CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION
|
|
- Diane Patrick
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 66
2 Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 2 / 66
3 An Introduction to Choice Theory Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 3 / 66
4 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 4 / 66
5 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Preliminaries Risk means uncertainty in the future cash flow stream The cash flow of an asset in any future period is typically modelled as a random variable Example Consider the following asset pay-offs ($) with π 1 = π 2 = 1/2 for the two states θ: t = 0 t = 1 θ = 1 θ = 2 Investment 1 1, 000 1, 050 1, 200 Investment 2 1, , 600 Investment 3 1, 000 1, 050 1, 600 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 5 / 66
6 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Dominance State-by-state dominance: the strongest possible form of dominance We assume that the typical individual is non-satiated in consumption: she prefers more rather than less of goods the pay-offs allow her to buy Most of the cases are not so trivial and the concept of risk enters necessarily Risk is not the only consideration, the ranking between investment opportunities is typically preference dependent Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 6 / 66
7 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Mean-Variance Dominance In our example, the mean returns and their standard deviations are E (r 1 ) = 12.5% σ 1 = 7.5% E (r 2 ) = 5% σ 2 = 55% E (r 3 ) = 32.5% σ 3 = 27.5% Mean-variance dominance: higher mean and lower variance It is neither as strong nor as general as state-by-state dominance, and it is not fully reliable A criterion for selecting investments of equal magnitude, which plays a prominent role in modern portfolio theory, is For investments of the same expected return, choose the one with the lowest variance For investments of the same variance, choose the one with the greatest expected return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 7 / 66
8 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Sharpe ratio criterion Example Consider the state-contingent rates of return with π 1 = π 2 = 1/2: θ = 1 θ = 2 E (r) σ Investment 4 3% 5% 4% 1% Investment 5 2% 8% 5% 3% No dominance in either state-by-state or mean-variance terms In the mean-variance framework, one would require specifying the terms at which the investor is willing to substitute expected return for a given risk reduction Sharpe ratio criterion: (E/σ) 4 = 4 > (E/σ) 5 = 5/3 However, decisions are again preference dependent Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 8 / 66
9 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 9 / 66
10 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Economic Rationality (1) Economic rationality: individuals behaviour is predictable in that it is systematic, i.e. they attempt to achieve a set objective Definition (Preference relation) There exists a preference relation, denoted by, that describes investors ability to compare various bundles of goods, services and money. For two bundles a and b, the expression a b means the following: the investor either strictly prefers bundle a to bundle b, or she is indifferent between them. Pure indifference is denoted by a b, whereas strict preference by a b. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 10 / 66
11 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Economic Rationality (2) Assumptions Economic rationality can be summarised by the following assumptions: A.1 Every investor possesses a preference relation and it is complete. Formally, for any two bundles a and b, either a b, or b a, or both. A.2 The preference relation satisfies the fundamental property of transitivity: for any bundles a, b and c, if a b and b c, then a c. A.3 The preference relation is continuous in the following sense: let {x n } and {y n } be two sequences of consumption bundles such that x n x and y n y. If x n y n for all n, then x y. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 11 / 66
12 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Existence of Utility Function Theorem Assumptions A.1 through A.3 are sufficient to guarantee the existence of a continuous, time-invariant, real-valued utility function u : R N R +, such that for any two bundles a and b, Remarks: a b u (a) u (b). Under certainty, utility functions are unique only up to monotone transformations The notion of a bundle is very general, different elements of a bundle may represent the consumption of the same good or service in different time periods Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 12 / 66
13 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 13 / 66
14 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Introduction Under uncertainty, the objects of choice are typically vectors of state-contingent money pay-offs Those vectors form an asset or an investment Assume that individuals have no intrinsic taste for the assets themselves (not really true in practice!), but rather they are interested in what pay-offs these assets will yield and with what likelihood Also assume that investors prefer a higher pay-off to a lower one Typically, no one investment prospect will strictly dominate the others There are two ingredients in the choice between two alternatives: The probability of the states The ex-post level of utility provided by the investment Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 14 / 66
15 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Example Example The current price of all assets is $100. The forecasted prices per share in one period are the following: Which stock would you invest in? Asset State 1 State 2 A $100 $150 B $90 $160 C $90 $150 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 15 / 66
16 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Lotteries Definition (Lottery) A lottery is an object of choice, denoted by (x, y, π), that offers pay-off x with probability π and y with probability 1 π. Lottery (x, y, π): π x 1 π y Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 16 / 66
17 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Example of a Compounded Lottery Example Lottery (x, y, π) = ( (x 1, x 2, τ 1 ), (y 1, y 2, τ 2 ), π ) : τ 1 x 1 π 1 τ 1 x 2 1 π τ2 1 τ 2 y 1 y 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 17 / 66
18 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Axioms and Conventions C.1 (a) (x, y, 1) = x (b) (x, y, π) = (y, x, 1 π) (c) (x, z, π) = ( x, y, π + (1 π) τ ) if z = (x, y, τ). C.2 There exists a preference relation, which is complete and transitive C.3 The preference relation is continuous C.4 Independence of irrelevant alternatives. Let (x, y, π) and (x, z, π) be any two lotteries; then, y z if and only if (x, y, π) (x, z, π) C.5 There exists a best (most preferred) lottery, b, as well as a worst lottery, w C.6 Let x, k, z be pay-offs for which x > k > z. Then there exists a π such that (x, z, π) k C.7 Let x y. Then (x, y, π 1 ) (x, y, π 2 ) if and only if π 1 > π 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 18 / 66
19 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty The Expected Utility Theorem Theorem (The Expected Utility Theorem) If axioms C.1 through C.7 are satisfied, then there exists a utility function U defined on the lottery space such that U (x, y, π) = πu (x) + (1 π) u (y) where u (x) = U ( (x, y, 1) ). U is called the von Neumann Morgenstern (NM) utility function. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 19 / 66
20 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Remarks on the NM Utility Function Given the objective specification of probabilities, the NM utility function uniquely characterises an investor Different additional assumptions on u will identify the investor s tolerance for risk We require that u be increasing for all candidate utility functions The theorem confirms that investors are concerned only with an asset s final pay-off and the cumulative probabilities of achieving them, while the structure of uncertainty resolution is irrelevant Although the utility function is not defined over a rate of return, but on pay-off distribution, it can be generalised The NM representation is preserved under a certain class of monotone affine transformations: if U ( ) is a NM utility function, then V ( ) au ( ) + b with a > 0 is also such a function A non-linear transformation does not always respect the preference ordering Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 20 / 66
21 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 21 / 66
22 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox The Allais Paradox (1) Example Consider the following four lotteries: L 1 = (10, 000; 0; 0.1) versus L 2 = (15, 000; 0; 0.09) L 3 = (10, 000; 0; 1) versus L 4 = (15, 000; 0; 0.9). Rank the pay-offs. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 22 / 66
23 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox The Allais Paradox (2) Example (cont d) The following ranking is frequently observed in practice: L 2 L 1 and L 3 L 4. However, observe that ( ) L 1 = L 3, L 0, 0.1 ( ) L 2 = L 4, L 0, 0.1, where L 0 = (0, 0, 1). By the independence axiom, the ranking between L 1 and L 2, and between L 3 and L 4, should be identical. This is the Allais paradox (Allais, 1953). Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 23 / 66
24 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox How to Deal With the Allais Paradox? Possible reactions to the Allais paradox: 1 Yes, my choices were inconsistent; let me think again and revise them 2 No, I ll stick to my choices. The following things are missing from the theory: The pleasure of gambling; and/or The notion of regret The Allais paradox is but the first of many phenomena that appear to be inconsistent with standard preference theory Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 24 / 66
25 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox Example: Framing and Loss Aversion Example (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) 1 In addition to whatever you own, you have been given $1, 000. You are now asked to choose between L A = (1, 000; 0; 0.5) versus L B = (500; 0; 1) 2 In addition to whatever you own, you have been given $2, 000. You are now asked to choose between L C = ( 1, 000; 0; 0.5) versus L D = ( 500; 0; 1) A majority of subjects chose B in case 1 and C in case 2, but this is inconsistent with any preference relation over wealth gambles. The difference between the two cases is that the outcomes are framed as gains relative to the reference wealth level in case 1, but as losses in case 2. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 25 / 66
26 Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 26 / 66
27 Introduction Investors want to avoid risk, i.e., they want to smooth their consumption across states of nature Hence, restrictions on the NM expected utility representation must be imposed to guarantee such behaviour Since probabilities are objective and independent of investor preferences, we must restrict the utility function to capture risk aversion Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 27 / 66
28 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 28 / 66
29 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Definition of Risk Aversion Definition (Risk aversion) An investor is said to be (weakly) risk averse if u (w) E [ u ( w) ] for any random wealth w with mean w. Strict risk aversion is represented by strict inequality. An equivalent definition is: Definition (Risk aversion) An investor is said to be (weakly) risk averse if u (a) E [ u (a + ε) ], where ε is a zero-mean random variable and a is a constant. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 29 / 66
30 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Concavity and Risk Aversion A risk-averse investor would prefer to avoid a fair bet The above inequalities are known as Jensen s inequality and are equivalent to concavity of the utility function See Appendix Concavity is preserved by monotone affine transformations, so, for given preferences, either all utility functions are concave or none are For a differentiable function u, concavity is equivalent to non-increasing marginal utility: u (w 1 ) u (w 0 ) if w 1 > w 0 Strict concavity is equivalent to decreasing marginal utility (strict inequality above) For a twice differentiable function u, concavity is equivalent to u (w) 0 for all w (strict concavity implies strict inequality) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 30 / 66
31 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Concavity and Risk Aversion Intuition Consider a financial contract where the investor either receives an amount h with probability 1/2, or must pay an amount h with probability 1/2 (i.e., a lottery (h, h, 1/2)) Intuition tells us that a risk-averse investor would prefer to avoid such a security, for any level of personal income Y Formally, u (Y) > 1 2 u (Y + h) + 1 u (Y h) = E (u) = U (Y) 2 This inequality can only be satisfied for all income levels Y if the utility function is (strictly) concave Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 31 / 66
32 How To Measure Risk Aversion? A Strictly Concave Utility Function Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.1 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 32 / 66
33 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Indifferent Curves Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 33 / 66
34 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Measure Risk Aversion Given that u ( ) < 0, why not say that investor A is more risk averse than investor B iff u A (w) u B (w) for all wealth levels? Let u A (w) au A (w) + b with a > 0 Since the utility function is invariant to affine transformations, u A and u A must describe the identical ordering and must display identical risk aversion However, if a > 1, we have that u A (w) > u A (w) This a contradiction We need a measure of risk aversion that is invariant to affine transformations Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 34 / 66
35 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Coefficients of Risk Aversion Absolute risk aversion: α (w) = u (w) u (w) It depends on the preferences and not on the particular utility function representing the preferences For any risk-averse investor, α (w) 0 Relative risk aversion: ρ (w) = wα (w) = wu (w) u (w) Risk tolerance: τ (w) = 1 α (w) = u (w) u (w) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 35 / 66
36 Interpreting Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 36 / 66
37 Interpreting Risk Aversion Absolute Risk Aversion and the Odds of a Bet Consider an investor with wealth w who is offered the lottery L = (h, h, π) The investor will accept the bet if π is high enough and reject if π is low enough The willingness to accept the bet must also be related to her current level of wealth Proposition Let π = π (w, h) the probability at which the investor is indifferent between accepting and rejecting the bet. Then we have that π (w, h) = h α (w). Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 37 / 66
38 Interpreting Risk Aversion Proof. By definition, π (w, h) must satisfy u (w) = π (w, h) u (w + h) + [ 1 π (w, h) ] u (w h) Taylor approximation yields u (w + h) = u (w) + hu (w) h2 u (w) + R 1 u (w h) = u (w) hu (w) h2 u (w) + R 2 After substitution we have u (w) = π (w, h) [u (w) + hu (w) + 12 ] h2 u (w) + R [ 1 π (w, h) ] [ u (w) hu (w) + 1 ] 2 h2 u (w) + R 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 38 / 66
39 Interpreting Risk Aversion Proof (cont d). Collecting terms yields u (w) = u (w) + [ 2π (w, h) 1 ] [ hu (w) + 1 ] 2 h2 u (w) + + π (w, h) R 1 + [ 1 π (w, h) ] R 2 }{{} R Solving for π (w, h) results in π (w, h) = h [ u (w) u (w) ] R 2hu (w) = h α (w) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 39 / 66
40 Interpreting Risk Aversion Example: Exponential Utility Example Consider the utility function of the form It is easy to show that α (w) = ν. Hence, we have that u (w) = 1 ν e νw π (w, h) = h ν Now the odds demanded are independent of the level of initial wealth, but depend on the amount of wealth at risk. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 40 / 66
41 Interpreting Risk Aversion Relative Risk Aversion and the Odds of a Bet Proposition Consider an investment opportunity similar to the one above, but now the amount at risk is proportional to the investor s wealth, i.e., h = θw. Then we have that π (w, θ) = θρ (w). 4 Proof. Very similar to the case of absolute risk aversion. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 41 / 66
42 Interpreting Risk Aversion Example: Power Utility Example Consider the utility function of the form w 1 γ if γ > 0, γ = 1 u (w) = 1 γ ln w if γ = 1 It is easy to show that ρ (w) = γ. Hence, we have that π (w, h) = θγ Now the odds demanded are independent of the level of initial wealth. but depend on the fraction of wealth that is at risk. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 42 / 66
43 Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk-Neutral Investors Risk-neutral investors are identified with an affine utility function with c > 0 u (w) = c w + d It is easy to see that both α (w) = 0 and ρ (w) = 0 Such investors do not demand better than even odds when considering risky investments (π (w, h) = π (w, θ) = 1/2) The are indifferent to risk and are concerned only with an asset s expected payoff Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 43 / 66
44 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 44 / 66
45 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Definitions Consider an investor, with current wealth w, evaluating an uncertain risky pay-off Z Relying on the definition of risk aversion, we have ( u w + E ( Z )) E [u ( w + Z )] If an uncertain pay-off is available for sale, a risk-averse agent will only be willing to buy it at a price less than its expected pay-off Certainty equivalent (CE): the maximal certain amount of money an investor is willing to pay for a lottery Risk premium (π): the maximum amount the agent is willing to pay to avoid the gamble The risk premium is the difference between the expected value of the bet and the certainty equivalent Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 45 / 66
46 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Mathematical Formulation According to the above definition, the certainty equivalent and the risk premium are the solutions of the following equations: It follows that [ E u ( w + Z )] ( = u w + CE ( w, Z )) = = u (w + E ( Z ) π ( w, Z )) CE ( w, Z ) = E ( Z ) π ( w, Z ) or π ( w, Z ) = E ( Z ) CE ( w, Z ) Note that from the definition )) of CE we have that u (w + CE) < u (w + E ( Z Since u is increasing (recall that u > 0), we must have CE < E ( Z ) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 46 / 66
47 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent CE and Risk Premium: An Illustration Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.3 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 47 / 66
48 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Certainty Equivalent Example Consider an investor with log utility and initial wealth w 0 = 1, 000. She is offered the lottery Z = (200, 0, 0.5). What is the certainty equivalent of this gamble? Solution The equation that yields the CE is E [u ( w + Z )] = u ( w + CE ) Substitution results in 0.5 ln (1, 200) ln (1, 000) = ln (1, CE) from which CE = Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 48 / 66
49 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Relation Between Risk Premium and Risk Aversion Assume that E ( Z ) = 0, u is twice continuously differentiable and the gamble is a bounded random variable It can be shown that π ( w, Z ) = 1 2 σ2 z α (w) The amount one would pay to avoid the gamble is approximately proportional to the coefficient of absolute risk aversion Let π = θw be the risk premium of w + w Z; then θ = 1 2 σ2 z ρ (w) The proportion θ of initial wealth that one would pay to avoid a gamble equal to the proportion Z of initial wealth depends on relative risk aversion and the variance of Z Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 49 / 66
50 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Power Utility Example Consider again the utility function u (w) = w1 γ 1 γ with γ = 3, w = $500, 000, and Z = ($100, 000; $100, 000; 0.5). Then the risk premium will be π ( w, Z ) = 1 2 σ2 z γ w = , 0002 To double-check the approximation, calculate 3 = $30, , 000 ( u w π ( w, Z )) = u (500, , 000) = [ E u ( w + Z )] = 1 2 u (600, 000) + 1 u (400, 000) = Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 50 / 66
51 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Certainty Equivalent in Terms of Returns Let the equivalent risk-free return be defined as ( u w ( ) ) 1 + r f = u (w + CE ( w, Z )) The random pay-off Z can also be converted into a return distribution via Z = rw, or, r = Z/w Hence, r f is defined by the equation ( u w ( ) ) [ 1 + r f = E u (w ( 1 + r ))] The return risk premium, π r, is defined as π r = E ( r ) r f or E ( r ) = r f + π r Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 51 / 66
52 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Log Utility Example Consider the utility function u (w) = ln w, and assume w = $500, 000, and Z = ($100, 000; $50, 000; 0.5). Then the risky return is 20% with probability 0.5 and 10% with probability 0.5, and with an expected return of E ( r ) = 5%. The certainty equivalent must satisfy ln (500, CE) = 1 2 ln (600, 000) + 1 ln (450, 000) 2 which implies that CE = 19, 615 It follows then that the risk-free return is 1 + r f = 519, , 000 = The return risk premium is π r = 5% 3.92% = 1.08% Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 52 / 66
53 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 53 / 66
54 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion CARA Utility Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA): absolute risk aversion is the same at every wealth level Every CARA utility function is a monotone affine transform of the exponential utility function u (w) = e αw where α is a constant and equal to the absolute risk aversion Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 54 / 66
55 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion No Wealth Effects With CARA Utility With CARA utility there are no wealth effects Assuming that E ( Z ) = 0, we have that u (w π) = E [u ( w + Z )] Calculating the two sides yields u (w π) = e αw e απ and u ( w + Z ) = e αw e α Z Taking expectations and equating gives e απ = E ( e α Z ), from which it follows that π = 1 α ln E( e α Z ) Hence, an investor with CARA utility will pay the same to avoid a fair gamble no matter what her initial wealth might be Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 55 / 66
56 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Normally Distributed Bet If the gamble Z is Gaussian, then the risk premium can be calculated more explicitly Recall that if x is Gaussian with mean µ and variance σ 2, then E ( e x) = e µ+ 1 2 σ2 Now we have x = α Z which has zero mean and variance α 2 σ 2 z ; thus the risk premium becomes π = 1 2 ασ2 z Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 56 / 66
57 Constant Relative Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 57 / 66
58 Constant Relative Risk Aversion It is easy to show that ρ is the coefficient of relative risk aversion of the power utility function Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 58 / 66 CRRA Utility Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA): relative risk aversion is the same at every wealth level Any CRRA utility function has decreasing absolute risk aversion as α (w) = ρ (w) /w Any monotone CRRA utility function is a monotone affine transform of one of the following functions: Log utility: u (w) = log w Power utility: u (w) = 1 γ wγ γ < 1, γ = 0 A more convenient formulation of power utility is u (w) = w1 ρ 1 ρ ρ = 1 γ > 0, ρ = 1
59 Constant Relative Risk Aversion Properties of CRRA Utility Functions Log utility has constant relative risk aversion equal to 1 An investor with power utility is said to be more risk averse than a log-utility investor if ρ > 1 and to be less risk averse if ρ < 1 The fraction of wealth a CRRA-utility investor would pay to avoid a gamble that is proportional to initial wealth is independent of her wealth Log utility is a limiting case of power utility obtained by taking ρ 1 (by l Hôpital s rule) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 59 / 66
60 Quadratic Utility Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 60 / 66
61 Quadratic Utility Definition and Properties Quadratic utility takes the form u (w) = w b 2 w2 b > 0 The marginal utility of wealth is u (w) = 1 bw, and is positive only when b < 1/w Thus, this utility function makes sense only when w < 1/b, and the point of maximum utility, 1/b, is called the bliss point The absolute and relative risk aversion coefficients are α (w) = b 1 bw and ρ (w) = bw 1 bw It has increasing absolute risk aversion, an unattractive property Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 61 / 66
62 Quadratic Utility Quadratic Utility and Mean-Variance Preferences Quadratic utility has a special importance in finance as it implies mean-variance preferences Since all derivatives of order higher than 2 are equal to zero, the investor s expected utility becomes See Appendix E [ u ( w) ] = u ( E ( w) ) u ( E ( w) ) Var ( w) Specifically, E [ u ( w) ] = µ b 2 ( σ 2 + µ 2) For any probability distribution of wealth, the expected utility depends only on the mean and variance of wealth Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 62 / 66
63 APPENDIX Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 63 / 66
64 Some Important Definitions and Results Concavity and Jensen s Inequality Definition (Concavity) A function f is concave if, for any x and y and any λ (0, 1), f ( λx + (1 λ) y ) λf (x) + (1 λ) f (y). If the inequality is strict, the function is strictly concave. Theorem (Jensen s inequality) Let f be a concave function on the interval (a, b), and x be a random variable such that Pr [ x (a, b)] = 1. Provided that the expectations E ( x) and E [f ( x)] exist, E [ f ( x) ] f ( E ( x) ). Moreover, if f is strictly concave and Pr [ x = E ( x)] = 1, then the inequality is strict. Return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 64 / 66
65 Some Important Definitions and Results Taylor Expansion of a Function Definition (Taylor Expansion of a Function) Let f (x) be a real- or complex-valued function, which is infinitely differentiable at a point x 0. Then the function can be written as a power series, called the Taylor expansion of the function, as f (x) = f (x 0 ) + f (x 0 ) 1! + f (x 0 ) 3! (x x 0 ) 3 + (x x 0 ) + f (x 0 ) 2! (x x 0 ) 2 + Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 65 / 66
66 Some Important Definitions and Results Taylor Expansion for the Mean of a Random Variable Theorem (Taylor Expansion for the Mean of a Random Variable) Let x be a random variable with mean µ and variance σ 2 (both finite), and let f be a twice differentiable function. Then the expected value of f ( x ) can be approximated as E [ f ( x) ] = f (µ) f (µ) σ 2. Proof. The Taylor expansion of the expected value of f ( x) is E [ f ( x) ] = E [ f (µ) + f (µ) ( x µ) f (µ) ( x µ) 2 ]. The expectation of the term containing the first derivative is zero, thus the expression simplifies to the one presented in the theorem. Return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 66 / 66
Choice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationEconomics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics
Lecture 12: More Uncertainty Economics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics Lecture 12: More on Uncertainty Thursday, October 23, 2008 Last class we introduced choice under uncertainty. Today we will explore
More informationLecture 13: Risk Aversion and Expected Utility
Lecture 13: Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Uncertainty over monetary outcomes Let x denote a monetary outcome. C is a subset of the real line, i.e. [a, b]. A lottery L is a cumulative distribution
More informationDecision & Risk Analysis Lecture 6. Risk and Utility
Risk and Utility Risk - Introduction Payoff Game 1 $14.50 0.5 0.5 $30 - $1 EMV 30*0.5+(-1)*0.5= 14.5 Game 2 Which game will you play? Which game is risky? $50.00 Figure 13.1 0.5 0.5 $2,000 - $1,900 EMV
More informationLecture 11 Uncertainty
Lecture 11 Uncertainty 1. Contingent Claims and the State-Preference Model 1) Contingent Commodities and Contingent Claims Using the simple two-good model we have developed throughout this course, think
More informationAsset Pricing. Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion. June 20, 2006
Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion June 20, 2006 Measuring Risk Aversion Utility function Indifference Curves U(Y) tangent lines U(Y + h) U[0.5(Y + h) + 0.5(Y h)] 0.5U(Y + h) + 0.5U(Y h) U(Y
More information.4 120 +.1 80 +.5 100 = 48 + 8 + 50 = 106.
Chapter 16. Risk and Uncertainty Part A 2009, Kwan Choi Expected Value X i = outcome i, p i = probability of X i EV = pix For instance, suppose a person has an idle fund, $100, for one month, and is considering
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More informationAn Introduction to Utility Theory
An Introduction to Utility Theory John Norstad j-norstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org March 29, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract A gentle but reasonably rigorous introduction to utility
More informationCHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS
CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS PROBLEM SETS 1. (e). (b) A higher borrowing is a consequence of the risk of the borrowers default. In perfect markets with no additional
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationLecture 10 - Risk and Insurance
Lecture 10 - Risk and Insurance 14.03 Spring 2003 1 Risk Aversion and Insurance: Introduction To have a passably usable model of choice, we need to be able to say something about how risk affects choice
More informationPDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/29354
More informationRegret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance *
Regret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance * Yoichiro Fujii, Osaka Sangyo University Mahito Okura, Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts Yusuke Osaki, Osaka Sangyo University + Abstract This papers
More information1 Uncertainty and Preferences
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
More informationFund Manager s Portfolio Choice
Fund Manager s Portfolio Choice Zhiqing Zhang Advised by: Gu Wang September 5, 2014 Abstract Fund manager is allowed to invest the fund s assets and his personal wealth in two separate risky assets, modeled
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationIncreasing for all. Convex for all. ( ) Increasing for all (remember that the log function is only defined for ). ( ) Concave for all.
1. Differentiation The first derivative of a function measures by how much changes in reaction to an infinitesimal shift in its argument. The largest the derivative (in absolute value), the faster is evolving.
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 4, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Decisions, utility maximization Strategic form games Best responses
More informationChoice Under Uncertainty
Decision Making Under Uncertainty Choice Under Uncertainty Econ 422: Investment, Capital & Finance University of ashington Summer 2006 August 15, 2006 Course Chronology: 1. Intertemporal Choice: Exchange
More informationLecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty
Lecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty 1. Introduction In this lecture we examine the theory of decision-making under uncertainty and its application to the demand for insurance. The undergraduate
More informationDecision Making under Uncertainty
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
More informationarxiv:1112.0829v1 [math.pr] 5 Dec 2011
How Not to Win a Million Dollars: A Counterexample to a Conjecture of L. Breiman Thomas P. Hayes arxiv:1112.0829v1 [math.pr] 5 Dec 2011 Abstract Consider a gambling game in which we are allowed to repeatedly
More informationAn Overview of Asset Pricing Models
An Overview of Asset Pricing Models Andreas Krause University of Bath School of Management Phone: +44-1225-323771 Fax: +44-1225-323902 E-Mail: a.krause@bath.ac.uk Preliminary Version. Cross-references
More informationLecture 15. Ranking Payoff Distributions: Stochastic Dominance. First-Order Stochastic Dominance: higher distribution
Lecture 15 Ranking Payoff Distributions: Stochastic Dominance First-Order Stochastic Dominance: higher distribution Definition 6.D.1: The distribution F( ) first-order stochastically dominates G( ) if
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INVESTMENT PROCESS
I International Symposium Engineering Management And Competitiveness 2011 (EMC2011) June 24-25, 2011, Zrenjanin, Serbia RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INVESTMENT PROCESS Bojana Vuković, MSc* Ekonomski fakultet
More informationA Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand. April 2005. Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East Lansing, MI 48824
A Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand April 2005 Donald J. Meyer Jack Meyer Department of Economics Department of Economics Western Michigan University Michigan State University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East
More informationChapter 25: Exchange in Insurance Markets
Chapter 25: Exchange in Insurance Markets 25.1: Introduction In this chapter we use the techniques that we have been developing in the previous 2 chapters to discuss the trade of risk. Insurance markets
More informationChapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Questions for Review 1. What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse? Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers? A risk-averse
More informationDECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY:
DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: Models and Choices Charles A. Holloway Stanford University TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE DARMSTADT Fachbereich 1 Gesamtbibliothek Betrtebswirtscrtaftslehre tnventar-nr. :...2>2&,...S'.?S7.
More informationMidterm Exam:Answer Sheet
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a risk-free and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
More information88 CHAPTER 2. VECTOR FUNCTIONS. . First, we need to compute T (s). a By definition, r (s) T (s) = 1 a sin s a. sin s a, cos s a
88 CHAPTER. VECTOR FUNCTIONS.4 Curvature.4.1 Definitions and Examples The notion of curvature measures how sharply a curve bends. We would expect the curvature to be 0 for a straight line, to be very small
More informationc 2008 Je rey A. Miron We have described the constraints that a consumer faces, i.e., discussed the budget constraint.
Lecture 2b: Utility c 2008 Je rey A. Miron Outline: 1. Introduction 2. Utility: A De nition 3. Monotonic Transformations 4. Cardinal Utility 5. Constructing a Utility Function 6. Examples of Utility Functions
More informationMTH6120 Further Topics in Mathematical Finance Lesson 2
MTH6120 Further Topics in Mathematical Finance Lesson 2 Contents 1.2.3 Non-constant interest rates....................... 15 1.3 Arbitrage and Black-Scholes Theory....................... 16 1.3.1 Informal
More informationA Simpli ed Axiomatic Approach to Ambiguity Aversion
A Simpli ed Axiomatic Approach to Ambiguity Aversion William S. Neilson Department of Economics University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-0550 wneilson@utk.edu March 2009 Abstract This paper takes the
More informationAnalyzing the Demand for Deductible Insurance
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18:3 3 1999 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Analyzing the emand for eductible Insurance JACK MEYER epartment of Economics, Michigan State
More information3 Introduction to Assessing Risk
3 Introduction to Assessing Risk Important Question. How do we assess the risk an investor faces when choosing among assets? In this discussion we examine how an investor would assess the risk associated
More informationCAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models
CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models CAPM, Arbitrage, Linear Factor Models 1/ 41 Introduction We now assume all investors actually choose mean-variance e cient portfolios. By equating these investors
More informationSOME ASPECTS OF GAMBLING WITH THE KELLY CRITERION. School of Mathematical Sciences. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3168
SOME ASPECTS OF GAMBLING WITH THE KELLY CRITERION Ravi PHATARFOD School of Mathematical Sciences Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3168 In this paper we consider the problem of gambling with
More informationChapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model
Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal
More informationRisk and Uncertainty. Vani K Borooah University of Ulster
Risk and Uncertainty Vani K Borooah University of Ulster Basic Concepts Gamble: An action with more than one possible outcome, such that with each outcome there is an associated probability of that outcome
More informationRank dependent expected utility theory explains the St. Petersburg paradox
Rank dependent expected utility theory explains the St. Petersburg paradox Ali al-nowaihi, University of Leicester Sanjit Dhami, University of Leicester Jia Zhu, University of Leicester Working Paper No.
More informationThe Expectation Maximization Algorithm A short tutorial
The Expectation Maximiation Algorithm A short tutorial Sean Borman Comments and corrections to: em-tut at seanborman dot com July 8 2004 Last updated January 09, 2009 Revision history 2009-0-09 Corrected
More informationCapital Structure. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Capital Structure Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Debt and Equity There are two main types of financing: debt and equity. Consider a two-period world with dates 0 and 1. At
More informationInfinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Ù
Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Page 1 Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Ù Introduction 1 Discounting the future 2 Interpreting the discount factor 3 The average discounted payoff 4
More informationName. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions.
Name Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions. Question 1. A firm has a production function F (x 1, x 2 ) = ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. It is a price
More informationPreferences. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory. Boston College. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Preferences 1 / 20
Preferences M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory Boston College M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Preferences 1 / 20 Preference Relations Given any two consumption bundles x = (x 1, x 2 ) and y = (y 1, y 2 ), the
More informationOverview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model
Overview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model 1 September 004 A. Introduction and assumptions The classical normal linear regression model can be written
More information1 Portfolio mean and variance
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman Portfolio mean and variance Here we study the performance of a one-period investment X 0 > 0 (dollars) shared among several different assets. Our criterion for measuring
More informationStocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing
Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing Ralf Korn 1 and L. C. G. Rogers 2 Abstract In the Black-Scholes model, any dividends on stocks are paid continuously, but in reality dividends
More informationRisk Aversion. Expected value as a criterion for making decisions makes sense provided that C H A P T E R 2. 2.1 Risk Attitude
C H A P T E R 2 Risk Aversion Expected value as a criterion for making decisions makes sense provided that the stakes at risk in the decision are small enough to \play the long run averages." The range
More informationOnline Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents
Online Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents William H. Sandholm January 6, 22 O.. Imitative protocols, mean dynamics, and equilibrium selection In this section, we consider
More informationSolution: The optimal position for an investor with a coefficient of risk aversion A = 5 in the risky asset is y*:
Problem 1. Consider a risky asset. Suppose the expected rate of return on the risky asset is 15%, the standard deviation of the asset return is 22%, and the risk-free rate is 6%. What is your optimal position
More informationFollow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send email to: permissions@pupress.princeton.edu
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Ariel Rubinstein: Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, c 2006, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part
More informationDecision Theory. 36.1 Rational prospecting
36 Decision Theory Decision theory is trivial, apart from computational details (just like playing chess!). You have a choice of various actions, a. The world may be in one of many states x; which one
More informationFinancial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Financial Markets Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Trading and Price Formation This line of the literature analyzes the formation of prices in financial markets in a setting
More informationA Log-Robust Optimization Approach to Portfolio Management
A Log-Robust Optimization Approach to Portfolio Management Dr. Aurélie Thiele Lehigh University Joint work with Ban Kawas Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-0757983
More informationMoreover, under the risk neutral measure, it must be the case that (5) r t = µ t.
LECTURE 7: BLACK SCHOLES THEORY 1. Introduction: The Black Scholes Model In 1973 Fisher Black and Myron Scholes ushered in the modern era of derivative securities with a seminal paper 1 on the pricing
More informationEconomics 206 Problem Set 1 Winter 2007 Vincent Crawford
Economics 206 Problem Set 1 Winter 2007 Vincent Crawford This problem set, which is optional, covers the material in the first half of the course, roughly in the order in which topics are discussed in
More information3. The Economics of Insurance
3. The Economics of Insurance Insurance is designed to protect against serious financial reversals that result from random evens intruding on the plan of individuals. Limitations on Insurance Protection
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Ordinal preference theory Harald Wiese University of Leipzig Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 1 / 68 Part A. Basic decision and preference theory 1 Decisions
More informationChapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions
Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions We saw in the text that utility functions and indifference curves are different ways to represent a consumer s preferences. Calculus can
More information4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence
4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence 267 32. {v 1, v 2 }, where v 1, v 2 are collinear vectors in R 3. 33. Prove that if S and S are subsets of a vector space V such that S is a subset of S, then
More informationCHAPTER 6 RISK AND RISK AVERSION
CHAPTER 6 RISK AND RISK AVERSION RISK AND RISK AVERSION Risk with Simple Prospects Risk, Speculation, and Gambling Risk Aversion and Utility Values Risk with Simple Prospects The presence of risk means
More informationMoral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Principal-Agent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More informationLecture 1: Asset Allocation
Lecture 1: Asset Allocation Investments FIN460-Papanikolaou Asset Allocation I 1/ 62 Overview 1. Introduction 2. Investor s Risk Tolerance 3. Allocating Capital Between a Risky and riskless asset 4. Allocating
More informationECON 40050 Game Theory Exam 1 - Answer Key. 4) All exams must be turned in by 1:45 pm. No extensions will be granted.
1 ECON 40050 Game Theory Exam 1 - Answer Key Instructions: 1) You may use a pen or pencil, a hand-held nonprogrammable calculator, and a ruler. No other materials may be at or near your desk. Books, coats,
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS Systems of Equations and Matrices Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a
More informationWHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES. A D Wilkie, United Kingdom. Summary and Conclusions
WHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES A D Wilkie, United Kingdom Summary and Conclusions The question of whether a risk averse investor might be the more willing to hold shares rather
More informationChapter 5 Financial Forwards and Futures
Chapter 5 Financial Forwards and Futures Question 5.1. Four different ways to sell a share of stock that has a price S(0) at time 0. Question 5.2. Description Get Paid at Lose Ownership of Receive Payment
More informationNotes on Uncertainty and Expected Utility
Notes on Uncertainty and Expected Utility Ted Bergstrom, UCSB Economics 210A December 10, 2014 1 Introduction Expected utility theory has a remarkably long history, predating Adam Smith by a generation
More informationChapter 5 Risk and Return ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS
Chapter 5 Risk and Return ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS 5-1 a. Stand-alone risk is only a part of total risk and pertains to the risk an investor takes by holding only one asset. Risk is
More informationCertainty Equivalent in Capital Markets
Certainty Equivalent in Capital Markets Lutz Kruschwitz Freie Universität Berlin and Andreas Löffler 1 Universität Hannover version from January 23, 2003 1 Corresponding author, Königsworther Platz 1,
More informationMATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0-534-40596-7. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column
More informationEconomics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Problem Set 2 1/20/10
Dirk Bergemann Department of Economics Yale University s by Olga Timoshenko Economics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Problem Set 2 1/20/10 This problem set is due on Wednesday, 1/27/10. Preliminary
More information1. a. (iv) b. (ii) [6.75/(1.34) = 10.2] c. (i) Writing a call entails unlimited potential losses as the stock price rises.
1. Solutions to PS 1: 1. a. (iv) b. (ii) [6.75/(1.34) = 10.2] c. (i) Writing a call entails unlimited potential losses as the stock price rises. 7. The bill has a maturity of one-half year, and an annualized
More informationSolving Systems of Linear Equations
LECTURE 5 Solving Systems of Linear Equations Recall that we introduced the notion of matrices as a way of standardizing the expression of systems of linear equations In today s lecture I shall show how
More informationDefinition and Properties of the Production Function: Lecture
Definition and Properties of the Production Function: Lecture II August 25, 2011 Definition and : Lecture A Brief Brush with Duality Cobb-Douglas Cost Minimization Lagrangian for the Cobb-Douglas Solution
More information6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 15: Repeated Games and Cooperation
6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 15: Repeated Games and Cooperation Daron Acemoglu and Asu Ozdaglar MIT November 2, 2009 1 Introduction Outline The problem of cooperation Finitely-repeated prisoner s dilemma
More informationEconomics of Insurance
Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow
More informationLesson 5. Risky assets
Lesson 5. Risky assets Prof. Beatriz de Blas May 2006 5. Risky assets 2 Introduction How stock markets serve to allocate risk. Plan of the lesson: 8 >< >: 1. Risk and risk aversion 2. Portfolio risk 3.
More informationALMOST COMMON PRIORS 1. INTRODUCTION
ALMOST COMMON PRIORS ZIV HELLMAN ABSTRACT. What happens when priors are not common? We introduce a measure for how far a type space is from having a common prior, which we term prior distance. If a type
More informationCovariance and Correlation
Covariance and Correlation ( c Robert J. Serfling Not for reproduction or distribution) We have seen how to summarize a data-based relative frequency distribution by measures of location and spread, such
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closed-book exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationMath 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces
Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces Dan Collins The textbook defines a subspace of a vector space in Chapter 4, but it avoids ever discussing the notion of a quotient space. This is understandable
More informationOptimal demand management policies with probability weighting
Optimal demand management policies with probability weighting Ana B. Ania February 2006 Preliminary draft. Please, do not circulate. Abstract We review the optimality of partial insurance contracts in
More informationProspect Theory Ayelet Gneezy & Nicholas Epley
Prospect Theory Ayelet Gneezy & Nicholas Epley Word Count: 2,486 Definition Prospect Theory is a psychological account that describes how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. These may
More informationEconomics 200B Part 1 UCSD Winter 2015 Prof. R. Starr, Mr. John Rehbeck Final Exam 1
Economics 200B Part 1 UCSD Winter 2015 Prof. R. Starr, Mr. John Rehbeck Final Exam 1 Your Name: SUGGESTED ANSWERS Please answer all questions. Each of the six questions marked with a big number counts
More informationChapter 11 Monte Carlo Simulation
Chapter 11 Monte Carlo Simulation 11.1 Introduction The basic idea of simulation is to build an experimental device, or simulator, that will act like (simulate) the system of interest in certain important
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND MOTIVATION. Over the last decades, risk analysis and corporate risk management activities have
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND MOTIVATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION Over the last decades, risk analysis and corporate risk management activities have become very important elements for both financial
More informationMulti-variable Calculus and Optimization
Multi-variable Calculus and Optimization Dudley Cooke Trinity College Dublin Dudley Cooke (Trinity College Dublin) Multi-variable Calculus and Optimization 1 / 51 EC2040 Topic 3 - Multi-variable Calculus
More information4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: Single-Period Market
More informationHolding Period Return. Return, Risk, and Risk Aversion. Percentage Return or Dollar Return? An Example. Percentage Return or Dollar Return? 10% or 10?
Return, Risk, and Risk Aversion Holding Period Return Ending Price - Beginning Price + Intermediate Income Return = Beginning Price R P t+ t+ = Pt + Dt P t An Example You bought IBM stock at $40 last month.
More informationChoice Under Uncertainty Insurance Diversification & Risk Sharing AIG. Uncertainty
Uncertainty Table of Contents 1 Choice Under Uncertainty Budget Constraint Preferences 2 Insurance Choice Framework Expected Utility Theory 3 Diversification & Risk Sharing 4 AIG States of Nature and Contingent
More informationNo-Betting Pareto Dominance
No-Betting Pareto Dominance Itzhak Gilboa, Larry Samuelson and David Schmeidler HEC Paris/Tel Aviv Yale Interdisciplinary Center Herzlyia/Tel Aviv/Ohio State May, 2014 I. Introduction I.1 Trade Suppose
More informationLife Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Life Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans Challenges for defined contribution plans While Eastern Europe is a prominent example of the importance of defined
More information0.0.2 Pareto Efficiency (Sec. 4, Ch. 1 of text)
September 2 Exercises: Problem 2 (p. 21) Efficiency: p. 28-29: 1, 4, 5, 6 0.0.2 Pareto Efficiency (Sec. 4, Ch. 1 of text) We discuss here a notion of efficiency that is rooted in the individual preferences
More informationA Simple Model of Price Dispersion *
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 112 http://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/wpapers/2012/0112.pdf A Simple Model of Price Dispersion
More informationYou Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races
You Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races Pierre-André Chiappori, Amit Gandhi, Bernard Salanié and Francois Salanié March 14, 2008 What Do We Know About Risk Preferences? Not that
More information