Choice under Uncertainty


 Hope Edwards
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory Discuss different attitudes towards risk Analyze the protfolio choice and demand for insurance of risk averse agents Slide 2 Page 1
2 Description of Risky Alternatives Denote Y the set of all possible outcomes. Y could be the decision maker's feasible consumption bundles or the monetary payoffs (a case we will study extensively later). We assume that the probabilities with which certain outcomes occur are objectively known, e.g. the probabilities with which a red number on the spin of an unbiased roulette wheel may occur. Slide 3 The Model Consider s states of the world Restrict y s R y s represents money in a given state of the world Characterize attitudes toward risk with properties of v(y s ) Assume that v is increasing and continuous (Last point implies that expected utility is increasing in probability on highest money prize) Slide 4 Page 2
3 A Standard Prospect Consider s states of the world A standard prospect P is given by with where s is interpreted as the probability of outcome y s occurring. A standard prospect (also called lottery) gives us the probability distribution over outcomes (most often interpreted as different levels of income). Slide 5 Examples of Standard Prospects P 1 1/2 1/ P 2 1/2 1/4 1/ Positive weight on a finite number of outcomes P 1 = (½, ½, 100, 20) and P 2 = (½, ¼, ¼, 100, 40,0) Slide 6 Page 3
4 Compound Prospects It can be the case that outcomes themselves are uncertain: outcomes of a prospect themselves are prospects. For example, there is a probability that you get a certain job and if you get a specific job there is a probability that you will do well and get promoted. This would then be a compound prospect. Slide 7 Compound Prospects Example Job A 1/4 h 3/4 Job B 1/6 No promo promo 5/6 1/3 No promo 2/3 promo Slide 8 Page 4
5 Reduction to Standard Prospect We can also find a reduced probability distribution, e.g. the distribution over getting promoted or not. In order to get the probabilities of these two outcomes we need to multiply the probability of getting a promo in a job with the probability of getting this job in the first place. Then add all the probabilities of getting a promotion in all jobs together to find out what the probability of getting a promotion is. Put more generally, a reduced prospect is a prospect that yields the same ultimate distribution over outcomes as the compound prospect. Slide 9 The Consequentialist Premise Rational Equivalence Assume that the consumer s preferences are defined on compound prospects, but the consumer is indifferent between any two compound prospects that reduce to the same standard prospect. Slide 10 Page 5
6 Rationality and Continuity It is clear that we need to assume that preferences, again denoted by, are rational (complete and transitive) or no utility representation is possible. Again we need more to ensure a utility representation exists, namely Continuity. Continuity guarantees that we can draw indifference curves, that is we will be able to find small enough changes in the probability distribution of a prospect that will make the person indifferent to the original prospect. Slide 11 Independence Axiom The major new axiom The preference on the space of standard prospects P satisfies the independence axiom, if for every and every Slide 12 Page 6
7 Independence AxiomIntuition Mix each of the two prospects with a third one, then the preference ordering of the two resulting mixtures does not depend on the particular third prospect used. You can think of it as follows. Consider two compound prospects ((1/2), (1/2), P, P ) and ((1/2), (1/2), P, P ) : When head comes up there will either be P or P, depending which compound prospect you face, but if tail comes up there will always be P. So the individual should choose between the two prospects based on her preference for P and P only. Slide 13 Independence Axiom The independence axiom is at the heart of the theory of choice under uncertainty. It is different from any axiom we have encountered in utility theory so far: it exploits in a fundamental manner the structure of uncertainty present in the model. In experiments, this is the axiom most often violated. Slide 14 Page 7
8 Existence vonneumann Morgenstern proved an early representation theorem With rationality, continuity and independence, there exists a function that assigns a number v to each outcome y s s = 1,,S, such that, for and if and only if if and only if Slide 15 Expected Utility Function This function capturing the relationship between the distribution of utility in any given state and the probability distribution is called Expected Utility Function. This is an appropriate name given that we sum up the products of probability of each state occurring and the utility in each state. Similarity to expected value, but obviously not the same!!! Slide 16 Page 8
9 Domains The utility function v(y s ) is defined on the domain of possible outcomes Y. It tells us how a person feels once an outcome has occurred. E.g. this is the utility when you have $100 for sure. The expected utility function is defined on the space of probability distributions. Slide 17 Ordinal v.s. Cardinal The key result is that v is less flexible than it was in ordinal consumer theory: in fact, it implies that expected utility is cardinal. Cardinal has notion of degree of difference: twice as fast, half as warm. Temperature is cardinal: there is a real sense in which something can be twice as hot. There is also a real sense in which an event is twice as likely as another event! Slide 18 Page 9
10 Example to show that cardinality matters Let Y = {0,5,9} and v(y) = y and compare the prospects P = ( 1, 1 ;0,9) 2 2 and P' = (1;5) then, since is less than, for this consumer Slide 19 An Example Now transform v into This function says that v(y) = [v(y)] 3 So: Slide 20 Page 10
11 Since Affine Transformation S s=1 S ( ) π s v ' y s = π s (αv y s s=1 S ( ) + β) = α π s v(y s ) + π s β s=1 S s=1 Therefore if so does S π s=1 s ( αv ( y s ) + β) represents for all Slide 21 Properties of EU: Risk Aversion Definition: The consumer is said to be strictly risk averse if the consumer always prefers the amount for sure to the same amount in expectation of a prospect. That is, let expected value consumer And strictly risk averse consumer be a prospect with, then for a risk averse for all P with π s <1. Risk aversion is equivalent to the concavity of v(y s ). Slide 22 Page 11
12 Other attitudes towards Risk The consumer is said to be: risk neutral if the consumer is always indifferent between the expected value of a prospect to the prospect itself. risk loving if the consumer always prefers a prospect to its expected value. Slide 23 Certainty Equivalent For given preferences it is convenient to define: The certainty equivalent of P,, as the amount for sure at which the agent is indifferent between this amount and the expected value of the lottery: Slide 24 Page 12
13 Risk Aversion and Certainty Equivalent r Slide 25 Some equivalent statements The agent is risk averse v(y s ) is concave for all prospects Slide 26 Page 13
14 An Example: Insurance Consider a risk averse consumer facing a possible loss of wealth. Let her preferences be represented by v(y s ), a strictly concave and twice differentiable function in y s. Denote her initial total wealth w, the potential loss L, and the probability of loss no loss occurs with probability Slide 27 Insurance Assume that the market for insurance is competitive, and that insurance is priced linearly at $p per unit. That is, if the consumer buys $20 worth of coverage, it will cost $p *20. Denote the amount of coverage the consumer buys q. The consumer must decide on the amount of coverage to buy. That is, she must solve max π q 1 v(w pq) + π 2 v(w L + q pq) Slide 28 Page 14
15 Insurance The first order necessary and sufficient condition for an interior solution ( q (0, w p ) v '(w L + q pq)π 2 (1 p) v '(w pq)π 1 p = 0 ) is so π 2 (1 p) π 1 p = v '(w pq) v '(w L + q pq) Slide 29 Zero profit insurance In a competitive market, insurers can enter whenever there is positive expected profit, so in equilibrium which implies that Slide 30 Page 15
16 Fair insurance Zero profit implies that insurance is actuarially fair, The solution for the consumer is thus 1 = v '(w pq) v '(w L + q pq) Slide 31 Full Coverage Case If v(y s ) is strictly concave and increasing, then v (y s ) takes on lower values the higher y. This implies that v '(w L + q pq) = v '(w pq) iff w L + q pq = w pq so q* = L. strictly concave utility function  remember that when the second derivative of a function is strictly negative, the value of the first derivative changes everywhere in the domain: thus if the first derivative is equal at two points, they must be the same point. Slide 32 Page 16
17 Insurance Market is imperfectly competitive Insurance companies make profit, that is Consumer pays more than the actuarially fair premium. Consumer demands less than full coverage. Slide 33 Less Than Full Coverage With FOC becomes π 2 (1 p) = π 1 p v '(w pq) v '(w L + q pq) π 2 (1 p) < 1 π 1 p v '(w pq) < v '(w L + q pq) w pq > w L + q pq q * < L. Slide 34 Page 17
18 Risk Aversion and Indifference Curves Slide 35 Risk Aversion and Indifference Curves Suppose only one bad thing can happen with probability 2, but depending on the actions of the individual the amount of money in the two states will vary. Can draw an indifference curve diagram in statecontingent space, that is money if bad thing happens on yaxis and money if good thing happens on xaxis. Slide 36 Page 18
19 StateContingent income space y 2 y 1 = y 2 45 degree line is the certainty line: no matter what happens, income is the same y 1 Slide 37 Indifference curves in statecontingent space We find indifference curves the same way as always. Hold expected utility fixed, see what combinations of (y 1, y 2 ) give us same expected utility. Slide 38 Page 19
20 Slope of indifference Curves Slide 39 Slope of indifference Curves The slope of the indifference curves at the 45degree line is Slide 40 Page 20
21 Shape of Indifference curves Note that V is an increasing function of y 1 and y 2, because v(y s ) is increasing. This means the better sets must lie to the right of an indifference curve. Are the better sets convex? The better sets are convex iff v(y s ) is concave. Slide 41 Convex Better sets ( ) = π 1 v ( y 1 ) + π 2 v ( y 2 ) ( ) V y 1, y 2 v y 1 π dy 1 2 y = 1 dy 1 v y 2 π 2 y 2 d 2 y 2 ( ) 2 = d y 1 Need v2 y 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) v 2 y 1 π 1 y 1 v y 2 π 2 y 2? 0 ( ) 0 v ( y ( ) 2 s ) concave. y 1 Slide 42 Page 21
22 Indifference curves and attitudes towards risk For strictly risk averse person, indifference curves in statecontingent space are strictly convex (better sets are strictly convex). For risk neutral person, indifference curves are convex (straight lines, more specifically) For risk loving person, indifference curves are strictly concave (worse sets are strictly convex). No matter what the attitude towards risk, the slope of an indifference curve where it intersects with the 45 degree (certainty line) is equal to the risk ratio. Slide 43 StateContingent income space y 2 y 1 = y 2 Better set Indifference curve and better set for a strictly risk averse person Slope=  π 1 / π 2 y 1 Slide 44 Page 22
23 Example: Insurance Demand in Graph y in bad state w  pl w  L Optimal bundle with actuarially fair premium Income bundle w/o insurance w  pl w y in good state Slide 45 Insurance Demand in Graph y in bad state Optimal bundle with not actuarially fair premium wl+qpq (1p)q w  L Income bundle w/o insurance pq wpq w y in good state Slide 46 Page 23
24 Demand for Insurance Conclusion Strictly risk averse people are willing to take on risks. If the premium is not actuarially fair, strictly risk averse people will not be fully covered and therefore they accept some risk. Slide 47 Conclusion We have investigated choice under uncertainty. We made the assumption that individuals are expected utility maximizers (crucial assumption is Independence axiom). Cardinal properties on the utility function give us attitudes toward risk. Most often individuals are assumed to be risk averse, i.e. they have a decreasing marginal utility of money. We found out that risk averse people are willing to take on risk. Slide 48 Page 24
25 Risk Aversion and Demand for Risky Assets Degrees of absolute/relative risk aversion and their impact on portfolio choice Slide 49 Demand for Risky Asset Will allow for continuous probability distribution Compare investment decisions of people with different wealth levels/degrees of risk aversion Slide 50 Page 25
26 Risk Aversion The definition of risk aversion can be rewritten. An agent is risk averse if for all F ( ) v(y) df(y) v y df(y) This inequality is also known as Jensen s inequality and is the defining property of a concave function. Risk aversion is equivalent to the concavity of v( ). Slide 51 Demand for Risky Asset An asset is a divisible claim to a financial return in the future. Suppose that there are two assets, a safe asset with a return of 1 dollar per dollar invested and a risky asset with a random return of z dollar per dollar invested. The random return z has a distribution function F(z) that we assume satisfies zdf(z)>1; that is, its mean return exceeds that of the safe asset. Slide 52 Page 26
27 Demand for Risky Asset An individual has initial income M to invest, which can be divided in any way between the two assets. Let and denote the amounts of wealth invested in the risky and the safe asset, respectively. Thus, for any realization z of the random return, the individual's portfolio (, ) pays z+. Of course, we must also have + =M. Assume, i.e. the mean return of the risky assets exceeds the return of the safe asset. Slide 53 Demand for Risky Asset How does the individual choose and? max α,β 0 ( ) df ( z) v α z + β s.t. α + β = M. Or equivalently max 0 α M v ( α z + M α ) df ( z) Slide 54 Page 27
28 Demand for Risky Asset FOC is necessary and sufficient. Note that at α=0 we have We conclude α*>0. Slide 55 Demand for Risky Asset Strictly risk averse people are willing to take on risks: They will invest a fraction of their wealth in risky assets if their expected return exceeds the return of the safe asset. We also saw that with the demand for insurance: if the premium is not actuarially fair, strictly risk averse people will not be fully covered and therefore they accept some risk. Slide 56 Page 28
29 Degree of Risk Aversion How can we quantify risk aversion? One idea is size of, but this is changed by affine transformations, so is clearly wrong The Arrow  Pratt measure of (absolute) risk aversion Note that the ArrowPratt measure is independent of affine transformations of v(y). Slide 57 Logarithmic Utility Example of decreasing absolute risk aversion Slide 58 Page 29
30 Comparison across Individuals Given two utility functions v 1 (y) and v 2 ( y), the following statements are equivalent: 1. Person 2 is more risk averse than person A(y, v 2 ) A(y, v 1 ) for every y. 3. There exists an increasing concave function ( ) such that v 2 (y)= (v 1 (y)) at all y; that is, v 2 ( ) is a concave transformation of v 1 ( ). 4. y c (F, v 2 ) y c (F, v 1 ) for any F( ). 5. Whenever person 2 finds a prospect at least as good as a riskless outcome y, then person 1 finds that same prospect at least as good as y Slide 59 Demand for Risky Asset Now we have two individuals and one is more risk averse than the other. If person 2 is more risk averse than person 1, person 2 will invest less in the risky asset than person 1. Slide 60 Page 30
31 Demand for Risky Asset Recall FOC for asset demand problem and assume M> 1 *>0 : For person 2 we can write the FOC for the asset demand problem as : Slide 61 Demand for Risky Asset Next we show that at 1 *, FOC for person 2 is already negative. This means by decreasing we can make person 2 better off. This is true because and Slide 62 Page 31
32 Comparison across Wealth Levels Suppose M goes up for individual 1. How does this change person 1 s demand for the risky asset? We have Since 1 * is a function of M, and FOC must also hold at new wealth level, we have ( ( )) ( z 1) df ( z) = 0 v 1 ' α * 1 ( M) z + M α * 1 M ( ( )) ( z 1) z 1 v 1 '' α * 1 ( M) z + M α * 1 M ( ) α * M 1 ( ) M + 1 df z ( ) = 0 Slide 63 Comparison across Wealth Levels A( y)v' y ( )( z 1) ( z 1) α * 1 ( M ) A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 α * 1 ( M ) M + A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1)dF z ( ) = 0 M +1 df z df ( z) ( ) = 0 Slide 64 Page 32
33 A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 α * 1 ( M ) where A( y)v' y Note the following M * M df ( z) = α 1 M ( )( z 1) 2 df ( z) > 0 On the other hand, the sign of A ( α * 1 ( M) ( z 1) + M)v ' α * 1 M depends on A(y). ( ) A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 df ( ( ) ( z 1) + M) ( z 1) df ( z) ( z) Slide 65 Note that if A(y) =c, where c is a constant, i.e. A(y) is independent of y and therefore M, we can write ( ( ) + M) ( z 1) df c v ' α * 1 ( M) z 1 Since by the FOC for optimal investment v ' α * 1 ( M) ( z 1) + M ( ) z 1 ( ) df ( z) = 0 ( z) = 0 This implies ( ) c α * 1 M M * M ( ) α 1 M = 0 v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 df ( z) + 0 = 0 Slide 66 Page 33
34 Note that if A (y)<0, i.e. decreasing absolute risk aversion A( ( α * 1 ( M )( z 1) + M ))v' ( α * 1 ( M )( z 1) + M )( z 1)dF z ( ) < 0 Since by the FOC for optimal investment v ' α * 1 ( M) ( z 1) + M ( ) z 1 ( ) df ( z) = 0 This implies α * 1 ( M ) M ( ) * M α 1 M > 0 A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 df ( z) > 0 Slide 67 Note that if A (y)>0, increasing absolute risk aversion A( ( α * 1 ( M )( z 1) + M ))v' ( α * 1 ( M )( z 1) + M )( z 1)dF z ( ) > 0 Since by the FOC for optimal investment v ' α * 1 ( M) ( z 1) + M ( ) z 1 ( ) df ( z) = 0 This implies α * 1 ( M ) M ( ) * M α 1 M < 0 A( y)v' ( y) ( z 1) 2 df ( z) < 0 Slide 68 Page 34
35 Comparison across Wealth Levels If we have decreasing risk aversion, then the individual will demand more of the risky asset as her wealth goes up. Again we can capture the idea of decreasing risk aversion in different ways. The basic idea is that you can look at a given wealth level and add an increment z. Then the individual behaves with respect to z differently given the initial wealth. Slide 69 The Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion Log utility is example of Constant Relative Risk Aversion preferences (CRRA) Slide 70 Page 35
36 Example: Asset demand as proportion of wealth with CRRA Let v(y) = lny. Show that as the wealth of this person goes up, the same proportion of wealth is invested in the risky asset. Slide 71 CRRA and constant proportion of wealth Let /M =, that is is the fraction of income invested in the risky asset. Slide 72 Page 36
37 CRRA and constant proportion of wealth Note that ( z 1) ( γz +1 γ ) γmz + M γm ( ) 2 therefore ( ) ( z 1) 2 M γ M M γmz + M γm ( ) 2 ( ) γ M M = 0. df ( z) = 1 M df ( z) = 0 z 1 γmz + M γm ( ) df z ( ) = 0 With CRRA, a constant proportion of wealth will be invested in the risky asset. Slide 73 CRRA and constant proportion of wealth CRRA is often used in finance theory: It has the implication that no matter how wealth is distributed between individuals, the portfolio decisions of individuals in terms of budget shares do not vary. Slide 74 Page 37
38 Conclusion We have investigated choice under uncertainty. We made the assumption that individuals are expected utility maximizers (crucial assumption is Independence axiom). Cardinal properties on the utility function give us attitudes toward risk. Most often individuals are assumed to be risk averse, i.e. they have a decreasing marginal utility of money. We found out that risk averse people are willing to take on risks by deriving the demand for insurance and risky assets. Slide 75 Conclusion They will invest in risky assets if the expected return is higher than the return of the safe asset. They will prefer to be only partially insured if the insurance premium is not actuarially fair. We have developed a measure of risk aversion. People who are more risk averse will invest less in risky assets and take out more insurance than a person who is less risk averse. People s attitude towards risk may change as they have more wealth. Decreasing relative risk aversion yields the result that the wealthy invest proportionally more in risky assets than the less wealthy. Slide 76 Page 38
Lecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty
Lecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty 1. Introduction In this lecture we examine the theory of decisionmaking under uncertainty and its application to the demand for insurance. The undergraduate
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Theoretical Concepts/Techniques Expected Utility Theory Representing choice under uncertainty in statecontingent space Utility Functions and Attitudes towards Risk Risk Neutrality
More informationEconomics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics
Lecture 12: More Uncertainty Economics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics Lecture 12: More on Uncertainty Thursday, October 23, 2008 Last class we introduced choice under uncertainty. Today we will explore
More informationLecture 11 Uncertainty
Lecture 11 Uncertainty 1. Contingent Claims and the StatePreference Model 1) Contingent Commodities and Contingent Claims Using the simple twogood model we have developed throughout this course, think
More informationInsurance. Michael Peters. December 27, 2013
Insurance Michael Peters December 27, 2013 1 Introduction In this chapter, we study a very simple model of insurance using the ideas and concepts developed in the chapter on risk aversion. You may recall
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationEconomics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics
Lecture 11: Choice Under Uncertainty Economics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics Lecture 11: Choice Under Uncertainty Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Last class we wrapped up consumption over time. Today we
More informationChoice Under Uncertainty Insurance Diversification & Risk Sharing AIG. Uncertainty
Uncertainty Table of Contents 1 Choice Under Uncertainty Budget Constraint Preferences 2 Insurance Choice Framework Expected Utility Theory 3 Diversification & Risk Sharing 4 AIG States of Nature and Contingent
More information1 Uncertainty and Preferences
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationDemand and supply of health insurance. Folland et al Chapter 8
Demand and supply of health Folland et al Chapter 8 Chris Auld Economics 317 February 9, 2011 What is insurance? From an individual s perspective, insurance transfers wealth from good states of the world
More informationLecture 13: Risk Aversion and Expected Utility
Lecture 13: Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Uncertainty over monetary outcomes Let x denote a monetary outcome. C is a subset of the real line, i.e. [a, b]. A lottery L is a cumulative distribution
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 2 Precept September 30 Expected Utility and Risk Aversion Solutions
ECO 37 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 2 Precept September 30 Expected Utility and Risk Aversion Solutions First a recap from the question we considered last week (September 23), namely representing
More information.4 120 +.1 80 +.5 100 = 48 + 8 + 50 = 106.
Chapter 16. Risk and Uncertainty Part A 2009, Kwan Choi Expected Value X i = outcome i, p i = probability of X i EV = pix For instance, suppose a person has an idle fund, $100, for one month, and is considering
More informationChoice Under Uncertainty
Decision Making Under Uncertainty Choice Under Uncertainty Econ 422: Investment, Capital & Finance University of ashington Summer 2006 August 15, 2006 Course Chronology: 1. Intertemporal Choice: Exchange
More informationRisk and Insurance. Vani Borooah University of Ulster
Risk and Insurance Vani Borooah University of Ulster Gambles An action with more than one possible outcome, such that with each outcome there is an associated probability of that outcome occurring. If
More informationRegret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance *
Regret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance * Yoichiro Fujii, Osaka Sangyo University Mahito Okura, Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts Yusuke Osaki, Osaka Sangyo University + Abstract This papers
More informationLecture 10  Risk and Insurance
Lecture 10  Risk and Insurance 14.03 Spring 2003 1 Risk Aversion and Insurance: Introduction To have a passably usable model of choice, we need to be able to say something about how risk affects choice
More informationExpected Utility Over Money And Applications
Expected Utility Over Money And Applications Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 14, October 21 Outline 1 Expected Utility of Wealth 2 Betting and Insurance 3 Risk Aversion 4 Certainty Equivalent 5 Risk Premium
More informationBasic Utility Theory for Portfolio Selection
Basic Utility Theory for Portfolio Selection In economics and finance, the most popular approach to the problem of choice under uncertainty is the expected utility (EU) hypothesis. The reason for this
More informationWhy is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013)
Why is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013) Introduction The United States government is, to a rough approximation, an insurance company with an army. 1 That is
More informationUncertainty. BEE2017 Microeconomics
Uncertainty BEE2017 Microeconomics Uncertainty: The share prices of Amazon and the difficulty of investment decisions Contingent consumption 1. What consumption or wealth will you get in each possible
More informationExpected Utility and Insurance in a Two State Model
Economics A Section Notes GSI: David Albouy Expected Utility and Insurance in a Two State Model Expected Utility. The Basics Expected Utility (EU) theory is a technique developed by Von Neumann and Morgenstern
More informationAsset Pricing. Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion. June 20, 2006
Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion June 20, 2006 Measuring Risk Aversion Utility function Indifference Curves U(Y) tangent lines U(Y + h) U[0.5(Y + h) + 0.5(Y h)] 0.5U(Y + h) + 0.5U(Y h) U(Y
More informationK 1 < K 2 = P (K 1 ) P (K 2 ) (6) This holds for both American and European Options.
Slope and Convexity Restrictions and How to implement Arbitrage Opportunities 1 These notes will show how to implement arbitrage opportunities when either the slope or the convexity restriction is violated.
More informationFinancial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Financial Markets Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Trading and Price Formation This line of the literature analyzes the formation of prices in financial markets in a setting
More informationC2922 Economics Utility Functions
C2922 Economics Utility Functions T.C. Johnson October 30, 2007 1 Introduction Utility refers to the perceived value of a good and utility theory spans mathematics, economics and psychology. For example,
More informationManagerial Economics
Managerial Economics Unit 9: Risk Analysis Rudolf WinterEbmer Johannes Kepler University Linz Winter Term 2012 Managerial Economics: Unit 9  Risk Analysis 1 / 1 Objectives Explain how managers should
More informationMicroeconomics Tutoral 5: Choice under Uncertainty and Revealed Preferences October, 21th
Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Microeconomics: PSME  ngelo Secchi 1 Master I, cademic year 20152016 Microeconomics tutorials supervised by Elisa Baku 2 and ntoine Marsaudon 3. Microeconomics Tutoral
More informationProblem Set 9 Solutions
Problem Set 9 s 1. A monopoly insurance company provides accident insurance to two types of customers: low risk customers, for whom the probability of an accident is 0.25, and high risk customers, for
More informationAnalyzing the Demand for Deductible Insurance
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18:3 3 1999 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Analyzing the emand for eductible Insurance JACK MEYER epartment of Economics, Michigan State
More informationNotes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov).
Notes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov). These payments are called premiums. Insurer promises to make a
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 21 Insurance, Portfolio Choice  Questions
ECO 37 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 2 Insurance, Portfolio Choice  Questions Important Note: To get the best value out of this precept, come with your calculator or
More informationConsumer Theory. The consumer s problem
Consumer Theory The consumer s problem 1 The Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) We define the MRS(x,y) as the absolute value of the slope of the line tangent to the indifference curve at point point (x,y).
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory IIIii. Payoffs: Probability and Expected Utility
Introduction to Game Theory IIIii Payoffs: Probability and Expected Utility Lecture Summary 1. Introduction 2. Probability Theory 3. Expected Values and Expected Utility. 1. Introduction We continue further
More informationChapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model
Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal
More informationHealth Economics. University of Linz & Demand and supply of health insurance. Gerald J. Pruckner. Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010
Health Economics Demand and supply of health insurance University of Linz & Gerald J. Pruckner Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010 Gerald J. Pruckner Health insurance 1 / 25 Introduction Insurance plays a
More informationDecision Making under Uncertainty
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
More informationMidterm Exam:Answer Sheet
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a riskfree and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
More informationMoral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 PrincipalAgent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More informationAn Introduction to Utility Theory
An Introduction to Utility Theory John Norstad jnorstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org March 29, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract A gentle but reasonably rigorous introduction to utility
More informationName. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions.
Name Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions. Question 1. A firm has a production function F (x 1, x 2 ) = ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. It is a price
More informationAdverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton
Preliminary and Incomplete Please do not Quote Adverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton Washington University, Department of Economics Date: 4/24/01 Abstract Several
More informationChapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions
Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions We saw in the text that utility functions and indifference curves are different ways to represent a consumer s preferences. Calculus can
More informationCHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS
CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS PROBLEM SETS 1. (e). (b) A higher borrowing is a consequence of the risk of the borrowers default. In perfect markets with no additional
More informationFinance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model These notes consider the singleperiod model in Kyle (1985) Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica 15,
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 4, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Decisions, utility maximization Strategic form games Best responses
More informationIntermediate Micro. Expected Utility
Intermediate Micro Expected Utility Workhorse model of intermediate micro Utility maximization problem Consumers Max U(x,y) subject to the budget constraint, I=P x x + P y y Health Economics Spring 2015
More informationGeneral Equilibrium Theory: Examples
General Equilibrium Theory: Examples 3 examples of GE: pure exchange (Edgeworth box) 1 producer  1 consumer several producers and an example illustrating the limits of the partial equilibrium approach
More informationU = x 1 2. 1 x 1 4. 2 x 1 4. What are the equilibrium relative prices of the three goods? traders has members who are best off?
Chapter 7 General Equilibrium Exercise 7. Suppose there are 00 traders in a market all of whom behave as price takers. Suppose there are three goods and the traders own initially the following quantities:
More informationSolution: The optimal position for an investor with a coefficient of risk aversion A = 5 in the risky asset is y*:
Problem 1. Consider a risky asset. Suppose the expected rate of return on the risky asset is 15%, the standard deviation of the asset return is 22%, and the riskfree rate is 6%. What is your optimal position
More informationIntroduction. Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection. Problem of individual insurance. Health Economics Bill Evans
Introduction Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection Health Economics Bill Evans Intermediate micro build models of individual, firm and market behavior Most models assume actors fully informed about
More informationFund Manager s Portfolio Choice
Fund Manager s Portfolio Choice Zhiqing Zhang Advised by: Gu Wang September 5, 2014 Abstract Fund manager is allowed to invest the fund s assets and his personal wealth in two separate risky assets, modeled
More informationReview for Exam 2. Instructions: Please read carefully
Review for Exam 2 Instructions: Please read carefully The exam will have 25 multiple choice questions and 5 work problems You are not responsible for any topics that are not covered in the lecture note
More informationEconomics of Insurance
Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow
More informationEconomic Feasibility Studies
Economic Feasibility Studies ١ Introduction Every long term decision the firm makes is a capital budgeting decision whenever it changes the company s cash flows. The difficulty with making these decisions
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A)
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) The economic agent (PR 3.13.4) Standard economics vs. behavioral economics Lectures 12 Aug. 15, 2009 Prologue
More information3 Introduction to Assessing Risk
3 Introduction to Assessing Risk Important Question. How do we assess the risk an investor faces when choosing among assets? In this discussion we examine how an investor would assess the risk associated
More informationCONSUMER PREFERENCES THE THEORY OF THE CONSUMER
CONSUMER PREFERENCES The underlying foundation of demand, therefore, is a model of how consumers behave. The individual consumer has a set of preferences and values whose determination are outside the
More informationLecture 2 Dynamic Equilibrium Models : Finite Periods
Lecture 2 Dynamic Equilibrium Models : Finite Periods 1. Introduction In macroeconomics, we study the behavior of economywide aggregates e.g. GDP, savings, investment, employment and so on  and their
More informationChapter 14 Risk Analysis
Chapter 14 Risk Analysis 1 Frequency definition of probability Given a situation in which a number of possible outcomes might occur, the probability of an outcome is the proportion of times that it occurs
More informationWHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES. A D Wilkie, United Kingdom. Summary and Conclusions
WHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES A D Wilkie, United Kingdom Summary and Conclusions The question of whether a risk averse investor might be the more willing to hold shares rather
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Ordinal preference theory Harald Wiese University of Leipzig Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 1 / 68 Part A. Basic decision and preference theory 1 Decisions
More informationEcon 132 C. Health Insurance: U.S., Risk Pooling, Risk Aversion, Moral Hazard, Rand Study 7
Econ 132 C. Health Insurance: U.S., Risk Pooling, Risk Aversion, Moral Hazard, Rand Study 7 C2. Health Insurance: Risk Pooling Health insurance works by pooling individuals together to reduce the variability
More informationREVIEW OF MICROECONOMICS
ECO 352 Spring 2010 Precepts Weeks 1, 2 Feb. 1, 8 REVIEW OF MICROECONOMICS Concepts to be reviewed Budget constraint: graphical and algebraic representation Preferences, indifference curves. Utility function
More informationReview of Utility Theory, Expected Utility
Review of Utility Theory, Expected Utility Utility theory is the foundation of neoclassical economic demand theory. According to this theory, consumption of goods and services provides satisfaction, or
More informationFinancial Services [Applications]
Financial Services [Applications] Tomáš Sedliačik Institute o Finance University o Vienna tomas.sedliacik@univie.ac.at 1 Organization Overall there will be 14 units (12 regular units + 2 exams) Course
More informationThe MarketClearing Model
Chapter 5 The MarketClearing Model Most of the models that we use in this book build on two common assumptions. First, we assume that there exist markets for all goods present in the economy, and that
More information1. Briefly explain what an indifference curve is and how it can be graphically derived.
Chapter 2: Consumer Choice Short Answer Questions 1. Briefly explain what an indifference curve is and how it can be graphically derived. Answer: An indifference curve shows the set of consumption bundles
More informationCost Minimization and the Cost Function
Cost Minimization and the Cost Function Juan Manuel Puerta October 5, 2009 So far we focused on profit maximization, we could look at a different problem, that is the cost minimization problem. This is
More informationFirst Welfare Theorem
First Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 17, November 2 Outline 1 First Welfare Theorem 2 Preliminaries to Second Welfare Theorem Last Class Definitions A feasible allocation (x, y) is Pareto
More information1 Portfolio mean and variance
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman Portfolio mean and variance Here we study the performance of a oneperiod investment X 0 > 0 (dollars) shared among several different assets. Our criterion for measuring
More informationApplied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004
Applied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004 Outline 1 Uncertainty and asset prices 2 Informational efficiency  rational expectations, random walks 3 Asymmetric information  lemons,
More informationRisk and Uncertainty. Vani K Borooah University of Ulster
Risk and Uncertainty Vani K Borooah University of Ulster Basic Concepts Gamble: An action with more than one possible outcome, such that with each outcome there is an associated probability of that outcome
More informationEquilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information
Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information By: Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz Presented by Benjamin S. Barber IV, Xiaoshu Bei, Zhi Chen, Shaiobi
More informationBargaining Solutions in a Social Network
Bargaining Solutions in a Social Network Tanmoy Chakraborty and Michael Kearns Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania Abstract. We study the concept of bargaining solutions,
More informationLecture Note 14: Uncertainty, Expected Utility Theory and the Market for Risk
Lecture Note 14: Uncertainty, Expected Utility Theory and the Market for Risk David Autor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 14.03/14.003, Microeconomic Theory and Public Policy, Fall 2010 1 Risk Aversion
More informationPractice Set #4 and Solutions.
FIN469 Investments Analysis Professor Michel A. Robe Practice Set #4 and Solutions. What to do with this practice set? To help students prepare for the assignment and the exams, practice sets with solutions
More informationNoBetting Pareto Dominance
NoBetting Pareto Dominance Itzhak Gilboa, Larry Samuelson and David Schmeidler HEC Paris/Tel Aviv Yale Interdisciplinary Center Herzlyia/Tel Aviv/Ohio State May, 2014 I. Introduction I.1 Trade Suppose
More informationChapter 2 An Introduction to Forwards and Options
Chapter 2 An Introduction to Forwards and Options Question 2.1. The payoff diagram of the stock is just a graph of the stock price as a function of the stock price: In order to obtain the profit diagram
More informationSecond degree price discrimination
Bergals School of Economics Fall 1997/8 Tel Aviv University Second degree price discrimination Yossi Spiegel 1. Introduction Second degree price discrimination refers to cases where a firm does not have
More informationEconomics 2020a / HBS 4010 / HKS API111 FALL 2010 Solutions to Practice Problems for Lectures 1 to 4
Economics 00a / HBS 4010 / HKS API111 FALL 010 Solutions to Practice Problems for Lectures 1 to 4 1.1. Quantity Discounts and the Budget Constraint (a) The only distinction between the budget line with
More informationEconomics 206 Problem Set 1 Winter 2007 Vincent Crawford
Economics 206 Problem Set 1 Winter 2007 Vincent Crawford This problem set, which is optional, covers the material in the first half of the course, roughly in the order in which topics are discussed in
More information6 EXTENDING ALGEBRA. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 The cubic equation. Objectives
6 EXTENDING ALGEBRA Chapter 6 Extending Algebra Objectives After studying this chapter you should understand techniques whereby equations of cubic degree and higher can be solved; be able to factorise
More information3 More on Accumulation and Discount Functions
3 More on Accumulation and Discount Functions 3.1 Introduction In previous section, we used 1.03) # of years as the accumulation factor. This section looks at other accumulation factors, including various
More informationLecture 1: Asset Allocation
Lecture 1: Asset Allocation Investments FIN460Papanikolaou Asset Allocation I 1/ 62 Overview 1. Introduction 2. Investor s Risk Tolerance 3. Allocating Capital Between a Risky and riskless asset 4. Allocating
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More informationCritical points of once continuously differentiable functions are important because they are the only points that can be local maxima or minima.
Lecture 0: Convexity and Optimization We say that if f is a once continuously differentiable function on an interval I, and x is a point in the interior of I that x is a critical point of f if f (x) =
More informationAn Overview of Asset Pricing Models
An Overview of Asset Pricing Models Andreas Krause University of Bath School of Management Phone: +441225323771 Fax: +441225323902 EMail: a.krause@bath.ac.uk Preliminary Version. Crossreferences
More informationIndifference Curves and the Marginal Rate of Substitution
Introduction Introduction to Microeconomics Indifference Curves and the Marginal Rate of Substitution In microeconomics we study the decisions and allocative outcomes of firms, consumers, households and
More informationOnline Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents
Online Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents William H. Sandholm January 6, 22 O.. Imitative protocols, mean dynamics, and equilibrium selection In this section, we consider
More informationEconomics 165 Winter 2002 Problem Set #2
Economics 165 Winter 2002 Problem Set #2 Problem 1: Consider the monopolistic competition model. Say we are looking at sailboat producers. Each producer has fixed costs of 10 million and marginal costs
More informationLecture 1 (Review of High School Math: Functions and Models) Introduction: Numbers and their properties
Lecture 1 (Review of High School Math: Functions and Models) Introduction: Numbers and their properties Addition: (1) (Associative law) If a, b, and c are any numbers, then ( ) ( ) (2) (Existence of an
More informationExplaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 22: 121 134 (1997) c 1997 The Geneva Association Explaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection VIRGINIA R. YOUNG AND MARK J. BROWNE School
More informationLecture 3: Growth with Overlapping Generations (Acemoglu 2009, Chapter 9, adapted from Zilibotti)
Lecture 3: Growth with Overlapping Generations (Acemoglu 2009, Chapter 9, adapted from Zilibotti) Kjetil Storesletten September 10, 2013 Kjetil Storesletten () Lecture 3 September 10, 2013 1 / 44 Growth
More informationDecision making in the presence of uncertainty II
CS 274 Knowledge representation Lecture 23 Decision making in the presence of uncertainty II Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Informationgathering actions Many actions and their
More informationComputational Finance Options
1 Options 1 1 Options Computational Finance Options An option gives the holder of the option the right, but not the obligation to do something. Conversely, if you sell an option, you may be obliged to
More informationNotes on Uncertainty and Expected Utility
Notes on Uncertainty and Expected Utility Ted Bergstrom, UCSB Economics 210A December 10, 2014 1 Introduction Expected utility theory has a remarkably long history, predating Adam Smith by a generation
More informationOn Prevention and Control of an Uncertain Biological Invasion H
On Prevention and Control of an Uncertain Biological Invasion H by Lars J. Olson Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA and Santanu Roy Department
More information