Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 4d Self
|
|
- Brenda Benson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 4d Self
2 Reid s critique Thomas Reid (p ) made a famous criticism of Locke s view with a thought experiment about an officer in the military. Essentially he asked us to imagine this man at three different times in his life: as a young boy, as a military officer, and as an old general. Call these times A, B, and C respectively. Reid asks us to imagine the following things to be true of A, B, and C A: The boy is flogged at school. B: The officer captures the enemy s flag in battle. At this time, he can still remember when he was flogged in school. C: The old general still remembers capturing the flag, but has no memory of the flogging. Reid points out that Locke s view implies that A=B and B=C, but A C. This is a problem because it violates the transitivity of identity.
3 Locke s defense Reid s criticism seems crushing, but there is a fairly simple response to it. Locke can point out that in the real world (as opposed to the purely mathematical one) whether a thing is the same over a certain period of time is going to be a matter of convention. To explain this point Blackburn asks us to imagine a law that gives Theseus a tax break on his ship as long as it remains physically identical to the one he bought. The government decides that the ship is the same at two different points in time A and B, just in case 55% of the physical material is the same.
4 Personhood as a forensic notion This criterion will also fail transitivity. Suppose: A= newly purchased ship. B= 10 years old, 40% of original material replaced. C= 15 years old, 60% of original material replaced. So again, A = B, B = C, but A C. But Blackburn s point is: who cares? This is not really a mathematical or metaphysical identity, it is just identity for practical legal purposes. Locke s theory of identity has the same defense. It is identity for practical/moral purposes, not mathematical or scientific purposes.
5 Blackburn s defense of Locke s concept of personhood implies that A. there is really no way to determine whether someone is the same person over time. B. no human could possibly be the same person over time. C. most humans are many different persons at the same time. D. whether we regard a human being as the same person over time is more of a practical matter than a scientific one.
6 Hume s bundle theory of the self As we saw earlier, Hume argued that the self, considered as a simple entity that owns perceptions and experiences is unobservable, and that we should be skeptical of it s existence. It is often said that Hume subscribed to a different view of the self, namely that it is not the owner of our perceptions, but simply the collection or bundle of perceptions itself. That s one way of putting Hume s view. The other way of putting it, perhaps more charitable, is that Hume didn t believe in a self at all.
7 Kant s critique of Hume The main problem with Hume s view is that it is very difficult for us to make sense of perceptions that don t have an owner. As Blackburn points out, imagining a perception without a perceiver is like trying to imagine a dent without a surface, or a smile without a face. Kant puts the point this way. Hume is right that the self is unobservable, and right to reject the self as a simple, immaterial entity that collects experiences in some way that is completely beyond empirical examination.
8 Where Hume goes wrong But Kant thinks Hume is wrong to conclude that the term I could only refer to a particular bundle of perceptions. The bundle view does not account for the fact that we do not experience the world as a jumble of perceptions, but rather as a highly unified and integrated set of experiences from a particular point of view. Just think about what is happening, for example, when you pick up your pen and look at it. You aren t just having a bundle of tactile perceptions and visual perceptions. Rather, your tactile perceptions and your visual perceptions are exquisitely integrated to give you the information that you are holding the pen.
9 The rubber hand illusion An interesting way to appreciate what the brain does along these lines is to look at how it can be tricked. Take a look at the rubber hand illusion, for example. jg0ru
10 The self as an organizing principle 1 One way to see what Kant is saying is to adopt what we now sometimes call the design stance. What would it be like to design a robot that had some minimal form of self-consciousness? Focusing on visual experience, Blackburn imagines a robot fitted with a camera. The robot can record visual images on a screen, and in this sense a bundle of perceptions is present. But these perceptions are not of any real use to the robot at this point, because it has no way of knowing what it is looking at.
11 The self as an organizing principle 2 For example, if a round shape is moving across the screen, the robot does not know whether it is looking at something small moving slowly nearby, or something larger moving more quickly far away, or even whether the shape itself is moving, rather that the robot. The point here is that the bundle of perceptions is not at all useful to the robot unless it has a set of rules for interpreting their significance with respect to it.
12 The self as an organizing principle 3 In other words, ideas like near, distant, left, right, above, below, before, behind, big, little, fast, slow, etc. all express relations to a particular observer. These relations express the observer s point of view, and they need to be determined in order for the observer to know how to respond appropriately to it s perceptions. So Kant s idea is that anytime we refer to an I we are not referring to some kind of immaterial substance, or anything we could discover in experience, but rather to the set of principles by which we interpret these experiences from a particular perspective. Notice that this does not necessarily mean that we are aware of having that perspective. This would occur at an even higher level in which the organizing principle allows for imagining the perspective of others.
13 From a Kantian point of view, for a robot to have a self it would minimally need an organizing principle that provided it with A. conscious thoughts. B. conscious feelings. C. a perspective. D. the ability to reflect on its own thoughts and feelings and perspective.
14 Kant was critical of Hume s bundle theory of perception because it fails to recognize that our perceptions A. have many different qualities besides mere bundleness. B. are better known than our feelings. C. are integrated from a particular perspective. D. are not organized.
15 Other points of view If a simple robot like the one described is outfitted with a set of organizing principles it will have a point of view, though it won t actually know it has a point of view; i.e., it will have a self, but it won t actually be self-conscious. Self-consciousness is partly the recognition that our own point of view can be different from others; because of your particular circumstances you perceive an environment we both occupy differently that I do. Blackburn suggests that it is this ability to look at things from another person s point of view that gives rise to certain delusions, such as that we might survive bodily death.
16 Delusions For example, because you can imagine different points of view, you have the capacity to imagine what it would be like to be at your own funeral. You can imagine seeing your body in a coffin, and it is very natural to describe this activity as your self seeing your body in a coffin. Similarly you can imagine living in a different place or time, which you naturally describe as imagining your self living at a different place or time. Blackburn s point here is just that imagining your self doing this or that is an expression that shouldn t be taken too literally. All you are doing is recognizing the existence of points of view besides your own.
17 Blackburn thinks that our ability to imagine points of view besides our own makes it very likely that an immaterial self exists and that we could be reincarnated at a different place and time. A. True B. False
18 God The next chapter examines arguments for and against the existence of God. Blackburn takes seriously the idea that religious people have beliefs that are meant to be evaluated in terms of their truth and falsity. For instance, he assumes that people who believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ believe this in a literal sense, not just in some metaphorical or literary sense.
19 The ontological argument This chapter begins with an examination of what is known as the ontological argument for the existence of God, which was developed by St. Anselm around 1050 A.D. The ontological argument is an attempt to provide an absolute proof of the existence of God. Descartes employs a version of the proof in his Meditations. Today the argument is primarily of historical interest, though it is also a very useful tool for exposing the defects of rationalism, the view that genuine knowledge must come from reason alone.
20 The basic idea of the ontological proof The ontological proof is seductive, but deeply flawed in ways that Blackburn explains very clearly. In this class we won t spend time with the details of the proof. But the basic idea is quite simple. Anselm essentially claims that it is part of God s very nature to exist. Usually this claim is expressed as follows: God s essence implies God s existence.
21 The greatest conceivable being Anselm s proof begins with the claim that God is, by definition, the greatest conceivable being. He then claims that a being that exists is greater than a being that doesn t exist. Hence it follows that if something really is the greatest conceivable being it necessarily exists.
22 Gaunilo s refutation Probably the best refutation of the ontological argument was provided by a contemporary of Anselm, a monk named Gaunilo. Gaunilo simply pointed out that if Anselm were permitted to argue in this way then he could prove the existence of the most perfect anything. For example, the greatest conceivable beer would also have to exist, since existing is one of the properties it would have to have in order to be the greatest.
23 Hume s critique One of the mistakes that Anselm and Descartes make in the ontological proof is in thinking that a thing s existence can be a matter of logical necessity. As Hume, Kant, and many other philosophers have argued since then, whether a being exists is a contingent, empirical matter, and this can only be established by experience. This is the point of Blackburn s Dreamboat analogy. You can not bring your perfect lover into existence simply by defining him or her as something that exists. The same holds true of God.
24 According to the ontological argument A. God is the greatest conceivable being. B. A being that exists is greater than one that doesn t. C. The greatest conceivable being necessarily exists. D. All of the above.
25 The cosmological argument The cosmological argument is another argument for the existence of God. It was formulated by Aristotle (who did not himself believe in a personal god) and reformulated within the Christian tradition by the St. Thomas Aquinas. The cosmological argument is a rationalist argument in that it is ultimately based on the meanings of certain terms, not observation of the world. Unlike the ontological argument, however, it is not primarily based on the meaning of the term God. Rather, it is based on the meaning of the term cause.
26 The cosmological argument: simple version. The basic idea behind the cosmological argument is that everything that exists, does so either contingently or necessarily. Something exists contingently if it is caused by (or contingent upon) something else. Something exists necessarily if it is impossible for it not to exist, and impossible for it to be caused or brought into being by something else. The simplest version of the cosmological argument assert sthat while physical events are clearly contingent, this chain of contingent causes can not extent back infinitely in time; at some point we must arrive at a first cause, which by definition would have to be a necessarily existing thing. It then asserts that this necessarily existing thing is God.
27 Problems with the simple version There are two main problems with this version of the cosmological argument. First, how do we know that a chain of causation can not extend infinitely back into the past? It is hard to grasp, but there is no obvious logical absurdity in assuming that it does. Second, supposing that the idea of a necessarily existing thing makes sense, what reason could we have for thinking that such a thing could be a being with the kinds of qualities we normally attribute to God?
28 Subtler version of cosmological argument A subtler version of the cosmological argument does not rely on the rejection of an infinite past. It asserts that even if we allow that the chain of contingent causes is infinite in both directions (past and future) it still makes sense to ask what causes the entire chain of causes to come into existence. The idea here is that contingent causes occur within space and time. But when we ask where space and time itself came from, the answer can only be in terms of something that exists necessarily. possibly infinite chain of contingent causes
29 Problems with the subtle version This version of the cosmological argument is still beset by the following difficulties: Given that we accept the existence of something that exists necessarily, how do we know that the universe itself is not such a thing? How do we know that there can not be an infinite chain of contingent causes of the universe itself? Does the idea of something that exists necessarily even make sense?
30 The argument to design The design argument to the existence of God is distinct from both the ontological and the cosmological arguments in that it proceeds from experience. The design argument does not attempt to prove God s existence with certainty. Rather, it hypothesizes God s existence in an attempt to explain a certain kind of observation. The observation in question is that the universe is not chaotic, but rather highly ordered. The design argument seeks an explanation of this fact. The proposed explanation of the observed order in the universe is that the universe has designer, i.e., God.
31 Necessary existence redux Both Hume and Kant reject the idea of a necessarily existing entity on empiricist grounds, agreeing that existence is a factual matter, not a logical or conceptual one. Whatever we may conceive of as existing, said Hume, we may also conceive of as not existing. Kant, in particular, argued that the idea of a necessarily existing thing is just a confusion. Given that a certain kind of thing exists, certain truths about it are contingent and certain truths are necessary. For example, given that a spherical object exists, it may only be contingently true that it is bouncy, but it is necessarily true that it s surface area is 4πr 2. But it is wrong to infer from the existence of necessary truths about certain kinds of things, that there must be certain kinds of things whose existence is necessary.
32 Analogical nature of design argument The argument in favor of the design hypothesis is analogical in nature. The basic claim is that the order we observe in the universe is just like the order we observe in a well-designed manmade object, such as a watch. It is logically possible, but still incredibly unlikely, that something with the internal complexity of a watch could come into existence by a succession of ordinary physical interactions. The best explanation seems to be that the watch is creation of an intelligent being. Hence, if the universe displays the same kind of order as a watch, then we are justified in explaining it s existence in the same way.
33 The argument to design formalized Here is one way of formalizing the design argument. 1. The universe is like a machine in that it displays a high degree of order. 2. The ordered nature of machines is due to the fact that they were designed by someone. 3. Therefore, the ordered of the universe is due to the fact that it was designed by someone.
34 General problems with analogical argument 1 The main problem with the design argument stems from the problematic nature of analogical argument itself. The problem is that just about any two things in the universe are similar in some respect, but this similarity is rarely if ever sufficient to justify the conclusion that they must be similar in some other as yet unobserved respect as well. Here, for example, is an argument with the same logical structure as the design argument: 1. A human is like a chimpanzee in that they share almost identical DNA. 2. As a result of their DNA, humans are capable of advanced mathematics. 3. Therefore, chimpanzees are capable of advanced mathematics.
35 General problems with analogical argument 2 The point is not that the chimp argument is absurd. The similarity of our DNA may actually be a good reason for wondering whether chimps could understand mathematics. Rather, the point is that this argument is only successful in suggesting an interesting possibility, one that would have to be tested by further inquiry into the cognitive abilities of chimps. Unfortunately, there is just no way to do this with the design argument. The claim that a watch was designed can be tested: we can ask to see the designer and the plans she followed. But the claim that universe was designed cannot be tested in the same way. Neither the designer nor the plans can be revealed to us without violating the assumption that the designer and his plans are somehow external to the universe itself. Hence, as far as corroboration is concerned, the analogical argument can be nothing more than an interesting idea.
36 Specific problems with the design argument. The design argument has some specific problems as well. 1. Although the order of universe is similar to that of a machine, it is also similar to that of an animal. Animals arise from a process of cellular replication, so it seems at least as plausible to suggest that the universe arises from this kind of process as well. 2. Complex designed objects like spaceships have many designers, not one. So even if we allow that the universe is designed, we have no reason to think that the universe had only one designer. 3. In our experience, intelligence is always the result of the activity of a brain, which is a physical thing. Hence the design argument would seems to entail the view that the designer of the universe itself has a brain, meaning that the designer of the universe is itself a physical being.
37 The problem of evil 1 Much philosophy of religion focuses on the following question. Why does God permit evil? The attempt to answer this question is known as Theodicy. The question arises because monotheistic traditions conceive of God as having three properties: omniscience, omnipotence, and omni-benevolence. The question, then, is how an all-knowing, all-loving, and allpowerful creator can permit widespread human suffering. This is a very large subject and Blackburn deals with it fairly narrowly, in terms of the design argument alone. The question he poses is whether a person who is truly aware of the incredible degree of human suffering that exists in the world would ever hypothesize that the universe was created by a being with the properties noted above.
38 The problem of evil 2 Classical Theodicy is the attempt to show that God s existence is logically possible given the amount of suffering in the universe. Many scenario have been imagined that would make sense of this world being the best of all possible worlds. The problem is that classical Theodicy is only of interest to someone who already believe in God. In the absence of any prior belief in God s existence, the amount of suffering in the world is actually very compelling evidence that that God lacks one of the properties noted above. For example, God may simply be an extremely powerful being, but not an omnipotent one. Hence, while he loves us and knows that we suffer, he can only do so much to prevent it without eliminating the universe as a whole.
Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke
Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke [Modified Fall 2009] 1. Large class of arguments. Sometimes they get very complex, as in Clarke s argument, but the basic idea is simple. Lets
More information1/9. Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas
1/9 Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas This week we are going to begin looking at a new area by turning our attention to the work of John Locke, who is probably the most famous English philosopher of all
More informationReality in the Eyes of Descartes and Berkeley. By: Nada Shokry 5/21/2013 AUC - Philosophy
Reality in the Eyes of Descartes and Berkeley By: Nada Shokry 5/21/2013 AUC - Philosophy Shokry, 2 One person's craziness is another person's reality. Tim Burton This quote best describes what one finds
More informationNECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS
Michael Lacewing Personal identity: Physical and psychological continuity theories A FIRST DISTINCTION In order to understand what is at issue in personal identity, it is important to distinguish between
More informationDescartes Meditations. ? God exists I exist (as a thinking thing)
Descartes Meditations Descartes Structure of Belief What does he know with absolute certainty?? God exists I exist (as a thinking thing) Why try to prove God exists? Intellectual interest. : Are any of
More informationLast time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way:
Aquinas Third Way Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way: 1. 2. 3. 4. At least one thing has an efficient cause. Every causal chain must either be circular,
More informationPhilosophical argument
Michael Lacewing Philosophical argument At the heart of philosophy is philosophical argument. Arguments are different from assertions. Assertions are simply stated; arguments always involve giving reasons.
More informationYou will by now not be surprised that a version of the teleological argument can be found in the writings of Thomas Aquinas.
The design argument The different versions of the cosmological argument we discussed over the last few weeks were arguments for the existence of God based on extremely abstract and general features of
More informationKant on Time. Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004
Kant on Time Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004 In the Transcendental Aesthetic of his Critique of Pure Reason, Immanuel Kant offers a series of dense arguments
More informationDivine command theory
Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the semester, and the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory
More informationRead this syllabus very carefully. If there are any reasons why you cannot comply with what I am requiring, then talk with me about this at once.
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING PHIL 2020 Maymester Term, 2010 Daily, 9:30-12:15 Peabody Hall, room 105 Text: LOGIC AND RATIONAL THOUGHT by Frank R. Harrison, III Professor: Frank R. Harrison, III Office:
More informationResponding to Arguments against the Existence of God Based on Evil
Responding to Arguments against the Existence of God Based on Evil By INTRODUCTION Throughout the history of western thought, numerous philosophers and great thinkers have struggled with what is known
More informationLocke s psychological theory of personal identity
Locke s psychological theory of personal identity phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 3, 2006 1 Identity, diversity, and kinds............................. 1 2 Personal identity...................................
More informationSome key arguments from Meditations III-V
Some key arguments from Meditations III-V I. THIRD MEDITATION: The existence of God A. Cosmological proof of the Existence of God In the 3rd Meditation, Descartes attempts to prove that God (i) exists,
More informationProgram Level Learning Outcomes for the Department of Philosophy Page 1
Page 1 PHILOSOPHY General Major I. Depth and Breadth of Knowledge. A. Will be able to recall what a worldview is and recognize that we all possess one. B. Should recognize that philosophy is most broadly
More informationKant s deontological ethics
Michael Lacewing Kant s deontological ethics DEONTOLOGY Deontologists believe that morality is a matter of duty. We have moral duties to do things which it is right to do and moral duties not to do things
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College. Lecture 3: Induction
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 3: Induction Hume s s Fork 2 Enquiry IV starts with a vital distinction between types of proposition: Relations of ideas can be known a priori
More informationPhil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008. [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World
1 Putnam s Main Theses: 1. There is no ready-made world. Phil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008 [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World * [A ready-made world]: The world itself has to
More informationVersion 1.0. General Certificate of Education June 2013. Religious Studies Philosophy of Religion A2 Unit 3B. Final. Mark Scheme
Version 1.0 General Certificate of Education June 2013 Religious Studies Philosophy of Religion A2 Unit 3B RST3B Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Principal Examiner and considered, together
More informationPlato gives another argument for this claiming, relating to the nature of knowledge, which we will return to in the next section.
Michael Lacewing Plato s theor y of Forms FROM SENSE EXPERIENCE TO THE FORMS In Book V (476f.) of The Republic, Plato argues that all objects we experience through our senses are particular things. We
More informationThe Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas
The Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas René Descartes and John Locke, two of the principal philosophers who shaped modern philosophy, disagree on several topics; one of them concerns
More informationInductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7. Inductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7 Inductive Reasoning We learned that valid deductive thinking begins with at least one universal premise and leads to a conclusion that is believed to be contained in the
More informationWriting Thesis Defense Papers
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
More informationGCE Religious Studies. Mark Scheme for June 2014. Unit G571: Philosophy of Religion. Advanced Subsidiary GCE. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations
GCE Religious Studies Unit G571: Philosophy of Religion Advanced Subsidiary GCE Mark Scheme for June 2014 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body,
More informationHarperOne Reading and Discussion Guide for The Problem of Pain. Reading and Discussion Guide for. C. S. Lewis
Reading and Discussion Guide for The Problem of Pain by C. S. Lewis 1. C. S. Lewis writes, Christianity is not the conclusion of a philosophical debate on the origins of the universe.... It is not a system
More information#HUMN-104 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY
Coffeyville Community College #HUMN-104 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Mike Arpin Instructor COURSE NUMBER: HUMN-104 COURSE TITLE: Introduction to Philosophy CREDIT HOURS: 3 INSTRUCTOR:
More informationArgument for a Distinction Between the Mind/Soul and the Body. This is a prose summary of the diagrammed argument on the previous page:
Argument for a Distinction Between the Mind/Soul and the Body This is a prose summary of the diagrammed argument on the previous page: The goal of this argument is to show that there is a metaphysical
More informationThe Meta-Problem of Change
NOÛS 43:2 (2009) 286 314 The Meta-Problem of Change THOMAS HOFWEBER University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1. Introduction One of the central problems in metaphysics over the last so many centuries
More informationHow To Understand The Nature Of God
The Nature of God Teleological argument (intelligent design) Order and complexity via intelligent design by God. From Greek word telos meaning purpose suggests that the world has been designed for a purpose.
More informationIntroduction. Dear Leader,
Table of Contents Introduction...4 Meeting and Setting Goals...6 Week 1: The Great Human Questions...9 Week 2: Examining the Ways We Know...15 Week 3: The Christian Worldview...24 Appendix A: The Divine
More informationTime and Causation in Gödel s Universe.
Time and Causation in Gödel s Universe. John L. Bell In 1949 the great logician Kurt Gödel constructed the first mathematical models of the universe in which travel into the past is, in theory at least,
More informationQuine on truth by convention
Quine on truth by convention March 8, 2005 1 Linguistic explanations of necessity and the a priori.............. 1 2 Relative and absolute truth by definition.................... 2 3 Is logic true by convention?...........................
More informationAtheism. Richland Creek Community Church
Atheism Richland Creek Community Church The Existence of God: Does America believe in God? Google - What percentage of Americans believe in God? = well over 90%. In fact, over the past 50 years of research
More informationGOD S BIG STORY Week 1: Creation God Saw That It Was Good 1. LEADER PREPARATION
This includes: 1. Leader Preparation 2. Lesson Guide GOD S BIG STORY Week 1: Creation God Saw That It Was Good 1. LEADER PREPARATION LESSON OVERVIEW Exploring the first two chapters of Genesis provides
More informationKant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Winter, 2015/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationHume on identity over time and persons
Hume on identity over time and persons phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 3, 2006 1 Why we have no idea of the self........................... 1 2 Change and identity................................. 2 3 Hume
More informationHow should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence?
Subject: Title: Word count: Epistemology How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence? 2,707 1 How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it
More informationActs 11 : 1-18 Sermon
Acts 11 : 1-18 Sermon Imagine a church being riven apart by different personalities leading different groups each trying to pull it in different directions. Imagine a church whose future is threatened
More informationCritical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean?
Critical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean? 1 The words critically analyse can cause panic in students when they first turn over their examination paper or are handed their assignment questions. Why?
More informationHandout #1: Mathematical Reasoning
Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or
More informationOne natural response would be to cite evidence of past mornings, and give something like the following argument:
Hume on induction Suppose you were asked to give your reasons for believing that the sun will come up tomorrow, in the form of an argument for the claim that the sun will come up tomorrow. One natural
More informationPrimary and Secondary Qualities Charles Kaijo
Primary and Secondary Qualities Charles Kaijo From examining John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities in an object and Bishop George Berkeley s refutation to Locke s argument, it
More informationExistence Is Not a Predicate by Immanuel Kant
Existence Is Not a Predicate by Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant, Thoemmes About the author.... Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) studied in Königsberg, East Prussia. Before he fully developed an interest in philosophy,
More informationScience and Scientific Reasoning. Critical Thinking
Science and Scientific Reasoning Critical Thinking Some Common Myths About Science Science: What it is and what it is not Science and Technology Science is not the same as technology The goal of science
More informationThe Problem of Evil not If God exists, she'd be OOG. If an OOG being exists, there would be no evil. God exists.
24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger September 14, 2005 The Problem of Evil Last time we considered the ontological argument for the existence of God. If the argument is cogent, then we
More informationA DEFENSE OF ABORTION
JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON S A DEFENSE OF ABORTION Phil 100, Introduction to Philosophy Benjamin Visscher Hole IV JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON is an American philosopher who teaches at the Massachusetts Institute
More informationPhilosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Fall, 2015
Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Fall, 2015 Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108
More informationYear 11 Revision. Complete the range of questions set within class and revise using the revision guides, working around a range of techniques.
Year 11 Revision Complete the range of questions set within class and revise using the revision guides, working around a range of techniques. http://www.aqa.org.uk/exams-administration/exams-guidance/find-pastpapers-and-mark-schemes
More informationPascal is here expressing a kind of skepticism about the ability of human reason to deliver an answer to this question.
Pascal s wager So far we have discussed a number of arguments for or against the existence of God. In the reading for today, Pascal asks not Does God exist? but Should we believe in God? What is distinctive
More informationScience and Religion
1 Science and Religion Scripture: Colossians 1:15-20 By Pastor John H. Noordhof Williamsburg Christian Reformed Church October 21, 2012 Morning Service People of God: Today we will deal with the troubling
More informationhij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit B Religion and Ethics 2 Example of Candidate s Work from the January 2009 Examination Candidate A
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit B Religion and Ethics 2 Example of Candidate s Work from the January 2009 Examination Candidate A Copyright 2009 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved.
More informationGCE Religious Studies Explanation of Terms Unit 1D: Religion, Philosophy and Science
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Explanation of s Unit 1D: Religion, Philosophy and Science The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) is a company limited by guarantee registered
More informationIn an article titled Ethical Absolutism and the
Stance Volume 3 April 2010 A Substantive Revision to Firth's Ideal Observer Theory ABSTRACT: This paper examines Ideal Observer Theory and uses criticisms of it to lay the foundation for a revised theory
More informationThe Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God Gerry J Hughes
The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God What is one trying to prove? Traditionally, the cosmological argument was intended to prove that there exists a being which is distinct from the universe,
More informationChapter 5: Fallacies. 23 February 2015
Chapter 5: Fallacies 23 February 2015 Plan for today Talk a bit more about arguments notice that the function of arguments explains why there are lots of bad arguments Turn to the concept of fallacy and
More informationArguments and Dialogues
ONE Arguments and Dialogues The three goals of critical argumentation are to identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments. The term argument is used in a special sense, referring to the giving of reasons
More informationThe Refutation of Relativism
The Refutation of Relativism There are many different versions of relativism: ethical relativism conceptual relativism, and epistemic relativism are three. In this paper, I will be concerned with only
More informationThe Logical Way to Teach Introduction to Philosophy. Gabriel R. Camacho El Paso Community College, Transmountain Campus
1 The Logical Way to Teach Introduction to Philosophy Gabriel R. Camacho El Paso Community College, Transmountain Campus Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gabriel R. Camacho,
More informationPractical Jealousy Management
Florida Poly Retreat 2006 Practical Jealousy Management Part 1: On the Nature of Jealousy Jealousy is an unusual emotion in that it is an emotion rooted in other emotions. Often, the root of jealousy lies
More informationInvalidity in Predicate Logic
Invalidity in Predicate Logic So far we ve got a method for establishing that a predicate logic argument is valid: do a derivation. But we ve got no method for establishing invalidity. In propositional
More informationTitle: Duty Derives from Telos: The Teleology behind Kant s Categorical Imperative. Author: Micah Tillman
Title: Duty Derives from Telos: The Teleology behind Kant s Categorical Imperative Author: Micah Tillman Word Count: 3,358 (3,448, including content notes) Abstract: This paper argues that Kant s view
More information1 Must the universe have a cause?
1 Must the universe have a cause? Nothing will come of nothing. William Shakespeare, King Lear THE MYSTERIES OF EXISTENCE Why does the universe exist? Why do living things exist? Why do intelligent beings
More informationWRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The
More informationParveen Babi on UG perfect human-being
Parveen Babi on UG I must state a few facts about UG Krishnamurti here, because it is impossible to understand my case without knowing a little bit about UG and the facts of his enlightenment. The only
More informationHonours programme in Philosophy
Honours programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy offers students a broad and in-depth introduction to the main areas of Western philosophy and the philosophy
More informationDescribe a time when you were challenged to move on faith and not on sight. What did you learn?
Week 32, John 20:24 31 Hook Icebreaker: Break your class into small groups, between four and six people. Ask the following questions: What is the definition of faith? How does someone s faith grow? Describe
More informationWRITING PROOFS. Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology
WRITING PROOFS Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology A theorem is just a statement of fact A proof of the theorem is a logical explanation of why the theorem is true Many theorems have this
More informationTHE LAWS OF BIBLICAL PROSPERITY (Chapter One)
THE LAWS OF BIBLICAL PROSPERITY (Chapter One) September 2006 MAKE A WAY MINISTRIES Cornerstone Financial Counselors THE LAWS OF BIBLICAL PROSPERITY Chapter One God Wants You to Prosper The purpose of this
More informationReality 2: God Pursues a Continuing Love Relationship with You that is Real and Personal
Reality 2: God Pursues a Continuing Love Relationship with You that is Real and Personal Reality 2: God Pursues a Continuing Love Relationship with You that is Real and Personal Created for a Love Relationship
More informationWhat is Organizational Communication?
What is Organizational Communication? By Matt Koschmann Department of Communication University of Colorado Boulder 2012 So what is organizational communication? And what are we doing when we study organizational
More information~SHARING MY PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE~
April 2012 ~SHARING MY PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE~ Dear Friends, It is a certainty that shared values encourage cooperative relationships. I don t know who first said this, but I certainly believe it to be true.
More informationFree Will. Freedom: To possess freedom of choice is to possess the ability to do otherwise.
Free Will Freedom: To possess freedom of choice is to possess the ability to do otherwise. Furthermore, if one is NOT able to do otherwise (i.e., if one is not free), then one is not responsible for their
More informationSkepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds
Skepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds So far in this course we have, broadly speaking, discussed two different sorts of issues: issues connected with the nature of persons (a
More informationDevotion NT273 CHILDREN S DEVOTIONS FOR THE WEEK OF: LESSON TITLE: The Garden of Gethsemane. THEME: We always need to pray! SCRIPTURE: Luke 22:39-53
Devotion NT273 CHILDREN S DEVOTIONS FOR THE WEEK OF: LESSON TITLE: The Garden of Gethsemane THEME: We always need to pray! SCRIPTURE: Luke 22:39-53 Dear Parents Welcome to Bible Time for Kids. Bible Time
More informationTHEME: Jesus knows all about us and He loves us.
Devotion NT224 CHILDREN S DEVOTIONS FOR THE WEEK OF: LESSON TITLE: The Woman at the Well THEME: Jesus knows all about us and He loves us. SCRIPTURE: John 4:1-42 Dear Parents Welcome to Bible Time for Kids!
More informationModule Five Critical Thinking
Module Five Critical Thinking Introduction Critical thinking is often perceived as a difficult skill separate from the thinking process as a whole. In fact, it is the essence of thinking. It is not enough
More informationChapter 8 BRAIN VS MACHINE
Chapter 8 BRAIN VS MACHINE In this chapter we will examine the current state of the art insofar as we can compare the electronic computer with the human brain. Our conclusion, as you will see, is that
More informationMILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.
MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility Mill s principle combines theories of the right
More informationPositive Philosophy by August Comte
Positive Philosophy by August Comte August Comte, Thoemmes About the author.... August Comte (1798-1857), a founder of sociology, believes aspects of our world can be known solely through observation and
More informationCourse Syllabus Department of Philosophy and Religion Skidmore College. PH 101: Introduction to Philosophy TUTH 3:40-5:30 Spring, 2011
Course Syllabus Department of Philosophy and Religion Skidmore College PH 101: Introduction to Philosophy Reg Lilly TUTH 3:40-5:30 Spring, 2011 COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is designed to introduce
More informationIn Defense of Kantian Moral Theory Nader Shoaibi University of California, Berkeley
In Defense of Kantian Moral Theory University of California, Berkeley In this paper, I will argue that Kant provides us with a plausible account of morality. To show that, I will first offer a major criticism
More informationSermon Easter5b 2015:Evangelism is the love of God in Action to Change the World
Sermon Easter5b 2015:Evangelism is the love of God in Action to Change the World Introduction One of the reasons that the season of Easter goes well beyond Easter Day Is because we as a church, as followers
More informationContents. Preface 7. Contents
Contents Contents Preface 7 Part One: Twelve Steps 9 Step One 10 Step Two 15 Step Three 19 Step Four 25 Step Five 31 Step Six 35 Step Seven 39 Step Eight 43 Step Nine 47 Step Ten 52 Step Eleven 56 Step
More informationThe Essential Elements of Writing a Romance Novel
The Essential Elements of Writing a Romance Novel by Leigh Michaels Even if you re a seat-of-the-pants, explore-as-you-go sort of writer, there are a few things you need to know about your story before
More informationYr11 Philosophy and Ethics Religious Studies B (OCR) GCSE. Science and Religion B602
Name:. Form:. Yr11 Philosophy and Ethics Religious Studies B (OCR) GCSE Science and Religion B602 ACTIVITY: Scientific ideas about the origins of the world and humanity In the frame below there are six
More informationKey Words Immortality: endless life or existence; life after death
Key Words Immortality: endless life or existence; life after death Legacy: something handed down from an ancestor; a way of being remembered after death Resurrection: rising from the dead or returning
More informationEdexcel A2 Implications 6RS04: Philosophy of Religion A workbook and study guide
Edexcel A2 Implications 6RS04: A workbook and study guide Contents Introduction What is this unit about? 2 How will this workbook help you? 3 What do you have to do in the exam? 4 What is meant by religion
More informationDEVELOPING HYPOTHESIS AND
Shalini Prasad Ajith Rao Eeshoo Rehani DEVELOPING 500 METHODS SEPTEMBER 18 TH 2001 DEVELOPING HYPOTHESIS AND Introduction Processes involved before formulating the hypotheses. Definition Nature of Hypothesis
More informationNeutrality s Much Needed Place In Dewey s Two-Part Criterion For Democratic Education
Neutrality s Much Needed Place In Dewey s Two-Part Criterion For Democratic Education Taylor Wisneski, Kansas State University Abstract This paper examines methods provided by both John Dewey and Amy Gutmann.
More informationLocke. Reading Questions Introduction to Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Summary of Locke. Reading Questions
Locke Reading Questions Introduction to Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Summary of Locke Reading Questions. Was Locke a foundationalist? 2. What is empiricism? Was Locke an empiricist? 3.
More informationManufacturers versus Component Part and Raw Material Suppliers: How to Prevent Liability By Kenneth Ross *
Manufacturers versus Component Part and Raw Material Suppliers: How to Prevent Liability By Kenneth Ross * Introduction One of the more perplexing and potentially dangerous areas of product liability practice
More informationJesus is The Way. A copy of the activity sheet for each child A hole-punch Crayons, scissors, yarn, and double-sided tape Duct tape for one activity
Jesus is The Way Teacher Pep Talk: How do we get to heaven? It seems like such a simple question, and it deserves a straightforward answer. Jesus gave that answer to His disciples on the night before His
More informationCritical Study David Benatar. Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
NOÛS 43:4 (2009) 776 785 Critical Study David Benatar. Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) ELIZABETH HARMAN Princeton University In this
More informationMetaphysics and the Question of Being
Metaphysics and the Question of Being 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between Heidegger s account of metaphysics and the central topic of his work, the question of
More informationStruggling Faith. Spring Quarter: The Gift of Faith Unit 1: Tests of Faith. Sunday school lesson for the week of March 20, 2016 By Dr.
Struggling Faith Spring Quarter: The Gift of Faith Unit 1: Tests of Faith Sunday school lesson for the week of March 20, 2016 By Dr. Hal Brady Lesson scripture: Mark 14:26-31, 66-72 As a young minister,
More informationSelf-Improving Supply Chains
Self-Improving Supply Chains Cyrus Hadavi Ph.D. Adexa, Inc. All Rights Reserved January 4, 2016 Self-Improving Supply Chains Imagine a world where supply chain planning systems can mold themselves into
More informationINTELLECTUAL APPROACHES
Michael Lacewing Can social science explain away religion? The view of religion taken by social scientists has changed considerably over the last 150 years. (A helpful review of the first 100 years is
More informationThe subtitle of Ravi Zacharias book, Jesus Among Other Gods, is The
The subtitle of Ravi Zacharias book, Jesus Among Other Gods, is The Absolute Claims of the Christian Message. 1 This subtitle makes the definitive statement regarding where Zacharias stands in his defense
More informationHOW TO CHANGE NEGATIVE THINKING
HOW TO CHANGE NEGATIVE THINKING For there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2, 239 251. Although you may not be fully aware of it, our minds
More informationP R I M A R Y A N D S E C O N D A R Y Q U A L I T I E S
P R I M A R Y A N D S E C O N D A R Y Q U A L I T I E S W E E K 1 1. Overview Week 1: Introduction to the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction. Week 2: Dispositionalist Views of Colour Week 3: Colour
More information