AIRA Town Hall on MU Stage 3 and CEHRT Rule Comments
|
|
|
- Natalie McBride
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AIRA Town Hall on MU Stage 3 and CEHRT Rule Comments Mary Beth Kurilo, MPH, MSW, Policy and Planning Director, AIRA Eric Larson, Senior Technical Project Manager, AIRA
2 Goals for Today s Call Share information about AIRA s current compiled draft comments on the Meaningful Use Stage 3, Certified EHR Technology, and MU Modifications Proposed Rules Poll the community on which comments have general consensus, and which need further discussion Discuss and approach a consensus response But a window of fine-tuning is still open 2
3 Process for Collecting Community Comments CMS and ONC Proposed Rules were released and shared with AIRA membership on March 20, 2015, followed by CMS Modifications Proposed rules on April 28, 2015 Held community call to discuss IIS impact with Jim Daniel, ONC on April 16, 2015 Solicited member comments up through May 6, 2015 Thank you to the many AIRA members who submitted comments! Held Standards and Interoperability Steering Committee (SISC) calls to discuss and refine comments on May 11 th and May 13th Holding All-Member Town Hall to share and discuss comments today 3
4 Approach for Today s Call Provide brief overview of comments planned for submission with limited discussion Conduct polls to gather community agreement Circle back on comments in need of further discussion Next Step: Refine and share written comments for integration as desired into members organizations comments 4
5 CMS Rule Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-Stage 3 Overall Goals: Align all three stages of MU into single program/rule as an option in 2017 and as a requirement for all providers in 2018 Align reporting periods Provide simplified objectives and measures Comments Due: 5pm ET, May 29,
6 ONC Rule 2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications Overall Goals: Provides new 2015 Base EHR Definition Eliminates optional/required criteria for measures systems can choose measures from selected list Comments Due: 5pm ET, May 29,
7 CMS Rule Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Modifications to Meaningful Use in Overall Goals: Align and streamline the MU program by removing reporting requirements on measures which have become redundant, duplicative, or topped out through advancements in EHR function and provider performance for Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Comments Due: 5pm ET, June 15 th,
8 Summary of Objective 8: Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting Proposed Objective: The EP, eligible hospital, or Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) is in active engagement with a PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using certified EHR technology, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Six possible measures to meet the objective Eligible professionals must meet three measures Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals must meet four measures 8
9 9
10 CMS MU Stage 3 EHR reporting period would change so that all providers would report under a full calendar year timeline with a limited exception for first time MU participants AIRA supports the changes to both the reporting period start and end dates and the duration: Calendar year reporting Full year reporting period Exception if you are a Medicaid EP or EH demonstrating MU for the first time, then a continuous 90-day period 10 CMS MU Poll #1:
11 CMS MU Stage 3 State Flexibility The rule proposes to offer state flexibility in the PH and clinical data registry reporting objective as long as it does not exceed requirements for stage 3 rule AIRA is seeking clarification to determine if State Flexibility to specify the means of transmission of the data includes Immunization Registries or not This could affect transport (CDC SOAP WSDL or other IIS preferred transport) This could affect HL7 local IGs which are derived from the National IG AIRA is recommending that IIS be allowed a level of state flexibility 11 CMS MU Poll #2:
12 CMS MU Stage 3 Objective 8: Public Health Objective 8 moves IIS away from core (required) to 1 of 6 measures, of which EPs must meet 3 and EH/CAH must meet 4 AIRA is recommending that IIS remain as a core measure IIS was a core measure in Stage 2 Concern with jeopardizing existing transmissions if providers opt to implement other measures and neglect updating for Stage 3 IIS measure (Submission and Query/Response) 12 CMS MU Poll #3:
13 CMS MU Stage 3 Ongoing Submission Ongoing submission phrase was replaced with Active engagement Providers must still respond to requests within 30 days No other changes suggested to promote actual forward movement towards interoperability AIRA is in favor of the new phrasing However, AIRA is further recommending that public health would have authority to determine if respondent is working to make actual progress not just responding 13 CMS MU Poll #4:
14 CMS MU Stage 3 Active Engagement Providers that have registered in previous years do not need to submit additional registration. AIRA is seeking clarification if this applies to IIS since the immunization measure adds bi-directional onto existing Stage 1 and 2 submission requirements. 14 CMS MU Poll #5:
15 CMS MU Stage 3 Objective 8: IIS Query/Response Immunization Measure now includes Submission and Bidirectional (query/response) exchange Comment #1: AIRA supports the inclusion of query/response into the immunization measure, as it represents significant value for providers and patients. Over half of IIS have query response in production This number is increasing, and could include most, if not all, IIS by 2017/ CMS MU Poll #6:
16 CMS MU Stage 3 Objective 8: IIS Query/Response Immunization Measure now includes Submission and Bidirectional (query/response) exchange Comment #2 (for consideration): AIRA requests that the final rule allow registries to declare their readiness for submission separate from query, to ensure that the current immunization reporting pathways are not disrupted in the expansion to bidirectional exchange 16 CMS MU Poll #7:
17 CMS MU Stage 3 Exclusion for Immunization 2 clauses in the exclusion criteria were carried forward from Stage 2 If the IIS isn t capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the reporting period IIS doesn t declare readiness to receive immunization data AIRA is seeking clarification that the first bullet (although identical to previous stage) doesn t mean an exclusion can be claimed if an IIS has local HL7 requirements AIRA is noting that the second bullet is void of exclusion language for bidirectional which needs to be considered 17 CMS MU Poll #8:
18 ONC CEHRT Rule Base EHR Contradiction exists between Table 2 which states transmission to IIS is not included in what is defined as a Base EHR, but a footnote suggests that it s possible transmission to IIS could be part of the Base EHR Concern is that of confusion for implementers AIRA is requesting the final rule clarify the inclusion and timing of the measure 18 ONC Poll #9:
19 ONC CEHRT Rule Means of Transmission The NPRM is silent on transport in the Transmission to IIS section The NPRM section devoted to SOAP specifies XDR/XDM standard AIRA is asking confirmation that transport will continue to be allowed to be specified at the state or jurisdictional level AIRA also acknowledges the CDC SOAP WSDL as a common interface across the community 19 ONC Poll #10:
20 ONC CEHRT Rule Minimum Standard Code Sets Three important items in this section Requires release 1.5 of the National Implementation Guide Table Lists code sets for transmission to IIS, but neglects MVX Requires NDC as the code set for recording administered vaccines rather than CVX/MVX AIRA supports release 1.5 and asks for MVX to be included in table AIRA is NOT in favor of requiring only NDC for administered, but rather prefer that CVX/MVX continue to be used, while also requiring NDC More on this in the next two slides 20 ONC Poll #11:
21 ONC CEHRT Rule Recording Historical Doses NPRM asks for comments on 1 of 2 approaches: 1) Use CVX and MVX (if known) 2) Use NDC syntax and create NDC-like codes for vaccines of unspecified formulation AIRA s recommendation is to stay with our current approach which is option 1 above Further, AIRA added information from MIROW on the definition of historical and administered doses 21 ONC Poll #12:
22 ONC CEHRT Rule Recording Administered Doses NPRM is requiring NDC for administered doses: Cites 2D barcoding, inventory management, and patient safety for reasons NDC is best suited for administered doses 22 AIRA s recommendation is to stay with our current approach of CVX/MVX but also require NDC as a secondary representation (HL7 can carry both in one message) Concerns with moving to NDC: NDC s are much more fluid and CVX/MVX NDC is not a commonly leveraged data element currently in EHRs requiring significant development Unclear at this time if NDC s would be appropriate for bidirectional exchange ONC Poll #13:
23 ONC CEHRT Rule Bidirectional Exchange Immunization Measure now includes Submission and Bidirectional (query/response) exchange Refer to previous poll results 23
24 ONC CEHRT Rule Imm History Reconciliation NPRM seeking comment on whether immunization history reconciliation should be considered AIRA believes that the inclusion of immunization history reconciliation capability would add significant value to the EHR product while lowering the burden on the end user, who otherwise would need to rekey the queried data into their EHR manually 24 ONC Poll #14:
25 ONC CEHRT Rule Version release 1.5 NPRM cites Version release 1.5 for transmission to IIS AIRA is requesting greater specificity regarding the use of release 1.5 to point out the profiles required for submission (Z22 and Z23) and bidirectional (Z44, Z23, Z33, and Z42) 25 ONC Poll #15:
26 ONC CEHRT Rule Race and Ethnicity NPRM cites a Health IT module must be able to express both detailed races and ethnicity according to the Race and Ethnicity CDC code system and the aggregate OMB code for each race and ethnicity identified by the patient The Race and Ethnicity CDC code set contains 900+ codes AIRA is requesting that the traditional aggregate OMB codes be used 26 ONC Poll #16:
27 ONC CEHRT Rule NDC to CVX Mapping NPRM believes it would not be a heavy burden to map from an NDC code to a CVX code because a mapping from NDC codes to CVX codes is publicly available AIRA believes mapping NDC to CVX may, in fact, be a more challenging effort in a dynamic environment. Given that new NDCs can be created at the discretion of vaccine manufacturers, it may be more challenging to be timely in maintaining a complex mapping table that can then be leveraged by all EHRs (and their providers) as well as IIS. 27 ONC Poll #17:
28 ONC CEHRT Rule Common Clinical Data Set NPRM typo incorrectly linking Transmission to IIS with C-CDA Release 2.0 AIRA simply points out the typo for correction 28 ONC Poll #18:
29 ONC CEHRT Rule Future Certification Criteria NPRM states: We believe this proposal best addresses the full range of health IT that has and might be certified to adopted certification criteria now and in the future AIRA response: While the Meaningful Use incentive program will conclude with Stage 3 (per the CMS rule), it s not entirely clear if the standards named in certification rule will be updated in future versions. Please clarify if the EHR certification program will continue to evolve in the future. 29 ONC Poll #19:
30 ONC CEHRT Rule MVX Codes NPRM states: The MVX table includes both active and inactive vaccines available in the U.S. AIRA response: AIRA wishes to clarify that the MVX code set isn t a table of vaccines, but rather vaccine manufacturers 30 ONC Poll #20:
31 CMS Mods to MU Summary This rule attempts to streamline requirements for stages 1, 2, and 3 AIRA is seeking clarification on the summary section is it is unclear which parts of the NPRM will actually be retroactive to 2015 and which will not 31 CMS Mods Poll #21:
32 CMS Mods to MU IIS Reporting AIRA is seeking clarification as the Modifications rule appears to escalate the timetable for all Stage 3 Public Health readiness. For IIS, this would mean bidirectional exchange would be accelerated into this Modification Rule. AIRA is supportive of bidirectional in Stage 3, but not as part of the Modification Rule directed at the timeline 32 CMS Mods Poll #22:
33 Open Conversation on Comments Needing Further Discussion 33
34 Next Steps AIRA and representatives from the SISC will continue to fine tune comments, with the goal of sharing with AIRA membership by May 18 for integration into members organizations comments Final comments will also be shared and discussed with partner organizations 34
35 Thank You! Please Contact Us with Questions or Comments Mary Beth Kurilo Eric Larson
Eligible Professional EHR Incentive Program Objectives and Measures for 2016 Objective 10 of 10 Date updated: February 4, 2016
Eligible Professional EHR Incentive Program Objectives and Measures for 2016 Objective 10 of 10 Date updated: February 4, 2016 Public Health Reporting Objective Measure Options The EP is in active engagement
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2 Jennifer Boaz Transformation Support Specialist Proprietary 1 Definitions AIU = Adopt, Implement or Upgrade EP = Eligible Professional API = Application
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for 2015-2017 June 23, 2015
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for 2015-2017 June 23, 2015 Today s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Elisabeth Renczkowski, Content Specialist Disclaimer
Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, 2015. Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee
Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, 2015 Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee Topics Payment Data Participation Years and Payments Meaningful Use Progression
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview CMS recently released a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support The following is a summary of the Meaningful Use Modifications for 2015-2017.
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists Learning Objectives Gain understanding of Modified Stage 2 2015-2017 program requirements
Modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary
CY 2014 MPFS Final Rule Summary December 3, 2013 Page 1 Modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary SEPTEMBER 2014 Page 2 TABLE
Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016. Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016
Image Research, LLC Christopher B. Sullivan, Ph.D. 2901 Quail Rise Court, Tallahassee, FL 32309 Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs Updated November 2015 Glossary CAH Critical access hospitals CEHRT Certified electronic health record technology
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015 Elizabeth S. Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017 The requirements for Meaningful Use attestation have changed due to the recently released Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Modified Stage 2: through 2017 November 10, Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] November 10, 1 Key Concepts for Modified Stage 2 Restructured
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet CMS recently published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals,
Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015
Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015 Disclaimer» CMS must protect the rulemaking process and comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. During the
CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rule
2015 Modifications for Stage 1 and Stage 2 CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rule June 11, 2015 Nick Maisel, EHR Program Coordinator Office of the Governor Mississippi Division of Medicaid OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017
Click to edit Master title style Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory & Incentive Program Analyst 12/14/2015 1 1 Agenda 1. Overview of M-CEITA
9/9/2015. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Proposed Rule On April 15, 2015 CMS Issued a new proposal rule for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive
Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0
Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Compiled by: Sanjeev Tandon and Mark Jensen at CDC/OPHSS/CSELS/OD from the CMS & ONC Stage 2 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Meaningful
Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Proposed Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers Vernessa T. Pollard and Nicole Liffrig Molife April 2015 With the publication of the Stage 3 Meaningful Use Rule
CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use
CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use Presenter: Sherry Wallace-Barnes, RN Envision Management Solutions, LLC 1 Meaningful Use 2015 Final
TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS
TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures... 3 Eligible Professionals 495.6(j)(14)... 3 Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access
Damon A. Ferlazzo, MPA Clinical Use and Benefits of State Immunization Information Systems August 21, 2014
Damon A. Ferlazzo, MPA Clinical Use and Benefits of State Immunization Information Systems August 21, 2014 What are Immunization Information Systems (IIS)? [ ]confidential, population-based, computerized
ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab
ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab For APHL Annual Meeting June 2011 By Wes Kennemore, APHL and Jennifer McGehee, CDC DISCLAIMER This presentation was supported by
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
Program Year 2015: Public Health Reporting Objective & Supporting Documentation
Program Year 2015: Public Health Reporting Objective & Supporting Documentation Valorie A. Vigil, Staff Manager Benjamin Rogers, Program Manager December 2015 New Mexico Human Services Department Medical
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Old The Changes The New Continuing Medical Education Disclaimer hi i if h i i S d Ch i This is to certify that Marnivia Spencer and Chris Hudson have disclosed
Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015
Summary of Care Objective Measures Exclusion Table of Contents Definition of Terms Attestation Requirements Additional Information Certification and Standards Criteria Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful
CMS EHR Incentive Programs:
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015 The following document is intended to aid in preparation for gathering necessary information to attest in early 2016. All Medicfusion
Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards
Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards Robert Snelick, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Sheryl Taylor, Booz-Allen Hamilton (BAH) Use of
Re: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017; Proposed Rule
Submitted Electronically Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attn: CMS-3311-P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH
MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH Seth Foldy, MD MPH FAAFP Director, Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office NCVHS November 15, 2011 Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory
Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program
Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Presented by: Layne Roberts, Data Analyst Overview NC MEDICAID EHR
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measures: 1 (Complete
How To Improve Health Care Quality
Meaningful Use: At the Crossroads between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Presented by: Bruce Eckert, National Practice Director Date: April 19, 2013 Heading Agenda Ariel 40 Stage 2 Major Changes Payment Adjustments
PREPARING FOR EMR PROGRAM SUCCESS IN 2016 12/10/2015. December 15, 2015. Travis Skinner, CPA Senior Managing Consultant tskinner@bkd.
PREPARING FOR EMR PROGRAM SUCCESS IN 2016 December 15, 2015 Travis Skinner, CPA Senior Managing Consultant [email protected] Michael Orr, CPA Director [email protected] David McDonald, CPA Director [email protected]
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH Program Timeline Meaningful Use Timeline Meaningful Use Stages st year 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00 0 0 AIU $,50 3 TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 AIU
Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule
Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule Background In order to receive incentives for the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) under either the Medicare or Medicaid (Medi-Cal) incentive
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits Presented by: Deb Anderson, CPHIMS HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (EHR)
The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule: Overview and Outlook
The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule: Overview and Outlook Devi Mehta, JD, MPH Cand. 1 Taylor Burke, JD, LLM 2 Lara Cartwright-Smith, JD, MPH 3 Jane Hyatt Thorpe, JD 4 Introduction On August 23, 2012,
HIMSS Public Policy Initiatives in 2015: Using Health IT to Enable Healthcare Transformation Jeff Coughlin Senior Director Federal & State Affairs
HIMSS Public Policy Initiatives in 2015: Using Health IT to Enable Healthcare Transformation Jeff Coughlin Senior Director Federal & State Affairs March 26, 2015 Agenda Meaningful Use Stage 3 NPRM 2015
Presented by: Matthew Swenny, I-CARE Illinois Department of Public Health
Presented by: Matthew Swenny, I-CARE Illinois Department of Public Health If you have any questions for our speaker during the presentation, please enter them into the question box on your control panel
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Today 1. Meaningful Use (MU) 2. 2/3rds of MU relates
Re: CMS 3323 NC, Request for Information (RFI): Certification Frequency and Requirements for the Reporting of Quality Measures Under CMS Programs
February 5, 2016 Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 445-G Washington, DC 20201 Re: CMS 3323
Meaningful Use Stage 2
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Sarah Leake, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 54163 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of the Secretary 45 CFR Part 170 RIN 0991 AB82 Health Information
https://app.azdhs.gov/meaningfuluse
Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals EHs and CAHs Profile 1 Profile Please provide the Public Health Meaningful Use Registration of Intent information below. All fields are required. Type of
Navigating the Trends in Health Care Today. MEDITECH Solutions for Meaningful Use and Interoperability
Navigating the Trends in Health Care Today MEDITECH Solutions for Meaningful Use and Interoperability Certification Update EHRs Meeting ONC 2014 Standards "There is no such thing as being 'Stage 1 Certified'
