# CONSTRUCTING A LOGICAL ARGUMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

2 Evidence The evidence you use to support your argument should be reliable: that is, it should be accurate, relevant, representative and sufficient. Be careful to distinguish a fact, something that is verifiable; from an inference, a conclusion based on available evidence; from an opinion, a belief not based upon absolute certainty or knowledge, but which nonetheless seems valid to the individual. FACT: George is driving a Mercedes 250SL. INFERENCE: George is doing well financially. [In reality, George could have borrowed the Mercedes, be taking it for a test drive or stolen it.] OPINION: George is a great guy because he is driving a Mercedes. Three commonly used sources of evidence in business writing are: statistics; examples (i.e., specific instances of the general point being made); and the testimonies of experts. Patterns of Reasoning Facts alone rarely, if ever, convince. In order to make a persuasive argument, facts need to be related to one another in a logical manner. A logical statement is a conclusion based on reasoning. Logical statements depend on inferences drawn from facts, but are not necessarily facts themselves. If the conclusion (or recommendation) is to be valid, the reasoning pattern must follow certain commonly accepted rules. In Western thought, there are two basic reasoning patterns, inductive and deductive: Inductive reasoning: In inductive reasoning, individual cases or examples lead to a general conclusion. Inductive reasoning is used both to generalize from observations and to identify the cause of a set of phenomenon. Suppose, for example, that after taking a training seminar with "Write Well, International," participants reduce the amount of time it takes them to write memos. That observation might lead you to hypothesize that taking a "Write Well" seminar increases writing efficiency. One example of this would not necessarily validate the conclusion, but if the same phenomenon occurred four, five or a dozen times, the conclusion would be strengthened. Inductive reasoning, then, only leads to the probability of a conclusion. Every possible instance would have to be examined if the conclusion were to be judged valid beyond any doubt. Obviously, the larger the sample, the more confident the writer/speaker can be that the conclusion is correct. 2

3 Deductive reasoning: Deductive reasoning moves from the general principle to the specific case. For example, you could draw the following conclusion by reasoning deductively: Major Premise: Staff members who have participated in the Write Well, International" seminar write more efficiently. Minor Premise: Sam Jones is a seminar participant. Conclusion: Sam Jones will write more efficiently. Together, the above three sentences constitute a syllogism, the classic pattern used in deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning leads to the inevitability of a conclusion, assuming that the major premise and the minor premise are true. However, using deductive reasoning can be tricky since in reality we can examine only a few instances in any given situation, and, therefore, it is usually difficult to make a generalization that applies to all cases. Ways to Evaluate an Argument In evaluating an argument, you need to test both the data and the warrants. When looking at the data, ask: What is the source? Is this a fact, or an inference or opinion masquerading as a fact? Is the evidence accurate? Is it current? Is it relevant to the argument at hand? Have the statistics been evaluated properly? Is the authority cited really an authority on the subject? Is the evidence biased in anyway? Is there enough of it? The following questions should be asked in order to test the reasoning process: Inductive: Are enough examples cited to produce a valid conclusion? Are the instances typical? Are negative instances accounted for? If you are attempting to identify the cause of a phenomenon through the use of inductive reasoning, ask if the data alone is sufficient to bring about the effect, or if some other circumstances or events are the cause. Deductive: Are the major and minor premises true? Is the conclusion based on the premises? Common Reasoning Fallacies If you examine many arguments closely, you will often find that their authors have used techniques which make those arguments shaky and thus their conclusions weak. The following are some examples of the errors in reasoning that can produce faulty arguments: Evading the issue occurs when the real argument is ignored, and something that is irrelevant to the main argument is attacked instead. 3

4 An ad hominem argument attacks the person making the argument rather than the issues involved. A non sequitur results when the evidence does not justify the conclusion. A circular argument occurs when a debatable point is advanced as true. (This is also called begging the question.) A false dilemma sets up the premise that there are only two alternatives when, in fact, several may exist. The error of post hoc, ergo propter hoc ("after this, therefore, because of this ) occurs when the case is made that one thing causes something else when, in reality, the fact that one thing followed another is simply a coincidence. A hasty generalization results when too little evidence is offered or the evidence is not representative. A false analogy is produced when things are alike in some ways but are dissimilar in more fundamental ways, making a valid comparison impossible. (Note: the use of analogy, in which two different things are compared, can be a useful tool in argumentation. As implied above, however, you need to be careful that the dissimilarities between the two things being compared don't negate the validity of the comparison.) Emotional Appeals Emotional appeals can be a powerful means of persuasion. If you study examples of propaganda, for instance, you will see that propagandists make liberal use of emotional appeals. Common techniques used by communicators who want their audience to respond emotionally rather than critically include: making a connection to an authority figure (notice how American politicians love to refer to Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy); calling for people to support an idea or course of action because everyone else is doing it (called "band-wagoning"); or using stereotypes (especially if one group of people are labeled as the source of common trouble). Issues that you deal with may have an emotional side to them, and it might be quite proper to identify that emotional component. ("The west wing of the factory should not be razed because it housed the earliest experiments in widget production, and thus is an important part of our company history.") But you have a responsibility to combine emotional appeals with concrete pieces of data that are woven together in a logical, rational manner. This will create the strongest argument possible, and one which will be able to withstand an equally well-reasoned critique. 4

### Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident

### Organizing an essay the basics 2. Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3. Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4

Organizing an essay the basics 2 Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3 Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4 Exemplification (one version) 5 Argumentation (shorter version) 6-7 Support Go from

### Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical, Rogerian, and Toulmin Models. Junior AP English

Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical, Rogerian, and Toulmin Models Junior AP English Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning = in traditional Aristotelian logic,

### What Is Circular Reasoning?

What Is Circular Reasoning? Logical fallacies are a type of error in reasoning, errors which may be recognized and corrected by observant thinkers. There are a large number of informal fallacies that are

### Teaching Critical Thinking Skills to English for Academic Purposes Students

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills to English for Academic Purposes Students Agenda 1. What is critical thinking? 2. Critical thinking and culture 3. Critical thinking tasks, Bloom s Taxonomy 4. Structuring

### Developing Critical Thinking Skills with The Colbert Report

Developing Critical Thinking Skills with The Colbert Report Why Teach Critical Thinking with The Colbert Report? A. Young people receive the majority of their information through popular culture. B. Using

### 8 THE TWISTED THINKING OF LOGICAL FALLACIES (CHAPTER 5)

8 THE TWISTED THINKING OF LOGICAL FALLACIES (CHAPTER 5) Overview Statement: To be good critical thinkers, leaders must study logical fallacies, both so they can avoid using them and spot them in others.

### Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke

Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke [Modified Fall 2009] 1. Large class of arguments. Sometimes they get very complex, as in Clarke s argument, but the basic idea is simple. Lets

### Philosophical argument

Michael Lacewing Philosophical argument At the heart of philosophy is philosophical argument. Arguments are different from assertions. Assertions are simply stated; arguments always involve giving reasons.

### HOW TO WRITE A CRITICAL ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. John Hubert School of Health Sciences Dalhousie University

HOW TO WRITE A CRITICAL ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY John Hubert School of Health Sciences Dalhousie University This handout is a compilation of material from a wide variety of sources on the topic of writing a

### Read this syllabus very carefully. If there are any reasons why you cannot comply with what I am requiring, then talk with me about this at once.

LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING PHIL 2020 Maymester Term, 2010 Daily, 9:30-12:15 Peabody Hall, room 105 Text: LOGIC AND RATIONAL THOUGHT by Frank R. Harrison, III Professor: Frank R. Harrison, III Office:

### Inductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7. Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7 Inductive Reasoning We learned that valid deductive thinking begins with at least one universal premise and leads to a conclusion that is believed to be contained in the

### Science and Scientific Reasoning. Critical Thinking

Science and Scientific Reasoning Critical Thinking Some Common Myths About Science Science: What it is and what it is not Science and Technology Science is not the same as technology The goal of science

### CRITICAL THINKING. Induction v Deduction. Enumerative Induction and Inductive Generalization Sample Size Representativeness Mean, Median, Mode,

CRITICAL THINKING INDUCTIVE REASONING LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Induction v Deduction Enumerative Induction and Inductive Generalization Sample Size Representativeness Mean, Median, Mode, Analogical

### CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce

### CRITICAL THINKING REASONS FOR BELIEF AND DOUBT (VAUGHN CH. 4)

CRITICAL THINKING REASONS FOR BELIEF AND DOUBT (VAUGHN CH. 4) LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Claims Without Arguments When Claims Conflict Conflicting Claims Conflict With Your Background Information Experts

### WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW

WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The

### CFSD 21 ST CENTURY SKILL RUBRIC CRITICAL & CREATIVE THINKING

Critical and creative thinking (higher order thinking) refer to a set of cognitive skills or strategies that increases the probability of a desired outcome. In an information- rich society, the quality

### A. Arguments are made up of statements, which can be either true or false. Which of the following are statements?

Critical Thinking University of St Andrews March 2007 Bullet point material is not on the students copies. Feel free to use the material as you see fit, depending on timing, ability, enthusiasm etc. Good

### Completing a Peer Review

Completing a Peer Review University of Guelph, Integrative Biology Undergraduate Curriculum Committee 2011/2012 Completing a Peer Review Based on Writing in the Sciences an online resource provided by

### How does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm?

How does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm? Eli Bjørhusdal After having published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962, Kuhn was much criticised for the use

### Lecture 2: Moral Reasoning & Evaluating Ethical Theories

Lecture 2: Moral Reasoning & Evaluating Ethical Theories I. Introduction In this ethics course, we are going to avoid divine command theory and various appeals to authority and put our trust in critical

### Practical Research. Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Planning and Design. Tenth Edition

Practical Research Planning and Design Tenth Edition Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod 2013, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 The Nature and Tools of Research

### Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials

Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials Version 1.0 May 011 1. Power of a Test. Factors affecting Power 3. Required Sample Size RELATED ISSUES 1. Effect Size. Test Statistics 3. Variation 4. Significance

### Logical Fallacies in Attacks Against the Bible: Eleven Examples

Logical Fallacies in Attacks Against the Bible: Eleven Examples Edwin K. P. Chong Version: August 26, 2003 In this essay, I describe, by way of examples, eleven fallacies of logic and their use in attacking

### Analyzing Research Articles: A Guide for Readers and Writers 1. Sam Mathews, Ph.D. Department of Psychology The University of West Florida

Analyzing Research Articles: A Guide for Readers and Writers 1 Sam Mathews, Ph.D. Department of Psychology The University of West Florida The critical reader of a research report expects the writer to

### PHILOSOPHY Higher First edition published September 2006

PHILOSOPHY Higher First edition published September 2006 National Course Specification COURSE Philosophy (Higher) COURSE CODE C237 12 COURSE STRUCTURE This Course has four mandatory Units which are: DV55

### Same-Sex Marriage: Breeding Ground for Logical Fallacies

1 Same-Sex Marriage: Breeding Ground for Logical Fallacies One cannot offer any disagreement that same-sex marriage has gained a great deal of publicity in the recent years. While the issue played a large

### Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way:

Aquinas Third Way Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way: 1. 2. 3. 4. At least one thing has an efficient cause. Every causal chain must either be circular,

### Philosophy 104. Chapter 8.1 Notes

Philosophy 104 Chapter 8.1 Notes Inductive reasoning - The process of deriving general principles from particular facts or instances. - "induction." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,

### Common Core State Standards Speaking and Listening

Comprehension and Collaboration. Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others ideas and expressing their own clearly

### Informal Fallacies informal fallacies fallacy fallacy of relevance fallacy of presumption Common fallacies of relevance ad hominem

Informal Fallacies Aristotle called humans the rational animal. But this does not mean that we are purely reasoning creatures. Humans possess reasoning capabilities but are likewise governed by emotions

### Chapter 5: Fallacies. 23 February 2015

Chapter 5: Fallacies 23 February 2015 Plan for today Talk a bit more about arguments notice that the function of arguments explains why there are lots of bad arguments Turn to the concept of fallacy and

### Justice and Ethics. Jimmy Rising. October 18, 2002

Justice and Ethics Jimmy Rising October 18, 2002 1 Introduction Utilitarianism is an ethical system. John Stuart Mill s use of Utilitarianism to determine what is just and what is injustice may seem natural,

### Writing learning objectives

Writing learning objectives This material was excerpted and adapted from the following web site: http://www.utexas.edu/academic/diia/assessment/iar/students/plan/objectives/ What is a learning objective?

### Hypothesis testing. c 2014, Jeffrey S. Simonoff 1

Hypothesis testing So far, we ve talked about inference from the point of estimation. We ve tried to answer questions like What is a good estimate for a typical value? or How much variability is there

### Critical analysis. Be more critical! More analysis needed! That s what my tutors say about my essays. I m not really sure what they mean.

Critical analysis Be more critical! More analysis needed! That s what my tutors say about my essays. I m not really sure what they mean. I thought I had written a really good assignment this time. I did

### Arguments and Methodology INTRODUCTION

chapter 1 Arguments and Methodology INTRODUCTION We should accept philosophical views in general, and moral views in particular, on the basis of the arguments offered in their support. It is therefore

### Neutrality s Much Needed Place In Dewey s Two-Part Criterion For Democratic Education

Neutrality s Much Needed Place In Dewey s Two-Part Criterion For Democratic Education Taylor Wisneski, Kansas State University Abstract This paper examines methods provided by both John Dewey and Amy Gutmann.

### Goals AND Objectives should be student-centered rather than course-centered Goals AND Objectives should reflect successful student performance

Tips for Writing Goals AND Objectives Goals AND Objectives should be student-centered rather than course-centered Goals AND Objectives should reflect successful student performance Tips for Writing Course

### The College Standard

The College Standard Writing College Papers: Identifying Standards and Critical Thinking Challenges Building Blocks Grammar Vocabulary Questions The Goals of Academic Writing Thesis Argument Research Plagiarism

### Full details of the course syllabus, support and examination arrangements are provided below.

A Level Studies in conjunction with Oxford College Study House is pleased to be able to offer students the opportunity to study A levels through our partner Oxford College who will provide study materials

### Logic and Reasoning Practice Final Exam Spring 2015. Section Number

Logic and Reasoning Practice Final Exam Spring 2015 Name Section Number The final examination is worth 100 points. 1. (5 points) What is an argument? Explain what is meant when one says that logic is the

### INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC A. Basic Concepts 1. Logic is the science of the correctness or incorrectness of reasoning, or the study of the evaluation of arguments. 2. A statement is a declarative sentence,

### HUMN-218 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING. Jill R. Wood Instructor

Coffeyville Community College HUMN-218 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING Jill R. Wood Instructor COURSE NUMBER: HUMN-218 COURSE TITLE: Logic and Critical Thinking CREDIT HOURS: 3 INSTRUCTOR:

### DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE REASONING Expectations 1. Take notes on inductive and deductive reasoning. 2. This is an information based presentation -- I simply want you to be able to apply this information to

### 9-12 Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Goal A: [Student] will develop inquiry skills (identification and

9-12 Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Goal A: [Student] will develop inquiry skills (identification and evaluation of evidence, use of analysis and synthesis to guide decision making and communicate clearly

### Writing = A Dialogue. Part I. They Say

Writing = A Dialogue You come late. When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is

### They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing

They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein ENTERING THE CONVERSATION Many Americans assume that Others more complicated: On the one hand,. On the other

### Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian inference. Class 20, 18.05, Spring 2014 Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom

Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian inference. Class 20, 18.05, Spring 2014 Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom 1 Learning Goals 1. Be able to explain the difference between the p-value and a posterior

### One natural response would be to cite evidence of past mornings, and give something like the following argument:

Hume on induction Suppose you were asked to give your reasons for believing that the sun will come up tomorrow, in the form of an argument for the claim that the sun will come up tomorrow. One natural

### How To Write A Winning Brief: The Elements Of Written Advocacy

How To Write A Winning Brief: The Elements Of Written Advocacy By David J. Perlman Almost every major case, at one time or another, hinges on a brief. A case will be won or lost on preliminary objections

### Department Self-Assessment Department of Philosophy 2009

Department Self-Assessment Department of Philosophy 2009 Preface Our department has gone through several staffing transitions since our last assessment in 2005. Dr. McHugh was on maternity leave Fall of

### PUBLIC HEALTH OPTOMETRY ECONOMICS. Kevin D. Frick, PhD

Chapter Overview PUBLIC HEALTH OPTOMETRY ECONOMICS Kevin D. Frick, PhD This chapter on public health optometry economics describes the positive and normative uses of economic science. The terms positive

### Section 11. Giving and Receiving Feedback

Section 11 Giving and Receiving Feedback Introduction This section is about describing what is meant by feedback and will focus on situations where you will be given, and where you will give, feedback.

### KOREAN WAR PROPAGANDA

KOREAN WAR PROPAGANDA GRADES: 9-12 AUTHOR: Melony Sanford SUBJECT: World History TIME REQUIRED: One class period OBJECTIVES: 1. Students will define propaganda. 2. Students will learn to distinguish between

### Claims of Fact, Value, and Policy. A multidisciplinary approach to informal argumentation

Claims of Fact, Value, and Policy A multidisciplinary approach to informal argumentation Claims of Fact A claim of fact posits whether something is true or untrue, but there must always be the potential

### P1. All of the students will understand validity P2. You are one of the students -------------------- C. You will understand validity

Validity Philosophy 130 O Rourke I. The Data A. Here are examples of arguments that are valid: P1. If I am in my office, my lights are on P2. I am in my office C. My lights are on P1. He is either in class

### Types of Error in Surveys

2 Types of Error in Surveys Surveys are designed to produce statistics about a target population. The process by which this is done rests on inferring the characteristics of the target population from

### Statistical tests for SPSS

Statistical tests for SPSS Paolo Coletti A.Y. 2010/11 Free University of Bolzano Bozen Premise This book is a very quick, rough and fast description of statistical tests and their usage. It is explicitly

### Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes Theorem Class 3, 18.05, Spring 2014 Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom

Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes Theorem Class 3, 18.05, Spring 2014 Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom 1 Learning Goals 1. Know the definitions of conditional probability and independence

### A Few Basics of Probability

A Few Basics of Probability Philosophy 57 Spring, 2004 1 Introduction This handout distinguishes between inductive and deductive logic, and then introduces probability, a concept essential to the study

### Program Level Learning Outcomes for the Department of Philosophy Page 1

Page 1 PHILOSOPHY General Major I. Depth and Breadth of Knowledge. A. Will be able to recall what a worldview is and recognize that we all possess one. B. Should recognize that philosophy is most broadly

### EFFECTIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING IN MODERN INFORMATION AGE ORGANIZATIONS

EFFECTIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING IN MODERN INFORMATION AGE ORGANIZATIONS Cezar Vasilescu and Aura Codreanu Abstract: The field of strategic management has offered a variety of frameworks and concepts during

### Philosophy 145, Critical Thinking

Philosophy 145, Critical Thinking Professor Nicholas Ray E-mail: nmray@uwaterloo.ca Lecture: Tuesdays, 7:00-9:50 (HH 1104) Office: HH 326 Office Hours: Thursdays, 10:00 12:00 DESCRIPTION Whether we are

### 3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

### specification AS/A Level GCE GCE Critical Thinking version 3 September 2013

AS/A Level GCE GCE Critical Thinking OCR Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Critical Thinking H052 OCR Advanced GCE in Critical Thinking H452 version 3 September 2013 specification v3 QAN 500/2305/6 QAN 500/2192/8

### Writing an Argument. The Writer:

Writing an Argument The purpose of argument writing is to present a position and to have an audience adopt or at least seriously consider your argument. The Writer: Perhaps more than any other kind of

### ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)

ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) General Observations on The Transcendental Aesthetic To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain, as clearly as possible,

### or conventional implicature [1]. If the implication is only pragmatic, explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency.

44 ANALYSIS explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency. Let C1 and C2 be distinct moral codes formulated in English. Let C1 contain a norm N and C2 its negation. The moral

### 1.2 Forms and Validity

1.2 Forms and Validity Deductive Logic is the study of methods for determining whether or not an argument is valid. In this section we identify some famous valid argument forms. Argument Forms Consider

### Essay Writing Grade 8 Model

A guide for: Essay Writing Grade 8 Model How can I effectively utilize my research? Version 1.0 2001 c. Copyright MS, J.S Opening Quote (The Tone) Introduction (The Context) 1. 2. 3. The Transition: 4.

### 1/9. Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas

1/9 Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas This week we are going to begin looking at a new area by turning our attention to the work of John Locke, who is probably the most famous English philosopher of all

### Writing Essays. SAS 25 W11 Karen Kostan, Margaret Swisher

Writing Essays A GOOD ESSAY CONTAINS: 1. An introductory paragraph 2. A clear thesis statement 3. A body consisting of supporting paragraphs 4. A concluding paragraph Step 1: Review Assignment Read the

### Critical thinking II: Authority and dissent, and the written word. MMUBS MRes. (slides available at cfpm.org/mres)

Critical thinking II: Authority and dissent, and the written word MMUBS MRes (slides available at cfpm.org/mres) The fundamental problem One does not have sufficient time to develop/check/verify all knowledge

### In an article titled Ethical Absolutism and the

Stance Volume 3 April 2010 A Substantive Revision to Firth's Ideal Observer Theory ABSTRACT: This paper examines Ideal Observer Theory and uses criticisms of it to lay the foundation for a revised theory

### PHILOSOPHY 101: CRITICAL THINKING

PHILOSOPHY 101: CRITICAL THINKING [days and times] [classroom] [semester] 20YY, [campus] [instructor s name] [office hours: days and times] [instructor s e-mail] COURSE OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES 1. Identify

### Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University. A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15

Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 Professor Jay M. Harris

### Private Medicine and Government Health Service in Bahrain

1 Bahrain Medical Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 2, June 2003 Editorial Private Medicine and Government Health Service in Bahrain Jaffar M Al Bareeq* The debate of regulating the private medicine practiced by

### Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

### Does rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp. 349 74.

Does rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp. 349 74. 1. Rationality and responding to reasons Some philosophers think that rationality

### Test 1: Inference. Directions

Test 1: Inference An inference is a conclusion a person can draw from certain observed or supposed facts. For example, if the lights are on in a house and voices can be heard coming from the house, a person

### Intending, Intention, Intent, Intentional Action, and Acting Intentionally: Comments on Knobe and Burra

Intending, Intention, Intent, Intentional Action, and Acting Intentionally: Comments on Knobe and Burra Gilbert Harman Department of Philosophy Princeton University November 30, 2005 It is tempting to

READING SCHOLARLY ARTICLES Adapted from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~rudged/dir614.html and http://homepages.wmich.edu/~rudged/dis614.html with permission of the author (David Rudge), accessed 6/20/12.

### Last May, philosopher Thomas Nagel reviewed a book by Michael Sandel titled

Fourth Quarter, 2006 Vol. 29, No. 4 Editor s Watch Sandel and Nagel on Abortion Last May, philosopher Thomas Nagel reviewed a book by Michael Sandel titled Public Philosophy in The New York Review of Books.

### Building a Better Argument

Building a Better Argument Summary Whether it s an ad for burger chains, the closing scene of a Law & Order spinoff, a discussion with the parents about your social life or a coach disputing a close call,

### How to Sell Professional Services

How to Sell Professional Services By Tony Reiss As the markets for professional services became de-regulated and as partnerships competed more aggressively with each other to win new clients, firms started

### DEVELOPING HYPOTHESIS AND

Shalini Prasad Ajith Rao Eeshoo Rehani DEVELOPING 500 METHODS SEPTEMBER 18 TH 2001 DEVELOPING HYPOTHESIS AND Introduction Processes involved before formulating the hypotheses. Definition Nature of Hypothesis

### PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16

PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16 In order to make an argument, you have to make a claim (the conclusion) and you have to give some evidence for the claim (the premises). Bush tried to justify the war

### What is a fallacy? Fallacies of Relevance Defective Induction Fallacies of Presumption Ambiguity Summary. Logic 2: Fallacies Jan.

Logic 2: Fallacies Jan. 17, 2014 Overview I What is a fallacy? Definition Formal and Informal Fallacies Fallacies of Relevance Appeal to Emotion Appeal to Pity Appeal to Force Argument Against the Person

### Publishing papers in international journals

Publishing papers in international journals I B Ferguson The Horticulture & Food Research Institute of New Zealand Private Bag 92169 Auckland New Zealand iferguson@hortresearch.co.nz 1. Introduction There

### Practical Jealousy Management

Florida Poly Retreat 2006 Practical Jealousy Management Part 1: On the Nature of Jealousy Jealousy is an unusual emotion in that it is an emotion rooted in other emotions. Often, the root of jealousy lies

### Analyzing Marketing Cases

Analyzing Marketing Cases What is a case? A case is a verbal snapshot of the whole or some part of an organization. The cases are all based upon problems and events that actually took place, although in

### CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS FOR OKLAHOMA EDUCATORS (CEOE )

CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS FOR OKLAHOMA EDUCATORS (CEOE ) FIELD 74: OKLAHOMA GENERAL EDUCATION TEST (OGET ) Subarea Range of Competencies I. Critical Thinking Skills: Reading and Communications 01 05 II.

### The Art of Persuasive Writing

The Art of Persuasive Writing Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements Editorials Speeches Propaganda Reviews Blogs Persuasive Essays Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements try to convince you to

### Essay-writing in the exam context

Essay-writing in the exam context What constitutes a good essay in the exam context? Is it ok to answer exam questions on topics covered in coursework essays? Do the criteria for judging a good essay differ

### The Discussion Paper. Conceptual Framework of Financial Accounting

The Discussion Paper Conceptual Framework of Financial Accounting Accounting Standards Board of Japan December 2006 (Tentative translation: 16 Mar. 2007) Contents Preface 1 Chapter 1 Objectives of Financial