Empiricism: Reloaded
|
|
- Ophelia Brooks
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Book Review Empiricism: Reloaded Paul Studtmann (2010) Empiricism and the Problem of Metaphysics, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 180 pages, index. Studtmann s Empiricism and the Problem of Metaphysics (hereafter EPM) is a lively reformulation of the empiricist challenge to metaphysics. Hume s famous version rejected anything that was not either experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence or abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number (Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section XII, Part 3). That was 1748, and the intervening period has seen a variety of re-statements of the challenge, especially by some of the logical empiricists and by Quine, as well as defences of metaphysics, perhaps most notably in recent decades by David Lewis. Just as importantly, a great deal has happened in science, logic and mathematics since Hume. This means that reasoning concerning matters of fact and abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number aren t what they used to be. Finally, open and un-embarrassed metaphysical debate is striking feature of Anglophone philosophy over the past few decades. For these reasons Studtmann s book is rather timely. Studtmann glosses the general problem of metaphysics as determining whether, and why, metaphysics can yield a set of well-confirmed theoretical results (EPM, p. 4). A thorough response to the problem of metaphysics at least for an antimetaphysical empiricist has to deal with each of three more specific problems relating to metaphysics: delineation, critique, and stance. Roughly they are the problems of saying what metaphysics is, specifying what is wrong with it (and why), and determining what the proper attitude to metaphysical theorising is. The most interesting parts of EPM are to be found in the connected treatment of the problems of delineation and critique. Metaphysical debates, proposes Studtmann, implicate modal concepts (EPM, p. 13f) which means, among other things, seeking knowledge of the modal status of some sentences (for example whether there is a necessarily existing being is itself necessarily true). Unlike Hume s characterisation, which specifies which books not to burn, this one is positive. Studtmann defends his delineation over chapters 4, 5 and 6 of EPM, arguing that a number of 1
2 paradigmatic metaphysical debates, as well as some in epistemology and ethics, implicate modal concepts in the required way. The function of modal concepts in these debates, proposes Studtmann, is in validating information-increasing inferences (EPM, p. 14). The formulation in terms of information is motivated partly in order to remain agnostic about psychological specifics. (Whether or not ideas and impressions make a come-back, psychological science will continue to recognise some information-carrying cognitive states.) The information talk is also supposed to do some heavy lifting. Here is a very broad sketch of the position. Information we get via the senses is (obviously) legitimate for empiricists. Some inferences especially first order extensionally valid ones are what Studtmann calls information decreasing (because one sentence validly entails another iff the set of models in which the latter is true is a sub-set of the models in which the former is true). These inferences require no special epistemic treatment, given that there are finite procedures for checking validity, and presumably Studtmann does not explicitly specify this as long as the information going in has a suitable sensory pedigree. With numbers treated adjectivally, sentences in finite arithmetic are also either valid or invalid (so, contra Kant, 7+5=12 is finitely valid, and requires no synthetic a priori). The same does not hold, of course, for arithmetic including axioms that quantify over infinite totalities, where finite procedures cannot decide validity, of which more anon. We can and sometimes do refer to deductively valid first-order arguments, and to theorems of finite arithmetic as necessary, but the necessity talk here is optional. This is not so for all cases where we are inclined to speak of necessities. Some sentences seem intuitively necessary ( Nothing is red all over and blue all over ) just as others seem intuitively contingent ( Peter is 5 feet tall ). Studtmann maintains that there are inferences that seem intuitively valid, but are not information decreasing, and offers inferring Socrates is unmarried from Socrates is a bachelor as an example. Here, he wants to say, the concept of necessity seems to have a clear and ineliminable role, because an un-stated premise to the effect that (x)(if x is a bachelor, then x is unmarried) validates the inference (EPM p. 31). This way of putting things is at least slightly quirky. Single sentences don t standardly entail more than they say, and paradigmatically valid inferences have two or more premises. (So Socrates is taller than Meletus is validly inferred from both Socrates is taller than Plato and 2
3 Plato is taller than Meletus, but not from either alone.) In Studtmann s specific example, the inference also turns out valid with the additional non-modal that (x)(if x is a Bachelor, then x is Unmarried). Studtmann s point, though, is that modal premises themselves are information increasing relative to what can be justified by experience, including finite logical operations on information from experience. (A putatively necessary sentence inferred from no other premises also gets called valid EPM, p31.) Studtmann s approach to the critique problem is two pronged. His shallow solution is to claim that modal concepts (that cannot be cashed out as first order validities or deflated in other ways) are theoretically illegitimate where this is understood as being an empirical claim that they won t find a stable home in the progressive development of scientific (and mathematical) theory. This is an empirical bet, which he does not directly defend. He also offers a deep solution, which is an argument concluding that all a priori knowledge is knowledge of the results of effective procedures (EPM, p. 18). This formulation seems paradoxical, but it means that scientific and mathematical knowledge taken as a priori will turn out, if it is indeed knowledge, to be the result of finite validity-establishing procedures, and so information decreasing. If true, this would explain the shallow solution. Rationalists disagree, holding that some means or other (such as rational intuition) warrants beliefs that go beyond what effective procedures can establish. By putting things in terms of information, it elegantly turns out that rationalists suppose themselves to have the abilities of what Turing called Oracles imaginary machines stipulated by fiat to be able to solve a decision problem after a single processing step, including a non-computable problem such as saying of some other machine whether it would halt on a given input or not. That is to say, although Studtmann does not put it exactly this way, Oracles are allowed to be hypercomputers, and rationalists (and anyone else holding modal beliefs to be justifiable) effectively take themselves to have some hypercomputational (Church-Turing thesis violating) powers. The argument for this proceduralist account of the a priori (which excludes Oracular knowledge, and effective procedures for modal claims) depends on the assumption that scientifically used information has sensory origin. This does not so much beg the question as make clear the challenge to the non-empiricist: Epistemically to justify a source of information that is both non-sensory and specifically capable of supporting modal knowledge. 3
4 This, Studtmann says, is the form of a solution to the problem of metaphysics, because he does not engage in substantial defence of the empirical premises. Empiricist philosophy of science provides, unsurprisingly, some support here. Van Fraassen (1987) maintained that accepting a scientific theory requires no more than recognising it as (if it is indeed so) empirically adequate to observable phenomena, and stops short both of realism about parts of theories concerning unobservables, and claims to modal knowledge. To be an empiricist is to withhold belief in anything that goes beyond the actual, observable phenomena, and to recognise no objective modality in nature (1987, p202-3). As Studtmann does, although with more detail, van Fraassen recognises that there is modal talk in science, but both urge against treating it as knowledge: modality appears in science only in that the language naturally used once a theory has been accepted, is modal language (The Scientific Image, p198). If Studtmann is correct (enough) about delimiting metaphysics, and the illegitimacy of modal concepts then the position of one aspiring to metaphysical knowledge is somewhat analogous to that of the Platonist according to Benacerraf (1973, see EPM, p58). Objective modal facts, like Platonic forms, have inadequate evidential footprints. It is worth noting that the epistemic challenge remains even for in some respects rather liberal versions of empiricism. Suppose, for example, an empiricist who was willing to count any set of contraptions that transduced physical information into human neural information as a sense organ. She would regard the mammalian eye, and the eye plus a telescope, and maybe even the eye plus the Large Hadron Collider (and the computational paraphernalia needed to present data from it) as all equally acceptable sense organs. Consequently she d regard some things (electrons, genes) as observable that are not observable for Van Fraassen, and others (the moons of Jupiter) as already observed. But she d be no better placed when it came to modal knowledge, or knowledge of mathematical assertions about completed infinities. In making this sketch I ve left out a great deal. Empiricism and the Problem of Metaphysics moves along at a cracking pace, is occasionally genuinely funny, and touches briefly on a very wide range of topics, including sub-arguments relevant to modal logic, additional challenges to claims of modal knowledge, and wider philosophical, mathematical and logical debates. Gödel turns up as a surprising ally of empiricism (EPM, p60-63). Inevitably many points are covered very briefly, and some conclusions are defended rather cryptically. The most obvious ways to refute the overall conclusion (at least without rejecting its terms) are either to produce a counter-example to the shallow solution, which is to say a modal concept 4
5 that is genuinely theoretically legitimate in science (or mathematics), or a credible modal epistemology. The latter task hardly looks promising for any position worth calling empiricist. Studtmann s proposed response to the stance problem is what he calls moderate silentism. This recognises metaphysical claims as meaningful, and metaphysical speculation as conceptually illuminating and even fun. It acknowledges the robust appearance of necessity as a psychological fact about us, but since modal concepts aren t legitimate is not concerned to assign any sort of truth-value to modal discourse (EPM, p21). This is milder than calling for metaphysical texts to be committed to the flames, and than denying that metaphysical claims are cognitively significant. It is self-consciously close to the attitude Hilbert (1926) recommended for the infinite. In that, it is a robust denial of modal realism, just as an empiricist position should be. David Spurrett (Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal) spurrett@ukzn.ac.za References Benacerraf, P. (1973) Mathematical Truth,The Journal of Philosophy, 70(19), pp Hilbert, D. (1926) Über das Unendliche, translated as On the Infinite in van Heijenoort, Jean (ed.), 1967, From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, , Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press van Fraassen, B. (1987) The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon. 5
CONCEPTUAL CONTINGENCY AND ABSTRACT EXISTENCE
87 CONCEPTUAL CONTINGENCY AND ABSTRACT EXISTENCE BY MARK COLYVAN Mathematical statements such as There are infinitely many prime numbers and 2 ℵ 0 > ℵ 0 are usually thought to be necessarily true. Not
More informationQuine on truth by convention
Quine on truth by convention March 8, 2005 1 Linguistic explanations of necessity and the a priori.............. 1 2 Relative and absolute truth by definition.................... 2 3 Is logic true by convention?...........................
More information1/9. Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas
1/9 Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas This week we are going to begin looking at a new area by turning our attention to the work of John Locke, who is probably the most famous English philosopher of all
More informationPlato gives another argument for this claiming, relating to the nature of knowledge, which we will return to in the next section.
Michael Lacewing Plato s theor y of Forms FROM SENSE EXPERIENCE TO THE FORMS In Book V (476f.) of The Republic, Plato argues that all objects we experience through our senses are particular things. We
More informationCosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke
Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God S. Clarke [Modified Fall 2009] 1. Large class of arguments. Sometimes they get very complex, as in Clarke s argument, but the basic idea is simple. Lets
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College. Lecture 3: Induction
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 3: Induction Hume s s Fork 2 Enquiry IV starts with a vital distinction between types of proposition: Relations of ideas can be known a priori
More informationPhilosophical argument
Michael Lacewing Philosophical argument At the heart of philosophy is philosophical argument. Arguments are different from assertions. Assertions are simply stated; arguments always involve giving reasons.
More informationA Short Course in Logic Zeno s Paradox
1 Grappling with Good Arguments A Short Course in Logic Zeno s Paradox We ve seen that if we decide that an argument is good then we should be inclined to believe that the ultimate conclusion is true.
More informationPhil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008. [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World
1 Putnam s Main Theses: 1. There is no ready-made world. Phil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008 [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World * [A ready-made world]: The world itself has to
More informationSelf-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem
Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem Adam Elga Analysis, 60(2): 143-147, 2000. In addition to being uncertain about what the world is like, one can also be uncertain about one s own spatial
More informationHow does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm?
How does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm? Eli Bjørhusdal After having published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962, Kuhn was much criticised for the use
More informationLinguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language. Noam Chomsky s well-known claim that linguistics is a branch of cognitive
Linguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language Noam Chomsky s well-known claim that linguistics is a branch of cognitive psychology (Chomsky 1972, 1) has generated a great deal of dissent not from
More informationDivine command theory
Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the semester, and the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory
More informationOne natural response would be to cite evidence of past mornings, and give something like the following argument:
Hume on induction Suppose you were asked to give your reasons for believing that the sun will come up tomorrow, in the form of an argument for the claim that the sun will come up tomorrow. One natural
More informationPsychology has been considered to have an autonomy from the other sciences (especially
THE AUTONOMY OF PSYCHOLOGY Tim Crane, University College London Psychology has been considered to have an autonomy from the other sciences (especially physical science) in at least two ways: in its subject-matter
More informationSubject area: Ethics. Injustice causes revolt. Discuss.
Subject area: Ethics Title: Injustice causes revolt. Discuss. 1 Injustice causes revolt. Discuss. When we explain phenomena we rely on the assertion of facts. The sun rises because the earth turns on its
More informationThe Refutation of Relativism
The Refutation of Relativism There are many different versions of relativism: ethical relativism conceptual relativism, and epistemic relativism are three. In this paper, I will be concerned with only
More informationPractical Research. Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Planning and Design. Tenth Edition
Practical Research Planning and Design Tenth Edition Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod 2013, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 The Nature and Tools of Research
More informationThe Null Hypothesis. Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington
The Null Hypothesis Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington Send correspondence to: Geoffrey R. Loftus Department of Psychology, Box 351525 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-1525 gloftus@u.washington.edu
More informationLecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories
Lecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Introduction The subjective theory of probability holds that the laws of probability are laws that rational
More informationThings That Might Not Have Been Michael Nelson University of California at Riverside mnelson@ucr.edu
Things That Might Not Have Been Michael Nelson University of California at Riverside mnelson@ucr.edu Quantified Modal Logic (QML), to echo Arthur Prior, is haunted by the myth of necessary existence. Features
More informationIn Defense of Kantian Moral Theory Nader Shoaibi University of California, Berkeley
In Defense of Kantian Moral Theory University of California, Berkeley In this paper, I will argue that Kant provides us with a plausible account of morality. To show that, I will first offer a major criticism
More informationWriting Thesis Defense Papers
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
More informationBoonin on the Future-Like-Ours Argument against Abortion. Pedro Galvão Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa
Boonin on the Future-Like-Ours Argument against Abortion Pedro Galvão Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa David Boonin s recent book 1 is an impressively deep and detailed attempt to establish
More informationHow To Understand The Relation Between Simplicity And Probability In Computer Science
Chapter 6 Computation 6.1 Introduction In the last two chapters we saw that both the logical and the cognitive models of scientific discovery include a condition to prefer simple or minimal explanations.
More informationCHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs
CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce
More informationWHAT IS THE SWAMPING PROBLEM?
1 WHAT IS THE SWAMPING PROBLEM? Duncan Pritchard University of Edinburgh ABSTRACT. It is argued that the swamping problem is best understood in terms of an inconsistent triad of claims: (i) a general thesis
More informationCould I Have Been a Turnip? A Very Short Introduction to the Philosophy of Modality
Could I Have Been a Turnip? A Very Short Introduction to the Philosophy of Modality Modality If something is possible, it could have happened. If something is necessary, it had to happen. If something
More informationA Few Basics of Probability
A Few Basics of Probability Philosophy 57 Spring, 2004 1 Introduction This handout distinguishes between inductive and deductive logic, and then introduces probability, a concept essential to the study
More informationIntroduction. My thesis is summarized in my title, No. God, No Laws : the concept of a law of Nature cannot be
No God, No Laws Nancy Cartwright Philosophy LSE and UCSD Introduction. My thesis is summarized in my title, No God, No Laws : the concept of a law of Nature cannot be made sense of without God. It is not
More informationOn Philipse s Attempt to Write Off All Deductive Cosmological Arguments
1 On Philipse s Attempt to Write Off All Deductive Cosmological Arguments Emanuel Rutten Abstract In his 2012 book God in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason Herman Philipse argues that
More informationMethodology in Social Psychology. Logics of inquiry
Methodology in Social Psychology Logics of inquiry How to carry out scientific research given our understanding of the nature of knowledge. Philosophy of Science clarifies why experimental, scientific
More informationKant s deontological ethics
Michael Lacewing Kant s deontological ethics DEONTOLOGY Deontologists believe that morality is a matter of duty. We have moral duties to do things which it is right to do and moral duties not to do things
More informationLast time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way:
Aquinas Third Way Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way: 1. 2. 3. 4. At least one thing has an efficient cause. Every causal chain must either be circular,
More informationor conventional implicature [1]. If the implication is only pragmatic, explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency.
44 ANALYSIS explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency. Let C1 and C2 be distinct moral codes formulated in English. Let C1 contain a norm N and C2 its negation. The moral
More informationCS 3719 (Theory of Computation and Algorithms) Lecture 4
CS 3719 (Theory of Computation and Algorithms) Lecture 4 Antonina Kolokolova January 18, 2012 1 Undecidable languages 1.1 Church-Turing thesis Let s recap how it all started. In 1990, Hilbert stated a
More informationKilling And Letting Die
[This essay originally appeared in the Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition, ed. Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker (New York: Routledge, 2001), vol. 2, pp. 947-50.] Killing And Letting Die Is it worse
More informationIntroduction to computer science
Introduction to computer science Michael A. Nielsen University of Queensland Goals: 1. Introduce the notion of the computational complexity of a problem, and define the major computational complexity classes.
More informationPHILOSOPHY Higher First edition published September 2006
PHILOSOPHY Higher First edition published September 2006 National Course Specification COURSE Philosophy (Higher) COURSE CODE C237 12 COURSE STRUCTURE This Course has four mandatory Units which are: DV55
More informationLogic and Reasoning Practice Final Exam Spring 2015. Section Number
Logic and Reasoning Practice Final Exam Spring 2015 Name Section Number The final examination is worth 100 points. 1. (5 points) What is an argument? Explain what is meant when one says that logic is the
More informationBuridan and the Avicenna-Johnston semantics
1 2 Buridan and the Avicenna-Johnston semantics Wilfrid Hodges Medieval Philosophy Network Warburg Institute, 1 April 2016 wilfridhodges.co.uk/history24.pdf Avicenna, c. 980 1037 3 4 Fak r al-dīn Rāzī
More information6.080 / 6.089 Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 6.080 / 6.089 Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
More informationExplain and critically assess the Singer Solution to Global Poverty
1 Explain and critically assess the Singer Solution to Global Poverty Introduction In this essay, I will summarise Singer's solution to world poverty, and then consider some of the objections that may
More informationSanford Shieh UNDECIDABILITY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND ANTI-REALIST INTUITIONISM
Sanford Shieh UNDECIDABILITY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND ANTI-REALIST INTUITIONISM In this paper I show that Michael Dummett s anti-realist intuitionism requires a significant place for epistemic principles. Specifically,
More informationHonours programme in Philosophy
Honours programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy offers students a broad and in-depth introduction to the main areas of Western philosophy and the philosophy
More informationKant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Winter, 2015/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationKant on Time. Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004
Kant on Time Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004 In the Transcendental Aesthetic of his Critique of Pure Reason, Immanuel Kant offers a series of dense arguments
More informationHow To Answer The Question Of If There Is A God Or Not In The World
NO ^US 39:2 (2005) 256 283 A Puzzle about Ontology THOMAS HOFWEBER University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1 Ontology Ontology is the philosophical discipline that tries to find out what there is:
More informationThe Meta-Problem of Change
NOÛS 43:2 (2009) 286 314 The Meta-Problem of Change THOMAS HOFWEBER University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1. Introduction One of the central problems in metaphysics over the last so many centuries
More information7 Bachelor s degree programme in the Philosophy of a Specific Scientific Discipline
7 Bachelor s degree programme in the Philosophy of a Specific Scientific Discipline 7.1 General introduction to degree programmes in the Philosophy of a Specific Scientific Discipline This chapter contains
More informationWhat Is Induction and Why Study It?
1 What Is Induction and Why Study It? Evan Heit Why study induction, and indeed, why should there be a whole book devoted to the study of induction? The first reason is that inductive reasoning corresponds
More informationThe John Locke Lectures 2009. Being Realistic about Reasons. T. M. Scanlon. Lecture 3: Motivation and the Appeal of Expressivism
The John Locke Lectures 2009 Being Realistic about Reasons T. M. Scanlon Lecture 3: Motivation and the Appeal of Expressivism The cognitivist view I have been defending has two important features in common
More informationRegular Languages and Finite Automata
Regular Languages and Finite Automata 1 Introduction Hing Leung Department of Computer Science New Mexico State University Sep 16, 2010 In 1943, McCulloch and Pitts [4] published a pioneering work on a
More informationReply to French and Genone Symposium on Naïve Realism and Illusion The Brains Blog, January 2016. Boyd Millar millar.boyd@gmail.
Reply to French and Genone Symposium on Naïve Realism and Illusion The Brains Blog, January 2016 Boyd Millar millar.boyd@gmail.com 1. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the managing editor of The Brains
More informationSemantic Groundedness
Semantic Groundedness Hannes Leitgeb LMU Munich August 2011 Hannes Leitgeb (LMU Munich) Semantic Groundedness August 2011 1 / 20 Luca told you about groundedness in set theory. Now we turn to groundedness
More informationThis asserts two sets are equal iff they have the same elements, that is, a set is determined by its elements.
3. Axioms of Set theory Before presenting the axioms of set theory, we first make a few basic comments about the relevant first order logic. We will give a somewhat more detailed discussion later, but
More informationSkepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds
Skepticism about the external world & the problem of other minds So far in this course we have, broadly speaking, discussed two different sorts of issues: issues connected with the nature of persons (a
More informationWriter moves somewhat beyond merely paraphrasing someone else s point of view or
RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING STUDENT PHILOSOPHY ESSAYS (APPLIED ETHICS/PHILOSOPHY OF ART AND CULTURE CONCENTRATIONS) Explanation of the rubric: The rubric incorporates aspects of an already existing model for
More informationDeductive reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which, roughly, the truth of the input
Forthcoming in The Encyclopedia of the Mind, edited by Hal Pashler, SAGE Publishing. Editorial Board: Tim Crane, Fernanda Ferreira, Marcel Kinsbourne, and Rich Zemel. Deductive Reasoning Joshua Schechter
More informationLinguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language. Noam Chomsky s well-known claim that linguistics is a branch of cognitive
Linguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language Noam Chomsky s well-known claim that linguistics is a branch of cognitive psychology (Chomsky 1972, 1) has generated a great deal of dissent, not from
More informationLecture 1: Conceptual Tools in Metaphysics
Lecture 1: Conceptual Tools in Metaphysics Ted Sider May 14, 2016 1. Tools in metaphysics By tools in metaphysics I mean the core concepts used to articulate metaphysical problems. They re a lens through
More informationThe Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas
The Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas René Descartes and John Locke, two of the principal philosophers who shaped modern philosophy, disagree on several topics; one of them concerns
More informationWRITING PROOFS. Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology
WRITING PROOFS Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology A theorem is just a statement of fact A proof of the theorem is a logical explanation of why the theorem is true Many theorems have this
More informationFREEDOM AND TRUTH IN MATHEMATICS
DANIEL BONEVAC FREEDOM AND TRUTH IN MATHEMATICS "The very essence of mathematics," Georg Cantor wrote in 1883, "is its freedom." 1 Few philosophers of mathematics in the intervening 100 years have taken
More informationDoes rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp. 349 74.
Does rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp. 349 74. 1. Rationality and responding to reasons Some philosophers think that rationality
More informationWRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY
198 PHILOSOPHY (College of Arts and Sciences) DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY 341 0 DOWD HALL (248) 370-3390 Fax: (248) 370-3144 Chairperson: Paul R. Graves Professor emeritus: Richard W. Brooks Professors: David
More informationZ.6: The Identity Thesis
Z.6: The Identity Thesis The problem At 1032a5, Aristotle claims that in the case of primary things, those spoken of in their own right, a thing and its essence are one and the same. What does this mean?
More informationDecision Making under Uncertainty
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
More informationBiological kinds and the causal theory of reference
Biological kinds and the causal theory of reference Ingo Brigandt Department of History and Philosophy of Science 1017 Cathedral of Learning University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 E-mail: inb1@pitt.edu
More informationReview. Bayesianism and Reliability. Today s Class
Review Bayesianism and Reliability Models and Simulations in Philosophy April 14th, 2014 Last Class: Difference between individual and social epistemology Why simulations are particularly useful for social
More informationInductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7. Inductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning Page 1 of 7 Inductive Reasoning We learned that valid deductive thinking begins with at least one universal premise and leads to a conclusion that is believed to be contained in the
More informationLecture 2. What is the Normative Role of Logic?
Lecture 2. What is the Normative Role of Logic? What is the connection between (deductive) logic and rationality? One extreme: Frege. A law of logic is a law of rational thought. Seems problematic, if
More informationJOHN STUART MILL. John Skorupski. m London and New York
JOHN STUART MILL John Skorupski m London and New York Contents Preface Abbreviations xi xv 1 THE MILLIAN PHILOSOPHY 1 1 Philosophy and its past 1 2 Logic and metaphysics 5 3 Ethics and politics 12 4 The
More informationWhy economics needs ethical theory by John Broome, University of Oxford
Why economics needs ethical theory by John Broome, University of Oxford For the meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 2000. Economics is a branch of ethics. Well, that
More informationESSENCE AND MODALITY. Kit Fine. Philosophy, NYU. June, 1992; revised February, 1993
ESSENCE AND MODALITY Kit Fine Philosophy, NYU June, 1992; revised February, 1993 The concept of essence has played an important role in the history and development of philosophy; and in no branch of the
More informationConservation of Energy is Relevant to Physicalism
dialectica Vol. 61, N 4 (2007), pp. 573 582 DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01124.x Notes and Discussions Conservation of Energy is Relevant to Physicalism Ole Koksvik Abstract I argue against Barbara Montero
More informationHOW TO WRITE A CRITICAL ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. John Hubert School of Health Sciences Dalhousie University
HOW TO WRITE A CRITICAL ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY John Hubert School of Health Sciences Dalhousie University This handout is a compilation of material from a wide variety of sources on the topic of writing a
More informationGRANT OBINWA NWAOGU UD3094HEA7419 PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION THE SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL STUDIES ATLANTIC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
GRANT OBINWA NWAOGU UD3094HEA7419 PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION THE SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL STUDIES ATLANTIC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 : Introduction 1 Chapter 2 : Philosophy As
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2 Proofs Intuitively, the concept of proof should already be familiar We all like to assert things, and few of us
More informationHow To Teach Philosophy
PHILOSOPHY MAJOR/MINOR DISTRIBUTIVE REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY VALUE THEORY PHIL209I PHIL209K PHIL209N PHIL230 PHIL236 PHIL250
More informationCOMPARATIVES WITHOUT DEGREES: A NEW APPROACH. FRIEDERIKE MOLTMANN IHPST, Paris fmoltmann@univ-paris1.fr
COMPARATIVES WITHOUT DEGREES: A NEW APPROACH FRIEDERIKE MOLTMANN IHPST, Paris fmoltmann@univ-paris1.fr It has become common to analyse comparatives by using degrees, so that John is happier than Mary would
More informationPascal is here expressing a kind of skepticism about the ability of human reason to deliver an answer to this question.
Pascal s wager So far we have discussed a number of arguments for or against the existence of God. In the reading for today, Pascal asks not Does God exist? but Should we believe in God? What is distinctive
More informationPHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16
PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16 In order to make an argument, you have to make a claim (the conclusion) and you have to give some evidence for the claim (the premises). Bush tried to justify the war
More information[Draft Do not cite] General Practical Philosophy in Kant s Groundwork
[Draft Do not cite] General Practical Philosophy in Kant s Groundwork In a little discussed passage of the Groundwork, Kant distinguishes his own metaphysics of morals (the topic of the Groundwork itself)
More informationTheory of Automated Reasoning An Introduction. Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Theory of Automated Reasoning An Introduction Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho Intended as compulsory reading for the Spring 2004 course on Automated Reasononing at Department of Mathematical Information Technology,
More informationOracle Turing machines faced with the verification problem
Oracle Turing machines faced with the verification problem 1 Introduction Alan Turing is widely known in logic and computer science to have devised the computing model today named Turing machine. In computer
More informationComputability Theory
CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook and T. Pitassi) Fall, 2014 Computability Theory This section is partly inspired by the material in A Course in Mathematical Logic by Bell and Machover, Chap 6, sections 1-10.
More informationTuring Machines: An Introduction
CIT 596 Theory of Computation 1 We have seen several abstract models of computing devices: Deterministic Finite Automata, Nondeterministic Finite Automata, Nondeterministic Finite Automata with ɛ-transitions,
More informationWarrant: The part of the arguments that sets up a logical connection between the grounds and the claim. (Reason) (Scientific Method = Hypothesis)
Toulmin Method of Argumentation Critical thinking and the ability to write well are of primary importance in our Magnet Program. The heart of good writing is good thinking. Writing is not only an end in
More informationTwo-Dimensional Semantics
Two-Dimensional Semantics David J. Chalmers Philosophy Program Research School of Social Sciences Australian National University Two-dimensional approaches to semantics, broadly understood, recognize two
More informationMILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.
MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility Mill s principle combines theories of the right
More informationANOTHER GENERATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION
ANOTHER GENERATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION Peter K. Bol Charles H. Carswell Professor of East Asian Languages and Civilizations I was asked to set forth some personal reflections rather than to summarize
More informationHow should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence?
Subject: Title: Word count: Epistemology How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence? 2,707 1 How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it
More informationIn this essay, I will first outline my understanding of the basis for Kant's categorical
I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law. What does Kant mean by this, and does it give the right kind of guidance when we are choosing
More informationThe Bayesian Approach to the Philosophy of Science
The Bayesian Approach to the Philosophy of Science Michael Strevens For the Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, second edition The posthumous publication, in 1763, of Thomas Bayes Essay Towards Solving
More information8. Inductive Arguments
8. Inductive Arguments 1 Inductive Reasoning In general, inductive reasoning is reasoning in which we extrapolate from observed experience (e.g., past experience) to some conclusion (e.g., about present
More informationComputational complexity theory
Computational complexity theory Goal: A general theory of the resources needed to solve computational problems What types of resources? Time What types of computational problems? decision problem Decision
More informationMathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction In logic, we often want to prove that every member of an infinite set has some feature. E.g., we would like to show: N 1 : is a number 1 : has the feature Φ ( x)(n 1 x! 1 x) How
More informationON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) General Observations on The Transcendental Aesthetic To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain, as clearly as possible,
More information