Summary and Recommendations of the Academy s State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures
|
|
- Shannon Hodge
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Summary and Recommendations of the cademy s State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Laura. Miller, PhD, CP, Shawn Swanson, OTR/L BSTRCT The cademy s Ninth State of the Science Conference included a group of engineers, prosthetists, and therapists brought together to discuss upper limb prosthetic outcome measures. fter a presentation of the evidence based review and discussions on the history of the field and the various perspectives from the various professions, the panel reviewed those outcome measures found to be recommended and those thought to be worth consideration by the Evidence Based Review and the Upper Limb Prosthetics Outcome Measures Group. Outcome measures with the potential to address certain research questions are identified. Throughout the various discussions of the SSC group, a list was kept of commonly identified issues, questions, and missing links. From this list, the panel identified seven key research priority questions. These priority questions and items included in the discussions are presented. (J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:P83 P89.) KEY INDEXING TERMS: upper limb prostheses, outcome measures, prosthetics PERSPECTIVES ND HISTORY fter the presentation of Wright s evidence-based review (EBR), a history of the outcomes in upper limb pediatric prosthetics, and the work by the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (ULPOM) group, it was felt that conference questions 1, 2, and 3 (as listed in the Introduction to the State of Science [SSC]) were addressed. To understand better what various stakeholders want from an outcome measure, presentations were given from the following perspectives (Stubblefield, occupational therapy/research; Heckathorne, research; Lake and Uellendahl, prosthetics; Esquenazi, physician and prosthetic device user). The uniqueness and individual needs of the upper limb population was an overarching theme of all of the presentations. When considering any kind of outcome measure, and especially given this uniqueness, it is imperative to formulate the question to be asked before an outcome measure is selected. There was no one gold standard outcome measure identified that covered all related components and would work in all fields of application (i.e., research or patient care). During a review of the research literature, Heckathorne found that many people developing new prosthetic systems also designed a new measure. He noted that many of the LUR. MILLER, PhD, CP, is affiliated with the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Neural Engineering Center for rtificial Limbs, Chicago, Illinois, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. SHWN SWNSON, OTR/L, is affiliated with dvanced rm Dynamics, Redondo Beach, California. Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Copyright 2009 merican cademy of Orthotists and Prosthetists. Correspondence to: Laura. Miller, PhD, CP, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E Superior, Chicago, IL 60611; lamiller@ northwestern.edu measures would be more appropriately termed assessments (e.g., Fitt s law test, time to complete test, motion analysis, or virtual reality) rather than outcome measures. During this discussion, the various types of measures were reviewed: discriminative, predictive, and outcome. It was noted that research may fall more toward the discriminative or assessment side of the spectrum. Some of the questions discussed later (e.g., predicting usage prior to fitting) fall toward the predictive side of the spectrum. Heckathorne suggested that instead of creating new outcome measures (also referred to as tools in this text) to investigate a new product or device for the upper limb amputation population and validate it, it may be more effective and efficient to take the measures recommended by the group and break them down into subsections that would be applicable in the research setting. lthough the use of subsections of a measure compromises its validity, as a project progresses toward a clinical research study, the tasks and measurements used early in the research and development can then be integrated as all sections of the outcome measure are able to be used. Stubblefield also lamented the applicability or suitability of available measures in the research setting, commenting that often the time to complete a task is measured, but that might not be the best way to measure the quality of the control system and may not address or answer the question being asked. lso, the ability to control a prosthetic device will change in the context (e.g., opening a bag of cookies might be a lot more motivating than opening a bag of laundry). She reinforced the benefit of using the same tool in a research and clinic setting, so that it provides continuous useful information to all involved (therapist, engineer, and prosthetist). lso, as pointed out by Heckathorne, it is important to identify the research subject and the reference: a person with an upper limb amputation compared with a nonamputee, other amputees, or themselves. In some evalu- P83
2 Miller and Swanson ation situations, the subject may be a person without an upper limb amputation simulating an amputation. From the clinician perspective (Uellendahl, Lake, and Esquenazi), the uniqueness of the upper limb patient population was reviewed. For example, Uellendahl pointed out that few outcome measures address passive prosthetic use (for adults) or the impact of the device appearance. In addition, there is a benefit in knowing what individuals with different limb amputation levels choose to wear over time (from immediately postoperatively to many years later), and the device choice may change as the patient s perspective and needs change. Lake commented that measures that could help predict usage would be beneficial (predictive measures). Both Uellendahl and Lake stressed that the user has the most important perspective, and various goals of the user will determine what the most appropriate device would be to reach those goals. To address this aspect, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Goal ttainment Scale (GS) were discussed. It was suggested that both of these measures would facilitate focusing on the personal factors of prosthetic usage and successful goal attainment but would likely not be used independent of standard item outcome measures. It was also noted that currently there are no adequate training materials or time available for the prosthetist to apply the COPM or GS outcome measure in a clinical setting. Esquenazi reviewed many of the reasons that individuals with upper limb loss may not use a prosthesis including, but not limited to, lack of shoulder mobility, lack of occupational therapy training, financial concerns, and an unnatural appearance. He discussed that a large number of individuals may eventually develop overuse injures of the contralateral side whether they use a prosthesis or not. This warrants further investigation as it may influence the recommendations of the physician to prescribe a prosthesis and occupational therapy training in an attempt to address the impact on future health care and to help justify the use of prosthetic devices to users and insurers. WHT TOOLS RE VILBLE ND WHEN THEY COULD BE USED One recommendation of the ULPOM group was to build a toolkit of validated procedures for the entire development cycle to be developed and promoted within the appropriate professions. 1 Work by the ULPOM group was started before the SSC in which they classified identified measures into three categories: accept, consider, reject. 1 t the SSC meeting, the terminology was revised to better describe the categories: recommended, to consider, and excluded. fter the specific perspectives presentations in the SSC meeting, the notes from the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) 2007 breakout groups were reviewed to address the fourth SSC question. These discussions identified what the various breakout groups at ISPO (adult, pediatric, and technical) wanted to be able obtain from SSC Proceedings an outcome measure. From these notes and the SSC discussion, a list of example questions across a range of evaluation topics (Table 1) was prepared. s a group, appropriate tools for each question were identified and categorized according to the field of application (research or patient care). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-related component under the evaluation was also identified for each measure. During this process, the group adopted and modified terminology used by the ULPOM group for evaluating tools as clinically useful or research useful or both. Specifically, we needed to identify what research meant to our SSC group, because it is a broad term that covers measurement along the spectrum from product development through commercialization into the clinic and ending in long-term or longitudinal or community use. To best classify the available tools and how they might be used, the SSC group identified three fields of application with the assumption that all the three would use human subjects, rather than bench-top testing of hardware. Research was expanded into two fields: 1) development research, identifying the time when componentry and controls might be early prototypes and used in the laboratory; and 2) clinical research, identifying the transition to a clinical environment or an in-depth investigation to test a certain intervention. The third field, patient care, relates to the assessments that are conducted in everyday patient interaction or clinical care settings. fter identifying the general questions, the tools that were recommended in the EBR and by the ULPOM group were reviewed to see which, if any, would directly answer the identified questions in the field of application category. It is important to note that this is only a general summary, and it would still be necessary to make sure that the measures listed were appropriate to answer the specific question. The results of this discussion can be found in Table 1. There were some questions that were not easily addressed with the existing toolkit of recommended measures, including the global value of the upper limb prosthesis to the individual, which may be more suitably addressed by qualitative methodologies, and the effect of the prosthesis on mental load. Three questions were determined to only be answerable with longitudinal studies using existing measures: 1) what provides evidence to support prosthetic clinical recommendations? ; 2) how can we compare one upper limb prosthetic device to another? which would depend on the tools demonstrating sufficient sensitivity; and 3) does the tool measure change over time (longitudinal outcomes)? which would be dependent on the tools lacking ceiling or floor effects over the period of time in question. s Table 1 was completed, there were noticeable gaps, especially in the development end of the spectrum. Therefore, the tools listed as consider by the ULPOM group were evaluated by the SSC group to see what field of application would be addressed. Tools were organized into three groups: 1) emerging, tools under active development; 2) promising, tools with only minor work needed to confirm if they should be listed as rec- P84
3 SSC Proceedings Outcome Measures in Upper Limb Prosthetics Table 1. Example research questions and the recommended measures Question to be addressed Field of application research ICF-related component Development Clinical Patient care What is the client s capacity to operate the upper limb prosthesis? (competency) CMC* ƒ (myo only) Function and ctivity P, P, P, How well does the individual use their upper limb prosthesis in DL s? (performance) PUFI* ƒ ctivity P P GS ƒ ctivity and Participation P, P, Is the upper limb prosthesis useful to the individual for specific tasks? COPM ƒ (satisfaction with performance N/ (related to QoL) P, P, scale) PUFI* ƒ ctivity P P How can we measure the functional effectiveness of prosthetic treatment/ occupational therapy? bilhand Kids* ctivity and Participation P P CMC* ƒ Function and ctivity P, P, P, H* Function and ctivity P GS ƒ ctivity and Participation P, P, PODCI ƒ ctivity and Participation P P PUFI* ƒ ctivity P P Does the tool address individuals of higher level complexity? H* Function and ctivity P GS ƒ ctivity and Participation P, P, Does the tool address individuals with bilateral upper limb involvement? GS ƒ ctivity and Participation P, P, How do we assess function for an individual with upper limb loss/deficiency not using a prosthesis? H* Function and ctivity P GS ƒ ctivity and Participation P, P, How do we assess quality of life for an individual with upper limb loss/deficiency? Disabkids ƒ N/ (related to QoL) P P PedsQL ƒ N/ (related to QoL) P WHOQOL ƒ N/ (related to QoL) *From EBR report. ƒ From ULPOM report. * ƒ From EBR & ULPOM reports. ppropriate measures for each question were then discussed to determine the ICF-related component and the field of application. P, pediatric population;, adult population; ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. P85
4 Miller and Swanson ommended ; 3) potential, tools that require significant work to develop and validate for use as recommended. The tools in the promising and potential groups were also discussed to determine whether any showed specific benefit, either for answering questions in areas that are lacking applicable tools (e.g., Jebsen-Taylor, Southampton Hand ssessment Procedure [SHP], and Box and Blocks for the research development stage) or for that are very close to application, with very specific work needed to make the tool appropriate for application (e.g., ssisting Hand ssessment [H]-prosthetics is popular in Sweden in pediatric applications but has never been validated, though work is in progress). The results of this discussion can be found in Table 2. SSC Proceedings IDENTIFICTION OF RESERCH PRIORITY QUESTIONS Throughout the various discussions, a list was kept of commonly identified issues, questions, and missing links. pproximately, 20 points were listed. fter much discussion about these needs, seven key research priority questions were identified that collectively covered the specific points: 1. How should outcome measures be disseminated to the various stakeholders along the continuum? That is, what are the best methods to enable all of the stakeholders to use outcome measures on a routine basis? 2. What are appropriate and recommended measures that can be identified across the continuum from research and development through community integration and across all the ICF-related components? 3. How can we leverage multidisciplinary, multicenter, longitudinal, and collective studies to answer the interest questions of the various stakeholders? 4. What measures are sensitive enough to evaluate acceptance and rejection of prosthetic devices? 5. How does the team approach influence upper limb prosthetic outcomes? (multidisciplinary, experience, specialty groups or specialized training, and complexity of the case [bilateral and/or higher levels of amputation, other comorbidities, etc]). 6. What are the contributing factors to overuse injury in upper limb deficiency and is there a difference in injury incidence and severity for those who do or do not use an upper limb prosthesis? 7. How are overall clinical upper limb outcomes related to individualized interventions or decisions? The group was unanimous in their recommendation that research priority question 1 was the most important to emphasize at this state. Many outcome measures exist, but overall, they are not being applied, especially in a clinical setting. New tools are being developed and it will be necessary to disseminate information about these new measures as they become available. Decisions need to be made regarding who is going to administer the various tests and how they should be administered. The time and equipment needed to administer, and score the tests also needs to be considered. One key limitation to application that was discussed was the lack of available training for the various assessments. For example, the COPM and GS seemed to be able to address many aspects of care that prosthetists would like to know. However, these are both occupational therapy tools, and there are not applicable training documents available for the prosthetics community. Because of the individuality of goals, it would also be difficult to compare individual s abilities using these measures on their own. It was suggested that a library or menu of individualized goals and achievement levels could be developed to make longitudinal studies more feasible using this tool (e.g., goals related to dressing, feeding, self-care, work, sports, leisure). greement was reached by the group regarding the identification of the ssessment for Capacity of Myoelectric Control (CMC), a measure that is, currently, aimed at the Occupational Therapy (OT) community, to be one of the measures with the most potential for two of the questions identified in Table 1, although certification is required to use it and training is now done in a labor-intensive small group basis (i.e., one expert trainer with groups of ten clinicians), limiting the opportunities for widespread sharing of this measure. Facilitating web-based training modules may make this and other measures more accessible to the general public. Timely and well-targeted dissemination of the results of this meeting was also suggested as a way to make the various stakeholders aware of the recommendations of the SSC group and thus help further future longitudinal studies. In addition to presentations at national and international meetings, it was suggested that education of clinical professionals (prosthetists, occupational therapists, and physical therapists) earlier in their careers (e.g., as students) may have a significant positive influence on the acceptance of the tools in the future. Research priority question 2 addresses the gaps in our toolkit. For example, the development component of the research column has very few appropriate tools to address the questions in Table 1. One of the suggested methods to address this research or development area was to evaluate the activity tools and see what elements could be used in a research setting. It was also noted that there are few tests for adults in the ICF domain of function. Other gaps included the lack of validated functional measures for higher complexity level amputees, bilateral amputees, or body-powered users. Currently, existing measures can at best evaluate one arm at a time or are limited to assessment of only the prosthetic hand. None of the existing measures evaluate the mental load associated with prosthetic use (i.e., how much focus must be given to control the device). It was also concluded that to evaluate the global value of the device, it may be necessary to also incorporate the use of qualitative evaluation methodologies. For some of the other missing links (e.g., satisfaction, etc), lower limb measures may be able to be modified to fit the upper limb case. 2 Long-term care and evaluation was the focus of research priority question 3, specifically the need to organize and fund multidisciplinary, multicenter, longitudinal, and collective studies. Multicenter collective studies would provide larger numbers to permit a more thorough and generalizable examination that P86
5 SSC Proceedings Outcome Measures in Upper Limb Prosthetics Table 2. Measures for consideration Tools for consideration General comments and work needed Field of application research ICF-related component Development Clinical Patient care Emerging tests CHEQ OPUS UFI Promising tests H - prosthetics Box and Blocks CPP-PSI DSH Jebsen Taylor SHP Sollerman Potential tests PUFI- TPES Fills the need for a self-report for children without a prosthesis. Demo version online. Fills the need for a questionnaire of participation for adults. The UL module has been published in English, but has only been validated in Slovenia. Swedish validation in progress. Fills the need for a questionnaire of performance of activity for children without a prosthesis. To be released in June Fills the need for an observational tool for adults and children. Work in progress on validation (adult and two children versions). research setting. Validation work for prosthetic application needed. Fills the satisfaction gap in pediatric. Validation work needed. Fills the need for self-report in adults. Validation work for prosthetic application needed as well as modification to instructions. research setting. Validation work for prosthetic application needed. research setting. Validation work needed. Designed specifically for use with prosthetic hands. research setting. Validation work for prosthetic application needed. Fills the need for an adult self-report functional test. Item development and validation work needed. Fills the need for measuring psychosocial component. Item development and validation work needed. Function, ctivity and Participation ctivity and Participation ctivity P P Function and ctivity P P, Function P, P, N/ (related to QoL) P P Function, ctivity and Participation Function Function Function P*, P*, ctivity ctivity and Participation UBET Validation work needed. Function and ctivity P P UNB Validation work needed. Could meet the need for an adult observational tool (item development and validation work needed). Function and ctivity P, P, Funding priority needs. *Not quite ready for use in children. These measures were divided into three groups: emerging, promising, and potential. Each measure was discussed to determine the ICF-related component and the field of application. Measures thought to hold promise, either for answering questions in areas that are lacking applicable measures or those with very specific work needed, are marked by a star. P, pediatric population;, adult population; ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. P P87
6 Miller and Swanson would provide evidence that meets the evidence needs of multiple stakeholders. In particular, a need was expressed for longitudinal studies comparing various devices over time. This necessitates the use of a strong set of validated outcome measures that cover the various ICF-related components. It was also believed that the use of longitudinal studies may help us to predict the impact of the prosthesis and associated rehabilitation on long-term functional success and device acceptance and the incidence of related overuse issues. With respect to longitudinal studies, research needs to be done to determine which measures are sensitive enough to evaluate the ultimate acceptance and rejection of prosthetic designs (research priority question 4). These evaluations may include a focus many of the same issues that were identified in research priority question 3 (e.g., long-term acceptance) and also consider the physical load or effort, such as energy expenditure, heat, weight, and socket comfort. Research priority question 4 may also relate to the evaluation of the patient education practices as reflected in options and goals. If this information is given at a time when it is not of priority to the user, i.e., provided too early in the prosthetic rehabilitation program, it may be forgotten or overlooked, reducing its potential impact on the outcome. The study by Biddiss and Chau 3 provides suggestions on appropriate areas of investigation related to research priority question 4. nother common topic of discussion among the group was the need for team approach when fitting and training persons with upper-limb prostheses (research priority question 5). It was noted that there has been little study of how the team approach influences outcomes. Longitudinal studies in this area could evaluate the effect of the multidisciplinary team on outcomes, the effect of clinician experience on the success of fitting, the effect of a specialty designation group or specialty training on the fitting, and the effect of the complexity of the case on the outcome. Many aspects of care could be evaluated as part of the team approach including component selection, patient education, and client satisfaction. s a follow-up to a recent publication in the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 4 more work needs to be done to investigate the contributing factors to overuse injury in upper limb deficiency (research priority question 6). In addition to evaluating if there is a difference in injury rates and severity for those who do or do not use an upper limb prosthesis, it is important to know if there are other factors that are associated with injury (type of device used, vocational activities, recreational activities, other physical involvement, etc). The group also recognized the need to be able to relate overall clinical upper limb outcomes to individualized interventions or decisions (research priority question 7). That is, we need better ways to go from outcome measure results to specific recommendations for caring for a particular client, which is a limitation of the existing standard item measures but of great importance. This brought the discussion back to SSC Proceedings the potential of individualized measures such as the COPM or GS as indictors of outcome. SUMMRY ND CONCLUSIONS One question from the readership of the cademy publications (i.e., prosthetic clinicians) may be How should I interpret this work to influence my clinical practice and what tools should I start using now? Even with the significant amount of work done to evaluate various outcome measures, there are few tools that can be recommended for the clinical prosthetist to integrate immediately into a clinical care setting. There are many measures that show promise for application into the clinical prosthetics setting soon, either tools that require slightly more work or the development of educational materials for the prosthetist to make them available for use. Measures at the body function level may be ones that most directly relate to the work done by a clinical prosthetist. For most of these measures, we still need more information on their reliability and validity when used in prosthetics. t the activity level, the COPM and GS allow individualized goal setting, ideal for a clinical setting; however, prosthetistspecific training does not currently exist. nother primary concern of the clinical prosthetist is satisfaction and use or acceptance. Surveys are ideal for this application, and it is recommended that prosthetic companies use existing, validated measures (such as the upper limb module of the Orthotics and prosthetics user survey, which is under refinement), perhaps supplemented by an additional page of additional information required for specific business purposes, rather than developing entire new surveys. There may be many other outcome topics (e.g., specific functional assessment) that the prosthetist may wish to address, although many of the identified tools that link with these areas have been traditionally administered by therapists. lthough prosthetist should certainly become more involved in the application and work on outcome measures, it is hoped that future work will be done as part of a team approach to permit use of measures that reflect the breadth of the ICF outcome areas and, as discussed in this report, will be facilitated by education initiatives for all interested clinical team members on these use of the tools. This State of the Science document contains the summary of significant work in outcomes that has been conducted in upper limb prosthetics. The work that was accomplished at the State of the Science meeting could not have been completed without the evidence-based report prepared by Wright or the work that was done independent of Wright by the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Group. From this background work, the SSC group has selected and recommended a list of tools potentially applicable for various questions (Table 1) as well as other measures that in the future may be more fully developed for recommendation across the spectrum from research and development through home use (Table 2). s previously stated, we P88
7 SSC Proceedings use the word potentially because it is necessary to formulate the question before confirming whether an outcome measure is truly appropriate. key outcome of the SSC meeting was the identification of seven specific research priorities. The most important of these is the need to facilitate the implementation of the existing recommended measures into the prosthetics community (including prosthetists, therapists, physicians, and engineers). The group plans to widely disseminate this information so that instead of continuing to discuss why outcomes are not more widely used, there will be resources developed for training and eventually data will be collected from longitudinal and multicenter studies that advance the field. Outcome Measures in Upper Limb Prosthetics REFERENCES 1. Hill W, Stavdahl O, Hermansson LN, et al. Functional Outcomes in the WHO-ICF Model: establishment of the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Group. J Prosthet Orthot 2009;21: Bilodeau S, Hebert R, Desrosiers J. Lower limb prosthesis utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000;24: Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. m J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86: Gambrell C. Overuse syndrome and the unilateral upper limb amputee: consequences and prevention. J Prosthet Orthot 2008; 20: Something New! Two JPO articles have quizzes worth 2 PCE credits each. One is in this issue...and both can be found online at P89
Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy About the Amputee Coalition The Amputee Coalition is a donor-supported, voluntary health organization serving the nearly two million people with limb loss and more than 28 million
More informationOccupational Therapy and Upper Limb Amputee Rehabilitation: Occupational Focused Intervention. Matthew Sproats (BaAppSc OT)
Occupational Therapy and Upper Limb Amputee Rehabilitation: Occupational Focused Intervention Matthew Sproats (BaAppSc OT) Declaration of Conflict The author and co authors declare no conflict of interest
More informationAmputation Rehabilitation Center
Amputation Rehabilitation Center AT MossRehab Since 1959, MossRehab has provided our patients with a breadth of clinical expertise unrivaled in the region. Within our extensive system you ll find: Experienced
More informationWhen these professionals work in sync, however, the synergy created works magic for the patient.
OPBN EXCLUSIVES O&P Synergy: Join Forces With Physical, Occupational Therapy In the second installment of this series, O&P Business News explores the benefits and challenges of working with physical and
More informationUniversity Rehabilitation Institute Republic of Slovenia. Helena Burger, Metka Teržan University Rehabilitation Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
University Rehabilitation Institute Republic of Slovenia Helena Burger, Metka Teržan University Rehabilitation Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 3 Introduction * Primary level PT only * Secondary level:
More informationHow To Control A Prosthetic Leg
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY OUTCOMES WITH TARGETED HYPER- REINNERVATION NERVE TRANSFER SURGERY : TWO CASE STUDIES Stubblefield, K.A., 1,2 Milller, L.A., 1,3 Lipschutz, R.D., 1,3 Phillips, M.E., 1,2 Heckathorne,
More informationCURRICULUM VITAE. Mark Stephen Hopkins PT, CPO, MBA CEO and President, Dankmeyer, Inc.
CURRICULUM VITAE Mark Stephen Hopkins PT, CPO, MBA CEO and President, Dankmeyer, Inc. Date May 19, 2014 Adjunct Faculty, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Department of Physical Therapy
More informationDEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY TEL: 886-6-235-3535 EXT.5026 E-MAIL: em75025@email.ncku.edu.tw CHAIRPERSON: Kuo, Li-Chieh BRIEF INTRODUCTION
DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY TEL: 886-6-25-55 EXT.5026 E-MAIL: em75025@email.ncku.edu.tw CHAIRPERSON: Kuo, Li-Chieh BRIEF INTRODUCTION Occupational therapy assists people of all ages with disabilities
More informationJay Pyo, D.O. January 30, 2015
Jay Pyo, D.O. January 30, 2015 Medical Director,Polytrauma Amputation Network Site (PANS) Assistant Chief,Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service VA San Diego Healthcare System Objectives Scope of
More informationA review of employment patterns of industrial amputees factors influencing rehabilitation
Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 1985, 9, 69-78 A review of employment patterns of industrial amputees factors influencing rehabilitation S. MILLSTEIN, D. BAIN and G. A. HUNTER* Amputee Clinic,
More informationRestorative Care. Policy, Procedures and Training Package
Restorative Care Policy, Procedures and Training Package Release Date: December 17, 2010 Disclaimer The Ontario Association of Non-Profit Homes and Services for Seniors (OANHSS) Long-Term Care Homes Act
More informationANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST LICENSURE S.B. 921 (S-2): ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE Senate Bill 921 (Substitute S-2 as reported) Sponsor: Senator Roger Kahn, M.D. Committee: Health Policy Date Completed:
More informationProvincial Rehabilitation Unit. Patient Handbook
Provincial Rehabilitation Unit Patient Handbook ONE ISLAND FUTURE ONE ISLAND HEALTH SYSTEM Welcome to Unit 7, the Provincial Rehabilitation Unit. This specialized 20 bed unit is staffed by an interdisciplinary
More informationWorkplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB)
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Dr. L. Grbac March 25, 2013 1 ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT RESOURCES Programs of Care Specialty Clinics Low Back Expert Physician Examiner Assessments Regional Evaluation
More informationStrategy for Direct Access. Naima Saleh United Arab Emirates
Strategy for Direct Access Naima Saleh United Arab Emirates Dubai During 1950 Dubai 1960s-1970s After Development Healthcare System UAE Ministry of Health (MOH) Federal Government of Health Care Constitution
More informationExternal Field Review Results for the Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Monitoring System
External Field Review Results for the Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Monitoring System July 2012 Acknowledgements The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) wishes to acknowledge and thank the
More informationEvidence-Based Practice: Concepts and Controversies
Evidence-Based Practice: Concepts and Controversies Mary Law, Ph.D., OT CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability School of Rehabilitation Science McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada CanChild Centre for
More informationReferral for Limb Fitting Information for your first visit to Queen Mary s Hospital, Douglas Bader Rehab Centre
Referral for Limb Fitting Information for your first visit to Queen Mary s Hospital, Douglas Bader Rehab Centre Draft version 23/3/2011 Review date March 2014 This booklet is designed to provide you with
More informationHUSSON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY MSOT PROGRAM COURSE DESCRIPTIONS APPLICABLE TO FALL 2014
HUSSON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY MSOT PROGRAM COURSE DESCRIPTIONS APPLICABLE TO FALL 2014 BA 310 Organization and Management This course focuses on how to design organization systems and
More informationMeasuring & Promoting Participation of Children & Youth with ABI. Gary Bedell, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA Department of Occupational Therapy
Measuring & Promoting Participation of Children & Youth with ABI Gary Bedell, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA Department of Occupational Therapy My Experience Occupational Therapy Interdisciplinary teams Measurement
More informationP A T H W A Y S T O A. Career in. Sports Medicine
P A T H W A Y S T O A Career in Sports Medicine P A T H W A Y S T O A Career in Sports Medicine What is sports medicine? Sports medicine is not a single career, but instead a widely varied group of professionals
More informationProfile: Kessler Patients
Profile: Kessler Patients 65 Breakthrough Years Kessler Institute has pioneered the course of medical rehabilitation since 1948. Today, as the nation s largest single rehabilitation hospital, we continue
More informationWhat you need to know about...
What you need to know about... May 2010 PharmaCare Prosthetic Benefits: Application for Financial Assistance (Health Form #5402) General Instructions Health care providers must apply for pre-approval for
More informationBASIC CONCEPTS OF PATIENT EDUCATION
Section I BASIC CONCEPTS OF PATIENT EDUCATION Section I of this book, Basic Concepts of Patient Education, describes the importance of teaching and learning in health care and physical and occupational
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST BAY. First Quarter/Year of Modification FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST BAY First Quarter/Year of Modification FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Quarter: FALL Year: 2013 NO DECISION NEEDED. Date Submitted to APGS: 11-22-11 Catalog: 2013-2014 REQUEST FOR
More informationHow To Cover Occupational Therapy
Guidelines for Medical Necessity Determination for Occupational Therapy These Guidelines for Medical Necessity Determination (Guidelines) identify the clinical information MassHealth needs to determine
More informationHANGER RESIDENCY PROGRAM
HANGER RESIDENCY PROGRAM Primary Training Center Biography Charlotte NC WE ARE COMPREHENSIVE ACADEMICALLY BASED PROFESSIONAL STATE OF THE ART INDUSTRY LEADERS HANGER RESIDENTS Hanger Residency Program
More informationHealth Care Job Information Sheet #4 General Therapies
Health Care Job Information Sheet #4 General Therapies A. Occupations 1) Physiotherapist 2) Physiotherapist Assistant/ Occupational Therapist Assistant 3) Occupational Therapist 4) Athletic Therapist 5)
More informationSCOPE OF PRACTICE. Statement of Purpose The purpose of this document is to define the scope of practice in occupational therapy in order to
SCOPE OF PRACTICE Statement of Purpose The purpose of this document is to define the scope of practice in occupational therapy in order to 1. delineate the domain of occupational therapy practice that
More informationSecond Year Fall. Spring
Occupational Therapy Program Curriculum (3+3 Students = OTFY courses; first year only.) Please note, course descriptions are updated periodically. First Year Fall Credits GMOT 6110/OTFY 4110 Functional
More informationEngagement Rubric for Applicants
Engagement Rubric for Applicants Updated: June 6, 2016 Published: February 4, 2014 To cite this document, please use: PCORI Engagement Rubric. PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) website.
More informationWork Conditioning Natural Progressions By Nancy Botting, Judy Braun, Charlene Couture and Liz Scott
Work Conditioning Natural Progressions By Nancy Botting, Judy Braun, Charlene Couture and Liz Scott How a non-traditional, geared-to-work treatment is returning injured workers to full duties quickly,
More informationREHABILITATION. begins right here
REHABILITATION begins right here Select Rehabilitation Hospital of Denton offers you a new direction in medical rehabilitation. Our 44-bed, state-of-the-science hospital offers unparalleled treatment to
More informationOccupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy I. Policy University Health Alliance (UHA) will reimburse for occupational therapy when it is determined to be medically necessary and when it meets the medical criteria guidelines
More informationMay 7, 2012. Submitted Electronically
May 7, 2012 Submitted Electronically Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Department of Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Attention: 2014 edition EHR
More informationComparison of Research Designs Template
Comparison of Comparison of The following seven tables provide an annotated template to guide you through the comparison of research designs assignment in this course. These tables help you organize your
More informationCOE Guidelines for an Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Experience - Level II
COE Guidelines for an Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Experience - Level II History and Purpose The intent of this document is to describe the desired characteristics of a fieldwork placement for occupational
More informationWhat is Home Care? Printed in USA Arcadia Home Care & Staffing www.arcadiahomecare.com
Printed in USA Arcadia Home Care & Staffing www.arcadiahomecare.com Home Care: What does it mean to you? For some people it may mean having only occasional help with the laundry, grocery shopping, or simple
More informationDuring military mission in Afghanistan injured Estonian soldiers rehabilitation
During military mission in Afghanistan injured Estonian soldiers rehabilitation Annelii Nikitina (Physiatrist) Triin Rohumäe (Physiotherapist) East-Tallinn Central Hospital Birth of military rehab in Estonia
More informationMount Sinai Rehabilitation Center. 2014 Outcomes. Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Center 2014 Outcomes
Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Center 2014 Outcomes Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Center 2014 Outcomes TABLE OF CONTENTS A Message from the Chair... 3 About Our Programs. 4-5 Inpatient Rehabilitation. 6-12 Outpatient
More informationBrown Hills College of Engineering & Technology Machine Design - 1. UNIT 1 D e s i g n P h i l o s o p h y
UNIT 1 D e s i g n P h i l o s o p h y Problem Identification- Problem Statement, Specifications, Constraints, Feasibility Study-Technical Feasibility, Economic & Financial Feasibility, Social & Environmental
More informationRehabilitation and Choosing a Rehab Center
The following excerpt has been taken from the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation Paralysis Resource Center website. http://www.christopherreeve.org/site/c.mtkzkgmwkwg/b.4453457/k.a4cb/overview How_to_Pick_a_Rehab.htm
More information2016 VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS
2016 VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS Contents Comprehensive Blind Rehabilitation Services (CBRS)... 2 Outpatient Low Vision and Blind Rehabilitation Services for Veterans and Active
More informationKINESIOLOGY. What can I do with this major? Specialized studios, e.g. yoga, pilates. Camps and park districts
PHYSICAL FITNESS Exercise Physiology Personal Training Performance Enhancement and Management Strength and Conditioning Coaching Group Fitness Instruction Health Club or Fitness Center Management KINESIOLOGY
More informationRelated Service providers in Transition
Related Service providers in Transition A Webinar by the: National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center NSTTAC Presenters Moderator: Laurie Ray, MPT, PhD >laurie_ray@med.unc.edu (NC) Physical
More informationHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS SUMMARY ANALYSIS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/HB 639 FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: SPONSOR(S): Health Quality Subcommittee; Harrell and others 117 Y s 0 N s COMPANION BILLS: (SB 604) GOVERNOR S ACTION:
More informationOccupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Policy Number: Original Effective Date: MM.09.003 07/15/2003 Line(s) of Business: Current Effective Date: HMO; PPO; EUTF; HSTA; QUEST; Federal Plan 87 02/01/2012 Line(s) of Business
More informationMarianjoy Physical Therapy and. A Leader in Rehabilitation
Marianjoy Physical Therapy and Outpatient Services A Leader in Rehabilitation Choose Wisely Choose Marianjoy Marianjoy Distinctly Different Marianjoy provides a complete range of rehabilitation services
More informationPediatric Outpatient Rehabilitation Services
Pediatric Outpatient Rehabilitation Services Northwestern Medicine Pediatric Rehabilitation As a parent, you want your child to lead a full and satisfying life at home and in school. The goal of Pediatric
More informationHow To Understand The Barriers And Facilitators To The Effective Use Of An Ehr
Barriers and Facilitators to the Effective Use of Electronic Health Records A case study of barriers and facilitators to the effective use of the electronic health records as measured by providers ability
More informationIII. FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE)
III. FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) Understanding what the law requires in terms of providing a free appropriate public education to students with disabilities is central to understanding the
More informationRehabilitation and Choosing a Rehab Center
The following excerpt has been taken from the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation Paralysis Resource Center website. http://www.christopherreeve.org/site/c.mtkzkgmwkwg/b.4453457/k.a4cb/overview How_to_Pick_a_Rehab.htm
More informationCore Competencies for Public Health Professionals
Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals Revisions Adopted: May 2010 Available from: http://www.phf.org/programs/corecompetencies A collaborative activity of the Centers for Disease Control and
More informationExercise is Medicine Australia Education evaluation summary
Exercise is Medicine Australia Education evaluation summary Exercise is Medicine Australia (EIM Australia) seeks to support health care providers to become consistently effective in counselling and referring
More informationA Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Workshop for Social Workers and Helping Professionals Experiencing Burnout: A Grant Proposal
A Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Workshop for Social Workers and Helping Professionals Experiencing Burnout: A Grant Proposal Evelyn C. Howe California State University, Long Beach May 2015 Introduction
More informationReturn to work after lower limb amputation K. Fisher *, R.S. Hanspal and L. Marks
Brief research report 51 Return to work after lower limb amputation K. Fisher *, R.S. Hanspal and L. Marks This study investigated the proportion of patients who returned to work following amputation and
More informationAT Outcomes Measurement
AT Outcomes Measurement Assistive Technology Quick Reference Series Accountability and cost-benefit analysis have become common topics of discussion throughout business and industry. The importance of
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Q) How do I control a bebionic hand? A) Bebionic is a myoelectric system with an advanced, multiarticulating, state of the art compliant hand as a terminal device. Typical systems
More information2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY
Measure #218 (NQF 0423): Functional Deficit: Change in Risk-Adjusted Functional Status for Patients with Hip Impairments National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination 2016 PQRS
More informationSection 4: Key Informant Interviews
UCLA CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH Section 4: Key Informant Interviews Purpose Key informant interviews are qualitative in-depth interviews with people who know what is going on in the community. The
More informationEvaluation: Designs and Approaches
Evaluation: Designs and Approaches Publication Year: 2004 The choice of a design for an outcome evaluation is often influenced by the need to compromise between cost and certainty. Generally, the more
More informationInjury Survey 2008. Commissioned by. Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch Centre for Health Protection Department of Health.
Injury Survey 2008 Commissioned by Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch Centre for Health Protection Department of Health September 2010 Copyright of this survey report is held by the Department of Health
More informationILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST 29900 OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST PROGRAM COORDINATOR 29908
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION CLASS TITLE POSITION CODE OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST 29900 OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST PROGRAM COORDINATOR 29908 INTRODUCTION: Effective: 10-16-96
More informationGuideline on the Controlled Acts and Delegation
Guideline on the Controlled Acts and Delegation C o l l e g e o f O c c u p a t i o n a l T h e r a p i s t s o f O n t a r i o June 2000 Introduction The College receives numerous practice calls seeking
More informationGood Samaritan Inpatient Rehabilitation Program
Good Samaritan Inpatient Rehabilitation Program Living at your full potential. Welcome When people are sick or injured, our goal is their maximum recovery. We help people live to their full potential.
More informationE. Intervention The focus of direct practice intervention is derived from the social study and assessment and is sanctioned by the contract. Implement
Narrative Outline I. Generalist Practice: A Definition Generalist practice is both a process and a method which seeks to improve, restore, maintain, or enhance the client's social functioning. Although
More informationOCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSISTANT CURRICULUM DESIGN
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSISTANT CURRICULUM DESIGN The design of the content, scope, and course sequencing for the Occupational Therapy Assistant ( OTA ) curriculum combines the mission of the OTA program,
More informationTESTIMONY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. Laura Cohen PT, PhD, ATP
TESTIMONY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE Laura Cohen PT, PhD, ATP Physical Therapist and Assistive Technology Practitioner Consultant Tucson, AZ April 28, 2004 1 Chairman Grassley
More informationWorkflow and Process Analysis for CCC
Section 3.6 Design Workflow and Process Analysis for CCC This tool introduces the importance of workflow and process improvement in a community-based care coordination (CCC) program, describes the value
More informationCENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN REHABILITATION SERVICES. Policies Standards Survey Process
CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN REHABILITATION SERVICES Policies Standards Survey Process INTRODUCTION The CIHQ Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Services program recognizes specialized inpatient rehabilitation
More informationPatient s Handbook. Provincial Rehabilitation Unit ONE ISLAND HEALTH SYSTEM ONE ISLAND FUTURE 11HPE41-30364
Patient s Handbook Provincial Rehabilitation Unit ONE ISLAND FUTURE ONE ISLAND HEALTH SYSTEM 11HPE41-30364 REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT USED ON UNIT 7 During a patient s stay on Unit 7, various pieces of
More informationUsing Public Health Evaluation Models to Assess Health IT Implementations
Using Public Health Evaluation Models to Assess Health IT Implementations September 2011 White Paper Prepared for Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society 33 West Monroe Street Suite 1700
More informationCombined Assessment Program Summary Report. Evaluation of Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management at Veterans Health Administration Facilities
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Report No. 14-05132-90 Office of Healthcare Inspections Combined Assessment Program Summary Report Evaluation of Pressure Ulcer Prevention and
More informationHow To Care For A Disabled Person
Henry Ford Macomb Hospitals Inpatient Rehabilitation Patient and Family Handbook Welcome At Henry Ford Macomb Hospitals, our goal is to help you become as independent as possible while achieving your
More informationAnnie O'Connor MSPT, OCS, Cert. MDT
Annie O'Connor MSPT, OCS, Cert. MDT 541 N. Elmwood #2, Oak Park, IL. 60302 Mobile: 708-921-3352 / Fax: 708-427-3651 aoconnor@ric.org Education / Certifications: 1993 (9 week) Orthopedic Physical Therapy
More informationRelated Services: How Do Special Needs Education Relate to Your Child?
Related Services: How Do Special Needs Education Relate to Your Child? Family Driven Non-Profit 501(c)3 What makes FND unique is that the majority of our Board of Directors, all of our Management Staff
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY VISION International leadership in education and research in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science.
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY VISION International leadership in education and research in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science. DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY MISSION To educate future and current
More informationIntroduction to Business Planning
Introduction to Business Planning Course ID: 1044 - Credit Hours: 1 Author(s) Kevin Arnold, RN, BSN Disclosures None Audience All health care professionals. Accreditation KLA Education Services LLC is
More informationinto the for Entry Following Entry into care team the Allied Dental Assisting guidelines. professions. programs.
ADEA Competencies for Entry into the Allied Dental Professionss (As approved by the 2011 ADEA House of Delegates) Introduction In 1998 99, the Section on Dental Hygiene of the American Association of Dental
More information6/10/2010 DISCLOSURES - NONE INTEGRATING QSEN COMPETENCIES INTO NURSING EDUCATION
INTEGRATING QSEN COMPETENCIES INTO NURSING EDUCATION Brenda Zierler, PhD, RN, RVT University of Washington School of Nursing DISCLOSURES - NONE Brenda Zierler, PhD, RN, RVT University of Washington School
More informationPhysical Therapy. Boston-Bouve College Northeastern University
Physical Therapy Boston-Bouve College Northeastern University Boston-Bouve College: A Special Educational Experience Boston-Bouve College-It's Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Health Education,
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES WITHIN THE SPECIAL EDUCATION SETTING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES WITHIN THE SPECIAL EDUCATION SETTING Preface Rationale Purpose Philosophy Legalities Definition of Terms Categories
More informationSENIOR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATE SCHEME OPPORTUNITIES
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATE SCHEME OPPORTUNITIES Community Care All Saints Home Centre Director 1. Oversee the operation which includes Nursing Operation, Finance, Facilities, Corporate & Community Relations,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY Modifications to the 2015-2017 Graduate Catalog. Page 139
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY Modifications to the 2015-2017 Graduate Catalog Program of Study Semester 6 Semester 6 Spring PHTH 6530 Psychosocial Behavioral Issues II 2 PHTH 6540 Prosthetics & Orthotics
More informationProgram Respiratory Therapy. Department Analytical and Diagnostic Sciences. College Allied Health Sciences. Year 2014
Respiratory Therapy Department Analytical and Diagnostic Sciences College Allied Health Sciences Year 2014 Primary Faculty: Shane Keene 423-335-0297 keenekn@uc.edu Faculty Committee: Mark A Washam DL I.
More informationInpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) [Preauthorization Required]
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) [Preauthorization Required] Medical Policy: MP-ME-05-09 Original Effective Date: February 18, 2009 Reviewed: April 22, 2011 Revised: This policy applies to products
More informationMeasurement of Community Participation Using a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) in Adult Burn Survivors
Measurement of Community Participation Using a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) in Adult Burn Survivors Principal Investigators: Lewis E. Kazis, ScD Alan Jette, PhD Site Specific Investigators: Colleen M.
More informationBASC & CCCPD Members. Peggy Beckley, PhD, OTR/L, BCPR, BCG, SCLV, FAOTA Chair. Peggy Barco, MS, BSW, OTR/L, SCDCM
Learning Objectives 1. Articulate an understanding of the certification process. 2. Describe the relationship between professional development, practice changes, and client outcomes and how these apply
More informationSales Checkpoint Performance Feedback System
Sales Checkpoint Performance Feedback System Technical Development Manual January, 2014 Profiles International, Inc. Profiles Office Park 5205 Lake Shore Drive Waco, Texas USA 76710 CONTENTS Chapter 1:
More informationClock Hours I Module I 01-16 224. Term # Module Title Week # II Module II 17-32 368. III Module III 33-48 176. IV Module IV 49-64 304
ASSOCIATE OF APPLIED SCIENCE IN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSISTANT (OTA AAS)) 1742 clock hours/ 80 weeks (Total time to complete the program may vary based on school holidays and breaks) 63 weeks Theory/Lab
More informationSTANDARDS. for the provision of. Inpatient Adult Rehabilitation Medicine Services. Public and Private Hospitals
Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine STANDARDS for the provision of Inpatient Adult Rehabilitation Medicine Services in Public and Private Hospitals 2011 Telephone (02) 9256 5420 145 Macquarie
More informationGeneral Therapies for Individuals with Autism
General Therapies for Individuals with Autism Speech and Language Pathology Speech- language therapy entails the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and helping to prevent speech, language, cognitive, communication,
More informationNSW HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (STATE) AWARD
IRC No 427 of 2015 Walton P New Award effective 1 July 2015 NSW HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (STATE) AWARD AWARD PART A 1. Arrangement Clause No. Subject Matter 1 Arrangement 2 Definitions 3 Classification
More informationClinical Medical Policy Outpatient Rehab Therapies (PT & OT) for Members With Special Needs
Benefit Coverage Rehabilitative services, (PT, OT,) are covered for members with neurodevelopmental disorders when recommended by a medical provider to address a specific condition, deficit, or dysfunction,
More informationVestibular Rehabilitation: Theory, Evidence and Practical Application
Vestibular Rehabilitation: Theory, Evidence and Practical Application A cademy www.ric.org/education Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago has been ranked Best Rehabilitation Hospital in America" every year
More informationPosition Classification Standard for Rehabilitation Therapy Assistant Series, GS-0636
Position Classification Standard for Rehabilitation Therapy Assistant Series, GS-0636 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 3 SPECIALIZATIONS AND TITLES...
More informationOur faculty has been hand-picked for their knowledge, experience, and enthusiasm for teaching
We welcome your interest in Advocate Lutheran General Hospital s Psychiatry Residency Program. ALGH is a 638-bed teaching hospital located adjacent to Chicago on the northwest side. We proudly provide
More informationCharting our outcomes
Charting our outcomes 2010-2016 January 2011 P r e p a r e d b y : Evangeline Danseco, PhD Director, Evaluation and Research Sherry McGee, MA Research associate 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 LOGIC
More informationSupporting Students with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD): An Intervention Model
Supporting Students with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD): An Intervention Model What is this research about? Many students in Ontario s public schools receive occupational therapy services to
More informationDisability and Rehabilitation Research Coalition
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Coalition 1501 M Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 Testimony Submitted for the Written Record by the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Coalition
More information