Quality Manual ISO/IEC Mandatory Disclosure Attestation
|
|
- Bertram Cameron
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 This document explains the mandatory disclosure attestation required for product certification in the ONC Health IT Certification Program. The health IT developer must provide the disclosure language they will use for their product-version. The Drummond Group LLC ONC-ACB must have this information prior to issuing a certification. This document includes requirements for the disclosure attestation letter, as well as Drummond guidelines and examples for reference. Per ONC regulations, the disclosure attestation letter submitted will be attached to your Test Reports Summary which will be made public on Drummond Group s website. It is the language you plan on using for marketing materials and on your website. Document Created by: DRUMMOND GROUP LLC PHONE: Page 1 of 9
2 Overview of ONC Regulation This section is an overview of the requirements. For a complete explanation of the disclosure requirements, refer to the ONC 2015 Edition Final Rule found here: Regulation (k)(1)(iii) states that an EHR Module developer must conspicuously include, in plain language, the following on its website and in all marketing materials, communications statements, and other assertions related to the Complete EHR or EHR Module s certification: (A) Any additional types of costs that an EP, EH, or CAH would pay to implement the Complete EHR s or EHR Module s capabilities in order to attempt to meet meaningful use objectives and measures. (B) Limitations that a user may encounter in the course of implementing and using the Complete EHR of Health IT Module s capabilities, whether to meet meaningful use objectives and measures or to achieve any other use within the scope of the health IT s certification. In the Final Rule, ONC clarified that these types of costs are in addition to those costs that an EP, EH, or CAH would pay to purchase the EHR technology capabilities for which certification is required. The costs or fees may be imposed by the developer or third party to purchase, license, implement, maintain, upgrade, use, or otherwise enable and support the use of capabilities to which health IT is certified. These may be one-time or recurring costs, or both. Drummond must ensure that EHR technology developers disclose, with particularity, the types of additional costs, but does not require that the actual dollar amounts of such costs be disclosed. Limitations are, by contract or otherwise, limits on the use of any capability to which technology is certified for any purpose within the scope of the technology s certification. These limitations include, but are not limited to, technical or practical limitations of technology or its capabilities that could prevent or impair the successful implementation, configuration, customization, maintenance, support, or use of any capabilities to which the technology is certified. Limitations that could prevent or limit the use, exchange, or portability of any data generated in the course of using a certified capability must also be disclosed. *Note: EHR technology self-developers are excluded from this requirement ( (k)(1)(iii). Reference Self-Developer Exclusion in the additional information below. Additional Information Changes to the Disclosure Language An organization may change their disclosure language at any time to reflect new business policies or decisions. However, the new language must be sent to DG in the form of the attestation disclosure letter described in this document. There are no additional costs for updating disclosure language. Page 2 of 9
3 Self-Developer Exclusion Per the ONC ruling, EHR technology self-developers can be excluded from this requirement ( (k)(1)(iii). To obtain this exemption, EHR technology self-developers must submit this attestation that they are an EHR technology self-developer and their EHR technology will not be marketed or made commercially available for sale to health care providers. Reference the Disclosure Attestation Letter Instructions to include the necessary language for all attestations. Non-compliance Consequences Per the Final Rule, the ONC-ACB is responsible for ensuring compliance and determining appropriate consequences if EHR technology developers fail to disclose the information specified in (k)(1), including inaccurate or missing disclosure information. Organizations will be regularly surveyed to confirm they are properly reporting their disclosures in conjunction with their certification status. Organizations failing to conspicuously include the disclosure details on their web site and in all marketing materials, communications statements, and other assertions related to the Complete EHR or EHR Module s certification may have their product s certification status revoked. Page 3 of 9
4 Rules and Guidance on Disclosures Language The specifics of the disclosures language are left to each certifying organization, but the following rules and guidelines for ensuring transparency compliance are used by DG ONC-ACB (key words from RFC 2119). The attributed service, functionality or software MUST be referenced in human readable text and not solely in reference to the ONC criteria. For example, online portal service rather than e.1. However, the ONC criteria MAY be included for clarity. In situations where the same types of cost apply to different services, each part MAY be listed in a sentence clearly identifying the cost attributes. For example, a one-time fee is required to establish interfaces for reporting to immunization registries, cancer registries, and public health agencies. Use these questions to help guide you when writing your disclosure letter. ADDITONAL COSTS: What costs/fees are not included in the initial purchase of this software? Are these costs/fees fixed, one-time, recurring, ongoing, monthly, transaction based, annual, etc.? What software must be purchased that is not included in the initial purchase of this software? What kinds of services, functionality or software is attributed to this cost? Are there are any limitations of workstations or licenses where the software is deployed, volume of transactions or usage or associated bandwidth limitations? CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: Does a provider have to sign a contract when purchasing your product? If so, what are the terms for contractual obligation? (i.e. 1-year contract) TECHINCAL OR PRACTICAL LIMITATIONS: Are there any additional services a provider must purchase that are not included in the initial purchase? Page 4 of 9
5 Is it necessary to engage with a third party in order to use your product? To your knowledge, is there an agreement that providers must enter into with this third party? If there is a third party involved, are there any limitations to which third party the provider chooses in order to use your software? Any limitation that would inhibit a provider from using your product must be stated. ITEMS THAT DO NOT NEED TO BE INCLUDED: Software and services which are included in the normal purchase price of the EHR technology capabilities SHOULD NOT be included. For example, the purchase price includes ongoing support for full use of online patient portal for any customer. Additional software or services which an EP, EH or CAH MAY elect to obtain but which are not within the scope of the health IT s certification. For example, a separate PMS software to enable billing but not essential to meet Meaningful Use objectives and measures or to achieve any other use within the scope of the health IT s certification.. Page 5 of 9
6 Disclosure Attestation Letter Instructions Prior to issuing a certification, Drummond Group LLC (DG) must receive an attestation letter dated and signed by an authorized representative who has the legal authority to represent the company in such matters on formal company letter head stating the following: 1. The name of your organization and the product name and version seeking certification. 2. The exact disclosure language you will use for this certified product version. Please follow the rules and guidelines for this language described in this document. If this language is an update to a previously submitted disclosure attestation, please note this and the approximate date on which this new disclosure information will be in effect and displayed on your marketing materials. 3. If a self-developer of EHR technology claiming exclusion from mandatory disclosure requirements, submit this attestation that you are an EHR technology self-developer and your EHR technology will not be marketed or made commercially available for sale to health care providers. The below language from #4-6 must be included in this letter. EVERY ATTESTATION LETTER MUST INCLUDE LANGUAGE FROM 4-6: 4. Your agreement to notify DG of any and all future changes to your disclosure language for this certified product-version. 5. Your understanding and agreement that the ONC Health IT Certification Program Final Rule statement gives DG, as an ONC-ACB, the sole responsibility for ensuring compliance and determining appropriate consequences if EHR technology developers fail to disclose accurate information. 6. Your understanding and agreement that you will provide to DG copies of or be given access to any and all websites, marketing materials, communication statements, and other assertions made by your organization regarding the ONC certification status of your product in a reasonable time to ensure the disclosure information is being accurately disclosed. Document must be signed, scanned and sent to Melissa Martin, MelissaM@drummondgroup.com. The DG EHR Certification Body requires this attestation document before granting a certification on a product-version. Page 6 of 9
7 Examples of Mandatory Disclosures Some examples of certified products and attributed costs are given below. Examples 1, 2, 3, and 4 are pulled from the ONC Final Rule. Example #1 EHR technology is certified to the 314.e.1 view, download, and transmit to a 3 rd party certification criterion. However, EP must pay an ongoing monthly service fee to the EHR technology developer for it to host/administer this capability in order for the EP to meet the correlated MU objective and measure, the existence of this potential ongoing cost would need to be disclosed by the EHR technology developer. Example of Disclosure Language: This certified product-version may require ongoing monthly costs to support online patient service ( e.1). Example #2 An EHR Module is certified to the immunization registry transmission ( f.2), public health electronic lab reporting certification ( f.4) and transmission to cancer registries ( f.6) criteria. However, for the purposes of achieving MU, an EP, EH or CAH may be expected to pay a separate one-time fee for customizing the transmission interface development and configuration necessary for a state reporting agency. In addition the EHR technology developer charges a one-time fee to integrate its certified EHR technology with a hospital s other certified EHR Modules or a health information exchange organization. Example of Disclosure Language: This certified product-version may require one-time costs to establish interfaces for reporting to immunization registries, cancer registries, and public health agencies ( f.2, f.4, f.6). Support for integration of this certified product-version with other ONC certified systems may require additional one-time costs. Example #3 A Health IT Module is certified to 2014 Edition transitional of care certification criterion at (b)(1). The developer of the Health IT Module charges a yearly subscription fee for the use of the capability. In making the capability available, the developer bundles it with its own HISP. Because the developer is not a member of any trust network, users can only exchange transitions of care summaries with other users of the developer s own HISP and with users of third-party HISPs with which the developer has negotiated or is willing to negotiate a trust agreement. The developer also changes a transaction fee for each transitions of care summary sent of received via a third-party HISP (the transaction fee does not apply for transition of care summaries exchange among users of the developer s own HISP). Example of Disclosure Language: This certified product-version may require an annual subscription fee. For transitions of care summaries (b)(1) outside the product s HISP network, this certified product-version may require fees per transaction. Page 7 of 9
8 Example #4 EHR technology is certified to (b)(6) for Data Export to create a set of export summaries in real time base on a relative time and date. While the user can create a set of export summaries in real time based on relative time and date, this type of mass export is only allowed every 24 hours to reduce performance stress on the system. Example of Disclosure Language: This certified product-version is certified to Data Export criteria (B)(6) and can generate a set of export summaries in real time. However, the ability to utilize the mass export functionality for Data Export is only allowed every 24 hours to ensure optimal system performance. Page 8 of 9
9 {COMPANY LETTERHEAD} ATTN: Drummond Group, LLC North Hwy. 183 Suite B Austin, TX [Date] [Name of Organization] [Product Name-With-Version] For public release and exact language used for our website and marketing distributions: {Disclosure LANGUAGE: See instructions and examples} Additional Costs Contractual Obligations Technical or Practical Limitations This certified product-version may require (_additional costs ), ( obligations ), and ( technical and practical limitations ).. contractual We agree to notify Drummond Group of any and all future changes to our transparency and disclosures language for this certified product-version. We understand and agree that the ONC Health IT Certification Program Final Rule statement gives Drummond Group, as an ONC-ACB, the sole responsibility for ensuring compliance and determining appropriate consequences if EHR technology developers fail to divulge accurate transparency and disclosures information. We understand and agree that we will provide to Drummond Group copies of or give access to any and all websites, marketing materials, communication statements, and other assertions made by your organization regarding the ONC certification status of this product in a reasonable time to ensure the transparency and disclosures information is being accurately disclosed. [Signature Block of Authorized Senior Company Representative] [Name of Authorized Senior Company Representative] [Title of Company Representative] [Company Contact Information] Page 9 of 9
Drummond Group Inc. EHR Certification Guide. January 9, 2013
Drummond Group Inc. EHR Certification Guide January 9, 2013 Page 1 of 11 Section One. Overview of the Drummond Group EHR Certification Program ONC Authorized Certification Body: Drummond Group Inc. Drummond
More informationDrummond Certified Health IT Certificate and Marks Usage Requirements
Prepared & Administered by: DRUMMOND GROUP www.drummondgroup.com Page 1 of 7 Details about the Certificate of Compliance: The Drummond Group (DG) Certification Body shall issue an official document of
More informationDrummond Group LLC. EHR Certification Guide
Drummond Group LLC Page 1 of 12 Section One. Overview of the Drummond Group LLC EHR Certification Program ISO/IEC 17065 ONC Authorized Certification Body: Drummond Group LLC Drummond Group LLC (DG), approved
More informationCosts and Limitations Disclosure For MEDITECH s 2014 Edition Certified Products
Costs and Limitations Disclosure For MEDITECH s 2014 Edition Certified Products Prepared by Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) on May 2, 2016 1 Table of Contents: General Costs and Limitations
More informationDrummond Group, Inc. Re: Price Transparency Attestation
Drummond Group, Inc. Re: Price Transparency Attestation Organization: Criterions, LLC Product: Criterions EHR 3.0 Product Type: Complete EHR - Ambulatory Certification Number: A014E01O2Q8JEAB Certification
More informationPrice Transparency Attestation emr4md version 9.7 09/03/2014
Price Transparency Attestation emr4md version 9.7 09/03/2014 mednetmedical.com 1 Price Transparency Attestation Company Name: MedNet Medical Solutions Product Name: emr4md Version #: 9.7 mednetmedical.com
More informationCertificate of EHR Compliance
Coordinate 2.0 EHR Modular (Ambulatory) Modules Tested: 170.314(a)(14); 170.314(g)(2, 4) Holds Certificate No. 06192014 2580 5 Coordinate 2.0 EHR Modular (Inpatient) Modules Tested: 170.314(a)(14); 170.314(g)(4)
More informationStage 2 Medical Billing and reconciliation of Patients
Making Sense of Meaningful Use: Stage 2 1 Who are we? Purdue Healthcare Advisors (PHA)*, a business unit of Purdue University, specializes in affordable assistance to organizations that share our passion
More informationThe Meaning Behind Meaningful Use Stage 2
Meaningful Use White Paper The Meaning Behind Meaningful Use Stage 2 What You Need to Know pulseinc.com Meaningful Use Stage 2 Stage 2 of the Meaningful Use (MU) program officially began January 1, 2014.
More informationPrepared & Administered by: DRUMMOND GROUP LLC www.drummondgroup.com
Prepared & Administered by: DRUMMOND GROUP LLC www.drummondgroup.com Page 1 of 7 Details about the Certificate of Compliance: The Drummond Group LLC (DG) Certification Body shall issue an official document
More informationMeaningful Use the Role of Health Information Exchange (HIE)
Meaningful Use the Role of Health Information Exchange (HIE) Inland Empire Health Information Exchange IEHIE Dr. Richard Swafford, PhD Executive Director Inland Empire HIE Overview General Requirements
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: McKesson Patient Folder with
More informationMeaningful Use Stage 2. Meeting Meaningful Use Stage 2 with InstantPHR TM. www.getrealhealth.com
www.getrealhealth.com Meaningful Use Overview We are at the forefront of the patient engagement era. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 included the Health Information Technology for Economic
More informationWho are we? *Founded in 2005 by Purdue University, the Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, and the Indiana Hospital Association.
Who are we? Purdue Healthcare Advisors (PHA)*, a business unit of Purdue University, specializes in affordable assistance to organizations that share our passion for healthcare transformation. We bring
More informationCMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use
CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use Presenter: Sherry Wallace-Barnes, RN Envision Management Solutions, LLC 1 Meaningful Use 2015 Final
More informationEHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measures: 1 (Complete
More informationHHIE HIT Summit. July 27, 2013. What to Ask Your EHR Vendor About Meaningful Use Stage 2. Hawai i Health Information Exchange
HHIE HIT Summit July 27, 2013 What to Ask Your EHR Vendor About Meaningful Use Stage 2 Hawai i Health Information Exchange 1 Stage 2 Vendor Readiness Presented by: Roger Khlopin, HIT Consultant, Hawaii
More informationERC Incentive Program - Overview and Tips
Overview of the Medi-Cal EHR Incentive Program and Portal www.medi-cal.ehr.ca.gov November 29, 2011 What is it? Working with DHCS, Office of Health Information Technology on a secure, web based Provider
More informationEligible Professionals
Eligible Professionals How can the Georgia Health Information Network (GaHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements? The charts below define Stage 1 & Stage 2 Meaningful Use objectives associated
More informationThe Future of Meaningful Use
The Future of Meaningful Use Stage 3 Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager 2015 CORHIO All Rights Reserved CORHIO Proprietary Not For Redistribution 1 Agenda Stage 3
More information2. When will CPS 12 with reporting for Meaningful Use (MU) be generally available (GA)?
Centricity Practice Solution 12 and Centricity EMR 9.8 FAQ 1. When will we certify Centricity Practice Solution (CPS) 12, Centricity EMR (CEMR) 9.8 and reporting? Testing is complete. Both solutions were
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Business Intelligence Product
More informationMinnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs Updated November 2015 Glossary CAH Critical access hospitals CEHRT Certified electronic health record technology
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Product Version: v6.15 Domain:
More informationMEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW On September 4, 2012, CMS published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals (EHs)
More informationAchieving Meaningful Use in 2014. Presented by the SFREC
Achieving Meaningful Use in 2014 Presented by the SFREC About the SFREC HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK DBA South Florida Regional Extension Center Established in 2010 as part of the ARRA The mission of the SFREC
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Fusion RIS Extended Application
More informationMeaningful Use and Release of Information
Meaningful Use and Release of Information Understanding IOD s Role IOD Incorporated 1030 Ontario Road Green Bay, WI 54311 800.236.3355 iodincorporated.com INTRODUCTION According to HIMSS, Meaningful Use
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: MEDHOST Enterprise Product
More informationElectronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule Update September 6, 2012 Medical Assistance HIT Initiative 1 Introduction Timeframes Agenda Medicaid Eligibility Updates Stage 1 MU Optional
More informationInteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future
Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services designed Meaningful Use (MU) requirements to encourage healthcare
More informationMay 26, 2015. Attention: RIN 0991-AB93 Submitted electronically to: http://www.regulations.gov. Dear Dr. DeSalvo:
Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc. National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Attention: RIN 0991-AB93
More informationNavigating the Meaningful Use Jungle
Navigating the Meaningful Use Jungle Suzanne McEachron VITL ehealth Specialist smceachron@vitl.net Agenda Incentive/penalties timelines Brief review of Stage 1 with changes for 2014 Brief review of Stage
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Product Version: Domain:
More informationONC Regulations FAQs. Last updated: 9/21/10 Page 1 of 20
ONC Regulations FAQs Question [9-10-001-1]: What certification criteria will ONC-ATCBs use to certify EHR technology for purposes of the deeming provision of the Physician Self-Referral Prohibition and
More informationSummary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0
Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Compiled by: Sanjeev Tandon and Mark Jensen at CDC/OPHSS/CSELS/OD from the CMS & ONC Stage 2 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Meaningful
More informationModifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary
CY 2014 MPFS Final Rule Summary December 3, 2013 Page 1 Modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary SEPTEMBER 2014 Page 2 TABLE
More informationWhat GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF
What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF Disclosures Joel V. Brill, MD AGAF AGA Registry Executive
More informationCarolyn P. Hartley, MLA President, CEO Physicians EHR, Inc
Carolyn P. Hartley, MLA President, CEO Physicians EHR, Inc Health Information Management Professional SME to Regional Extension Centers President, CEO: Physicians EHR, Inc 140+ complex to risky EHR installations
More informationStage 2 Public Health Core Objective. Eligible Professionals
To demonstrate meaningful use under Stage 2 criteria EPs must meet 17 core objectives and 3 menu objectives that they select from a list of 6, for a total of 20 objectives. As with the previous stage,
More informationMeaningful Use Update
Meaningful Use Update AGENDA Quick Refresher on Meaningful Use Overview of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Audits 2 MEANINGFUL USE STAGES Stage 1 focus on data capture, getting the foundation in place Stage 2 focus
More informationNY Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Meaningful Use Public Health Reporting Eligible Professionals Scheduled for Stage 2 in 2015 www.emedny.org/meipass/publichealth December 2015 2 Agenda: 2015 MU Public Health Reporting - Stage 2 EPs EHR
More information[RIN 0991-AB82] Table of Contents
1 Summary of Final Rule Health Information Technology: Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition; Revisions to the Permanent
More information9/9/2015. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
More informationGE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Menu and Interfaces. Ray Bender, DPh, PMP Product Manager January 16, 2014
GE Healthcare Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Menu and Interfaces Ray Bender, DPh, PMP Product Manager January 16, 2014 Revised 20Jan2014 2014 General Electric Company All rights reserved. This does not constitute
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Merge Eye Care PACS Product
More informationONC HIT Certification Program
ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Medical and Practice Management
More informationStage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
More informationStage 2 EHR Incentive Programs Supporting Documentation For Audits Last Updated: February 2014
Stage 2 EHR Incentive Programs Supporting Documentation For Audits Last Updated: February 2014 Overview Providers who receive an EHR incentive payment for Stage 2 of the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive
More informationMay 7, 2012. Dear Dr. Mostashari:
McKesson Corporation One Post Street San Francisco, CA 94104-5296 Ann Richardson Berkey Senior Vice President, Public Affairs May 7, 2012 Farzad Mostashari, M.D., ScM. Director Office of the National Coordinator
More informationMEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 Summary of Proposed Rule (EP)
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 Summary of Proposed Rule (EP) The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) has been released and entered a 60-day comment period (March 7-May 6, 2012). HealthInsight
More informationWISHIN Comments Regarding CMS EHR Incentives Proposed Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives
CMS-0044-P: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2 WISHIN supports the overall goals of the Stage 2 requirements, as stated in Section II.A.3.a (Provisions of
More informationMeaningful Use and PCC EHR
Meaningful Use and PCC EHR (tim@pcc.com) Users Conference 2015 Agenda MU basics and eligibility How to participate in MU Stage 1 and Stage 2 MU requirements Using PCC EHR to meet stage 1 and stage 2 MU
More informationMedicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator Kim.davis@ahca.myflorida.com
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator Kim.davis@ahca.myflorida.com Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year
More informationEligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 7 of 17 Stage 2 Date issued: August, 2014
Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 7 of 17 Stage 2 Date issued: August, 2014 Patient Electronic Access Objective Measure Provide patients the ability to view online, download and
More informationEligible Professional Menu Measure Frequently Asked Questions
Eligible Professional Menu Measure Frequently Asked Questions Drug Formulary Checks 1. If an EP is unable to meet the measure of a meaningful use objective because it is outside of the scope of his or
More informationMeaningful Use and Dentrix Enterprise Lynne Hughston Regional Manager
Meaningful Use and Dentrix Enterprise Lynne Hughston Regional Manager AUTOMATED MEASURE CALCULATION Used to gather all needed information recorded to assist the provider in attesting to Meaningful Use
More informationAgenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Payment Program Review of Meaningful Use Stage 2 Regulation Changes and Other Impacts to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for 2014 that combines the effective
More informationProposed Rule Standards & Certification Criteria 2014 Edition. Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division
Proposed Rule Standards & Certification Criteria 2014 Edition Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division Agenda Regulatory History 2011 vs. 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
More informationCMS EHR Incentive Programs:
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
More informationMeaningful Use - The Basics
Meaningful Use - The Basics Presented by PaperFree Florida 1 Topics Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Barriers: Observations from the field Help and Questions 2 What is Meaningful Use Meaningful Use
More informationStage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
More informationStage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
More informationSummary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016. Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016
Image Research, LLC Christopher B. Sullivan, Ph.D. 2901 Quail Rise Court, Tallahassee, FL 32309 Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers
More informationPrivacy and Security Challenges of Meaningful Use
Privacy and Security Challenges of Meaningful Use Rich Cohan, MBA, FACHE, CHC, CCEP Adam H. Greene, JD, MPH DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and
More informationOf EHRs and Meaningful Use. Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS
Of EHRs and Meaningful Use Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS 1 MU: Where We are Today From www.cms.gov As of the end of January 31, 2013: >210,000 EPs
More informationOnly in growth, reform, and change, paradoxically enough, is true security to be found.
The Impact of ARRA/HITECH Stimulus, EMR/EHR Initiatives, and Meaningful Use on Laboratories Presented By: Curt Johnson Chief Operating Officer cjohnson@orchardsoft.com Orchard Symposium 2009 - Keynote
More informationMeaningful Use. 2015 2017 Stage 1 / 2 PRELIMINARY Revised Regulations May 2015
Meaningful Use 2015 2017 Stage 1 / 2 PRELIMINARY Revised Regulations May 2015 Logistic Announced April 10, 2015 Public Comments due by June 9, 2015 Final regulations by end of summer 2015 EH will be on
More informationMeaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits Presented by: Deb Anderson, CPHIMS HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (EHR)
More informationStage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
More informationTop 5 Things to Know About The 2014 Edition ONC HIT Certification Program. Rylla Riverman, RN, CISM, GEIT, CHCQM-Fellow Gorylla Inc.
Top 5 Things to Know About The 2014 Edition ONC HIT Certification Program Rylla Riverman, RN, CISM, GEIT, CHCQM-Fellow Gorylla Inc. Today s Agenda Understanding the Major Differences Between the 2011 Program
More informationPractical Guidance to Implement Meaningful Use Stage 2. Secure Health Transport for Certification and Meaningful Use
Practical Guidance to Implement Meaningful Use Stage 2 1. Introduction Association Standards and Interoperability Workgroup Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 introduces three transport standards for use in healthcare
More informationUnderstanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards
Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards Robert Snelick, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Sheryl Taylor, Booz-Allen Hamilton (BAH) Use of
More informationElectronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, 2015. Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee
Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, 2015 Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee Topics Payment Data Participation Years and Payments Meaningful Use Progression
More informationTABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET
CMS-0044-P 156 TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Use computerized provider
More informationPrivacy and Security: Meaningful Use in Healthcare Organizations
Privacy and Security: Meaningful Use in Healthcare Organizations Phyllis A. Patrick, MBA, FACHE, CHC July 20, 2011 Webinar Essentials 1. Session is currently being recorded, and will be available on our
More informationMEANINGFUL USE. stoltenberg consulting inc. Meeting Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements. simplifying healthcare technology. www.stoltenberg.
Meeting Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements No matter what form the final rule of Stage 2 MU takes, HCOs can t afford to bide their time Despite the growing number of MU attestations and the impressive
More informationEnabling Meaningful Use of EHR
A Saviance Technologies Whitepaper Enabling Meaningful Use of EHR The Meaningful Use Criteria Meaningful Use is defined as the use of certified EHR technology within healthcare settings in order to improve
More informationA Deep Dive Into MU Stage 2
A Deep Dive Into MU Stage 2 A Complimentary Webinar From healthsystemcio.com, Sponsored By Hyland Software, Developers of OnBase Your Line Will Be Silent Until Our Event Begins Thank You! Housekeeping
More informationChanges with MU Stage 2. Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management
Changes with MU Stage 2 Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management We give back EHR Concepts takes pride in giving our clients resourceful information to prepare you for the next steps
More informationMEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2
MEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2 OVERVIEW Meaningful Use is the third step in the journey to receive funds under the CMS EHR Incentive Programs. Meaningful Use (MU) is the utilization of certified electronic
More informationHealth Care February 28, 2012. CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
More informationMeaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
More informationEHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017 The requirements for Meaningful Use attestation have changed due to the recently released Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3
More informationReporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.
Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Attestation Worksheet for Stage 2 of the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program The Eligible Hospital and CAH Attestation Worksheet
More informationStage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015
Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015 Disclaimer» CMS must protect the rulemaking process and comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. During the
More informationInteroperability Testing and Certification. Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office
Interoperability Testing and Certification Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office Discussion Topics US National Institute of Standards & Technology American Recovery & Reinvestment
More informationThree Proposed Rules on EHRs:
Three Proposed Rules on EHRs: CMS 2015-2017 Modifications CMS Meaningful Use Stage 3 ONC s 2015 Edition Health IT (CEHRT) Lori Mihalich-Levin lmlevin@aamc.org Mary Wheatley mwheatley@aamc.org Ivy Baer
More informationMeaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
More informationNavigating Meaningful Use Stage 2
Navigating Meaningful Use Stage 2 Follow Justin Barnes @HITAdvisor Ask Questions & Follow Today s Conversation #askhit Justin T. Barnes VP, Greenway Medical Technologies Chairman Emeritus, EHR Association
More informationStage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
More informationProposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Proposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria Objectives and Measure Summary March 20, 2015 Provided by Clinical Architecture LLC Contents Overview... 3 Objective
More informationHow To Improve The Health Care System
What is the problem? Physicians are not IT professionals. Focused on seeing patients and meeting meaningful use requirements. Meaningful Use does not promote interoperability. Focused on capturing structured
More information8/20/2015. Meaningful Use Update 2015-2017 Notice of Proposed Rules
Meaningful Use Update 2015-2017 Notice of Proposed Rules 1 Overview of Proposed Rules CMS and ONC recently released notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) for the EHR Incentive Programs and the Certification
More informationEHR Incentive Programs Supporting Documentation For Audits Last Updated: February 2013
Overview EHR Incentive Programs Supporting Documentation For Audits Last Updated: February 2013 Providers who receive an EHR incentive payment for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
More informationSummary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only) Background Enacted on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery
More informationMichigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH Program Timeline Meaningful Use Timeline Meaningful Use Stages st year 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00 0 0 AIU $,50 3 TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 AIU
More informationMeaningful Use in a Nutshell
Meaningful Use in a Nutshell Compiled by Phyllis A. Patrick, MBA, FACHE, CHC January, 2011 Phyllis A. Patrick & Associates LLC phyllis@phyllispatrick.com MEANINGFUL USE Defining Meaningful Use Benefits
More information