ADMINISTRATION & BENEFITS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ADMINISTRATION & BENEFITS"

Transcription

1 OVERVIEW OF THE KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION & BENEFITS Background Most Kentucky public employees are provided retirement coverage through one of six state administered retirement systems. These systems are defined benefit plans, which provide lifetime retirement benefits for the employee based upon a formula established by state statute that does not vary with the level of contributions, investment performance, and other relevant factors. This differs from a defined contribution plan, like a 401(k), where the retirement benefits the employee will receive is based upon the account balance accumulated at retirement and does vary based upon the contributions, investment performance, the employee s life span, and other relevant factors. These state-administered retirement systems, along with Social Security benefits (if applicable), and other sources of retirement income (such as other retirement accounts and post-retirement employment) serve as the basis for providing income to Kentucky public employees during their retirement years. Note: Teachers participating in the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System and some local government employees do not participate in Social Security. State employees, teachers, as well as many local government employees, are eligible to participate in voluntary defined contribution plans offered by the state through the Kentucky Public Employees Deferred Compensation Authority, which includes a 401(k) plan and a 457 plan. What Is Kentucky Retirement System (KRS)? State employees and many local government employees generally participate in one of the three following retirement systems: Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS). This system was established July 1, 1956 and its membership includes employees of state government, non-teaching staff at regional state supported universities (i.e. Eastern Kentucky University), and employees of local health departments, regional mental health/mental retardation agencies, and other quasi-state agencies. KERS includes both non-hazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. KERS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute to and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. County Employees Retirement System (CERS). This system was established July 1, 1958 and its membership includes employees of city and county governments, police and firefighters, non-teaching staff of local boards of education, circuit clerks, local library employees, and other local government agency employees. CERS includes both nonhazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. CERS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute to and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. State Police Retirement System (SPRS). This system was established July 1, 1958 and its membership includes all uniformed state police officers. SPRS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute to and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. These three systems are administered under one administrative agency known as the Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS). In addition to administering pension benefits, KRS is also responsible for the administration of retiree health benefits for members of these systems as well as disability and death benefits. Note: The other state-administered pension plans include the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System (KTRS), the Judicial Retirement Plan (JRP), and the Legislators Retirement Plan (LRP). JRP and LRP are administered under one administrative agency known as the Judicial Form Retirement System (JFRS). These systems also administer retiree health benefits and disability/death benefits for their members. Who Administers KRS? As provided by statute, a nine-member board of trustees oversees the administration of KRS with five trustees being elected by the membership, three being appointed by the Governor, and one being the Secretary of the Personnel Cabinet. The five elected trustees are comprised of two trustees elected by the KERS membership, two elected by the CERS membership, and one elected by the SPRS membership. Of the three members appointed by the Governor, two must have at least 10 years of investment experience as defined by statute and one must be knowledgeable about the 1

2 impact of pensions on local governments. Elected and appointed trustees serve for four-year terms and may serve no more than three consecutive terms 1. The board annually elects a chair and vice-chair and the chair appoints members to various committees of the board including the investment committee, retiree health plan committee, disability appeals/administrative appeals committee, legislative & budget committee, human resources committee, and the audit committee. The current composition of the board is provided below. The board appoints an Executive Director to oversee day to day operations and to staff the needs of the systems. The current interim Executive Director is Bill Thielen and as of June 30, 2011, KRS consisted of 248 employees 2. Current KRS Board of Trustees Thomas Elliott, Chair Governor Appointee Tim Longmeyer Secretary of the Personnel Cabinet Vince Lang CERS elected trustee Dr. Daniel Bauer, Vice-Chair Governor Appointee Bobby Henson KERS elected trustee Vacant 3 CERS elected trustee Jennifer Elliott Governor Appointee Susan Smith KERS elected trustee Randy Overstreet SPRS elected trustee Who Participates in KRS? As of June 30, 2011, 379 agencies participated in KERS and 1,402 agencies participated in CERS 4. For both KERS and CERS, state statute defines the types of agencies that are eligible for participation with final approval in the process being granted or denied by the KRS board. In the case of KERS, an Executive Order declaring the agency eligible for participation is required while CERS agencies must meet statutory definitions in order to participate (the board determines if the agency meets the definition). Once an agency begins participating, all regular full-time employees hired after the agency s participation date are required to contribute to the systems. For KERS and CERS, regular full-time means an employee who average 100 hours of work per month over a calendar or fiscal year, except that school board employees are required to average 80 hours per month over the months represented by the days worked 5. All regular full-time state police officers participate in SPRS. The number of employees (often referred to as active members), former employees with accounts but not retired (often referred to as inactive members), and retired members by system is provided in the table below. System # of Active Members # of Inactive Members Retired Members Total KERS Non-Hazardous 46,617 38,597 38, ,811 KERS Hazardous 4,291 3,264 3,064 10,619 CERS Non-Hazardous 85,285 65,914 43, ,410 CERS Hazardous 9,407 2,774 6,468 18,649 SPRS ,263 2,585 Total 146, ,906 92, ,074 Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems Actuarial Valuation, June 30, 2011 Employees earn service credit for months and days worked in a regular full-time position. With the exception of school board employees, all employees earn one month of service credit in the systems for every month worked in a regular full-time position. School board employees working in a regular full-time position earn service credit based upon their days worked, with 180 days worked in a regular full-time position equaling 12 months of service credit (less service credit is given for days worked less than 180). 1 Legislative changes in 2008 and 2012 set a 3-term limit. Current trustees serving a term in excess of the updated term limits are allowed to complete their current term of office. 2 Source: Board material for the August 2011 board meeting. 3 Robert Wilcher resigned his position as CERS trustee in May Per KRS (5), the KRS board will determine by a majority vote of the remaining trustees who will replace Mr. Wilcher for the remainder of his term. 4 Source: June 30, 2011 Kentucky Retirement Systems Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 5 Certain exceptions apply to the regular full-time requirement such as seasonal, temporary, and interim positions that are not subject to the participation requirements. However, statute limits the duration and frequency of use of these positions by agencies. 2

3 Within KERS and CERS, there are both non-hazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. In order for a job to be classified as hazardous duty, it must meet the requirements established by state law, the employing agency must request hazardous duty coverage for the position and agree to pay the higher employer contribution rates, and the KRS Board of Trustees must review and adopt the position as hazardous duty (subject to a statutory definition). In general, hazardous positions in KERS and CERS primarily cover police, fire, EMS, and corrections employees. In 2008, the definition for CERS hazardous duty positions was amended in HB 1 for employees who began participating in the systems on or after 9/1/2008. Retirement Eligibility Employees must meet certain age and/or service credit requirements before they can retire and begin receiving benefits. In KRS, the retirement eligibility requirements vary based upon type of coverage (non-hazardous or hazardous) and the date the employee first began participating in the systems. Two columns are provided in the table below, one showing the requirements to earn an unreduced benefit (no penalties) and one showing the requirements for a reduced benefit (penalties are applied and based upon how many years the employee is short of reaching an unreduced benefit). System Unreduced Benefit Reduced Benefit KERS/CERS Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Non- Any age with at least 27 years of service; or Age 55 with at least 5 years of service; or Hazardous Age 65 with at least 4 years of service Any age with at least 25 years of service KERS & CERS Hazardous, SPRS Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Must meet rule of 87 (age+ service equals this value) and must be at least 57 years of age; or Age 65 with at least 5 years of service Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Any age with at least 20 years of service; or Age 55 with at least 5 years of service Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Age 60 with at least 10 years of service Note: Reduction determined by actuary, 4.5% to 6.5% for each year short of unreduced benefit. Age 50 with at least 15 years of service Note: Reduction determined by actuary, 6.5% for each year short of unreduced benefit. Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Any age with at least 25 years of service; or Age 60 with at least 5 years of service Note: Employees can also purchase different types of service credit (i.e. military service, federal service) and can use the purchased service to meet the service requirements for retirement eligibility listed above. In addition, employees of KERS/SPRS agencies and many CERS agencies receive additional service credit for accumulated sick leave at retirement which can also be used to meet the service requirements for retirement eligibility listed above. However, the ability to use purchased service and sick leave service credit for retirement eligibility has been limited for new participants over time. New participants on or after 8/1/04 cannot use most service purchases towards meeting retirement eligibility requirements, and new participants on or after 9/1/08 are further restricted. In addition, sick leave service credit for new participants on or after 9/1/08 cannot be used for determining retirement eligibility. What Are the Benefits of Each Plan? Each system is designed to provide three types of benefits: a monthly retirement benefit for life based on the employee's salary and service (the pension benefit), health insurance benefits after retirement, and disability/death benefits. Information on each of these benefits is provided below and on the following pages. Monthly Retirement Benefit: Since these plans are defined benefits plans, benefits are paid based on a formula established by statute which is as follows: Final Compensation X Benefit Factor X Years of Service Credit = Annual Benefit The average salary used for determining benefits at the time of retirement. Usually the average of the highest 3 or highest 5 years of salary. A percentage based upon the retirement plan, the type of service, and the timing of the member s service. Service earned for employment, purchased service credit, and service credit awarded for accumulated sick leave at retirement provided the agency participates in a sick leave program. 3

4 Formula for Non-Hazardous Employees 6 FINAL COMPENSATION BENEFIT FACTOR SERVICE CREDIT Participating before 9/1/08: Avg. of Participating before 9/1/08: KERS & CERS Participating on & after 9/1/08: Includes: highest 5 years of salary, must KERS: Years of Service Factor Service earned contain at least 48 months of service, 1.97%;or 10 or less 1.10% for time worked includes lump-sum payments for 2.00% for employees with 13 Greater than 10, but no more than % in a regular fulltime position compensatory time. months service between Greater than 20, but no more than % Participating on & after 9/1/08: Avg. 1/1/98-1/1/99. Greater than 26, but no more than % Purchased of the 5 complete fiscal years CERS: Additional years above % service immediately preceding retirement, 2.2% if participating before Service credit for must contain 60 months of service (all 5 years must contain 12 months service), does not include lump-sum payments for compensatory time. 8/1/04, 2.0% if participating on or after 8/1/04 but before 9/1/08. accumulated sick leave at retirement. Formula for Hazardous Employees FINAL COMPENSATION BENEFIT FACTOR SERVICE CREDIT Participating before 9/1/08: Avg. of Participating before 9/1/08: KERS & CERS Participating on & after 9/1/08: Same as highest 3 years of salary, min. of 24 KERS: 2.49% Years of Service Factor KERS/CERS Nonhazardous. months, includes lump-sum CERS & SPRS: 2.50% 10 or less 1.30% payments for compensatory time. Greater than 10, but no more than % Participating on & after 9/1/08: Avg. Greater than 20, but less than % of the highest 3 complete fiscal years, must contain 36 months (all 3 years must contain 12 months service), does not include lump-sum payments for compensatory time. 25 or more 2.50% Note: In KERS and SPRS, all accumulated sick leave is converted to additional months of service credit. For CERS, the agency may adopt the standard or alternate sick leave program and must choose the amount of sick leave that can be converted. For new employees who begin participating in the systems on or after 9/1/08, the maximum amount of sick leave that can be converted to additional service credit is limited to 12 months. The annual benefit shown in the calculations above is paid monthly to the retiree. At retirement, a retiree may choose to take a reduced monthly benefit in order to provide a monthly benefit to a beneficiary upon their death, either for a period certain or for the life of the beneficiary. The systems administered by KRS also provide for a statutory 1.5% annual increase to these monthly benefits after retirement, often referred to as the cost of living adjustment (COLA). The COLA that would have been awarded on July 1, 2012 and July 1, 2013 will be suspended under the current provisions of the biennial budget. Note: An easy way to view the benefit structure is to look at the benefit factor as an income replacement rate. For example, the CERS non-hazardous benefit factor for many CERS employees is 2.0%. This means the formula provides 2.0% of a retiring employee's average salary for each year of service. If the employee has 30 years of service, the benefit would provide 60% of the retiring employee's average salary. Health Insurance Benefits After Retirement: The systems also provide access to group rates on medical insurance for retired members, their spouse, and dependents. Coverage for retirees not eligible for Medicare is provided through the Kentucky Employees Health Plan, the same health plan provided to state and school board employees. Coverage for Medicare eligible retirees is provided through a plan administered by or contracted through the retirement systems which then coordinates with Medicare for delivery of health benefits. As provided by state statute, the systems also subsidize medical coverage for the retiree and in some cases for the dependents of the retiree (i.e. if the member retires with hazardous duty service credit). In general, employees participating prior to 7/1/03, receive a percentage of the premium paid based upon service credit, while employees who begin participating after that date receive a set dollar amount for each year of service credit. The table below provides 6 For KERS non-hazardous participants, the retirement windows that provided a high-3 final compensation calculation and a 2.2% benefit factor for employees that met certain age and/or service requirements expired 1/1/09. The high-3 window also applied to CERS non-hazardous members but also expired 1/1/09. 4

5 details the benefits for non-hazardous and hazardous duty members. KERS AND CERS NON-HAZARDOUS For members participating before 07/03: Years of Service % of Premium Paid for retiree Less than 4: 0% % % % 20 or more: 100% For new participants on or after 07/03 but before 09/08: Minimum 10 years of service at retirement for retiree health benefit eligibility. Benefit of 10 per month for each year of service, adjusted by 1.5% annually. For new participants on or after 09/08: Same as before but minimum 15 years of service at retirement for benefit eligibility. KERS & CERS HAZARDOUS, SPRS For members participating before 07/03: Years of Service % of Premium Paid for retiree % of Premium Paid for spouse & dependents (hazardous service only) Less than 4: 0% 0% % 25% % 50% % 75% 20 or more: 100% 100% For new participants on or after 07/03 but before 09/08: Minimum 10 years of service at retirement for retiree health benefit eligibility. Benefit of 15 per month for each year of service, adjusted by 1.5% annually. Spouse: 10 per month for each year of haz. service upon death of member. For new participants on or after 09/08: Same as before but minimum 15 years of service at retirement for benefit eligibility. Note: Since the 2005 plan year, non-hazardous retirees participating in the Kentucky Employees Health Plan have also received a partial subsidy for dependent coverage that has been provided to state and school employees participating in the plan. Almost all service purchases made on or after 8/1/04 do not count towards meeting the service requirements for varying levels of retiree health benefits listed above. Disability and Death Benefits: Like most defined benefit plans, the systems provide benefits for those employees who become disabled or who die prior to retirement. The systems also provide death before retirement and special death in the line of duty benefits. After retirement, the benefits left to the retiree's beneficiary vary based upon the payment option selected at retirement (as previously discussed). In addition, the systems provide a 5,000 lump sum death benefit for members who retire with at least 4 years of service. Disability and death before retirement benefits are described in the table below 7. SYSTEM DISABILITY (NON-OCCUPATIONAL) DEATH BEFORE RETIREMENT KERS Nonhazardous, CERS Nonhazardous KERS Hazardous, CERS Hazardous, SPRS Minimum 5 years service to apply for benefits and approval determined by systems under criteria established by state statute. Benefit Calculation Employees participating before 8/1/04: Service used to calculate benefits is doubled but cannot exceed 25 years of service or age 65 (when additional service is added to their current age). Exception: employees with 25 years of service have their service increased to 27 years. Employees participating on or after 8/1/04: Higher of benefit calculated using actual service or 20% of member's final pay. Minimum 5 years service to apply for benefits and approval determined by systems under criteria established by state statute. Benefit Calculation Employees participating before 8/1/04: Service used to calculate benefits is doubled but cannot exceed 20 years of service or age 55 (when additional service is added to their current age). Employees participating on or after 8/1/04: Higher of benefit calculated using actual service or 25% of member's final pay. The employee s beneficiary is eligible for benefits if at the time of death the: Employee was eligible to retire Employee was less than age 55, was working at the time of death, and had at least 5 years of service Employee was less than age 55, was not working at the time of death, and had at least 12 years of service. Benefit calculated using formula and actual service earned at the time of death. Penalties apply if the member was not eligible for an unreduced benefit at the time of death. Same as above 7 Note: Employees participating in all state administered retirement systems are eligible for special benefits if they are disabled or killed in the line of duty benefits (not described in this document). 5

6 Reemployment After Retirement State statute places restrictions on KERS, CERS, and SPRS retirees returning to work after retirement with a participating employer of the systems. As a result of HB 1, the following restrictions/requirements are applicable to employees of these systems who retire and return to work on or after 9/1/2008: Required Break in Employment: The employee must have a 3 month break in employment before returning to any position with an employer participating in the systems, except that hazardous KERS or CERS and SPRS retirees who return to work in a full-time hazardous duty position are only required to observe a 1 month break. If the break is not observed, the employee s retirement is voided and all benefit payments issued in error shall be repaid to the systems. Both the employee and employer must certify that no pre-arranged agreement for the employee to return to work existed prior to the employee s retirement. How It works for the employee: Provided the break is observed, the employee can return to work, draw their pension, but will not contribute to the systems or earn a second pension. How it works for the employer: If the employee has returned to work in a position that would have qualified for participation in the systems, the employer is required to pay contributions to the systems and to reimburse the systems for the cost of health insurance premiums paid by the systems for the retiree (not to exceed the cost of the single premium). If the employee takes health coverage through the employer and waives coverage with the systems, then no reimbursement is required. Note: Prior to the passage of HB 1, retirees of this system could return to work and earn a second account. Required breaks in employment varied based upon position and system. In addition, employers were not required to reimburse the systems for retiree health costs prior to the bill s passage. Reciprocity Members who have service in more than one retirement plan administered by the Commonwealth of Kentucky can combine service in the plans to determine eligibility for retirement and final compensation (years of highest salary). Each system will pay a benefit based on the amount of service in that system. Example: John was employed with a local board of education in a classified position and accumulated 10 years of service in CERS. He is now employed with the same board of education as a teacher and has accumulated 17 years of service in KTRS. John would be eligible to retire at any age with no reductions in his retirement benefits because he has accumulated a combined total of 27 years of service. His salary, which was higher during his tenure as a teacher, would be used to calculate his final compensation in CERS. John would receive a retirement check from CERS based upon his 10 years of service and a separate retirement check from KTRS based on his 17 years of service. Taxation of benefits Federal Income Tax: Monthly benefits from all systems are subject to federal income tax. If a member made contributions with after-tax dollars (usually service purchases), then a portion of the monthly benefit at retirement will not be subject to federal income tax. State Income Tax: All benefits attributable to service earned on or before December 31, 1997, are exempt from Kentucky income tax. The portion of the member s benefits earned January 1, 1998 and after is subject to Kentucky income tax. However, an annual pension exclusion of 41,110 applies to this portion and other retirement income sources. FUNDING & INVESTMENTS How are Benefits Funded? As with any retirement plan, funding for system benefits and expenses are provided through three sources: employee contributions, employer contributions, and return on investment (see graphic representation on the following page). Employee contributions are set by state statute and do not vary. The employer contribution rate varies annually as determined by the actuarial valuation. Employee and employer contribution rates are provided on pages 9 to 11. 6

7 PENSION FUND employer contributions investments employee contributions Assets expenses benefits Measuring the Financial Health of the Plans and Determining Employer Contributions The retirement systems are required by statute to conduct an annual actuarial valuation of the plans. The purpose of the valuation, which is completed by an actuary hired by the systems, is to determine: The amount of benefits to be paid out into the future. The benefits, or future liabilities, of the plans are prescribed by law and regulation and in some cases, the board of trustees. In order to calculate the amount of benefits that will be paid out in the future, the actuary must make assumptions about things that affect the plan s money (the rate of return on investments, salary growth of employees, retiree medical inflation rates, etc.) and it s people (when will people retire, how long will they live after retirement, etc.). Once these liabilities are determined, they are discounted to today s dollars and separated, using an actuarial cost method (the systems uses the entry age normal cost method) into two components: the actuarially accrued liability (liability dedicated to service already earned by employees and retirees) and the present value of future normal cost (liability dedicated to future service of employees based upon assumptions). Note: Some key assumptions in developing the liability values include the investment return assumption, payroll growth assumption, and future medical inflation. For KRS, the investment return assumption is 7.75% per annum for all pension and insurance funds except for the KERS non-hazardous and SPRS insurance funds where the assumption is 4.5% per annum. The payroll growth assumption is 4.5% annually. The medical inflation assumptions are that premiums in the state health plan and the system s Medicare eligible plans are anticipated to increase by 10.5% and 8.5% respectively in FY 2012 trending down annually until achieving a long-term annual increase of 5% in FY 2019 and beyond. 7

8 The financial health of the plan. In the valuation, the Actuarial Value ofassets actuary reports several actuarial statistics useful in -Actuarially Accrued Liability evaluating the financial health of the plans as of valuation date. The two most common actuarial statistics are: the = Unfunded Liabilities Unfunded Liability and the Funding level. The Unfunded Liability is the dollar amount of the actuarially accrued Actuarial Value of Assets liabilities (liabilities for service already earned) that are not Actuarially Accrued Liability covered by the actuarial value of assets. For example, the = Funding Level KERS non-hazardous pension fund had an actuarially accrued liability billion as of June 30, 2011 and actuarial assets of billion, leaving an unfunded liability of billion. The actuarially accrued liability, and in turn the unfunded liabilities, are influenced by a variety of factors investment returns, retirement rates, medical inflation rates, and contributions paid by employers. The funding level is the percent of actuarial assets to actuarially accrued liability. For example, the KERS non-hazardous pension fund had a funding level of 33.3% as of June 30, Another way to state this statistic is for every 1 in liabilities or benefits earned to date, the KERS non-hazardous pension fund held 33 cents in assets. Page 15 provides actuarial and other statistics for each of the systems as well as other data, and page 16 provides historical data on the financial health of the plans. Note: The actuarial value of assets is a smoothed market value that phases in investment gains or losses for a particular year over a 5 year period. The level of employer contributions: The employer contribution for each of the systems includes two contributions-- one for pensions and one for retiree health benefits. Each of these individual contributions is comprised of two components: a payment for normal cost (the estimated cost of the upcoming year of service for active employees) and a payment to finance the unfunded liability over a specific time period (usually 30 years). Unfunded liabilities arise when the plan fails to meet established assumptions. For example, any returns above or below the assumed 7.75% rate of return for the pension funds will increase or decrease unfunded liabilities. As the unfunded liability increases or decreases, so does the cost to employers who bear the risk or reward of when the plan fails to meet the assumption established by the actuary and the board of trustees. Funding Policies that Alter the Employer Contribution For the systems, the level of employer contributions recommended by the actuary have, or are being, adjusted based upon funding policies established by statute and by the board of trustees. KERS/SPRS: Since , the amount provided in the biennial budget for employer contributions to KERS and SPRS has been less than the amount recommended by the KRS board of trustees and its consulting actuary 8. In 2008, the General Assembly established a funding policy in HB 1 to reach the full actuarially required contribution for pension and retiree health for KERS non-hazardous, KERS hazardous, and SPRS by , , and , respectively. The policy requires an increasing percentage of the required contribution to be paid each year until the full actuarially required contribution is paid. For example, 53% of the actuarially required contribution of 44.55% for KERS non-hazardous in fiscal year is 23.61% of payroll (the amounts required by the funding policy are included in the upcoming biennial budget). CERS: Since the late 1980 s, the KRS Board of Trustees has established various funding policies to incrementally 8 HB 1 Funding policy for KERS & SPRS % of the actuarially required contribution paid by year Fiscal KERS Non- KERS SPRS Year Hazardous Hazardous % 76% 60% % 79% 65% % 83% 70% % 86% 75% % 89% 80% % 92% 85% % 95% 90% % 98% 95% % 100% 98% % 100% % % % % % 8 Some rate reductions also occurred during a few years in the 1990s but were relatively minor in relation to the current rate reductions.

9 increase the employer contribution to fund retiree health benefits for all systems it administers, including CERS. In 2006, the board adopted a policy to phase-in to the full actuarially required employer contribution for retiree health benefits over a 5-year period (using fiscal year as a base rate and increasing the rate over the 5-year period from FY through FY ). In 2009, the General Assembly passed HB 117 requiring a 10-year phase-in period using the same start date and extending the phase-in period through FY Employee and Employer Contribution Rates Employee contribution rates are set by statute as a percentage of the employee s salary and do not vary. Employee contribution rates are provided in the table below. EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION RATE (% OF PAYROLL) Participating Prior to 9/1/08 Participating on or after 9/1/08 KERS/CERS Non-Hazardous KERS/CERS Hazardous & SPRS KERS/CERS Non-Hazardous KERS/CERS Hazardous & SPRS Pension 5% 8% 5% 8% Insurance 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 5% 8% 6% 9% Note: Changed for new participants via HB 1 in Employer contributions do vary as plan experience, benefits, and assumptions change. The employer contribution rate over different points in time, including more recent employer contribution rates is provided on the chart below and on the charts on the following pages. These charts show the board 9 recommended pension and retiree health contribution (and the combined total) for employers in each system and the amount actually budgeted by the General Assembly (if applicable). 5 Historical KERS Non-Hazardous Employer Rates as a % of Payroll Insurance 0.21% 0.48% 1.77% 3.15% 5.89% 6.45% 12.06% 12.33% 16.81% 16.41% Pension 7.04% 6.97% 5.88% 5.74% 10.68% 16.54% 18.96% 21.77% 24.30% Total 7.25% 7.45% 7.65% 8.89% 5.89% 17.13% 28.60% 31.29% 38.58% 40.71% Budgeted 7.25% 7.45% 7.65% 8.89% 5.89% 7.75% 10.01% 11.61% 16.98% 19.82% Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates 9 For FY and 09-10, the board recommended rate differs from the rate reported in the actuarial valuation (i.e., the actuarially recommended rate- ARC) for KERS non-hazardous and SPRS due to the investment return assumption used in the actuarial valuation versus the investment return assumption used by the board to determine the employer contribution rate. For CERS, the insurance fund contribution rate and thereby the total contribution rate adopted by the board differs from the valuation rate in FY through the current fiscal year in the charts due to the funding policies established by the board regarding a phase-in of the insurance contribution, and HB 117 passed during the 2009 regular session that extended this phase-in period. 9

10 Historical KERS Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll Insurance 0.34% 1.09% 6.17% 7.46% 12.66% 14.04% 23.94% 23.56% 20.26% 19.73% Pension 16.91% 12.91% 8.88% 10.41% 6.18% 9.28% 10.84% 11.98% 14.11% 14.11% Total 17.25% 14.00% 15.05% 17.87% 18.84% 23.32% 34.78% 35.54% 34.37% 33.84% Budgeted 17.25% 14.00% 15.05% 17.87% 18.84% 22.00% 24.35% 24.69% 26.12% 28.98% Historical CERS Non-Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll Insurance 0.15% 0.31% 1.38% 2.36% 6.14% 7.22% 5.74% 7.54% 6.90% 7.26% Pension 7.10% 4.94% 6.57% 6.29% 0.27% 5.97% 7.76% 8.62% 10.03% 11.70% Total 7.25% 5.25% 7.95% 8.65% 6.41% 13.19% 13.50% 16.16% 16.93% 18.96% Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates Note: The employer contribution rates for CERS non-hazardous and hazardous were reduced in HB 1 during the 2008 special session from the amount recommended by the KRS board. 10

11 Historical CERS Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll Insurance 0.13% 0.99% 5.11% 6.33% 13.22% 15.10% 14.46% 16.86% 16.46% 17.85% Pension 15.87% 13.01% 10.99% 12.36% 3.06% 13.11% 15.04% 16.11% 16.79% 17.91% Total 16.00% 14.00% 16.10% 18.69% 16.28% 28.21% 29.50% 32.97% 33.25% 35.76% Note: The employer contribution rates for CERS non-hazardous and hazardous were reduced in HB 1 during the 2008 special session from the amount recommended by the KRS board Historical SPRS Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll Insurance 0.12% 1.41% 9.48% 14.21% 21.58% 21.66% 27.75% 26.64% 49.89% 54.83% Pension 18.38% 16.84% 10.09% 12.37% 20.64% 32.39% 35.23% 35.74% 39.80% Total 18.50% 18.25% 19.57% 26.58% 21.58% 42.30% 60.14% 61.87% 85.63% 94.63% Budgeted 18.50% 18.25% 19.57% 26.58% 21.58% 25.50% 30.07% 33.08% 45.54% 52.13% Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates 11

12 Projected Employer Contribution Rates KRS has also provided projections on the employer contributions rates over the next 20 years (as of the June 30, 2011 actuarial valuation). The projections show the rates under the HB 1 phase-in for KERS and SPRS and the insurance phase-in for CERS, assumes all future assumptions are met, and also includes an annual 1.5% COLA each year (the projections do not reflect the COLA suspension for the upcoming biennium provided by this budget). The projections for selected future years are shown in the tables below. Fiscal Year KERS Non-Hazardous KERS Hazardous SPRS Pension Health Total Pension Health Total Pension Health Total % 8.23% 19.82% 12.33% 16.65% 28.98% 26.55% 25.58% 52.13% % 8.75% 23.61% 13.41% 16.38% 29.79% 33.24% 30.43% 63.67% % 9.50% 26.79% 14.89% 17.32% 32.21% 39.50% 31.65% 71.15% % 10.93% 32.40% 15.92% 17.81% 33.73% 49.10% 31.29% 80.39% % 10.97% 44.32% 18.26% 16.97% 35.23% 71.22% 30.95% % % 10.62% 54.73% 20.03% 14.30% 34.33% 85.05% 30.71% % % 10.54% 58.36% 22.79% 12.96% 35.75% % 31.04% % Fiscal Year CERS Non-Hazardous CERS Hazardous Pension Health Total Pension Health Total % 7.26% 18.96% 17.91% 17.85% 35.76% % 6.93% 19.55% 20.10% 17.50% 37.60% % 7.38% 20.77% 21.78% 18.70% 40.48% % 8.30% 21.80% 22.50% 21.09% 43.59% % 7.83% 22.01% 25.18% 21.31% 46.49% % 7.36% 22.97% 29.56% % % 7.15% 24.97% 35.57% 19.63% 55.20% Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, Twenty-Year Rate Projections with Ad-Hoc COLAs. Prepared by Cavanaugh MacDonald Consulting Inc. Sources of Deterioration of Funding Levels/Growth in Unfunded Liabilities A good deal of debate exists over the factors responsible for the deterioration in the system s funding levels and the growth in unfunded liabilities in recent years. In 2011, the systems actuary evaluated the different factors that have led to the growth in higher unfunded liabilities from the June 30, 2005 actuarial valuation to the June 30, 2011 actuarial valuation for the systems respective pension funds. These factors include investment returns less than assumed, cost of living adjustments (which are not pre-funded), benefit increases, assumption changes, employer rate reductions for KERS and SPRS, demographic and salary experience, and other factors (negative amortization of UAL, data corrections, software changes). The charts on the following pages detail these factors for each system. 12

13 Dem. & Salary 371 Employer Rate Reductions 948 KERS Non-Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 1,345 Investment 1,018 Assump. Changes 690 COLAs 995 Benefits 88 Dem. & Salary 30 Employer Rate Reductions 12 Assump. Changes 28 KERS Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other (18) Benefits (1) Investment 65 COLAs 61 For the KERS non-hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 2 billion to billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 60% to 33.3%. For the KERS hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 34 million to 211 million during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 84.1% to 70.8%. Other 692 Dem. & Salary 261 CERS Non-Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Investment 1,053 Dem. & Salary 61 Assump. Changes 79 Benefits 25 CERS Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 26 Investment 331 Assump. Changes 357 Benefits 72 COLAs 528 COLAs 214 For the CERS non-hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 326 million to billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 83.6% to 63.1%. For the CERS hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 343 million to billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 75% to 62.2%. Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, UAL Attribution. Prepared by Cavanaugh MacDonald Consulting Inc. 13

14 Dem. & Salary 34 Employer Rate Reductions 40 SPRS Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 111 Investment 53 Assump. Changes (38) COLAs 64 Benefits (19) For the SPRS pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 105 million to 349 million during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 77.1% to 45%. Investments & Investment Performance Kentucky Retirement Systems invests system assets in separate pension and retiree health funds. Asset allocations and fund performance over time are provided in the tables below. Data is as of April Pension Funds Asset Allocation InsuranceFunds Asset Allocation Real Return, 10% Absolute Return, 10% Real Estate, 2% Private Equity, 11% Global Fixed Income, 5% Currency Overlay, 0% High Yield, 5% Cash, 3% 1 yr. 3 yr. 5 yr. 10 yr. 1 yr. 3 yr. 5 yr. 10 yr. Total Fund 0.09% 13.46% 2.18% 5.84% Total Fund -2.93% 14.69% 0.46% 5.54% Benchmark 0.18% 13.49% 2.72% 5.91% Benchmark -0.92% 16.04% 0.95% 5.45% Assumed rate of return for pension funds is 7.75%. U.S. Equity, 20% Equitization, 0% Int. Equity, 19% Emerging Markets, 4% Core Fixed Income, 10% Currency Overlay, - 0.1% Real Return, 11.3% Absolute Return, 8.1% Real Estate, 1.0% Private Equity, 6.2% Global Fixed Income, 4.5% Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, April 2012 Investment Performance Update High Yield, 4.6% Cash, 9.2% Core Fixed Income, 10.7% U.S. Equity, 22.9% Equitization, 0.0% Int. Equity, 18.4% Emerging Markets, 3.2% Assumed rate of return for insurance funds is 4.5% for KERS nonhazardous and SPRS; 7.75% for KERS hazardous and CERS. 14

15 KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS FINANCIAL & STATISTICAL DATA (JUNE 30, 2011) KERS KERS CERS CERS Statistical Item Non-Haz. Haz. Non-Haz. Haz. SPRS Total Pension Fund Actuarial Statistics A. Actuarial Liability (in billions) B. Actuarial Value of Assets (in billions) C. Unfunded Liability (diff. between A & B) (7.455) (0.211) (3.288) (1.079) (0.349) (12.382) D. Funding Level (% ratio of B. to A) 33.3% 70.8% 63.1% 62.2% 45.0% 49.1% Insurance Fund Actuarial Statistics A. Actuarial Liability (in billions) B. Actuarial Value of Assets (in billions) C. Unfunded Liability (diff. between A & B) (3.828) (0.177) (1.641) (0.877) (0.315) (6.838) D. Funding Level (% ratio of B. to A) 10.6% 65.1% 46.6% 46.8% 28.2% 31.3% Membership Data # of Employees 46,617 4,291 85,285 9, ,565 # of Inactive Members (Not retired or working) 38,597 3,264 65,914 2, ,906 # of Retired Members & Beneficiaries 38,597 3,064 43,211 6,468 1,263 92,603 Total 123,811 10, ,410 18,649 2, ,074 Employed Member Payroll Data Total Payroll (in billions) Employee Contributions (in millions) Employer Contributions (in millions) Average Salary Reported for Retirement 37,146 31,008 26,694 48,792 50,459 31,781 Retired Member Payroll Data Total Pension Payouts (billions) Total Retiree Health Payouts (billions) Total Payouts (billions) Average Annual Pension Benefit 20,436 13,994 10,871 24,675 36,839 N/A Market Value of Assets Total Pension Net Plan Assets (billions) Total Retiree Health Net Plan Assets (billions) Total Net Plan Assets (billions) Source: June 30, 2011 Actuarial Valuation; June 30, 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Note: Actuarial Statistics, Membership data, Total Payroll, and Average Salary Reported for Retirement are taken from the Actuarial Valuation. All other data is taken from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Employee and employer contributions include all contributions to the pension and insurance funds. Pension and insurance payouts include all deductions to the funds such as benefit payments, refunds, and administrative costs. 15

16 140.0% Pension Funds Funding Level (%): 10 Year History 70.0% Insurance Funds Funding Level (%): 10 Year History 120.0% 60.0% 100.0% 50.0% 80.0% 40.0% 60.0% 30.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% KERS NH 110.4% 97.4% 85.1% 73.6% 60.0% 56.9% 52.5% 45.0% 38.3% 33.3% KERS H 116.9% 108.1% 98.4% 92.3% 84.1% 83.6% 81.3% 74.5% 73.1% 70.8% CERS NH 129.6% 119.7% 105.1% 94.0% 83.6% 82.1% 78.5% 71.4% 65.6% 63.1% CERS H 111.9% 97.8% 88.8% 80.9% 75.0% 74.2% 72.9% 67.9% 65.5% 62.2% SPRS 115.3% 99.6% 88.0% 77.1% 66.6% 63.7% 59.8% 54.8% 49.7% 45.0% Pension Funds Unfunded Liability (in billions of dollars) KERS NH KERS H CERS NH CERS H SPRS % KERS NH 27.3% 26.5% 25.7% 22.7% 7.8% 11.9% 11.1% 11.9% 10.6% 10.6% KERS H 57.4% 53.5% 52.3% 48.6% 34.3% 49.8% 53.2% 61.4% 63.7% 65.1% CERS NH 22.8% 23.9% 24.0% 23.8% 16.9% 28.8% 32.6% 39.6% 40.9% 46.6% CERS H 30.0% 28.8% 30.3% 28.0% 21.9% 31.2% 34.7% 40.9% 41.4% 46.8% SPRS 52.5% 49.2% 48.9% 42.8% 18.1% 26.6% 27.9% 33.9% 27.9% 28.2% Insurance Funds Unfunded Liability(in billions of dollars) KERS NH KERS H CERS NH CERS H SPRS

Tier. Plan. for members participating prior to September 1, 2008

Tier. Plan. for members participating prior to September 1, 2008 Tier Plan for members participating prior to September 1, 2008 This guide is a companion publication to KRS Summary Plan Description. For a comprehensive overview of our plans, refer to the Summary Plan

More information

61.702 Group hospital and medical insurance and managed care plan coverage -- Employee and employer contributions -- Minimum service requirements.

61.702 Group hospital and medical insurance and managed care plan coverage -- Employee and employer contributions -- Minimum service requirements. 61.702 Group hospital and medical insurance and managed care plan coverage -- Employee and employer contributions -- Minimum service requirements. (1) (a) 1. The board of trustees of Kentucky Retirement

More information

age sixty-five (65) or at least sixty (60) months of service if under age sixty-five

age sixty-five (65) or at least sixty (60) months of service if under age sixty-five 61.552 Service credit regained or obtained -- Purchase of current service and service credit -- Interest paid -- Delayed contribution -- Installment payments. (1) Any employee participating in one (1)

More information

West Virginia Department of Public Safety Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (Plan A)

West Virginia Department of Public Safety Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (Plan A) West Virginia Department of Public Safety Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (Plan A) Actuarial Valuation As of July 1, 2013 Prepared by: for the West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board January

More information

Summary Plan Description for Active Membership

Summary Plan Description for Active Membership Summary Plan Description for Active Membership Ta b l e o f C o n t e n t s Chapter One: KRS Over view... 3 Plan Administration... 3 Your KRS Board O f Trustees... 3 IRS Regulations Per taining to KRS...

More information

COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011

COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011 COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011 GOLDSTEIN & ASSOCIATES Actuaries and Consultants 29 SOUTH LaSALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PHONE

More information

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015 K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Q-1 Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Retirement Plans and History Retirement Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015 Q-1 Kansas

More information

ISSUE REVIEW Fiscal Services Division

ISSUE REVIEW Fiscal Services Division ISSUE REVIEW Fiscal Services Division December 6, 2013 Overview of Iowa Public Pension Systems ISSUE This Issue Review provides basic comparative information between the three public pension systems for

More information

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program Prepared as of June 30, 2013 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 19,

More information

Choosing Your Retirement Plan Optional Retirement Plan for Higher Education VRS Hybrid Retirement Plan Membership Date: On or after January 1, 2014

Choosing Your Retirement Plan Optional Retirement Plan for Higher Education VRS Hybrid Retirement Plan Membership Date: On or after January 1, 2014 Choosing Your Retirement Plan Optional Retirement Plan for Higher Education VRS Hybrid Retirement Plan Membership Date: On or after January 1, 2014 A comparison guide to help you select the best plan for

More information

What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF

What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF August 18, 2015 Louis W. Kosiba, Executive Director Mark Nannini, Chief Financial Officer 1 Background Agenda Benefit Structure Retirement

More information

Kentucky Retirement Systems Health Benefits. Mike Burnside, Executive Director National Conference of State Legislators July 28, 2010

Kentucky Retirement Systems Health Benefits. Mike Burnside, Executive Director National Conference of State Legislators July 28, 2010 Kentucky Retirement Systems Health Benefits Mike Burnside, Executive Director National Conference of State Legislators July 28, 2010 Kentucky Retirement Systems Kentucky Retiree Health Plan Statutory changes

More information

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Group Life Insurance Program

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Group Life Insurance Program Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Group Life Insurance Program Prepared as of June 30, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 19,

More information

Historic Legislation Passes that Provides a Shared Responsibility Solution for Long-term Funding of Retiree Health Care

Historic Legislation Passes that Provides a Shared Responsibility Solution for Long-term Funding of Retiree Health Care Historic Legislation Passes that Provides a Shared Responsibility Solution for Long-term Funding of Retiree Health Care Anticipated Retired & Active Member Questions INTRODUCTION The following information

More information

Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati. Pension Report

Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati. Pension Report Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati Pension Report Prepared as of December 31, 2011 and Approved by the Board of Trustees on May

More information

Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force

Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force January 18, 2013 Public Financial Management, Inc. Two Logan Square 18 th & Arch Streets, Suite 1600 Philadelphia, PA 19103-2770 (215)

More information

SUMMARY February 2013 The plans: The impact of the crisis: The impact of pension plan reforms: Total state costs:

SUMMARY February 2013 The plans: The impact of the crisis: The impact of pension plan reforms: Total state costs: SUMMARY February 2013 THE STATE OF OHIO The plans: Ohio has four large state-administered pension systems, two smaller state-administered systems, and some locally-administered systems. The state also

More information

YORK UNIVERSITY PENSION PLAN

YORK UNIVERSITY PENSION PLAN YORK UNIVERSITY PENSION PLAN (Amended and Restated as at January 1, 1992) Unofficial Consolidation to December 31, 2013 This is an unofficial consolidation of the York University Pension Plan including

More information

GEORGIA CODE PROVISIONS PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS INDEX

GEORGIA CODE PROVISIONS PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS INDEX GEORGIA CODE PROVISIONS PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS INDEX TITLE 47. RETIREMENT AND PENSIONS TITLE 47 NOTE CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 2. EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA CHAPTER 3. TEACHERS

More information

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM your retirement benefits Department of State Treasurer Raleigh, NC Revised January 2014 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION

More information

Handbook for Members Virginia Retirement System

Handbook for Members Virginia Retirement System Handbook for Members Virginia Retirement System V R S System Virginia Retirement Handbook for Members Virginia Retirement System The Virginia Retirement System (VRS) exists to provide its members and their

More information

Employees Retirement System (ERS) Old Plan, New Plan, GSEPS Plan Guide E RSGA. Employees Retirement System of Georgia. Serving those who serve Georgia

Employees Retirement System (ERS) Old Plan, New Plan, GSEPS Plan Guide E RSGA. Employees Retirement System of Georgia. Serving those who serve Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) Old Plan, New Plan, GSEPS Plan Guide Serving those who serve Georgia E RSGA Employees Retirement System of Georgia Updated 09/2013 Table of Contents Introduction... 3

More information

South Dakota Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014

South Dakota Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014 South Dakota Retirement System Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014 2014 Xerox Corporation and Buck Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. Xerox and Xerox and Design are trademarks of Xerox Corporation

More information

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS N ew Jersey has six major Stateadministered retirement systems. Along with the required contributions of the public employees, these systems are funded

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED MAY 2015)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED MAY 2015) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED MAY 2015) Q: What is the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP)? DROP is a program that provides employees access to a lump sum

More information

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve April 16, 2015 Mr. James A. Potvin Executive Director Employees Retirement System of Georgia Two Northside 75, Suite

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED AUGUST 2012)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED AUGUST 2012) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED AUGUST 2012) What is the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP)? DROP is a program that provides employees access to a lump sum

More information

Choosing a Retirement Program

Choosing a Retirement Program Revised July 1, 2011 S TATE R ETIREMENT AND P ENSION S YSTEM Choosing a Retirement Program Maryland Optional Retirement Plan Highlights of the SRPS & ORP Retirement Programs ABOUT THIS BOOK About This

More information

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM your retirement benefits Department of State Treasurer Raleigh, NC Revised January 2013 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION

More information

How To Get A Retirement Plan In Wisconsin Retirement System

How To Get A Retirement Plan In Wisconsin Retirement System YOUR BENEFIT HANDBOOK ETF P O Box 7931 Madison, WI 53707-7931 ET-2119 (REV 10/13) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 2 VESTING REQUIREMENTS... 2 WISCONSIN RETIREMENT SYSTEM... 3 Retirement Benefits...

More information

Policy Brief June 2010

Policy Brief June 2010 Policy Brief June 2010 Pension Tension: Understanding Arizona s Public Employee Retirement Plans The Arizona Chamber Foundation (501(c)3) is a non-partisan, objective educational and research foundation.

More information

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2014

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2014 Notes to Basic Financial Statements Note 8 Employees Retirement System Plan Description and Provision The County sponsors the Macomb County Employees Retirement System (the System ), a single employer

More information

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Lansdowne Borough Police Pension Plan Delaware County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Lansdowne Borough Police Pension Plan Delaware County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 COMPLIANCE AUDIT Lansdowne Borough Police Pension Plan Delaware County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 July 2015 The Honorable Mayor and Borough Council Lansdowne Borough

More information

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve Mr. David L. Senn Executive Director Teachers Retirement System State of Montana 1500 Sixth Avenue Helena, MT 59620-0139

More information

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Donora Borough Police Pension Plan Washington County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Donora Borough Police Pension Plan Washington County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 COMPLIANCE AUDIT Donora Borough Police Pension Plan Washington County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 August 2014 The Honorable Mayor and Borough Council Donora Borough

More information

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description 2007

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description 2007 District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description 2007 This booklet is a Summary Plan Description of the benefits provided to you under the District of Columbia Teachers Retirement

More information

VI The Defined Benefit Member (Tiers I and II)

VI The Defined Benefit Member (Tiers I and II) VI The Defined Benefit Member (Tiers I and II) Enrollment Members who first entered the TRS: Before July 1, 1990, are in Tier I; On or after July 1, 1990, are in Tier II. Tier status is established when

More information

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Mount Carmel Township Police Pension Plan Northumberland County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Mount Carmel Township Police Pension Plan Northumberland County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 COMPLIANCE AUDIT Mount Carmel Township Police Pension Plan Northumberland County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 September 2015 Board of Township Supervisors Mount Carmel

More information

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013 Analysis of Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013 Version 1.2 Important Notes Regarding This Report This report is produced to support the Board in its

More information

1999 Academic Pension Plan

1999 Academic Pension Plan 1999 Academic Pension Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Eligibility... 3 Enrolling in the Plan... 3 Contributions... 3 Defined Benefit Component:... 3 Defined Contribution Component:... 4 Other

More information

JUNE 30, 2013 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD

JUNE 30, 2013 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD JUNE 30, 2013 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD September 2013 2013 Smithfield OPEB report - Sept TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Item Page SECTION I OVERVIEW... 1 SECTION II REQUIRED

More information

Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education

Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education Rev. 12/05 Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education Summary Plan Description for the General Employees Pension Plan Police Officer s Pension Plan Firefighter s

More information

NORTH STAR SCHOOL GASB 68 Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2015. The employer s proportionate share associated with TRS

NORTH STAR SCHOOL GASB 68 Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2015. The employer s proportionate share associated with TRS NORTH STAR SCHOOL GASB 68 Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2015 Pension Amounts Total for Employer Employer s proportion of TRS and PERS pension amounts combined 74 The employer

More information

Request to Remain in the CORP. Return to Work after Retirement

Request to Remain in the CORP. Return to Work after Retirement CRECTIONS OFFICER RETIREMENT PLAN 3010 East Camelback Road, Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4416 www.psprs.com Telephone: (602) 255-5575 Fax: (602) 255-5572 9/2012 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Summary Topics Average

More information

TEACHERS RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION A MINNESOTA PUBLIC PENSION FUND

TEACHERS RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION A MINNESOTA PUBLIC PENSION FUND TEACHERS RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION A MINNESOTA PUBLIC PENSION FUND 2011 Welcome! What is TRA? The Teachers Retirement t Association (TRA) is a public retirement t system that was founded in 1931 to provide

More information

Financial Audit Division Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota

Financial Audit Division Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association Financial Audit For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998 January 1999 Financial Audit Division Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota 99-2 Centennial

More information

Teachers Retirement Association. Marriage Dissolution: Dividing TRA Benefits

Teachers Retirement Association. Marriage Dissolution: Dividing TRA Benefits Teachers Retirement Association Marriage Dissolution: Dividing TRA Benefits Marriage Dissolution: Dividing TRA Benefits Preface This booklet is designed to give all parties involved in a marriage dissolution

More information

Generic Local School District, Ohio Notes to the Basic Financial Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

Generic Local School District, Ohio Notes to the Basic Financial Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Pensions For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, information about the fiduciary net position of the pension plans and additions to/deductions

More information

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS) Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS) Revised July 2010 Disclaimer This presentation is based on current legislation and is subject to change without notice. This material is to be used

More information

A Guide to Your CalPERS. Service Credit Purchase Options

A Guide to Your CalPERS. Service Credit Purchase Options A Guide to Your CalPERS Service Credit Purchase Options This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...3 Understanding Service Credit...4 Service

More information

GEORGIA STATE EMPLOYEES POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFIT FUND & GEORGIA SCHOOL PERSONNEL POST-EMPLOYMENT

GEORGIA STATE EMPLOYEES POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFIT FUND & GEORGIA SCHOOL PERSONNEL POST-EMPLOYMENT GEORGIA STATE EMPLOYEES POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFIT FUND & GEORGIA SCHOOL PERSONNEL POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFIT FUND REPORT OF THE ACTUARY ON THE RETIREE MEDICAL VALUATIONS PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30,

More information

Your Retirement Plan

Your Retirement Plan Your Retirement Plan Special 20- and 25-Year Plans For PFRS Tier 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 Members (Sections 384, 384-d and 384-e) New York State Office of the State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli New York State

More information

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 7, 2015 Mr. Gary L. Harbin Executive Secretary Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Kentucky 479

More information

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09 FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09 Pension reform measures covering all of the State employee retirement systems were initially proposed in the Governor s Fiscal

More information

v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002

v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002 v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002 March 12, 2003 Board of Trustees Public Employees Retirement System of

More information

CRITICAL PLAN ELEMENTS. Public Employees Contributory Retirement Systems of Massachusetts. Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 32

CRITICAL PLAN ELEMENTS. Public Employees Contributory Retirement Systems of Massachusetts. Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 32 CRITICAL PLAN ELEMENTS Public Employees Contributory Retirement Systems of Massachusetts Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 32 INITIAL QUALIFICATION (Item 3a) The Taxpayer's Plan is intended to be a qualified

More information

Warwick Public School System

Warwick Public School System Warwick Public School System Actuarial Valuation Post Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions as of July 1, 2011 under Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45 (GASB 45) (Estimated Disclosures

More information

LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. your retirement benefits

LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. your retirement benefits LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS your retirement benefits Department of State Treasurer Raleigh, NC Revised January 2012 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE

More information

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION 2012 District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description This booklet is a Summary Plan Description (SPD) of the

More information

How To Determine The Cost Of A Juror Retirement Plan

How To Determine The Cost Of A Juror Retirement Plan GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2008 FEDERAL PENSIONS Judicial Survivors Annuities System Costs GAO-08-1104 September 2008 Accountability

More information

How To Get A Pension From The Pension Fund

How To Get A Pension From The Pension Fund Member s Guide to: DROP Deferred Retirement Option Plan www.op-f.org PLAN DEFERRED RETIREMENT DROP The Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) is an optional benefit that allows eligible police officers

More information

Table of Contents. Background and Certification Page 2 Introduction Page 3. Amortization Method Page 4

Table of Contents. Background and Certification Page 2 Introduction Page 3. Amortization Method Page 4 Racine County School Office Accounting and Sample Funding Report of Liabilities for Participants Post Employment Benefits as of January 1, 2011 Thru End of the Year December 31, 2011 January 2012 This

More information

Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability

Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability COMMISSION CO-CHAIRMEN Senator Michael Frerichs Representative Jil Tracy SENATE David Koehler Matt Murphy Chapin Rose David Syverson Donne Trotter

More information

State Government Retiree Health Benefits: Current Status and Potential Impact of New Accounting Standards

State Government Retiree Health Benefits: Current Status and Potential Impact of New Accounting Standards State Government Retiree Health Benefits: Current Status and Potential Impact of New Accounting Standards Appendix B: State Retiree Health Insurance Program Financial Report Data by Stan Wisniewski, Ph.D.

More information

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Municipality of Kingston Police Pension Plan Luzerne County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Municipality of Kingston Police Pension Plan Luzerne County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 COMPLIANCE AUDIT Municipality of Kingston Police Pension Plan Luzerne County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 July 2015 The Honorable Mayor and Municipal Council Municipality

More information

Understanding Montana's Public Employee Retirement Plans

Understanding Montana's Public Employee Retirement Plans Understanding Montana's Public Employee Retirement Plans By Rachel Weiss, Legislative Services Division Jon Moe, Legislative Fiscal Division November 2010 Purpose This report is an introduction to Montana's

More information

FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION PLAN

FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION PLAN FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION as of July 1, 2012 FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION The following summary is a brief description of the Florida

More information

The Public Employees Retirement System or The Alternate Benefit Program

The Public Employees Retirement System or The Alternate Benefit Program STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS Considerations for Choosing Between The Public Employees Retirement System or The Alternate Benefit Program February 2015

More information

Purchasing. Service Credit. Defined Benefit Plan. For members enrolled in the

Purchasing. Service Credit. Defined Benefit Plan. For members enrolled in the Purchasing Service Credit For members enrolled in the Defined Benefit Plan 2015 2016 Purchasing Service Credit Table of Contents Purchasing Service Credit...1 How to certify purchasable credit...2 Methods

More information

Benefits Payable upon Death

Benefits Payable upon Death Chapter 13 Benefits Payable upon Death Active Contributing Member Retired Member Other Considerations Beneficiary Designations Taxes Additional Information Application Procedures Benefits for Part-time

More information

Members Guide to: Survivor Benefits

Members Guide to: Survivor Benefits Members Guide to: Survivor Benefits Whether a police officer or firefighter dies before or after retirement, their survivors may be eligible to receive survivor benefits from OP&F. These benefits are generally

More information

FORCES NON-PUBLIC FUNDS EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN

FORCES NON-PUBLIC FUNDS EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S For CANADIAN FORCES NON-PUBLIC FUNDS EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN For year ended DECEMBER 31, 2009 AUDITORS' REPORT To the Chairperson and Members of the Employee Pension

More information

Attention: Michelle Schulz, Finance Director. The date of the valuation was December 31, 2014. The purpose of the actuarial valuation is to:

Attention: Michelle Schulz, Finance Director. The date of the valuation was December 31, 2014. The purpose of the actuarial valuation is to: March 2, 2015 The Board of Trustees Retiree Health Care Trust Fund, Michigan 48326-2753 Attention: Michelle Schulz, Finance Director This report contains the results of an actuarial valuation of the liabilities

More information

PURCHASE OF PRIOR EMPLOYER MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ELIGIBILITY 1

PURCHASE OF PRIOR EMPLOYER MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ELIGIBILITY 1 PURCHASE OF PRIOR SERVICE CREDIT EMPLOYER MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ELIGIBILITY 1 TYPES OF SERVICE CREDIT 2 Refunded Service Active Duty Military Service Leave of Absence for Active Duty Military Service

More information

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2012

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2012 Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2012 Retirement V-4 Long-Term Funding of KPERS Other Retirement reports available V-1 Kansas Public Employees Retirement System V-2 Kansas Defined Contribution Retirement

More information

SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSIONS

SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSIONS SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSIONS SUMMARY: Implements comprehensive public employee pension reform through enactment of the California Public Employees' Pension Reform

More information

Utah State Retirement Systems Overview. September 9, 2009 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Utah State Retirement Systems Overview. September 9, 2009 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Utah State Retirement Systems Overview September 9, 2009 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Utah State Retirement Systems Six Participant Systems Judges Public Employees

More information

MUNICIPAL PENSION PLAN FUNDING POLICY

MUNICIPAL PENSION PLAN FUNDING POLICY MUNICIPAL PENSION PLAN FUNDING POLICY Effective: 2007-03-28 Revision: 2015-09-30 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PREAMBLE... 4 2.0 AUTHORITIES... 5 3.0 BACKGROUND... 6 4.0 KEY RISKS... 8 5.0 BASIC PENSION BENEFITS

More information

State of Connecticut. Teachers Retirement System

State of Connecticut. Teachers Retirement System State of Connecticut Teachers Retirement System STATE OF CONNECTICUT CT TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD 765 ASYLUM AVENUE HARTFORD, CT 06105 Toll-Free 1-800-504-1102 (860) 241-8400 Fax (860) 525-6018 www.ct.gov/trb

More information

Income for your. Retirement

Income for your. Retirement Income for your Retirement Information about Your SDRS Retirement Benefits Class B Public Safety July 1, 2015 South Dakota Retirement System 222 East Capitol Avenue, Suite 8 P.O. Box 1098 Pierre, SD 57501

More information

How To Get A Pension From The Ersri

How To Get A Pension From The Ersri Employees Retirement System Of Rhode Island Handbook Membership & Retirement Reduce Contact: Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island 40 Fountain Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903-1854 Call Center:

More information

Summary Plan Description

Summary Plan Description Summary Plan Description Glatfelter Retirement Plan Program for Hourly Employees in the Spring Grove Group (Applicable to Employees hired prior to January 17, 2011) Effective January 1, 2012 DMEAST #14404512

More information

TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM SURS MISSION STATEMENT To secure and deliver the retirement benefits promised to our members. This booklet is intended to serve

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 135 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 135 1 Chapter 135. Retirement System for Teachers and State Employees; Social Security; State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees. Article 1. Retirement System for Teachers and State Employees. 135-1.

More information

MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND JANUARY 2004 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT FUND (612) 335-5950

MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND JANUARY 2004 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT FUND (612) 335-5950 MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND JANUARY 2004 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT FUND (612) 335-5950 1 RETIREMENT BOARD MEMBERS Agnes M.Gay President Dennis W. Schulstad Vice President

More information

The Provincial Judges and Masters in Chambers Registered and Unregistered Pension Plans. Members Handbook

The Provincial Judges and Masters in Chambers Registered and Unregistered Pension Plans. Members Handbook The Provincial Judges and Masters in Chambers Registered and Unregistered Pension Plans Members Handbook Revised September 2012 Using the Handbook This handbook provides a basic overview of the Provincial

More information

Florida Retirement System Pension Plan D R O P. Deferred Retirement Option Program

Florida Retirement System Pension Plan D R O P. Deferred Retirement Option Program Florida Retirement System Pension Plan D R O P Deferred Retirement Option Program Department of Management Services Division of Retirement July 2011 DISCLAIMER If questions of interpretation arise as a

More information

RHODE ISLAND STATE EMPLOYEES AND ELECTING TEACHERS OPEB

RHODE ISLAND STATE EMPLOYEES AND ELECTING TEACHERS OPEB RHODE ISLAND STATE EMPLOYEES AND ELECTING TEACHERS OPEB ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT JUNE 30, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Number -- Cover Letter A B C D E F G EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-5 Executive Summary

More information

SUMMARY February 2013 The plans: The impact of the crisis: The impact of pension plan reforms: Total state costs:

SUMMARY February 2013 The plans: The impact of the crisis: The impact of pension plan reforms: Total state costs: SUMMARY February 2013 THE STATE OF GEORGIA The plans: Georgia has three large state-administered pension systems, six smaller state-administered systems, and many locally-administered systems. The state

More information

House Committee on Pensions

House Committee on Pensions Teacher Retirement System of Texas House Committee on Pensions February 23, 2015 TRS The Teacher Retirement System manages a $132 billion trust fund and provides pension and health care benefits. TRS serves

More information

Plan Comparison Guide

Plan Comparison Guide Plan Comparison Guide The Virginia Retirement System Plan Comparison Guide provides a quick look at some of the similarities and differences among VRS Plan 1, VRS Plan 2 and the Hybrid Retirement Plan.

More information

Delaware Public Employees Retirement System State Employees Pension Plan. Retirement Planning. Presented by the State of Delaware Office of Pensions

Delaware Public Employees Retirement System State Employees Pension Plan. Retirement Planning. Presented by the State of Delaware Office of Pensions Delaware Public Employees Retirement System State Employees Pension Plan Retirement Planning Presented by the State of Delaware Office of Pensions Current Statistics (as of 6/30/13) 29,539 Retirees from

More information

ANN ARBOR CITY NOTICE

ANN ARBOR CITY NOTICE ANN ARBOR CITY NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. ORD-11-13 RETIREE HEALTH CARE BENEFITS PLAN AND TRUST An Ordinance to Amend Sections 1:700, 1:702, 1:704, 1:717, 1:723, 1:724 and 1:747 of Chapter 21, Retiree Health

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL30631 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress Updated January 21, 2005 Patrick J. Purcell Specialist in Social Legislation Domestic

More information

PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS AND THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION ( PBGC )

PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS AND THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION ( PBGC ) PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS AND THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION ( PBGC ) Scheduled for a Public Hearing Before the SENATE COMMITTEE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN 401K PLAN. (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2014)

STATE OF MICHIGAN 401K PLAN. (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2014) STATE OF MICHIGAN 401K PLAN (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2014) STATE OF MICHIGAN 401K PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF PLAN AND TRUST...1 1.1 Establishment of Plan....1 1.2

More information

CITY OF GROSSE POINTS FARMS SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RESTATE THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS

CITY OF GROSSE POINTS FARMS SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RESTATE THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS CITY OF GROSSE POINTS FARMS SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RESTATE THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE

More information

Understanding DROP. Deferred Retirement Option Program. Overview

Understanding DROP. Deferred Retirement Option Program. Overview Understanding DROP Deferred Retirement Option Program Fairfax County Retirement Systems 2015 PLEASE NOTE: The provisions referenced in this slide presentation are relevant for employees who were Fairfax

More information

Plan Comparison Guide

Plan Comparison Guide Plan Comparison Guide The Virginia Retirement System Plan Comparison Guide provides a quick look at some of the similarities and differences among VRS Plan 1, VRS Plan 2 and the Hybrid Retirement Plan.

More information

How To Get A Pension In Canada

How To Get A Pension In Canada United Food and Commercial Workers Union for further information Plan Administrator: William M. Mercer Suite #860, One Bentall Centre 505 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC, V7X 1M4 Pension Plan Canada Safeway

More information