Finnish Experiences of the EAFRD and Programme Based Rural Development Reykjavik

Transcription

1 Finnish Experiences of the EAFRD and Programme Based Rural Development Reykjavik Ministerial Adviser Sirpa Karjalainen MAF, Finland 1

2 case Finland Preparation of the programme for strategy and programme Management Financing Schedules Measures Leader -approach Technical assistance 2

3 Rural Development regulations Council Reg / rural development Comm. Reg / programming and implementation Council Reg / financing, EARDF, payments, agency Comm. Reg. 855 / paying agency Comm. Reg.1975 / control 3

4 Preparation of the nat. strategy analysis, research, policy defining, co-operation between ministries, strategic working group in the MAF involving other ministries, stakeholders, NGO:s, research etc. several official and non-official working groups in the ministry 15 regional and 58 local strategies and plans by regional administration and local action groups involving stakeholders and thousands of rural people Seminars, hearings etc. draft version in MAF s website Main emphasis on provision of information 4

5 Actors and organisations Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Agriculture (MA) Central admin. Rural Network Unit (in Seinäjoki) Agency for Rural Affairs (MA, PA) (in Seinäjoki) Regional level ELY-Centers (MA, PA) Regional Council Local level Other actors in regional/local level Local Action Groups (55) (MA) Municipalities 5

6 Management of programme The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry acts as managing authority and is responsible for the planning of the rural development programme and any changes in it. The Ministry also makes Rural strategy and other political quidelines. The Ministry prepares national legislation and allocation of the funding to the regions and LAGs. The ministry selects the independent certification body trough a tendering procedure. The Finnish Agency for Rural Affairs is the national authority responsible for the administration of the rural funding. The Agency is the payment authority and it has also delegated managing authority duties. The Agency compiles application forms and instructions and is responsible for the paying and the supervision of the funds granted. The Agency gives administrative training. The Agency makes the guidance, check lists, application and payment forms. 6 Sivu

7 Management of programme Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (ELY centres) provide funds for business aids and projects and they also grant the payments for special agrienvironment measures. The centres make all the final project approval and payment decisions in the Leader-projects and Leader business aids. The ELY centres make legal checks. The ELY centres have delegated managing and paying authority duties. The ELY centres make on the spot checks. The Rural Network provides links between rural developers. The Rural Network Unit provides services for the LAGs and assists them, for example, in finding international partners. The network organizes training relating to the good practices and also training to the LAGs for example the Leader- association board members. 7 Sivu

8 Management of programme The municipalities fund Leader activities (20% of public funding) and grant agri-environment payments. The LAGs make for their area local rural strategy / plan, provide funding for enterprises and development projects that are in line with the local strategy. The registered associations are eligible to apply for support for special agri-environment measures. The LAG board makes statement / feasibility study approval of all actions. All the applications and payment applications are send to the LAGs. The LAGs also make training, advising and information actions. 8

9 Financing of the programme Mainland Finland (both EU and national funds) - Axis meur (co financing: 45 %) - Axis meur ( 28 %) - Axis meur ( 45 %) - Axis meur ( 45 %) - Technical aid 40 meur (45 %) Total meur ( 31 % ) All is included in the state budget. Municipalities share of the national public financing is 5-10 % 9

10 Schedules - Analysing and planning started in Spring-Summer > Preparation of national legislation (laws, regulations) - In May-June 2006 the draft programme was circulated widely among the stakeholders (also on MAF s website) - The programme was finalised and submitted to the Government for approval in July 2006 and submitted after that to the Commission - The programme got it s approval Regional and national coordination with ERDF and ESF programmes (on going) 10

11 Measures (1/6) Training and information in agriculture and forestry - rapid structural change, management, agri-env. measures, new requirements - coordination with ESF human resources / training / welfare actions Agricultural investments & young farmers aid modernisation, on farm bio-energy investments Processing and marketing (annex I, wood and bioenergy products) - modernisation of small and medium sized annex I processing, new energy resources Innovative co-operations in these activities - networking of farmers, industry and research institutes - cluster projects, feasibility studies, pilots, 11

12 Measures (2/6) Nationally funded, outside programme: - Agriculture and forestry advisory services - Early retirement sheme - Main part of farm investment aid, top-ups - Management of forest, forest investments and infrastructure (national programmes) - Food quality schemes; national programme, based on TQM. - Producer groups (not much interest in finland) 12

13 Measures: Reasoning behind LFA(3/5) Geographical location is the greatest limiting factor Growing period days Temperature sum Cdays - Germany Cdays - Spain Cdays Natural conditions reflected in yield levels only half of the yield levels in Central Europe 13

14

15 Measures (3/6) Agri-environmental support - main emphasis is to reduce nutrient load from agriculture in the watercourse and enhace the biodiversity, wide participation of farmers - emphasis on regional targeting, new submeasures as nutrient balance, nature management fields - possible to choose more additional submeasures - new: Leader approach (local NGOs take care of a project) All measures must be detailed, measurable, controllable DG ENV is also a partner in the discussions Solid research base is a must. 15

16 Measures (4/6) - natural handicap payments (LFA) - agri-environment payments incl. Natura 2000 for UAA - animal welfare - non-productive investments on farms: - multifunctional wetlands, valuable traditional biotopes etc. Nationally funded, outside mainland programme - forest environment incl. support for private Natura 2000 forest areas 16

17 17 Rural Development Rural Areas Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Joensuu Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Imatra Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Lappeenranta Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Savonlinna Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Varkaus Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Kotka Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Mikkeli Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kouvola Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Kuusankoski Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Porvoo Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Vantaa Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Lahti Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Järvenpää Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Helsinki Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kuopio Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Kajaani Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Iisalmi Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Oulu Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Rovaniemi Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Äänekoski Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Kemi Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Raahe Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Tornio Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Kokkola Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Seinäjoki Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Pietarsaari Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Vaasa Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jämsä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Kauniainen Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Valkeakoski Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Hämeenlinna Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Espoo Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Riihimäki Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Tampere Salo Salo Salo Salo Salo Salo Salo Salo Salo Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Kerava Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Lohja Turku Turku Turku Turku Turku Turku Turku Turku Turku Pori Pori Pori Pori Pori Pori Pori Pori Pori Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Rauma Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Uusikaupunki Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina Maarianhamina kilometriä Kajaanin yliopistokeskus, Oulun yliopisto Suomen Aluetutkimus FAR Maaseututyypit 2006 Kaupunki (58) Kaupunkien läh. maaseutu (89) Ydinmaaseutu (142) Harvaan asuttu maaseutu (143) Maakuntaraja Kuntaraja Red: Cities Yellow: Rural-Urban area Green: Core Rural Area Blue: Sparsely Populated Rural Area

18 18

19 19

20 Measures (5/6) Rural Economy Diversification of rural entrepreneurship both on farm and rural micro-enterprises Aim: better rural employment and income building Regionalised - development of rural / nature / fishing tourism - service sector is developing fast - decision making - selection criterias and priorities for the programming period according the regional strategy - coordination and co-operation between the funds 20

21 Measures (6/6) Rural Economy - Most of rural areas are sparsely populated and the population is ageing > Equal possibilities in information society > Active and competent citizens, Local programmes and commitment is important Infrastructure and village development Cultural and natural heritage Training, knowledge and communication Coordination with ERDF, ESF 21

22 LEADER-approach and groups 1. Civic activity has been strengthened as a working method (partnership) 2. Taking responsibility of development will grow when citizens are trusted (free, uncompelled action) 3. The size of Leader action group's area (subregion) is suitable 4. Leader connects citizens, associations and municipalities to work together (joint responsibility) 5. Leader has been mainstreamed as geographic 6. Action is diversed and the funding responses to needs 22

23 LEADER-approach and groups 7. Leader is cost-effective development work 8. Development of the Leader-method is going on nonstop (new development project is started) 9. Workers in the LAG's are skilfull and good at their work and that ensures profitability of the action 10. Good results of projects cause positive consequences 11. Internationality increases and that has positive influence 12. People has started to trust on the permanence of Leader 13. Also implementing the "fisheries areas" with EFF 23

24 Technical assistance Important and usefull: information, reports and studies Monitoring committee data system for monitoring and reporting training of management and recipients boosting of the projects selection of financed projects evaluations (ex ante and on going) controlling national rural network!! 24

25 more information: rural.fi Internet website for the programme was opened on 1 May 2007 at Website maintained and updated by the Rural Network Unit. Soon available also in english: 25

26 Thank you for your interest! 26