2014 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium
|
|
|
- Sharon Clark
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Karen Cheatwood Section Head, System Inventory Reporting and Defense Business Certification 2014 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium System Inventory Reporting and Defense Business Certification 1
2 DHA Vision A joint, integrated, premier system of health, supporting those who serve in the defense of our country. 2
3 Learning Objectives for Defense Business Certification Understand threshold for IT initiatives to be included in the DHP certification request each year Understand by when certification must be obtained Understand consequences of obligating funds prior to receiving DBSMC approval 3
4 Agenda System Inventory Reporting Laws Business Rules DHA System Inventory Process Defense Business Certification Background ADA Violations Problem Statements Timeline 4
5 System Inventory Reporting 5
6 System Inventory Reporting Required by 10 U.S. CODE Information Technology Additional Responsibilities of Chief Information Officers Related data required by various additional laws and regulations FISMA, NDAAs, FMR 6
7 System Inventory Reporting DoD official systems inventory is housed in the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository (DITPR) MHS official systems inventory is housed in the Defense Health Program Systems Inventory Reporting Tool (DHP SIRT) 7
8 Business Rules DITPR Guidance What must be reported All operational IT systems and those in acquisition process Anything that is DIACAP d FMR - Defense Business Systems must align 1:1 to IT Budget 8
9 Business Rules DoD CIO/DCMO DITPR data must be compliant to get DBC Certification DBS Certification data split between DITPR and DITIP but must be able to match up SNaP-IT and DITPR DBS must be in DITPR to be Certified Data fields and information common to SNaP-IT and DITPR must match exactly 9
10 Data Fields that must Match System Name Acronym Description BIN Number Domain/Mission Area Component DITPR ID IT/NSS 10
11 DoD CIO Related Data for Compliance FISMA E-AUTH/PKI Privacy Interoperability Infrastructure Records Management SFIS Lifecycle POCs 11
12 System Inventory Process Flow Request to add Initiative to DHP IT Budget and/or to the DHP SIRT Goes Back to originator with Comments Coordination between DHA IT Budget Team and DHP SIRT Team N Y Comments Resolved Create record in DHP SIRT Approval sent to DHP SIRT Team 12
13 System Inventory Process Flow DHP SIRT team initiates record in DHP SIRT Authorized User Completes Record When Record Passes all Validations, User notifies DHP SIRT team for Upload DHA SMEs review data in record for compliance and sign off Record Uploaded to DITPR in Next Upload 13
14 Defense Business Certification Now that your system is registered in DITPR. We can move on to Defense Business Certification 14
15 Background Defense Business Certification History NDAA 2005 Original requirement to certify Modernization and Development (Mod/Dev) funding >$1 million by the Defense Business System Management Council In 2010 NDAA added the requirement for Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) 15
16 Current Status NDAA 2012 expanded the requirement to certify all Defense Business Systems with total funding >$1 million across the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) DHA Director has been appointed PCA for all DHP Funded DBSs. IRBs submit Organizational Execution Plans for each component within their purview as a complete portfolio to the Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer(ODCMO) for Defense Business Council (DBC)/DBSMC approval MHS is part of P&R Portfolio In 2013 added the requirement that systems requesting Mod/Dev funds >$1M across the FYDP have a DCMO/DBC approved Problem Statement (sections 1-3 of the Business Capability Lifecycle) 16
17 ADA Violations Failure to certify your Defense Business funding prior to obligating your funds results in an Anti-deficiency Act Violation Total funds must be certified across the MHS, not based on each individual instance (e.g., MTF implementation) The ADA violation consequences An officer or employee who violates 31 U.S.C. 1341(a) shall be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including suspension from duty without pay or removal from office In addition, an officer or employee who knowingly and willfully violates the ADA section 1341 shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both 17
18 System Registration and Annual Certification Process System/Initiative Registered in SNAP-IT Registered in DHP SIRT POC Submits Investment Package to DHA DBS Certification Team Pre-Certification Approval Lt Gen Robb DHA DBC Team Prepares Organizational Execution Plan MHS Management Board Performs Internal Review OEP is Submitted to OUSD (P&R) Ms Wright Submitted to ODCMO for DBC Approval DHA receives Investment Decision Memorandum 18
19 Notional Timeline for FY16 OEP Preparation Problem Statements for all Mod/Dev Funding are approved. New Initiatives are Registered in DITIP & Funding included in the FY16 PB Submit 11/5/2014 FY16 Certification Kickoff 11/14/2014 FY16 PB Ex 53 Workbooks Due from Components 01/2015 Problem Statements identified for Mod/Dev over $1M Due January 31, 2015 FY16 Certification Packages DHP SIRT Updated BPR & Required - Objective Evidence Architecture - BCS LROI Spend Plan Brief for Management Board BCL Problem Statement for all systems asking for Dev/Mod over $1M Management Board Briefings Completed April 2015 Package Rework Draft OEP, Brief, Signed PCR to P&R IM 5/2/2015 OEP Submitted for PCA Signature 5/30/2015 OEP Submitted to OUSD(P&R) AND DCMO 6/03/2015 DCMO OEP review Completed 8/31/
20 PROBLEM STATEMENTS Slow and Steady 20
21 Do you need to submit a Problem Statement? Are you requesting to certify $1M or greater of Dev/Mod dollars in the current OEP? Do you have a previously DBCapproved Problem Statement, less than 36 months old, that covers the Enhancements? Yes No Yes No Continue to next question No Problem Statement required for this submission Continue to next question Submit updated Problem Statement for approval 90 days prior to certification package submission Were significant changes made to the previously approved Problem Statement? Yes No Submit updated Problem Statement for approval 90 days prior to certification package submission No New/Updated Problem Statement required for this submission 21
22 Problem Statements Business Capability Lifecycle Request Management MDD Requirements Development A B C Resource Management Execution Management Problem Statement Sections 1-3 $$ 22
23 How does DBS Certification provide value to the MHS? DBS Value Cost Savings. Streamlines health IT driven business costs by helping the Enterprise leverage IT systems while consistently supporting the DoD medical mission. DBS empower business owners, resource managers, and CIOs to prevent spending on non-strategic, redundant or wasteful investments. Visibility into Defense Health Program (DHP) IT Spending. Provides visibility into business operations (sustainment and modernizations) of all IT spending. The information helps MHS leaders make sound and timely decisions about IT spending from a holistic perspective. Regulatory Compliance. Ensures MHS business systems comply with internal and external regulations, 2012 NDAA, BEA, MHS EA compliance, Privacy Act of 1974, HIPAA, and IA requirements. Accountability. Helps MHS leaders review and track progress of investments in effectively executing MHS investment strategies. 23
24 MHS System Inventory Reporting and Defense Business Certification Points of Contact DITIP & SNaP-IT Karen Cheatwood Al Terkhorn System Inventory Lynne Zetterholm Defense Business Certification Karen Cheatwood Carol Fielder Kate Sorensen Briana Hall 24
25 Service s Reach-back Points of Contact Navy Kim Baldwin [email protected] Air Force Patricia Edmond [email protected] Chuck Redmond [email protected] Army Chris Hastedt [email protected] Kat Leard [email protected] Erik Rabe [email protected] 25
26 Learning Objectives Answered Question 1 The threshold for IT initiatives to be included in the DHP certification request each year? A. $1M B. $200K C. >$1 Across the FYDP D. $10M across the FYDP Question 2 Certification must be obtained before what? A. A procurement action can be initiated B. Funds are obligated in support of a Defense Business System/Initiative C. The President s Budget is submitted Question 3 The consequence of obligating funds prior to receiving DBSMC approval results in an Anti-Deficiency Act Violation. True 26
27 Evaluations Please complete your evaluations 27
28 Acronyms ADA: Anti-Deficiency Act BCL: Business Capability Lifecycle BCS: BEA Compliance System BEA: Business Enterprise Architecture BIN: Budget Initiative Number BPR: Business Process Re-engineering CIO: Chief Information Officer DBC: Defense Business Council DBS: Defense Business System DBSMC: Defense Business Systems Management Committee DCMO: DoD Deputy Chief Management Officer DHA: Defense Health Agency DHP: Defense Health Program DHP SIRT: Defense Health Program Systems Inventory Reporting Tool DIACAP: DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process DITIP: DoD Information Technology Investment Portal DITPR: Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository E-AUTH: E-Authentication FISMA: Federal Information Security Management Act 28
29 Acronyms (Continued) FMR: Financial Management Regulation FYDP: Future Years Defense Program HIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act IA: Information Assurance IM: Information Management IRB: Investment Review Board LROI: Life Cycle Return on Investment MHS: Military Health System NDAA: National Defense Authorization Act NSS: National Security System OEP: Organizational Execution Plan OUSD(P&R): Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel & Readiness PB: President s Budget PCA: Pre-Certification Authority PCR: Portfolio Certification Request PKI: Public Key Infrastructure SFIS: Standard Financial Information Structure SME: Subject Matter Expert SNaP-IT: Select and Native Programming Data Input Systems for Information Technology 29
30 Defense Business Certification Title 10 U.S.C. section 2222 CONDITIONS FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR COVERED DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM PROGRAMS. Funds available to the Department of Defense, whether appropriated or non-appropriated, may not be obligated for a defense business system program that will have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title unless the appropriate pre-certification authority for the covered defense business system program has determined that the defense business system program is in compliance with the enterprise architecture developed under subsection (c) and appropriate business process re-engineering efforts have been undertaken to ensure that the business process supported by the defense business system program is or will be as streamlined and efficient as practicable; and the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique requirements or incorporate unique Interfaces has been eliminated the defense business system program is necessary to achieve a critical national security capability or address a critical requirement in an area such as safety or security; or the defense business system program is necessary to prevent a significant adverse effect on a project that is needed to achieve an essential capability, taking into consideration the alternative solutions for preventing such adverse effect; the covered defense business system program has been reviewed and certified by the investment review board established under subsection (g); and (3) the certification of the investment review board under paragraph (2) has been approved by the Defense Business Systems Management Committee established by section 186 of this title. (b) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS IN VIOLATION OF REQUIREMENTS. The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense business system program that has not been certified and approved in accordance with subsection (a) is a Anti-Deficiency Act violation 30
31 Contact Information Karen Cheatwood Section Head (Acting): System Inventory and Defense Business Certification Carol Fielder Program Analyst: Defense Business Certification 31
32 This is Your DHA.. Thank You For All Your Efforts! Medically Ready Force... Ready Medical Force 32
Guidance for Review and Certification of Defense Business Systems
Guidance for Review and Certification of Defense Business Systems Version 3.4 February 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Investment Management Process... 7 3. Governance... 22 4. Investment
Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012
Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance June 2012 Executive Summary Section 901 of the Fiscal Year 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (FY2012 NDAA), now codified at Title 10
1. References and Supporting Information. References, abbreviations, and acronyms used in this Instruction are listed in Attachment 1.
BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER USTRANSCOM INSTRUCTION 90-19 UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND 5 MAY 2015 Command Policy DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS
DoD Business Process Reengineering Assessment Guidance
DoD Business Process Reengineering Assessment Guidance September 28, 2012 Version History Version Publication Date Author Description of Change 1 September 28, 2012 EBI Final Department of Defense Page
DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2014 DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process GAO-14-486 May
Human Resources Management. Portfolio Management Concept of Operations
Human Resources Management Portfolio Management Concept of Operations September 30, 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 Overview... 2 1.1 Background... 2 1.2 Purpose... 2 1.3 Organization of This Document... 2
DoD IT Defense Business Systems Investment Review Process. Guidance. January 2009
DoD IT Defense Business Systems Investment Review Process January 2009 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3 2.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE...4 3.0 CONTENT CHANGES...4 4.0 KEY CONCEPTS...5 4.1 DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM...5
Department of Defense End-to-End Business Process Integration Framework
Department of Defense End-to-End Business Process Integration Framework May 17, 2013 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 3 2 End-to-End Business Processes... 6 3 Applying the End-to-End Framework to the DoD
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1400.25, Volume 1100 January 3, 2014 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: DoD Civilian Personnel Management System: Civilian Human Resources Management Information Technology Portfolio
DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION. Additional Action Needed to Achieve Intended Outcomes
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2015 DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION Additional Action Needed to Achieve Intended Outcomes GAO-15-627 July 2015
Report No. DODIG-2015-010. U.S. Department of Defense OCTOBER 28, 2014
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-010 OCTOBER 28, 2014 Defense Logistics Agency Did Not Fully Implement the Business Enterprise Architecture Procure to Pay Business Process
Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before
Statement of Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation Before THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT)
DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-038 DECEMBER 28, 2015 DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals
Report No. DODIG-2012-111 July 13, 2012 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Additional Copies To obtain additional
Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System Does Not Comply With the Standard Financial Information Structure and U.S. Government Standard General Ledger
DODIG-2012-051 February 13, 2012 Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System Does Not Comply With the Standard Financial Information Structure and U.S. Government Standard General Ledger Additional Copies
DoD CIO ITSM Overview Enterprise Architecture Conference
DoD CIO ITSM Overview Enterprise Architecture Conference April 14, 2011 Barbara McCain Enterprise Architecture & Infrastructure DoD CIO [email protected] What is IT Service Management (ITSM)? ITSM
APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS
APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS Section 5123 of the Clinger-Cohen Act requires that the Department establish goals for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of agency operations
Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG 2015 008 OCTOBER 23, 2014 Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 3: FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996 COMPLIANCE, EVALUATION, AND REPORTING SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES
VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 3: FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996 COMPLIANCE, EVALUATION, AND REPORTING SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are
Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide
Department of Homeland Security Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide Version 4.0 May 2007 Prepared by the Office of the Chief Information Officer Document Version History Document Version Version
Financial Management
January 6, 2006 Financial Management Report on Army Management of the Army Game Project Funding (D-2006-043) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Constitution of the United States A Regular
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Health Program Date: March 2014 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY
Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations
Report No. DODIG-2013-111 I nspec tor Ge ne ral Department of Defense AUGUST 1, 2013 Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior s I N T
Turning Portfolio Management into Decisions
Turning Portfolio Management into Decisions Elliot Chikofsky 2006 EM&I - distributed by SSTC 2006 by permission 2006 ENGINEERING, MANAGEMENT & INTEGRATION, INC. 455 Spring Park Pl.Ste.350 Herndon, VA 20170-4727
DoD Business Process Reengineering CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT
DoD Business Process Reengineering CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (Installations & Environment) Business Enterprise Integration Directorate
NOV. 2 2 2q11. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C. 20301-6000
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C. 20301-6000 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER NOV 2 2 2q11 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
Defining a Secure Mobile Framework Architecture at DHA
Ms. Janine Oakley, Transition Manager Innovation and Advanced Technology Development Division 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Defining a Secure Mobile Framework Architecture at DHA
DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL TN: DT-07-08 To: Subject: Purpose: Office and Division of Origin: NRC Management Directives Custodians Transmittal of Management Directive 2.8,
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3204.01 August 20, 2014 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Policy for Oversight of Independent Research and Development (IR&D) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This
DODIG-2013-105 July 18, 2013. Navy Did Not Develop Processes in the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System to Account for Military Equipment Assets
DODIG-2013-105 July 18, 2013 Navy Did Not Develop Processes in the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System to Account for Military Equipment Assets Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this
Department of Defense MANUAL. Procedures for Ensuring the Accessibility of Electronic and Information Technology (E&IT) Procured by DoD Organizations
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 8400.01-M June 3, 2011 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Procedures for Ensuring the Accessibility of Electronic and Information Technology (E&IT) Procured by DoD Organizations
Management of Army Business Operations
Army Regulation 5 1 Management Management of Army Business Operations Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 12 November 2015 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 5 1 Management of Army Business
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8115.01 October 10, 2005 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Information Technology Portfolio Management References: (a) Subtitle III of title 40, United States Code (formerly
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8440.01 December 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Information Technology (IT) Service Management (ITSM) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. Pursuant to the authority
DoD 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 2B, Chapter 18 * September 2015
VOLUME 2B, CHAPTER 18: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (INCLUDING CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS) SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES TO All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by an * symbol preceding
(a) In General.--(1) Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before section 2223 the following new section:
SEC. 332. DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE, SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CONDITIONS FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM MODERNIZATION. (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 131 of title 10,
Department of the Navy ebusiness Operations Office
ebus iness Innovation DON Card Management www.don-ebusiness.navsup.navy.mil Department of the Navy ebusiness Operations Office Presented by: Ms. Karen Meloy Deputy Commander, DON ebusiness Operations Office
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6440.02 May 29, 2014 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Program (CLIP) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. Reissues DoD
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8910.01 May 19, 2014 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Information Collection and Reporting References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. Reissues DoD Instruction
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.03 November 4, 2015 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Unique Identification (UID) Standards for Supporting DoD Net-Centric Operations References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE 6510 VA IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE 6510 Washington, DC 20420 Transmittal Sheet VA IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: This Directive defines the policy and responsibilities to
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02 (Reference (a)), this Instruction:
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6430.02 August 17, 2011 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Defense Medical Materiel Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02
Enterprise Scheduling Platform: The Pathway to Improving IT Integration
Ms. Nora Crossan Acting Chief, Enterprise Scheduling Solution Delivery Division 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Enterprise Scheduling Platform: The Pathway to Improving IT Integration
Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview
Information Resources Management College Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview Dr. Stan Boddie & Prof. Matt Newman 1 a global learning community for government s most promising information
How To Manage A Defense Department Budget
DoD 7000.14 - R DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION VOLUME 1: GENERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION, SYSTEMS AND REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) 2BDoD 7000.14-R
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5400.16 July 14, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. In accordance with
U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid
U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid Lifecycle Management Methodology Stage Gate Review Process Description Version 1.3 06/30/2015 Final DOCUMENT NUMBER: FSA_TOQA_PROC_STGRW.NA_001 Lifecycle
2. APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1000.25 July 19, 2004 Certified Current as of April 23, 2007 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: DoD Personnel Identity Protection (PIP) Program References: (a) DoD Directive 1000.22,
Acquisition Decision Memorandum for the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System
Report No. D-2010-041 February 5, 2010 Acquisition Decision Memorandum for the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System SPECIAL WARNING This report contains DoD Planning, Programming, and Budget
Risk Management Framework (RMF): The Future of DoD Cyber Security is Here
Risk Management Framework (RMF): The Future of DoD Cyber Security is Here Authors: Rebecca Onuskanich William Peterson 3300 N Fairfax Drive, Suite 308 Arlington, VA 22201 Phone: 571-481-9300 Fax: 202-315-3003
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8140.01 August 11, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Cyberspace Workforce Management References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive: a. Reissues and renumbers DoD Directive
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 33-4 17 JANUARY 2013 Communications and Information INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
Department of Administration Portfolio Management System 1.3 June 30, 2010
E 06/ 30/ 2010 EX AM PL 1. 3 06/ 28/ 2010 06/ 24/ 2010 06/ 23/ 2010 06/ 15/ 2010 06/ 18/ 2010 Portfolio System 1.3 June 30, 2010 Contents Section 1. Project Overview... 1 1.1 Project Description... 1 1.2
Overview. FedRAMP CONOPS
Concept of Operations (CONOPS) Version 1.0 February 7, 2012 Overview Cloud computing technology allows the Federal Government to address demand from citizens for better, faster services and to save resources,
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Surgery Scheduling System (S3) Defense Health Agency (DHA) SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of Defense (DoD) information system or electronic
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5144.02 November 21, 2014 DCMO SUBJECT: DoD Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO) References: See Enclosure 1. PURPOSE. Under the authority vested in the Secretary
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.05 August 18, 2011 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Electromagnetic Spectrum Data Sharing References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
Report No. D-2009-097 July 30, 2009. Data Migration Strategy and Information Assurance for the Business Enterprise Information Services
Report No. D-2009-097 July 30, 2009 Data Migration Strategy and Information Assurance for the Business Enterprise Information Services Additional Information and Copies To obtain additional copies of this
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Enterprise Laboratory Information Management System (ELIMS) US Army Medical Command - DHP Funded System SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of
The HIPAA Security Rule: Theory and Practice
Presentation for HIPAA Summit X Baltimore, MD April 7, 2005 The HIPAA Security Rule: Theory and Practice Sam Jenkins Privacy Officer TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) Dan Steinberg Senior Consultant Booz
Office of Audits and Evaluations Report No. AUD-13-007. The FDIC s Controls over Business Unit- Led Application Development Activities
Office of Audits and Evaluations Report No. AUD-13-007 The FDIC s Controls over Business Unit- Led Application Development Activities September 2013 Executive Summary The FDIC s Controls over Business
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6000.08 January 22, 2014 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Defense Health Program Research and Clinical Investigation Programs References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction:
DISTRIBUTION: ASSISTANT G-1 FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL POLICY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DIRECTOR, PLANS, PROGRAMS, AND DIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DISTRIBUTION: ASSISTANT G-1 FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL POLICY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DIRECTOR, PLANS, PROGRAMS, AND DIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PERSONNEL FORCE MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT
Review of the Total Information Technology Operations Cost for the Pentagon Reservation and National Capital Region
Review of the Total Information Technology Operations Cost for the Pentagon Reservation and National Capital Region Response to the Deputy Secretary of Defense (DSD) Memo subject Review of the Total Costs
Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program
COL John R. Bailey, Deputy Program Manager 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program 1 DHA Vision A joint, integrated, premier system of
DoD CIO s 10-Point Plan for IT Modernization. Ms. Teri Takai DoD CIO
DoD CIO s 10-Point Plan for IT Modernization Ms. Teri Takai DoD CIO Executive Summary Proactive Partnerships for IT Modernization IT Modernization Strategy Consolidate Infrastructure Streamline Processes
The DoD Information Enterprise Strategic Plan and Roadmap (SP&R)
The DoD Information Enterprise Strategic Plan and Roadmap (SP&R) A collaborative planning approach for the Information Enterprise Jun 1-4, 2009 Lloyd Thrower [email protected] DoD CIO Strategic Planning
Subj: DEFENSE MEDICAL HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM INTERNET
^ ^T (ir DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372.5300 I N REPLY REr To BUMED-M 1 BUMED INSTRUCTION 5312.3 From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surge ry
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Diabetes Health Management System (CoPilot ) US Army Medical Command - DHP Funded Application SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of Defense (DoD)
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION Directive Current as of 19 November 2014 J-8 CJCSI 8410.02 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, JS-LAN WARFIGHTING MISSION AREA (WMA) PRINCIPAL ACCREDITING AUTHORITY
DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
An Operational Architecture for Federated Identity Management
An Operational Architecture for Federated Identity Management March 2011 Implementing federated identity management and assurance in operational scenarios Federated Identity Solution The Federated identity
Determination of Best Procurement Approach. Assisted Acquisition. [Insert title of the statement of work or requirement.]
Determination of Best Procurement Approach Assisted Acquisition Title of Effort: [Insert title of the statement of work or requirement.] Requesting Agency: [Insert name of the requirements office.] Requirements
014-00-01-01-01-1146-00. Mixed Life Cycle FY2002
Consolidated American System (CAPPS) and Interagency e Migration Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All Capital Assets) I.A. Overview 1. Date of Submission: 2. Agency: Department
I. Purpose - 1 - MD # 0007.1
Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 0007.1 Issue Date: 03/15/2007 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT I. Purpose A. This Management Directive (MD) establishes
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5105.77 October 30, 2015 DCMO SUBJECT: National Guard Bureau (NGB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense
Audit of the Transfer of DoD Service Treatment Records to the Department of Veterans Affairs
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2014-097 JULY 31, 2014 Audit of the Transfer of DoD Service Treatment Records to the Department of Veterans Affairs INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Implementation of Agile SCRUM Software Development Methodology
Mr. Christopher Harrington, PM Clinical Support, Solution Delivery Division Mr. James Huber, Healthcare Data Analyst, DHA Decision Support 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Implementation
Information Technology Governance Overview and Charter
Information Technology Governance Overview and Charter Prepared by: Project #: Date submitted Document version: IT Governance Charter v03.05.2012 1.0 48.0 - Page 1 of 34 Document History Version Date Author
Significant Revisions to OMB Circular A-127. Section Revision to A-127 Purpose of Revision Section 1. Purpose
Significant Revisions to OMB Circular A-127 Section Revision to A-127 Purpose of Revision Section 1. Purpose Section 5. Definitions Section 6. Policy Section 7. Service Provider Requirements Section 8.
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5400.16 February 12, 2009 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
Defense Healthcare Management Systems
Defense Healthcare Management Systems Recovering Warrior Task Force Interagency Program Office (IPO) Review Mr. Christopher Miller 28 January 2014 1 Agenda Topic Introduction Program Executive Office (PEO)
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM TASK GROUP
Report to the Secretary of Defense BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM TASK GROUP Report FY05-2 Recommendations on Realignment of Business Management Modernization Program (BMMP) Defense Business
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5010.40 May 30, 2013 USD(C)/CFO SUBJECT: Managers Internal Control Program Procedures References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. Reissues DoD
DoD Business Priorities
DoD Business Priorities Accelerating Change and Creating Agility in Tough Financial Times MR. DAVID M. WENNERGREN DoD Assistant Deputy Chief Management Officer THE WORLD HAS CHANGED Dave s Top 10 List
GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees March 2013 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5545.04 April 7, 2011 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Policy on the Congressional Reporting Process for Military Educational Institutions Seeking to Establish, Modify, or Redesignate
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS Guidelines & Instructions for Maryland State Agencies Revised Two Step PPR/PIR Approval Process Fiscal Year 2013 Table of Contents Part 1: Overview... 2 1.1 Introduction...
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Assistance Reporting Tool (ART) Defense Health Agency (DHA) SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of Defense (DoD) information system or electronic
Report No. D2008-041 January 14, 2008. Management of the General Fund Enterprise Business System
Report No. D2008-041 January 14, 2008 Management of the General Fund Enterprise Business System Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 7750.07 October 10, 2014 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Forms Management Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. Reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI)
U.S. Department of Education. Office of the Chief Information Officer
U.S. Department of Education Office of the Chief Information Officer Investment Review Board (IRB) CHARTER January 23, 2013 I. ESTABLISHMENT The Investment Review Board (IRB) is the highest level IT investment
