CU Faculty/Staff Buff OneCard Tracking Survey WINTER RESPONDENTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CU Faculty/Staff Buff OneCard Tracking Survey WINTER RESPONDENTS"

Transcription

1 CU Faculty/Staff Buff OneCard Tracking Survey WINTER RESPONDENTS SURVEY FACTS In March of 18, the Regional Transportation District (RTD) conducted its first survey among Colorado University (CU) employees who are eligible for a Buff OneCard. The Buff OneCard allows faculty and staff to ride all regular RTD buses and light rail free of charge. Follow-up surveys were conducted in October 18, May 1, May 2000, and May 2001 in order to provide RTD and CU with tracking information. The present report displays results from a fifth tracking survey done in the winter of The objective of this fifth tracking survey was to determine longer-term trends in Buff OneCard participation and usage among eligible employees and to compare these findings to previous data. 503 employees responded to this fifth survey, including 35 by telephone and 108 by interoffice mail. The questionnaire was modified from previous years versions by CU, and the telephone fieldwork was conducted by Aspen Media & Market Research. The telephone surveys were conducted during November and December There were 365 respondents from the Main Campus and 138 respondents from the East Campus. A random selection procedure was used in proportion to the number of employees by type of occupation and location of employment (Main vs. East Campus). The final data was weighted for a proportionate representation of all groups in the final sample of respondents (see Appendix A). The statistical range of accuracy in 1 out of 20 cases for the present survey is ±4.4 percentage points. Sample tolerances for subgroups are larger. Due to rounding, not all totals equal 100 percent; the number of respondents (n) is recorded throughout the report. Page i

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background... Page 1 Key Findings... Page 2 Survey Results... Page 4 Appendix A: Weighting Factors Appendix B: Survey Questionnaire Page ii

3 BACKGROUND In March of 18, the Regional Transportation District (RTD) conducted a survey among faculty and staff at Colorado University (CU) in Boulder. The purpose of this survey was to determine participation and usage rates for the newly offered Buff OneCard for CU faculty and staff. The Buff OneCard allows eligible CU employees to ride all regular RTD buses and light rail free of charge. Follow-up surveys were conducted in October 18, May 1, May 2000, and May 2001 in order to provide RTD and CU with tracking information about the same issue. The present report depicts results from a fifth tracking survey done in the winter of It illustrates longerterm trends in Buff OneCard participation and usage among eligible employees and compares these findings to the previous data. The classification of respondents to this survey is as follows: Type of Occupation of Respondents Classified Staff % Professional Exempt 47.3% Unclassified Administration 3 0.6% Faculty % Research Personnel % Total 503 Location of Respondents East Campus % Main Campus % Page 1

4 KEY FINDINGS Ninety-four percent of total respondents had picked up their Buff OneCard at survey time in 2002, which is an increase of four percentage points from 2001, and a statistically significant increase from 80% in March 18. Transit Use and Other Commute Choices Twenty-one percent of all respondents traveled to work by bus on the day of the survey. This is an increase from 17% in The percentage of staff employees who rode the bus increased by six percentage points from 2001 to 2002, and the percentage of faculty bus riders decreased by three points. Buff OneCard holders in 2002 traveled to work by bus an average of 1. days per week. This signifies the first increase since 1, up from 1.01 days in It also remains a strong increase from 0.54 days prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard. In 2002, 33% of Buff OneCard holders used the bus at least one day per week to commute to work. This is an increase of two percentage points from For the equivalent base of respondents, 17% used the bus at least once a week prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard. Thirty-two percent of all respondents ride the bus to work at least one day during a typical week. This number increased by four percentage points from last year and has increased from 24% in March 18. The percentage of faculty who use the bus at least one day per week increased from 23% last year to 2% this year, and the percentage of staff riders also increased, from 30% last year to 36% this year. Sixty-four percent of respondents said they drive to work alone at least one day a week, unchanged from March 18. The average number of days respondents commute by singleoccupancy vehicle was 2.6, slightly down from 2.8 in In 2002, 38% of respondents (increase of seven percentage points from last year) said they take the bus or Light Rail at least once a week for trips other than commuting to work, such as for pleasure or personal business. Overall, there is a increase from 28% in March 18. Parking Impact Prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard for CU employees, 64% of respondents parked on campus at least one day during an average week. For 2002, this number was down to 56%, a decrease of two percentage points from the previous year. Forty-six percent of respondents parked on campus for five days or more before they had a Buff OneCard available to them. This number had decreased to 38% this year, unchanged from The mean number of days respondents parked on campus during a typical week was 2.8 prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard, 2.5 in 2001 and 2.4 this year. Page 2

5 Overall, the average number of days per month respondents parked on campus had decreased from before the Buff OneCard program to in May 1. By 2002, this figure had increased slightly to 10 days. Since before the start of the Buff OneCard program, the number of days staff respondents park on campus decreased from 11 to, and for faculty, it decreased from 14 to 11. Thirty-five percent of respondents in 2002 said they never park on campus during a typical month, compared to 34% last year and 27% before the start of the Buff OneCard program. Fifty-nine percent of all respondents had a CU parking permit before the Buff OneCard was available to them. By this year, this percentage showed a significant decrease to 51%. The percentage of faculty respondents with a CU parking permit also decreased significantly from prior to the Buff OneCard program to 2002, from 71% to 61%. For staff respondents, it decreased significantly from 56% prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard to 47% in Twenty percent of respondents who commute to work by bus at least once during a typical week said they use a park-n-ride when they ride the bus to work. Quality of Service Thirty-three percent of total respondents rated RTD s service as excellent, a decrease of one percentage point from last year. Excellent ratings are up from 26% in October 18. Another 44% rated RTD service as good (up from 41% last year). Three percent of all respondents rated service as poor or unacceptable. Among current RTD commuters, 40% rated RTD service as excellent and 50% rated it as good. One percent of current riders gave a poor or unacceptable rating. Page 3

6 SURVEY RESULTS 1) During a typical week, how many days do you commute to work at CU Boulder? Commute to work: Number of days per week 0% 80% 70% % 50% 40% 30% % March 18 October days per week 5 days per week 6-7 days per week n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 In 2002, as was the case in previous surveys, the majority of respondents commuted to work five days a week (81%). The average number of days respondents commuted to work in a week was 4.. Commuting patterns have remained almost constant from 18 to Page 4

7 2) Approximately, how many miles do you travel one-way on your commute to work at the CU Boulder campus? Commute to work: Mean number of miles Mean number of miles March 18 October Total CU Parking Permit No CU Parking Permit n = 476 n = 500 n = 488 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 On average, respondents traveled 11.1 miles one-way on their commute to work, up from.8 miles a year ago. As in previous surveys, the commute was longer for respondents with a CU parking permit, with 11.8 miles on average, than for respondents without a parking permit, with 10.5 miles. Commuting distances were almost identical for respondents who use RTD for their commute (10.8 miles) and for respondents who use other means of transportation (11.3 miles). Finally, with 7. miles, faculty respondents tended to have a shorter average commute than all other employee groups. Page 5

8 3) How did you get to work today? 4) If you rode a bus today, what type of bus did you ride? Percent of respondents who traveled to work by bus* on survey day 25% 15% 5% 0% March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 478 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound, and Stampede transit riders decreased by three points Twenty-one percent of all respondents traveled to work by bus on the day of the survey. Four percent of these employees used a park-n-ride. This is an increase from 17% in Twenty-four percent of staff employees traveled to work by bus on survey day, compared to % of faculty. This means that the percentage of staff employees who rode the bus increased by six percentage points from 2001 to 2002, while the percentage of faculty Respondents whose offices are located on the Main Campus (23%) were more likely to have ridden the bus on the day of the survey than were respondents from the East Campus (15%). Sixty percent of respondents who took public transportation to commute to work on the day of the survey had ridden a regular RTD bus, followed by 22% who rode the Skip and 4% each who rode the Hop or the Bound. Type of bus ridden to work Other 4% Stampede 3% Jump 3% Bound 4% Hop 4% Skip 22% Regular RTD bus 60% n = 103 Base: Respondents who rode a bus to work on the day of the survey Page 6

9 5) During a typical week, how many days do you commute to work by either driving to work alone, carpooling or vanpooling, riding a bus, catching a bus at a park-n-ride, riding a bicycle or walking? Mean number of days travel to work by bus* per week Among Buff OneCard holders at time of survey Mean number of days/week Prior to Buff OneCard March 18 October n=386 n=386 n=432 n=421 n=440 n=457 n=473 * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound, and Stampede Base: Respondents who had a Buff OneCard at time of survey Buff OneCard holders in 2002 traveled to work by bus an average of 1. days per week (this includes employees who parked at a park-n-ride and rode the bus from there). This signifies the first increase since 1, up from 1.01 days in It also remains a strong increase from 0.54 days prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard. For respondents who had a Buff OneCard and who used the bus at least one day per week to travel to work, the average number of days for bus travel was 3.4. This compares to 3.3 days for May This base of respondents traveled by bus an average of 3.2 days per week prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard. Bus commuters who work on the Main Campus ride the bus an average of 3.4 days a week, as do bus riders heading to the East Campus. Page 7

10 Percent bus* commuters** Among Buff OneCard holders at time of survey 35% 30% % 15% 17 5% 0% Prior to Buff OneCard March 18 October n=386 n=386 n=432 n=421 n=440 n=457 n=473 * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound, and Stampede **Respondents who ride the bus to work at least one day a week Base: Respondents who have a Buff OneCard at time of survey In 2002, 33% of Buff OneCard holders used the bus at least one day per week to commute to work. This is an increase of two percentage points from 2001, after three years of constant ridership levels. For the equivalent base of respondents, 17% used the bus at least once a week prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard. Page 8

11 Estimated overall numbers of weekly one-way bus* trips to or from work Extrapolated to all Buff OneCard holders 16,000 Number of one-way bus trips 14,000 13,750,000 10,000 8,000 8,826,104 11,650 11,782 11,474 6,000 4,000 4,22 2,000 0 Prior to Buff OneCard March 18 October * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound and Stampede Base: Respondents who have a Buff OneCard The number of one-way bus trips to and from work by CU Buff OneCard holders increased from approximately 4,22 prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard to 8,826 in March 18 and is now at 13,750. The increase is due to a number of factors: rising percentages of Buff OneCard holders and of bus riders among Buff OneCard holders, and a growing number of CU faculty and staff eligible for the Buff OneCard. The graph displayed above is based on the assumptions listed in the table below. Prior to Buff OneCard March 18 October Number of eligible faculty/staff: 5,643 5,643 5,56 6,076 6,436 6,267 6,530 Percentage of Buff OneCard holders: 80.4%** 80.4% 86.2% 86.1% 87.3% 0.4% 4.1% Number of Buff OneCard holders: 4,537 4,537 4,824 5,231 5,61 5,665 6,145 Percentage of bus commuters among Buff OneCard holders: 16.8% 28.2% 27.6% 31.1% 31.1% 30.5% 33.2% Number of bus commuters among Buff OneCard holders: 762 1,27 1,331 1,627 1,748 1,728 2,040 Mean number of days/week bus commuters with Buff OneCards travel to work by bus: Total number of days/week bus commuters with Buff OneCards travel to work by bus: 2,461 4,413 4,552 5,825 5,81 5,737 6,875 Total number of one-way bus trips/week (assumes 2 one-way trips/day): 4,22 8,826,104 11,650 11,782 11,474 13,750 **Percentage who had picked up their Buff OneCard at survey time in March Page

12 Respondents who commute to work by bus at least one day during a typical week* 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% % March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 Base: Total respondents * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound and Stampede Thirty-two percent of all respondents ride the bus to work at least one day during a typical week. This number increased by four percentage points from last year and has increased from 24% in March 18. The percentage of faculty who use the bus at least one day per week increased, after a drop in 2001, from 23% last year to 2% this year, while the percentage of staff riders continued its increase, from 26% in 2001 to 30% last year to 36% this year. As reported above, 33% of respondents who had a Buff OneCard at survey time stated that they ride the bus to work at least once during a typical week. As was true on the day the survey was taken, respondents from the Main Campus (35%) were more likely to take the bus to work in a typical week that were respondents from the East Campus (23%). Page 10

13 8) What bus route or routes do you ride most often for commuting to work? 40% Commute to work by bus: Specific Boulder Local routes used 35% 30% 25% Other Boulder Local Skip Bound Hop 15% 5% Jump Stampede Leap 0% March 18 October Base: Respondents who commute to work by riding RTD at least 1 day during a typical week Multiple responses possible Of Boulder Local routes ridden for the work commute to campus, other routes continue to be used most frequently. The Skip remains the single most popular route with 27% of respondents riding it on their way to campus. The Bound and the Hop were mentioned by eight percent of CU commuters each, but both routes had to give up ridership share to the Jump and the new Stampede route, each of which were mentioned by 6% of respondents. Page 11

14 Respondents who drive to work alone at least one day during a typical week 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 0% March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 Base: Total respondents Car ridership continues to remain steady since the introduction of the Buff OneCard. Sixty-four percent of respondents said they drive to work alone at least one day a week, down from 67% last year. The average number of days respondents commute by singleoccupancy vehicle was 2.6, slightly down from 2.8 in RTD riders use their cars 0.7 days a week to commute to campus. After an increase in singleoccupancy car ridership for faculty respondents last year, there was a decrease from 71% to 64% this year. Reasons for driving to work alone Stop for errands More convenient 13 Faster Respondents who drive alone at least once a week were asked their most common reason for doing so. Seventeen percent said they stop for errands on their way to or from work, followed by 13% each who said that driving alone is either faster or more convenient. Another % need a car to pick up or drop off children as part of their commute. Need car to drop off/pick up children Live too far from public transportation Work unusual hours/schedule conflicts No alternative commuting options available Don't know about alternative commuting options Need car for job Other % 2% 4% 6% 8% % 14% 16% 18% n=320 Base: Respondents who drove to work alone on the day of the survey 13 Page

15 Single occupancy car drivers who said they lived too far from public transportation to use it were asked how far they believed the nearest transit stop was from their residence. On average, respondents thought the nearest stop was 3.4 miles away. A combined 52% believed the nearest stop was between less than one mile and three miles away. Seven percent did not know where their nearest bus stop was located. Respondents who stop for errands on their way to or from work do so for an average of 2.6 days a week. Nine percent stop for errands five days a week. Respondents who thought driving alone was their fastest commute option were asked how long they estimated their commute to be for a variety of modes. On average, they estimated their single occupancy vehicle commute to be 23 minutes, a carpool commute to be 35 minutes, a bus commute to be 50 minutes, and a bicycle commute to be 57 minutes. Fifteen percent of respondents who said they did not know about alternative commuting options to driving alone had contacted the University or RTD about transportation choices. Respondents who said that the cost of driving alone and parking was not significant enough to cause them to look at alternative commute options estimated they spend an average of $65 a month for fuel and parking. Respondents who said they need the flexibility of a car because of the possibility of bad weather drive alone because of the weather an average of 11 days a year. Respondents who like to have their car at work in case of an emergency with their children estimated that they had an average of eight emergencies with their child or children during the last year. Respondents who pick up and/or drop off children before or after work do so for an average of four days a week. The use of carpools and vanpools has increased slightly from the beginning of the Buff OneCard program. This year, 16% of respondents said they share a ride to work at least once a week, up from % in The average number of days respondents carpool or vanpool was 0.5, unchanged from March 18. Respondents who carpool/vanpool to work at least one day during a typical week 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 0% March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 Base: Total respondents Page 13

16 Respondents who ride a bike to work at least one day during a typical week 80% 70% 60% In March 18, respondents rode bicycles to work 0.3 days per week, on average, compared to 0.4 days this year. 50% 40% 30% % March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 Base: Total respondents faculty respondents lower average commuting distance. Bicycle ridership to and from work overall has shown a slight upward trend, increasing from in 18 to 13% in Faculty (17%) remain more likely than staff (6%) to ride their bicycles to work at least once a week, presumably reflecting Seven percent of respondents said they walk to work at least one day a week, a slight decrease from 11% in March 18. Nine percent of faculty respondents reported walking to work, compared to 5% of staff. The average number of days per week respondents walk to work is 0.3, down from 0.4 in March 18. Respondents who walk to work at least one day during a typical week 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 0% March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 480 n = 501 n = 48 n = 504 n = 506 n = 503 Base: Total respondents Page 14

17 ) Do you ever use a RTD park-n-ride facility when you ride the bus to work? a) What is the name of the park-n-ride facility you use most often? Use a park-n-ride when riding the bus to work Faculty: Yes Yes No 0% Base: Faculty respondents who commute to work by bus at least one day a week n=75 No 80% Base: Respondents who commute to work by bus at least one day a week n=135 Staff: Yes 33% No 67% Base: Staff respondents who commute to work by bus at least one day a week n=60 Twenty percent of respondents who commute to work by bus at least once during a typical week said they use a park-n-ride when they ride the bus to work. Staff respondents (33%) were more likely than faculty () to make use of a park-n-ride. Moreover, respondents who worked on the East Campus (33%) had a higher percentage of park-n-ride users than did those working on the Main Campus (17%). Page 15

18 10) Do you have a Buff OneCard issued by the University that allows you to ride RTD for free? March 18 No Have a Buff OneCard No 24% No 15% Base: Total n=480 Fall 2002 No 6% Yes 80% Yes 76% Base: CU Parking Permit n=251 No 7% No 5% Yes 85% Base: No CU Parking Permit n=22 Base: Total n=503 Yes 4% Base: CU Parking Permit n=256 Yes 3% Yes 5% Base: No CU Parking Permit n=247 Ninety-four percent of total respondents had picked up their Buff OneCard at survey time in 2002, which is an increase of four percentage points from 2001, and a statistically significant increase from 80% in March 18. For the first time since March 18, respondents who had a CU parking permit were equally likely to have picked up their Buff OneCard as were respondents without a CU parking permit: 3% of CU parking permit holders had a Buff OneCard, compared to 5% of respondents without a parking permit. In March and October 18, staff respondents had been more likely than faculty to pick up their Buff OneCard. In March, 82% of staff respondents had a Buff OneCard, compared to 73% of faculty, while in October, 88% of staff respondents reported having a Buff OneCard, compared to 7% of faculty. Now participation is almost equal for both groups, with 5% of staff and 2% of faculty in possession of Buff OneCards. Page 16

19 11) During a typical week, how many trips do you make off-campus for University related business? ) Which one of the following modes of travel do you use most often for off-campus trips for University business? 70% 60% 50% Mode of travel for off-campus trips % 30% 28 0% March 18 October Walk Bike Ride in someone else's car Use a university vehicle Bus* Drive in own car n = 15 n = 228 n = 183 n = 201 n = 206 n = 225 * Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound and Stampede Base: Respondents who make at least one off-campus trip per week During a typical week, 2002 respondents made an average of 1.0 off-campus trips for University related business. This was slightly down from 1.2 trips in March 18. Fifty-three percent of respondents who took at least one off-campus trip per week most often drove their own car for these trips, a decrease of twelve percentage points from March 18. Twenty-eight percent rode the bus, which was an increase of sixteen percentage points over March 18. The bus routes used most often were the Stampede (%) and the Skip (7%). The number of respondents who used a University vehicle decreased from 13% in March to % in 200. Regular RTD commuters (22%) were less likely than respondents who typically do not ride RTD to work (63%) to drive their own car for off-campus trips. They were, in turn, more likely to take the bus for off-campus travel (52% versus, respectively). Page 17

20 13) During a typical week, how many one-way trips do you make on an RTD bus or Light Rail that are not for commuting to work but are for pleasure or personal business? Non-commute riders* on RTD** 45% 40% % 30% 25% % 5% 0% March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 478 n = 48 n = 486 n = 502 n = 500 n = 503 *Respondents who ride the bus for pleasure or personal business at least one day a week **Note: Includes RTD bus, Skip, Hop, Jump, Leap, Bound and Stampede In 2002, 38% of respondents (increase of seven percentage point from last year) said they take the bus or Light Rail at least once a week for trips other than commuting to work, such as for pleasure or personal business. Overall, there is a increase from 28% in March 18. Noncommute ridership increased even stronger for staff respondents, from 27% in March 18 to 3% in Faculty non-commute ridership made a big jump, from 25% in 2001 to 37% in Since March 18, the increase for faculty was seven percentage points. Twenty-seven percent of respondents who never use the bus to commute to campus report taking public transportation at least once a week for non-commute trips, compared to 62% of bus commuters. Moreover, 11% of respondents who do not have a Buff OneCard still ride the bus for purposes other than their commute. Page 18

21 14) Would you rate your overall satisfaction with RTD service as excellent, good, fair, poor or unacceptable? Excellent (5) Good (4) Fair (3) Poor (2) Unacceptable (1) Don't know Overall satisfaction with RTD (1) % 30% 40% 50% Mean rating Total: 4.2 Note: Question not asked in 3/8 survey 2002, n= , n= , n=501 1, n=487 October 18, n=47 of all respondents rated service as poor or unacceptable. On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 meaning unacceptable and 5 meaning excellent, the mean rating for RTD service from all respondents was 4.2, unchanged from last year. Thirty-three percent of total respondents rated RTD s service as excellent, a decrease of one percentage point from last year. Excellent ratings are still up from 26% in October 18. Another 44% rated RTD service as good (up from 41% last year). Three percent Among current RTD commuters, 40% rated RTD service as excellent and 50% rated it as good. One percent of current riders gave a poor or unacceptable rating. Staff respondents were slightly more likely to rate RTD s service as excellent than were faculty respondents (37% versus 30%, respectively). Three percent of faculty and staff each gave a poor or unacceptable rating. Excellent (5) Good (4) Fair (3) Poor (2) Overall satisfaction with RTD (2) Total, n=503 Staff, n=204 Faculty, n=2 Unacceptable (1) Don't know % 30% 40% 50% Page 1

22 15) What one improvement to service, if any, would encourage you to ride RTD more often? 16) What, if anything, would encourage you to carpool, vanpool, bicycle, or walk to campus or to a park-n-ride more often? Improvements to service that would cause CU faculty and staff to ride RTD more often More frequent buses Closer bus stop/route to home/work Better/more convenient bus routes Better/more convenient schedules Direct route/fewer transfers from home Being on time Light Rail along US 36 More p-n-r locations Easier connections Better bus shelters More bus stops Other Nothing Don't know CU faculty and staff respondents would be encouraged to more often use other alternative modes of transportation, such as carpooling, if they knew other people who lived nearby (7%) or had a flexible schedule (4%). Five percent said they already used alternate modes as much as possible, and 13% felt that nothing would encourage them to carpool, vanpool, bike or walk more % 5% 15% 25% 30% n= What would encourage CU faculty and staff to carpool, vanpool, bicycle or walk to campus or a p-n-r more often Other people who live nearby Already do as much as possible Flexible schedule Good weather Better bus routes Living closer to work Better bus schedule If children were older If knew other people who wanted to carpool Bike lanes/bike paths Some sort of incentive Organized system to find people to carpool with Other Nothing Don't know Nine percent of respondents stated that no specific improvements to RTD service would cause them to ride the bus more often. The remaining respondents listed a variety of improvement suggestions, including more frequent buses (14%), closer bus stop/route to home/work (%), better/more convenient bus routes (7%), and better/more convenient time schedules (7%) % 30% 40% 50% n= Page 20

23 17) If CU Boulder developed new bicycle services and facilities on campus, which of the following might you be inclined to use? Bicycle services and facilities CU faculty and staff are most likely to use Secure bike storage room 15 Individual secure, fully enclosed bike lockers Covered bike racks One speed commuter bikes available for rent 8 Bike tune-up and repair service 5 Class on bike maintenance 4 Service station w/ tools and compressed air 2 Don't know 48 0% 5% 15% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% n=503 Fifteen percent of CU faculty and staff would use a secure bike storage room that would allow you to use your own bike on campus, check it safely over night, and commute between campus and home by transit, car or carpool. Ten percent of those interested in the bike storage room would be willing to pay $20 $25 a month for it, 25% $15 less than $20, 33% $10 less than $15, and 58% $5 less than $10. Nine percent each said they would be most likely to use individual, fully enclosed bike lockers or covered bike racks. Of those interested in the bike lockers, 11% would be willing to pay $20 - $25 a month, 22% $15 less than $20 a month, 48% $10 to less than $15 a month, and 63% $5 to less than $10 a month. Of those interested in covered bike racks, 2% would be willing to park their bike four blocks from their final campus destination, 2% three blocks, 46% two blocks, 61% one block, and 76% half a block. Eight percent of the respondents said they would be most likely to rent one-speed commuter bikes. At a cost of $7 - $10, they would rent bikes for an average of 2.1 days a month, 2.7 days a month at $5 - $7 a day, 5.1 days at $3 - $5 a day, 6.3 days at $1 - $3 a day, and.5 days at no charge. Page 21

24 18) During a typical week, how many days per week do you currently park a motor vehicle on campus? Respondents who park on campus at least one day a week 0% 80 80% % % % 4 40% 30% 0% Prior to BuffOne Card March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 47 n = 480 n = 501 n = 487 n = 503 n = 504 n = 503 Mean number of days: Prior to Buff OneCard March October Prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard for CU employees, 64% of respondents parked on campus at least one day during an average week. In 2002, this number was down to 56%, a decrease of two percentage points from the previous year. Forty-six percent of respondents parked on campus for five days or more before they had a Buff OneCard available to them. This number had decreased to 38% this year, unchanged from The mean number of days respondents parked on campus during a typical week was 2.8 prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard, 2.5 in 2001 and 2.4 this year. Respondents who commute to work by bus at least once a week park on campus an average of 0.6 days a week, compared to 3.2 days for nonriders. Seventy-five percent of bus riders never park a car on campus, versus 30% of nonriders. From before the introduction of the Buff OneCard to May 2001, the percentage of staff respondents who parked on campus at least one day per week decreased from 60% to 56%. For faculty, this figure decreased significantly, from 80% to 56%. Page 22

25 1) During a typical month with 22 workdays, how many days do you currently park a motor vehicle on campus? On-campus parking: Average number of days per 22-workday month Staff Faculty No Buff OneCard Buff OneCard Total Average number of days Prior to Buff OneCard Note: Question not asked prior to May To get a better estimate of the Buff OneCard s impact on on-campus parking, respondents in 1 were asked for the number of days they park a motor vehicle on campus during a typical month with 22 work days, now and before the introduction of the Buff OneCard. Beginning in 2000, respondents were asked how often they park on campus now during that timeframe. Overall, the average number of days per month respondents parked on campus had decreased from before the Buff OneCard program to in May 1. By 2002, this figure had increased slightly to 10 days. Since before the start of the Buff OneCard program, the number of days staff respondents park on campus decreased from 11 to, and for faculty, it decreased from 14 to 11. Respondents who had not picked up their Buff OneCard reported a two-day increase for oncampus parking, from 11 to 13. Thirty-five percent of respondents in 2002 said they never park on campus during a typical month, compared to 34% last year and 27% before the start of the Buff OneCard program. This remains a statistically significant increase. Page 23

26 20) Do you currently have a CU parking permit? CU faculty and staff with a CU parking permit 80% % % % % 30% 0% Prior to BuffOne Card March 18 October Total Staff Faculty n = 47 n = 480 n = 501 n = 487 n = 504 n = 504 n = 503 Fifty-nine percent of all respondents had a CU parking permit before the Buff OneCard was available to them. By this year, this percentage showed a significant decrease to 51%. The percentage of faculty respondents with a CU parking permit also decreased significantly from prior to the Buff OneCard program to 2002, from 71% to 61%. For staff respondents, it decreased significantly from 56% prior to the introduction of the Buff OneCard to 47% in As can be expected, respondents who are current RTD riders were significantly less likely than nonriders to have a CU parking permit (18% versus 66%, respectively). In addition, staff respondents were less likely to have a parking permit than faculty respondents were (47% versus 61%, respectively). Page 24

27 21) If you have a CU parking permit, how much do you pay per month for your permit? Price paid per month for CU parking permit $37 44 $ $24 2 $0 2 Forty-four percent of respondents said they paid $37 per month for their CU parking permit. Another 17% paid $ Eighteen percent of respondents were unaware of how much they pay for their parking permit. Other 18 Don't know 18 0% 30% 40% 50% Base: Respondents who have a CU parking permit 23) Are you male or female? Respondents gender Fifty-two percent of respondents to the 2002 survey were female, 48% were male. Male 48% Female 52% Page 25

2011 Boulder Valley Employee Survey for Transportation Report of Results

2011 Boulder Valley Employee Survey for Transportation Report of Results 2011 Boulder Valley Employee Survey for Transportation Report of Results June 2012 Image from emerson12 via Flickr, Creative Commons Attribution. 2955 Valmont, Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 303 444 7863

More information

{insert employer} Employee Transportation Survey

{insert employer} Employee Transportation Survey {insert employer} Employee Transportation Survey {insert employer} is working with TransLink to broaden the range of commuting alternatives available to its employees. To do this, we need to know your

More information

MARIN TRANSIT 2008 Systemwide Onboard Survey

MARIN TRANSIT 2008 Systemwide Onboard Survey MARIN TRANSIT 2008 Systemwide Onboard Survey DRAFT SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by COREY, CANAPARY & GALANIS RESEARCH 447 Sutter Street Penthouse North San Francisco, CA 94108 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 EXECUTIVE

More information

118 One hundred Eighteen

118 One hundred Eighteen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ten 11 Eleven 12 Twelve 13 Thirteen 14 Fourteen 15 Fifteen 16 Sixteen 17 Seventeen 18 Eighteen 19 Nineteen 20 Twenty 21 Twenty 22 Twenty 23 Twenty 24 Twenty 25 Twenty 26 Twenty 27

More information

Cardiff Council Travel Planning Resources A Guide to Travel Surveys. A Guide to Travel Surveys

Cardiff Council Travel Planning Resources A Guide to Travel Surveys. A Guide to Travel Surveys A Guide to Travel Surveys 1 2009 Contents 1. Introduction to Travel Surveys 2. Sample Snapshot Travel Survey 3. Sample Travel Survey 4. Analysing Travel Survey data 5. Using Travel Survey data in developing

More information

City of Santa Barbara City Vehicle Use Policy

City of Santa Barbara City Vehicle Use Policy City of Santa Barbara City Vehicle Use Policy Approved by: James L. Armstrong City Administrator Policy effective: July 1, 2007 Purpose Provide written guidelines on the use of and safe operation of City

More information

Biennial Transportation Survey (AY) Of Madison, Wisconsin

Biennial Transportation Survey (AY) Of Madison, Wisconsin 2014 BIENNIAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY REPORT January 15, 2015 Cover image: The Lake Mendota shoreline is pictured in an aerial view of the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus looking toward the downtown

More information

Portsmouth City Council

Portsmouth City Council Portsmouth City Council 2014 Staff Travel Survey Results FINAL REPORT April 2014 integrated transport planning 2014 Staff Travel Survey Results FINAL REPORT April 2014 Produced by: Integrated Transport

More information

Tripp Umbach developed a detailed survey with input from the PDP and distributed the survey to six Downtown Pittsburgh market segments:

Tripp Umbach developed a detailed survey with input from the PDP and distributed the survey to six Downtown Pittsburgh market segments: I. INTRODUCTION In June 2005, the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership (PDP) retained the consulting firm, Tripp Umbach & Associates (TUA), to complete a comprehensive study of Downtown Pittsburgh transit and

More information

4. Home postcode (optional - only the first half of your postcode is required)

4. Home postcode (optional - only the first half of your postcode is required) 1. About You This travel survey is designed to help us understand how you travel to work and your reasons for travelling in this way. This information can then be used to hopefully improve your journey

More information

Guide to Employer Commuter Surveying

Guide to Employer Commuter Surveying BEST WORKPLACES FOR COMMUTERS SM GUIDE TO EMPLOYER COMMUTER SURVEYING Assessing and reporting on your commuter benefits program is an ideal means for you as one of the Best Workplaces for Commuters SM

More information

Ticket to Ride is an alternative transportation program offered through the Kentuckiana Regional Planning & Development Agency (KIPDA).

Ticket to Ride is an alternative transportation program offered through the Kentuckiana Regional Planning & Development Agency (KIPDA). Ticket to Ride is an alternative transportation program offered through the Kentuckiana Regional Planning & Development Agency (KIPDA). All of Ticket to Ride services are available to commuters that work

More information

TDC Heavy Vehicle Forecasts - February 2010 Release 2008/09 HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY. SUMMARY REPORT 2010 Release

TDC Heavy Vehicle Forecasts - February 2010 Release 2008/09 HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY. SUMMARY REPORT 2010 Release TDC Heavy Vehicle Forecasts - February 2010 Release 2008/09 HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT 2010 Release 0 About the Transport Data Centre The Transport Data Centre (TDC), of Transport NSW, provides

More information

NEW STUDENT SURVEY REPORT FOR FALL 2008 COHORT

NEW STUDENT SURVEY REPORT FOR FALL 2008 COHORT NEW STUDENT SURVEY REPORT FOR FALL 2008 COHORT of NEW and TRANSFER STUDENTS Introduction The New Student Survey has been administered to new and new transfer students in all twelve Connecticut Community

More information

2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report Prepared by: LDA Consulting Washington, DC 20015 (202) 548-0205 May 22, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report presents the results of the November 2012

More information

Arlington County FY12 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare

Arlington County FY12 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare Arlington County FY12 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare Arlington County Commuter Services Department of Environmental Services Arlington County, Virginia October 2012 Introduction Capital Bikeshare

More information

Office of Internal Audit

Office of Internal Audit Internal Audit Bear Line Shuttle Service Contract June 26, 2015 Office of Internal Audit Report No. 118-15 DATE: June 26, 2015 TO: CC: FROM: Tom Johnson, Director of Safety and Transportation Ken McClure,

More information

Acas Telephone Helpline: Findings from the 2004 Customer Survey 04/04

Acas Telephone Helpline: Findings from the 2004 Customer Survey 04/04 Acas Telephone Helpline: Findings from the 2004 Customer Survey 04/04 Prepared by: Acas Research and Evaluation Section and BMRB Social Research Part of BMRB International Limited Contents Acknowledgements

More information

University of Guelph Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Changing Our Travel Habits 2009/10 2019/20

University of Guelph Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Changing Our Travel Habits 2009/10 2019/20 University of Guelph Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Changing Our Travel Habits 2009/10 2019/20 Introduction: Over the years our society s dependence on the private automobile as the primary

More information

2014 Center City Commuter Mode Split Survey Survey Results

2014 Center City Commuter Mode Split Survey Survey Results 2014 Center City Commuter Mode Split Survey Survey Results Prepared by: 2 CONTENTS 1 Project Overview... 4 2 Summary of Methodology... 5 2.1 Sampling... 5 2.2 Data Collection... 5 2.3 Weighting and Analysis...

More information

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures 2012 Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division King Street Center, KSC-TR-0415 201 S. Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 206-553-3000 TTY Relay: 711 www.kingcounty.gov/metro

More information

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT South Jersey Bus Study

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT South Jersey Bus Study NEW JERSEY TRANSIT South Jersey Bus Study Final Report October 31 st, 2011 Prepared For: New Jersey TRANSIT One Penn Plaza East Newark, NJ 07105-2246 Prepared By: ICF Macro 40 Wall Street Suite 3400 New

More information

The Effects of ALA Accreditation Standards on Library Education Programs Accredited by the American Library Association

The Effects of ALA Accreditation Standards on Library Education Programs Accredited by the American Library Association The Effects of ALA Accreditation Standards on Library Education Programs Accredited by the American Library Association Michael E. Mounce Assistant Professor Delta State University Contact Information:

More information

The Menzies-Nous Australian Health Survey 2010

The Menzies-Nous Australian Health Survey 2010 The Menzies-Nous Australian Health Survey 2010 November 2010 Contents 1 Executive summary...1 1.1 Health and health services...1 1.2 Aged care services...2 2 Background...3 3 Health and health services...5

More information

MOUNTAIN HOUSE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER TEN AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

MOUNTAIN HOUSE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER TEN AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CHAPTER TEN AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CHAPTER TEN: AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT 10.1 INTRODUCTION 10.1 10.2 OVERALL ISSUES AND CROSS-REFERENCES 10.1 10.3 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND

More information

Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6737-1

Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6737-1 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6737-1 4. Title and Subtitle EXECUTIVE REPORT: TOLL ROADS, TOLL RATES, AND DRIVER BEHAVIOR 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. Technical Report Documentation

More information

Sun Rideshare Travel Database Instructions

Sun Rideshare Travel Database Instructions Sun Rideshare Travel Database Instructions Welcome to Sun Rideshare s Travel Database! The following instructions include the following topics: 1) First Time Registration 2) Log In 3) Guaranteed Ride Home

More information

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies Appendix Contents Transportation System Management Program Transportation Demand Management Program Regional Parking

More information

TERI ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY- 2012 DELHI NCR AND KARNATKA

TERI ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY- 2012 DELHI NCR AND KARNATKA TERI ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY- 2012 DELHI NCR AND KARNATKA 2 1. Introduction The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) conducted an online Environmental Survey in two selected geographical areas of India the

More information

2012 Traffic Safety Behaviors Survey Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety

2012 Traffic Safety Behaviors Survey Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2012 Traffic Safety

More information

Tennessee Vans EMPLOYEE VANPOOL LEASE PROGRAM. Lease Program provides vehicles,

Tennessee Vans EMPLOYEE VANPOOL LEASE PROGRAM. Lease Program provides vehicles, Tennessee Vans EMPLOYEE VANPOOL LEASE PROGRAM The Tennessee Vans mission is to facilitate the mobility of persons throughout Tennessee by assisting public agencies, private groups, and non-profit organizations

More information

6 REGIONAL COMMUTE PATTERNS

6 REGIONAL COMMUTE PATTERNS 6 REGIONAL COMMUTE PATTERNS INTRODUCTION One of the challenges for this study, which has a primary goal of looking at commute opportunities in MnDOT District 3, is that in some portions of the study area,

More information

The type of travel plan that is being submitted (Interim or Full Travel Plan)

The type of travel plan that is being submitted (Interim or Full Travel Plan) Suffolk Travel Plan Components Workplace Travel Plan Introduction Overview of the proposed development, including the estimated date of completion, or estimated time to construct fully, and if the development

More information

Notes of Guidance for School Transport to Non-Faith Secondary Schools

Notes of Guidance for School Transport to Non-Faith Secondary Schools Notes of Guidance for School Transport to Non-Faith Secondary Schools www.essex.gov.uk/schooltransport You can apply online at www.essex.gov.uk/schooltransport Notes of Guidance for School Transport to

More information

STATUS-QUO AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SENIOR BICYCLE RIDERS

STATUS-QUO AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SENIOR BICYCLE RIDERS STATUS-QUO AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SENIOR BICYCLE RIDERS Yoshitaka Motoda 1 1 Iwate Prefectural University, 152-52 Takizawa, Iwate, Japan Email for correspondence: motoda@iwate- pu.ac.jp ABSTRACT Significant

More information

Living After Stroke: Mobility and Transportation Options After Stroke. The Family of Community Transportation Options

Living After Stroke: Mobility and Transportation Options After Stroke. The Family of Community Transportation Options Living After Stroke: Mobility and Transportation Options After Stroke Karen Wolf-Branigin, MSW National Center on Senior Transportation Washington, DC The Family of Community Transportation Options This

More information

CARLINK ECONOMICS: AN EMPIRICALLY-BASED SCENARIO ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

CARLINK ECONOMICS: AN EMPIRICALLY-BASED SCENARIO ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CARLINK ECONOMICS: AN EMPIRICALLY-BASED SCENARIO ANALYSIS Susan Shaheen, PhD Institute of Transportation Studies-Davis, University of California, Davis and Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH),

More information

Development of an NTD Tool for Vanpool Services

Development of an NTD Tool for Vanpool Services Development of an NTD Tool for Vanpool Services Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida, Tampa November 2008 Final Report Contract Number: BD549-40 DISCLAIMER The opinions,

More information

No car? No problem! Getting around your community without a car. PLAN AHEAD. KEEP MOVING.

No car? No problem! Getting around your community without a car. PLAN AHEAD. KEEP MOVING. No car? No problem! Getting around your community without a car. PLAN AHEAD. KEEP MOVING. HOW DO YOU GET AROUND YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY? The key to getting around is to plan ahead; plan for the future now.

More information

Transportation Survey and Carbon Reduction Efficacy Analysis at California State University, East Bay and Contra Costa College

Transportation Survey and Carbon Reduction Efficacy Analysis at California State University, East Bay and Contra Costa College Transportation Survey and Carbon Reduction Efficacy Analysis at California State University, East Bay and Contra Costa College Professor Chris Johnson, Salt Lake Community College and Professor Michael

More information

APTA Surveys Transit Agencies on Providing Information and Real Time Arrivals to Customers

APTA Surveys Transit Agencies on Providing Information and Real Time Arrivals to Customers Policy Development and Research SEPTEMBER 2013 APTA Surveys Transit on Providing Information and Real Time Arrivals to Customers In July of 2012, APTA conducted a survey of its transit agency members,

More information

World Bank Bike Commuter Safety Survey. Anne Gaëlle Selod, MD Health Services Department, The World Bank Group

World Bank Bike Commuter Safety Survey. Anne Gaëlle Selod, MD Health Services Department, The World Bank Group World Bank Bike Commuter Safety Survey Anne Gaëlle Selod, MD Health Services Department, The World Bank Group Survey team Eric Swanson, PhD, Development Economics Vice Presidency, World Bank Staff Bike

More information

2015 Christmas Post-Campaign Tracking Research

2015 Christmas Post-Campaign Tracking Research ATTACHMENT 3 uary 2015 Christmas Post-Campaign Tracking Research Introduction Background Metro Vancouver first launched a Zero Waste Challenge Christmas campaign in 2009 to encourage residents to reduce

More information

INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT

INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT MARK BRUSSEL CONTENTS Examples of integration from the Netherlands Rationale and principles of integration

More information

POTOMAC AND RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VANSAVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE FOR EXISTING VANPOOLS. VANSAVE Program Eligibility Requirements

POTOMAC AND RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VANSAVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE FOR EXISTING VANPOOLS. VANSAVE Program Eligibility Requirements POTOMAC AND RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VANSAVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE FOR EXISTING VANPOOLS The VANSAVE Program for existing vanpools is designed to assist established vanpools, which have experienced

More information

BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CRASH SURVERY

BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CRASH SURVERY This survey includes questions regarding biking activity, accidents, and injuries, as well as the answer options provided by the Nashville MPO. Introduction 1. Have you ridden a bicycle within the past

More information

Transit Joint Powers Authority for Merced County

Transit Joint Powers Authority for Merced County Transit Joint Powers Authority for Merced County FINAL Short Range Transit Plan 2012-2017 Volume 3: Market Research Report Prepared by: TRANSITmarketing LLC In conjunction with: Mobility Planners LLC June

More information

Who is TOD in Metro Denver? April 2010. Employee Survey Report. Appendix E: Survey Methodology. Benchmarking the Evolution of TOD in Metro Denver

Who is TOD in Metro Denver? April 2010. Employee Survey Report. Appendix E: Survey Methodology. Benchmarking the Evolution of TOD in Metro Denver Who is TOD in Metro Denver? April 2010 Benchmarking the Evolution of TOD in Metro Denver Employee Survey Report Appendix E: Survey Methodology DRCOG Who is TOD in Metro Denver? Survey of Employees near

More information

The TMA Group VANPOOL RIDER AGREEMENT

The TMA Group VANPOOL RIDER AGREEMENT The TMA Group VANPOOL RIDER AGREEMENT Vanpool Rider: This Agreement is designed to promote the cooperation essential to the operation of a successful vanpool. It establishes the rights and responsibilities

More information

Quitline Tax Increase. Survey NEW ZEALAND POLICE CITIZENS SATISFACTION RESEARCH (TN/10/19) Six Month Follow Up. Contents

Quitline Tax Increase. Survey NEW ZEALAND POLICE CITIZENS SATISFACTION RESEARCH (TN/10/19) Six Month Follow Up. Contents Market Research Proposal Proposal Prepared For New Zealand Police Quitline Tax Increase Research Report Prepared for The Quit Group January 2011 Survey Six Month Follow Up NEW ZEALAND POLICE CITIZENS SATISFACTION

More information

2012 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

2012 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report 2012 Annual Report Saskatoon Transit provides a high quality of service for all citizens in our community, and is undertaking initiatives focused on building its ridership. Like most North American cities,

More information

School-related traffic congestion is a problem in

School-related traffic congestion is a problem in SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION Automated Vehicle Location for School Buses Can the Benefits Influence Choice of Mode for School Trips? TORI D. RHOULAC The author is Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,

More information

Bus Users in Sydney. Transport Data Centre ISSUES PAPER 2002/02 DECEMBER 2002 ISSN 1325-9253 ISBN 0 7313 2821 3

Bus Users in Sydney. Transport Data Centre ISSUES PAPER 2002/02 DECEMBER 2002 ISSN 1325-9253 ISBN 0 7313 2821 3 ISSUES PAPER 2002/02 DECEMBER 2002 ISSN 1325-9253 ISBN 0 7313 2821 3 Bus Users in Sydney Bus Users in Sydney presents the latest information on bus travel and bus travellers living in the Sydney Statistical

More information

Transportation Resources

Transportation Resources Boston Transportation Resources Welcome to Boston The Facilities Management team has been working closely with A Better City Transportation Management Association (ABC TMA) to provide you with a variety

More information

Article. Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 General Social Survey. by Martin Turcotte

Article. Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 General Social Survey. by Martin Turcotte Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-008-X Canadian Social Trends Article Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 General Social Survey by Martin Turcotte August 24, 2011 CST Standard symbols

More information

Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME. ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME. ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission PROGRAM GUIDELINES Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission PROGRAM GUIDELINES Updated January 2015 Contents Introduction 2 Program Basics 3 Program Registration

More information

TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT STUDENT TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT STUDENT TRANSPORTATION DEFINITIONS AUTHORITY FUNDING FOR ELIGIBLE STUDENTS For purposes of this policy: 1. Bus means a motor vehicle used to transport persons and designed to accommodate more than ten persons, including the

More information

Unhooking California: Eleven Things Californians Can Do NOW to Save Gasoline (and Money)

Unhooking California: Eleven Things Californians Can Do NOW to Save Gasoline (and Money) Unhooking California: Eleven Things Californians Can Do NOW to Save Gasoline (and Money) Kathryn Phillips Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies March 25, 2004 I. INTRODUCTION California

More information

The East End Customer Service Centre. - The Views of Users 2009

The East End Customer Service Centre. - The Views of Users 2009 The East End Customer Service Centre - The Views of Users This Research was Designed, Undertaken and Completed by: For further information please contact Lisa Grabham on: (0191) 2773487 Email: lisa.grabham@newcastle.gov.uk

More information

ITRACT Pilotsurvey. The use of apps for bus traffic in the Stavanger region

ITRACT Pilotsurvey. The use of apps for bus traffic in the Stavanger region ITRACT Pilotsurvey The use of apps for bus traffic in the Stavanger region Introduction The aim of this survey is to better understand the usage and the potential influence of apps for passenger bus traffic

More information

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015 ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015 The Bicycle 1973 ARC A Plan & Program for Its Use as a Mode of Transportation & Recreation The

More information

GENERAL These are some of the most common general questions relative to pupil transportation in Ohio.

GENERAL These are some of the most common general questions relative to pupil transportation in Ohio. GENERAL These are some of the most common general questions relative to pupil transportation in Ohio. What are the state laws for transporting children in my district? Laws for pupil transportation in

More information

High Mileage Moms - The Report

High Mileage Moms - The Report High Mileage Moms - The Report Mothers are spending more time behind the wheel than ever before, and this is leaving less time for the rest of their lives, for everything from playing with children to

More information

Occupational pension scheme governance

Occupational pension scheme governance GfK. Growth from Knowledge Occupational pension scheme governance A report on the 2014 (eighth) scheme governance survey Prepared for: The Pensions Regulator By: GfK Financial, May 2014 1 P a g e Contents

More information

Accuplacer Arithmetic Study Guide

Accuplacer Arithmetic Study Guide Accuplacer Arithmetic Study Guide Section One: Terms Numerator: The number on top of a fraction which tells how many parts you have. Denominator: The number on the bottom of a fraction which tells how

More information

Completing your Practice Placement Expenses claim form

Completing your Practice Placement Expenses claim form Student Services provided by Business Services Authority Completing your Practice Placement Expenses claim form A step by step guide for students (V1) 11/2014 Contents Introduction...3 Reimbursing placement

More information

ATTACHMENT A SHUTTLE SERVICE ROUTES

ATTACHMENT A SHUTTLE SERVICE ROUTES Page 1 of 32 Attachment A ATTACHMENT A SHUTTLE SERVICE ROUTES The shuttle service is detailed as follows: Employee Parking Lots Shuttle The Employee Shuttle transports Authority employees between the Employee

More information

11. Monitoring. 11.1 Performance monitoring in LTP2

11. Monitoring. 11.1 Performance monitoring in LTP2 178 11. Monitoring 11.1 Performance monitoring in LTP2 Performance against the suite of indicators adopted for LTP2 is shown in the following table. This shows progress between 2005/06 and 2009/10 (the

More information

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Customer Service and Operations Committee Information Item IV-C December 6, 2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Page 62 of 83 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information

More information

Tam Valley Call n Ride Shuttle Option April 2008

Tam Valley Call n Ride Shuttle Option April 2008 Tam Valley Call n Ride Shuttle Option April 2008 If funding is available to provide transit service to Tam Valley, Marin Transit staff recommends that a call-n-ride service is started. Survey data from

More information

VI. Demographics of Transit Demand

VI. Demographics of Transit Demand VI. Demographics of Transit Demand Demographics of service area and regional culture: The reasons that passengers use transit vary widely, and an understanding of patron needs is vital in prioritizing

More information

BULLETIN NO. 6. Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1. Car-share Basics PURPOSE: OVERVIEW:

BULLETIN NO. 6. Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1. Car-share Basics PURPOSE: OVERVIEW: Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces Section 307 of the City Planning Code mandates the Zoning Administrator to issue and adopt such rules, regulations and interpretations as are

More information

To take this survey online, visit:

To take this survey online, visit: To take this survey online, visit: www.njsaferoutes.org Dear Parent or Caregiver, Your child s school has partnered with the NJ Department of Transportation and researchers at the Rutgers University Voorhees

More information

ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION

ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION Dear Customer: Thank you for inquiring about applying for Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) Special Transportation Service (STS) eligibility. Enclosed is a copy of an Application

More information

University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois Transportation Bike Share Program

University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois Transportation Bike Share Program University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois Transportation Bike Share Program SCHOOL The University of Chicago is a private, 4-year institution with approximately 5,134 undergraduates and 10,492 graduate,

More information

2012 HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL PLANNING SURVEY

2012 HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL PLANNING SURVEY 2012 HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL PLANNING SURVEY A Summary of Key Findings July 23, 2012 Prepared for: Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. and the Consumer Federation of America Prepared by: Princeton

More information

Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan

Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan Department of Civil Engineering/TRIPP Indian Institute of Technology Delhi http://tripp.iitd.ac.in Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan K. Ramachandra Rao, G. Tiwari,

More information

The Office of Public Services Reform The Drivers of Satisfaction with Public Services

The Office of Public Services Reform The Drivers of Satisfaction with Public Services The Office of Public Services Reform The Drivers of Satisfaction with Public Services Research Study Conducted for the Office of Public Services Reform April - May 2004 Contents Introduction 1 Executive

More information

Transportation Management Plan. for. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Transportation Management Plan. for. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Transportation Management Plan for The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill December 2015 Prepared by: UNC - Chapel Hill Transportation & Parking 1.0 INTRODUCTION The University of North Carolina

More information

BICYCLE TRENDS IN CAMBRIDGE

BICYCLE TRENDS IN CAMBRIDGE BICYCLE TRENDS IN CAMBRIDGE Cambridge promotes bicycling as a healthy, environmentally friendly way of getting around as an important part of the City's efforts to improve mobility and protect our environment.

More information

Seat belt and mobile phone use surveys: England and Scotland, 2014

Seat belt and mobile phone use surveys: England and Scotland, 2014 Statistical Release 25 February 2015 Seat belt and mobile phone use surveys: England and Scotland, 2014 Main findings In 2014, 1.6% of all drivers and 1.4% of car drivers in England and Scotland were using

More information

If You Build It : The Impact of Street Improvements on Commercial Office Space

If You Build It : The Impact of Street Improvements on Commercial Office Space If You Build It : The Impact of Street Improvements on Commercial Office Space J.LIFF CO. 11 Fifth Avenue 9H New York, New York 10003 JUNE 2012 Location, location, location is the real estate mantra. So

More information

GTA Cordon Count Program

GTA Cordon Count Program Transportation Trends 2001-2011 Executive Summary Project No. TR12 0722 September 2013 1.0 Introduction The Cordon Count program was established to collect traffic data as a tool for measuring travel trends

More information

Bicycle Safety Webinar December 1 st 2010

Bicycle Safety Webinar December 1 st 2010 Bicycle Safety Webinar December 1 st 2010 Kay Teschke Kay Teschke is Professor in the Schools of Population and Public Health and of Environmental Health at the University of British Columbia. She is principal

More information

Like, post, share: Young Australians experience of social media

Like, post, share: Young Australians experience of social media Like, post, share: Young Australians experience of social media Quantitative research report prepared for the Australian Communications and Media Authority 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1.1 RESEARCH

More information

Vanpooling Made Easy:

Vanpooling Made Easy: Vanpooling Made Easy: An Informational Guide Published By: Third Edition May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page: Introduction... 1 What Is A Vanpool?... 2 How To Determine What Rules Would Apply To A Vanpool...

More information

2012 Vermont Household Health Insurance Survey: Comprehensive Report

2012 Vermont Household Health Insurance Survey: Comprehensive Report Vermont Department of Financial Regulation Insurance Division 2012 Vermont Household Health Insurance Survey: Comprehensive Report Brian Robertson, Ph.D. Jason Maurice, Ph.D. Table of Contents Page I.

More information

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES RETIREMENT PLAN PREFERENCES SURVEY REPORT OF FINDINGS. January 2004

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES RETIREMENT PLAN PREFERENCES SURVEY REPORT OF FINDINGS. January 2004 SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES RETIREMENT PLAN PREFERENCES SURVEY REPORT OF FINDINGS January 2004 Mathew Greenwald & Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 SETTING

More information

Whole Number and Decimal Place Values

Whole Number and Decimal Place Values Whole Number and Decimal Place Values We will begin our review of place values with a look at whole numbers. When writing large numbers it is common practice to separate them into groups of three using

More information

PME Inc. Final Report. Prospect Management. Legal Services Society. 2007 Tariff Lawyer Satisfaction Survey

PME Inc. Final Report. Prospect Management. Legal Services Society. 2007 Tariff Lawyer Satisfaction Survey PME Inc. Prospect Management 2007 Tariff Lawyer Satisfaction Survey Final Report October 2007 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...6 2. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES...9 3. METHODOLOGY...10 4. DETAILED

More information

Pupil Transportation Cost and Outsourcing Feasibility Study Performed for the West Plains R-VII Schools May 2013

Pupil Transportation Cost and Outsourcing Feasibility Study Performed for the West Plains R-VII Schools May 2013 Pupil Transportation Cost and Outsourcing Feasibility Study Performed for the West Plains R-VII Schools May 2013 The TransPar Group, Inc. of Lee s Summit, Missouri was engaged by the West Plains Schools

More information

PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE RESEARCH

PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE RESEARCH PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE RESEARCH ANALYTICAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2015 ABOUT COMRES ComRes provides specialist research and insight into reputation, public policy and communications. It is a founding member

More information

Diane Williams Senior Media Research Analyst Arbitron Inc. 212-887-1461 diane.williams@arbitron.com

Diane Williams Senior Media Research Analyst Arbitron Inc. 212-887-1461 diane.williams@arbitron.com Diane Williams Senior Media Research Analyst Arbitron Inc. 212-887-1461 diane.williams@arbitron.com Arbitron Out-of-Home Advertising Report 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Methodology... 2 Terms

More information

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SMALL TOWNS AN AREA WITH GREAT POTENTIAL

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SMALL TOWNS AN AREA WITH GREAT POTENTIAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SMALL TOWNS AN AREA WITH GREAT POTENTIAL Andreas Persson Department of Technology and Society, Lund Institute of Technology Sweden 1. INTRODUCTION The project Attractive Public Transport

More information

QUALITY OF LIFE REPORT

QUALITY OF LIFE REPORT / 01 SURVEY QUALITY OF LIFE REPORT Private Assets in 2015 Amount to 110 Trillion CNY respondents will increase luxury consumption next year 2.01 Million High Net Worth Families China's Growing Wealth respondents

More information

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall uhrcc@iastate.edu

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall uhrcc@iastate.edu Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall uhrcc@iastate.edu Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... - 3 - SECTION I - EXTERNAL COMPETITIVENESS...

More information

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report Focus on pedal cyclists Key findings The key findings from this article include: Pedal cyclist deaths have seen a long-term fall, but have fluctuated

More information

Bicycle and Public Transport Dream Team or Rivals? The Berlin Experience

Bicycle and Public Transport Dream Team or Rivals? The Berlin Experience Bicycle and Public Transport Dream Team or Rivals? The Berlin Experience Conference Integrated Urban Mobility Dresden, 12./13. March 2009 Burkhard Horn Senate Department for Urban Development, Berlin Overview

More information

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses Authority: History: Source of Authority: Related Links: Responsible Office: 05.179 Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses Vice Chancellor of Business Affairs Effective June 1,

More information

Downtown. Commute Survey. Central Houston, Inc.

Downtown. Commute Survey. Central Houston, Inc. Downtown Commute Survey 2013 Central Houston, Inc. About the 2013 Downtown Commute Survey About Central Houston, Inc. Central Houston, Inc. (CHI) is a private, nonprofit corporation supported by memberships

More information