WHAT TURKEY EXPECTED AND FOUND FROM THE CUSTOMS UNION IN THE TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY

Transcription

1 International Journal of Business and Management Studies, CD-ROM. ISSN: :: 05(01): (2016) WHAT TURKEY EPECTED AND FOUND FROM THE CUSTOMS UNION IN THE TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY smet Ate and Orhan anl Adnan Menderes University, Turkey Customs union is a kind of integration that creates both static and dynamic effects for the economies. In Integration Theory, static and dynamic effects don t guarantee positive results for each country because of the country s economic size, production potential, geographical location, neighbors and other reasons. In this study, the effects of the Customs Union between Turkey and The European Union on Turkey s foreign trade in the last 20 years were studied. After The Customs Union period for Turkey and EU, Turkey s exports and imports amounts to EU has increased. But the shares of exports and imports of Turkey to The EU decreased fifty percent in the last ten years. The EU s shares of exports and imports to Turkey in all of its trade have increased. Turkey has kept its growth rate in exports and imports to countries except the European Union. Keywords: Customs Union, Turkey-EU Trade, Effects of Customs Union. Introduction This study searches the effects of The Customs Union Agreement signed in 1995 on Turkey's economy and foreign trade in the twentieth anniversary. First, an overview is taken on EU-Turkey historical process of The Customs Union, then the effects of the Customs Union is analyzed. In July 1959, shortly after the creation of the European Economic Community in 1958, Turkey made its first application to join. The EEC's response to Turkey's application in 1959 was to suggest the establishment of an association until Turkey's circumstances permitted its accession ( ). The way of the success of the accession process are bound to come to a certain level of the national economy. In the first process, this path of the Customs Union is drawn. The ensuing negotiations resulted in the signature of the Agreement Creating An Association Between The Republic of Turkey and the European Economic Community (the "Ankara Agreement") on 12 September This agreement, which entered into force on 1 December 1964, aimed at securing Turkey's full membership in the EEC through the establishment in three phases of a the Customs Union which would serve as an instrument to bring about integration between the EEC and Turkey ( ). The Customs Union has been foreseen in three stages, the preparation period, the transitional period and the Customs Union. The European Union membership application started in 1959 and the first step of the preparatory period for The Customs Union has officially started in 1963 with Ankara Agreement. On April 23, 1970, the preparatory phase has ended with the signing of the Additional Protocol and transition phase of the Customs Union began. The Customs Union 22 years long membership process ended on 6th March

2 118 What Turkey Expected and Found from the Customs Union in the... with the decision of Turkey-EU Partnership Council. The Customs Union Agreement is signed in 1 January 1995 and put into force one year later. Literature Review Major studies in the literature in this area are as follows. In the study called, Changes in Turkey's Import Function Coefficients After The Customs Union covering the years Cengiz Aktas and Didem Guven used the technique of In Case of Increase in Observation Number the Coefficient of Determination Regression Testing. As a result, The Customs Union has led to major changes in Turkey's import function coefficients. Do an Seyhun and Semanur Soyyi it Kaya s study , aimed to clarify Country and Chapter -Based Changes in Turkey's foreign trade after the Customs Union. They used concentration ratio (CR) and Herfindahl Index (HI). As a result, according to the country classification, covering both imports and exports in the first four ranks countries did not change the rate of CR4; according the product classification, exports were switched from low-cost technology group to medium high-tech group of goods; imports, medium and high-tech group of goods was found to decrease the share capital entered in these chapters. Therefore, a structural change was observed in the exports to the European Union. A structural change towards the reduction of import dependence of the European Union could not be found. Dilek Temiz s study focused on If the Customs Union whether made an impact on Turkey s export or not by monthly data covering the years ADF and Phillips Pherron and Unit Root Test and Least Squares Method are used in the study. Result: an increase in the volume of foreign trade occurred but it concluded a fall in net exports. The studies on this issue are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. The studies in literature on Integration Theory, the Customs Union, and the Customs Union Effects Autor-s Integration Theory The Customs Union Effects of Customs Union Arzu Y lmaz(2012) Dilek Seymen(2009) Fatma Karaman and Lerzan Özkale O uzhan Türker(2009) Seyhun Do an and Semanur Kaya(2011) Belgin Akçay(2008) Dilek Temiz(2009) Ela Çolpan Nart(2009) Ertu rul Y ld r m and Cihan Durma(2007) Hamza Çe tepe and Tuba M staco lu(2012) Levent Gokdemir and Elif Karaman(2008) Mehmet entürk(2014) Orhan Gündüz and Kemal Esengül(2007)

3 İsmet Ateş and Orhan Şanlı 119 Tobb(2011) T.C. Avrupa Birli i Bakanl (2014 Cemalettin Kalayc and Seyfettin Artan(2009) Elif Hobiko lu(2007) Etem Karakaya and Ferhat Baskan Mustafa Hatipler(2012) Özge Korkankorkmaz(2007) Tusiad(2014) Alaattin K z ltan,mustafa Ersungur and Özgür Polat Cengiz Akta and Didem Güven Ekrem Akçay,Çi dem Ergun and Elvettin Akman(2011) World Bank(2014) Ka an Bahçekap l (2006) Orçun Kececi(2012) Atilla Sand kl and Erdem Kaya Elif Uzgöre(2012) Hüseyin Kutay Aytu (2008) Nilüfer Karacasulu(2007) Seçil Öraz(2011) Selçuk Emsen and Ça atay Karaköy(2009) Bahar anl (2008) Hasan Mor(2010) Merve rem Yap c (2007) Sefer Yavuz(2013) Sinem Akgül Aç kme e(2004) The Effects of Customs Union on Turkey s Trade The period of this study includes pre-ten years and post-twenty years from the Customs Union. In some case, different periods is used because of data limitation. The Customs Union agreement between Turkey an EU has started on 1 January To understand the effects of CU, before the CU and after the CU periods are compared. It is expected that some static and dynamic effects of CU should be seen on this study according to the Customs Union Theory. First, foreign trade data between Turkey and EU from 1981 to 2015 is shown on the Chart 1.

4 120 What Turkey Expected and Found from the Customs Union in the Million USD Years Export Import Net Export For Turkey Net Export for EU Chart 1. Foreign Trade Between Turkey and EU Source: (The chart is drawn by authors.) According to the Chart 1, both export and import of Turkey to EU are continuously rising. In some years like 2001 and 2009 there are some sudden and strong decreases in foreign trade. There was a domestic political crisis in 2001 in Turkey and there was a global crisis in the world in 2009, so that is why these decreases happened. All the period long turkey has a foreign trade deficits and EU has a surplus. But both exports and imports quantities are increasing. Mentioning all the periods, best foreign deficit performance years for Turkey are crisis years because of the over valuated foreign currency Export Growth Rate Import Growth Rate Chart 2. Turkey's Annual Growth in Export and Import to EU (%)

5 İsmet Ateş and Orhan Şanlı 121 The year 1996 is a milestone for Turkey because CU has started. To understand the effects of CU, pre and post periods of CU should be compared in terms of exports and imports. To do so first, annual export and import growth rate in percentage are calculated by us and then compared. The results of comparisons are shown on Chart 2. According to the Chart 2, it is hard to tell definite results because the values are so indifference and not stable. It can be said that Turkey s annual import growth rate reached up to 50% in the period and same can be said for export up to 40%. Before CU the indifference in export and import growth rates by years were more dramatic but after the CU more stable. To understand better, the effects of CU pre and post periods average growth in export and import rate were calculated by us. In Chart 3 the average growth rates in export and import calculated for pre and post period of CU are shown ,39 14, AVERAGE of PERIOD ,23 8, BEFORE CU AFTER CU Export Growth to EU Import Growth from EU Chart 3. Turkey's Trade With EU: Before & After There are some dramatic results in Chart 3. In contrast theory, both exports and imports annual growth rates decreased after the period in about 50 percent. According to trade-creating and tradediverting effects in the Customs Union Theory, it is normally expected a rise in export and-or import after The Customs Union. But this fact may not be seen valid for Turkey. If the same comparison is made for all the world some different results can be seen in Chart 4. In contrast to Chart 3, Chart 4 shows different results for EU and the World. While the average growth in exports and imports from Turkey to EU is decreasing trough the pre and post periods about 50 percent, it is revealing without change for all the world. While this decrease happening, Turkey keeps the same average growth in export and import rates for pre-post periods to all world about 12%. This makes the situation more dramatic than the results shown in chart 3. It can be said that the CU may effect the Turkey s trade in a different way.

6 122 What Turkey Expected and Found from the Customs Union in the ,39 14,36 14 AVERAGE of PERIOD ,06 11,97 8,23 8,38 11,77 12, BEFORE CU AFTER CU Export Growth to EU Import Growth from EU Export Growth to WORLD Import Growth from World Chart 4. Turkey's Trade With EU and World: Before & After It is not enough to find out some conclusion for the effects of CU. It is better to look on Turkeys trade shares with EU and the other countries. 70,0 60,0 56,5 56,3 56,6 59,5 56,9 55,1 50,0 49,5 48,3 51,8 51,7 51,7 46,2 46,5 46,4 SHARE (%) 40,0 30,0 39,4 40,2 40,6 39,0 41,5 43,5 20,0 10,0 0, European Union (EU 28) Log. (European Union (EU 28)) Other countries Log. (Other countries) Chart 5. Turkey's Export Share by EU and Other Countries

7 İsmet Ateş and Orhan Şanlı 123 It is clear that the year 2008 (global mortgage crisis year) is a breaking point for Turkey s foreign trade. The EU had always been the biggest partner in foreign trade for Turkey. More than fifty percent of Turkey's exports were to the European Union until The European Union was always Turkey s the biggest trading partner until that date. The data and the logarithmic trend curves in the Chart 5 show that the situation has changed. The countries out of The EU is now the biggest trading partner of Turkey. 70,0 60,0 54,1 56,7 59,0 62,4 59,1 60,5 61,6 62,5 62,8 62,8 50,0 SHARE (%) 40,0 30,0 45,2 42,6 40,3 36,9 40,2 39,0 38,0 37,1 36,7 36,7 20,0 10,0 0, European Union (EU 28) Log. (European Union (EU 28)) Other countries Log. (Other countries) Chart 6. Turkey's Import Share by EU and Other Countries Like chart 5, chart 6 also shows similar situation for imports of Turkey. Turkey is making a bigger and bigger section of increasing imports from countries outside the European Union. Initially, in 2005, the difference between EU and other countries share in Turkey s imports of up to ten percent, reached twenty-six percent in In chart 7, unlike Turkey, The EU s exports and imports share to Tukey in its total exports and imports are increasing. Increases in exports share of EU to Turkey approximately 1 per cent and 0,6 per cent for imports in last ten years. The situation in Chart 7 can be considered as an advantage for The EU but it may not be valid. It is clear that The EU is getting more focus on Turkey and its dependence on Turkey in foreign trade is getting stronger. While the EU concentration in the trade to Turkey is getting higher, Turkey s is getting lower. As Turkey s concentration in trade is rising for countries out of The EU, Turkey has diversified its trade.

8 124 What Turkey Expected and Found from the Customs Union in the... 3,5 3,0 3,1 3,3 3,2 3,2 3,0 2,5 2,6 2,4 2,8 2,8 2,8 2,8 2,8 2,7 SHARE (% ) 2,0 1,5 2,1 1,6 1,4 1,7 2,0 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,2 2,1 2,1 2,0 2,1 2,0 2,0 1,9 2,1 2,2 1,0 0,5 0, Years EU Turkey Share of Imports EU Turkey Share of Exports Log. (EU Turkey Share of Imports) Log. (EU Turkey Share of Exports) Chart 7. The EU s Export and Import Share by Turkey Source: (The results are calculated by authors.) Conclusion Customs union is a kind of integration that creates both static and dynamic effects for the economies. In Integration Theory, static and dynamic effects don t guarantee positive results for each country because of the country s economic size, production potential, geographical location, neighbors and other reasons. Even if the Customs Unions don t guarantee the positive results for the countries involving this kind of integration, it is expected for partner countries to experience a slight increase in their trade share towards union. Although European Union Countries were also Turkey s major partners in international trade before the Customs Union, this trade relationship has changed in different ways after the Customs Union Agreement. In this context, Turkey s exports and imports amount to EU continued to increase after CU. But the shares of exports and imports of Turkey to The EU decreased fifty percent in last ten years. The EU s shares of exports and imports to Turkey in its all trade has increased. It is evaluated that theoretical effects of CU were realized for the EU but not for Turkey in last ten years. It can be considered a weakness for Turkey but it could not be a proper evaluation. Turkey increased its exports and imports to The EU in terms of amount and kept its annual growth rate over the World average in export to The EU. Turkey has tried hard to find new trade partners in order not to be affected by international fluctuations and not to be dependent on some geographical markets after CU especially in last seven years. It can be considered that Turkey was very successful this way. While Turkey s dependence on foreign trade to the European Union has been decreasing, its dependence on countries outside the European Union has increased in shares. Turkey has found new destinations in international trade. Turkey had great efforts to switch its trade from EU to other countries but it was not only because Turkey s efforts, but global switching from west to east. Turkey kept this wind and now is more independent in international trade. Turkey has lower concentration rate to EU and diversified its trade all over the world.

9 İsmet Ateş and Orhan Şanlı 125 References 1. Akçay, B. (2008). Avrupa Birli inin Ekonomik Kriterleri ve Türkiye. T.C. Strategy Development Department of Ministry of Finance Journal of Finance, Akçay, E.Y., Argun, Ç., Akman, E. (2011). AB nin Tarihsel Geli imi Ve Ortak D Ve Güvenlik Politikas. S.D.Ü. Journal of Visionary, 3(4), Akta, C., Güven, D. (2003). Gümrük Birli i Sonras nda Türkiye nin thalat Fonksiyonu Katsay lar ndaki De i imin ncelenmesi. Dumlup nar University Journal of Social Science, 9, Çe tepe, H., M staço lu, T. (2012). Gümrük Birli inin Do rudan Yabanc Yat r mlara Etkisi: Avrupa Birli inin Yeni Üyeleri ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Marmara University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 32, Do an, N On Y ll k Dönemde Gümrük Birli i nin Etkileri Ve Sonuçlar Üzerine Bir De erlendirme, Mu la Sitki Koçman University Journal of Legislation, Do an, S., Soyyi it Kaya, S. (2011). Gümrük Birli i Sonras nda( ) Türkiye nin Avrupa Birli i le D Ticaretinin Ülke ve Fas l Bazl Yo unla ma Analizi. stanbul University Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, No:14, Gökdemir, L., Karaman, E. (2008). Onuncu Y l nda Gümrük Birli i: Ne Beklendi?, Ne Gerçekle ti?. F rat University Journal of Social Science, 18, Kalayc, C., Artan, S. (2009). Gümrük Birli i nin Türkiye nin D Ticaretine Etkisi. Econanadol International Economics Congress June Nart, E.Ç. (2010). Gümrük Birli i nin Türkiye nin D Ticaretine Etkisi: Panel Veri Analizi. Journal Of Yasar University, 17(5), Seymen, D. (2009). Gümrük Birli i,türkiye nin Avrupa Birli i ile Ticaretinde Ülke Yo unla mas n De i tirdi mi?. Suleyman Demiral University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14, entürk, M. (2014). Gümrük Birli i Üyeli inden Günümüze Türkiye nin D Ticareti Üzerine Bir nceleme, nönü University Journal of Academic Approach, 5(1). 12. Temiz, D. (2009). Gümrük Birli i le Türkiye nin D Ticaretinde Yap sal Bir De i me Oldu mu?. Journal of European Studies in Ankara, 8(1), Y lmaz, A. (2012). AB Gümrük Birli ine Üyeli in Türkiye Ekonomisine Etkileri. Ni de University Institute of Social Sciences Master Thesis T.C. Ministry of the European Union T.C. Ministry of Economy, Establishment of Turkey-EU Partnership Relationship EU-Turkey Relations Eurostat Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Turkey and the European Union TU K- Turkish Statistical Institute.