Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories

Transcription

1 Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Report after Steering Committee meeting # dec. 2014, Brussels Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER [email protected], Authors: I. Puillat, S. Pichereau, P. Farcy, P.Morin Involved Institutions: Ifremer Version and Date: 1.0

2 JERICO WP11- SC December

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ATTENDEES STATEMENT OF DECISIONS REPORT AFTER STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Approval of the previous SC report and news after GA in Oslo WP2 (Henning Wehde) WP3 & WP5 & WP6 (D. Mills) WP8 (S. Sparnocchia) WP9 (I. Puillat for N. Pinardi) WP WPs overview and time line until the end of the project (P. Farcy) Dissemination of JERICO results D1.11 & Strategy for the future Final GA ANNEX : PRESENTED SLIDES

4 1. Document description REFERENCES Annex 1 to the Contract: Description of Work (DoW) version of the 22 Feb Document information Document Name Document ID Revision 1.0 Revision Date 5 jan; 2015 Author I. Puillat, S. Pichereau, P. Farcy, P. Morin Security History Revision Date Modification Author /12/2014 First draft I. Puillat, S. Pichereau 1.0 5/01/2015 First version P. Farcy Diffusion list Consortium beneficiaries Third parties Associated Partners other X This document contains information, which is proprietary to the JERICO consortium. Neither this document nor the information contained herein shall be used, duplicated or communicated by any means to any third party, in whole or in parts, except with prior written consent of the JERICO Coordinator. The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and liability. 4

5 2. Attendees Structure IFREMER SYKE NIVA IMR OGS CNR HCMR CEFAS HZG MI INSU/CNRS SMHI Contact Patrick Farcy Ingrid Puillat Sylvie Pichereau Loic Petit de la Villeon Seppo Kaitala Dominique Durand Kai Sorensen Andrew King Henning Wehde Rajesh Nair Stefania Sparnocchia Georges Petihakis David Mills Wilhelm Petersen Glenn Nolan Pascal Morin Magali Krieger Patrick Gorringe Excused: N. Pinardi (CMCC) 5

6 3. Statement of Decisions Decision Content Who, when 1 Organisation of the final meeting Coordination team + SC 2 Small questionnaire for the label application G. Petihakis 3 Jerico data labelled in Emodnet L. Petit de la Villeon P. Gorringe 4 WP7 and TOP Leaders 5 P. Farcy 6 Instructions for next reporting to be sent before mid February for TNA & SA real costs 7 Instructions for next reporting to be sent 1 st of March for financial and technical reports 8 Finalisation of all the 20 last deliverables All P. Farcy P. Farcy 9 Dedicated meeting for D1.11 WP leaders 10 Actions to create merged products from different platforms: (FB, FP) on 2 test sites North sea and Adriatic. 11 Calibration board: to produce a white paper and present it during the GA in April. CEFAS with HZG & Ifremer on North Sea And CNR in Adriatic HCMR and calibration board 12 Develop the glider part in D4.4 CSIC (J. Tintore) HCMR/HZG 13 TOP: we have to provide some monthly maps with data for temperature and salinity from ferry boxes and buoys. 14 Ask the commission for use of the the TNA costs for invitation of TNA users at the GA Ifremer with CEFAS, HCMR & NIVA P. Farcy 15 Special issue agenda and organisation I Puillat, editorial Board 17 Book agenda and organisation I Puillat & Nadia pinardi 18 D1.11: Summary of decisions and actions + new document version to be sent in January I Puillat & M. Krieger 19 D1.11: Fix the date of the physical meeting I. Puillat, P. farcy 20 D1.11: Organize video conference meeting M. Krieger 21 D1.11: SC will prepare a 1 page per country document for section D2.5 Atlas should be accessible on line on the JERICO website: transfer URL to BL. 23 WP4 FP: time line is fixed by WP4: to check in January Steering Committee H. Wehde G. Petihakis 24 WP4 FB: a draft to be sent end of January K. Sorensen 6

7 4. Report after Steering Committee meeting Agenda Monday, 15 h December 2014 Time slot Title Speaker Reference document 13:30-14:00 Welcome 14:00-14:30 - Approval of the previous Steering Committee All meeting reports and status of issued actions P. Farcy - what's new since the GA? ACTIONS, DELIVERABLES & MILESTONES WP LEADERS GA report 14:30-14:50 WP1: - JERICO Label G. Petihakis - FCT status and steps G. Nolan - D1.11: JERICO final report and strategy for the P. Morin future: introduction to tomorrow specific discussion P Farcy - WP1 deliverables, milestones 14:50-15:10 WP2: H. Wehdde - Deliverable and WP2 status, involvement of ROOSes -Actions and discussions undertaken to better describe gaps (cf. GA report) - WP2 coordination with WP3, WP4 and WP5 status 15:10-16:00 WP3 &WP4 W. Petersen, - Best practices for fixed platform: state of Carlos G. Petihakis document, - Feedback of FixO3 meeting on Fixed platforms, - JERICO actions, and needs - Status of WP3 tasks and deliverables - Calibration board WP4 - Status of WP4 tasks - Status of WP4 deliverables 16:00-16:20 Coffee Break 7

8 16:20-17:00 WP5 and WP7 - Status of TNA data flow - Status of WP5 deliverable - Status of SA delivery - TOP - Access to JERICO data- 17:00-17:20 WP6: - Status of WP6 tasks and deliverable - JERICO Newsletter: last editions 17:20-18:00 WP8: - Status of TNA - TNA funding: status End of first day meeting R. Nair P. Farcy D. Mills S. Sparnocchia - Tuesday, 16 th December 2014 Time slot Title Speaker Reference document 09:00-09:20 WP9: - Status of WP9 tasks and deliverable - Reports - Links with strategy for the future (in WP1) N. Pinardi 09:20-10:00 WP10: G. Nolan - Status of WP10 tasks and deliverable - Debriefing of entire WP activities, publications of development results 10:00-11:00 - Final General Assembly and specific P. Farcy workshops (JERICO Science days, TNA I. Puillat workshop, Stakeholders WorkShop ) - Agenda - Actors and actions 11:00-11:20 Coffee Break Draft agenda 11:20-12:20 - Dissemination of JERICO results: website, P. Farcy special issue, final GA communication Cefas (movies, press etc.), Dissemination of JERICO Data 12:20-12:45 - Technical and financial reporting agenda P. Farcy 12:45-13:45 Lunch 13:45-15:45 - Strategy for the future planning of the All redaction of the D1-11 List of actions 15:45-16:00 - Summary of decisions and actions P. Farcy 8

9 4.1 Approval of the previous SC report and news after GA in Oslo INTRODUCTION: GENERAL ASPECTS We are going through last steering committee: some comments with regard to the status after decisions taken during the previous SC meeting are synthesised here after for each WP. WPs Action Who Status Deliver the second FCT final report G Nolan Done report on going Complete the Label document and WP1 members + G the roadmap Petihakis Done Organize a stakeholders meeting P Farcy April 2015 Update the gap analyses report WP2 members + WP9 January 2015 Promote Task 2.2 WP2 members + BL TBD Organize a joint meeting between N Pinardi, H Wehde, P Done (October WP1, 2, 3 & 9 Gorringe 28 th ) Organize a workshop on fixed W Petersen + P Done (October platforms in common with WP4 Gorringe 27 th ) Update the fixed platforms data WP3 member + BL+ P base and make it available on the Gorringe website (+EMODNET) Done Organize a workshop on fixed platforms in common with WP3 Send a small questionnaire to the partners to see if they can apply the label recommendations WP4 members + WP3 HCMR Done (October 27 th ) TBDone soon Solve the issues with MyOcean WP5 members Done 5 Check that the JERICO data in L Petit de la Vileon + P TBDone EMODNET is labelled Gorringe 6 Promote the Summer School WP6 members Done 7 Work on the portal (data coming from JERICO partners + link with MyOcean and SeaDataNet) Initiate the TOP: application of JERICO data tools and 2 other TOPS 8 Prepare a final workshop focusing on TNA projects 9 Organize a meeting with WP1, 2, 3 10 WP7 members WP7 members + BL Done An action has to be done by WP7 coordination WP8 members April 2015 Done (October N Pinardi & 4 28 th ) Finalize the Villefranche WS report G Nolan Done Follow up on Task 10.5 and 10.6 G Nolan Will be done in the deliverables Deliver the technical and financial reporting to the EC 11 Propose an editorial group for a special issue All partners should give their real costs concerning TA and SA In green, the closed actions IFREMER + partners I Puillat + WP8, 9, 10 and 11 JERICO partners Done On going Done 9

10 WP1: FCT report almost finished: review in process with L. Coppola and F. Salvetat for the O2 experiment Label document: done, on the web site Stakeholder meeting: to be organised in April with final GA WP2 Update of gap analysis report: Magali Krieger (CNRS, WP1) is gathering information for D1.11. She will send received information to Henning Wehde who will upgrade the D2.2/ Deadline end January 2015 Promote task 2.2: with Bluelobster WP3 & 4 Meeting: done in Lisbon Update of fixed platforms data base: done in summer but there are more FB information on EMODNET database WP4 questionnaire for label: not done yet, should be done soon WP5: Issue with MyOcean: problem of NetCDF. Done In EMODNET: to be done. It should work, one field to be added in order to identify Jerico data (to be discussed with EMODNET (via P. Gorringe) WP6: done: 16 students at summer school. Action closed. WP7: Data portal: done TOP: to make available data from 3 kinds of platforms (recopesca,.ferry Boxes Fixed Platforms) and specific products according to the DOW. Still in process. Have to find how to display the data (Loïc shall consider this with Stefania). The data are available but we have to provide monthly maps with the results: to be organised by the WP7 leaders. Recopesca in Ireland: end of January; should be ok. WP8: Discussion for TNA data: SC almost agreed to say that there is no need to make all TNA data available. Loic PDV proposes to check what is possible to do for some data on Seadatanet. The results of TNA shall be presented during the Science day of the last General Assembly. WP9: done in Lisbon WP10: Villefranche workshop: report done 10.5 &10.6: will be included in upcoming deliverables. 10

11 WP11: reporting. December: we get the result from financial officer 5-6 form C were rejected. The last one is almost corrected and will be submitted soon. F-sign: a request of electronic signature has been done. But not validated by the EC. So all forms C will have to be finally signed by partners and sent in paper version. TNA and SA real costs: for final report we will anticipate the adjustments 2-3 months before. Stefania says it s particularly difficult for TNA because the period is on 4 years. She asks if we can extent the duration of SA to consume the entire budget over 4 extra months. Patrick F. will send an to EC to check if we can extent the SA duration, according to the budget. For next months, we have to focus on the deliverables: 20 deliverables to be finalized before end of April (see the time schedule for Milestones and Deliverables Below) A particular effort shall be made for the last deliverables and especially D1.11. Mil. no. Milestones name WP n Delivery month from DOW Actual Forecast achievement date Lead contractor Achieved Yes/No Comments Linked deliverable MS4 Final GA WP Ifremer No D11.6 MS12 Fifth steering committee outputs WP INSU/CNRS Ifremer MS13 User reports of activities WP INSU/CNRS No D1.10 MS14 Roadmap for the future WP INSU/CNRS No D1.11 MS15 Constitution of a permanent JERICO Working Group for Calibration Activities WP HCMR No TBD MS18 Report on activities WP OGS No D5.7 MS19 MS23 MS24 MS25 Final JERICO management Handbook Software and manuals for new image analysis techniques (including Flowscan and Zooscan) Recommendations Report for autonomous carbon measurements Data report on salinity and Temperature measurements from XBT and FerryBox WP OGS WP INSU/CNRS (not BLIT as indicated in the DOW) WP MI No D10.3 WP10 26 X MI MS27 Report on activities WP IMR No D2.5 MS28 Report on activities WP HZG No D3.5 MS29 Final Report OSE WP HCMR No D9.5 MS30 Final Report OSSE WP DMI No D9.6 No No No No to December 2014 steering committee D5.6 & D5.8 Milestone MS23 brought in line with Deliverable D10.2 Will not be achieved during the period due to the failing of NERC 11

12 Del. no. D1.8 D1.10 Deliverable name WP n Delivery date from DOW Second report of the FCT activity Second report of the access activity Actual/ Forecast delivery date DEAD LINE 1 M36 M40 M44 1 WP LEADER CNRS Lead beneficiar y IFREM ER M42 M42 M47 CNRS CNR D1.11 Final report 1 M48 M48 M48 D2.5 Integrated Pan European Atlas/second report D3.5 Conclusion report D4.4 D4.5 D5.5 D5.6 D5.7 D5.8 D7.1 D8.1 D9.5 D9.6 D10.1 D10.2 D10.3 D10.4 "Report on best practice in operation and maintaining Report on running costs of observing systems Report on uncertainty DM data management handbook V2 Second data management report RT data management handbook V2 Service Access Provision Trans National Access Provision Second report on OSE Second report on OSSE Report on trials and deployments Set of software (analysis of SPI, Flowscan and Zooscan images) Report on data analysis (moored profile comparison, 3D T/S structure) Report on potential new sensors (fishing vessels and VOS) 2 M48 M48 3 M47 M42 M42 M46 4 M42 Μ42 4 M48 Μ48 M45 M44 CNRS IMR HZG HCMR HCMR CNRS IMR HZG HCMR HCMR 5 M42 M42 M46 OGS OGS 5 M48 M48 M46 OGS OGS 5 M48 M48 M46 OGS OGS 5 M48 M48 M46 OGS OGS 7 M48 M48 M47 Ifremer Ifremer 8 M48 M48 M47 CNR CNR 9 M36 M44 M44 CMCC HCMR 9 M36 M44 M44 CMCC DMI 10 M36 M41 M45 MI MI 10 M42 M42 10 M42 M42 10 M42 M42 M45 M47 M47 MI MI MI CNRS HZG Ifremer D11.6 Final report 11 M48 M48 M48 Ifremer Ifremer 12

13 4.2 WP1 JERICO Label: presentation by George Petihakis, see slides Recommendations can be moved to criteria at the latest stage Data issue is not mentioned a lot, only in section 2. We need to work on that issue for JERICO next. Observing purpose: we decided a list of parameters Sustainability of the Label: the idea was to link it to the Eurogoos Agreement with ESONET and Fixo3 label committees. A common label is needed for Fix03, Esonet, JERICO. Common meeting with Fix03 and ESONET: JF Rolin, R Lampitt, during final GA. This could be arranged with the stakeholder meeting, because we have to explain what it means, and what is the interest. Definitions and criteria: sustainability, operationability, data issues (have to work on and grow in Jerico Next), levels and infrastructures, rules applied, nomination of the label and update every 3 years, protection of the label and mitigating measures, environmental impact, recommendations It is expected to have a permanent group. This is in JERICO NEXT As next steps with JERICO NEXT, it is proposed to go further than technical aspects: to include and validate the scientific strategy. G Petihakis proposes 3 committees: scientific, technical and data management G Petihakis will send a questionnaire to check where are the possible problems to apply for the label FCT status and next steps: Presentation by Glenn Nolan, See slides White paper on DO sensors: the white paper is on the website under publications, and will be published in the book. D1.8: almost finished D1.9: quite finished. Some add-on from Ifremer are waited before submission D1.11: in dedicated session tomorrow Deliverables and status: P. Morin We are waiting for D1.8, D.1.10 (postponed to month 47), D1.11 (month 48) Milestones: expected MS 13, and MS14 (with D1.11) in M47 and M48 PRESENTATION OF MOONGOOS (M. Krieger) Maps of stations per country from D.3.3, incoherence in some maps: lacking information on some and not on others. Emodnet is the best source to get information, the lacks are known. 13

14 4.3 WP2 (Henning Wehde) D2.2: update existing deliverable, critical review and update by the regions with help of M. Krieger. Contributions have to be arranged for with D.1.1 and D3.5 D2.5: update of the online atlas: need to harmonise with EMODNET: to finalise in February Metadata are there. There is a double work with EMODNET to better describe the gaps: need to be discussed and harmonized. EuroGOOS and HFRadar have to be included. The Atlas should be accessible on line (in interactive mode) on the JERICO website: URL to get and transfer it to Blue Lobster, design has to be improved. To see for GA: presentation of the ATLAS but with Data access, data tool, TNA data to be discussed 4.4 WP3 &4 WP3: by Willhelm Petersen: see slides D3.1: report postponed, deliver in February D3.2: update of D3.2 done last summer D3.3: Since Oslo meeting: 3 meetings: GA: Lisbon, FB Task harmonization and merging quality assessed data from fixed platform systems in ROOSes: responsibility: CEFAS: but Rodney Foster not any more in CEFAS This task is not easy to complete because of the heterogeneous structure. This can be done because data are all going to Myocean but how to show that? By showing a merged product? Responsibility of CEFAS Harmonization and merging quality assessed data from FP in ROOS regions: activity cross cutting through WP3 and will harmonize the outputs of FP with other systems such as FB/VOS : Test sites North Sea (Cefas, HZG, Ifremer) and Adriatic (CNR). WP = Should be an exercise and demonstration how to use two different platforms. Actions: CEFAS: to create to merged products from different platforms: (FB, FP) on 2 test sites North sea (CEFAS, HZG, Ifremer) and Adriatic (CNR) I. Puillat: a common work WP9 can answer: data coming from different platforms are assimilated. It can be a good illustration.. Idea: to show how data can fit together, and then to show we can have some common products (composite time series, maps ) D3.4: done in June 2014: 17 partners but only a few really active Task comparison of new sensors and assessment of their applicability for FP Still have to finish D3.5 with best practices: end of February WP4. George: see slides Weak points: D4.4: difficult, but important because we need to feed the Label. 14

15 People are busy at the end of the project Solved in FixO3: participation to workshop funded by the organizing partner Glider: link with Groom community.to summarize input from this community For FP: time line is fixed by WP4: 17 December & 22 January are important dates to check For FB: Kai: a draft to be sent at the end of January to all, Question: Kai: should we separate the deliverable in 3 deliverables, or make a common one? For the need of the GA, we have only one deliverable. For the future use of that document, we can split the deliverable into 3 manuals. G Petihakis: There is an important heterogeneity in between each part: glider = 4 pages only because reference to D5.1 of Groom, whereas other parts are pages It needs the creation of a grid of two levels: partners and users: calibration labs and reference labs. Calibration board: to produce a white paper should be ready and presented during the GA in April. Glider should be extended: to contact J. Tintore. 4.5 WP5 & 7 WP5: Rajesh Nair D.5.1: delivered D.5.2. & D.5.3: will need a reissue D5.4: after feedback from Florence, the document will be revised. It needs refinement. It will be reissued at the end of D5.5 is ready for Chla, T, S: slightly delayed in delivery D5.6 & D5.8 draft prepared, but requires some further work. should be ready month 46. They want to focus on the four main platforms they have. We have to agree on one quality standard to harmonise things done in other projects: like Atlantos etc.. Action: TOP to be done (PF) TOP: we have to provide some monthly maps with data for temperature and salinity from ferry boxes and buoys (NIVA and HCMR) 4.6 WP6 (D. Mills) Main achievements since Oslo: summer school: 16 participants and 16 staff members. WP6: - Status of WP6 tasks and deliverable - JERICO Newsletter: last editions 2nd Summer School : 16 participants (Malta 80 participants, 30 selected), 16 staff, very positive evaluation from participants. 15

16 Promotion was not considered as good. Malta is more appealing than the Netherlands Technical content scared people away Deltares did not subsidise travel contrary to Malta. WH: Ask why the Malta participants not selected for the 1 st summer school didn t apply to Delft. In Malta, half of the students were subsidized and were from North Africa. 4.7 WP8 (S. Sparnocchia) 3 calls: 9 project reports submitted + 4 in preliminary version, 1 peer reviewed paper, 10 presentations to conferences, 1 project failed (equipment broken) days of access delivered to users for the 19 projects. Budget: of allocated in the GA Remaining User reports are expected within January Last TNA deliverable will be provided in March (M47). New section on the website: TNA outcomes 4.8 WP9 (I. Puillat for N. Pinardi) 4 slides have been presented to give a short debriefing after the Lisbon WP9 meeting. Workshop EuroGOOS Models and statistical methods Impact of existing systems (OSE) Impact of future observational platforms (OSSE) Inputs for the Roadmap for the future (D1.11) Experiments have been carried out in European shelf areas Several papers published. 2 contributions to the special issue Workshop in Lisbon to discuss final results Reports for D9.5 N. Pinardi prepared a questionnaire asking for the most important existing and future systems, results provided for modelling Find the model errors, and try to find complementary elements improving the quality. Deliverables should be send end of December. G Petihakis: the question arrives rather late, should be discussed at the beginning of the project: that s now a good evolution for Jerico next. 16

17 4.9 WP10 6 meetings D10.1: done, broadly complete, still waiting for some inputs, should be ready by late January D10.2 set of software developed, delivered by late January D10.3 scientific publications (require significant input from partners), deliver late March D10.4: we should have certain discussions (with Willy for deliverable 3.4: Recopesca and other technologies: ferry box and gliders: point on what s going on, the lap and emerging technologies). Inputs from Laurent Delauney and Michaela from CNR. Stefania suggests a video-conference WPs overview and time line until the end of the project (P. Farcy) See Patrick s slides and list of deliverables and milestones with calendar. All deliverables are passed through. Technical and financial reporting should start mid February in order to have it ready by end of April. We must have a GA before the end of project to make the costs eligible. Documents to be sent mid February for reporting Dissemination of JERICO results Special issue and book Expected contribution from WP8: issue for access services, produced services to research, data provided through the infrastructure and results gained in Jerico. Missing inputs: WP9 synthesis + chapter for OO Label part + cost Part FB: Willy x2 Kai: abstract not received Process (one year) Book Possible editor: Springer GA: presentation + draft Official submission: end of May- mid of June Special Issue Possible Journal: JMS; Ocean Sciences? GA : presentation + draft Official submission: end of May- mid of June Structure of the book to be prepared, and 2 3 referees at least 17

18 the proposed abstracts should fit inside Link to be considered with the book on operational oceanography (P. gorringe) Keep a chapter to explain the lings with other publications Add the label and costs Persons involved in the editorial board: N. Pinardi & WP leaders and deputies, D. Durand, scientific advisory board Scientific advisory board could help Persons involved in the editorial board: I Puillat, P. Morin, g. Petihakis, S. Sparnocchia, B. Karlson, J. Seppala, R. Bellerby; G. Nolan. Actions Time line at short term: Review of the content: 5 January Video conference meeting 6-7 January: missing part, + merging? Send it around to WP and the consortium to get missing papers Send it editor 1 week later, feedback by end of January 4.12 D1.11 & Strategy for the future Reminder: Objective of D After JERICO(FP7): next steps? - A roadmap for the future: to fill gaps in observing network & parameters, possible legacies, next R&D challenges - Introduce JERICO-NEXT Organisation and time line: - Gathering of inputs coming from many of us - Video conference meeting every week or 10 days - New organisation of the document and participants New structure: 1. Introduction: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6 (partly?) Pascal and Magali 2. R&D to answer science and society needs: status, gaps, and future: 4.2, status after WP10, opening to JERINO NEXT WP1 &3, need of parameters & sensors (new ones or more mature, input after FCT) Glenn and Ingrid, Dominique, Joaquin, George, David 3. Monitoring systems: from network to plateforms and to sensors (parameters in section before): status, gaps, and future: 3.5 & 4.5. (should be linked to section 2) Pascal, Magali, Henning, WP9, Patrick G., Seppo, 4. Data access (3.9) : status, gaps, and future, Rajesh & Loic, Leonidas, Patrick G., seppo 5. From nowadays National and European strategies to the future one(s): 3.7, 3.8, 4.3, 4.4, 4.1: Glenn & David, Dominique, Patrick G. 6. Conclusion: JERICO-NEXT as a step forward, coordination team 18

19 Discussion: DM: Document put in google doc. Google doesn t track changes = it s a problem. PF: If Jerico is successful, we need a meeting to discuss of the deliverables and future. DM: different scenarios: 1 funding declining: do more with less, 2 sustainable funding = statu quo 3 increasing investment. The use of the data, MSFD, operational requirements, generic requirements for research. GN: Check points projects for North Sea and Med Sea DM: Inputs from end users for gap analysis important. WP: WP9: local investigations but not an overall view. GP: Blue Med project: gaps and needs defined by stakeholders. Questionnaire to contact stakeholders for knowing gaps. GP will give information of this project. 5. GP: important contributions have been made in other projects and need to be integrated. DM: if Jerico Next will not be successful, what will be the consequences for Europe? Will cost more to everybody. We need to illustrate with good examples. DM, DD, PG and GN will contribute to this part. Section 2: GP informations on the future technology taken from the FCTs. We need mature sensors but also new sensors for biological parameters. Need for smart sensors: plug and play, generic information data transfer, = Section 4.5 in Section 2. RN+DM: From individual (national) levels to a network: label, = added value GN: Condensed version (1 page) for policy makers and national funding agencies. **question: section 3 per region or per plateform? Maybe per region in section 5. Time line: Specific inputs fixed to 5 January WP review: Physical meeting February or 1 st week of March. WP s Feedback. Final version in early April. Validation by final GA at end of April. Actions: Summary of decisions and actions + new document version to be sent by the end of the month (IP + Magali) Fix the date of the physical meeting (IP PF) Organize video conference meeting (Magali) SC will prepare a 1 page per country document for section 5. This would be useful for the stakeholders meeting aside from the GA and to support national initiatives. (all) Check the bloom initiative (to be sent by George), take in consideration JPI and other references. 19

20 4.13 Final GA We propose to have an extended steering committee the Monday afternoon, from 4 to 7 pm Starting the official GA: Tuesday morning Minimum 2 days and half: GA: 1 day restricted to partners, Science day: started the Tuesday afternoon at 4pm after the GA up to the Wedneday evening 6pm. Dedicated to TNA and WP9 and WP10 results. TNA users should come and present their results because it is in the agreement. TNA: mn for each presentation Poster session: to show activities supported by Jerico (TBD) Stakeholder meeting: do we invite stakeholders only to that meeting or also in GA? During the GA usually a different level of communication is used, dealing with specificities and expertise in some fields, it is not suitable for stakeholders. They can get lost or worse get a wrong message. And it is too long. The project should be presented in a communication way suitable to their expectations and to ours. Maybe a presentation of the D1.11 should be better. We can send them a document to prepare their venue (one page per nation / strategy). Round tables topics: 1hour each - Network extension - Technical development needs - European Strategy (EC: TNA; Giuseppina Pappalardo: ESFRI; ) - MFSD / Policy requirement, societal needs: how JERICO would help? - Policy for coastal data at European level: EMODNET (Ian.Shepherd, Jan Bart Calewaert) Invitations to prepare: EUROGOOS EMODNET, COPERNICUS JPI ocean: should be involved to have a representative of the European Councils to get feedback on JERICO networks. Representative of IFREMER in JPI (F. Coroner), and Katherine Angell Hansen secretary JPI, + Norway Marine Board EEA OCEAN of TOMORROW projects; NEXOS, SENSENET, EURO-ARGO, EMSO, FIXO3, ATLANTOS, GROOM, SEADATANET 20

21 Program and Agenda General Assembly in France Brest - April 27-30, 2015 Time table Monday 27 Tuesday 28 Wednesday 29 Thursday 30 08:30-09:00 Welcome GA Coffee Coffee 09:00-09:20 WP2 Science Day (con t) Stakeholders 09:20-09:40 WP3 WP9 results And round tables 09:40-10:00 WP4 TNA presentations 10:00-10:20 WP5 10:20-10:40 WP6 10:40-11:00 Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break 11:00-11:20 WP7 11:20-11:50 WP1 11:50-12:20 WP8 12:20-12:50 WP9 13:00-14:00 Lunch Lunch Lunch 14:00-14:30 WP10 Strategy for the 14:30-15:30 WP11 future 15:30-15:00 Coffee Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break 16:00- All members Beginning Preparation of the Science day GA and Strategy Meeting WP10 results 19:30 Cocktail Dinner 21

22 22

23 5.Annex : presented slides 23

24 WP1 DELIVERABLES MILESTONES Deliverable Number Deliverable Title Delivery date Status Deliverables D1.1 First call for TNA proposals 8Done D1.2 Rationale and definitions for a common strategy 9Done D1.3 Terms of reference of the FCT 9Done WP1 A Common Strategy P. Morin, I. Puillat, D. Durand, P. Farcy, M. Krieger D1.4 JERICO Label definition 18V2 postponed D1.5 Second call for TNA 20Done proposals D1.6 First report of the FCT 24Done activity D1.7 First report of the access 24Done activity SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels WP4 - JERICO -2 WP1 DELIVERABLES MILESTONES WP1 DELIVERABLES MILESTONES Deliverables Deliverable Number Deliverable Title Delivery date Status Milestones Milestone Number MS5 Milestone Name First Steering committee outputs Delivery date Comments First Steering 9 committee report Status Done D1.8 Second assessment of the FCT activity 36 MS6 Infrastructure available for users 11Call Done D1.9 Definition strategy and interfaces with the monitoring of marine biodiversity 36Done MS7 MS8 First Forum for coastal technology Second Steering committee outputs 18First forum report Done Second Steering 18 committee report Done Second report of the D access activity D1.11 Final Report 48 MS9 Third Steering committee outputs Third Steering 27 committee report Done MS10 Second Forum for coastal technology Second forum 30 report Done WP4 - JERICO -3 WP4 - JERICO -4 WP1 DELIVERABLES MILESTONES MONGOOS FIXED PLATFORMS Milestones Scheduled Milestones MS11 Fourth Steering committee outputs Fourth Steering 36 committee report Done MS12 Five Steering committee outputs Five Steering 45 committee report Ongoing MS13 User report of activities 47Final report MS14 Roadmap for the future 48Final report Maps come from the D3.3 WP4 - JERICO -5 SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels 1

25 The goal of the document is to make a point on the information we have in the deliverables. Example 1 : For each country : Maps with position of the stations (name of the systems, type of parameters) Map from the D3.3 A map with parameters measured by each station Map from D2.3 WP4 - JERICO -7 WP4 - JERICO -8 Example 2 : Italy In addition to the maps, the document uses information from the deliverables about recommendations and costs for each type of platform. Some stations seem to miss on this map At the end of each section (corresponding to each type of platform), there is a part «Questions». Maps from D3.3 WP4 - JERICO -9 WP4 - JERICO -10 Examples of questions 1) See question 1 for MONGOOS area and question 2 for Italy. 2) Do you have something to add about gaps/recommendations? (4.3. Recommendations from the D.2.2) 3) I didn t find anything about the costs in the deliverable. Who could give the information? Or where could I find the information? 4) About this part of the document, do you have something to add, modify? WP4 - JERICO -11 2

26 FCT CHRONOLOGY WITHIN JERICO 1 st FCT: held in conjunction with Seatech week, Brest, 2012 Argo Float Waves T/S Currents Tide gauge Ferrybox / Repeat CTD HF Radar Focus on field measurements Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients were highlighted in Survey FORUM FOR COASTAL TECHNOLOGIES Glenn Nolan, Yannick Aoustin, Phil Monbet. Attendees agreed that a calibration workshop to exchange know-how would be worthwhile After 1 st FCT: White paper on DO produced (L.Coppola and co-authors) Speaker I Organism I adresse mail Date I City I Land 12/15/2014 TITLE - JERICO - 2 FCT CHRONOLOGY WITHIN JERICO ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROGRESS 2 nd FCT: held in conjunction with Oceanology, London, 2014 Session 1: Calibration protocols and Environmental Technology Verification Schemes Included both companies and end users of the sensors Session 2: Moderated discussion involving 30 attendees 40% of participants from Industry Reports available for survey and 1 st FCT: Deliverable 1.6: on web White paper also available Report of 2 nd FCT complete (and links to presentations) (not on web) Deliverable 1.4: Assessment of FCT activity (TBC) 12/15/2014 TITLE - JERICO /15/2014 TITLE - JERICO - 4 1

27 WP 2 STRUCTURE! Status WP2 Strengthening regional and trans-regional activities!! SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels!! 7 partners, 2 tasks, 5 deliverables Task 2.1: State of the Art in Coastal observing systems Henning Wehde IMR, SMHI, Deltares,IH, AZTI, INGV, IO-BAS Task 2.2 Cross regional integration and demonstration Irene Lake - SMHI, IMR, Deltares,IH, AZTI, INGV, IO- BAS WP4 - JERICO - 2! DELIVERABLES! D-2.1 Report on existing observation network from all ROOSs D-2.2 Report on recommendations for future research and developments for filling gaps in the areas where observations are unattainable due to lack of best practice or technologies from all ROOSs D-2.3 Integrated Pan European Atlas/first report on Coastal Observing systems, update at the end of the project D-2.4 Demonstration of the feasibility of joint trans-regional product production Transports and E-HYPE D-2.5 Integrated Pan European Atlas/second report on Coastal Observing systems, update at the end of the project! WP4 - JERICO - 3! WP4 - JERICO - 4! Main work/achievement since Oslo GA! ONLINE ATLAS D-2.5! Work on deliverable D-2.5!! D-2.5 Integrated Pan European Atlas/second report on Coastal Observing systems, update at the end of the project!! Updating Deliverble D-2.2!! D-2.2 Report on recommendations for future research and developments for filling gaps in the areas where observations are unattainable due to lack of best practice or technologies from all ROOSs! WP4 - JERICO - 5! WP4 - JERICO - 6! 1

28 ONLINE ATLAS D-2.5! ONLINE ATLAS D-2.5! WP4 - JERICO - 7! WP4 - JERICO - 8! FIXED STATIONS CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE! ONLINE ATLAS D-2.5! Green = actual data! Magenta = historic data! White = no data!! DELTARES! WP4 - JERICO - 9! December 15, 2014 WP4 - JERICO - 10! FIXED STATIONS OXYGEN! Green = actual data! Magenta = historic data! White = no data!! DELTARES! WP4 - JERICO - 11! December 15, 2014 WP4 - JERICO - 12! 2

29 FIXED STATIONS TURBIDITY & PH! turbidity! ph! NUTRIENTS AND LIGHT! Only at CEFAS Smartbuoys: Nitrate Silicate Light extinction December 15, 2014 Green = actual data! Magenta = historic data! White = no data!deltares! WP4 - JERICO - 13! December 15, 2014 WP4 - JERICO - 14! ACHIEVEMENTS: WEAK POINTS/ WORK TO DO! D-2.5 Regions: Critical review of the physical station information Finalisation non physical parameter station information Inclusion in the Online Atlas tool Improvement of design of Online tool D-2.2 Update Existing Deliverable Critical review and Update by the Regions Help by Magali/Coordinator to get that review & update conducted è contribution to D-1.11 section 3.5 WP4 - JERICO - 15! WP4 - JERICO - 16! UP COMING OBJECTIVES! Deliverable D-2.5 Finalisation of the online version. Delivery date according to DOW and ECAS participant Portal.M 48 è April 2015 aim to finalise Februar 2015 All regions to contribute with the nonphysical parameters è end of january Inclusion of the station information into the online tool è aim to finalise Februar 2015 Deliverable D-2.2 Update All regions update their part of the deliverible. è contribution to D-1.11 Aim to finalise update End of January 2015 WP4 - JERICO - 17! 3

30 WP3: HARMONIZING TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS WP3: status & Roadmap W. Petersen, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels General Objectives: To provide a common base for the operational use of FerryBoxes, gliders, fixed platforms along European coasts To review the current status of existing systems in operational use in European seas To define the best technical practices for compatible, robust and cost-effective systems To define procedures for harmonizing and merging quality assessed FerryBox and Fixed Platform data at regional (ROOS) level To define procedures and technological solutions for integration and testing of new sensors on these systems WP4 - JERICO -2 TASK LEADERS: Task 3.1 FerryBox: Task 3.2 Glider: Task 3.3. Fixed Platform: Task 3.x.3 test & application of new sensors: Syke (Seppo) CSIC (Joaquin) CEFAS (Rodney) has to replaced by another person HZG (Willi) D3.1) Report on current status of ferrybox: Task Report of the first Workshop on experiences using a FB system (systems, sensors, quality control, data handling), best practice and identifying problems and lacks of best practice [month 9] D3.2) Report on current status of gliders observatories within Europe: Task Report on the first workshops of gliders observatories within Europe [month 15] D3.3) Review of current marine fixed instrumentation: Task Review of current marine fixed instrumentation sites describing best practice for operating fixed platforms and identification of potential new sites including an updatable catalogue of hardware used, and a map of locations (results from T & T 3.3.2) [month 21] D3.4) Report on new sensor developments: Report on new sensor developments and their suitability for different platforms (FB, Glider, fixed Platforms) linked with tasks 3.1 and 3.3 [month 36] D3.5) Conclusion report: Task Report summing up the main conclusions from the 2nd workshop on the best practice, common procedures and agreed standards of FB systems [month 42] WP4 - JERICO -3 WP4 - JERICO -4 WP 3: Main achievement since Oslo GA STATUS TASK 3.1 FERRYBOX (FB) (responsible Seppo Kaitala): Task 3.1 FerryBox: 1 st JERICO FerryBox workshop (30-31 August 2011 at HZG) Report of 1 st JERICO FerryBox workshop (distributed Nov. 2011) Best practice of FB systems (T 3.1.2) (together with WP 4): first discussion in 1 st workshop, continued in joint WS (WP3 & 4) about Best Practice in Oct 2012 in Crete) -> forming of a working group, led by Kai Sorensen (NIVA) - Short meetings: - FB workshop Helsinki Apr Oslo (GA), May FB workshop Tallin, Sep EuroGOOS Conf Lisbon, Oct 2014 D 3.1. Report on current status of FerryBox (updated February 2014) WP4 - JERICO -5 WP4 - JERICO -6

31 WP 3.2 GLIDER TASKS : taskleader Joaquin (CSIC) WP 3.3 FIXED PLATFORM (FP) TASKS: Taskleader Rodney Forster Tasks: 3.2.1: Review current status of glider operation in Europe 3.2.2: Define the best technical practices for operation a fleet of glider Activities: Workshop Gliders May 2012 joint meeting with GROOM* and EGO** (done) JERICO Glider Questionnaire (done) Questionnaire analysis (done) Report on current status of glider observatories within Europe Deliverable 3.2 (done) * GROOM: Gliders for Research, Ocean Observation and Management, Start Oct. 2011, Duration 36 months ** EGO: Everyone s Glider Observatories 3.3.1: Review of the current status of all existing fixed observing sites Deliverable 3.3. (done Aug 2013) 3.3.2: Workshop to identify elements of fixed platform technology which clearly represent best practice (WS in Rome April 2012 and Crete 2012). Further half day meetings in Oslo Feb 2014 and Lisbon (Oct 2014) D 4.4 (joint activity with WP4, in preparation) 3.3.3: Harmonization and merging quality assessed data from fixed platform systems in ROOSes???? 3.3.4: Comparison of new sensors and assessment of their applicability for fixed stations <-> WP 10 D 3.4 (done June 2014) WP4 - JERICO -7 WP4 - JERICO -8 WP3: ACHIEVEMENTS: WEAK POINTS WP3: ACHIEVEMENTS AND WEAK POINTS Overview WP3 contributions Number of IFREMER SYKE IBWPAN NIVA OGS CNR HCMR NERC HZG MUM CEFAS SMHI CSIC NIOZ MI AZTI INSU PUERTO partners (FR) (FI) (PL) (NO) (IT) (IT) (GR) (UK) (DE) M (BE) (UK) (SE) (ES) (NL) (IE) (ES) (FR) S (ES) involved P.-No PM WP 3.1 FerryBox o X X X X X X X X X 9 WP 3.2 Glider X X X o X X 6 WP 3.3. Fixed Platf X X X X X X X o X X X X? X 13 From 17 partners only a few are really active partners in total: 17 budget: ~550 T total personal month: 105 WP4 - JERICO -9 Tasks completed: Most tasks in schedule or already completed Only one deliverable (D3.5, conclusion report T3.1 (FB)), postponed to Feb Remaining tasks: Best practise for all three kinds of platforms together with WP 4 ( D 4.4) FB and GL first draft available FP: very heterogeneous structures, some efforts necessary in task 3.3 (CEFAS), working group, lead: Carlos 3.1.3: Harmonization and merging quality assessed data from FB systems in ROOS regions (already common practice, data delivered to MyOcean) 3.3.3: Harmonization and merging quality assessed data from fixed platform systems in ROOS regions (NOOS, BOOS, MOON, IBI-ROOS): This activity is cross-cutting through WP3 and will harmonize the outputs of fixed platforms with other systems such as FerryBox/ships of opportunity. Test sites: North Sea (Cefas, HZG, Ifremer) and Adriatic (CNR). Exercise lead by task leader of task 3.3??? WP4 - JERICO -10 UP COMING OBJECTIVES Finalizing Deliverable D3.5 (D3.5, conclusion report T3.1 (FB), postponed to Feb 2015, after finishing D4.4 Support activities in WP4 regarding deliverable D4.4 (best practise) Harmonization and merging quality assessed data from fixed platform systems in ROOS regions (NOOS, BOOS, MOON, IBI-ROOS): This activity is cross-cutting through WP3 and will harmonize the outputs of fixed platforms with other systems such as FerryBox/ships of opportunity. Test sites: North Sea (Cefas, HZG, Ifremer) and Adriatic (CNR).???? WP4 - JERICO -11

32 Main achievement since Oslo GA WP4 HARMONIZING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE METHODS 1. Best practices WS in Lisbon 27 th of October Participants 2. Presentations on Best Practice deliverable Fixed Platforms Ferry Box Gliders 2. Permanent Calibration Working Group 1. Establishment of board Teleconference on the 20 th of November Future actions 3. Proposed papers in the special volume 1. Calibration 2. Biofouling 3. Platform Costs SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels WP4 - JERICO - 2 ACHIEVEMENTS: WEAK POINTS UP COMING OBJECTIVES Problems 1. Deliverable (D4.4 Report on Best Practices) proved a difficult one. An important deliverable since it will feed the Label 2. We all seem to be very busy especially towards the end of the project 3. Lessons learnt particularly useful experience à FixO3 4. Base ground for JERICO-NEXT Del. no. Deliverable name Delivery date from DOW Actual/ Forecast delivery date Estimated indicative personmonths) Lead benificiary D4.1 Report on existing facilities M18 Μ HZG D4.2 D4.3 D4.4 Report on calibration best practices "Report on biofouling prevention methods "Report on best practice in operation and maintaining M36 Μ HZG M36 Μ CNR M42 Μ HCMR D4.5 Report on running costs of observing systems M48 Μ CEFAS WP4 - JERICO - 3 WP4 - JERICO - 4 Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Report on existing calibration facilities D4.1 Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER, [email protected], : Authors: Michael Haller, Wilhelm Petersen, George Petihakis, Manolis Ntoumas, Involved Institutions: HZG, HCMR Report on Calibration Best Practices D4.2 Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER, [email protected], Authors: George Petihakis, Michael Haller, Wilhelm Petersen, Rajesh Nair, Jukka Seppälä, Florence Salvetat Involved Institutions: HCMR, HZG, OGS, SYKE, IFREMER Version and Date: V1.3 27/06/2014 Report on Biofouling Prevention Methods D4.3 Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER, [email protected], : Authors: M. Faimali, G. Pavanello, G. Greco, I. Trentin, S. Sparnocchia Involved Institution: CNR Date: V1.1-28/04/2014 D4.3.4 Running costs of coastal observatories Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER, [email protected], : Authors: Naomi Greenwood, Dave Sivyer, Stefania Sparnocchia, John Howarth, David Hydes, Bengt Karlson, Carlos Hernandez, Emma Heslop, Manolis Ntoumas, Begoña Begoña Pérez Gómez, Kaitala Seppo, Caterina Fanara, Glenn Nolan, Wilhelm Petersen, Lieven Naudts Involved Institutions: CNR, NOC, Cefas, SMHI, AZTI, SOCIB IMEDEA, HCMR, PUERTOS, SYKE, OGS, Marine Institute, HZG, MUMM Version and Date: 1 08/10/2014 WP4 - JERICO - 5 WP4 - JERICO - 6 1

33 D4.4 Best Practices D4.4 GLIDERS Ø Ø Ø To describe best practices in all phases of the system (pre-deployment test, maintenance, calibration etc) To adopt common methodologies and protocols Move towards the harmonisation of equipment, which will help in reducing maintenance and calibration costs. Platform Dependant : Ø Fixed Paltforms Ø FerryBoxes Ø Gliders Four Page Overview from GROOM D5.1 kindly provided by Lucas Merckelbach (HZG) Fixed Paltforms Ø Carlos Hernandez (AZTI) Ø Detlev Machoczek (BSH) Ø Yannick Aoustin (IFREMER) Ø Dave Sivyer (CEFAS) FerryBoxes Ø Kai Sörensen (NIVA) Ø Wilhelm Petersen (HZG) Ø Mark Hartman (NERC) Ø David Hydes (NOC) Ø Pascal Morin (CNRS) Ø Manolis Ntoumas (HCMR) Ø Seppo Kaitala (SYKE) Ø Malin Mohlin (SMHI) Gliders Ø IMEDEA group WP4 - JERICO - 7 WP4 - JERICO - 8 BASIC PARTS OF FP DEL. CONTRIBUTIONS Design Observing purpose Geographical location Materials Mooring lines Data transmission Energetic autonomy Suppliers Infrastructure Future upgrades Key aspects Sensors Telemetry Energy Operation Deployment/Installation Biofouling Corrosion Vandalism Safety Maintenance On site On land On board Data handling Validation Data handling Design D. Machoczek (BSH) R. Nair (OGS) I. Puillat (IFREMER) M. Ntoumas (HCMR) C. Hernández (AZTI) Key aspects P. Jaccard (NIVA) I. Puillat (IFREMER) C. Hernández (AZTI) Operation D. Machoczek (BSH) C. Hernández (AZTI) Maintenance On site On land On board Data handling M. Ntoumas (HCMR) Sara Almeida (IH) WP4 - JERICO - 9 WP4 - JERICO - 10 D4.4 FP TIMELINE FIXO3 BEST PRACTICES 17th December. Doc draft and call for contributions to a short list 10th January. Contribution deadline 10-14th January. Contributions integration on the doc. New draft. Distribution. 15th January. Skype meeting to discuss the draft and clear it. 22nd January. Deliverable ready. Integration on main document. Dedicated funds for workshops Preparatory work Documented Standard Operating Procedures by each partner Workshop in Athens 4-5 December 2014 Mainly technicians not PI s 1.5 days 20 persons (1-2 from each partner) Each subject was introduced with a short presentation followed by extensive discussion First draft after 1.5 months Finalised in a meeting for Best Practice and Label WP4 - JERICO - 11 WP4 - JERICO

34 FIXO3 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE MILESTONES Observatories Introduction Platform types (CNR, IFREMER, INGV, IEO) Mooring lines Buoys Seabed platforms Cabled observatories Design structure (OGS, GEOMAR, PLOCAN) Observing purpose: Parameters to measure and sensors selection Core Parameters Other Parameters FIXO3 Geographical location Mooring lines/anchoring Systems Data transmission/storage Underwater Surface to shore/positioning System Energetic autonomy Cabled Autonomous Energy Storage Power generation Solar Panels Wind turbines Data qualification/validation (CNRS, GEOMAR) Future directions (Univ. Aberdeen, 52North, UPC) Pre-Deployment Procedures (NOC, HCMR, CNRS, UPC) Maintenance Corrosion prevention Biofouling prevention Sensors Configuration/Installation (HCMR) Meteorological payload Oceanographic payload Bottom observatories modules Sampling Scheme Sensors Validation/Calibration On the lab On the field Deployment- Recovery (OGS, IFREMER, Univ. Aberdeen, UPC) Means R/V operations ROV operations Divers operations Deployment- Recovery Procedures Tests prior to deployment Safety regulations Post-Deployment Procedures (CNRS, IEO, CNR, INGV) Data Transfer Real time Delayed mode Data post processing Emergency procedures WP4 - JERICO - 13 MS. no. Milestones name WP n MS15 Constitution of a permanent Working Group within JERICO for Calibration Activities Delivery date from DOW Actual/ Forecast achievement date Lead contractor 4 M30 M30 HCMR WP4 - JERICO - 14 TASK 4.1 MS15 Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories CALIBRATION THE IDEA ü ü Standardize and harmonize various facilities across European networks, Share existing calibration facilities within the network, thus significantly reducing costs MS15 - Constitution of a permanent JERICO Working Group for Calibration Activities à Measurements to be metrologically sound, à Instruments to be working within known specifications at all times despite prolonged deployment in harsh conditions à Minimise costs Continuous, responsive, highquality calibrating activity Standardised techniques and specialised equipment ü Exchange and transfer know-how within the network through a series of workshops, seminars and staff exchange. Grant Agreement n Project Acronym: JERICO Project Title: Towards a Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories Coordination: P. Farcy, IFREMER, [email protected], : Authors: G. Petihakis, R. Nair, W. Petersen, J. Seppala, F. Salvetat, L. Coppola, M. Ntoumas, I. Puillat. Involved Institutions: HCMR, IFREMER, OGS, HZG, SYKE, CNRS Version and Date: Version November 2014 Create a permanent, pan-european calibration grid to support the activities of observatories WP4 - JERICO - 15 WP4 - JERICO - 16 THE GRID Two levels CALIBRATION BOARD 1 st Primary Reference Labs In Alphabetical order 2 nd Secondary Calibration Labs As a first product of the board, a white paper on marine calibration activities and practices in European laboratories will be produced and presented to the final JERICO General Assembly in April Partner Partner Partner User User User User * Joaquin del Rio from OBSEA has expressed his interest in joining WP4 - JERICO - 17 WP4 - JERICO

35 THE ORIGINAL IDEA (IN THE DOW) 5th Steering committee meeting Create a JERICO label: q To establish a consensus on guidelines for best practices in the design, the implementation, the maintenance, the data policy and the valorisation of operational coastal observatories; q To get, for the partners and all new comers that comply with this label, a fair recognition of the quality of the managed observatories; q To help stakeholders becoming aware of the European interest in the development of high quality coastal observatories; q To foster a wider market for the industry in sensor technology and platforms based on the agreed standards. JERICO LABEL Del. No Title Lead Man months Nature Dissemination Del. Date G. PetihakisI HCMRI [email protected] D1.4 JERICO label definition O PU 18 Dec / Brussels/ Belgium 5th SC THE REALITY THE LABEL V2.0 Lessons for the future Not an easy Task q Coastal observatories are complex and diverse q Criteria and standards must be rather general q Month 18 proved too soon as the Label needs long discussions and wide agreement between partners q The best practice deliverables which are cornerstones of the Label are delivered towards the end of the project To define the JERICO Label the following are taken into account: Ø The heterogeneity of the coastal observing systems to address the multiple space and time scales that characterise the variability of the coastal ocean; Ø The compliance with other normative efforts (EU projects such as SeaDataNet & MyOcean, EU initiative EMODnet); Ø The specificity of the coastal environment; Ø The heterogeneity of the processes and interacting scales; Ø The advancements on the observing technology and data transmission and availability; and Ø The advancements on the scientific knowledge of marine ecosystem processes. q Too little effort (only 2 man months were foreseen) A fit for purpose approach 5th SC 5th SC THE LABEL V2.0 OVERVIEW MAIN REPORT Sustainability Operationality Observing Purpose 1) Definition The JERICO Label is a set of criteria defined to ensure some standardisation and interoperability, and the quality of data for coastal observatories. 2) Criteria Sustainability: a 5-year funding road map from National and/or International sources is required. Long time-series is considered an advantage. 5th SC 5th SC 1

36 MAIN REPORT MAIN REPORT 2) Criteria cont. Operationality: Data Issues 2) Criteria cont. Observing Purpose: a Fit for Purpose Approach key issues : Ø Data is quality controlled following documented protocols. Ø Free and open access. Ø Long term archiving (more than 20 years) policy and implementation has to be performed for all types of data, including classified data. Archived datasets should be citable with a mention of the observation system. Ø Clear mechanism must be in place to guarantee data authorship traceability. Ø Data availability (real time delayed mode) compatible with the observation method (for example real time is required in operational systems). Ø Data frequency is compatible with the observation purpose capturing the time scale(s) of the observed phenomena. Thus in terms of measured parameters the observation system must have: Ø Primary or Core Parameters. These are basic parameters required for the specific observing purpose following the core parameter list. Ø Secondary Parameters. These are additional parameters which are good to have and although don t fall within the Primary or Core category, they are also measured. 5th SC 5th SC FIT-FOR-PURPOSE PARAMETER LIST MAIN REPORT An important issue is the specifications of the various sensor types in terms of range and accuracy. Although both characteristics will be judged against the observational purpose, it is mandatory that the sensors be registered in a database accessible under open data principles. 5th SC 3) Classification Scheme New Entry: New System (Sensor, Platform, Infrastructure) infrastructure enters JERICO scheme. Standard Level: The System (Sensor, Platform, Infrastructure) complies with the fit for purpose criteria with minor discrepancies. Full Level: The System (Sensor, Platform, Infrastructure) complies with the fit for purpose criteria and may also hosts extra parameters. 5th SC MAIN REPORT MAIN REPORT 4) Infrastructures The three different types of observing systems included in JERICO are: Ø Fixed platforms Ø Buoys Ø Platforms Ø Coastal stations Ø Stand-alone sensors (e.g. tide recorder) Ø Ferry Boxes Ø Passenger ships Ø Cargo ships Ø Research vessels Ø Gliders Ø Autonomous surface vehicles (e.g. wave gliders) Ø Autonomous underwater vehicles (e.g. buoyancy gliders) 5) Rules Applied The JERICO Label shall not supersede existing legal or safety regulations or requirements and in most cases applies as a subsidiary to existing standards. 6) Nomination of the Label - request à award - dedicated committee - the Label will be awarded for a three-year period. - fail à recommendations 7) Update of the label - update every 3 years. - Links with organisations, initiatives, projects 5th SC 5th SC 2

37 MAIN REPORT RECOMENDATIONS 8) Protection of the label No liability 9) Mitigating Measures Restriction / mitigation à time limit to comply 10) Environmental Impact - A precautionary approach - Acoustic devices and sea mammals - Ensure that electrical and acoustical noise are below the levels identified in the OSPAR agreement. - Follow the rules and recommendations of int. bodies such as IUCN and ICES. - Minimise disturbance to species and habitats during fieldwork - Seek permission for fieldwork in marine protected areas, where necessary - Retrieve all deadweight or unused devices. 5th SC 4.9 Recommendations Recommendations on sensing technologies Specific recommendations for coastal fixed monitoring platforms Specific recommendations for ferry boxes Specific recommendations for gliders Qualification and testing Define a life cycle of the equipment Define the list of equipment parts to be tested Define the type of tests to be performed Define the required testing facilities Test archiving Recommendations on Operating Issues Recommendations for Deployment-Installation Recommendations for Maintenance Recommendations for Biofouling prevention Recommendations for Metrology-Calibration 21 5th SC FUTURE PLANS ANNEXES AND REFERENCES Ø The Label will be updated every 3 years. Ø Sustainability issues à linked with a permanent European group such as EuroGOOS. Ø Agreement with ESONET and FixO3 Label committees. Ø Establish a permanent group by the end of JERICO project in 2015??? (depends on JERICO NEXT outcome) 5th SC q JERICO Label questionnaire q ESONET D.68 ESONET Label definition q JERICO D 3.1 Report on current status of Ferrybox q JERICO FCT First survey analysis q JERICO WP 2 Report on existing observation network from all ROOSs q JERICO D 4.2 Report on Calibration Best Practices q JERICO D 4.3 Report on Biofouling Prevention Methods q JERICO D 4.4 Report on Best Practice in conducting operations and maintaining q JERICO D 5.1 Data management q Glossary 5th SC WP3 Procedural Harmonisation Task 3.3: FixO3 label JERICO LABEL Label definition Rules Applied Nomination Protection Update Mitigating measures Environmental impact Recommendations coastal buoys Life cycle and tests Metrology, calibration A SYNTHESIS BUT NOT ONLY ESONET LABEL Life cycle and tests Deep sea stations Communication Interoperability Corrosion assessment New Issues 5th SC FixO3 LABEL Data management policy (WP4 and coordination) Deep sea mooring according to TNA experience Sensor interfaces (WP4) 5th SC 3

38 JERICO NEXT Task 1.6: Strategy for the future and the JERICO label (M24-M48) Ifremer, IRIS, HCMR, CNRS, MI, SOCIB, SYKE, FMI, CEFAS SubTask 1.6.1: Will synthesise technical and scientific parts of the JERICO Label. A synthesis of the how to to deliver a harmonized infrastructure compliant with EMODNet and Copernicus will be produced as part of D1.4. It will include an upgrade of the JERICO label elaborated within the JERICO(FP7) project. This label will no longer be restricted to purely technological considerations but will meet specific standards regarding: (1) the validity of the observation strategy, (2) the quality of the technology, and (3) the adequacy of data storing and handling procedures. The JERICO label will be attributed by the JERICO Label committee, established in WP9, and emanating from WP1 (observation strategy), WP2 (technology) and WP5 (data management) Label committees The Scientific Label Committee (SLC) comprises representatives from marine research organisations. The SLC encompasses with the WP1 coordination. The Technical Label Committee (TLC) comprises representatives from marine research organisations. The TLC encompasses with the WP2 coordination. The Data Management Committee (DMC) comprises representatives from European organisations and institution involved in data management. The SLC encompasses with the WP5 coordination. Task 2.6: The JERICO Label Technical Committee (M1-M48) OGS, HCMR, HZG, CNR, AZTI, NIVA, Ifremer, SOCIB, CNRS, FMI, IMR, SMHI, SYKE, UPC, DELTARES, CEFAS 5th SC 5th SC 4

39 WP5: OVERVIEW OF TASKS 5.1 Create value for measured data (Task Leader: OGS; other partner involved: HCMR) Activity description: development of common procedures for assigning uncertainties to measured parameters. WP5: DATA MANAGEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION Review and Status Rajesh Nair 1, Loic Petit De La Villeon 2, and Gilbert Maudire 2 1 OGS (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale), Italy 2 IFREMER, France SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels 5.2 Harmonization of delayed-mode data management procedures with SeaDataNet (Task Leader: IFREMER; other partners involved: HCMR, MUMM, OGS) Activity description: development of the JERICO data management framework for delayed-mode data. 5.3 Harmonization of real-time data management procedures with MyOcean/EuroGOOS (Task leader: IFREMER; other partners involved: CNR, NIVA, IMR, HCMR, PUERTO, SMHI) Activity description: development of the JERICO data management framework for dealing with real-time data. SC Meeting, December General Assembly 2014, Brussels. 2 - JERICO - 2 Main achievements since Oslo GA ACHIEVEMENTS: WEAK POINTS One rendered deliverable: D5.4, Guidelines for uncertainty. Work is progressing on D5.5, Report on uncertainty for selected key parameters: temperature, salinity and chlorophyll-a ; D5.6, DM data management handbook, V2 ; D5.7, Second data management report ; D5.8, RT data management handbook, V2. D5.4, Guidelines for uncertainty - Undergoing refinement, and therefore will need a reissue. D5.5, Report on uncertainty for selected key parameters: temperature, salinity and chlorophyll-a - Work is steady, possible slight delay in delivery. D5.6 & D5.8, DM and RT data management handbooks, V2 - Draft prepared, but requires some further work. D5.7, Second data management report - Need for regular updates until the last minute to ensure relevancy of Report. SC Meeting, December 2014, Brussels. WP4 - JERICO - 3 SC Meeting, December 2014, Brussels. WP4 - JERICO - 4 UP COMING OBJECTIVES Delivery of remaining deliverables: D5.5, Report on uncertainty for selected key parameters: temperature, salinity and chlorophyll-a (M44); D5.6, DM data management handbook, V2 (M46); D5.7, Second data management report (M46); D5.8, RT data management handbook, V2 (M46). Thank You Speaker I Organism I adresse mail SC Meeting, December 2014, Brussels. WP4 - JERICO - 5 SC Meeting, December 2014, Brussels. 1

40 WP8: overview of tasks (WP1 - T1.6: User modality Access for the Trans National Activities) : Preparation of the call peer review - Drafting the call - Drafting the guidelines for evaluation - Setting up the Selection Panel - Meeting the Selection Panel WP8: TransNational Access to Coastal Observatories Review and status Stefania Sparnocchia, CNR [email protected] SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels : Information and reporting activities - Implementing the TNA Web Pages - Call and selection reporting: Calls opening, selected projects, access provision plans Access reporting including scientific and technological outcomes achieved WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 2 Main achievement since Oslo GA User projects status Scheduled projects 1st Call nd Call 2013 extra 3rd Call 2013 TOTAL Completed Ongoing* * Completion within 20 December 2014 Completion of most of the User projects 9 project reports submitted in final form + 4 preliminary 1 peer reviewed paper 10 conference presentations/proceedings 1 project was unsuccessful because of equipment failure WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 3 Main achievement since Oslo GA Delivered access Partner Type Access delivered (days) Number of user projects Estimated access costs CNR (IT) FP 1733* ,410 CSIC (ES) GL 169* 3 193,753 HCMR (GR) FP ,583 HCMR (GR) CAL ,582 HZG (DE) FB 144* 1 26,411 HZG (DE) FP ,269 INSU/CNRS (FR) GL ,382 NERC (UK) GL ,144 NIVA (NO) FB ,643 OGS (IT) CAL 5 1 2,521 TOTAL 2690 days 19 projects 463,648 Allocated in the GA: 471,820 WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 4 Main achievement since Oslo GA TNA travel grants Main achievement since Oslo GA 1st Call CIEBIO 2400* GABS 2110* GESEBB 4500 GLISS 1500 MEDACID 6100 o-dgtspocme 7200 OXY-COR 3600 RTC 3200 SESAM 3500 TOT nd Call ECCECs 5750 FITO 3200 MicroLFA METRO 3600 MOSC 4000 RAD 6812 TOT rd Call ABACUS 4200 FRIPP 4200 MAPOM 6100 MUSICS 5240 TOFU 4200 TOT SP meetings: 4044 * RP2 Total Allocated in the GA: 80,000 WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 5 WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 6

41 Achievements: Weak points Achievements: Weak points Communications Data from TNA are provided in varied formats different types: - data from calib exp, - fixed point or sections, - CTD, optical and chemical parameters Link to excell spreadsheet Link to netcdf files Link to compressed (rar) file Link to ASCII file How can we render access to TNA data homogeneous? WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 7 misunderstandigs of TNA rules late or no replies to requests Selection Panel responsibilities not properly shared among lead partners Facility operators JERICO TNA Office Coordinator Users WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 8 UP COMING OBJECTIVES Expected actions: - Completion of all TNA projects, December 2014, reporting January 2015, WHO: TNA user groups - Update of the TNA Webpages before the GA in April 2015, WHO: CNR & BlueLobster & Loic for the data (?) - TNA User workshop (at the GA in April 2015) Delivery of remaining deliverables (CNR): D1.10 Second report of the access activity (due in October 2014 (M42) postponed to March 2015 (M47) to match with User projects timing & MS13) D8.1 Trans National Access Provision (due in April 2015 (M48) anticipated to March 2015 (M47) ) WP8 WP4 -- JERICO - 9

42 WP9 MAIN OBJECTIVES JERICO EUROGOOS WP9: NEW METHODS TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF COASTAL OBSERVING SYSTEMS Nadia Pinardi University of Bologna Centro EuroMediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici WP9 should apply sophisticated data assimilative models and statistical methods to demonstrate the impact of coastal observations in analyses and forecasts Two types of experiments are carried out: 1.Impact of existing observational platforms (OSE) 2.Impact of future observational platforms (OSSE) May 5 to / Oslo / Norway General Assembly 2 - JERICO -2 PARTNERS SYNTHESIS OF WP9 RESULTS CMCC (IT) IFREMER (FR) CNRS (FR) DMI (DK) DELTARES (NL) HCMR (GR) HZG (DE) RBINS-OD (BE) All OSE/OSSE EXPERIMENTS HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE DIFFERENT EUROPEAN SHELF AREAS FROM ALL WP9 PARTNERS SEVERAL PAPERS ALREADY PUBLISHED IN THE LITERATURE TWO CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE JERICO SPECIAL ISSUE (North Sea and Adriatic Sea) WP9 WORKSHOP WAS ORGANIZED IN LISBON, OCTOBER 30-31, 2014 TO DISCUSS FINAL RESULTS AND EXCHANGE WITH OTHER WPs D9.5 AND D9.6 REPORTS ARE BEING PREPARED AND THEY WILL BE DELIVERED ON TIME FOR THE END OF DECEMBER CONTRIBUTION TO D1.11 BEING PREPARED General Assembly 2 - JERICO -3 General Assembly 2 - JERICO -4 1

43 DELIVERABLES: WP10 WP10 Emerging Technologies Deliverable Number D10.1 Lead Beneficiary Estimated indicative person months Dissemination level Delivery date Deliverable title Nature Report on trials and deployment R PU 36 D10.2 Set of software R PU 42 D10.3 Report on data analysis R PU 42 Report on potential new D10.4 sensors 1 30 D PU 42 SC meeting,15-16 dec, 2014 Brussels Total WP4 - JERICO - 2 Main achievement since Oslo GA ACHIEVEMENTS: WEAK POINTS Progress on deliverables 10.1 and (Trials and Deployments) and 10.2 (Imaging software) await some small inputs but are broadly complete Hope to deliver these completely by late Jan 2015 (see word doc) Please specify what is not fully/well achieved, where actions are still needed D 10.3: Data analysis (requires significant input from partners) D10.4: Considerable overlap with Willi s deliverable 3.4 Discussion required on what goes in 10.4 based on what is already in 3.4 WP4 - JERICO - 3 WP4 - JERICO - 4 UP COMING OBJECTIVES Deliverables 10.1 and 10.2 by late January Deliverable 10.3 by late March Deliverable 10.4 by TBC WP4 - JERICO - 5 1

44 D1.11 OBJECTIVES & TIME LINE Objectives of D After JERICO(FP7): next steps? - A roadmap for the future: to fill gaps in observing network & parameters, possible legacies, next R&D challenges - Introduce JERICO-NEXT 5 jan. 31 jan mar. feb. 6 Apr. 27 Apr. (GA) 30 Apr. Specific inputs Review /coord. & WP1 WP review Review / coord. & WP1 Comments & Validation by WPs Comments & Validation in SC Last version and delivery Physical meeting WP4 - JERICO -1 WP4 - JERICO -2 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMENTS /STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT Section 4: what strategy for the future? Should be introduced by a state of the art, after JERICO#1, hightlighting gaps so Section 3: State of the art after JERICO#1 and gaps And Section 2: introduction: scientific and society expectations But it would seprate the strategy for the future from the state of the art and the gaps, not easy to read WP4 - JERICO -3 WP4 - JERICO -4 STATUS OF THE DOCUMENT TODAY STATUS OF THE DOCUMENT TODAY What can be the definition of the coastal area?: introduction 3.1 Sustained coastal monitoring = introduction? Figure: who can provide a coastal scheme? Is IBI example a good idea? NOOS? Figure/table 3.2 Science, society and science for society: introduction? 3.3 From state to variability: characteristics od the coastal seas Not finished, introduction or state of the art after JERICO#1? Should depend of a «minimum scientific strategy» not yet established WP4 - JERICO Marine policy and European directive Is an introduction to MFSD but nothing about JERICO#1 results..; in the Introduction? Or we can discuss about what descriptors JERICO#1 can address and what is missing? 3.5 Monitoring gaps: A synthesis of WP2 + update: Magali, Henning, Pascal: in process Each ROOS to be involved WP9 provide a quantified feedback of the nowaday monitoring systems, and its gaps 3.6 Integrating observation If deals with missing elements of network toward a more integrated one: in 3.5 If a review of the need to integrate different systems: in Introduction WP4 - JERICO -6 1

45 PROPOSED STRUCTURE 1. Introduction 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6 (partly?) 2. R&D to answer science and society needs: status, gaps, and future: 4.2, status after WP10, opening to JERINO NEXT WP1 &3, 3. Monitoring systems: from plateforms to sensors: status, gaps, and future: 3.5 & Data access (3.9) : status, gaps, and future 5. From nowaday National and European strategies to the furure one(s): 3.7, 3.8, 4.3, 4.4, Conclusion: JERICO-NEXT as a step foreward WP4 - JERICO -7 2

46 06/02/2015 Program and Agenda General Assembly in France Brest - April 27-30, 2015 Time table Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 08:30 09:00 Welcome GA Coffee Coffee 09:00 09:20 WP2 Science Day Stakeholders 09:20 09:40 WP3 including: And round tables 09:40 10:00 WP4 TNA presentations 10:00 10:20 WP5 WP9 and WP10 results 10:20 10:40 WP6 10:40 11:00 Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break 11:00 11:20 WP7 Science day: 11:20 11:50 WP1 continuation 11:50 12:20 WP8 12:20 12:50 WP9 13:00 14:00 Lunch Lunch Lunch 14:00 14:30 WP10 Science day Strategy for the 14:30 15:30 WP11 future 15:30 15:50 Coffee Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break 15:50 All members Beginning Science day Preparation Science day Strategy Meeting 19:30 Cocktail Dinner Science Day Objective: to show how JERICO is supporting research and development Presentations: Talk: 15 + Question: 5 (if possible) Including TNA experiments WP9 results WP10 developments Important remarks Separated presentations of TNA experiments are not expected, nor isolated technology (or numerical) developments but Expected: scientific presentation on a scientific question (in a regional/local sea for instance) showing how TNA experiments and/or development helped to answer scientific questions. Please focus on science and be «JERICOintegrative» Should be presentations of results to be submitted in the JERICO special issue See following slides for specific workshops Stakeholders meeting and strategy for the future 5 round tables, 45 min each including a 20 presentation by an invited speaker: Network extension : perspectives after WP9, and proposed actions for the future (should introduce JERICO NEXT corresponding topics amongst others) Technical development needs (should introduce JERICO NEXT corresponding topics amongst others) European Strategy (EC: TNA; Giuseppina Pappalardo: ESFRI; ) MFSD / Policy requirement, societal needs: how JERICO would help? Policy for coastal data at European level: EMODNET (Ian.Shepherd, Jan Bart Calewaert) Strategy for the future: D1.11 presentation and JERICO NEXT WP1 1