures Total current expenditures per pupil $8,024 $8,232 $8,287 Instructional expenditures per pupil $4,320 $4,398 $4,430 SOURCE: Analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD) and from the U.S. Census Bureau. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability. See methodology section. As defined by CCD, locale code represents a large city, code 2 represents a midsize city, and code 2 represents a suburb of a large urban area. 2 District size rank is based on enrollment in local school districts in the 50 states and DC, and does not include other district types or territories. 3 Low-income students are defined as eligible for Free or Reduced-Price School Lunch (FRSL). 4 Prior to 20, some states combined Asian and Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander categories. 5 As of 20, all states reported a Two or more races category; however, some states began reporting this category as early as NOTES: CCD data for 202 and 20 expenditures data from the U.S. Census were not available at time of this analysis. Some student demographic data were provided by the state or district education agency. State test information: Grades included in analysis Subject/level Most recent test included in analysis Reading Elementary Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 Middle Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 High Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 Mathematics Elementary Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 Middle Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 6, 7, 8 High Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 Science Elementary Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) Middle Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) High Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT) 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 9, 0,, 2 SOURCE: State education agency. Not available. NOTES: Italicized values are not comparable to other years. In 202, the state reported data that contained the results of non-full academic year students, students with disabilities, and English language learners, making the results not comparable to previous years THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
3 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Trends in Overall Reading, Mathematics, and Science Proficiency Percentage of all students in the district and the state scoring at or above proficient in reading, mathematics, and science in elementary, middle, and high school: DISTRICT PROFICIENCY RATE Elementary Percent STATE PROFICIENCY RATE Elementary Percent Reading Mathematics Science Middle Percent Middle Percent High Percent High Percent SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: See tables on pages 4, 8 and 2 for details. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 3
4 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Reading Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at or above proficient in reading: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income High District All African American Asian 87 7 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
5 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Reading Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at the advanced 2 level in reading: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income High District All African American Asian 54 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. 2 Advanced includes any levels above proficient. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 5
6 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Reading Proficiency Gaps Percentage-point gaps in reading proficiency rates between disadvantaged and advantaged groups: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Middle Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income High Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: In the first four columns, negative numbers indicate an achievement gap, where the disadvantaged group performed lower than the advantaged group. (Positive numbers indicate the disadvantaged group performed higher than the advantaged group.) Negative average change values indicate the achievement gap widened; positive numbers indicate the achievement gap narrowed. change values appear in color when the gap is closing; details on the definition of a gap closure and average change are found in the methodology section. Details on the calculation of decile ranks are also found in the methodology section. 202 decile ranks appear in color when the 202 gap is among the 30 percent ( 3) of districts with the smallest gaps in the state. Decile ranks of average change appear in color when the average change in gaps is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state and meets the conditions for a gap closure. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
7 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Standardized Residuals for Reading Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in reading, controlling for district poverty level: Elementary Middle High Residual SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. NOTES: See below for details. Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in reading, controlling for district poverty level: Decile ranks 2 change 202 change Elementary Middle High Count of positive residuals in reading/total available 0/2 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/ Count of positive residuals in reading, mathematics, and science/total available 0/6 0/9 0/9 0/9 2/ SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability. See methodology section. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. 2 For the count of positive residuals rows, the decile rank is the average rank for the three education levels. NOTES: For details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks, see methodology section. Positive average change values and decile ranks in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state appear in color. Counts of residuals also appear in color when all available residuals are positive. At the high school level, the percentage values of non-low income test takers for 2009 were unreliable and residual results were suppressed. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 7
8 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Mathematics Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at or above proficient in mathematics: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income High District All African American Asian 88 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
9 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Mathematics Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at the advanced 2 level in mathematics: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income High District All African American Asian 70 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. 2 Advanced includes any levels above proficient. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 9
10 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Mathematics Proficiency Gaps Percentage-point gaps in mathematics proficiency rates between disadvantaged and advantaged groups: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Middle Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income High Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: In the first four columns, negative numbers indicate an achievement gap, where the disadvantaged group performed lower than the advantaged group. (Positive numbers indicate the disadvantaged group performed higher than the advantaged group.) Negative average change values indicate the achievement gap widened; positive numbers indicate the achievement gap narrowed. change values appear in color when the gap is closing; details on the definition of a gap closure and average change are found in the methodology section. Details on the calculation of decile ranks are also found in the methodology section. 202 decile ranks appear in color when the 202 gap is among the 30 percent ( 3) of districts with the smallest gaps in the state. Decile ranks of average change appear in color when the average change in gaps is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state and meets the conditions for a gap closure. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
11 Standardized Residuals for Mathematics The 203 Broad Prize for Urban Education Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in mathematics, controlling for district poverty level: Elementary Middle High Residual SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. NOTES: See below for details. Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in mathematics, controlling for district poverty level: Decile ranks 2 change 202 change Elementary Middle High Count of positive residuals in mathematics/total available 0/2 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/ Count of positive residuals in reading, mathematics, and science/total available 0/6 0/9 0/9 0/9 2/ SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability. See methodology section. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. 2 For the count of positive residuals rows, the decile rank is the average rank for the three education levels. NOTES: For details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks, see methodology section. Positive average change values and decile ranks in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state appear in color. Counts of residuals also appear in color when all available residuals are positive. At the high school level, the percentage values of non-low income test takers for 2009 were unreliable and residual results were suppressed. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION
12 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Science Performance and Improvement at the Proficient or Above Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at or above proficient in science: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income High District All African American Asian 85 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Fluctuations in the numbers of students tested on the high school science test may have affected the percent of students scoring proficient or above in 2009, 200, and 20. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
13 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Science Performance and Improvement at the Advanced Level Percentage of students in the district and the state scoring at the advanced 2 level in science: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income Middle District All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income 9 0 Non-low income High District All African American Asian 45 Hispanic White Low income Non-low income State All African American Asian Hispanic White Low income Non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. 2 Advanced includes any levels above proficient. NOTES: Details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks are found in the methodology section. Positive change values appear in color. Decile ranks appear in color when the district s 202 performance or average change in proficiency is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state. Fluctuations in the numbers of students tested on the high school science test may have affected the percent of students scoring proficient or above in 2009, 200, and 20. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 3
14 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Science Proficiency Gaps Percentage-point gaps in science proficiency rates between disadvantaged and advantaged groups: Decile ranks change 202 change Elementary Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Middle Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income High Internal district gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income Internal district vs. internal state gap African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income External gap: district disadvantaged vs. state advantaged African American vs. White Hispanic vs. White Low income vs. non-low income SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of test takers at a level. See methodology section. Calculation could not be performed due to a change in the state test. Unless otherwise indicated in the NOTES section below, state values exclude the district s results; see methodology section. NOTES: In the first four columns, negative numbers indicate an achievement gap, where the disadvantaged group performed lower than the advantaged group. (Positive numbers indicate the disadvantaged group performed higher than the advantaged group.) Negative average change values indicate the achievement gap widened; positive numbers indicate the achievement gap narrowed. change values appear in color when the gap is closing; details on the definition of a gap closure and average change are found in the methodology section. Details on the calculation of decile ranks are also found in the methodology section. 202 decile ranks appear in color when the 202 gap is among the 30 percent ( 3) of districts with the smallest gaps in the state. Decile ranks of average change appear in color when the average change in gaps is in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state and meets the conditions for a gap closure. Fluctuations in the numbers of students tested on the high school science test may have affected the percent of students scoring proficient or above in 2009, 200, and 20. Italicized values are not comparable to other years. A change in reporting standards in 202 affected the data comparability to previous years; see lower table on page 2 for details THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
15 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA Standardized Residuals for Science Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in science, controlling for district poverty level: Elementary Middle High Residual SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. NOTES: See below for details. Standardized residuals for regressions of the percentage of students in the district scoring at or above proficient in science, controlling for district poverty level: Decile ranks 2 change 202 change Elementary Middle High Count of positive residuals in science/total available 0/2 0/3 0/3 0/3 2/ Count of positive residuals in reading, mathematics, and science/total available 0/6 0/9 0/9 0/9 2/ SOURCE: Analysis of state test data. Not available. Data were suppressed due to unreliability. See methodology section. Positive residuals indicate higher-than-expected performance, and negative residuals indicate lower-than-expected performance, given the district s poverty level. Residuals are expressed in standard units. Regressions were weighted by district size. 2 For the count of positive residuals rows, the decile rank is the average rank for the three education levels. NOTES: For details on the calculation of average change and decile ranks, see methodology section. Positive average change values and decile ranks in the top 30 percent ( 3) of the state appear in color. Counts of residuals also appear in color when all available residuals are positive. At the high school level, the percentage values of non-low income test takers for 2009 were unreliable and residual results were suppressed. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 5
16 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA High School Graduation Rates Three estimated high school graduation rates: Percent d Freshman Graduation Rate Urban Institute Method Manhattan Institute Method All students African American Asian Hispanic White Estimated high school graduation rates for the classes of change of the three graduation rate measures All African American Asian Hispanic White d Freshman Graduation Rate All African American Asian Hispanic White Urban Institute method All African American Asian Hispanic White Manhattan Institute method All African American Asian Hispanic White SOURCE: Analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD). Not available. Data were suppressed if a subgroup represented less than 5 percent of the population or due to unreliability; rules vary by method. See methodology section. The Urban Institute method is also known as Swanson s cumulative promotion index (SCPI) and the Manhattan Institute method is also known as Greene s graduation indicator (GGI). NOTES: Gaps in lines represent missing or suppressed data. of the three graduation rates is based on the average of any available values from the three individual methods. Positive change values appear in color. Details on the calculation of average change are found in the methodology section. Diploma counts for 200 or later were not released in time for this year s analysis. For districts that were eligible for The 202 Broad Prize, results are generally the same as those reported last year. Some graduation rates were suppressed because enrollment numbers were considered unreliable THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
17 Oklahoma City Public Schools OKLAHOMA College Readiness Data Test scores and participation rates for college readiness examinations: change SAT Reasoning Test Mean total score (reading, mathematics, and writing) All,658,65 African American,446 Asian,63 Hispanic White,779,736 Participation rate All 4 3 African American 2 Asian Hispanic White 7 5 ACT Mean composite score (English, reading, mathematics, and science) All African American Asian Hispanic White Participation rate All African American Asian Hispanic White Advanced Placement (AP) (all subjects) 2 Percent of tests taken with scores of 3 or above All 3 33 African American 3 3 Asian Hispanic White Participation rate All 4 3 African American 0 7 Asian Hispanic 0 2 White 6 8 SOURCE: Analysis of data from the Common Core of Data (CCD), ACT, and the College Board (copyright The College Board. Not available. Test scores were suppressed if fewer than 5 students took the test. Participation rates were suppressed due to unreliability or if the subgroup represented less than 5 percent of district enrollment in the relevant grades. Results for subgroups were suppressed when less than 90 percent of all test takers racial/ethnic identity was reported. See methodology section. Describes the most recent test results for graduating seniors. 2 Describes test results for juniors and seniors taking any AP test in the given year. NOTES: Subgroup participation rates may not reflect the all students rate due to some test takers not reporting their race/ethnicity. Positive change values appear in color. Details on the calculation of average change are found in the methodology section. CCD data for 202 were not available at the time of this analysis; participation rates for 202 were estimated using 20 enrollment data. This district did not authorize the release of any 20 or 202 College Board or ACT data. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 7
18 Understanding the Data Report This data report contains all of the data collected and analyzed for this district for the purpose of selecting The Broad Prize finalists. Tables of summarized results for all the eligible districts and three former winners, which can be used for making comparisons of this district s performance and improvement with other eligible districts, are also publicly available on the Broad Prize web site at The Broad Prize finalists are determined by a panel of education experts from around the country, based on a review of the data and analyses for the 75 Broad Prize-eligible districts. Neither a strict formula nor set of weighting factors is applied to the various analyses calculated. Broad Prize Review Board members consider all of the data and analyses available and, based on each member s knowledge and expertise, select four finalists. The Review Board considers both performance as of the most recent year and improvement over the four most recent years on the various measures included in this report. The rest of this section discusses the data collection and analysis procedures used to produce the data report. First, it describes the criteria and data sources for identifying the eligible districts. Second, it reviews each of the quantitative achievement measures that the Review Board used in March 203 to identify the four finalists and the data on which the measures were based. Eligible Districts To be eligible for The Broad Prize, school districts must meet certain criteria set by The Broad Foundation that are related to district size, poverty, and urbanicity. Winners from the previous three years were ineligible. The criteria for eligibility in 203 were as follows: K 2 districts serving at least 42,500 students that have at least 40 percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price school lunch (FRSL), at least 40 percent of students from minority groups, and an urban designation (Locale Code, 2, or 2 in the CCD ) were identified. In states where more than 0 districts qualify under these criteria, only the 0 largest qualifying districts are eligible (70 districts met these criteria in 203). In states with no districts meeting the above criteria, the next largest districts in the nation with at least 40 percent FRSL, at least 40 percent minority, and an urban designation were identified, in order to bring the total number of eligible districts to 75. Only one district per state can qualify under these criteria (5 districts were included in 203 based on these criteria). 2 CCD locale code represents a large city; code 2 represents a mid-size city; and code 2 represents a large suburb. Sable, J. (2008). Documentation to the NCES Common Core of Data Local Education Agency Universe Survey: School Year Version a (NCES ). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. 2 These include Indianapolis, Indiana; Des Moines, Iowa; Norfolk, Virginia; St. Paul, Minnesota; and Newark, New Jersey THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
19 For The 203 Broad Prize, data on school district demographics obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Common Core of Data (CCD) for 20 (the most recent year for which data were available) were used to determine the list of 75 eligible districts. The 75 eligible school districts were located in 3 states and the District of Columbia. 3 Data Used for Measures of Student Achievement Detailed data on various measures of student achievement were obtained for each district from federal and state records and other sources. Wherever possible, data were collected by grade level; race/ethnicity (African American, Asian, Hispanic, and White); and income status (low income and non-low income). The achievement data examined included performance on state achievement tests, estimated graduation rates based on federal counts of high school enrollments and completions, and college readiness data obtained from the College Board and ACT. Reading, Mathematics, and Science Proficiency as Determined by State Tests Key indicators of student performance include scores on state-mandated achievement tests used for federal accountability and trends in these scores over time. Proficiency data in reading, mathematics, and science were collected from each state for 2009 through These data were used to calculate the percentage of students in each district scoring at or above proficient levels on state-mandated tests in reading, mathematics, and science in each of grades 3 through 2 where available. Weighted by the number of test takers at each grade level, these data on student achievement were aggregated across elementary grades (3 5), middle grades (6 8), and high school grades (9 2). These state assessment data were analyzed (using methods described later) to calculate actual versus expected performance, to directly compare district performance with other districts in the same state, and to measure gaps and changes in gaps between low- and non-low-income students as well as between White and African American students and White and Hispanic students. Important Note Regarding State Test Data Because states establish their own assessment and proficiency standards, districts performance on state tests cannot be directly compared across states. To provide context for these data, summary tables containing information about state or district performance on recent administrations of the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), the NAEP Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA), and a Northwestern Evaluation Association (NWEA) proficiency-standards mapping study (ongoing since 2006) were provided to the Review Board and are available online at but are not included in this data report. 3 States without eligible districts this year were Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Hawaii was ineligible because it has a statewide school system. 4 The data were provided directly by state agencies or downloaded from their websites. PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 9
20 High School Graduation Rates Another key measure of a district s performance is the graduation rate. While using longitudinal student data generates the most accurate graduation rate, such data are not currently available from most states. In the absence of longitudinal data, cross-sectional data can be used to generate estimates of rates of on-time high school graduation. There are several methods generally considered to be reliable estimators of graduation rates, three of which are used in this report and are described in the next section on methods of analysis. To generate estimates that are comparable across the 75 Broad Prize-eligible districts, RTI obtains diploma counts and enrollment data for the districts from the federal CCD. The data used to create graduation rate estimates include total and subgroup enrollments and completion counts for each district for the high school classes of 2006 through 2009 (the most recent years that were available at time of analysis). The different methods vary in terms of the specific years of enrollment data used in the calculations. It should be noted that district diploma counts for 200 were not released in time for The 203 Broad Prize analysis. Therefore, the same range of years reported for the 202 Broad Prize (2006 to 2009) was included for the Review Board s review in 203. College Readiness Measures Measures of students college readiness include participation rates and scores for SAT and ACT as well as Advanced Placement (AP) participation and passing rates. These tests are designed to assess readiness for college-level work. Scale scores for each SAT subject (reading, writing, and mathematics) range from 200 to 800. Scale scores for the composite ACT test (covering English, mathematics, reading, and science) range from to 36. With schools permission, the College Board (which administers SAT) and ACT provided mean test scores for each district for 2009 through 202, along with the number of seniors who had taken the test (regardless of when they took the test during high school). 5 Another measure of college readiness is the extent to which students take and pass AP examinations. These examinations provide a standardized measure of student performance in college-level courses taken while in high school. AP grades are reported on a five-point scale: 5 = Extremely well qualified 4 = Well qualified 3 = Qualified (equivalent to passing) 2 = Possibly qualified = No recommendation Again, with permission from each district, the College Board provided data for the district for 2009 through 202 on the number of AP examinations taken by juniors and seniors and the number of passing scores (3 or above). Exam passing rates were calculated using these data, with the number of exams taken used as the denominator. 5 When students had taken the test more than once, the most recent score was reported THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL
21 The College Board also provided the number of juniors and seniors who took the test. RTI staff used these numbers to calculate percentages of AP examinations with scores of 3 or above (equivalent to pass rates) for each district. The College Board and ACT do not calculate test participation rates. RTI staff calculated participation rates using enrollment data obtained from the federal CCD for th- and 2th-graders as appropriate, in combination with the number of students taking the tests from the relevant year as the numerator. Because the most recent year of enrollment data available from the CCD was 20, participation rates for 202 were estimated using enrollment counts for 20. Data Analysis Methods The Broad Prize data report presents data collected on district characteristics and background information on state tests. In addition, RTI staff analyzed the data described above on student achievement to develop measures of the following: district proficiency rates (at both the proficient or above level and the advanced level) compared with other districts in the state; achievement gaps; standardized residuals; graduation rates; and college readiness. Trend data are presented where available, as are performance and improvement measures. Each data report section is explained here, and the relevant report page numbers are indicated in parentheses. Additional explanatory notes are included as footnotes in the data report itself. Each data report section is explained in further detail below, and the relevant report page numbers are indicated in parentheses. Additional explanatory notes are included as footnotes in the data report itself. General approaches applied to the analyses are explained directly below. Calculating Performance and Improvement Trend data are presented where available, as are performance and improvement measures. Performance indicators reflect the most recent year reported for any given measure. If the most recent year s data for a performance measure were not available or were suppressed for a district, no performance indicator was reported. Improvement indicators generally reflect average change over the four most recent years of available data for each measure. change was calculated as the slope of the best fit line among available data points, generally determined by regressing the relevant outcome measure on year. 6 If only one data point was available, or if data were missing for both of the two most recent years, average change was not calculated. Standardized residuals were used in average change calculations, regardless of any changes in state tests from 2009 to 202, as long as a test change was implemented statewide. This practice was followed because of the relative nature of the measure. Standardized residuals indicate a district s performance relative to that of districts in the state in a given year regardless of the particular test administered that year. Trends in student achievement rates, however, can be affected by year-to-year changes in state tests. Therefore proficiency rates, advanced proficiency rates, or achievement gap measures in a given year were excluded from trend analyses when there were changes in state testing standards or policies. 6 When only two data points were available, the slope was equal to (X 2 X )/(Year 2 Year ). PREPARED BY RTI INTERNATIONAL 203 THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD FOUNDATION 2
San Diego Unified School District California
San Diego Unified School District California PAGE DATA 2 Background Information 3 Trends in Overall Reading, Mathematics, and Science Proficiency READING 4 Reading Performance and Improvement at the Proficient
More informationBroward County Public Schools Florida
Broward County Public Schools Florida PAGE DATA 2 Background Information 3 Trends in Overall Reading, Mathematics, and Science Proficiency READING 4 Reading Performance and Improvement at the Proficient
More informationAPPENDIX A. Tables. Appendix A Tables 119
118 The Condition of Education 2012 APPENDIX A Tables Appendix A Tables 119 Indicator 1 Enrollment Trends by Age Table A-1-1. Percentage of the population ages 3 34 enrolled in school, by age group: October
More informationBUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Small Business Ownership Description Total number of employer firms and self-employment in the state per 100 people in the labor force, 2003. Explanation Business ownership
More informationNCES 2011-034 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
NCES 2011-034 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The Condition of Education 2011 in Brief MAY 2011 Editors Susan Aud National Center for Education Statistics Gretchen Hannes American Institutes for Research
More informationPublic School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution
Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Mode Alabama Percent of Teachers FY Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile
More informationSTATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF
District of Columbia STATE DATA CENTER MONTHLY BRIEF N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 District Residents Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2010 By Minwuyelet Azimeraw Joy Phillips, Ph.D. This report is based on data
More informationIdentifying Top Performing High Schools for the Best High Schools Rankings
Identifying Top Performing High Schools for the Best High Schools Rankings Analytical Methodology and Technical Appendices Prepared for U.S. News & World Report by RTI International May 2015 Acknowledgments
More informationImpacts of Sequestration on the States
Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds
More informationNON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST
NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST ** Utilize this list to determine whether or not a non-resident applicant may waive the Oklahoma examination or become licensed
More informationCensus Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009
March of Dimes Foundation Office of Government Affairs 1146 19 th Street, NW, 6 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone (202) 659-1800 Fax (202) 296-2964 marchofdimes.com nacersano.org Census Data on Uninsured
More informationSTATISTICAL BRIEF #273
STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 December 29 Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 28 Beth Levin Crimmel, M.S. Introduction Employees of state and
More informationThree-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access
Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana
More informationChex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:
Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Security Freeze Table AA, AP and AE Military addresses*
More informationApril 2014. For Kids Sake: State-Level Trends in Children s Health Insurance. A State-by-State Analysis
April 2014 For Kids Sake: State-Level Trends in Children s Health Insurance A State-by-State Analysis 2 STATE HEALTH ACCESS DATA ASSISTANCE CENTER Contents Executive Summary... 4 Introduction... 5 National
More informationWhat to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL
What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules Paul Swanson, MBA, CPA Instructor of Accounting John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Kevin Berry, PhD, Assistant Professor of Accounting
More informationWest Virginia. Next Steps. Life After Special Education
West Virginia Next Steps Life After Special Education A Special Supplement to Education Week s DIPLOMAS COUNT 2015 West Virginia State Graduation Brief 2015 A special supplement to Education Week s Diplomas
More informationSECTION 1. Participation in Education
The indicators in this section of The Condition of Education report trends in enrollments across all levels of education. Enrollment is a key indicator of the scope of and access to educational opportunities
More informationYES Prep Public Schools
The Broad Prize for Public Charter Schools 2012 Winner Profile: YES Prep Public Schools June 21, 2012 National Charter Schools Conference Minneapolis, Minn. Winner of the Inaugural Broad Prize for Public
More informationEducational Attainment in the United States: 2003
Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003 Population Characteristics Issued June 2004 P20-550 The population in the United States is becoming more educated, but significant differences in educational
More informationEnhancing Educational Attainment in Arizona
Enhancing Educational Attainment in Arizona Status Report on the 2002 Changing Directions Policy of the Arizona Board of Regents at Arizona State University February 2006 Chance for College in the U.S.
More informationSchool to College. Alaska DIPLOMAS COUNT. Can State P-16 Councils Ease the Transition? 2008 With Support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Alaska School to College Can State P-16 Councils Ease the Transition? A Special Supplement to Education Week s DIPLOMAS COUNT 2008 With Support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation About Diplomas Count
More informationState Tax Information
State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither
More informationUniversity System of Georgia Enrollment Trends and Projections to 2018
University System of Georgia Enrollment Trends and Projections to 2018 Introduction: Projections of USG Headcount Enrollment Enrollment projections use past trends and information on other variables to
More informationPart II: Special Education Revenues and Expenditures
State Special Education Finance Systems, 1999-2000 Part II: Special Education Revenues and Expenditures Thomas Parrish, Jenifer Harr, Jean Wolman, Jennifer Anthony, Amy Merickel, and Phil Esra March 2004
More informationWorkers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability
ALABAMA Alabama State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Alabama 1-2 Weeks ALASKA ARIZONA Arizona State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Arizona 7-8 Weeks by mail By Mail ARKANSAS
More informationNet-Temps Job Distribution Network
Net-Temps Job Distribution Network The Net-Temps Job Distribution Network is a group of 25,000 employment-related websites with a local, regional, national, industry and niche focus. Net-Temps customers'
More informationAttachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based
Attachment A The following table provides information on student teaching requirements across several states. There are several models for these requirements; minimum number of weeks, number of required
More informationHighlights and Trends: ASHA Counts for Year End 2009
Highlights and Trends: ASHA Counts for Year End 2009 Constituents -- How many are there? How have the numbers changed? v ASHA currently represents 140,039 speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and
More informationIn Brief. Contraception Counts: Ranking State Efforts
In Brief 2006 Series, No. 1 Contraception Counts: ing Efforts Unintended pregnancy is a major public health and social problem in the United s. Of the six million pregnancies that occur among American
More informationData Collection Summary
Education for Children and Youths Program Data Collection Summary From the School Year 2011 12 Federally Required State Data Collection for the McKinney Vento Education Assistance Improvements Act of 2001
More informationHigh School Graduation Rate Approaching Milestone, Reaches Highest Point in 40 Years
` EMBARGOED UNTIL: JUNE 6, 2013, 12:01 a.m. EDT CONTACT: Tim Ebner, (301) 280-3100, CommDesk@epe.org High School Graduation Rate Approaching Milestone, Reaches Highest Point in 40 Years Report Examines
More informationSTATISTICAL BRIEF #435
STATISTICAL BRIEF #435 April 2014 Premiums and Employee Contributions for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance: Private versus Public Sector, 2012 Karen E. Davis, MA Introduction Employer-sponsored health
More informationReal Progress in Food Code Adoption
Real Progress in Food Code Adoption The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food Code adoptions by
More informationState Tax Information
State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither
More informationMAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)
HAWAII () IDAHO () Illinois () MAINE () Maryland () MASSACHUSETTS () NEBRASKA () NEVADA (Carson ) NEW HAMPSHIRE () OHIO () OKLAHOMA ( ) OREGON () TEXAS () UTAH ( ) VERMONT () ALABAMA () COLORADO () INDIANA
More informationOnline Appendix. Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program
Online Appendix Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program Data Appendix This appendix section provides further details about the data and the construction of the
More informationJOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE DEMOCRATS
JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE DEMOCRATS SENATOR JACK REED (D-RI) RANKING DEMOCRAT ECONOMIC POLICY BRIEF SEPTEMBER 2005 THE NUMBER OFAMERICANS WITHOUT HEALTH INSURANCE GREW BY 860,000 IN 2004, INCREASING FOR
More information$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants
School Readiness: High-Quality Early Learning Head Start $10.5 $9.5 $10.1 +$1.5 +17.7% $8.5 $7.5 +$2.1 +27.0% $6.5 for fiscal year 2010 Included in the budget is $1.078 billion to ensure that every Head
More informationOKLAHOMA $3,567,533 in Academic Competitiveness (AC) Grants awarded to 4,754 students
OKLAHOMA $3,567,533 in Academic Competitiveness (AC) Grants awarded to 4,754 students $2,941,144 in National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent (SMART) Grants awarded to 970 students For AC
More informationHigh Risk Health Pools and Plans by State
High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State State Program Contact Alabama Alabama Health 1-866-833-3375 Insurance Plan 1-334-263-8311 http://www.alseib.org/healthinsurance/ahip/ Alaska Alaska Comprehensive
More informationTechnical note. Data Sources
Technical note This site provides composition and segregation indices for public school children in the elementary grades (kindergarten through six). Children are classified into four major racial/ethnic
More informationLicensure Resources by State
Licensure Resources by State Alabama Alabama State Board of Social Work Examiners http://socialwork.alabama.gov/ Alaska Alaska Board of Social Work Examiners http://commerce.state.ak.us/dnn/cbpl/professionallicensing/socialworkexaminers.as
More informationSummary Enrollment Report, which can be accessed at http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2014/marketplaceenrollment/apr2014/ib_2014apr_enrollment.pdf.
ASPE ISSUE BRIEF HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE 2015 OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD: JANUARY ENROLLMENT REPORT For the period: November 15, 2014 January 16, 2015 1 January 27, 2015 The Health Insurance Marketplace
More informationFACTBOOK. The Condition. Excelencia in Education www.edexcelencia.org
FACTBOOK The Condition Education2015 of Latinos in Excelencia in Education www.edexcelencia.org 1 THE CONDITION OF LATINOS IN EDUCATION: 2015 FACTBOOK JANUARY 2015 COMPILED BY: Deborah A. Santiago, COO
More informationDemographic Profile of ASHA Members Providing Bilingual Services March 2016
Demographic Profile of ASHA Members Providing Bilingual Services March 2016 Introduction State data on the number of bilingual speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and audiologists are frequently requested
More informationList of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds
List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds On November 26, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-297,
More informationAmerican C.E. Requirements
American C.E. Requirements Alaska Board of Nursing Two of the following: 30 contact hours 30 hours of professional nursing activities 320 hours of nursing employment Arizona State Board of Nursing Arkansas
More informationHealth Coverage by Race and Ethnicity: The Potential Impact of the Affordable Care Act
on on medicaid and and the the uninsured Health Coverage by Race and Ethnicity: The Potential Impact of the Affordable Care Act Executive Summary March 2013 One of the key goals of the Affordable Care
More informationEnglishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.
Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Search Term Position 1 Accent Reduction Programs in USA 1 2 American English for Business Students 1 3 American English for Graduate Students
More informationKANSAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS 1420 SW Arrowhead Road, Topeka, Kan. 66604 785.273.3600 800.432.2471 www.kasb.org
KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS 1420 SW Arrowhead Road, Topeka, Kan. 66604 785.273.3600 800.432.2471 www.kasb.org Special Report: February, 2014 School Funding, At-Risk and All-Day Kindergarten and
More informationTHE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS
THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE September 17, 2015 1 Let s talk about higher education in Texas and the educational competitiveness
More informationTeacher Diversity Revisited
Teacher Diversity Revisited A New State-by-State Analysis By Ulrich Boser May 2014 In the fall of 2011, the Center for American Progress released an issue brief looking at teacher diversity, and the findings
More informationHealth Coverage for the Hispanic Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act
on on medicaid and and the the uninsured Health Coverage for the Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act April 2013 Over 50 million s currently live in the United States, comprising 17 percent
More informationState Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011
State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 Alabama http://alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/agr/mcword10agr9.pdf Alabama Pest Control Alaska http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20aac%2090.pdf
More informationData show key role for community colleges in 4-year
Page 1 of 7 (https://www.insidehighered.com) Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year degree production Submitted by Doug Lederman on September 10, 2012-3:00am The notion that community colleges
More informationSocial Work Salaries by Race & Ethnicity
N A S W C e n t e r f o r W o r k f o r c e S t u d i e s & S o c i a l W o r k P r a c t i c e Social Work Salaries by Race & Ethnicity occupational profile 2011 National Association of Social Workers.
More informationChanges in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans, 2007-2008
Issue Brief November 2007 Changes in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans, 2007-2008 BY JOSHUA LANIER AND DEAN BAKER* The average premium for Medicare Part D prescription drug plans rose by 24.5
More information********************
THE SURETY & FIDELITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1101 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D. C. 20036 Phone: (202) 463-0600 Fax: (202) 463-0606 Web page: www.surety.org APPLICATION Application
More information2014-2015 Program Director Survey: Traditional Program
Semester Quarter Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 29 2014-2015 Program Director Survey: Traditional Program What type of calendar system is your program on? Sequences Sequential Terms Two 8-week
More information2009-10 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS. By Jacek Cianciara
2009-10 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS By Jacek Cianciara Wisconsin Department of Revenue Division of Research and Policy December 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Findings 3 Introduction
More informationTHE WTCHR ENROLLMENT SUMMARY January 31, 2005
THE WTCHR ENROLLMENT SUMMARY January 31, 2005 This report summarizes the enrollment characteristics of all 71,609* people who registered with the World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR). Enrollment
More informationState-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Effective 10/16/11: Producers holding a life line of authority on or before 10/16/11 who sell or wish to sell
More informationSTATISTICAL BRIEF #137
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey STATISTICAL BRIEF #137 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality August 26 Treatment of Sore Throats: Antibiotic Prescriptions and Throat Cultures for Children under 18
More informationSpecial Education Reform: Basics for SLTs
Special Education Reform: Basics for SLTs Introduction This overview is designed to explain the New York City Department of Education s special education reform and how it relates to your school. We will
More informationMedicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile
Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile The National Summary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Introduction... 1 Data Source and General Notes... 2 Types and Ages of Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees...
More informationU.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics Overall Trends, Trends by Race and Ethnicity And State-by-State Information
U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics Overall Trends, Trends by Race and Ethnicity And State-by-State Information The Alan Guttmacher Institute 120 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005 www.guttmacher.org Updated
More informationExploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide
Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Overview of AHA RACTrac Survey Results, 4 th Quarter 2010 For complete report go to: http://www.aha.org/aha/issues/rac/ractrac.html Agenda
More informationNurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011
Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified
More informationTHE CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS REPORTING STATE CHILDREN S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE IN THE MARCH 2001 CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY 1
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS REPORTING STATE CHILDREN S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE IN THE MARCH 2001 CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY 1 Charles Nelson and Robert Mills HHES Division, U.S. Bureau of the
More informationAcceptable Certificates from States other than New York
Alabama 2 2 Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Teacher Yes Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Support Services Yes Alaska 2 Regular Certificate, Type A 5 Years, renewable Teacher Yes At least
More informationHow To Calculate College Enrollment In The United States
EDUCATION POLICY BRIEF May 2008 The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government The public policy research arm of the State University of New York The States and Their Community Colleges Every state
More informationNevada Association of School Boards Post Office Box 14855 Reno, NV 89507-4855 Telephone 775/657-8411 Fax 775/453-1017 Visit our website www.nvasb.
Nevada Association of School Boards Post Office Box 14855 Reno, NV 89507-4855 Telephone 775/657-8411 Fax 775/453-1017 Visit our website www.nvasb.org March 2013 Dear Policymaker: NASB envisions success
More informationother distance education innovations, have changed distance education offerings.
WEB TABLES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION JUNE 2014 NCES 2014-023 Enrollment in Distance Education Courses, by State: Fall 2012 Postsecondary enrollment in, particularly those offered online, has rapidly increased
More informationQuality Counts Introduces New State Report Card; U.S. Earns C, and Massachusetts Ranks First in Nation
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL: Jan. 8, 2015, 12:01 a.m. EST CONTACT: Sean Chalk, (301) 280-3100, CommDesk@epe.org Quality Counts Introduces New State Report Card; U.S. Earns C, and Massachusetts Ranks First
More informationNAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State
Select a state below to display the current regulation and requirements, or continue to scroll down. Light grey text signifies states that have not adopted an annuity training program. Alabama Illinois
More informationThe Obama Administration and Community Health Centers
The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers Community health centers are a critical source of health care for millions of Americans particularly those in underserved communities. Thanks primarily
More informationInstitution: University of Connecticut (129020) Part C Selection
Fall Enrollment 2013-14 Overview Fall Enrollment Overview The Fall Enrollment component collects student enrollment counts by level of student, enrollment status, gender and race/ethnicity. In addition,
More informationOverview of School Choice Policies
Overview of School Choice Policies Tonette Salazar, Director of State Relations Micah Wixom, Policy Analyst CSG West Education Committee July 29, 2015 Who we are The essential, indispensable member of
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2013. American Indian Students
The Condition of College & Career Readiness 13 Indian Students Indian Students The Condition of College & Career Readiness 13 ACT has been measuring college readiness trends for several years. The Condition
More informationThe Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of U.S. Public Schools
Report AUGUST 30, 2007 The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of U.S. Public Schools Richard Fry Senior Research Associate, Pew Hispanic Center The recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions on school desegregation
More informationThe National Progress Report on e-prescribing and Safe-Rx Rankings
The National Progress Report on e-prescribing and Safe-Rx Rankings YEAR 2012 neutrality transparency physician and patient choice open standards collaboration privacy THE national progress report ON E-prescribing
More informationEducational Attainment: Understanding the Data
Educational Attainment: Understanding the Data Sandy Baum George Washington University Alisa Federico Cunningham Independent Consultant Courtney Tanenbaum American Institutes for Research working paper
More informationWho May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?
State Statutes Series Current Through February 2006 Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption? In order for an adoption to take place, a person available to be adopted must be placed in
More informationThe Performance and State Policies Of Higher Education in Illinois: Insights from a Five- State Policy Review Project
The Performance and State Policies Of Higher Education in Illinois: Insights from a Five- State Policy Review Project Laura W. Perna Joni Finney Patrick Callan With Assistance from: Michael Armijo, Jamey
More informationState by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement
State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement THE FOLLOWING ARE ONLY GENERAL SUMMARIES OF THE PRACTICE ACTS EACH STATE HAS REGARDING CONSERVATIVE SHARP DEBRIDEMENT
More informationThe 2008 Edition of Education Statistics
I e....5..... r'.~ational CÊNTËlt FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Iris:lí1ute of EducatIon Sciences U.S. Department of Education NCES 2009-020 Digest of Education Statistics 2008 March 2009 Thomas D. Snyder National
More informationNurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014
Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified
More informationA Comparison of Indiana and American Test Scoring
Academic Preparation and College Success: Analyses of Indiana s 2000 High School Class IPAS Research Report #04-03 Indiana Project on Academic Success ipasresearch-based inquiry for enhancing academic
More information2014 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database
THE CAHPS DATABASE 214 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database 214 Chartbook: What Consumers Say About Their Experiences with Their Health Plans and Medical Care AHRQ Contract No.: HHSA292133C Managed and prepared
More informationDetail on mathematics graduation requirements from public high schools, by state as of June 5, 2013
Detail on mathematics graduation requirements from public high schools, by state as of June 5, 2013 State Year in Effect Algebra II required Years of Math Alignment Comments/Explanations Alabama 2011-12
More informationSTATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Annuity Training Requirement Currently Effective Initial 8-Hour Annuity Training Requirement:
More informationFor Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525
For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525 2012 CMT, CAPT RESULTS SHOW SOME INCREASES, WHILE GAPS IN ACHIEVEMENT PERSIST The Connecticut State Department of Education
More informationData Collection Summary
Education for Homeless Children Youths Program Data Collection Summary From the School Year 2010-11 Federally Required State Data Collection for the McKinney-Vento Education Assistance Improvements Act
More informationADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD
ASPE Issue BRIEF ADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD For the period: October 1, 2013 March 31, 2014 (Including Additional
More informationState Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11
Alabama Alaska Ai Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Initial 8 Hour Annuity Training Requirement: Prior to selling annuities in California,
More informationTrends in High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 1972 2009
IES 2012-006 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Trends in High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 1972 2009 Compendium Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Trends in High School
More informationThe High Cost of High School Dropouts: What the Nation Pays for Inadequate High Schools
The High Cost of High School Dropouts: What the Nation Pays for Inadequate High Schools Every school day, nearly 7,000 students become dropouts. Annually, that adds up to about 1.2 million students who
More informationMany students attend more than one institution of higher education before they earn a
Hot Topics in Higher Education State Policies to Improve Student Transfer By Brenda Bautsch January 2013 Many students attend more than one institution of higher education before they earn a degree. According
More information