2. Information Economics


 Silas Jennings
 4 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many situations, though, information is not available to all the agents. The most important case is when some sort of asymmetric information prevails. In such cases, different agents have access to different information Examples of the above are: labor markets, used goods markets (lemons), insurance markets, and contractual relationships. The main phenomena that arise from these situations (and that lead to market failures) are: Adverse Selection: the actions of informed agents affect uninformed agents in an adverse way Moral Hazard: the actions of informed agents are unobservable to the uninformed agents (maybe through noisy signals only)
2 2. Information Economics Plan 2.1 Adverse Selection Information and Efficiency Signaling Screening 2.2 Moral Hazard Symmetric Information Asymmetric Information
3 2. Information Economics In all cases Market for car insurance Firms F = {1, 2,...,F } all identical All firms sell the same insurance policy at the price p per monetary unit insured All firms produce insurance policies at zero cost Individuals I = {1, 2,...,I} All individuals have the same initial wealth ω All individuals have a continuous, strictly increasing, and strictly concave utility function over wealth, u(.). When facing a risky situation individuals behave as VonNeumann Morgenstern expected utility maximizers Individuals differentiate from each other in the probabilities they get involved in a car accident, π i [0,1] π i is the probability that individual i I has a car accident.
4 2. Information Economics 2.1 Adverse Selection Roughly speaking, adverse selection is a phenomena that occurs when the actions of informed agents affect the market outcome in such a way that the bad products (or customers) are more likely to be selected as the result of the actions of the uninformed agents To study this phenomena we use the market for car insurance with the following simplifying assumptions: All car accidents are equal: the monetary loss is of L monetary units in any case All insurance companies offer the same policy that pays L in case of an accident and 0 otherwise. Since p is the price per monetary unit insured, the cost of buying one unit of such policy is of pl
5 The symmetric case Suppose first (for comparison purposes) that all firms know the accident risks of all individuals (π 1,...,π I ) Firms seek to maximize expected profits by choosing the level of coverage offered at the unit price p i to each individual i I. (Since firms are able to distinguish between individuals, they can set different prices across individuals) Let x f i denote the amount of monetary units that firm f F offers to individual i I. Then, expected profits for firm f are given by E(Π(x f i )) = p ix f i π ix f i = (p i π i )x f i i I Clearly, p i > π i p i < π i p i = π i E(Π) > 0 x f i = E(Π) < 0 x f i = 0 E(Π) = 0 x f i = any quantity Hence, the firm f s coverage supply function for individual i I is
6 p i π i Individuals seek to maximize their expected utility by choosing the level of coverage to buy at the unit price p i Let x i denote the amount of monetary units that individual i I wants to buy Then, expected utility for individual i I is given by E(u(x)) = π i u i (ω L + x i p i x i ) + (1 π i )u i (ω p i x i ) x f i Expected utility maximization ( E(u(x))/ x = 0) yields π i u i(ω L + x i p i x i )(1 p i ) + (1 π i )u i(ω p i x i )( p i ) = 0
7 Rearranging, π i (1 p i )u i(ω L + x i p i x i ) = p i (1 π i )u i(ω p i x i ) (1) From here, (i) If p i = π i Then 1 becomes u i(ω L + x i p i x i ) = u i(ω p i x i ) and since u() is strictly concave we have that ω L + x i p i x i = ω p i x i So, p i = π i x i = L
8 (ii) If p i > π i Then π i (1 p i ) < p i (1 π i ) In such case, the maximization condition 1 holds if and only if u i(ω L + x i p i x i ) > u i(ω p i x i ) and since u() is strictly concave we have that ω L + x i p i x i < ω p i x i So, p i > π i x i < L (iii) If p i < π i Then π i (1 p i ) > p i (1 π i ) In such case, the maximization condition 1 holds if and only if u i(ω L + x i p i x i ) < u i(ω p i x i )
9 and since u() is strictly concave we have that ω L + x i p i x i > ω p i x i So, p i < π i x i > L Therefore, the demand for coverage is decreasing as a function of the unit price p i p i π i L x i
10 Therefore, the unique equilibrium exists when p i = π i ( i I) p i π i L x i In this equilibrium: All individuals buy full insurance (x i = L i I) Any firm is willing to supply such coverage at the price p i = π i
11 We know (see JehleReny for details) that it is efficient.
12 Asymmetric Information Suppose now that firms do not know (π 1,...,π I ) Firms know the maximum and minimum probabilities, [π, π] and a probability distribution G so that G(π) = p(π i π) Since firms can not distinguish among individuals they must set a unique price p At the equilibrium price p (if any), E(Π(p )) = 0 where E(Π(p)) = (p E(π))x For simplicity, we will assume that x = L or x = 0 If price is set as p = E(π) = ˆ π π πdg(π)
13 then, individuals i I such that π i < E(π) will not buy and, therefore, E(Π) < 0 Expectation must be conditional on individuals that buy. The incentives condition for individuals to buy the insurance is u(ω pl) π i u(ω L) + (1 π i )u(ω) That is, an individual with accident probability π i will buy the insurance at price p if and only if π i u(ω) u(ω pl) u(ω) u(ω L) h(p) Thus, p is an equilibrium price if p = E(π π h(p )) that is, p = ˆ π h(p ) πdg(π)
14 Then, E(Π) = (p ˆ π h(p ) πdg(π))l Does such p exist? Consider g(p) = E(π π h(p))
15 Notice the g(p) is well defined for p π, that is, h( π) π. To see this suppose, on the contrary, that h( π) > π, that is, u(ω) u(ω πl) u(ω) u(ω L) > π Then, u(ω) u(ω πl) > π(u(ω) u(ω L)) or πu(ω L) + (1 π)u(ω) > u(ω πl) (2) Notice now that (ω πl) = π(ω L) + (1 π)(ω). Replacing on the righthand side of (2) yields πu(ω L) + (1 π)u(ω) > u( π(ω L) + (1 π)(ω)) which occurs whenever u( )is a convex function, thus contradicting the assumption of risk aversion (u( ) strictly concave ) Clearly, if p [π, π]then g(p) [π, π]. Thus, g(p) : [π, π] [π, π]
16 Also, since h(p) is increasing, g(p) must be nondecreasing. Hence, we can conclude that g(p) has a fixed point p such that p = g(p ), that is, p = E(π π h(p )) (such p might not be unique) We will show that this is not efficient (contrary to the symmetric information case) by means of one example
17 Example Let G be the uniform distribution over the whole unit interval, that is, G U[π,π] = U[0,1] In this case, we have that Hence, in equilibrium Notice that h(1) = 1. Hence, That is, g(p) = 1 + h(p) 2 p = 1 + h(p ) 2 1 = p = 1
18 is an (the) equilibrium. In this equilibrium, only individuals such that π i h(p ) will buy the insurance. Since p = 1 h(p ) = 1 we have that only individuals with π i = 1 will buy the insurance. All the other individuals (π i < 1) will remain uninsured! This is clearly inefficient as we know (from the symmetric case) that individuals are strictly better off when the are fully covered (at a fair price) than uninsured while, companies make zero profits in any case
19 Partial Solutions Although the inefficiencies brought by information asymmetries are difficult to solve completely, there are, in some cases, ways to mitigate the effect. The main point is that both, individuals and companies, will benefit if information about individuals risk were available to both sides of the market In practice, the strategic behavior of firms and individuals works towards the reduction of such asymmetry. The main problem, then, will be credibility. Signaling First we will study the situation in which low risk individuals try to differentiate themselves from high risk individuals by proposing a pair coveragepremium to the company Screening Second, we will analyze the case in which companies try to tell apart low risk individuals from high risk by offering a menu of policies We will see that, in both situations, individuals are correctly identified in some cases while in other cases they are not.
20 Signaling There are two types of risk averse individuals: High risk individuals, with probability π of having an accident Low risk individuals, with probability π of having an accident There is a proportion λ of high risk individuals, which is known to everybody Each individual proposes a policy (B,p) to the company, where: B is the proposed coverage p is the proposed price per monetary unit covered After each proposal (B, p) by an individual, the risk neutral insurance company chooses whether to Accept (A) or Reject (R) the proposal.
21 The Insurance Signaling Game Nature λ 1 λ High Risk Individual Low Risk Individual (B, p) (B, p) (B, p ) (B, p ) Insurance Company A R A R Insurance Company A R A R Let (B,p) and (B, p) be the policies proposed by the high and low risk individuals respectively Let σ(b, p) {A,R} be the reaction function of the insurance company let µ(b,p) be the insurance company s beliefs that the consumer who proposed (B,p) is a high risk individual.
22 Definition. Pure Strategy Sequential Equilibrium A pair of policy proposals (B,p) and (B,p) by the high and low risk individuals, together with a reaction function σ(b, p) and the beliefs µ(b, p) by the firm, constitute a pure strategy sequential equilibrium of the insurance signaling game if: (i) Given σ(b,p), (B, p) and (B,p) maximize the high and low risk individuals expected utility respectively, (ii) the insurance company s beliefs µ(b.p) satisfies the Bayes rules, that is, (a) µ(b,p) [0, 1] for any proposal (B,p), (b) (B,p) (B,p) µ(b,p) = 1, µ(b,p) = 0 (c) (B, p) = (B, p) µ(b,p) = µ(b, p) = λ, (iii) for any policy proposal (B, p), the insurance company s reaction function σ(b, p) maximizes its expected profits given its beliefs µ(b,p)
23 Definition. Separating and Pooling Signaling Equilibria A pure strategy sequential equilibrium of the insurance signaling game is Separating if (B, p) (B, p) while is Pooling otherwise Theorem 4.1 Separating Equilibrium Characterization The policies (B, p) and (B,p) are proposed by the high and low risk individuals respectively and accepted by the insurance company in some separating equilibrium if and only if (i) (L, π) = (B,p) (B,p) (ii) p π (iii) E(u(B, p)) max (B,p) E(u(B,p)) s.t. p = π (iv) E(u(B,p)) E(u(B, p))
24 Theorem 4.2 Pooling Equilibrium Characterization The policy (B,p) is proposed by both, the high and low risk individuals, and accepted by the insurance company in some pooling equilibrium if and only if (i) E(u(B,p)) max (B,p) E(u(B,p)) s.t. p = π (ii) E(u(B,p)) E(u(L,π)) (iii) p λπ + (1 λ)π
25 Screening There are two types of risk averse individuals: High risk individuals, with probability π of having an accident Low risk individuals, with probability π of having an accident There is a proportion λ of high risk individuals, which is known to everybody Each risk neutral insurance companies offer a finite menu of policies of the form (B,p) Nature moves second and determines, according to the probability λ, which individual is looking for insurance The selected individual moves last by choosing a policy from one of the two insurance companies lists
26 Graphical Representation Consider the following picture representing the situation of one individual with risk π ω accident Actuarilly Fair Line 45 ω Slope = 1 π π ω πl ω L ω L ω πl ω ω no accident (1 π)ω + π(ω L) 1 π
27 There are two states, {no accident, accident} The probability of having an accident is π The Expected Income E(ω) = (1 π)ω + π(ω L) = ω πl determines the Actuarially Fair line, with slope 1 π π Any point in the actuarilly fair line yields the same expected income, ω πl If the price per monetary unit insured is actuarilly fair (that is, p = π), then the actuarilly fair line acts as a Budget Constrain
28 The full insurance allocation is in the actuarilly fair line. At this allocation: The firm makes zero profits The individual maximizes the expected utility Hence, it corresponds to the symmetric information equilibrium
29 Pooling Equilibrium The two individuals have different risks. Therefore, the situation ω accident Actuarilly Fair Line 45 Slope = 1 π π ω L Slope = 1 π π ω ω no accident In a Pooling Equilibrium both risk types buy the same policy (B p, p p )
30 In equilibrium, firms must make zero expected profits. That is, if E(π) = λπ + (1 λ)π is the expected risk, then the pooling equilibrium price must be p p = E(π) Hence, in the pooling equilibrium, the equilibrium policy (B p, p p ) must lie in the expected actuarilly fair line
31 ω accident Slope = 1 E(π) E(π) 45 Slope = 1 π π ω L Slope = 1 π π ω ω no accident Notice now, that for any policy (B,p), we have that MRS(ω na,ω a ) < MRS(ω na,ω a )
32 where ω na = ω pb ω a = ω pb L + B This is so because, MRS(ω na, ω a ) = u (ω pb)(1 π) u (ω pb L+B)π Hence, MRS(ω na, ω a ) = u (ω pb)(1 π) u (ω pb L+B)π MRS(ω na, ω a ) MRS(ω na, ω a ) = 1 π π π 1 π < 1 which shows that the indifference curve of low risk individuals is more steep than that of high risk individuals. This is known as the singlecross property.
33 ω accident Slope = 1 E(π) E(π) 45 Slope = 1 π π ω L Slope = 1 π π A u B u ω ω no accident Notice now that only points (policies) like A can be pooling equilibria because Is on the expected actuarilly fair line and so firms make zero profits Both individuals are better off at A than not having any insurance (initial situation) But... Suppose that another insurance company offers a policy like point B
34 High risk individuals do still prefer A to B But low risk individuals will switch to the new company offering B! This is profitable for the company offering this policy as it attracts only low risk individuals and at a price that is above the risk π This is called cream skimming After this, no firm will remain offering A as only high risk individuals will buy it and then the expected actuarilly fair line will no longer be valid Consequently, the pooling equilibrium does never exist. It is always disrupted by a rival policy that skims the low risk individuals from the pool
35 Consider the following figure Separating Equilibrium ω accident Slope = 1 π π 45 A A ū ω L Slope = 1 π π ω ω no accident Ù Notice that, if A is offered to high risk individuals, then A is the best separating equilibrium policy that can be offered to low risk individuals because It is on the actuarilly fair line of the low risk individuals, so firms make zero profits
36 Other policies in the same actuarilly fair line which would be better for low risk individuals would also attract high risk individuals and, hence, would not be separating Therefore, A is the policy that determines the separating constraint Consequently, a separating equilibrium could be The menu of policies A, A is offered High risk individuals choose A while low risk individuals prefer A Both policies produce zero profits to the insurance companies as each lies on the actuarilly fair line of each group Can it be disrupted???
37 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Moral Hazard (danger because of immoral behavior) is a situation that appears because of the null incentives that insured individuals have to drive as carefully as without any insurance. The information problem is that insurance companies can not monitor all individuals to determine how much effort they put on driving. Incentives is the only way to induce individuals to behave properly. This is known as the principalagent problem. To study this phenomena we use the same market for car insurance with the following simplifying assumptions: Car accidents may result in different losses, No accident corresponds to the case l = 0 l {0,1, 2,...,L}. There is only one consumer. His probability of having an accident with a loss of l depends on how much effort e he puts on driving, π l (e) > 0. For simplicity, effort can be either high (e = 1) or low (e = 0). For completeness, L l=0 π l(e) = 1 for any e {0,1} Individuals are assumed to dislike effort. In this sense, d(e) will measure the disutility of effort (d(1) > d(0))
38 2. Information Economics There is only one insurance company that can observe the severity of the accident (l) but can not observe the level of effort (e). Consequently, the company can only link the benefit in case of an accident to its severity l (not to the effort), Thus, policies offered by the company are of the form (p,b 0,B 1...,B L ) where p is the premium paid by the individual to the company in exchange of the title to receive B l monetary units if an accident with a loss l occurs First, we will study the ideal case of symmetric information in which the company can tie each contingent benefit B l to the level of effort e
39 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Assumption π l (0) > π l (1) for any l {1,...,L} Assumption The Monotone Likelihood Ratio is strictly increasing in l π l (0) π l (1)
40 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Symmetric case If the company can verify the level of effort e {0,1} by the individual, the it can set up the policy so that it pays benefit B l only if some particular level of effort is observed. The maximization problem of the company illustrates how, in fact, the company may act as if it could choose the level of effort max e,p,b 0,B 1,...,B L p L l=0 π l (e)b l s.t. L l=0 π l(e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) u where u denotes the individual s reservation utility. Given a particular level of effort e, standard maximization techniques produce the following Lagrangian
41 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard L = p [ L L ] π l (e)b l + λ π l (e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) u l=0 whose First Order Conditions are l=0 L [ p = 1 λ L ] l=0 π l(e)u (ω p l + B l ) = 0 (3) L = π l (e) + λπ l (e)u (ω p l + B l ) = 0 ( l) (4) B l L λ = L l=0 π l(e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) u 0 (5) where (5) holds with equality when λ 0
42 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Notice that: Condition (3) is implied by the (L + 1) conditions in (4) Hence, we have (L + 2) independent equations (at most) and (L + 3) unknowns. We can thus normalize B 0 = 0 Conditions (4) imply that λ 0 and, thus, u (ω p l + B l ) = 1 λ l Hence, it must be the case that (B l l) is constant for all l {0, 1,...,L} Since λ 0, condition (5) must hold with equality. That is, L π l (e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) u = 0 l=0
43 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard but since (B l l) is constant, this can be written as u(ω p l + B l ) L π l (e) = d(e) + u l=0 that is, u(ω p l + B l ) = d(e) + u Notice now that, because of the normalization B 0 = 0, the equation above depends only on p and thus p = ω u 1 (d(e) + u) Finally, since B 0 0 = 0 and we know that B l l must be constant for any l, it must be the case that B l = l for any loss l {0, 1,...,L} and for any effort level e {0, 1} we have fixed. Thus, in (the symmetric) equilibrium, the individual is fully insured against any loss
44 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Asymmetric Case Now we assume (interesting case) that the company can not observe the individual s effort. The problem for the company is to set up a policy in such a way that not only the the individual prefers to exert a particular level of effort rather than receiving his reservation utility (Individual rationality constraint). Now, it must be in the interest of the individual to exert the level of effort that the company prefers, which is known as the incentive compatible constraint The company s problem becomes:
45 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard max e,p,b 0,B 1,...,B L p L l=0 π l (e)b l s.t. and L l=0 π l(e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) u L l=0 π l(e)u(ω p l + B l ) d(e) L l=0 π l(e )u(ω p l + B l ) d(e ) where e, e {0, 1} and e e As before (symmetric case) we solve the maximization problem for each level of effort e {0,1} and then the company will set up the policy that induces its desired level of effort on the side of the individual
46 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Optimal policy for e = 0 Recall that in the symmetric case (without the Incentives Compatible Constraint), the optimal policy for e = 0 would be to choose (p,b 0,...,B L ) to satisfy u(ω p) = d(0) + u B l = l l = 0, 1,...,L (6) Notice that: 1. Adding the [IC] constraint the company s profits can not go up 2. Hence, if the solution of (6) satisfies the [IC] constraint then it must also be optimal in this asymmetric case 3. And... indeed it does satisfy the [IC] constraint because if e = 0 then the [IC] constraint boils down to d(0) d(1)
47 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard which is true by assumption Hence, choosing a policy that maximized the company s profits and that induces the consumer to choose the low effort means choosing the same policy as in the symmetric case!
48 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard In this case, the corresponding Lagrangian is Optimal policy for e = 1 L = p + β [ L L ] π l (1)B l + λ π l (1)u(ω p l + B l ) d(1) u l=0 l=0 [ L ( L )] π l (1)u(ω p l + B l ) d(1) π l (0)u(ω p l + B l ) d(1) l=0 l=0
49 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard and the corresponding First Order Conditions, L [ p = 1 λ L ] l=0 (π l(1) + β(π l (1) π l (0))) u (ω p l + B l ) = 0 (7) L = B l π l (1) + (λπ l (1) + β(π l (1) π l (0))) u (ω p l + B l ) = 0 ( l) (8) L λ = L l=0 π l(1)u(ω p l + B l ) d(1) u 0 (9) L β = L l=0 (π l(1) π l (0)) u(ω p l + B l ) + d(0) d(1) 0 (10) where (9) and (10) hold with equality if λ 0 and β 0 respectively
50 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard As before, condition (7) is implied by the L + 1 conditions in (8) so that we have one degree of freedom to set B 0 = 0. Also, (8) can be written as 1 u (ω p l + B l ) = λ + β [ 1 π ] l(0) π l (1) Notice that if β = 0 then (11) would imply that (ω p l + B l ) is constant and then (10) will simplify to d(0) d(1), which is not true!. Hence, β 0 (In fact, because of the KuhnTucker conditions, β > 0) Also, the Monotone Likelihood property implies that l, l such that π l (0) > π l (1) and π l (0) < π l (1). This means that if λ = 0 then the right hand side of (11) would take positive and negative values (because we know that β 0). But, if we pay attention to the left hand side of (11), we see that it is always positive. Hence it must be the case that λ 0 Finally, because β > 0, the Monotone Likelihood Ratio property implies that the right hand side of (11) is strictly decreasing in l. Hence, u (ω p l + B l ) must be strictly increasing and (ω p l + B l ) strictly decreasing (if the individual is risk avers). (11)
51 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Therefore, the optimal policy for the company when e = 1 must have the following property l B l isstrictly increasing (12) Since B 0 = 0, (12) implies that B l < l l > 0 Intuitively, this is the incentive for the individual to put high effort
52 2. Information Economics 2.2 Moral Hazard Final Remarks In both cases (symmetric and asymmetric), we have found what is the best policy for the company at each level of effort. Which one is the optimal level of effort depends on each particular situation Suppose that in the symmetric case the best for the company is that the individual chooses e = 0. Then, the optimal policy is to sell full insurance to the individual. And this will also be the optimal policy in the asymmetric case because when e = 0 because the expected profits in this case can not be higher than the expected profits in the symmetric case since we have one more constraint. Hence, if such policy was efficient in the symmetric case, it is also efficient in the asymmetric case Suppose now that in the symmetric case the best for the company is that the individual chooses e = 1. Then, in order to induce the individual to actually exert a high effort, the company must set up a policy in which the real loss to the individual (l B l ) increases with the severity of the accident. This cannot be efficient since in the symmetric case we have seen that the company offers full coverage (B l = l) for any level l regardless the effort
Choice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationEconomics of Insurance
Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow
More informationInsurance. Michael Peters. December 27, 2013
Insurance Michael Peters December 27, 2013 1 Introduction In this chapter, we study a very simple model of insurance using the ideas and concepts developed in the chapter on risk aversion. You may recall
More informationProblem Set 9 Solutions
Problem Set 9 s 1. A monopoly insurance company provides accident insurance to two types of customers: low risk customers, for whom the probability of an accident is 0.25, and high risk customers, for
More informationLecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model
Lecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model Allan CollardWexler April 19, 2012 CoWritten with John Asker and Vasiliki Skreta 1 Reading for next week: Make Versus Buy in
More informationAdverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton
Preliminary and Incomplete Please do not Quote Adverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton Washington University, Department of Economics Date: 4/24/01 Abstract Several
More informationNotes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov).
Notes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov). These payments are called premiums. Insurer promises to make a
More informationApplied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004
Applied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004 Outline 1 Uncertainty and asset prices 2 Informational efficiency  rational expectations, random walks 3 Asymmetric information  lemons,
More informationOnline Appendix Feedback Effects, Asymmetric Trading, and the Limits to Arbitrage
Online Appendix Feedback Effects, Asymmetric Trading, and the Limits to Arbitrage Alex Edmans LBS, NBER, CEPR, and ECGI Itay Goldstein Wharton Wei Jiang Columbia May 8, 05 A Proofs of Propositions and
More informationLecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty
Lecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty 1. Introduction In this lecture we examine the theory of decisionmaking under uncertainty and its application to the demand for insurance. The undergraduate
More informationOptimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk
Optimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk Alary D. Bien F. TSE (LERNA) University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we consider an adverse selection problem
More informationLabor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 3: Education, Selection, and Signaling
Labor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 3: Education, Selection, and Signaling Daron Acemoglu MIT November 3, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Education, Selection, and Signaling November 3, 2011. 1 / 31 Introduction
More informationSecond degree price discrimination
Bergals School of Economics Fall 1997/8 Tel Aviv University Second degree price discrimination Yossi Spiegel 1. Introduction Second degree price discrimination refers to cases where a firm does not have
More informationChapter 23: Asymmetric Information
Chapter 23: Asymmetric Information Asymmetric Information Adverse Selection Moral Hazard Lemons Market SecondBest Mechanism Designs Principal Agent Market Failure Signaling Screening Insurance Employer/
More informationECO 305 FALL 2003 December 4
ECO 305 FALL 2003 December 4 ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION CONCEPTS Moral Hazard One party s (costly to it) actions affect risky outcomes (exercising care to reduce probability or size of loss, making effort
More informationWork incentives and household insurance: Sequential contracting with altruistic individuals and moral hazard
Work incentives and household insurance: Sequential contracting with altruistic individuals and moral hazard Cécile Aubert Abstract Two agents sequentially contracts with different principals under moral
More informationMoral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 PrincipalAgent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More informationAt t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem:
Internet Appendix for A Model of hadow Banking * At t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem: max ( D, I H, I L, H, L, TH, TL ) [R (I H + T H H ) + p H ( H T H )] + [E ω (π ω ) A
More informationInstitute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich. Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459. Working Paper No. 229
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459 Working Paper No. 229 On the Notion of the First Best in Standard Hidden Action Problems Christian
More informationNonExclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons
NonExclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons Andrea Attar Thomas Mariotti François Salanié October 2007 Abstract In order to check the impact of the exclusivity regime on equilibrium allocations,
More informationLecture Note 16 Adverse Selection, Risk Aversion and Insurance Markets.
Lecture Note 16 Adverse Selection, Risk Aversion and Insurance Markets. 14.03/14003 Applied Microeconomic Theory and Public Policy, Fall 2010 David Autor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology November
More informationManagerial Economics
Managerial Economics Unit 10: Information Asymmetries WinterEbmer Johannes Kepler University Linz Winter Term 2012 Managerial Economics: Unit 10  Information Asymmetries 1 / 28 Information asymmetries
More informationEquilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information
Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information By: Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz Presented by Benjamin S. Barber IV, Xiaoshu Bei, Zhi Chen, Shaiobi
More informationPart 2: Screening and Signaling in Games with Incomplete Information.
Lecture 9 Part 2: Screening and Signaling in Games with Incomplete Information. 1 Lecture Outline Screening and signaling incentives arise in games where uncertainty is exogenous and some players are better
More informationALMOST COMMON PRIORS 1. INTRODUCTION
ALMOST COMMON PRIORS ZIV HELLMAN ABSTRACT. What happens when priors are not common? We introduce a measure for how far a type space is from having a common prior, which we term prior distance. If a type
More informationExplaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 22: 121 134 (1997) c 1997 The Geneva Association Explaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection VIRGINIA R. YOUNG AND MARK J. BROWNE School
More informationInsurance and Public Pensions : (b) Adverse Selection
Insurance and Public Pensions : (b) Adverse Selection Adverse selection is said to occur if potential buyers of insurance know their own probabilities of loss better than do insurance companies. So suppose
More informationChapter 18. Asymmetric Information. The buyer needs a hundred eyes, the seller not one. George Herbert (1651)
Chapter 18 Asymmetric Information The buyer needs a hundred eyes, the seller not one. George Herbert (1651) Chapter 18 Outline 18.1 Problems Due to Asymmetric Information 18.2 Responses to Adverse Selection
More informationLecture Notes. 1 What is Asymmetric Information and why it matters for Economics?
Lecture Notes The most important development in economics in the last forty years has been the study of incentives to achieve potential mutual gain when the parties have different degrees of knowledge.
More informationScreening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan
Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan 1. Introduction The paper looks at an economic environment where borrowers have some
More informationWhy is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013)
Why is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013) Introduction The United States government is, to a rough approximation, an insurance company with an army. 1 That is
More informationChapter 7. Sealedbid Auctions
Chapter 7 Sealedbid Auctions An auction is a procedure used for selling and buying items by offering them up for bid. Auctions are often used to sell objects that have a variable price (for example oil)
More informationWhat is Adverse Selection. Economics of Information and Contracts Adverse Selection. Lemons Problem. Lemons Problem
What is Adverse Selection Economics of Information and Contracts Adverse Selection Levent Koçkesen Koç University In markets with erfect information all rofitable trades (those in which the value to the
More informationSCREENING IN INSURANCE MARKETS WITH ADVERSE SELECTION AND BACKGROUND RISK. Keith J. Crocker
SCREENING IN INSURANCE MARKETS WIT ADVERSE SEECTION AND BACKGROUND RISK Keith J. Crocker University of Michigan Business School 70 Tappan Street Ann Arbor, MI 4809 and Arthur Snow Department of Economics
More informationDo not open this exam until told to do so.
Do not open this exam until told to do so. Department of Economics College of Social and Applied Human Sciences K. Annen, Winter 004 Final (Version ): Intermediate Microeconomics (ECON30) Solutions Final
More informationInformation asymmetries
Adverse selection 1 Repeat: Information asymmetries Problems before a contract is written: Adverse selection i.e. trading partner cannot observe quality of the other partner Use signaling g or screening
More informationPrices versus Exams as Strategic Instruments for Competing Universities
Prices versus Exams as Strategic Instruments for Competing Universities Elena Del Rey and Laura Romero October 004 Abstract In this paper we investigate the optimal choice of prices and/or exams by universities
More informationWe never talked directly about the next two questions, but THINK about them they are related to everything we ve talked about during the past week:
ECO 220 Intermediate Microeconomics Professor Mike Rizzo Third COLLECTED Problem Set SOLUTIONS This is an assignment that WILL be collected and graded. Please feel free to talk about the assignment with
More informationName. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions.
Name Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions. Question 1. A firm has a production function F (x 1, x 2 ) = ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. It is a price
More information15. Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 15. Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets ADVERSE SELECTION GENERAL ISSUES One party in a trade or contract has advance private information
More informationFinancial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Financial Markets Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Trading and Price Formation This line of the literature analyzes the formation of prices in financial markets in a setting
More informationPrice Discrimination: Part 2. Sotiris Georganas
Price Discrimination: Part 2 Sotiris Georganas 1 More pricing techniques We will look at some further pricing techniques... 1. Nonlinear pricing (2nd degree price discrimination) 2. Bundling 2 Nonlinear
More informationIntroduction. Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection. Problem of individual insurance. Health Economics Bill Evans
Introduction Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection Health Economics Bill Evans Intermediate micro build models of individual, firm and market behavior Most models assume actors fully informed about
More informationECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015
ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 These notes have been used before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1
More informationEconS 503  Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Cheap Talk
EconS 53  Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Cheap Talk. Cheap talk with Stockbrokers (From Tadelis, Ch. 8, Exercise 8.) A stockbroker can give his client one of three recommendations regarding a certain
More informationThe Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance. Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University
\ins\liab\dlirpr.v3a 060607 The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research
More informationFinancial Market Microstructure Theory
The Microstructure of Financial Markets, de Jong and Rindi (2009) Financial Market Microstructure Theory Based on de Jong and Rindi, Chapters 2 5 Frank de Jong Tilburg University 1 Determinants of the
More informationA Simple Model of Price Dispersion *
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 112 http://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/wpapers/2012/0112.pdf A Simple Model of Price Dispersion
More informationCheap Talk : Multiple Senders and Multiple Receivers
Corso di Laurea in Economia indirizzo Models and Methods of Quantitative Economics Prova finale di Laurea Cheap Talk : Multiple Senders and Multiple Receivers Relatore Prof. Piero Gottardi Laureando Arya
More informationOligopoly and Strategic Pricing
R.E.Marks 1998 Oligopoly 1 R.E.Marks 1998 Oligopoly Oligopoly and Strategic Pricing In this section we consider how firms compete when there are few sellers an oligopolistic market (from the Greek). Small
More informationAsymmetric Information in Competitive Markets
Chapter 22 Asymmetric Information in Competitive Markets In our treatment of externalities in Chapter 21, we introduced into our model for the first time an economic force (other than governmentinduced
More informationIn this section, we will consider techniques for solving problems of this type.
Constrained optimisation roblems in economics typically involve maximising some quantity, such as utility or profit, subject to a constraint for example income. We shall therefore need techniques for solving
More informationWorking Paper Series
RGEA Universidade de Vigo http://webs.uvigo.es/rgea Working Paper Series A Market Game Approach to Differential Information Economies Guadalupe Fugarolas, Carlos HervésBeloso, Emma Moreno García and
More informationLoans, Insurance and Failures in the Credit Market for Students
Loans, Insurance and Failures in the Credit Market for Students Elena Del Rey and Bertrand Verheyden December 2009 Version in progress Abstract In the education literature, it is generally acknowledged
More informationPersuasion by Cheap Talk  Online Appendix
Persuasion by Cheap Talk  Online Appendix By ARCHISHMAN CHAKRABORTY AND RICK HARBAUGH Online appendix to Persuasion by Cheap Talk, American Economic Review Our results in the main text concern the case
More informationOptimal demand management policies with probability weighting
Optimal demand management policies with probability weighting Ana B. Ania February 2006 Preliminary draft. Please, do not circulate. Abstract We review the optimality of partial insurance contracts in
More informationLecture 11 Uncertainty
Lecture 11 Uncertainty 1. Contingent Claims and the StatePreference Model 1) Contingent Commodities and Contingent Claims Using the simple twogood model we have developed throughout this course, think
More informationInsurance Markets with Differential Information
Insurance Markets with Differential Information S. Hun Seog [석승훈] Graduate School of Management, KAIST (KGSM) 20743 CheongryangriDong, DongdaemunGu, Seoul, 130722, KOREA Email: seogsh@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr
More informationGame Theory: Supermodular Games 1
Game Theory: Supermodular Games 1 Christoph Schottmüller 1 License: CC Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 1 / 22 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Model 3 Revision questions and exercises 2 / 22 Motivation I several solution
More informationECON4335 The economics of banking Lecture 12, 20/42010: Bank regulation Crisis handling, LenderBorrower Relationship
ECON4335 The economics of banking Lecture 12, 20/42010: Bank regulation Crisis handling, LenderBorrower Relationship Bent Vale, Norges Bank Views and conclusions are those of the lecturer and can not
More informationDemand and supply of health insurance. Folland et al Chapter 8
Demand and supply of health Folland et al Chapter 8 Chris Auld Economics 317 February 9, 2011 What is insurance? From an individual s perspective, insurance transfers wealth from good states of the world
More informationGames of Incomplete Information
Games of Incomplete Information Jonathan Levin February 00 Introduction We now start to explore models of incomplete information. Informally, a game of incomplete information is a game where the players
More informationAdverse selection in health insurance: are first best. contracts impossible?
Adverse selection in health insurance: are first best contracts impossible? David Alary CERPEMSDF, University Paris Dauphine Franck Bien EuRISCO LEGOS, University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note,
More informationYou Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races
You Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races PierreAndré Chiappori, Amit Gandhi, Bernard Salanié and Francois Salanié March 14, 2008 What Do We Know About Risk Preferences? Not that
More informationOn the Existence of Nash Equilibrium in General Imperfectly Competitive Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information
analysing existence in general insurance environments that go beyond the canonical insurance paradigm. More recently, theoretical and empirical work has attempted to identify selection in insurance markets
More informationImperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products
Imperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products available 2. characteristics or relative qualities of
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 4, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Decisions, utility maximization Strategic form games Best responses
More informationFinancial Institutions I: The Economics of Banking
Financial Institutions I: The Economics of Banking Prof. Dr. Isabel Schnabel Gutenberg School of Management and Economics Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Summer term 2011 V4 1/30 I. Introduction II.
More informationFinance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model These notes consider the singleperiod model in Kyle (1985) Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica 15,
More informationResearch Summary Saltuk Ozerturk
Research Summary Saltuk Ozerturk A. Research on Information Acquisition in Markets and Agency Issues Between Investors and Financial Intermediaries An important dimension of the workings of financial markets
More informationWhy Plaintiffs Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts
Why Plaintiffs Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts Winand Emons 1 Claude Fluet 2 1 Department of Economics University of Bern, CEPR, CIRPEE 2 Université du Québec à Montréal,
More informationAdverse selection and moral hazard in health insurance.
Adverse selection and moral hazard in health insurance. Franck Bien David Alary University Paris Dauphine November 10, 2006 Abstract In this paper, we want to characterize the optimal health insurance
More informationModeling Insurance Markets
Modeling Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren Harvard April, 2015 Nathaniel Hendren (Harvard) Insurance April, 2015 1 / 29 Modeling Competition Insurance Markets is Tough There is no wellagreed upon model
More informationNot Only What But also When: A Theory of Dynamic Voluntary Disclosure
Not Only What But also When: A Theory of Dynamic Voluntary Disclosure Ilan Guttman, Ilan Kremer, and Andrzej Skrzypacz Stanford Graduate School of Business September 2012 Abstract The extant theoretical
More informationPRIVATE AND SOCIAL INCENTIVES TO DISCRIMINATE IN OLIGOPOLY
PRIVATE AND SOCIAL INCENTIVES TO DISCRIMINATE IN OLIGOPOLY by Norbert Schulz Universität Würzburg First version 3.08.99 This version 2.09.00 Abstract In an oligopoly model with switching costs firms have
More informationMoral Hazard and Repeated Insurance Contracts
Moral Hazard and Repeated Insurance Contracts Chris Robinson The University of Western Ontario Bingyong Zheng Shanghai University of Finance and Economics October 30, 2006 Abstract We develop a model of
More informationThe gain from insurance (full information)
The gain from insurance (full information) W 2 U U 1 E W W 2 W 45 W c E(W ) W 1 W 1 Figure 1: Demand for insurance Risk aversion: u (EW ) >Eu(W ), Risk averse individuals dislike uncertainty Assumptions:
More informationSELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester
SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester Consider an insurance market say, for insurance against accidental injuries. Agents face different levels of accident risk,
More informationMULTIPLE LOSSES, EX ANTE MORAL HAZARD, AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR UMBRELLA POLICIES
C The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2005, Vol. 72, No. 4, 525538 MULTIPLE LOSSES, EX ANTE MORAL HAZARD, AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR UMBRELLA POLICIES Michael Breuer ABSTRACT Under certain cost conditions
More informationWhat we ll be discussing
Teaching programmes: Master of Public Health, University of Tromsø, Norway HEL3007 Health Economics and Policy Master of Public Health, Monash University, Australia ECC5979 Health Economics Master of
More informationMultivariable Calculus and Optimization
Multivariable Calculus and Optimization Dudley Cooke Trinity College Dublin Dudley Cooke (Trinity College Dublin) Multivariable Calculus and Optimization 1 / 51 EC2040 Topic 3  Multivariable Calculus
More informationThe Stewardship Role of Accounting
The Stewardship Role of Accounting by Richard A. Young 1. Introduction One important role of accounting is in the valuation of an asset or firm. When markets are perfect one can value assets at their market
More informationThe Impact of Interlinked Insurance and Credit Contracts on Financial Market Deepening and Small Farm Productivity
The Impact of Interlinked Insurance and Credit Contracts on Financial Market Deepening and Small Farm Productivity June 2011 Summary Twin puzzles Ample evidence that uninsured risk depresses small holder
More informationOnline Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents
Online Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents William H. Sandholm January 6, 22 O.. Imitative protocols, mean dynamics, and equilibrium selection In this section, we consider
More informationCapital Structure. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Capital Structure Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Debt and Equity There are two main types of financing: debt and equity. Consider a twoperiod world with dates 0 and 1. At
More informationWeb Appendix for ReferenceDependent Consumption Plans by Botond Kőszegi and Matthew Rabin
Web Appendix for ReferenceDependent Consumption Plans by Botond Kőszegi and Matthew Rabin Appendix A: Modeling Rational ReferenceDependent Behavior Throughout the paper, we have used the PPE solution
More informationIntermediate Microeconomics (22014)
Intermediate Microeconomics (22014) I. Consumer Instructor: Marc TeignierBaqué First Semester, 2011 Outline Part I. Consumer 1. umer 1.1 Budget Constraints 1.2 Preferences 1.3 Utility Function 1.4 1.5
More informationReducing Asymmetric Information in Insurance Markets: Cars with Black Boxes. Lilia Filipova, Peter Welzel
Reducing Asymmetric Information in Insurance arkets: ars with Black Boxes ilia Filipova, Peter elzel Beitrag Nr. 270, Februar 2005 Reducing Asymmetric Information in Insurance arkets: ars with Black Boxes
More informationPreferences. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory. Boston College. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Preferences 1 / 20
Preferences M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory Boston College M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Preferences 1 / 20 Preference Relations Given any two consumption bundles x = (x 1, x 2 ) and y = (y 1, y 2 ), the
More informationLiability Insurance as Protection Against Legal Error. Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University. and
lipale.v2a 071708 Liability Insurance as Protection Against Legal Error Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University and Paul D. Thistle * University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research was supported
More informationA Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand. April 2005. Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East Lansing, MI 48824
A Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand April 2005 Donald J. Meyer Jack Meyer Department of Economics Department of Economics Western Michigan University Michigan State University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East
More informationOptimal health insurance contract : can moral hazard incresase indemnity?
Optimal health insurance contract : can moral hazard incresase indemnity? David Alary SDFi, University Paris Dauphine Franck Bien LEGOS, University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we generalize the
More informationOnline Supplementary Material
Online Supplementary Material The Supplementary Material includes 1. An alternative investment goal for fiscal capacity. 2. The relaxation of the monopoly assumption in favor of an oligopoly market. 3.
More informationECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 March 23 ADVERSE SELECTION SCREENING AND SIGNALING. EXAMPLE 1 FAILURE OF EQUILIBRIUM Akerlof s Lemons
ECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 March 23 ADVERSE SELECTION SCREENING AND SIGNALING EXAMPLE 1 FAILURE OF EQUILIBRIUM Akerlof s Lemons Private used car market Car may be worth anywhere between
More informationRegret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance *
Regret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance * Yoichiro Fujii, Osaka Sangyo University Mahito Okura, Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts Yusuke Osaki, Osaka Sangyo University + Abstract This papers
More informationLecture 6: Price discrimination II (Nonlinear Pricing)
Lecture 6: Price discrimination II (Nonlinear Pricing) EC 105. Industrial Organization. Fall 2011 Matt Shum HSS, California Institute of Technology November 14, 2012 EC 105. Industrial Organization. Fall
More informationDefinition and Properties of the Production Function: Lecture
Definition and Properties of the Production Function: Lecture II August 25, 2011 Definition and : Lecture A Brief Brush with Duality CobbDouglas Cost Minimization Lagrangian for the CobbDouglas Solution
More informationPractice Set #4 and Solutions.
FIN469 Investments Analysis Professor Michel A. Robe Practice Set #4 and Solutions. What to do with this practice set? To help students prepare for the assignment and the exams, practice sets with solutions
More information