Symantec Enterprise Vault And NetApp Better Together

Transcription

1 Symantec Enterprise Vault And NetApp Better Together John Martin, Consulting Systems Engineer Information Archival with Symantec and NetApp

2 Today s Customer Headaches Data is growing exponentially Scaling and performance are suffering Managing and finding information is difficult Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 2

3 Market Trends: Data Retention Worldwide Disk Growth (PBs) Worldwide Archive Capacity Current and Projected Up 5%,442 2,557 4,38 7,745 3,484 Is your infrastructure ready for this growth? Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 27 Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 3

4 Why Symantec and NetApp Reduced risk Best-of-breed solution Integration and alignment Tested, delivered, and supported Complete solution Feature-rich application Fast, Reliable, Scalable Storage Data De-Duplication Integrated Data protection Security and Compliance Availability and disaster recovery Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 4

5 CIOs care because Better ROI Fast archiving layer means more aggressive archiving Easier deployment means shorter implementation projects Reliable storage solution means less money spent on troubleshooting more money spent on value add. Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 5

6 IT Managers care because.. Lower TCO More Storage on Fewer Spindles means lower Price Power, Spave and Cooling Dymanic Just in Time Provisioning of Storage means buying tomorrows storage at tomorrows prices SQL Server Index Archive Unified Storage Solution means less money spent on training Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 6

7 IT staff care because.. Better Solutions Faster more reliable archives means less pushback, less time arguing, less time spent in pointless meetings. Easier deployment and operations means more time is spent on the good stuff Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 7

8 I care because Better ROI + Lower TCO + Better Solutions = More Promotions Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 8

9 Simplified Archiving Ease of management Availability and protection Flexibility and Performance Efficient and affordable archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 9

10 Simplified Archiving Ease of management Availability and protection Flexibility and Performance Efficient and affordable archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp

11 Ease of Management Speed implementation, simplify management, and ease expansion Reduce backup/recovery windows Guarantee SLAs on primary servers Enable end-user efficiency Scale tools and resources Provide one box archive approach Offer flexible and simple scalability Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp

12 Storage Considerations Best Better Okay Poor Price Reliability Data Protection Flexibility Performance Optical Tape Primary (FC, iscsi) Secondary (SATA) Enterprise Vault on NetApp Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 2

13 Simplified Architecture Deployment Server Primary Storage Enterprise Vault Servers Content Archive File Shares Secondary (SATA) Archive architecture Database Full text index Content archive Primary Index DB Primary (FC) NetApp Storage Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 3

14 Simplified Archiving Ease of management Availability and protection Flexibility and Performance Efficient and affordable archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 4

15 Archive Availability and Data Protection Lower Risk Advanced disk resilience Synchronized backup and recovery Flexible, integrated disaster recovery Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 5

16 Simplified Data Protection Server Enterprise Vault Servers Archive architecture Database Full text index Content archive Archive Secondary Snapshot Copy of 3 (SATA) Archived Archive Primary Index DB NetApp Storage 4 Snapshot Copy of Primary Primary Snapshot Copy of 2 (FC) Full Text Index Snapshot Copy of DB Primary Index DB Archival DR Copy Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 6

17 Cascading Snapshot and SnapMirror Technology Archiving Running Read/Write Archiving Suspended Read Only Archiving Resumes Read/Write SMSQL-Initiated SQL Databases Indexes Archived Files Snapshot Copy SnapMirror Replication Snapshot Copy SnapMirror Replication Snapshot Copy SnapMirror Replication Replication Continues Replication Continues Replication Continues Less than minute NetApp Storage Advantages Automation Recoverability Application availability Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 7

18 Selecting the Right Level of Protection Best Better Okay Poor Replication Snapshot LAN Clustering Tape Backup Access to Directory Database Corruption of SQL Database Loss of Archive Application Server Loss of Vault Store Partition Disks Corruption of Exchange Database Corruption of Indexes Loss of Data Center Site Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 8

19 Selecting the Right Level of Protection (con t) Best Better Okay Poor NetApp Protection LAN Clustering Tape Backup Access to Directory Database Corruption of SQL Database Loss of Archive Application Server Loss of Vault Store Partition Disks Corruption of Exchange Database Corruption of Indexes Loss of Data Center Site Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 9

20 NetApp RAID-DP: The New Standard for Data Reliability Greater availability with RAID-DP Better protection than RAID (mirroring) Same cost, performance, and ease of use Business implications 7% more usable capacity than competitive offerings* Drive failures don t affect data availability Technical benefits 2, to 4, times more secure than RAID 5 More reliable than mirroring for double-disk failure 4% parity overhead versus 5% overhead with mirror* * Comparing 2P+2D versus 7+7 mirror Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 2

21 RAID-DP: High-Performance RAID 6 Systems using large disk drives need RAID-DP protection RAID-DP provides much better protection against data loss due to disk failures than RAID5 or RAID + RAID-DP costs less than RAID 5 and RAID + 5 4% fewer disks than RAID 5 43% fewer disks than RAID + RAID-DP performs well with high IOPS & throughput apps Meets the needs of OLTP, Exchange Much better performance than competitive RAID 6 implementations Loss per Million, RAID 5,, RAID + RAID-DP Data Loss Probability per Year for a 7 data drive system 6.5% % 2% 3.3%.3%.7%.% 2.2% 47GB 3GB 5GB GB FC SATA Data Loss Calculation Assumptions (FC & SATA). 2% annual drive failure rate 2. in 5 bits read drive uncorrectable error rate 3. RAID 5 group size = 6; RAID-DP group size = 6

22 Industry s Best Performance SPC- IOPS Performance 3,986 29,958 NetApp FAS34 24,997 Baseline Leading Vendor NetApp FAS34 8,997 Leading Vendor With Snapshot NetApp RAID-6 outperforms RAID- by 24% Gap increases to 234% with Snapshot turned on The NetApp Advantage: Better Data Protection Better Utilisation Higher performance More Granular Recovery Points Much Faster Recoveries Source: SPC- benchmarks January 29, 28,

23 Simplified Archiving Ease of management Availability and protection Flexibility and Performance Efficient and affordable archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 23

24 Flexibility and Performance New retention requirements? New regulations? Proper retention and deletion Rapid adaptation to regulations and policies Scale with little or no downtime Reallocate storage on the fly Faster archiving, search and retrieval Add protocols and applications Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 24

25 Flexibility and Performance Fast, flexible, more agile Less time managing data Deeper archive search Seamless end-user recovery Rapid adaptation to regulations and policies Faster archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 25

26 Enterprise Vault + NetApp: Fast, Scalable Archiving Scalability test: loading both systems with 25M s Performance advantage without and with drive failures NetApp: 2 drives failed in the same RAID group EMC: drive failed in 2 separate nodes Journaling for Compliance Mailbox Management E-Discovery Export to PST Index Rebuilds % Faster than EMC* 78% 26% 2% 229% 2% 255% 4% 222% * Baseline: Compared to EMC Centera G4 w/25m w/25m No Disk w/disk No Disk Messages Messages Failures Failures Failures Source: VeriTest and Procedo independent test reports, 26 w/disk Failures No Disk Failures w/disk Failures Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 26

27 Why Is NetApp SATA So Fast for Archiving? For sequential reads and writes NetApp SATA performs as well as FC Higher density makes up for slower RPM WAFL keeps the read/write head stationary for constant streams Read/Write Head Read/Write Head FC Drive Higher RPM SATA Drive Higher Density Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 27

28 Simplified Archiving Ease of management Availability and protection Flexibility and Performance Efficient and affordable archiving Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 28

29 Unique Architecture, Greater Efficiency (con t) Unified architecture scales NetApp 7% more usable disk out of box versus mirrored storage Management efficiency reduces ongoing costs Integrated block-level deduplication Lower power consumption, smaller footprint Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 29

30 Total Cost Comparison: Typical Archive Environments NetApp Single Unit Architecture: FC and SATA in same unit TCO equivalent to spare SAN 2 Reference Architecture: Separate NetApp units, one for FC and one for SATA Downtime Recovery Costs Total Cost Index Index Internal Operational Costs Product Acquisition and Ongoing Vendor Costs NetApp FAS with FC + SATA 55 NetApp FAS + Separate NearStore 65 6 EMC Centera New JBOD Deployment Source: Oliver Wyman (formerly Mercer Management Consulting) Archiving Total Cost Comparison, November JBOD with Spare SAN Capacity Only acquisition cost is reconfiguration of existing SAN Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 3

31 Selecting Your Storage Early Affects Solution Cost Without NetApp Difficulty synchronizing data backup Difficulty restoring system Increased storage reserves for backup Increased complexity with multiple UIs Data on different storage devices Loss of performance with disk failure With NetApp Cascading Snapshot copies to back up data Quick recovery with Snapshot copies Less storage needed for buffer reserves Single OS with product license keys Single data set for SQL, indexes, archives RAID-DP Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 3

32 NetApp and Symantec - Global Partnership Technology Integration Defined by Customer Needs Common Vision Simplify data management Maximize business value Integration at every level Significant investment from both Executive alignment Aligned development roadmaps Joint engineering and testing Integrated solutions in mixed environments Sales & Marketing Collaborative Services & Support Joint best practice blueprints Committed partner support Joint Escalation Program Coauthored documentation Joint field engagements Joint branding and marketing Joint sales tools and references Customers can count on the most trusted names in security, availability, and infrastructure to protect their business so they can focus on growing the business. Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 32

33 Customer Success: Lincoln Financial Group Lincoln Financial Group is a diversified financial services organization with over $237 billion in assets under management. Automated, policy-driven Built-in disaster recovery infrastructure Easy compliance, retention, and retrieval > 8% cost-per-megabyte savings More productive administrators More reliable systems More available data Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 33

34 E-Discovery and Compliance for Exchange at Irwin Mitchell With a staff of over 2,, Irwin Mitchell is the fourth largest law firm in the UK. 5% savings by using SATA 92% less time to add new storage capacity 89% reduction in recovery time objective Improved performance Expand capacity without purchasing and downtime Recover individual s Gain compliance and e-discovery capabilities Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 34

35 UZ Leuven UZ Leuven is one of the top medical healthcare providers in Europe, with 5 locations and more than 2 beds 4 months to full payback on investment 39K USD (287K EUR) annual productivity gain for users due to lower downtime 5% reduction in restore time 67% reduction in help desk calls % availability, up from 99.95%

36 Huge E-Discovery Savings at Symantec Symantec is a global leader in infrastructure software, with more than 7,5 employees and operations in over 4 countries worldwide. Automated, policy-driven Built-in disaster recovery infrastructure Cut discovery time from 5- hours to -2 hours per request Will save $5.6 million Enabled users to be more efficient and productive Reduced business risk Information Archiving with Symantec and NetApp 36

37 For More information Please visit our stand Thank you. 28 NetApp. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. NetApp, the NetApp logo, Go further, faster, Data ONTAP, NearStore, RAID-DP, SnapDrive, SnapLock, SnapManager, SnapMirror, SQL Server, Snapshot, SnapVault, and WAFL are trademarks or registered trademarks of NetApp, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Microsoft and SharePoint are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Symantec and Enterprise Vault are trademarks of Symantec Corporation. All other brands or products are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders and should be treated as such. Information Archival with Symantec and NetApp 37