Lundin Petroleum. Corporate Presentation. June Jun 16. Lundin Petroleum

Transcription

1 Corporate Presentation June Jun 16 1

2 Europe s Largest Independent E&P Company Reserves Contingent Resources 716 MMboe (1) 386 MMboe 2016 Production Guidance 65,000 75,000 boepd (1) Strong balance sheet and liquidity position Strong production growth with low operating costs Share price >40 X increase in value since 2001 WF12176 p (1) EGM/Government approval received, assumed Edvard Grieg deal closing 30 June

3 Successful Organic Growth Strategy Norway Undeveloped barrel value Low cost - High value Norway Finding cost/boe >5 (1, 2) USD/boe 0.7 USD/boe (1) OMV acquired 20% of PL338 (Edvard Grieg) for a post-tax consideration of 8.7 USD/boe with an effective date of 01 January WF12176 p (2) Average analyst valuation of Johan Sverdrup is USD/boe based 15 research reports on as published between Dec 2015 and Feb

4 Geographical Focus Norway assets represent (1) 96% reserves 83% 2016 production Southern Barents Sea Barents Sea estimated yet to find resource potential 8.8 billion barrels North Sea estimated yet to find resource potential 4.7 billion barrels Access + Scale of Resource + Favourable Tax Regime WF12176 p Greater Alvheim / Utsira High (1) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July

5 Proven Track Record Alta / Gohta Edvard Grieg 2007 Johan Sverdrup MMboe 830 MMboe of net commercial resources discovered by Lundin in Norway Alvheim / Volund ,270 MMboe 207 MMboe 407 MMboe WF12176 p Note: all resource numbers are gross 5

6 Norway Quality Assets - Alvheim Hub OPEX < 6 USD/boe Gross Alvheim Estimated Ultimate Recovery (MMboe) 2C Contingent Resources Cumulative Production End of Year 2P Reserves % Alvheim Alvheim FPSO Vilje Kneler B WF12176 p P Reserves Alvheim Volund Bøyla Total PDO (1) Year end % 35% 15% 2015 WI MMboe net (1) Bøyla Volund Viper/Kobra (under development) Producing structure Infill drilling Undeveloped gas discovery Prospect Infill opportunities breakeven < 30 USD/boe Production Gas lift Water injection 6

7 Norway Quality Assets Edvard Grieg Area Gross Edvard Grieg Estimated Ultimate Recovery (MMboe) 2C gross Contingent Resources Apollo, Rolvsnes, Luno II & Luno II North 2P Reserves 90 Edvard Grieg Platform Gas Export to SAGE Oil Export to Grane Ivar Aasen (WI 1.385%) onstream Q (1) % Luno South (WI 50%) Edvard Grieg (WI 65% (2) ) Apollo (WI 50%) 2007 Discovery PDO 2015 Luno II North (WI 50%) Rolvsnes (WI 50%) WF12176 p (1) Edvard Grieg discovery initially estimated to hold between MMboe gross with mid-point of 128 MMboe Luno II (WI 50%) potential future tie-back to Edvard Grieg (2) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July

8 Norway Edvard Grieg Project delivered, safely on schedule and on budget Strong intial facilities and reservoir performance Gross plateau production of 100,000 boepd expected 2H 2016 WF12176 p

9 Edvard Grieg Deal with Statoil Acquisition Consideration 15% Edvard Grieg + Pipelines million shares for Edvard Grieg Adds 31 MMboe 2P Reserves + Cash Million SEK million shares Adds 10,000 boepd Production Revised 2016 Production Guidance 65,000 75,000 boepd million treasury shares Statoil s Total Shareholding 68.4 million (20.1%) WF12176 p EGM and Government approval received, assumed Edvard Grieg deal closing 30 June

10 Norway Quality Assets Johan Sverdrup Largest Phase 1 development on the NCS Major importance to all stakeholders Up to 40% of NCS oil production at plateau PDO approved and full field reserves are booked million boe (2P net to ) Working Interest Johan Sverdrup Unit Statoil % % Petoro % Det norske % Maersk % Breakeven oil price 30 USD/bbl (1) 1 Based on ERCE 2P reserves profile as at 31 Dec 2015 Assumes USD : NOK 8.5 and latest cost savings Processing platform Wellhead & Drilling platform Living Quarter Riser platform WF12176 p Gross Reserves: billion boe 10

11 Norway Quality Assets Johan Sverdrup PDO Submitted Phase I PDO Approval Phase I PDO Submission Phase II First Oil Phase I Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q First Oil Phase II 2022 Phase I PRODUCTION Full Field Phase I CAPEX FX SPLIT Phase 1 Full Field 380 PDO 440 Latest (3) Gross Mbopd (1) PDO -12% Latest 220 (2) 190 (2) Gross NOK billion USD 20% Other 20% NOK 60% 315 WF12176 p (1) Nominal, NOK6:USD (2) Real 2016, NOK6:USD (3) Latest debottlenecking (1) Nominal, NOK6:USD (2) Real 2016, NOK6:USD (3) Latest debottlenecking 11

12 Norway Big Fields Tend to Get Bigger Maximise resource and value through the life cycle WF12176 p Factor Change in Total Oil Reserves since PDO Troll II Valhall Ula Tordis Gullfaks Sør Ekofisk Balder Norway fields bigger than 120 MMboe Oseberg Requires participation in development phase Vigdis Glitne Draugen Snorre Fram Statfjord øst Eldfisk Alvheim Brage Heidrun Gullfaks Veslefrikk Statfjord Nord Tor Murchison Norne Tyrihans Top five fields in Norway by size Oseberg Sør Oseberg øst Gyda Edvard Grieg Grane Goliat Statfjord Njord Jotun 12

13 Low Cost - High Value Production Guidance (Mboepd) (1, 2) OPEX (USD/boe) 65 to 75 (1) > ~ Guidance J. Sverdrup Phase 1 J. Sverdrup Plateau Guidance J. Sverdrup Plateau (2) Excluding Inventory movement and MTM assets recognised in relation to Brynhild opex share USD 2.25 Bn (1) WF12176 p Norway Tax Pool (1) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July 2016 No cash tax paid at oil price < 53 USD/bbl until Johan Sverdrup first oil As at at USD : NOK

14 2016 Funding Liquidity and Net Debt New 7 year RBL of up to USD 5.0 billion secured in February 2016 Current commitment USD billion (increased by MUSD 185) Attractive margin: 315 bps 5 year grace period (no amortisation until end 2020) New MUSD 300 RCF secured 6, MUSD 5,000 4,000 3,000 4, ,303 Initial commitment 4, , billion (committed) 1.58 billion (committed plus optional) Available Liquidity Headroom 2,000 1,000 WF12176 p RBL ERF (1) RCF (2) RBL Accordion Sources of Liquidity Bertam FPSO sale RBL ERF (1) Cash Net Debt 31/03/16 (1) Exploration Refund Facility (2) Short term Revolving Credit Facility 14

15 Exploration Strategy Southern Barents Sea Geographical focus Norway Shallow water and reservoirs Less than 500 metres water depth Leverage on technology extensive 3D seismic usage Targeting conventional oil play types Norway Key exploration areas Utsira High / Greater Alvheim WF12176 p

16 Norway - Southern Barents Sea Overview licences Operator 23 rd round Oil (WI 15%) PL859 has the second largest acreage position in southern Barents Sea Partner 23 rd round Gas Discoveries Barents Sea ~ 1 billion boe discovered recently Development Johan Castberg, ~550 MMbbl Breakeven <45 USD/bbl (1) Johan Castberg discoveries (WI 60%) PL853 PL851(WI 40%) Wisting discovery Barents Sea (WI 20%) PL857 NORWAY RUSSIA Reserves Snøhvit 1.67 bn Boe (2) Goliat 180 MMboe (2) Alta & Gohta discoveries PL609C (WI 40%) Yet to Find Barents Sea 8.8 billion barrels (2), ~100 wells Snøhvit Area Goliat development WF12176 p (1) Statoil CMU Feb 16, (2) NPD Norway 0 KM

17 Norway Southern Barents Sea Loppa High Exploration and Appraisal Norway Loppa High Area licences 23 rd Oil Operator Partner 609 Børselv Gas Prospect Gohta/Alta discoveries opens up the area for significant new discoveries Kramsnø Johan Castberg Neiden Prospect (WI 40%) 204 MMboe gross PL609 Alta appraisal programme to continue in 2016/2017 Multiple prospects identified PL programme: Alta-3 re-entry & test Neiden exploration re-entry Filicudi exploration well Alta/Gohta area development feasibility study Iskrystall Filicudi Prospect (WI 35%) 258 MMboe gross Salina Gohta Discovery (WI 40%) Drivis 492 Skavl 609 B Skalle PL851(WI 40%) Loppa High PL609C (WI 40%) Alta Discovery (WI 40%) Barents Sea Alta + Gotha gross contingent resources : MMboe Hammerfest Basin WF12176 p Play fairway up to 1 billion barrels SNØHVIT 0 KM 20 17

18 Hammerfest Norway - Southeastern Barents Sea Frontier Exploration Prospects mapped on new 3D seismic drill-ready Multi-billion barrel resource potential Structure aerial closures 3 4 times the size of Johan Sverdrup Norway Southeastern Barents Sea Vadso Vadso Signalhornet Dome Aerial closure 570 km 2 ~3 X Johan Sverdrup PL857 (WI 20%) Haapet High Aerial closure 850 km 2 > 4 X Johan Sverdrup 0 KM 40 PL859 (WI 15%) Johan Sverdrup field WF12176 p KM 40 PL859 Aerial closure 200 km 2 Johan Sverdrup same scale 0 KM 40 18

19 Key Messages Production Guidance (Mboepd) (1, 2) OPEX (USD/boe) 65 to 75 (1) > ~ Guidance J. Sverdrup Phase 1 J. Sverdrup Plateau Guidance J. Sverdrup Plateau (1) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July 2016 Strong production growth with low operating costs (2) Excluding Inventory movement and MTM assets recognised in relation to Brynhild opex share Consistent sustainable organic growth strategy going forward Continued strong focus on cost discipline and operating efficiency WF12176 p Responsible operator with focus on HSE 19

20 Appendix 20

21 Core Areas: Europe & SE Asia Norway France Netherlands Russia Exploration Development Production Malaysia TOTAL WF12112 pt1 p P reserves: MMboe (1) Contingent resources: 386 MMboe (2) (1) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July 2016 (2) Net at end

22 Financial Performance 2,000 1,800 EBITDA Operating Cash Flow Total Capex Full Year 2014 Full Year ,600 1,400 1,200 EBITDA (MUSD) Operating cash flow (MUSD) , ,000 Production (boepd) 24,900 32,300 MUSD Average Brent oil price (USD/boe) Cost of operations (USD/boe) WF11543 p

23 Gas, 4% 2P Reserves Oil & NGL, 96% WF12112 pt1 p NORWAY 96% Total MMboe (2) South East Asia Continental Europe Norway Other Edvard Grieg MMboe End Production Asset Sales + Reserve Additions (excl. Sales/Acquisitions) End (1) + 15% Additional Edvard Grieg Equity (2) End additional Edvard Grieg equity Johan Sverdrup Reserves increase (1) Reserves replacement ratio (1) (1, 2) 292% 4329% As per industry standards the reserve replacement ratio is defined as the ratio of reserve additions to production during the year, excluding acquisitions and sales. The reserves increase is calculated as the ratio of the reserves additions over the reserves adjusted for sales and production. Numbers in chart may not add up due to rounding. (1) (2) EGM/Government approval received, assumed Edvard Grieg deal closing 30 June

24 2P Reserves History MMboe Cumulative Production Malaysia Norway Tunisia Netherlands France WF12164 p Year End Excluding discontinued operations 24

25 2016 Production Guidance Q production of 62,400 boepd Q1 production at upper-end of guidance driven by Edvard Grieg outperformance Full year 2016 production guidance revised (1) Revised Guidance: 65,000 75,000 boepd (1) Old Guidance: 60,000 70,000 boepd All other assets substantially performing inline with forecast Net Production Guidance (Mboepd) 100 High, including 15% added from EG Low, including 15% added from EG High Low 2016 Forecast Malaysia 12% Alvheim hub 20% Netherlands 2% France 3% Brynhild 5% WF12213 p Q1 Actual Q2 Q3 Q Forecast (1) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July Edvard Grieg 58% 25

26 Edvard Grieg Production Performance Q1 gross production 60,300 boepd Gas production commenced 3 wells on line total capacity >90,000 boepd PDO basis 24,000 boepd per well Project delivered ontime 28 th November 2015 first oil Uptime since startup ~96% Uptime excluding reservoir pressure build ups ~99% Worldclass topside performance Pressure depletion lower than expected Edvard Grieg Uptime 2016 drilling programme - 5 wells 3 water injectors and 2 producers Currently drilling first water injector Uptime 100% 100% 50% 0% 94% 96% 96% 97% 91% WF12154 p Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 26

27 Norway Utsira High Resources and Upside Potential Norway major operated acreage position ~2.7 billion boe of gross reserves under development 3 PDO approved Edvard Grieg, Ivar Aasen and Johan Sverdrup Utsira High 44 MMboe of net contingent resources high margin barrels to existing infrastructure Luno II, Luno II North, Apollo, Rolvsnes Ivar Aasen PL501 Johan Sverdrup Unit Multiple prospects and leads defined Apollo PL338 3,000 Utsira High Discoveries (gross MMboe) PL338C Edvard Grieg (Luno South) Rolvsnes Johan Sverdrup 2,500 2,000 1,500 Luno II/North Johan Sverdrup Apollo Ivar Aasen Edvard Grieg Luno II Luno II North PL815 PL265 PL501B 1,000 PL359 licences 500 PL778 PL410 Norway Operator Partner WF12176 p Year End PL544 0 KM 10 North Sea Oil field Oil discovery Gas Prospect/lead 27

28 Norway - Brynhild (WI 90%) Q Net Production 3,100 boepd Haewene Brim FPSO performance improving Water handling constraints resolved Integrity issues being resolved Water injection commenced Facilities uptime expectations reduced Reservoir performance indicates reduced connected volumes Gross ultimate 2P reserves reduced to 7.4 MMboe Production forecast reflects these issues Brynhild field Producer (A1) Producer (A3) Injector (A4) 100% Brynhild Uptime Impacted by subsea integrity issue Producer & Injector (A2) 50% WF12158 p % Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q

29 Malaysia Exploration and Production Core exploration positions in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah Total acreage is 28,000 km 2, second largest after Petronas 14.3 MMboe gross 2P reserves 96 MMboe gross contingent resources Bertam 2016 net production guidance 8,450 boepd Bertam (WI 75%) Malaysia Peninsular Malaysia Sabah Key exploration areas 2 nd largest offshore acreage holder (1) WF12176 p Broad strategic farm-down to Dyas - Strong technical non-operated partner - Spread risk in high equity blocks - Work together in new opportunities (1) source: IHS

30 Malaysia - Bertam (WI 75%) Q Net Production 8,500 boepd Strong facilities performance 98% uptime Initially planned drilling programme complete A15 infill well completed and in production Good reservoir performance decline slower than expected Cost of operations < 7 USD/bbl (excluding FPSO lease cost) Bertam field Bertam-3 A-15 0 KM 1 WF12158 p

31 France & Netherlands Mature Producing Assets Long life steady production and cash flow " Low capital requirement Offshore France Netherlands Netherlands Onshore Hydrocarbon Type Oil Gas 2015 Production Net, boepd 2,730 1,746 2P Reserves Net (1), MMboe " " Best Estimates Contingent Resources Net (1), MMboe 13.1 Paris Basin Asset Description Exploration Mature low decline onshore production 1.1 Million acres Mature on/offshore production Aquitaine Basin France (1) End USD/boe France Netherlands " Revenue WF12163 p OPEX Cash Net Back KM

32 Drilling Schedule Country Norway Licence - Prospect Well type Operator PL544 - Fosen exp Lundin Norway PL609 - Alta-3 test app Lundin Norway PL609 - Neiden re-entry exp Lundin Norway PL533 - Filicudi exp Lundin LUPE WI % NUPR (1) CoGS (2) NRPR (3) 82 30% % 23 Malaysia SB307/308 - Maligan exp Lundin Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Dry Dry Norway Alvheim Hub dev Det Norske Ongoing Norway Norway PL338 - Edvard Grieg JS Unit - Johan Sverdrup dev Lundin (4) dev Statoil Malaysia PM307 - Bertam A15 dev Lundin Ongoing Ongoing Producing Netherlands exploration wells not included WF11117 p (1) Net Unrisked Prospective Resources (MMboe) (2) Chance of Geological Success (3) Net Risked Prospective Resources (MMboe) (4) Additional Edvard Grieg equity from July

33 s Shareholders Number of shares in issue: million (1) Average traded volume per day for last 12 months: ~1.9 million shares Part of OMX30, NASDAQ Stockholm Shares in free-float approx. 51% Main shareholders (1) Lundin Family: 28.7% Statoil: 20.1% Institutional Shareholders: 37.3% (2) WF11003 p (1) 29.3 million new shares to be issued to Statoil in return for 15% of Edvard Grieg & cash. EGM/Government approval received, assumed deal completion 30 June 2016 (2) IPREO 29 February

34 Disclaimer This information has been made public in accordance with the Securities Market Act (SFS 2007:528) and/or the Financial Instruments Trading Act (SFS 1991:980). Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements made and information contained herein constitute "forward-looking information" (within the meaning of applicable securities legislation). Such statements and information (together, "forward-looking statements") relate to future events, including the Company's future performance, business prospects or opportunities. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to estimates of reserves and/or resources, future production levels, future capital expenditures and their allocation to exploration and development activities, future drilling and other exploration and development activities. Ultimate recovery of reserves or resources are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. Statements concerning proven and probable reserves and resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements and reflect conclusions that are based on certain assumptions that the reserves and resources can be economically exploited. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as "seek", "anticipate", "plan", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "predict", "potential", "targeting", "intend", "could", "might", "should", "believe" and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that these expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements should not be relied upon. These statements speak only as on the date of the information and the Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, operational risks (including exploration and development risks), productions costs, availability of drilling equipment, reliance on key personnel, reserve estimates, health, safety and environmental issues, legal risks and regulatory changes, competition, geopolitical risk, and financial risks. These risks and uncertainties are described in more detail under the heading Risks and Risk Management and elsewhere in the Company s annual report. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. WF8278 p

35