Reality in the Eyes of Descartes and Berkeley. By: Nada Shokry 5/21/2013 AUC - Philosophy
|
|
- Adam Richards
- 1 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reality in the Eyes of Descartes and Berkeley By: Nada Shokry 5/21/2013 AUC - Philosophy
2 Shokry, 2 One person's craziness is another person's reality. Tim Burton This quote best describes what one finds out when studying how two great philosophers, like Descartes and Berkeley, think about the world as two distinguished versions or standards of reality yet with the same starting point and the same goal. Both Descartes and Berkeley were religious, believed in God and were against atheism. This means both had the same goal of trying to convince people not to avoid involving God in their lives. They also agreed on the facts from which their different explanations are derived and deduced. These unquestioned facts they built upon their conclusions are that all what we experience or perceive immediately in our lives are ideas that passively happen to us without our interference. For instance, I cannot help but see the keyboard when looking at it now. This is something I experience by the senses which are direct empirical evidence. However, Berkeley has a different hypothesis than Descartes when trying to explain these facts and deducing mediate theories about their causes. This essay will discuss the arguments provided in the theories of both philosophers to explain reality, what the motives and the results of these theories are and my opinion about them. Descartes begins in his first meditation to destruct all opinions he had and raze everything to the ground ( First Meditation, 18) in order to reach what cannot be doubted and the thing that he can be 100 % certain of. Using this method he found his first undoubted fact: As long as I is thinking I must exist. Similarly, Berkeley represented by Philonous begins with attacking and destructing the old theory of Descartes represented by Hylas about the cause of the ideas. He, then presents an alternative theory that he thinks is more plausible. So, what is the theory of Descartes, why does Berkeley think of it as repugnant and inconsistent ( Third Dialogue, p.66) and what is his alternative view?
3 Shokry, 3 Descartes distinguishes between two concepts: the image of an object and the object itself. In other words, for him there exists two kinds of realities: Formal/Actual Reality (= the world of things) and Objective Reality (= the world of Ideas ). According to the law of conservation of matter, both realities should match. Similar to chemical reactions, what is written before the arrow should be equal to what is written after it so as nothing would be created out of nothing. If I now get the image of the keyboard in my head (objective reality) it must be because there is a keyboard in the outer world ( formal reality) and not two or zero. Descartes also distinguishes between two other concepts: Primary properties of objects and secondary ones. He argues that the essence of the objects is primary properties that cannot be perceived by the senses whereas the secondary which can be perceived are not real. He gives the wax example to explain that all the secondary properties of a wax, such as color, shape etc., change when heating it yet it is still wax because of its primary properties that we cannot sense. This was considered the first step towards Modern Science which suggests that everything is made out of Atoms. Berkeley, however, thinks that this gap between sensible ideas and reality gives rise to skepticism and eventually leads to craziness. This is because, according to Descartes, real does not mean sensible, because senses are not always right. Hence, what is real exists but we do not sense it. Berkeley also finds it a frightening idea to think that the outer world or the matter which signifies extended, solid, moveable, unthinking, inactive substance ( Second Dialogue, p.51) to be the cause of our ideas. The reason for this is that it gives rise to Deism which is the belief of God as a creator and nothing else even if it is unintentional of Descartes. God may have created the world and left it work by itself without him watching. Therefore, Berkeley denies Descartes theory and starts arguing how secondary properties heat and cold, tastes, odors, sounds and colors and primary ones as defined by Descartes extension, motion and solidity do not exist outside the mind. He uses the same argument for all the properties which is their relativity. He gives an example for each property to defend his point, e.g. that one
4 Shokry, 4 can put his two hands into the same water and feels the water to be cold with one hand and hot with the other. Or what is considered to be solid for one animal is soft for the other.and so on. So, according to Berkeley, there is no reason to believe that there is a fixed unchanging reality in the outer world rather than everything is relative. There is no need to believe and it does not even make sense to believe that an unperceivable material substance that materialists cannot even describe is the reality and is the cause of our ideas rather than actually believing what you see, feel or touch. This way, the paradox and contradiction of a physical thing, like the brain, causing a non physical thing, which is the mind and ideas, is avoidable. Consequently, I think, if there was a contest for the evidences both provide, Berkeley, the man of Common Sense ( Third Dialogue, p.63) would win as he uses direct empirical evidence which are the senses. In short, you do not trust your senses, I do (Third Dialogue, p.33). So, if there are no primary properties that are the cause of our ideas, where do our ideas come from, according to Berkeley? Because everything is relative, this means that reality only exists in our minds. There is no outer world, there are only ideas. Objects exist because we perceive them. They exist in our ideas. Everything we see, hear, feel or touch are things we perceive by the senses which are ideas. How is it possible, however, to explain that I now exist as I am sitting alone in my room typing on the keyboard and nobody is seeing me nor perceiving me in any way? Berkley gives an answer to this question as he says there must be an omnipresent eternal mind (Third Dialogue, p.64) who perceives everything and who is the cause of our ideas. This way, he can get rid of Deism by putting God in the center as he is in control of everything in our lives. Now, as God is not something you can perceive, how does that differ from Descartes argument that the unperceiving matter is the cause of our ideas and is the reality? I do not deny the existence of material substance, merely because I have no notion of it, but
5 Shokry, 5 because the notion of it is inconsistent, (Third Dialogue, p.66). Berkeley thinks that it makes no sense to think that something which is inactive, passive and perceived rather than perceiving, such as matter, would cause something active and perceiving, such as the mind where ideas come from. Because I thinks and I exists, I, the soul or the mind must be active, perceiving and immaterial. We, the thinking things, are finite created spirits whereas God is an infinite, 100 % active and perfect spirit. So, what is more reasonable to believe? God, the infinite active spirit to be the source of our ideas, or matter which is passive and not perceiving? Descartes and Berkeley have different approaches to prove God s existence other than the previous. Berkeley s Argument from Design suggests that the world we perceive is so complex, perfect and beautiful that it cannot be created by coincidence. He does not know God immediately, but through deducing his existence from the ideas he experience. He thinks that we deprive the beauty of creation when we believe in Materialism. Another argument he uses, is that the ideas of everything are particular except the notion of God as we did not experience or perceive it unlike all other ideas. When I think of Computers, I imagine a specific computer and not a general one. There are no general ideas except for the idea of God who is a spirit. Descartes, however, proves the existence of God through a chain of consequences Causal proof. Because of the law of conservation of matter, the cause must equal the effect, if we have an idea of God than this idea is the effect and God is the cause. The idea we have of God is an innate idea that we did not produce ourselves. Although both arguments, that of Berkeley and Descartes seem similar, Descartes proves the existence of god as a result of a physical or scientific law, unlike Berkley who deduces the existence of God through the ideas he is experiencing: the beauty of nature.etc. When explaining why there is evil in the world, if God is the one who causes all the ideas,
6 Shokry, 6 both Descartes and Berkeley have the same answer. All the evil in the world is our production through our behavior. God created us and gave us free will even in the world of ideas to choose the wrong or the right way. This is because, e.g. putting someone to the death penalty for committing murder is the same physical act as murder itself but the reason and moral motive is different. So, God cannot be blamed for every action we take as it is when believing in Materialism. Both Berkley and Descartes agree on the division of ideas to consist out of perception and judgment. We cannot be mistaken about our ideas but we can be about the inferences we make about these ideas. I may think that something is solid from a distance but when I come closer I see it is liquid. The idea was not wrong, only the inference. At the end, there lies the question: Why is it not possible that materialism and idealism coexist? Why is not God controlling everything through creating materialism which cause our ideas? Berkley s answer is that God, the infinite perfect all powerful spirit, does not need an instrument (Second Dialogue, p.52) for us to have ideas. Why should there be material substances? I think, both philosophers, were successful at making their shocking or bizarre conclusions, convincing or at least plausible through their good irrefutable arguments. Descartes depends on physical laws and undoubting inferences of facts in his conclusions which are logical while Berkley depends on having the best evidence and on Common Sense that there is no better reason to believe in another theory other than his. This is specifically clear in his argument about the impossibility of the coexistence of Materialism and the controlling God. As I was studying Descartes I had no reason to doubt any of his conclusions or arguments. The same happened to
7 Shokry, 7 me while studying Berkley, though both theories seem extreme, Materialism or Idealism. However, I also do not see a reason why I should take the facts that they both agree on as granted, that what I experience is just an idea. Why separating reality in ideas and causes of ideas? Why are sensible things separated from reality?
REASONS FOR HOLDING THIS VIEW
Michael Lacewing Substance dualism A substance is traditionally understood as an entity, a thing, that does not depend on another entity in order to exist. Substance dualism holds that there are two fundamentally
Chapter 4. Descartes, Third Meditation. 4.1 Homework
Chapter 4 Descartes, Third Meditation 4.1 Homework Readings : - Descartes, Meditation III - Objections and Replies: a) Third O and R: CSM II, 132; 127-8. b) Fifth O and R: CSM II, 195-97, 251. c) First
This is because the quality of extension is part of the essence of material objects.
UNIT 1: RATIONALISM HANDOUT 5: DESCARTES MEDITATIONS, MEDITATION FIVE 1: CONCEPTS AND ESSENCES In the Second Meditation Descartes found that what we know most clearly and distinctly about material objects
Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2015 Test 2 Answers
1. Descartes, Locke and Berkeley all believe that Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2015 Test 2 Answers a. nothing exists except minds and the ideas in them. b. we can t ever be justified in believing in
THE KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENT
Michael Lacewing Descartes arguments for distinguishing mind and body THE KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENT In Meditation II, having argued that he knows he thinks, Descartes then asks what kind of thing he is. Discussions
Primary and Secondary Qualities Charles Kaijo
Primary and Secondary Qualities Charles Kaijo From examining John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities in an object and Bishop George Berkeley s refutation to Locke s argument, it
Descartes Fourth Meditation On human error
Descartes Fourth Meditation On human error Descartes begins the fourth Meditation with a review of what he has learned so far. He began his search for certainty by questioning the veracity of his own senses.
Descartes Meditations Module 3 AQA. Meditation I Things which can be called into Doubt
Descartes Meditations Module 3 AQA Meditation I Things which can be called into Doubt Descartes rejects all his beliefs about the external world because they are doubtful and he wants to find a foundation
1/10. Descartes 2: The Cogito and the Mind
1/10 Descartes 2: The Cogito and the Mind Recap: last week we undertook to follow Descartes path of radical doubt in order to attempt to discover what, if anything, can be known for certain. This path
The Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas
The Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas René Descartes and John Locke, two of the principal philosophers who shaped modern philosophy, disagree on several topics; one of them concerns
BERKELEY S ATTACK OF LOCKE S REPRESENTATIONALISM
1 BERKELEY S ATTACK OF LOCKE S REPRESENTATIONALISM Benjamin Strickland Faculty Sponsor: L. Nathan Oaklander Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan-Flint George Berkeley s attack on John Locke
Descartes Handout #2. Meditation II and III
Descartes Handout #2 Meditation II and III I. Meditation II: The Cogito and Certainty A. I think, therefore I am cogito ergo sum In Meditation II Descartes proposes a truth that cannot be undermined by
1/8. Descartes 4: The Fifth Meditation
1/8 Descartes 4: The Fifth Meditation Recap: last time we found that Descartes in the 3 rd Meditation set out to provide some grounds for thinking that God exists, grounds that would answer the charge
Descartes : The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness. (Margaret Wilson)
Descartes : The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness Detailed Argument Introduction Despite Descartes mind-body dualism being the most cited aspect of Descartes philosophy in recent philosophical
Lecture 7.1 Descartes Meditation 2, 3.
TOPIC: Lecture 7.1 Descartes Meditation 2, 3. Descartes Rationalism; Wax argument; Argument for the Existence of God. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Rationalism and Empiricism Cogito ergo sum. Wax argument. Argument
God and Reality. Arman Hovhannisyan
God and Reality Arman Hovhannisyan Metaphysics has done everything to involve God in the world of being. However, in case of considering Reality as being and nothingness, naturally, the metaphysical approach
ST ANSELM S VERSION OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Anselm s argument relies on conceivability :
Michael Lacewing The ontological argument St Anselm and Descartes both famously presented an ontological argument for the existence of God. (The word ontological comes from ontology, the study of (-ology)
Lecture Notes, October 30. 0. Introduction to the philosophy of mind
Philosophy 110W - 3: Introduction to Philosophy, Hamilton College, Fall 2007 Russell Marcus, Instructor email: rmarcus1@hamilton.edu website: http://thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/intro_f07/course_home.htm
1/9. Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas
1/9 Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas This week we are going to begin looking at a new area by turning our attention to the work of John Locke, who is probably the most famous English philosopher of all
Descartes rationalism
Michael Lacewing Descartes rationalism Descartes Meditations provide an extended study in establishing knowledge through rational intuition and deduction. We focus in this handout on three central claims:
MINDS, BODIES, AND GEOMETRY
DESCARTES SCIENCE MINDS, BODIES, AND GEOMETRY Perhaps the most important feature of Descartes ontology is his belief that there are only two kinds of things in the universe: corporeal bodies and minds:
Some key arguments from Meditations III-V
Some key arguments from Meditations III-V I. THIRD MEDITATION: The existence of God A. Cosmological proof of the Existence of God In the 3rd Meditation, Descartes attempts to prove that God (i) exists,
Message: Faith & Science - Part 1
The Light Shines Outside the Box www.jesusfamilies.org Message: Faith & Science - Part 1 This message is not for people who believe that God exists. Most people on the earth believe that some God exists,
Aquinas on Essence, Existence, and Divine Simplicity Strange but Consistent. In the third question of the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas is concerned with
Aquinas on Essence, Existence, and Divine Simplicity Strange but Consistent In the third question of the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas is concerned with divine simplicity. This is important for him both theologically
Descartes. Philosophy and Good Sense
Perspectives in Philosophy Rene Descartes Descartes Philosophy is the search for certainty the search to know, for yourself, what is really true and really false to know which beliefs are reliable. However,
PHILOSOPHY SENIOR SEMINAR THE PHILOSOPHY OF PERCEPTION ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
PHILOSOPHY 4830 - SENIOR SEMINAR THE PHILOSOPHY OF PERCEPTION ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS 1. As is indicated in the syllabus, the written work for the course will take the form of two essays,
The Philosophical Importance of Mathematical Logic Bertrand Russell
The Philosophical Importance of Mathematical Logic Bertrand Russell IN SPEAKING OF "Mathematical logic", I use this word in a very broad sense. By it I understand the works of Cantor on transfinite numbers
it is no surprise that God, in creating me, should have placed this idea in me to be, as it were, the mark of the craftsman stamped on his work.
THIRD MEDITATION The existence of God So far Descartes sceptical arguments have threatened all knowledge but the knowledge of self provided in the cogito. But instead of turning now to the question of
P R I M A R Y A N D S E C O N D A R Y Q U A L I T I E S
P R I M A R Y A N D S E C O N D A R Y Q U A L I T I E S W E E K 1 1. Overview Week 1: Introduction to the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction. Week 2: Dispositionalist Views of Colour Week 3: Colour
Proving God Exists. Ashley Kerner
Proving God Exists Ashley Kerner Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor Arts in the Integral Curriculum of Liberal Arts at Saint Mary s College April 16, 2012 Advisor: Preface During
Summary of Meditations III-V I. THIRD MEDITATION: The existence of God
1 Summary of Meditations III-V I. THIRD MEDITATION: The existence of God A. Cosmological proof of the Existence of God In the 3rd Meditation, Descartes attempts to prove that God (i) exists, (ii) is the
Skepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds
Skepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds So far in this course we have, broadly speaking, discussed two different sorts of issues: issues connected with the nature of persons (a
My Revision Notes: OCR AS Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion
My Revision Notes: OCR AS Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion Exam practice questions OCR G571 2007 2012. Answer guidance has not been written or approved by OCR. These are guidelines of what might
Introduction. Dear Leader,
Table of Contents Introduction...4 Meeting and Setting Goals...6 Week 1: The Great Human Questions...9 Week 2: Examining the Ways We Know...15 Week 3: The Christian Worldview...24 Appendix A: The Divine
The argument from evil
The argument from evil Our topic today is the argument from evil. This is by far the most important argument for the conclusion that God does not exist. The aim of at least the simplest form of this argument
Responding to Arguments against the Existence of God Based on Evil
Responding to Arguments against the Existence of God Based on Evil By INTRODUCTION Throughout the history of western thought, numerous philosophers and great thinkers have struggled with what is known
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy Meditation 1: Concerning Those Things That Can Be Called Into Doubt (27-30.1) Descartes wants to establish a firm foundation for his beliefs, having noted that
Descartes Proof of the External World Paul Sperring
Introduction Descartes Proof of the External World In order to fully overcome the doubts of Meditation I Descartes had to show, in Meditation VI, that he could be certain of the existence of the material
Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way:
Aquinas Third Way Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way: 1. 2. 3. 4. At least one thing has an efficient cause. Every causal chain must either be circular,
Reading Questions for Phil 412.200, Spring 2012 (Daniel)
Reading Questions for Phil 412.200, Spring 2012 (Daniel) Questions on Descartes Meditations I & II (Jan. 19) 1. For Descartes, why can t knowledge gained through sense experience be trusted as the basis
The Paradox of Epicurus (~300BC) God and the Problem of Evil. "But, the Baby's Going to Heaven" General Problem
The Paradox of Epicurus (~300BC) God and the Problem of Evil Notes from and 1. Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or God can abolish evil and does want to. 2. If God wants to abolish evil and
QUESTION 110. How Angels Preside over Corporeal Creatures
QUESTION 110 How Angels Preside over Corporeal Creatures The next thing we have to consider is how angels preside over corporeal creatures. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Are corporeal creatures
Topic 1 Introduction to epistemology
Topic 1 Introduction to epistemology Welcome to Philosophy AS: Homework Please read the introduction and access the Prezi (link on the next page) and then read through the booklet trying the different
The psychological theory of persons
The psychological theory of persons Last week were discussing dualist views of persons, according to which human beings are immaterial things distinct from their bodies. We closed by discussing some problems
Read this syllabus very carefully. If there are any reasons why you cannot comply with what I am requiring, then talk with me about this at once.
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING PHIL 2020 Maymester Term, 2010 Daily, 9:30-12:15 Peabody Hall, room 105 Text: LOGIC AND RATIONAL THOUGHT by Frank R. Harrison, III Professor: Frank R. Harrison, III Office:
Descartes s Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes s Meditations on First Philosophy G. J. Mattey Winter, 2006 / Philosophy 1 The Dawn of Modern Philosophy Modern philosophy appeared in the first half of the seventeenth century. Several philosophers
General Problem Swinburne
General Problem Swinburne Why God Allows Evil Why would an omnipotent, perfectly good God allow evil to exist? If there is not an adequate theodicy, then the existence of evil is evidence against the existence
Ad hominem: An argument directed at an opponent in a disagreement, not at the topic under discussion.
Glossary of Key Terms Ad hominem: An argument directed at an opponent in a disagreement, not at the topic under discussion. Agent: One who acts and is held responsible for those actions. Analytic judgment:
Plato gives another argument for this claiming, relating to the nature of knowledge, which we will return to in the next section.
Michael Lacewing Plato s theor y of Forms FROM SENSE EXPERIENCE TO THE FORMS In Book V (476f.) of The Republic, Plato argues that all objects we experience through our senses are particular things. We
The Existence of God ARBOR OAKS BIBLE CHAPEL JANUARY 2016
The Existence of God ARBOR OAKS BIBLE CHAPEL JANUARY 2016 The Existence of God Clarifying Terms A skeptic says: I doubt that God exists An agnostic says: I don t (or can t) know if God exists. An atheist
ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) General Observations on The Transcendental Aesthetic To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain, as clearly as possible,
Anselm s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
Anselm s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God Anselm s argument is an a priori argument; that is, it is an argument that is independent of experience and based solely on concepts and logical relations,
Faith For Every Day Living Pastor Ken Birks
I. Introductory Remarks. Faith For Every Day Living Pastor Ken Birks In this message today I want to talk about the importance of applying the faith that God has given to us to our every day circumstances.
Locke s psychological theory of personal identity
Locke s psychological theory of personal identity phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 3, 2006 1 Identity, diversity, and kinds............................. 1 2 Personal identity...................................
Descartes Meditations
Michael Lacewing Descartes Meditations The AQA syllabus identifies Descartes Meditations as a key text for the A Level in Philosophy as a whole. In this handout, I provide a commentary on the text, guided
Meditation One: Concerning Those Things That Can Be Called into Doubt
Notes on Descartes' Meditations Greetings to the Theology Faculty of Paris The purpose of this treatise is to raise metaphysical argumentation for God and the soul to a level of respectability sufficient
Introduction to Metaphysics
1 Reading Questions Metaphysics The Philosophy of Religion Arguments for God s Existence Arguments against God s Existence In Case of a Tie Summary Reading Questions Introduction to Metaphysics 1. What
Gould, James A. and Robert J. Mulvaney, eds. Classic Philosophical Questions, Eleventh Ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Pearson Prentice Hall: 2004
From: Gould, James A and Robert J Mulvaney, eds Classic Philosophical Questions, Eleventh Ed Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Pearson Prentice Hall: 2004 PART 6: Philosophy of Religion: Can We Prove God
Last May, philosopher Thomas Nagel reviewed a book by Michael Sandel titled
Fourth Quarter, 2006 Vol. 29, No. 4 Editor s Watch Sandel and Nagel on Abortion Last May, philosopher Thomas Nagel reviewed a book by Michael Sandel titled Public Philosophy in The New York Review of Books.
Leibniz s solution to the problem of evil
Leibniz s solution to the problem of evil James Franklin Think 5 (Autumn 2003), 97-101 Mark Piper s article `The perennial problem of evil (Think 4) summarises received ideas on the question. They are:
Nietzsche s perspectivism
Michael Lacewing Nietzsche s perspectivism PERSPECTIVISM In the opening sections of the book, Nietzsche repeatedly refers to perspectives. In the Preface, he says that perspectivity is the fundamental
You will by now not be surprised that a version of the teleological argument can be found in the writings of Thomas Aquinas.
The design argument The different versions of the cosmological argument we discussed over the last few weeks were arguments for the existence of God based on extremely abstract and general features of
Lesson 3 Temptation. Lesson Objectives:
Lesson 3 Temptation Lesson Objectives: The objective of this lesson is to help children and teens: Know the meaning of the word temptation Understand the process involved in yielding to temptation. Be
John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding From Rationalism to Empiricism Rationalism vs. Empiricism Empiricism: All knowledge ultimately rests upon sense experience. All justification (our reasons
History of Western Philosophy: Descartes to Kant, Spring 2011
Marina Folescu / History of Western Philosophy / Sample Syllabus page 1 of 5 History of Western Philosophy: Descartes to Kant, Spring 2011 Instructor: Marina Folescu Email: folescu@usc.edu Homepage: http://www-scf.usc.edu/
Class 13 - March 2 Locke s Theory of the Self
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 13 - March 2 Locke s Theory of the Self I. Body and Soul We have discussed two accounts of personal identity:
How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence?
Subject: Title: Word count: Epistemology How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence? 2,707 1 How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit 3B: Philosophy of Religion Explanation of Terms
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit 3B: Philosophy of Religion Explanation of s The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) is a company limited by guarantee registered in England
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The
The problem of evil and suffering is considered to be one of the most powerful arguments against the existence of God.
CHALLENGES TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF THE PROBLEM OF EVIL & SUFFERING QUICK OVERVIEW The problem of evil and suffering is considered to be one of the most powerful arguments against the existence of God. If God
Pascal is here expressing a kind of skepticism about the ability of human reason to deliver an answer to this question.
Pascal s wager So far we have discussed a number of arguments for or against the existence of God. In the reading for today, Pascal asks not Does God exist? but Should we believe in God? What is distinctive
Divine command theory
Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the semester, and the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory
The Nature of Mind by David M. Armstrong (1926- )
The Nature of Mind by David M. Armstrong (1926- ) Armstrong s Goal Armstrong interprets mental states as causes of behavior. (like Dualists) He also believes that mental states are linked to behavior (
Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
Phil 2301 Intro to Philosophy Dr. Naugle Arguments for God s Existence. B. Attitudes toward arguments for God s existence
Phil 2301 Intro to Philosophy Dr. Naugle Arguments for God s Existence I. Arguments for the Existence of God A. Two types of arguments for God s existence 1. A priori arguments 2. A posteriori arguments
Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous in opposition to Sceptics and Atheists
Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous in opposition to Sceptics and Atheists George Berkeley Copyright copyright2010 2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations.
Descartes Meditation Six. Intro to Philosophy Summer 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV
Descartes Meditation Six Intro to Philosophy Summer 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Dualism Material substance (or minds) VS Immaterial substance (or bodies) Context Meditation I Doubt everything I can
Kant s Dialectic. Lecture 3 The Soul, part II John Filling jf582@cam.ac.uk
Kant s Dialectic Lecture 3 The Soul, part II John Filling jf582@cam.ac.uk Overview 1. Re-cap 2. Second paralogism 3. Third paralogism 4. Fourth paralogism 5. Summing-up Critique of Pure Reason Transcendental
Key Words Immortality: endless life or existence; life after death
Key Words Immortality: endless life or existence; life after death Legacy: something handed down from an ancestor; a way of being remembered after death Resurrection: rising from the dead or returning
Nowhere Man. Language, Concepts, and Geach s Argument against Abstraction
Nowhere Man Charles W. Johnson PHIL4780: Kant and Transcendental Idealism 18 March 2002 Language, Concepts, and Geach s Argument against Abstraction When in the course of human events we are called upon
Atheism. Richland Creek Community Church
Atheism Richland Creek Community Church The Existence of God: Does America believe in God? Google - What percentage of Americans believe in God? = well over 90%. In fact, over the past 50 years of research
Mind & Body Cartesian Dualism
Blutner/Philosophy of Mind/Mind & Body/Cartesian dualism 1 Mind & Body Cartesian Dualism The great philosophical distinction between mind and body can be traced to the Greeks René Descartes (1596-1650),
Scientific Method & Statistical Reasoning
Scientific Method & Statistical Reasoning Paul Gribble http://www.gribblelab.org/stats/ Winter, 2016 MD Chapters 1 & 2 The idea of pure science Philosophical stances on science Historical review Gets you
Descartes Meditations II & III. Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Benjamin Visscher Hole IV
Descartes Meditations II & III Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Benjamin Visscher Hole IV SUMMARY OF MEDITATION ONE 1. Knowledge is either a priori or it is a posteriori. 2. If it is a posteriori, we do not
Arnauld vs. Descartes Theory of Dualism. vs.
Arnauld vs. Descartes Theory of Dualism vs. Dualism Descartes Theory is called Dualism Believes Mind and Body are distinct substances Bodies: mechanical, physical objects Minds: for thinking, non-physical
ADVICE TO CANDIDATES Read each question carefully and make sure you know what you have to do before starting your answer.
Advanced Subsidiary GCE GCE RELIGIOUS STUDIES G571 QP Unit G571: AS Philosophy of Religion Specimen Paper Morning/Afternoon Additional Materials: Answer Booklet ( pages) Time: 1 hour 30 minutes INSTRUCTIONS
Killing And Letting Die
[This essay originally appeared in the Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition, ed. Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker (New York: Routledge, 2001), vol. 2, pp. 947-50.] Killing And Letting Die Is it worse
Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies Unit 1 - Believing in God
Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies Unit 1 - Believing in God Key Words Agnosticism: Not being sure if god exists or not. Atheist: Believing that God does not exist. Conversion: Changing from one religion to
RENE DESCARTES MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY A summary by Torrey Wang. Meditation One: Concerning those things that can be called into doubt
RENE DESCARTES MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY A summary by Torrey Wang Meditation One: Concerning those things that can be called into doubt Descartes states that he has put off examining the foundations
LECTURE 7: THE EXISTENCE OF GOD & THE REALITY OF EVIL:
LECTURE 7: THE EXISTENCE OF GOD & THE REALITY OF EVIL: Dr. Paul R. Shockley www.prshockley.org Lecture 7 of 12 In our seventh presentation we will be introduced to the five-fold problem of evil and various
Approaches to Apologetics
Approaches to Apologetics By John McClean Matthias Media (The Briefing #119; www.matthiasmedia.com.au/briefing). Used with permission. A poverty stricken student reaches the end of her financial resources
The Three Amigos. Determinism, Libertarianism, Compatibilism
The Three Amigos Determinism, Libertarianism, Compatibilism 1 Ponder This... List three different things that you did simply because they were what you wanted to do! Why did you like the activities on
The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God Gerry J Hughes
The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God What is one trying to prove? Traditionally, the cosmological argument was intended to prove that there exists a being which is distinct from the universe,
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 2 - Meditation One Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Spring 2010, Slide 1 Five dogmas undermined by the new
The Ontological Argument by St. Anselm
The Ontological Argument by St. Anselm Canterbury Cathedral, Library of Congress, Detroit Publishing About the author.... St. Anselm (1033-1109), a member of the Benedictine Order and Bishop of Canterbury,
Outcomes Assessment of Written Papers in a Philosophy Course. Meredith Gunning, Ph.D.
Outcomes Assessment of Written Papers in a Philosophy Course Meredith Gunning, Ph.D. Me You! Note, Atlas carried the celestial sphere, not the earth! Mistaken to seek only utilitarian value of philosophy,
Writing Political Theory Papers
Writing Political Theory Papers Political theory is a little bit different than political science. Here are some important differences. 1) It s more like philosophy than social science: it is more concerned
Descartes s Argument for the Existence of the Idea of an Infinite Being
Descartes s Argument for the Existence of the Idea of an Infinite Being The Meditations on First Philosophy presents us with an alleged proof for the existence of God that proceeds from the existence of
Is this statement: (a) true; (b) false; (c) incoherent? What can we learn from a consideration of the statement?
PHILOSOPHY@BHASVIC 1 MOVING ON TO A-LEVEL PHILOSOPHY AT BHASVIC Doing philosophy is not merely giving your opinion or dismissing the opinions of others. We all hold a variety of opinions on a variety of
384.126 Logical Foundations of Cognitive Science
384.126 Logical Foundations of Cognitive Science Harold Boley NRC-IIT Fredericton Faculty of Computer Science University of New Brunswick Canada Institute of Computer Technology, TU Vienna Winter Semester