Case Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall

Transcription

1 NCC Construction Ltd Matti Aho Profit Unit Director Case Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall

2 NCC s BOT projects Arlanda rail link, Sweden Motorway A2, Poland District heating plant, Skurup, Sweden Kallax airport, Sweden SEK 5 billion SEK 2.7 billion SEK 40 million shareholder Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, games hall and swimming pool

3 Kuninkaantie upper secondary school The first public-private partnership project in Finland. Espoo: purchases maintenance and user services from the project companies pays only for the services produced partnership model 28 years, service contract 25 years the goal is to pass the optimal number of risks associated with the project from the city to the private service providers Service production began in autumn 2003.

4 NCC Construction Finland Ltd NCC s role - leading the project team - optimising life-cycle costs (LCC) - environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) - construction - fittings, educational equipment - maintenance

5 ABB Oy Building services and facilities management turnkey supplier of services and systems related to building services throughout the building s life cycle ABB s facilities management guarantee high-quality building maintenance and facilities services that are efficient in terms of total costs

6 Sodexho s services high-quality restaurant services for the pupils, staff and outsiders lobby services in the main lobby swimming pool lobby and café services lifeguard s services opening and locking the games hall s doors attendant services sanitation services

7 Services at Kuninkaantie upper secondary school BUILDING MAINTENANCE tending and maintaining the grounds cleaning and waste disposal security services managerial and building management services repair and maintenance of buildings OTHER SERVICES restaurant services attendant and mailing services fittings and educational equipment ICT services swimming pool and games hall operating services external sources of income general emergencies

8 Agreements for Kuninkaantie upper secondary school Sharehold ers NCC Finland Oy Sodexho Oy ABB Oy Shareholder agreement Service agreement City of Espoo Project company ARANDUR Oy Subsupplier agreements Subsupplier s NCC, Sodexho, ABB, Fujitsu Invia, Elisa Communications Land-lease agreement Agreement on purchase option Lease agreement/ payment of rent Construction commission agreement Finance company ABB Credit Oy Contract agreements Contractors NCC ja ABB Subcontractor s

9 Private finance in public projects New construction projects FINANCIAL BACKET NCC FINLAND OY, ABB OY Design Procurement Contracting PROJECT COMPANY Arandur Operating liability Commission Delivery EUR SERVICE CHARGE 1 / VARIABLE SERVICE CHARGE SERVICE CHARGE 2 / FIXED SERVICE CHARGE Construction-period finance The client approves the perfomance and the lease period begins

10 Risk-sharing in Kuninkaantie upper secondary school Espoo inflation customers; the pupils changes in legislation force majeure official charges; land-lease, municipal taxation, etc functional renovations Project company technical condition; maintenance and renovations quality and quantity of services; sanctions quantities consumed economic cycles availability

11 Solutions/ products Use of eco-assessment calculation in choice of materials Steel pools (Swedish Invarmex) Econet-LTO system (efficiency, moisture control) Heat recovery for shower water Kitchen machinery energy aspect Advanced waste sorting and recycling Integrated ticket sales, cashier and gate system for swimming pool Real-time monitoring and running via the internet of the building automation system

12 Example LTO, improved Lower life- U-value for windowscycle costs Social benefits comparison case Eco-assessment calculation Difference LCA 9,992 8,354 kwh/htm 2 LCA -16.4% LCC 29,966 29,656 SEK/htm 2 LCC -1.0% INV 19,157 19,170 SEK/htm 2 INV 0.1% During 25 years -7,371 MWh -4 MSEK MSEK Changes in the Kuninkaantie upper secondary school project: better windows (u-value) heat recovery systems Result: insignificant increase in capital cost substantial improvement in energy expenses substantial decrease in environmental impacts

13 Kuninkaantien Partnership with trust