REGIOTRAM UTRECHT OPERATIONAL MODELLING FINAL REPORT BASE MODEL JANUARY 2016 REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING JANUARY 2016

Transcription

1 REGIOTRAM UTRECHT OPERATIONAL MODELLING FINAL REPORT BASE MODEL

2 LIST OF CONTENT Process Methodology Previous model work Scenarios Input data Schematic open track infrastructure diagrams Vehicles Run times Results Scenario C1 Results Scenario C2 Conclusion

3 PROCESS

4 OPERATIONAL MODELLING PROCESS Prior consultant: Analysis from operational modelling Modifications of operational requirements Built-up of a complete new OpenTrack model Base scenarios (C1 and C2) to be modelled Analysis of operational key numbers

5 METHODOLOGY

6 METHODOLOGY Collection and documentation of all infrastructure changes (against the November 2013 version) for the operational model (based on Project Step 1 Modification Speed Profile) Implementing the line infrastructure in a new OpenTrack model (no update) Building of the two operational schemes (Phase C1 and C2) for the through running services on the SUNIJ- and Uithof line Calculation of operational numbers run times number of vehicles system efficiency turnaround times

7 PREVIOUS MODEL WORK

8 PREVIOUS MODEL WORK The following BRU reports form the main input for this updated model work Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 1_report, February 2013 Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part A_B_v1, November 2013 Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C 2020_v1, November 2013 They are referred to in this report as Prior Ops study

9 MODIFICATIONS OF BASE DATA COMPARED TO PRIOR OPS STUDY Alignment of Uithof lijn Modifications on SUNIJ-Lijn Speed profile considering modifications agreed in Project Step 1 Uithof lijn (no modifications) SUNIJ lijn (significant modifications on Ijsselstein branch and section Nieuwegein Stadscentrum Utrecht Centraal)

10 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS TAKEN OVER FROM PREVIOUS MODEL Regulation at Utrecht OVT to assure needed punctuality Influence of bus traffic at Utrecht OVT Critical: Turnaround in Utrecht OVT to permit short shuttle between Uithof and Utrecht Turn around time: OVT minimum 175 s plus 85 s for passenger exchange P+R De Uithof max. 300 s Prior track layout

11 TURNAROUND TIMES Turnaround time: Technical minimum turnaround time: Technical minimum turnaround Dwell time for boarding and alighting Buffer time Minimum planned turnaround time Vehicle shut down: Driver changing cab: Vehicle ramp up: Total: 20 sec about 2 min 20 s 3 min 4 min minimum turnaround time including Sum of turnaround times at both ends of line shall be between 10% and 20% of overall runtime Dwell time for boarding and alighting Distribution depending on traffic demand and platform access Can be allowed while driver is changing the cab (at least in case of delay) Additional buffer time Remaining time to start at planned departure time

12 DUTY ROASTER EFFICIENCY Efficiency Definition: Runtime / (Runtimes + turnaround times) Shall ideally be between 80% and 90% 80 % or lower In case the value is below 80 % the (non-productive) turn-around time is compared to the (productive) run time too high The number of vehicles will increase leading to finally higher investment and higher operational cost The system robustness on the other hand is high as delays can be quickly re-covered 90 % or higher In case the value is 90 % or higher the (non-productive) turn-around time is compared to the (productive) run time too low The system robustness drops as delays cannot be re-covered anymore On the other hand the number of vehicles will decrease leading to lower investment and eventually lower operational cost But the system is not reliable anymore and the attractiveness for passengers goes down

13 DUTY ROSTER OF PRIOR OPS STUDY Operational Scenario C Nieuwegein Zuid P+R De Uithof: Ijsselstein Zuid P+R De Uithof: OVT P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min Headway 12 min Headway 2x 12 min Duty roster as follows: Ijsselstein Zuid Nieuwegein Stadscentrum OVT P+R De Uithof Nieuwegein Zuid

14 KEY NUMBERS FROM PRIOR OPS STUDY Nieuwegein Ijsselstein Runtime PRU NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min 30 sec Runtime ISS/NWG PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 56 min Turnaround time min 7-8 min Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min 20 sec To OVT 16 min 20 sec Turnaround time P+R Uithof Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 4-5 min 6 min Duty roster 156 min 168 min Duty roster performance 83% 87% Number of vehicles (without reserve) 13*2 units 14*2 units

15 SCENARIOS

16 2 OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS TO BE MODELLED Scenarios based on prior scenario C (see report Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C 2020_v1, November 2013) Morning peak hour to be modelled (6:00-8:00) to generate all operational numbers (e.g. run times, number of vehicles, system efficiency, turnaround times) Scenario C1 with reduced headway (not modelled before): 8 veh/h/direction on the SUNIJ line (7,5 min headway OVT Nieuwegein Stadscentrum, 15 min on branches to Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein), 16 veh/h/direction on the Uithof line (3,75 min headway). Scenario C2 (as modelled before Scenario C): 10 veh/h/direction on the SUNIJ line (6 min headway OVT Nieuwegein Stadscentrum, 12 min on branches to Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein), 20 veh/h/direction on the Uithof line (3 min headway).

17 SCENARIO C1 Nieuwegein Zuid P+R De Uithof: Ijsselstein Zuid P+R De Uithof: OVT P+R De Uithof: Headway 15 min Headway 15 min Headway 2x 15 min Ijsselstein Zuid 4/h Nieuwegein Stadscentrum 8/h OVT 16/h P+R De Uithof 4/h Nieuwegein Zuid

18 SCENARIO C2 Nieuwegein Zuid P+R De Uithof: Ijsselstein Zuid P+R De Uithof: OVT P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min Headway 12 min Headway 2x 12 min Ijsselstein Zuid 5/h Nieuwegein Stadscentrum 10/h OVT 20/h P+R De Uithof 5/h Nieuwegein Zuid

19 INPUT DATA

20 BUILT-UP OF A NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL Infrastructure: Uithof-Lijn: Alignment plans with few changes compared to elder planning ( ) SUNIJ-Lijn: Alignment plans ( ) Operation: Consideration of modified speed profiles ( ) Dwell times as in prior Ops study No negative effects of bus traffic at OVT and University considered Rolling stock: Implementation of new CAF vehicles

21 NEW TRACK LAYOUT AT UTRECHT OVT Diamond crossover allows an efficient operation at the OVT intermediate terminus Turnaround of short line from P&R Uithof to OVT No left side operation for departing courses to P&R Uithof necessary New track layout

22 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: SPEED MODIFICATION Nieuwegein Zuid Stadscentrum: No change of maximum speed because of local restrictions No change of runtime in this section

23 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: SPEED MODIFICATION Stadscentrum Utrecht OVT C: No significant effect on runtime No change of runtime

24 SPEED COMPARISON Stadscentrum Ijsselstein Zuid Significant modifications of maximum speed

25 NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (1/3) Alignment Uithof line Description Date Source 01_JBP-OVT.pdf Situatie Tracédeel Doorkoppeling ITC Ontwerpverantwoording VO+ incl. bijllagen I-XIV and additional documents Ontwerpverantwoording Movares RVT Schets Uithoflijn.pdf Railverkeerstechnische Shets De Uithof Lijn Movares DSM UHL DO _ACAD_3D.dwg Alignment Uithofline Nov 12 Uithoflijn_overview.pdf Nov 12 WP119-BNS-200-0##_C30-FKU-AU-1300###_v5.0.pdf Contracttekening Traminfrastructuur Situatie fietspad Cambridgelaan De Uithof Movares Alignment SUNIJ line Description Date Source pdf, pdf PVS-meting SUNIJ ProRail C30-HBE-AU #_V1.0.pdf SUNIJ-Lijn: Grootschalige Verwanging Infrastructuur Definitief Ontwerp Baan en spoor Movares C30-FKU-AU _v3.0.dwg Jaarbeursplein Overzichtstekening Sporenplan Tijdelijke eindhalte SUNIJ-lijn Definitief Ontwerp ITC 330_BN~1.PDF - 330_BN~4.PDF, Vraagsspecificatie Tijdelijke Eindhalte Jaarbeursplein ITC ORblad #.pdf OR-Bladen Bestuur Regio Utrecht OBE blad 0x #,### - #,### -... #.pdf OBE-Blads Bestuur Regio Utrecht

26 NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (2/3) Speed profile SUNIJ line Description Date Source snelheden SUNIJ versie 3JV.xls Baanvak snelheid SUNIJ Feb 13 Bestuur Regio Utrecht SUNIJ lijn snelheden.xlsx Baanvak snelheid SUNIJ Dez 14 Bestuur Regio Utrecht Operation SUNIJ + Uithofline Description Date Source OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 1_report.pdf Report Phase 1 Feb 13 TTK 1311_Utrecht_SUNIJ_PHAB_vehicles.pdf OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES Phase A and B - working day ( ) Number of rolling stock required TTK Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part A_B_v1.pdf OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES Report Project-phase 2 Phases A and B (Network from 2016/2018 on) TTK Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C 2020_v1.pdf OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES Report Project-phase 2 Phase C (Network from 2020 on) TTK E82-RWÖ-KA versie 1.0.pdf Dynamische simulatie stationsgebied Utrecht Movares

27 NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (3/3) Vehicles SUNIJ + Uithofline Description Date Source Sneltram vehicles sunij maatvoering schoon.pdf Algemeen Plan Sneltram NS Beschrijving Treinstellen Sunij Def.pdf Beschrivingen Treinstellen 1989 NS CAF vehicles Q A0_T_CJTO_GENERAL_UNIDAD_5_MODULOS - UTRECHT-_H1.pdf Overzicht Basis Variant Tramvoertuig CAF Q A0_T_CJTO_GENERAL_UNIDAD_7_MODULOS - UTRECHT-_H1.pdf Overzicht Lange Variant Tramvoertuig CAF Tramontwerp.pdf TRAMONTWERP CAF Bijlage TECHNISCHE BESCHRIJVING TRACTIEAPPARATUUR.pdf TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION TRACTION EQUIPMENT FOR UTRECHT TRAM CAF Gewichten.pdf Gewichten standaard/lange tramstel CAF Overzichtstekening Standaard Tram (33m).pdf Overzichtstekening (Draft) CAF

28 SCHEMATIC OPEN TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE DIAGRAMS

29 NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: IJSSELSTEIN ZUID - DOORSLAG To Nieuwegein Stadscentrum Ijsselstein Zuid

30 NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: ST. ANTONIUS ZIEKEHUIS / NIEUWEGEIN ZUID NIEUWEGEIN STADSCENTRUM From Ijsselstein Zuid Nieuwegein Stadscentrum To Wijkersloot Nieuwegein Zuid

31 NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: WIJKERSLOOT - ZUILENSTEIN To Jaarbeursplein From Nieuwegein Stadscentrum

32 NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: GRAADT VAN ROGGENWEG VASCO DA GAMALAAN Jarbeursplein To OVT From Westraven

33 OPENTRACK MODEL: VAARTSCHE RIJN OVT UTRECHT C To P+R De Uithof Utrecht OVT From Jaarbeursplein

34 OPENTRACK MODEL: GALGENWAARD P+R DE UITHOF P+R De Uithof From OVT

35 (MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM IJSSELSTEIN ZUID OVT

36 (MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM SUNIJ LINE NIEUWEGEIN ZUID P+R DE UITHOF

37 (MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM OVT IJSSELSTEIN ZUID

38 (MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM SUNIJ LINE P+R DE UITHOF NIEUWEGEIN ZUID

39 VEHICLES

40 VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION AS IN PRIOR OPS STUDY 32 m single unit m single unit combined to a 75 m double unit

41 NEW CAF VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION Traction effort curve: Acceleration Traction effort EL 4 (4 standees per m 2 ) identical with curve EL 6.67 Acceleration limited for comfort reasons to 1,2 m/s 2 (Force) 33 m single unit m single unit

42 NEW CAF VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION Can be coupled to a double unit (simulated as one vehicle train)

43 SHORT AND LONG VEHICLES The CAF vehicles tested are 33 m long vehicles. In the case extended vehicle would be used, they would need one motorised bogie more. From experience the performance would be in this case the same as for the short vehicle.

44 RUN TIMES

45 OPERATIONAL KEY NUMBERS: CALIBRATION RUNTIME Comparison of runtimes based on vehicle and infrastructure from Prior Ops Study New OpenTrack model: New model with similar runtimes compared with Prior Ops Study 2014 with the same vehicles assumed

46 SPEED COMPARISON Maximum speed adapted in the model Simulation results: No significant change of runtime

47 VEHICLE EFFECTS ON RUNTIME Comparison of undisturbed runtimes (to compare vehicle influence): Single line one-directional simulation Remark: Run times without operational effects are shorter than system runtimes CAF vehicle shows shorter runtimes than prior reference vehicle of about 1 min between P&R De Uithof and Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein respectively From To Reference vehicle CAF vehicle Difference P+R De Uithof Ijsselstein Zuid 00:52:45 00:51:32 00:01:13 Ijsselstein Zuid P+R De Uithof 00:54:07 00:53:05 00:01:03 From To Reference vehicle CAF vehicle Difference P+R De Uithof Nieuwegein Zuid 00:47:17 00:45:55 00:01:22 Nieuwegein Zuid P+R De Uithof 00:47:22 00:46:17 00:01:05

48 CHARACTERISTIC RUNTIMES ALONG SPECIFIC SECTIONS

49 RESULTS SCENARIO C2

50 SCENARIO C2 (12 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL IJSSELSTEIN ZUID P+R DE UITHOF

51 SCENARIO C2 (12 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL NIEUWEGEIN ZUID P+R DE UITHOF

52 OVT PLATFORM OCCUPANCY Tracks 1 & 2 respectively 3 & 4 use the same platform between the two tracks. From the safety point of view considering the amount of passengers at one point of time on a platform there boarding and alighting at the same time shall be avoided. Scenario C1: Tracks 1 & 2: No occupancy at the same time OVT Platform occupancy Arrival at track 3 just after departure at track 4 Scenario C2: Arrival and departure at track 2 while track 1 is not used Arrival and departure at track 3 while track 4 is not used

53 KEY NUMBERS NEW AND ADAPTED MODEL SCENARIO C2 (MODIFIED OVT LAYOUT, SPEED MODIFICATIONS, CAF VEHICLE) HEADWAY 12 / 6 / 3 MIN Nieuwegein Ijsselstein Runtime PRU NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 46,5 min 54 min Runtime ISS/NWG PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min Turnaround time 13,5 min 11 min Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min To OVT 16 min Turnaround time P+R Uithof Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 5 min 6 min Duty roster 156 min 168 min Duty roster performance 80% 83% Number of vehicles (without reserve) 13*2 units 14*2 units

54 RISK ANALYSIS SCENARIO C2 Ramboll/MMD have calculated 54 vehicles without reserve for the scenario C2 With sufficient turnaround times a reliable operation can be assured. This implies the avoiding the change of line (Ijsselstein/Nieuwegein) at the turnaround in P+R De Uithof A further optimisation would not be recommended regarding the risk of longer dwell times as a result of different door opening and closing times of the CAF vehicles. Precondition for this operational concept would be: Using a short turnaround at OVT and The change of line at P+R De Uithof for the intermediate short line service P+R OVT (combination of Nieuwegein and Ijsselstein line).

55 RESULTS SCENARIO C1

56 SCENARIO C1 (15 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL IJSSELSTEIN ZUID P+R DE UITHOF

57 SCENARIO C1 (15 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL NIEUWEGEIN ZUID P+R DE UITHOF

58 KEY NUMBERS NEW AND ADAPTED MODEL SCENARIO C1 (MODIFIED OVT LAYOUT, SPEED MODIFICATIONS, CAF VEHICLE) HEADWAY 15 / 7,5 / 3,75 MIN Nieuwegein Ijsselstein Runtime PRU NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 46,5 min 53,5 min Runtime ISS/NWG PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min Turnaround time 10,5 min 11,5 min Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min To OVT 16 min Turnaround time P+R Uithof Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 4,5 min 4 min Duty roster 150 min 165 min Duty roster performance 83% 84% Number of vehicles (without reserve) 10*2 units 11*2 units

59 RISK ANALYSIS SCENARIO C1 So far Regiotram calculated with 27 for the Uithof start operation and then 26 options on top of this, in total 53, 26 vehicles are today operating on the SUNIJ-line. But this takes not the efficiency gains of the combined operation into account. Ramboll/MMD have calculated 42 vehicles for this without reserve Short turn-around times at P+R and OVT High efficiency There is a risk is that due to higher stop times (the doors at the SIG trams are now opening at a speed below 3 km/h, the new CAF trams will have to go down to 0 km/h) the gain in run times can be lost again. In this case a reliable operation can be assured by using 2 more vehicles and longer turn-around times.

60 CONCLUSION

61 CONCLUSION New OpenTrack model: New model infrastructure built-up Model results of Prior Ops Study confirmed Runtime of CAF vehicles in preliminary model runs slightly shorter than reference vehicle from Prior Ops Study Effect of runtime on key number of scenario C2 with 12 / 6 / 3 min headway (shorter runtime, longer turnaround) Concept of scenario C1 with 15 / 7,5 / 3-4 min headway implemented Modification of speed profile does not affect the runtime significantly Model ready to use for further analysis and new scenarios

62 Click to edit Master text styles Nils Jänig, Director Ramboll Transport T +49 (0) E nij@ramboll.com Joost Bolck, Business Development Manager Mott MacDonald T E joost.bolck@mottmac.nl