La partecipazione italiana nel bando climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials

Transcription

1 La partecipazione italiana nel bando climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials Carlo Barbante, Rappresentante nazionale per Climate Action, Environment, Resource Efficiency and Raw Materials IDPA-CNR e Universita Ca Foscari - Venezia barbante@unive.it

2 The Team Capo Gabinetto MINISTRO Cons. Dipl. STRATEGY ESP ad hoc APRE AS RPUE DUAR Segr. Tecnica COORDINATION ACTIONS EPR UNI REG IMP National Representatives D 1 D 2 D 3 D 13 D 14 NCP1 APRE ESP1a ESP1b ESP1c NCP14 APRE ESP14a ESP14b ESP14c Utbildningsdepartementet

3 How many applications have been received? Number of eligible applications to H2020 per EU Member State First 100 calls

4 Applications received in SC5 Number of eligible applications to SC5 per EU Member State ~2/3 of EU MS participations

5 Applications per country compared with FP7 Horizon 2020 compared with FP7

6 What is the rate of applications by country? Number of eligible applications to Horizon 2020 per capita

7 Percentage of proposals received funding? Success rate of eligible full proposals to Horizon 2020

8 Success rates of the different Member States? Success rates for applications to Horizon 2020 per EU Member State avg

9 Member State s success rate compared with FP7 Success rate as percentage of eligible applications: H2020 vsfp7 Avg FP7 Avg H2020

10 Which types of organisations applied to H2020? Number of applications to Horizon 2020 per type of organisation

11 Origin of project coordinators in SC5 53 organisations from 3 EU countries are coordinating 52% of the 102 selected projects Organisations from 17 countries are coordinating 102 projects 1 project is coordinated by an organisation from an Associated Country

12 Share of H2020 funding received Share of EU financial contribution to participants in signed grant agreements: Horizon 2020 compared with FP7

13 How did different types of organisations fare in terms of grant agreements? Share of participations in signed grant agreements per type of organisation: H2020 vs FP7 Share of EU financial contribution in signed grant agreements per type of organisation: H2020 vs FP7

14 How did SMEs fare in terms of grant agreements? Share of SMEs participations in signed grant agreements: H2020 vs FP7 Share of EU financial contribution to SMEs in signed grant agreements: H2020 vs FP7

15 Country breakdown for the SME instrument? Applications to the Horizon 2020 SME instrument per EU Member State

16 Country s success rate under the SME instrument Success rate in applications to the Horizon 2020 SME instrument per EU MS

17 No. topics Budget Mill. EUR Call 2014 SC5 SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014 Proposte presentate Proposte finanziate Tasso di successo % Partecipazione Coordinamento No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate 313 (47) No. Proposte presentate a coordiname nto italiano 22 (10) No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati 64 (12) No. Coordiname nti italiani finanziati 4 (1) Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani 20,4% (18.7%) Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani 18,2% (10%) Contributo finanziario per l Italia 17,895,389 (9,366,197 ) (x ) Dati parziali 2015 Call 1 stage

18 Call 2014 SC5 SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014 Success Rate

19 Call 2014 SC5 SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014 Numero Partecipazioni Beneficiari Finanziati Beneficiari Proposte

20 Call 2014 SC5 SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014 Budget Member States (%) Sweden 5% United Kingdom 17% Austria 4% Belgium 5% Bulgaria 0% Croatia 0% Cyprus 0% Czech Republic 0% Denmark 2% Estonia 0% Finland 2% France 8% Spain 12% Germany 17% Slovakia 0% Slovenia 1% Romania 1% Portugal 3% Poland 1% Netherlands 13% Malta 0% Italy 6% Luxembourg 0% Latvia 0% Lithuania 0% Greece 2% Hungary 0% Ireland 0% 22

21 Call 2014 SC5 SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls Budget Member States ( )

22 Call 2014 SC5 EU funding rate vs. population rate per EU Member State Percentage of population Percentage of financial contrib. 24

23 Common aspects of a NON-successful proposals 1/2 POOR: EXCELLENCE - IMPACT - IMPLEMENTATION Not clear objectives output and quantification of impacts Poor stakeholder involvement: Two-ways interaction/involvement of end-users Interaction at beginning/interim/final product Poor integration of work among different institutions Poor plan of exploitation, transferability and sustainability of the activities Not sound/credible mechanism for monitoring performances

24 Common aspects of a NON-successful proposals 2/2 Low technology readiness level for IA Not faire/adequate sub-division of resources Non-adequate number and involvement of partners and credible management structure Non-adequate number of tasks / deliverables and limited number milestones For stage-1, poorly focused on the idea and credible approach rather than WP structure or management

25 Expert Distribution in H2020 Expert'%'in'SC5.H2020' Call for experts