PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 1/16 In order to make an argument, you have to make a claim (the conclusion) and you have to give some evidence for the claim (the premises). Bush tried to justify the war with Iraq by citing the danger of WMDs. But now we ve found out that there were no WMDs. So, either Bush lied, or he got bad intelligence. If Bush got bad intelligence, then he made some really terrible appointments to top posts in the CIA. Therefore, either Bush is a liar, or he s incompetent. Two components of an argument: 1. Conclusion 2. Premises

2 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 2/16 The components of arguments are all statements something that can be true or false. ( bivalence ) Examples: The ten millionth digit in the decimal expansion of π is 2. The helium atom has a single electron. Not all sentences are statements. For example: Let s watch Hasselhoff s Berlin wall video again!

3 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 3/16 Deductive Arguments In a deductive argument, the intention is to show that the conclusion follows from the premises with absolute certainty. Conclusion follows from the premises. Conclusion is entailed by the premises. Conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises. The premises imply the conclusion. The premises justify the conclusion. Deductive arguments occur in the wild, and can be spotted in mathematics and computer science departments, and occasionally in some philosophy departments.

4 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 4/16 Non-deductive arguments 1. My friend Adam took PHI 201, and he got hired by Goldman-Sachs. 2. The best student in logic last year is now the international table-tennis champion. 3. It s rumored that Brooke Shields dated a student who was taking PHI Students who take PHI 201 live happy and successful lives.

5 Inductive arguments: (Occur frequently in the empirical sciences) The premises state that a certain fact holds in specific cases, and the conclusion states that the fact holds in general. PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 5/16

6 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 6/16 Aims of the Science of Logic Uncover the general principles that distinguish between good and bad deductive arguments. Uncover the basic rules of thought that any rational human being should follow. Critically examine the laws of logic.

7 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 7/16 Most academic fields of study are descriptive: They tell us how nature and people do, in fact, behave. (e.g., chemistry, biology, psychology, anthropology, physics) Philosophy (and specifically logic) aspires to be prescriptive, or normative. In ethics, we study how people ought to behave, not how they do in fact behave. In logic, we study how people ought to think, not how they do in fact think.

8 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 8/16 Good and Bad Arguments 1. A majority of Americans believe that it is wrong to cheat on your taxes. 2. If the majority of Americans believe it, then it must be true. 3. It is wrong to cheat on your taxes. 1. It is morally wrong to kill an innocent human being. 2. A fetus is an innocent human being. 3. It is morally wrong to kill a fetus.

9 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 9/16 Good and Bad Arguments 1. If God does not exist, then life is meaningless. 2. God exists. 3. Life is meaningful. 1. Only people born in the US are eligible to become President. 2. John Edwards was born in the US. 3. John Edwards is eligible to become President.

10 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 10/16 We will replace the vague word good with a precisely defined word: sound. A sound argument has two features. 1. It uses good evidence i.e., its premises are all true. 2. The conclusion follows logically from the premises. Definition: An argument is valid if its conclusion follows logically from its premises if it is impossible for the premises all to be true, but for the conclusion to be false. Nota Bene: A valid argument need not have true premises, nor a true conclusion validity requires only that if the premises were true then the conclusion would also be true.

11 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 11/16 Mini Quiz 1. If an argument has true premises and true conclusion is it sound? 2. If an argument has a false conclusion is it invalid? Premises Conclusion Validity True True? True False Invalid False True? False False?

12 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 12/16 Demonstrating Invalidity If God doesn t exist then there aren t any moral rules. God exists. There are moral rules. If Princeton isn t in the US then it isn t in CA. Princeton is in the US. Princeton is in CA. True True False

13 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 13/16 Formal Logic Starting Assumption of Formal Logic: Whether or not an argument is valid depends only on its form; its content is irrelevant to validity. (Logic is blind to the actual facts. ) Logic contains no matter at all, only form of thought. (Immanuel Kant) If two arguments have the same form, either they are both valid, or they are both invalid. But arguments don t wear their form on their sleeve.

14 1. Either God exists or everything 1. Either G or E is permitted. 2. God does not exist. 2. not-g 3. Everything is permitted. 3. E PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 14/16

15 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 15/16 1. If God doesn t exist then 1. If not-g then not-m there aren t any moral rules. 2. God exists. 2. G 3. There are moral rules. 3. M 1. If PU is not in the US then 1. If not-u then not-c it isn t in CA. 2. PU is in the US. 2. U 3. PU is in California. 3. C

16 PHI 201, Introductory Logic p. 16/16 Argument Forms An argument A is an instance of the form F just in case A results from a uniform replacement of words/sentences for blanks in F. A counterexample to an argument A is a an argument A that has the same form as A, and where A has (actually) true premises and a false conclusion. An argument A is valid just in case there is no counterexample to A. For thought: Can we ever know for sure that an argument is valid? How can we be sure that someone won t find a counterexample?

Philosophical argument

Michael Lacewing Philosophical argument At the heart of philosophy is philosophical argument. Arguments are different from assertions. Assertions are simply stated; arguments always involve giving reasons.

P1. All of the students will understand validity P2. You are one of the students -------------------- C. You will understand validity

Validity Philosophy 130 O Rourke I. The Data A. Here are examples of arguments that are valid: P1. If I am in my office, my lights are on P2. I am in my office C. My lights are on P1. He is either in class

Kant s deontological ethics

Michael Lacewing Kant s deontological ethics DEONTOLOGY Deontologists believe that morality is a matter of duty. We have moral duties to do things which it is right to do and moral duties not to do things

My Revision Notes: Edexcel A2 Religious Studies Developments: Philosophy of Religion and Ethics

My Revision Notes: Edexcel A2 Religious Studies Developments: Philosophy of Religion and Ethics These are guidelines of what might be included but are by no means exhaustive or even the only way to answer

A Short Course in Logic Example 8

A Short ourse in Logic xample 8 I) Recognizing Arguments III) valuating Arguments II) Analyzing Arguments valuating Arguments with More than one Line of Reasoning valuating If then Premises Independent

A Short Course in Logic Zeno s Paradox

1 Grappling with Good Arguments A Short Course in Logic Zeno s Paradox We ve seen that if we decide that an argument is good then we should be inclined to believe that the ultimate conclusion is true.

A Few Basics of Probability

A Few Basics of Probability Philosophy 57 Spring, 2004 1 Introduction This handout distinguishes between inductive and deductive logic, and then introduces probability, a concept essential to the study

Divine command theory

Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the semester, and the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory

DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE REASONING Expectations 1. Take notes on inductive and deductive reasoning. 2. This is an information based presentation -- I simply want you to be able to apply this information to

PROOF AND PROBABILITY(teaching notes)

PROOF AND PROBABILITY(teaching notes) In arguing for God s existence, it is important to distinguish between proof and probability. Different rules of reasoning apply depending on whether we are testing

Turning Numbers into Knowledge

Turning Numbers into Knowledge MASTERING THE ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING Second Edition JONATHAN G. KOOMEY, PH.D. Analytics Press PO Box 20313 Oakland, CA 94620-0313 http://www.analyticspress.com http://www.numbersintoknowledge.com

Argument Mapping 2: Claims and Reasons

#2 Claims and Reasons 1 Argument Mapping 2: Claims and Reasons We ll start with the very basics here, so be patient. It becomes far more challenging when we apply these basic rules to real arguments, as

Review of Kant and the Moral Argument

Review of Kant and the Moral Argument Objectives: 1. To review Kant s ethical theory to ensure that students understand the theory and its implications. Learning strategy 1. What makes an action moral?

In this essay, I will first outline my understanding of the basis for Kant's categorical

I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law. What does Kant mean by this, and does it give the right kind of guidance when we are choosing

Kant s Normative Ethics Brad Hooker

Kant s Normative Ethics Brad Hooker One central moral idea is that your doing some act is morally permissible only if others doing that act would also be morally permissible. There are a number of different

Ethics: What Is Right?

8 Ethics: What Is Right? The word ethics comes from the Greek word ethos, meaning custom. The Latin equivalent of this term is mores (customs), from which we derive our words moral and morality. Although

A. Arguments are made up of statements, which can be either true or false. Which of the following are statements?

Critical Thinking University of St Andrews March 2007 Bullet point material is not on the students copies. Feel free to use the material as you see fit, depending on timing, ability, enthusiasm etc. Good

Is this statement: (a) true; (b) false; (c) incoherent? What can we learn from a consideration of the statement?

PHILOSOPHY@BHASVIC 1 MOVING ON TO A-LEVEL PHILOSOPHY AT BHASVIC Doing philosophy is not merely giving your opinion or dismissing the opinions of others. We all hold a variety of opinions on a variety of

Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2015 Test 2 Answers

1. Descartes, Locke and Berkeley all believe that Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2015 Test 2 Answers a. nothing exists except minds and the ideas in them. b. we can t ever be justified in believing in

Evidential Arguments from Evil

24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger September 26, 200 I. Reasons: Inductive and Deductive Evidential Arguments from Evil We ve been considering whether it is rational to believe that an

Divine Command Theory

Divine Command Theory 1. Divine Command Theory: This is the view that rightness stems from God s commands: That is, an action is right if God commands it, and wrong if He forbids it. On this view, morality

Invalidity in Predicate Logic

Invalidity in Predicate Logic So far we ve got a method for establishing that a predicate logic argument is valid: do a derivation. But we ve got no method for establishing invalidity. In propositional

Controlling Your Emotions and Behavior Regardless of How Disagreeably Others Treat You John W. Maag, Ph.D.

Controlling Your Emotions and Behavior Regardless of How Disagreeably Others Treat You John W. Maag, Ph.D. 202 Barkley Memorial Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0732 (402) 472-5477

Formal Logic Lecture 2

Faculty of Philosophy Formal Logic Lecture 2 Peter Smith Peter Smith: Formal Logic, Lecture 2 1 Outline Validity again Systematicity and formality Modality and the invalidity principle The counterexample

CS250: Discrete Math for Computer Science. L1: Course Overview & Intro to Language of Math

CS250: Discrete Math for Computer Science L1: Course Overview & Intro to Language of Math What is this course about? Rigorous introduction to discrete mathematics and language of math. Structures and concepts

Writing Political Theory Papers

Writing Political Theory Papers Political theory is a little bit different than political science. Here are some important differences. 1) It s more like philosophy than social science: it is more concerned

Ethical Egoism. 1. What is Ethical Egoism?: Let s turn to another theory about the nature of morality: Ethical Egoism.

Ethical Egoism 1. What is Ethical Egoism?: Let s turn to another theory about the nature of morality: Ethical Egoism. Ethical Egoism: The morally right action is the one that best promotes the agent s

KANTIAN DEONTOLOGY KANTIAN DEONTOLOGY

KANTIAN DEONTOLOGY A. What is Deontology? 1. Deontological approaches in ethics usually contrasted with teleological approaches. 2. A teleological theory is goal oriented: - a morally right act is one

Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Fall, 2015

Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Fall, 2015 Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108

WHERE DO OUR MORALS COME FROM? Moral relativism and self-interest theory

WHERE DO OUR MORALS COME FROM? Moral relativism and self-interest theory In pairs, discuss the following questions: Are there any other living creatures that live moral lives? Discuss. Where does morality

Chapter 5: Fallacies. 23 February 2015

Chapter 5: Fallacies 23 February 2015 Plan for today Talk a bit more about arguments notice that the function of arguments explains why there are lots of bad arguments Turn to the concept of fallacy and

NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATING EMS INSTRUCTORS AUGUST 2002

MODULE 5: ETHICS Cognitive Goals At the completion of this module, the student-instructor should be able to: 5.1 Use their own words to define ethics and morals 5.2 Use their own words to identify and

The Cosmological Argument

A quick overview An a posteriori argument Everything that exists in the universe exists because it was caused by something else. That something was caused by something else It is necessary for something

CHAPTER 7 ARGUMENTS WITH DEFIITIONAL AND MISSING PREMISES

CHAPTER 7 ARGUMENTS WITH DEFIITIONAL AND MISSING PREMISES What You ll Learn in this Chapter In Chapters -5, we developed a skill set that s sufficient for the recognition, analysis, evaluation and construction

Lecture Notes William L. Rowe, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism (1979) Keith Burgess-Jackson 22 November 2015

Lecture Notes William L. Rowe, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism (1979) Keith Burgess-Jackson 22 November 2015 Introduction. Rowe (1931-2015) asks and answers three interrelated questions

Slippery Slopes and Vagueness

Slippery Slopes and Vagueness Slippery slope reasoning, typically taken as a fallacy. But what goes wrong? Is it always bad reasoning? How should we respond to a slippery slope argument and/or guard against

Is Your Financial Plan Worth the Paper It s Printed On?

T e c h n o l o g y & P l a n n i n g Is Your Financial Plan Worth the Paper It s Printed On? By Patrick Sullivan and Dr. David Lazenby, PhD www.scenarionow.com 2002-2005 ScenarioNow Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Leibniz s solution to the problem of evil

Leibniz s solution to the problem of evil James Franklin Think 5 (Autumn 2003), 97-101 Mark Piper s article `The perennial problem of evil (Think 4) summarises received ideas on the question. They are:

8. Inductive Arguments

8. Inductive Arguments 1 Inductive Reasoning In general, inductive reasoning is reasoning in which we extrapolate from observed experience (e.g., past experience) to some conclusion (e.g., about present

Arguments and Methodology INTRODUCTION

chapter 1 Arguments and Methodology INTRODUCTION We should accept philosophical views in general, and moral views in particular, on the basis of the arguments offered in their support. It is therefore

Analysis of a Bad Argument SCIENTIFIC PROOF ELOHIM/GOD EXISTS! (http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=jnykjk6v_oq) Instructions: Students should read the transcript given below. It contains a complex argument,

INTELLECTUAL APPROACHES

Michael Lacewing Can social science explain away religion? The view of religion taken by social scientists has changed considerably over the last 150 years. (A helpful review of the first 100 years is

IS HUME S ACCOUNT SCEPTICAL?

Michael Lacewing Hume on knowledge HUME S FORK Empiricism denies that we can know anything about how the world outside our own minds is without relying on sense experience. In IV, Hume argues that we can

or conventional implicature [1]. If the implication is only pragmatic, explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency.

44 ANALYSIS explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency. Let C1 and C2 be distinct moral codes formulated in English. Let C1 contain a norm N and C2 its negation. The moral

Ethics Handout 24 Harry Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility

24.231 Ethics Handout 24 Harry Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility Classic Incompatibilist Argument: (1) If determinism is true, then every human action is causally necessitated.

Philosophy 104. Chapter 8.1 Notes

Philosophy 104 Chapter 8.1 Notes Inductive reasoning - The process of deriving general principles from particular facts or instances. - "induction." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,

One natural response would be to cite evidence of past mornings, and give something like the following argument:

Hume on induction Suppose you were asked to give your reasons for believing that the sun will come up tomorrow, in the form of an argument for the claim that the sun will come up tomorrow. One natural

ATHK1001 Analytical Thinking

ATHK1001 Analytical Thinking Unit of Study Code: ATHK1001 Coordinator: Other lecturing staff: Dr Bruce Burns Office: Room 512 Griffith Taylor Building Phone: 9351 8286 E-mail: bruce.burns@sydney.edu.au

Omnipotence & prayer

Omnipotence & prayer Today, we ll be discussing two theological paradoxes: paradoxes arising from the idea of an omnipotent being, and paradoxes arising from the religious practice of prayer. So far, in

Education as Degrees and Certificates What is Undergraduate Education? K. P. Mohanan For many people, being educated means attending educational institutions and receiving certificates or degrees. This

Enrollment and Generated Credit Hours in Summer Session Courses Offered by the Department

College of Arts and Sciences Prepared by: Planning, Research, and Policy Analysis (PRPA) 438-8393 Page 1 Department of Chemistry Prepared by: Planning, Research, and Policy Analysis (PRPA) 438-8393 Page

Honours programme in Philosophy

Honours programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy offers students a broad and in-depth introduction to the main areas of Western philosophy and the philosophy

This excerpt is from Michael J. Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?, pp , by permission of the publisher.

124 JUSTICE This excerpt is from Michael J. Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?, pp. 124-129, by permission of the publisher. Questions for Kant Kant s moral philosophy is powerful and compelling.

The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment. Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College

Warkoski 1 The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College The study of ethics as a whole, particularly in regard to philosophy, is composed of many nuances,

Ethical Point of View

Ethical Point of View Virtually everybody shares core values Life ( hierarchy of needs security, health?) Happiness (privacy, freedom of expression?) Ability to accomplish goals (public education, property?)

Chapter 4 Legal Ethics

Chapter 4 Legal Ethics Yes. You read that right legal ethics. Har de har. Go ahead. Get it out of your system. How about this one? Why do scientists prefer using lawyers over lab rats? There are some things

CRITICAL THINKING: THE VERY BASICS - NARRATION Dona Warren, Philosophy Department, The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point

1 CRITICAL THINKING: THE VERY BASICS - NARRATION Dona Warren, Philosophy Department, The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Critical Thinking Hello and welcome to Critical Thinking, the Very Basics,

Definition 10. A proposition is a statement either true or false, but not both.

Chapter 2 Propositional Logic Contrariwise, continued Tweedledee, if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn t, it ain t. That s logic. (Lewis Carroll, Alice s Adventures

WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? ARGUMENTATIO N. Intro to Philosophy, Summer 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV

WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? ARGUMENTATIO N Intro to Philosophy, Summer 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV PHILOSOPHY CONSISTS IN CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT The philosophers we re reading have developed arguments to try to

The argument from evil

The argument from evil Our topic today is the argument from evil. This is by far the most important argument for the conclusion that God does not exist. The aim of at least the simplest form of this argument

Ad hominem: An argument directed at an opponent in a disagreement, not at the topic under discussion.

Glossary of Key Terms Ad hominem: An argument directed at an opponent in a disagreement, not at the topic under discussion. Agent: One who acts and is held responsible for those actions. Analytic judgment:

Midterm Examination 1 with Solutions - Math 574, Frank Thorne Thursday, February 9, 2012

Midterm Examination 1 with Solutions - Math 574, Frank Thorne (thorne@math.sc.edu) Thursday, February 9, 2012 1. (3 points each) For each sentence below, say whether it is logically equivalent to the sentence

Draft Copy: Do Not Cite Without Author s Permission

WHAT S WRONG WITH THE FUTURE OF VALUE ARGUMENT (1/8/2015) A. WHAT THE FUTURE OF VALUE ARGUMENT IS According to the future of value argument, what makes it wrong to kill those postnatal human beings we

CRITICAL THINKING: THE VERY BASICS - ANSWERS

1 CRITICAL THINKING: THE VERY BASICS - ANSWERS Dona Warren, Philosophy Department, The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Argument Recognition, Analysis, and Evaluation I ve highlighted important parts

More Glossary: Moral Nihilism Moral Skepticism Subjectivism:

Glossary: Moral Realism: There are universal moral truths even if we have yet to discover them Moral Pluralism : The theory that there are many moral systems Ethical Relativism : There is no universal

MILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.

MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility Mill s principle combines theories of the right

Ethics Handout 20 Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality

24.231 Ethics Handout 20 Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality General Question: How much does morality demand of us? And how far short of living up to those demands do most of us fall? Singer argues

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC A. Basic Concepts 1. Logic is the science of the correctness or incorrectness of reasoning, or the study of the evaluation of arguments. 2. A statement is a declarative sentence,

Three Ways to Clarify Your Writing

GENERAL WRITING ADVICE Three Ways to Clarify Your Writing Write as if your reader were lazy, stupid, and mean. Lazy: He or she will not take the trouble to figure out what you mean if it is not blazingly

A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 1. Meta-ethics. 2. Normative Ethics. 3. Applied Ethics

A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 1 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions

Professional Ethics PHIL 3340. Today s Topic Absolute Moral Rules & Kantian Ethics. Part I

Professional Ethics PHIL 3340 Today s Topic Absolute Moral Rules & Kantian Ethics Part I Consequentialism vs. Deontology Consequentialism: A type of ethical theory stating that to act morally we must base

Ethical Theories. A comparison of the three main branches of normative ethics

Ethical Theories A comparison of the three main branches of normative ethics Three main Ethical Approaches Three main approaches to normative ethics: Virtue ethics (ethics of character) Consequentialism

2. Argument Structure & Standardization

2. Argument Structure & Standardization 1 Some Review So, we have been looking at arguments: What is and is not an argument. The main parts of an argument. How to identify one when you see it. In the exercises

Practical Jealousy Management

Florida Poly Retreat 2006 Practical Jealousy Management Part 1: On the Nature of Jealousy Jealousy is an unusual emotion in that it is an emotion rooted in other emotions. Often, the root of jealousy lies

Read this syllabus very carefully. If there are any reasons why you cannot comply with what I am requiring, then talk with me about this at once.

LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING PHIL 2020 Maymester Term, 2010 Daily, 9:30-12:15 Peabody Hall, room 105 Text: LOGIC AND RATIONAL THOUGHT by Frank R. Harrison, III Professor: Frank R. Harrison, III Office:

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

1 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Exercises Identify the fallacies in the following passages. 1. If Satan existed then bad things would happen in the world. Bad things do happen in the

Descartes. Philosophy and Good Sense

Perspectives in Philosophy Rene Descartes Descartes Philosophy is the search for certainty the search to know, for yourself, what is really true and really false to know which beliefs are reliable. However,

323 GLOSSARY 359 INDEX

Contents in Brief PREFACE xiii CHAPTER 1 Arguments and Methodology 1 CHAPTER 2 Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction 16 CHAPTER 3 Our Philosophical Approaches 66 CHAPTER 4 Euthanasia 90 CHAPTER 5 Autonomy

How to write proofs: a quick guide

How to write proofs: a quick guide Eugenia Cheng Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago E-mail: eugenia@math.uchicago.edu Web: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/ eugenia October 2004 A proof is like

Anselm s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

Anselm s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God Anselm s argument is an a priori argument; that is, it is an argument that is independent of experience and based solely on concepts and logical relations,

Lecture 20 Popper s Deductive Method

Lecture 20 Popper s Deductive Method Patrick Maher Philosophy 270 Spring 2010 Karl Popper 1902: Born in Vienna. 1935: Logic of Scientific Discovery (in German). 1937 1945: Lecturer at Canterbury, New Zealand.

Knowledge empiricism

Michael Lacewing Knowledge empiricism The syllabus defines knowledge empiricism as the claim that all synthetic knowledge is a posteriori, while all a priori knowledge is (merely) analytic. This definition

A Brief Guide to Writing the Philosophy Paper

HARVARD COLLEGE Writing Center WRITING CENTER BRIEF GUIDE SERIES A Brief Guide to Writing the Philosophy Paper The Challenges of Philosophical Writing The aim of the assignments in your philosophy classes

Gödel s Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse

Gödel s Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse by Torkel Franzén Summary by Xavier Noria August 2006 fxn@hashref.com This unique exposition of Kurt Gödel s stunning incompleteness theorems for

Steps to Proving a Theorem

Steps to Proving a Theorem Step 1: Understand Goal What am I looking for? What should the last sentence in my proof say? What are some equivalent ways to state what I want? Are there any complicated definitions

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Winter, 2015/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into

General Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College. Lecture 3: Induction

General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 3: Induction Hume s s Fork 2 Enquiry IV starts with a vital distinction between types of proposition: Relations of ideas can be known a priori

Descartes Meditations. ? God exists I exist (as a thinking thing)

Descartes Meditations Descartes Structure of Belief What does he know with absolute certainty?? God exists I exist (as a thinking thing) Why try to prove God exists? Intellectual interest. : Are any of

The Toulmin Model: A tool for diagramming informal arguments. by Sergei Naumoff

The Toulmin Model: A tool for diagramming informal arguments by Sergei Naumoff Plan 1. Anticipating Sherlock Series 4 2. Basic elements of the Toulmin model 3. Practice of elements identification 4. Types

ST ANSELM S VERSION OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Anselm s argument relies on conceivability :

Michael Lacewing The ontological argument St Anselm and Descartes both famously presented an ontological argument for the existence of God. (The word ontological comes from ontology, the study of (-ology)

Lecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories

Lecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Introduction The subjective theory of probability holds that the laws of probability are laws that rational

Lecture 9 Maher on Inductive Probability

Lecture 9 Maher on Inductive Probability Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 Two concepts of probability Example You know that a coin is either two-headed or two-tailed but you have no information

This section demonstrates some different techniques of proving some general statements.

Section 4. Number Theory 4.. Introduction This section demonstrates some different techniques of proving some general statements. Examples: Prove that the sum of any two odd numbers is even. Firstly you

INTRODUCTION. The Seven Rules of. Highly Worried People

INTRODUCTION The Seven Rules of Highly Worried People WORRYING IS SECOND NATURE to you, but imagine that someone who has been raised in the jungle and knows nothing about conventional modern life approached

Some Basic Reasoning Skills. E.J. Coffman The University of Notre Dame

I. Introduction Some Basic Reasoning Skills E.J. Coffman The University of Notre Dame II. Finding Arguments III. Reconstructing an Argument A. Identify the Conclusion B. Identify Explicit Premises C. Add

What is the methodology for doing metaphysics?

PHIL 4603: Metaphysics Prof. Funkhouser What is Metaphysics? What is the subject matter of metaphysics? Metaphysics is the study of what exists (ontology) and the nature of things at the most abstract

The Problem of Evil not If God exists, she'd be OOG. If an OOG being exists, there would be no evil. God exists.

24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger September 14, 2005 The Problem of Evil Last time we considered the ontological argument for the existence of God. If the argument is cogent, then we

Lecture 2: Moral Reasoning & Evaluating Ethical Theories

Lecture 2: Moral Reasoning & Evaluating Ethical Theories I. Introduction In this ethics course, we are going to avoid divine command theory and various appeals to authority and put our trust in critical