Multicast Network Administration Control in Diff Services
|
|
- Hester Briggs
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MASURMNT-BASD MULTICAST ADMISSION CONTROL IN DIFFSRV NTWORKS Olli Alanen, Mikko Pääkkönen, Timo Hämäläinen, Mikko Ketola and Jyrki Joutsensalo Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, FINLAND Abstract Multicast admission control in Differentiated Services network is an important but lightly researched subject. We propose two distinct admission control methods. The methods reject new multicast join requests that would otherwise decrease the quality experienced by the existing receivers. dge nodes filter join requests and generate new requests. The proposed methods are developed as an extension to the DSMCast protocol but could also be adapted to other protocols. In this paper the methods are compared against each other and to the situation without any admission control. I. INTRODUCTION Different Quality of Service (QoS) architectures are nowadays widely used and researched. They provide better quality in terms of guaranteed bandwidth, delay, jitter and packet loss. Differentiated Services (DiffServ) [2] has been the main interest of QoS researchers because it is currently the best solution for unicast QoS. For some new applications like IPTV and video conferencing, multicasting is another way of providing better QoS by saving network bandwidth. However, there are three major problems of transporting multicast traffic in DiffServ networks. The problems are heterogeneous trees [3] [7], scalability [3], [7], [8] and neglected reserved sub-tree (NRS) [3] [7] and they should be solved to attain guaranteed quality level for multicast traffic. DSMCast [3] is an exceptional solution for these problems. It solves the problems of heterogeneous trees and scalability and gives a competent framework for solving the NRSproblem. This paper proposes admission control extensions to the DSMCast protocol. The methods are distributed solutions to the NRS-problem and they reject the joining attempts that would degrade the QoS of the existing receivers more than is allowed. The methods could be changed to inter-operate with any other protocol with only small modifications. The methods were simulated with a network simulator [9] and the results show the strengths of these methods. II. TH ADC MTHODS We propose methods to be used in multicast admission control decisions in DiffServ networks. They solve the NRS problem described earlier. ach of the methods are distributed to the egress nodes of the network, which makes the core nodes and the whole network scalable. The basic idea is to filter the join requests arrived to the edge nodes and send some extra leave messages when necessary. A measurement based method is presented in [1] and in this paper improvements are added to it. The methods are referred as Measure 1 and 2, respectively. Also, to go a bit further, a combination of these two methods is presented to conquer the weaknessess of each one described later in the paper. The methods purpose is to check if a specified flow can reach the requirements demanded. This means that client must define the traffic profile of the flow and the QoS parameters that it should fulfill. The parameters are defined in the extended join-message Join(S,G,QoS) where the QoS parameter includes the average bandwidth usage of the flow, DSCP and the maximum acceptable value for delay. The first and second parameters indicate the source of the data and the group address. The admission control methods can be divided in three phases and next subsections describe each one of these phases. A. dge Test In the first test, the egress edge checks from its group states if it is already forwarding the group. If it is, the join request is accepted because adding new receiver to that multicast group does not increase the utilization of the DiffServ domain at all as the data is already being received at that edge. On the other hand, if the edge is not yet forwarding the group, it moves to the next test before making any decisions. B. Measurement Test The measurement test functions in the same manner no matter using method 1 or 2, and it goes as follows. The egress edge first joins the group, receives the first m of the group s packets for calculating the current value for the end-to-end delay, packet loss and jitter with the equation of exponential average (quation 1).! " If the measured values are below the acceptable maximum ones, the measurement test is accepted. The test measures (1)
2 Multicast Multicast 5Mb/s 1-3Mb/s Video traffic profile Measured videocustomer FTPserver Bottleneck C C C Measured conferens customer Bandwidth [Bits/s] Multicast servers Multicast FTP Fig. 2. Video traffic profile Fig. 1. Simulation s network topology Conference traffic profile the actual multicast traffic therefore giving the most realistic results of the current network conditions. Of course, network conditions can change rapidly therefore leading to degracion of the QoS experienced by the users. C. Bandwidth Test The bandwidth test has a slight differencies between methods 1 and 2. However, the common part for both of the tests is described next. The available bandwidth is measured simultaneously with the measurement test. When the first packet of the group arrives to the egress edge, it checks the DSMCast header to find the branching node. Then the egress edge sends to the branching node a packet indicating how much bandwidth the requested flow will utilize. When the packet is returning, it is examined at each node if there is enough bandwidth available for the flow. The bandwidth test is passed if every node on the route had enough resources available. The bandwidth test is based on so called GRIP-test, which is described more in detail in [4]. The difference between the two tests is that in method 1 the overall available bandwidth of each link on the path is monitored. On the other hand, in method 2, the available bandwidth for a particular class at each link on the path is monitored. If the bandwidth test was also accepted, the requesting receiver is joined to the multicast group. III. SIMULATION STUDIS Simulations were done with the Network Simulator 2 [9] and a GenMCast extension [10]. The topology used is presented in Fig. 1. All the measured traffic flows through all the core routers in the simulation s topology. Only two and their QoS is measured in the simulations and other multicast and FTP clients just make background traffic and join requests. In this case we do not have to care about multicast tree or routing and it is enough to examine only the path from source to destination. Figures 2 and 3 show the example traffic profiles of video -and conference who are being measured. The traffic characteristics used in the simulations is presented in Table I. IPTV and video conference traffic were Bandwidth [Bits/s] Fig. 3. Conference traffic profile used as traffic sources and there were 10 groups for both of them. The video traffic was captured from real video streams compressed to H.263 format [11]. Ten FTP clients were used and their total load was limited by defining the link between FTP servers and the core router to small enough. The upper bounds for QoS metrics are also presented in Table I. These upper bounds were used in the delay test of the admission control method. Weighted Round Robin (WRR) scheduler was used in the output queues of each node. The weight of each queue was defined a bit smaller than the amount of expected traffic in the class. The purpose of the admission control is to handle these kinds of cases. The queue lengths were defined to 25, 50 and 200 packets for conference, IPTV and bacground FTP traffic, respectively. Joins and leaves to/from the groups were randomized by certain random distributions. The duration of the membership was simulated with exponential distribution because it seems to describe the duration of the connection in a most realistic way. After leaving the group, the waited another Pareto-distributed time-interval. 80 simulations with different FTP throughput were run and the results of the simulations with explanations are shown in the next subsections. A. Low Utilization The first results are from a simulation where links were lightly loaded and the queues were not full at any time. The bandwidth of the FTP s link in this simulation was 1.3 Mb/s. It can be seen from figure 4 that the method 1 does not have a lot of effect in this kind of lightly loaded situation - the situation is almost the same with or without it. Because none
3 TABL I SIMULATIONS TRAFFIC. # # # # Traffic Bandwidth Packet-size DSCP Delay Max. Jitter Max Loss Max Control messages Video conference 68kbit/s 800Bytes 6 250ms s IPTV 270kbit/s 950Bytes ms s FTP - 900Bytes Bottleneck link throughput [Mbit/s] e e+06 adc adc Bottleneck link throughput [Mbit/s] 5.2e e e e adc adc e+06 Fig. 4. Bottleneck link s throughput in the low utilization simulation Fig. 6. Bottleneck link s throughput in the high utilization simulation Flow Delay [s] (Video customer) adc adc Number of multicast adc NO Adc Fig. 5. Video delay in low utilization scenario Fig. 7. The number of multicast in high utilization simulation of the links is heavily utilized, the admission control procedure does not reject many requests and therefore the bandwidth of the bottleneck link is utilized almost as well as in the case of no admission control. This is depicted in figure 4. However, with method 2, it can be seen clearly that the bottleneck link is not that well utilized although the amount of background traffic is the same than in case of method 1. This is due the rejections of the joining attempts. As it is depicted in figure 5, the delays of video remain at lower level than in cases of method 1 or no method at all. This is because there are less multicast within the class, hence leading to smaller delays. As the available bandwidth in method 2 is tested within each class, the background traffic is not able to cause blocking to the multicast clients based on this test. However, when the number of clients within certain class is large enough, there will be no more space in that class for new connections and therefore it leads to rejections. Now when there is not that much background traffic utilizing the remaining bandwidth, it can be said that method 2, in lightly loaded situations waste bandwidth: there may not be available bandwidth within that certain class, hence causing rejections although on the link scale there still exists available bandwidth. Method 1 on the other hand works better in lightly loaded situations by utilizing the available bandwidth better. B. High Utilization The second results are from a simulation where utilization of the network was much higher. The bandwidth of the FTP s link in this simulation was 3.0 Mb/s. The throughput of the bottleneck link is presented in the figure 6. Throughput with the method 1 is a bit lower than without it or with method 2. The increased amount of background traffic causes the delay- and bandwidth tests to fail therefore decreasing the number of accepted multicast connections with method 1. With method 2 the number of accepted multicast is bigger, hence increasing the utilization of the bottleneck link to its maximum. The number of multicast members as a funcntion of time is depicted in figure 7. As it can be seen from the throughput figure, when not using admission control at all, the situation seems to be quite the same. However, this is not the truth.
4 Flow Delay [s] (Video customer) adc adc Bottleneck Link Throughput [Mbit/s] e e+06 Fig. 8. Video customer delay in the high utilization simulation Fig. 10. Bottleneck links utilization as a function of background traffic Loss [%] adc adc Flow Delay (Video) Fig. 9. Bottleneck link s loss in the high utilization simulation Fig. 11. Video delay as a function of background traffic Figure 8 shows the corresponding delays, clearly depicting method 1 to give the smallest delays. Unlike in lightly loaded network, the delays with method 2 are now greater than with method 1. Although the delays are longer with the method 2, they are still below the acceptable limits. Anyway, in case of no admission control is used, the delays have already increased significantly due the packets being queued. In fact, in figure 9 it can be seen that some packet loss is occurring. This all is related to the large amount of background traffic. Method 1 is to reject more requests than method 2 therefore decreasing the delays while with no admission control the suffer from excessive delays and some packet loss. As the figure 6 indicates, the best throughput is achieved by not using any admission control method at all. Anyway, this is done by the cost of excessive delay and packet loss, so it is not the best solution. However, method 1 keeps the delays low and prevents packet loss from occurring while the network is never well utilized. Method 2, on the other hand, can be seen as a compromise between these two: delays are pretty low and utilization is kept very high. From an operators point of view, maintaining the network well utilized would be the ideal case. C. Utilization effect For this subsection, a total of 21 simulations were run, every round increasing the amount of the background traffic. In the figure 10 it can be seen how the bottleneck links utilization increases as a function of the FTP-traffic, from 1. Mb/s all the way up to 3.00 Mb/s. For the method 1 the critical point seems to be at 1.6 Mbit/s. At this point the increased background traffic causes that the measured QoS values do not stay within the required limits therefore causing connection requests being rejected, based on both bandwidth - and delay test. However, because the admission control 1 maintains the number of multicast receivers low enough all the time, the delay remains low throughout the simulation. This can be seen in figure 11, which depicts the delay experienced by the measured video customer. As the Qos requirements (jitter and packet loss) of video are a bit stricter than the ones of conference, it can be noted from figures 12 and 13 that video are being rejected more in relation to conference when background load increases. When not using admission control at all, the network is well utilized all the time. Also the maximum delay experienced by the multicast receivers is reached at about 2.0 Mbit/s. This is the point where the background traffic has used all the bandwidth dedicated to it on the bottleneck link. Nevertheless, because no admission control is used, the number of video and conference remain the same throughout the whole simulation. On the other hand, when using method 2, the utilization level reaches the maximum possible at about 2.5 Mbit/s - from this point onward the available bandwidth is used as well with the case of no admission control. This can be explained as follows. At 2.5 Mbit/s the background traffic has used all the bandwidth of its own plus the bandwidth which was left over from the multicast receivers. Like mentioned earlier, method 2 tends to leave some amount of bandwidth decicated to that class unused. It can be noted from the figure 11 that at 2.2 Mbit/s the delays increase the most due the packets being queued until about 2.5 Mbit/s. After this point the
5 Nbr of Video members Achieved Throughput [Bit/s] e No Adc Threshold Fig. 12. The number of video members as a function of background traffic Fig. 14. Bottleneck links throughput as a function of utilization Nbr of Conference members Fig. 13. traffic The number of conference members as a function of background Throughput (bottleneck link 0-1) [bit/s] 4.9e e e e e+06 No ADC Threshold [utilization %] Fig. 15. Average bottleneck links throughput as a function of background traffic with threshold 94% delays settle down to a certain value. This refers that multicast receivers have reached their maximum queuing delay because the amount of background traffic is at its maximum. Ss the background load increases, the amount of video -and conference decreases, but not that steeply than in case of method 1. This means that when the background load is big enough, there will be more multicast accepted with method 2 than with method 1. Again, from the operators point of view, this favors the usage of method 2 as it utilizes the network better while keeping the delays at pretty good level. In addition, in this high loaded situation it also possibilitates more accepted multicast, which normally are the more valuable ones. This leads us to a situation, where both of the methods, one and two, are good at some point. The method 1 was better in lightly loaded situations where it offered better network utilization and lower delays for the multicast. However, as the background load increased, method 2 became better at some point by offering service for more multicast clients within pretty good delay bounds and first of all, better network utilization. That s why in the following subsection we define a certain utilization threshold level which is used as a trigger to change between these two methods on the fly. D. Utilization level triggered ADC In this subsection we examine the effect of changing the admission control method on the fly. It means that when the bottleneck links utilization level reaches a certain predefined value, we change the admission control method. As it came up in the low utilization scenario, method 1 uses the network resources more efficiently. On the contrary, method 2 becomes better when the utilization is high. That s why here we use method 1 when working below the defined threshold value, and method 2 when utilization is above it. First we drove a simulation as a function of threshold level to find where the throughput reaches the best value. Figure 14 shows the result of this simulation. From the figure it can be noted that throughput reaches bigger values with changing ADC in comparison when only using either one of the methods. This bigger throughput is achieved when the threshold level is between The figure shows clearly that the best throughput values occur more or less when threshold level is set to 94. Now we can examine more in detail the effect of changing the admission control at this very threshold level. Following figures 15, 16 and 17 show us the results. Figure 15 captures the benefits of changing the method. The bandwidth of the bottleneck link is utilized well with all kinds of background traffic volume. Figure 16 also shows that the delays can be controlled with this kind of admission control. Figure 17 illustrates the effectiveness of the method by average member counts. It can be seen that the combination of the methods gives good results by accepting almost as much members as with the measurement 2 method. IV. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of an admission control are clearly shown in this paper. The results also depict the fact, that some admission control is necessary. Our two distinct measurement-based methods provide better and guaranteed quality of service in
6 Delay ADC1 (Video) [s] No ADC Threshold [utilization %] Fig. 16. Delay experienced by the video customer as a function of background traffic with threshold 94% Members total No ADC Threshold [utilization %] Fig. 17. Number of members as a function of background traffic with threshold 94% different kind of scenarios. By combining these two methods, even better utilization of the bottleneck link was achieved and the QoS-guarantees were still fulfilled. The further studies on the admission control of the multicast receivers will be continued on the area of parameter-based methods. Revenue of the network operator will also be considered as one parameter for making the admission control decisions. RFRNCS [1] O. Alanen, M. Pääkkönen, T. Hämäläinen, M. Ketola, J. Joutsensalo Multicast Admission Control in DiffServ Networks, published in ICON 2004, [2] S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson,. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss, An Architecture for Differentiated Services ITF RFC 2475, [3] A. Striegel, G. Manimaran, Dynamic DSCPs for Heterogeneous QoS in DiffServ Multicasting, Proc. of I GLOBCOM, [4] G. Bianchi, N. Blefari-Melazzi, G. Bonafede and. Tintinelli, QUASI- MODO: QUAlity of ServIce-aware Multicasting Over DiffServ and Overlay networks, I Network, [5] B. Yang, P. Mohapatra, Multicasting in Differentiated Service domains, Proc. of I GLOBCOM, [6] R. Bless, K. Wehrle, IP Multicast in Differentiated Services Networks, ITF (In Progress) Draft, [7] A.Striegel, A. Bouabdallah, H. Bettahar, G. Manimaran, BM: A New Approach for Scalable DiffServ Multicasting, Proc. of Fifth International Workshop on Network Group Communications (NGC), [8] Z. Li and P. Mohapatra, QoS-Aware Multicasting in DiffServ Domains, Proc. of Global Internet Symposium, [9] Network Simulator, Available at: $ URL: [10] A. Striegel, GenMCast Software xtension for ns-2, ND CS Technical Report, Available at: $ URL: striegel/genmcast/%, [11] F. Fitzek and M. Reisslein, MPG-4 and H.263 Video Traces for Network Performance valuation, I Network, vol 15, no 6, pages 40-54, November/December [12] S. Lima, P. Carvalho, A. Santos, V. Freitas, A Distributed Admission Control Model for Class-based Networks Using dge-to-dge QoS and SLS Monitoring, Proc of I ICCS, [13] G. Bianchi, N. Blefari-Melazzi, Admission Control over Assured Forwarding PHBs: A Way to Provide Service Accuracy in a DiffServ Framework, I GLOBCOM, 2001.
Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service
2009 International Symposium on Computing, Communication, and Control (ISCCC 2009) Proc.of CSIT vol.1 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service Ajith
More informationInvestigation and Comparison of MPLS QoS Solution and Differentiated Services QoS Solutions
Investigation and Comparison of MPLS QoS Solution and Differentiated Services QoS Solutions Steve Gennaoui, Jianhua Yin, Samuel Swinton, and * Vasil Hnatyshin Department of Computer Science Rowan University
More informationHow To Provide Qos Based Routing In The Internet
CHAPTER 2 QoS ROUTING AND ITS ROLE IN QOS PARADIGM 22 QoS ROUTING AND ITS ROLE IN QOS PARADIGM 2.1 INTRODUCTION As the main emphasis of the present research work is on achieving QoS in routing, hence this
More informationChapter 7 outline. 7.5 providing multiple classes of service 7.6 providing QoS guarantees RTP, RTCP, SIP. 7: Multimedia Networking 7-71
Chapter 7 outline 7.1 multimedia networking applications 7.2 streaming stored audio and video 7.3 making the best out of best effort service 7.4 protocols for real-time interactive applications RTP, RTCP,
More information4 Internet QoS Management
4 Internet QoS Management Rolf Stadler School of Electrical Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology stadler@ee.kth.se September 2008 Overview Network Management Performance Mgt QoS Mgt Resource Control
More informationQoS Parameters. Quality of Service in the Internet. Traffic Shaping: Congestion Control. Keeping the QoS
Quality of Service in the Internet Problem today: IP is packet switched, therefore no guarantees on a transmission is given (throughput, transmission delay, ): the Internet transmits data Best Effort But:
More informationMultimedia Requirements. Multimedia and Networks. Quality of Service
Multimedia Requirements Chapter 2: Representation of Multimedia Data Chapter 3: Multimedia Systems Communication Aspects and Services Multimedia Applications and Transfer/Control Protocols Quality of Service
More informationPFS scheme for forcing better service in best effort IP network
Paper PFS scheme for forcing better service in best effort IP network Monika Fudała and Wojciech Burakowski Abstract The paper presents recent results corresponding to a new strategy for source traffic
More informationQuality of Service in the Internet. QoS Parameters. Keeping the QoS. Traffic Shaping: Leaky Bucket Algorithm
Quality of Service in the Internet Problem today: IP is packet switched, therefore no guarantees on a transmission is given (throughput, transmission delay, ): the Internet transmits data Best Effort But:
More informationFigure 1: Network Topology
Improving NGN with QoS Strategies Marcel C. Castro, Tatiana B. Pereira, Thiago L. Resende CPqD Telecom & IT Solutions Campinas, S.P., Brazil E-mail: {mcastro; tatibp; tresende}@cpqd.com.br Abstract Voice,
More informationAn Adaptive Load Balancing to Provide Quality of Service
An Adaptive Load Balancing to Provide Quality of Service 1 Zahra Vali, 2 Massoud Reza Hashemi, 3 Neda Moghim *1, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran 2, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan,
More informationQoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute of Technology P.O.Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani,
More information16/5-05 Datakommunikation - Jonny Pettersson, UmU 2. 16/5-05 Datakommunikation - Jonny Pettersson, UmU 4
Multimedia Networking Principles Last time Classify multimedia Multimedia Networking Applications Streaming stored audio and video Identify the network Real-time Multimedia: Internet Phone services the
More informationRequirements of Voice in an IP Internetwork
Requirements of Voice in an IP Internetwork Real-Time Voice in a Best-Effort IP Internetwork This topic lists problems associated with implementation of real-time voice traffic in a best-effort IP internetwork.
More informationImproving QOS in IP Networks. Principles for QOS Guarantees. Principles for QOS Guarantees (more) Principles for QOS Guarantees (more)
Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: making the best of best effort Future: next generation Internet with QoS guarantees RSVP: signaling for resource reservations Differentiated Services: differential
More informationVoIP Network Dimensioning using Delay and Loss Bounds for Voice and Data Applications
VoIP Network Dimensioning using Delay and Loss Bounds for Voice and Data Applications Veselin Rakocevic School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences City University, London, UK V.Rakocevic@city.ac.uk
More informationFuzzy Active Queue Management for Assured Forwarding Traffic in Differentiated Services Network
Fuzzy Active Management for Assured Forwarding Traffic in Differentiated Services Network E.S. Ng, K.K. Phang, T.C. Ling, L.Y. Por Department of Computer Systems & Technology Faculty of Computer Science
More informationPerformance Evaluation of Quality of Service Assurance in MPLS Networks
114 Performance Evaluation of Quality of Service Assurance in MPLS Networks Karol Molnar, Jiri Hosek, Lukas Rucka, Dan Komosny and Martin Vlcek Brno University of Technology, Communication, Purkynova 118,
More informationA Review on Quality of Service Architectures for Internet Network Service Provider (INSP)
A Review on Quality of Service Architectures for Internet Network Service Provider (INSP) Herman and Azizah bte Abd. Rahman Faculty of Computer Science and Information System Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
More informationCS/ECE 438: Communication Networks. Internet QoS. Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE
CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE Introduction The Internet only provides a best effort service
More informationPRIORITY-BASED NETWORK QUALITY OF SERVICE
PRIORITY-BASED NETWORK QUALITY OF SERVICE ANIMESH DALAKOTI, NINA PICONE, BEHROOZ A. SHIRAZ School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Washington State University, WA, USA 99163 WEN-ZHAN SONG
More informationThe network we see so far. Internet Best Effort Service. Is best-effort good enough? An Audio Example. Network Support for Playback
The network we see so far CSE56 - Lecture 08 QoS Network Xiaowei Yang TCP saw-tooth FIFO w/ droptail or red Best-effort service Web-surfing, email, ftp, file-sharing Internet Best Effort Service Our network
More informationQuality of Service versus Fairness. Inelastic Applications. QoS Analogy: Surface Mail. How to Provide QoS?
18-345: Introduction to Telecommunication Networks Lectures 20: Quality of Service Peter Steenkiste Spring 2015 www.cs.cmu.edu/~prs/nets-ece Overview What is QoS? Queuing discipline and scheduling Traffic
More informationSmart Queue Scheduling for QoS Spring 2001 Final Report
ENSC 833-3: NETWORK PROTOCOLS AND PERFORMANCE CMPT 885-3: SPECIAL TOPICS: HIGH-PERFORMANCE NETWORKS Smart Queue Scheduling for QoS Spring 2001 Final Report By Haijing Fang(hfanga@sfu.ca) & Liu Tang(llt@sfu.ca)
More informationHow To Share Bandwidth On A Diffserv Network
Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Telecommunications and Malaysia International Conference on Communications, 14-17 May 2007, Penang, Malaysia Bandwidth Sharing Scheme in DiffServ-aware
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF QUALITY OF SERVICE COMPUTER NETWORK
Abstract AN OVERVIEW OF QUALITY OF SERVICE COMPUTER NETWORK Mrs. Amandeep Kaur, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Application, Apeejay Institute of Management, Ramamandi, Jalandhar-144001, Punjab,
More informationPerformance Evaluation of AODV, OLSR Routing Protocol in VOIP Over Ad Hoc
(International Journal of Computer Science & Management Studies) Vol. 17, Issue 01 Performance Evaluation of AODV, OLSR Routing Protocol in VOIP Over Ad Hoc Dr. Khalid Hamid Bilal Khartoum, Sudan dr.khalidbilal@hotmail.com
More informationQuality of Service (QoS) on Netgear switches
Quality of Service (QoS) on Netgear switches Section 1 Principles and Practice of QoS on IP networks Introduction to QoS Why? In a typical modern IT environment, a wide variety of devices are connected
More informationQuality of Service using Traffic Engineering over MPLS: An Analysis. Praveen Bhaniramka, Wei Sun, Raj Jain
Praveen Bhaniramka, Wei Sun, Raj Jain Department of Computer and Information Science The Ohio State University 201 Neil Ave, DL39 Columbus, OH 43210 USA Telephone Number: +1 614-292-3989 FAX number: +1
More informationCS 268: Lecture 13. QoS: DiffServ and IntServ
CS 268: Lecture 13 QoS: DiffServ and IntServ Ion Stoica Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 1
More informationRajesh Kochher* and Vinay Chopra**
I J C International Journal of lectrical, lectronics and Computer ngineering 1(1): 1-5(2012) Performance valuation of Scheduling Algorithms in WLAN Network with CBR Application using Qualnet Rajesh Kochher*
More information18: Enhanced Quality of Service
18: Enhanced Quality of Service Mark Handley Traditional best-effort queuing behaviour in routers Data transfer: datagrams: individual packets no recognition of flows connectionless: no signalling Forwarding:
More informationEstablishing How Many VoIP Calls a Wireless LAN Can Support Without Performance Degradation
Establishing How Many VoIP Calls a Wireless LAN Can Support Without Performance Degradation ABSTRACT Ángel Cuevas Rumín Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Department of Telematic Engineering Ph.D Student
More informationModeling and Simulation of Queuing Scheduling Disciplines on Packet Delivery for Next Generation Internet Streaming Applications
Modeling and Simulation of Queuing Scheduling Disciplines on Packet Delivery for Next Generation Internet Streaming Applications Sarhan M. Musa Mahamadou Tembely Matthew N. O. Sadiku Pamela H. Obiomon
More informationHow To Improve Performance On A Ccdn (Dns)
Enhanced Content Delivery Network to Improve the QoE 1 Sachendra Singh Solanky, 2 Sandra Brigit Johnson, 3 Vakkalagadda Eswar Praphul 1 M.Tech Student SCSE, VIT University Chennai-600048, 2 M.Tech Student
More informationChapter 2. Literature Review
Chapter 2 Literature Review This chapter presents a literature review on Load balancing based Traffic Engineering, VoIP application, Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy System, and Intra & Inter Domain Networks. 2.1 Load
More informationQuantifying the Quality of Service of Streaming Media in Differentiated Services Networks
Quantifying the Quality of Service of Streaming Media in Differentiated Services Networks D.K. Agrawal 1, T. Kleiberg 1,S.Papp 1,R.E.Kooij 1,2,P.VanMieghem 1 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mathematics
More informationHow To Provide Quality Of Service In Multiiservice Ip Networks
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS (NIŠ) SER.: ELEC. ENERG. vol. 17, August 2004, 261-274 A Novel Approach for Providing Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks Mirjana Stojanović and Vladanka Aćimović-Raspopović
More informationEINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Examination Computer Networks (2IC15) on Monday, June 22 nd 2009, 9.00h-12.00h. First read the entire examination. There
More informationThe QoS of the Edge Router based on DiffServ
The QoS of the Edge Router based on DiffServ Zhang Nan 1, Mao Pengxuan 1, Xiao Yang 1, Kiseon Kim 2 1 Institute of Information and Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China 2 Dept. of
More informationQuality of Service on the Internet: Evaluation of the IntServ Architecture on the Linux Operative System 1
Quality of Service on the Internet: Evaluation of the IntServ Architecture on the Linux Operative System 1 Elisabete Reis elreis@dei.uc.pt Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra Fernando Melo fmelor@dei.uc.pt
More informationA Policy-Based Admission Control Scheme for Voice over IP Networks
Journal of Computer Science 5 (11): 817-821, 2009 ISSN 1549-3636 2009 Science Publications A Policy-Based Admission Control Scheme for Voice over IP Networks Sami Alwakeel and Agung Prasetijo Department
More informationChapter 4. VoIP Metric based Traffic Engineering to Support the Service Quality over the Internet (Inter-domain IP network)
Chapter 4 VoIP Metric based Traffic Engineering to Support the Service Quality over the Internet (Inter-domain IP network) 4.1 Introduction Traffic Engineering can be defined as a task of mapping traffic
More informationA Power Efficient QoS Provisioning Architecture for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
A Power Efficient QoS Provisioning Architecture for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Didem Gozupek 1,Symeon Papavassiliou 2, Nirwan Ansari 1, and Jie Yang 1 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
More informationQoS Performance Evaluation in BGP/MPLS VPN
1 QoS Performance Evaluation in BGP/MPLS VPN M. C. Castro, N. A. Nassif and W. C. Borelli 1 Abstract-- The recent exponential growth of the Internet has encouraged more applications, users and services
More informationEQ-BGP: an efficient inter-domain QoS routing protocol
EQ-BGP: an efficient inter-domain QoS routing protocol Andrzej Beben Institute of Telecommunications Warsaw University of Technology Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland abeben@tele.pw.edu.pl Abstract
More informationJoint ITU-T/IEEE Workshop on Carrier-class Ethernet
Joint ITU-T/IEEE Workshop on Carrier-class Ethernet Quality of Service for unbounded data streams Reactive Congestion Management (proposals considered in IEE802.1Qau) Hugh Barrass (Cisco) 1 IEEE 802.1Qau
More informationThe Performance of Measurement-Based Overlay Networks
The Performance of Measurement-Based Overlay Networks Daniel Bauer, Sean Rooney, Paolo Scotton, Ilias Iliadis, Sonja Buchegger IBM Research Säumerstrasse 4 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland Measurement Based
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP
Scientific Bulletin of the Electrical Engineering Faculty Year 11 No. 2 (16) ISSN 1843-6188 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP Emil DIACONU 1, Gabriel PREDUŞCĂ 2, Denisa CÎRCIUMĂRESCU
More information02-QOS-ADVANCED-DIFFSRV
IP QoS DiffServ Differentiated Services Architecture Agenda DiffServ Principles DS-Field, DSCP Historical Review Newest Implementations Per-Hop Behaviors (PHB) DiffServ in Detail DiffServ in other Environments
More informationComparative Analysis of Congestion Control Algorithms Using ns-2
www.ijcsi.org 89 Comparative Analysis of Congestion Control Algorithms Using ns-2 Sanjeev Patel 1, P. K. Gupta 2, Arjun Garg 3, Prateek Mehrotra 4 and Manish Chhabra 5 1 Deptt. of Computer Sc. & Engg,
More informationHPAM: Hybrid Protocol for Application Level Multicast. Yeo Chai Kiat
HPAM: Hybrid Protocol for Application Level Multicast Yeo Chai Kiat Scope 1. Introduction 2. Hybrid Protocol for Application Level Multicast (HPAM) 3. Features of HPAM 4. Conclusion 1. Introduction Video
More informationSupporting End-to-End QoS in DiffServ/MPLS Networks
Supporting End-to-End QoS in DiffServ/MPLS Networks Ji-Feng Chiu, *Zuo-Po Huang, *Chi-Wen Lo, *Wen-Shyang Hwang and Ce-Kuen Shieh Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
More informationDifferentiated Services:
Differentiated Services: A Tutorial Overview with a Voice over IP Slant Kathleen Nichols kmn@cisco.com ETSI Workhop on Voice over IP June 9, 1999 1 of 24 Differentiated Services The differentiated services
More informationThe need for bandwidth management and QoS control when using public or shared networks for disaster relief work
International Telecommunication Union The need for bandwidth management and QoS control when using public or shared networks for disaster relief work Stephen Fazio Chief, Global Telecommunications Officer
More informationPerformance Evaluation of the Impact of QoS Mechanisms in an IPv6 Network for IPv6-Capable Real-Time Applications
Journal of Network and Systems Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2004 ( C 2004) DOI: 10.1007/s10922-004-0672-5 Performance Evaluation of the Impact of QoS Mechanisms in an IPv6 Network for IPv6-Capable
More informationVoice over IP. Overview. What is VoIP and how it works. Reduction of voice quality. Quality of Service for VoIP
Voice over IP Andreas Mettis University of Cyprus November 23, 2004 Overview What is VoIP and how it works. Reduction of voice quality. Quality of Service for VoIP 1 VoIP VoIP (voice over IP - that is,
More informationKing Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Computer Engineering g Dept
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Computer Engineering g Dept COE 543 Mobile and Wireless Networks Term 111 Dr. Ashraf S. Hasan Mahmoud Rm 22-148-3 Ext. 1724 Email: ashraf@kfupm.edu.sa 12/24/2011
More informationInfluence of Load Balancing on Quality of Real Time Data Transmission*
SERBIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 6, No. 3, December 2009, 515-524 UDK: 004.738.2 Influence of Load Balancing on Quality of Real Time Data Transmission* Nataša Maksić 1,a, Petar Knežević 2,
More informationFaculty of Engineering Computer Engineering Department Islamic University of Gaza 2012. Network Chapter# 19 INTERNETWORK OPERATION
Faculty of Engineering Computer Engineering Department Islamic University of Gaza 2012 Network Chapter# 19 INTERNETWORK OPERATION Review Questions ٢ Network Chapter# 19 INTERNETWORK OPERATION 19.1 List
More informationQoS in VoIP. Rahul Singhai Parijat Garg
QoS in VoIP Rahul Singhai Parijat Garg Outline Introduction The VoIP Setting QoS Issues Service Models Techniques for QoS Voice Quality Monitoring Sample solution from industry Conclusion Introduction
More informationCS640: Introduction to Computer Networks. Why a New Service Model? Utility curve Elastic traffic. Aditya Akella. Lecture 20 QoS
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 QoS Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient Some applications need more assurances from the network What is the basic
More informationTowards End-to-End QoS in Ad Hoc Networks Connected to Fixed Networks
Towards End-to-End QoS in Ad Hoc Networks Connected to Fixed Networks David Remondo Telematics Engineering Dep., Catalonia Univ. of Technology (UPC) Av. del Canal Olímpic s/n 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona),
More informationQuality of Service. Traditional Nonconverged Network. Traditional data traffic characteristics:
Quality of Service 1 Traditional Nonconverged Network Traditional data traffic characteristics: Bursty data flow FIFO access Not overly time-sensitive; delays OK Brief outages are survivable 2 1 Converged
More informationQoS in IP networks. Computer Science Department University of Crete HY536 - Network Technology Lab II 2000-2001. IETF Integrated Services (IntServ)
QoS in IP networks Computer Science Department University of Crete HY536 - Network Technology Lab II 2000-2001 IETF Integrated Services (IntServ) Connection-oriented solution (end-to-end) QoS guarantees
More informationSUNYIT. Reaction Paper 2. Measuring the performance of VoIP over Wireless LAN
SUNYIT Reaction Paper 2 Measuring the performance of VoIP over Wireless LAN SUBMITTED BY : SANJEEVAKUMAR 10/3/2013 Summary of the Paper The paper s main goal is to compare performance of VoIP in both LAN
More informationHow To Deliver High Quality Telephony Over A Network
Voice over Application Note Telephony Service over Satellite January 2012 Data Sells but Voice Pays In the early years of the industry, networks were deployed primarily for telephony services. As time
More informationInternet Infrastructure Measurement: Challenges and Tools
Internet Infrastructure Measurement: Challenges and Tools Internet Infrastructure Measurement: Challenges and Tools Outline Motivation Challenges Tools Conclusion Why Measure? Why Measure? Internet, with
More information12 Quality of Service (QoS)
Burapha University ก Department of Computer Science 12 Quality of Service (QoS) Quality of Service Best Effort, Integrated Service, Differentiated Service Factors that affect the QoS Ver. 0.1 :, prajaks@buu.ac.th
More informationCHAPTER 6. VOICE COMMUNICATION OVER HYBRID MANETs
CHAPTER 6 VOICE COMMUNICATION OVER HYBRID MANETs Multimedia real-time session services such as voice and videoconferencing with Quality of Service support is challenging task on Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANETs).
More informationQuality of Service for IP Videoconferencing Engineering White Paper
Engineering White Paper Subha Dhesikan Cisco Systems June 1 st, 2001 Copyright 2002 Cisco Systems, Inc. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 WHY QOS? 4 3 QOS PRIMITIVES 5 4 QOS ARCHITECTURES 7 4.1 DIFFERENTIATED
More informationThis topic lists the key mechanisms use to implement QoS in an IP network.
IP QoS Mechanisms QoS Mechanisms This topic lists the key mechanisms use to implement QoS in an IP network. QoS Mechanisms Classification: Each class-oriented QoS mechanism has to support some type of
More informationAnalysis of Delayed Reservation Scheme in Server-based QoS Management Network
Analysis of Delayed Reservation Scheme in Server-based QoS Management Network Takeshi Ikenaga Ý, Kenji Kawahara Ý, Tetsuya Takine Þ, and Yuji Oie Ý Ý Dept. of Computer Science and Electronics, Kyushu Institute
More informationMPLS-TP. Future Ready. Today. Introduction. Connection Oriented Transport
MPLS-TP Future Ready. Today Introduction As data traffic started dominating telecom networks, there was a need for transport data networks, as opposed to transport TDM networks. Traditional transport technologies
More informationVoIP QoS. Version 1.0. September 4, 2006. AdvancedVoIP.com. sales@advancedvoip.com support@advancedvoip.com. Phone: +1 213 341 1431
VoIP QoS Version 1.0 September 4, 2006 AdvancedVoIP.com sales@advancedvoip.com support@advancedvoip.com Phone: +1 213 341 1431 Copyright AdvancedVoIP.com, 1999-2006. All Rights Reserved. No part of this
More informationQuality of Service Analysis of site to site for IPSec VPNs for realtime multimedia traffic.
Quality of Service Analysis of site to site for IPSec VPNs for realtime multimedia traffic. A Network and Data Link Layer infrastructure Design to Improve QoS in Voice and video Traffic Jesús Arturo Pérez,
More informationALCATEL CRC Antwerpen Fr. Wellesplein 1 B-2018 Antwerpen +32/3/240.8550; Suresh.Leroy@alcatel.be +32/3/240.7830; Guy.Reyniers@alcatel.
Contact: ALCATEL CRC Antwerpen Fr. Wellesplein 1 B-2018 Antwerpen +32/3/240.8550; Suresh.Leroy@alcatel.be +32/3/240.7830; Guy.Reyniers@alcatel.be Voice over (Vo) was developed at some universities to diminish
More informationAnalysis of QoS Routing Approach and the starvation`s evaluation in LAN
www.ijcsi.org 360 Analysis of QoS Routing Approach and the starvation`s evaluation in LAN 1 st Ariana Bejleri Polytechnic University of Tirana, Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Engineering Department,
More informationVoice Over IP. MultiFlow 5048. IP Phone # 3071 Subnet # 10.100.24.0 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 IP address 10.100.24.171. Telephone.
Anritsu Network Solutions Voice Over IP Application Note MultiFlow 5048 CALL Manager Serv # 10.100.27 255.255.2 IP address 10.100.27.4 OC-48 Link 255 255 25 IP add Introduction Voice communications over
More informationdiversifeye Application Note
diversifeye Application Note Test Performance of IGMP based Multicast Services with emulated IPTV STBs Shenick Network Systems Test Performance of IGMP based Multicast Services with emulated IPTV STBs
More informationIVCi s IntelliNet SM Network
IVCi s IntelliNet SM Network Technical White Paper Introduction...2 Overview...2 A True ATM Solution End to End...2 The Power of a Switched Network...2 Data Throughput:...3 Improved Security:...3 Class
More informationManagement of Telecommunication Networks. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov akz@tu-sofia.bg
Management of Telecommunication Networks Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov akz@tu-sofia.bg Part 1 Quality of Services I QoS Definition ISO 9000 defines quality as the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics
More informationOn real-time delay monitoring in software-defined networks
On real-time delay monitoring in software-defined networks Victor S. Altukhov Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow, Russia victoralt@lvk.cs.msu.su Eugene V. Chemeritskiy Applied Research Center for
More informationRBA-RIO Rate Based Adaptive Red With In and Out. Algorithm for DiffServ AF PHB
RBA-RIO Rate Based Adaptive Red With In and Out Algorithm for DiffServ AF PHB Zhang Mgjie Zhu Peidong Su Jshu Lu Xicheng School of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073,
More informationPath Selection Analysis in MPLS Network Based on QoS
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), Cilt:36, No: 6 Özel Sayı (2015) ISSN: 1300-1949 Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 6 Special
More informationCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT QUEUING MECHANISMS IN HETROGENEOUS NETWORKS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT QUEUING MECHANISMS IN HETROGENEOUS NETWORKS Shubhangi Rastogi 1, Samir Srivastava 2 M.Tech Student, Computer Science and Engineering, KNIT, Sultanpur, India 1 Associate
More information5 Performance Management for Web Services. Rolf Stadler School of Electrical Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology. stadler@ee.kth.
5 Performance Management for Web Services Rolf Stadler School of Electrical Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology stadler@ee.kth.se April 2008 Overview Service Management Performance Mgt QoS Mgt
More informationThree Key Design Considerations of IP Video Surveillance Systems
Three Key Design Considerations of IP Video Surveillance Systems 2012 Moxa Inc. All rights reserved. Three Key Design Considerations of IP Video Surveillance Systems Copyright Notice 2012 Moxa Inc. All
More informationSecurity and QoS requirements in Telemedicine. Kevin Wang CSCI E-139
Security and QoS requirements in Telemedicine Kevin Wang CSCI E-139 Basic idea behind telemedicine Applications in Telemedicine Tele-Surgery Tele-Diagnosis Tele-Education Tele-Monitoring Exchange of medical
More informationRecovery Modeling in MPLS Networks
Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Computer and Communication Engineering, ICCCE 06 Vol. I, 9-11 May 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Recovery Modeling in MPLS Networks Wajdi Al-Khateeb 1, Sufyan Al-Irhayim
More informationNetwork Management Quality of Service I
Network Management Quality of Service I Patrick J. Stockreisser p.j.stockreisser@cs.cardiff.ac.uk Lecture Outline Basic Network Management (Recap) Introduction to QoS Packet Switched Networks (Recap) Common
More informationA New Proposal for Assuring Services in Internet
A New Proposal for Assuring Services in Internet Maria-Dolores Cano, Fernando Cerdan, Joan Garcia-Haro, Josemaria Malgosa-Sanahuja Department of Information echnologies and Communications Polytechnic University
More informationQuality of Service Routing in MPLS Networks Using Delay and Bandwidth Constraints
Quality of Service Routing in MPLS Networks Using Delay and Bandwidth Constraints Mohammad HossienYaghmae Computer Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashad, Mashhad, Iran hyaghmae@ferdowsi.um.ac.ir
More informationMotivation. QoS Guarantees. Internet service classes. Certain applications require minimum level of network performance:
QoS Guarantees Motivation introduction call admission traffic specification link-level scheduling call setup protocol reading: Tannenbaum, 393-395, 458-471 Ch 6 in Ross/Kurose Certain applications require
More informationQuality of Service in the Internet:
Quality of Service in the Internet: Fact, Fiction, or Compromise? Paul Ferguson, Cisco Systems, Inc. Geoff Huston, Telstra What is the Expectation? Today s Internet is plagued by sporadic poor performance
More informationTechnology Overview. Class of Service Overview. Published: 2014-01-10. Copyright 2014, Juniper Networks, Inc.
Technology Overview Class of Service Overview Published: 2014-01-10 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1194 North Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net Juniper Networks, Junos,
More informationFlow aware networking for effective quality of service control
IMA Workshop on Scaling 22-24 October 1999 Flow aware networking for effective quality of service control Jim Roberts France Télécom - CNET james.roberts@cnet.francetelecom.fr Centre National d'etudes
More informationHow To Make A Network Plan Based On Bg, Qos, And Autonomous System (As)
Policy Based QoS support using BGP Routing Priyadarsi Nanda and Andrew James Simmonds Department of Computer Systems Faculty of Information Technology University of Technology, Sydney Broadway, NSW Australia
More informationAn Analysis of the DiffServ Approach in Mobile Environments
1 An Analysis of the DiffServ Approach in Mobile Environments Torsten Braun, University of Berne, Switzerland. (braun@iam.unibe.ch) Claude Castelluccia, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, France. (claude.castelluccia@inrialpes.fr)
More informationComparing the Performance of Real-Time Applications based on IPv4 and IPv6 Networks
Comparing the Performance of Real-Time Applications based on IPv4 and IPv6 Networks Vahid Ghoreishi1, Shahram Mohammadi2 MSc graduate1, Assistant professor2 Department of electrical and electronic engineering
More information