Survival Analysis: Introduction

Transcription

1 Survival Analysis: Introduction Survival Analysis typically focuses on time to event data. In the most general sense, it consists of techniques for positivevalued random variables, such as time to death time to onset (or relapse) of a disease length of stay in a hospital duration of a strike money paid by health insurance viral load measurements time to finishing a doctoral dissertation! Kinds of survival studies include: clinical trials prospective cohort studies retrospective cohort studies retrospective correlative studies Typically, survival data are not fully observed, but rather are censored. 1

2 In this course, we will: describe survival data compare survival of several groups explain survival with covariates design studies with survival endpoints Some knowledge of discrete data methods will be useful, since analysis of the time to event uses information from the discrete (i.e., binary) outcome of whether the event occurred or not. Some useful references: Collett: Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research Cox and Oakes: Analysis of Survival Data Kalbfleisch and Prentice: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data Lee: Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis Fleming & Harrington: Counting Processes and Survival Analysis Hosmer & Lemeshow: Applied Survival Analysis Kleinbaum: Survival Analysis: A self-learning text 2

3 Klein & Moeschberger: Survival Analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data Cantor: Extending SAS Survival Analysis Techniques for Medical Research Allison: Survival Analysis Using the SAS System Jennison & Turnbull: Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials Ibrahim, Chen, & Sinha: Bayesian Survival Analysis 3

4 Some Definitions and notation Failure time random variables are always non-negative. That is, if we denote the failure time by T, then T 0. T can either be discrete (taking a finite set of values, e.g. a 1, a 2,..., a n ) or continuous (defined on (0, )). A random variable X is called a censored failure time random variable if X = min(t, U), where U is a nonnegative censoring variable. In order to define a failure time random variable, we need: (1) an unambiguous time origin (e.g. randomization to clinical trial, purchase of car) (2) a time scale (e.g. real time (days, years), mileage of a car) (3) definition of the event (e.g. death, need a new car transmission) 4

5 Illustration of survival data X X 2 2 X 2 X 2 study opens study closes 2 = censored observation X = event 5

6 The illustration of survival data on the previous page shows several features which are typically encountered in analysis of survival data: individuals do not all enter the study at the same time when the study ends, some individuals still haven t had the event yet other individuals drop out or get lost in the middle of the study, and all we know about them is the last time they were still free of the event The first feature is referred to as staggered entry The last two features relate to censoring of the failure time events. 6

7 Types of censoring: Right-censoring : only the r.v. X i = min(t i, U i ) is observed due to loss to follow-up drop-out study termination We call this right-censoring because the true unobserved event is to the right of our censoring time; i.e., all we know is that the event has not happened at the end of follow-up. In addition to observing X i, we also get to see the failure indicator: 1 if T δ i = i U i 0 if T i > U i Some software packages instead assume we have a censoring indicator: c i = 0 if T i U i 1 if T i > U i Right-censoring is the most common type of censoring assumption we will deal with in survival analysis. 7

8 Left-censoring Can only observe Y i = max(t i, U i ) and the failure indicators: 1 if U δ i = i T i 0 if U i > T i e.g. (Miller) study of age at which African children learn a task. Some already knew (left-censored), some learned during study (exact), some had not yet learned by end of study (right-censored). Interval-censoring Observe (L i, R i ) where T i (L i, R i ) Ex. 1: Time to prostate cancer, observe longitudinal PSA measurements Ex. 2: Time to undetectable viral load in AIDS studies, based on measurements of viral load taken at each clinic visit Ex. 3: Detect recurrence of colon cancer after surgery. Follow patients every 3 months after resection of primary tumor. 8

9 Independent vs informative censoring We say censoring is independent (non-informative) if U i is independent of T i. Ex. 1 If U i is the planned end of the study (say, 2 years after the study opens), then it is usually independent of the event times. Ex. 2 If U i is the time that a patient drops out of the study because he/she got much sicker and/or had to discontinue taking the study treatment, then U i and T i are probably not independent. An individual censored at U should be representative of all subjects who survive to U. This means that censoring at U could depend on prognostic characteristics measured at baseline, but that among all those with the same baseline characteristics, the probability of censoring prior to or at time U should be the same. Censoring is considered informative if the distribution of U i contains any information about the parameters characterizing the distribution of T i. 9

10 Suppose we have a sample of observations on n people: (T 1, U 1 ), (T 2, U 2 ),..., (T n, U n ) There are three main types of (right) censoring times: Type I: All the U i s are the same e.g. animal studies, all animals sacrificed after 2 years Type II: U i = T (r), the time of the rth failure. e.g. animal studies, stop when 4/6 have tumors Type III: the U i s are random variables, δ i s are failure indicators: δ i = 1 if T i U i 0 if T i > U i Type I and Type II are called singly censored data, Type III is called randomly censored (or sometimes progressively censored). 10

11 Some example datasets: Example A. Duration of nursing home stay (Morris et al., Case Studies in Biometry, Ch 12) The National Center for Health Services Research studied 36 for-profit nursing homes to assess the effects of different financial incentives on length of stay. Treated nursing homes received higher per diems for Medicaid patients, and bonuses for improving a patient s health and sending them home. Study included 1601 patients admitted between May 1, 1981 and April 30, Variables include: LOS - Length of stay of a resident (in days) AGE - Age of a resident RX - Nursing home assignment (1:bonuses, 0:no bonuses) GENDER - Gender (1:male, 0:female) MARRIED - (1: married, 0:not married) HEALTH - health status (2:second best, 5:worst) CENSOR - Censoring indicator (1:censored, 0:discharged) First few lines of data:

12 Example B. Fecundability Women who had recently given birth were asked to recall how long it took them to become pregnant, and whether or not they smoked during that time. The outcome of interest (summarized below) is time to pregnancy (measured in menstrual cycles). 19 subjects were not able to get pregnant after 12 months. Cycle Smokers Non-smokers

13 Example C: MAC Prevention Clinical Trial ACTG 196 was a randomized clinical trial to study the effects of combination regimens on prevention of MAC (mycobacterium avium complex), one of the most common opportunistic infections in AIDS patients. The treatment regimens were: clarithromycin (new) rifabutin (standard) clarithromycin plus rifabutin Other characteristics of trial: Patients enrolled between April 1993 and February 1994 Follow-up ended August 1995 In February 1994, rifabutin dosage was reduced from 3 pills/day (450mg) to 2 pills/day (300mg) due to concern over uveitis 1 The main intent-to-treat analysis compared the 3 treatment arms without adjusting for this change in dosage. 1Uveitis is an adverse experience resulting in inflammation of the uveal tract in the eyes (about 3-4% of patients reported uveitis). 13

14 Example D: HMO Study of HIV-related Survival This is hypothetical data used by Hosmer & Lemeshow (described on pages 2-17) containing 100 observations on HIV+ subjects belonging to an Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). The HMO wants to evaluate the survival time of these subjects. In this hypothetical dataset, subjects were enrolled from January 1, 1989 until December 31, Study follow up then ended on December 31, Variables: ID Subject ID (1-100) TIME Survival time in months ENTDATE Entry date ENDDATE Date follow-up ended due to death or censoring CENSOR Death Indicator (1=death, 0=censor) AGE Age of subject in years DRUG History of IV Drug Use (0=no,1=yes) This dataset is used by Hosmer & Lemeshow to motivate some concepts in survival analysis in Chap. 1 of their book. 14

15 Example E: UMARU Impact Study (UIS) This dataset comes from the University of Massachusetts AIDS Research Unit (UMARU) IMPACT Study, a 5-year collaborative research project comprised of two concurrent randomized trials of residential treatment for drug abuse. (1) Program A: Randomized 444 subjects to a 3- or 6- month program of health education and relapse prevention. Clients were taught to recognize high-risk situations that are triggers to relapse, and taught skills to cope with these situations without using drugs. (2) Program B: Randomized 184 participants to a 6- or 12-month program with highly structured life-style in a communal living setting. Variables: ID Subject ID (1-628) AGE Age in years BECKTOTA Beck Depression Score HERCOC Heroin or Cocaine Use prior to entry IVHX IV Drug use at Admission NDRUGTX Number previous drug treatments RACE Subject s Race (0=White, 1=Other) TREAT Treatment Assignment (0=short, 1=long) SITE Treatment Program (0=A,1=B) LOT Length of Treatment (days) TIME Time to Return to Drug Use (days) CENSOR Indicator of Drug Use Relapse (1=yes,0=censored) 15

16 Example F: Atlantic Halibut Survival Times One conservation measure suggested for trawl fishing is a minimum size limit for halibut (32 inches). However, this size limit would only be effective if captured fish below the limit survived until the time of their release. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the survival rates of halibut caught by trawls or longlines, and to assess other factors which might contribute to survival (duration of trawling, maximum depth fished, size of fish, and handling time). An article by Smith, Waiwood and Neilson, Survival Analysis for Size Regulation of Atlantic Halibut in Case Studies in Biometry compares parametric survival models to semiparametric survival models in evaluating this data. Survival Tow Diff Length Handling Total Obs Time Censoring Duration in of Fish Time log(catch) # (min) Indicator (min.) Depth (cm) (min.) ln(weight)

17 More Definitions and Notation There are several equivalent ways to characterize the probability distribution of a survival random variable. Some of these are familiar; others are special to survival analysis. We will focus on the following terms: The density function f(t) The survivor function S(t) The hazard function λ(t) The cumulative hazard function Λ(t) Density function (or Probability Mass Function) for discrete r.v. s Suppose that T takes values in a 1, a 2,..., a n. f(t) = P r(t = t) = f j if t = a j, j = 1, 2,..., n 0 if t a j, j = 1, 2,..., n Density Function for continuous r.v. s f(t) = lim t 0 1 P r(t T t + t) t 17

18 Survivorship Function: S(t) = P (T t). In other settings, the cumulative distribution function, F (t) = P (T t), is of interest. In survival analysis, our interest tends to focus on the survival function, S(t). Notes: For a continuous random variable: S(t) = f(u)du t For a discrete random variable: S(t) = u t f(u) = a j t = f j a j t f(a j ) From the definition of S(t) for a continuous variable, S(t) = 1 F (t) as long as F (t) is absolutely continuous w.r.t the Lebesgue measure. [That is, F (t) has a density function.] For a discrete variable, we have to decide what to do if an event occurs exactly at time t; i.e., does that become part of F (t) or S(t)? To get around this problem, several books define S(t) = P r(t > t), or else define F (t) = P r(t < t) (eg. Collett) 18

19 Hazard Function λ(t) Sometimes called an instantaneous failure rate, the force of mortality, or the age-specific failure rate. Continuous random variables: λ(t) = lim t 0 = lim t 0 = lim t 0 = f(t) S(t) 1 P r(t T < t + t T t) t 1 t 1 t P r([t T < t + t] P r(t t) P r(t T < t + t) P r(t t) Discrete random variables: λ(a j ) λ j = P r(t = a j T a j ) = P (T = a j) P (T a j ) = f(a j) S(a j ) = f(t) k:ak a j f(a k ) [T t]) 19

20 Cumulative Hazard Function Λ(t) Continuous random variables: Λ(t) = t 0 λ(u)du Discrete random variables: Λ(t) = λ k k:a k <t 20

21 Relationship between S(t) and λ(t) We ve already shown that, for a continuous r.v. λ(t) = f(t) S(t) For a left-continuous survivor function S(t), we can show: f(t) = S (t) or S (t) = f(t) We can use this relationship to show that: d dt [log S(t)] = 1 S (t) S(t) = f(t) S(t) = f(t) S(t) So another way to write λ(t) is as follows: λ(t) = d [log S(t)] dt 21

22 Relationship between S(t) and Λ(t): Continuous case: Discrete case: Λ(t) = t 0 λ(u)du = t 0 f(u) S(u) du = t d log S(u)du 0 du = log S(t) + log S(0) S(t) = e Λ(t) Suppose that a j < t a j+1. Then S(t) = P (T a 1, T a 2,..., T a j+1 ) = P (T a 1 )P (T a 2 T a 1 ) P (T a j+1 T a j ) = (1 λ 1 ) (1 λ j ) = k:a k <t (1 λ k ) Cox defines Λ(t) = k:a k <t log(1 λ k ) so that S(t) = e Λ(t) in the discrete case, as well. 22

23 Measuring Central Tendency in Survival Mean survival - call this µ µ = 0 uf(u)du for continuous T = n j=1 a j f j for discrete T Median survival - call this τ, is defined by S(τ) = 0.5 Similarly, any other percentile could be defined. In practice, we don t usually hit the median survival at exactly one of the failure times. In this case, the estimated median survival is the smallest time τ such that Ŝ(τ)

24 Some hazard shapes seen in applications: increasing e.g. aging after 65 decreasing e.g. survival after surgery bathtub e.g. age-specific mortality constant e.g. survival of patients with advanced chronic disease 24

25 Estimating the survival or hazard function We can estimate the survival (or hazard) function in two ways: by specifying a parametric model for λ(t) based on a particular density function f(t) by developing an empirical estimate of the survival function (i.e., non-parametric estimation) If no censoring: The empirical estimate of the survival function, S(t), is the proportion of individuals with event times greater than t. With censoring: If there are censored observations, then S(t) is not a good estimate of the true S(t), so other non-parametric methods must be used to account for censoring (life-table methods, Kaplan-Meier estimator) 25

26 Some Parametric Survival Distributions The Exponential distribution (1 parameter) f(t) = λe λt for t 0 S(t) = f(u)du t = e λt λ(t) = f(t) S(t) = λ constant hazard! Λ(t) = t 0 λ(u) du = t 0 λ du = λt Check: Does S(t) = e Λ(t)? median: solve 0.5 = S(τ) = e λτ : mean: τ = log(0.5) λ 0 uλe λu du = 1 λ 26

27 The Weibull distribution (2 parameters) Generalizes exponential: S(t) = e λtκ f(t) = d dt S(t) = κλtκ 1 e λtκ λ(t) = κλt κ 1 Λ(t) = t 0 λ(u)du = λtκ λ - the scale parameter κ - the shape parameter The Weibull distribution is convenient because of its simple form. It includes several hazard shapes: κ = 1 constant hazard 0 < κ < 1 decreasing hazard κ > 1 increasing hazard 27

28 Rayleigh distribution Another 2-parameter generalization of exponential: λ(t) = λ 0 + λ 1 t compound exponential T exp(λ), λ g f(t) = 0 λe λt g(λ)dλ log-normal, log-logistic: Possible distributions for T obtained by specifying for log T any convenient family of distributions, e.g. log T normal (non-monotone hazard) log T logistic 28

29 Why use one versus another? technical convenience for estimation and inference explicit simple forms for f(t), S(t), and λ(t). qualitative shape of hazard function One can usually distinguish between a one-parameter model (like the exponential) and two-parameter (like Weibull or log-normal) in terms of the adequacy of fit to a dataset. Without a lot of data, it may be hard to distinguish between the fits of various 2-parameter models (i.e., Weibull vs lognormal) 29

30 Plots of estimates of S(t) Based on KM, exponential, Weibull, and log-normal for study of protease inhibitors in AIDS patients (ACTG 320) KM Curves for Time to PCP - 2 Drug Arm KM Curves for Time to PCP - 3 Drug Arm Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal days days 30

31 Plots of estimates of S(t) Based on KM, exponential, Weibull, and log-normal for study of protease inhibitors in AIDS patients (ACTG 320) KM Curves for Time to MAC - 2 Drug Arm KM Curves for Time to MAC - 3 Drug Arm Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal days days 31

32 Plots of estimates of S(t) Based on KM, exponential, Weibull, and log-normal for study of protease inhibitors in AIDS patients (ACTG 320) KM Curves for Time to CMV - 2 Drug Arm KM Curves for Time to CMV - 3 Drug Arm Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal Probability KM Exponential Weibull Lognormal days days 32

33 Preview of Coming Attractions Next we will discuss the most famous non-parametric approach for estimating the survival distribution, called the Kaplan-Meier estimator. To motivate the derivation of this estimator, we will first consider a set of survival times where there is no censoring. The following are times to relapse (weeks) for 21 leukemia patients receiving control treatment (Table 1.1 of Cox & Oakes): 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 8, 8, 8, 8, 11, 11, 12, 12, 15, 17, 22, 23 How would we estimate S(10), the probability that an individual survives to time 10 or later? What about S(8)? Is it or 8 21? 33

34 Let s construct a table of S(t): Values of t Ŝ(t) t 1 21/21= < t 2 19/21= < t 3 17/21= < t 4 4 < t 5 5 < t 8 8 < t < t < t < t < t < t 23 Empirical Survival Function: When there is no censoring, the general formula is: S(t) = # individuals with T t total sample size 34

35 In most software packages, the survival function is evaluated just after time t, i.e., at t +. In this case, we only count the individuals with T > t. Example for leukemia data (control arm): 35

36 Stata Commands for Survival Estimation.use leukem.stset remiss status if trt==0 (21 observations deleted) (to keep only untreated patients). sts list failure _d: analysis time _t: status remiss Beg. Net Survivor Std. Time Total Fail Lost Function Error [95% Conf. Int.] sts graph 36

37 SAS Commands for Survival Estimation data leuk; input t; cards; ; proc lifetest data=leuk; time t; run; 37

38 SAS Output for Survival Estimation The LIFETEST Procedure Product-Limit Survival Estimates Survival Standard Number Number t Survival Failure Error Failed Left

39 SAS Output for Survival Estimation (cont d) Summary Statistics for Time Variable t Quartile Estimates Point 95% Confidence Interval Percent Estimate [Lower Upper) Mean Standard Error Summary of the Number of Censored and Uncensored Values Percent Total Failed Censored Censored

40 Does anyone have a guess regarding how to calculate the standard error of the estimated survival? Ŝ(8 + ) = P (T > 8) = 8 21 = (at t = 8 +, we count the 4 events at time=8 as already having failed) se[ŝ(8+ )] =

41 S-Plus Commands for Survival Estimation > t_c(1,1,2,2,3,4,4,5,5,8,8,8,8,11,11,12,12,15,17,22,23) > surv.fit(t,status=rep(1,21)) 95 percent confidence interval is of type "log" time n.risk n.event survival std.dev lower 95% CI upper 95% CI NA NA NA 41

42 Estimating the Survival Function One-sample nonparametric methods: We will consider three methods for estimating a survivorship function S(t) = P r(t t) without resorting to parametric methods: (1) Kaplan-Meier (2) Life-table (Actuarial Estimator) (3) via the Cumulative hazard estimator 42

43 (1) The Kaplan-Meier Estimator The Kaplan-Meier (or KM) estimator is probably the most popular approach. It can be justified from several perspectives: product limit estimator likelihood justification redistribute to the right estimator We will start with an intuitive motivation based on conditional probabilities, then review some of the other justifications. 43

44 Motivation: First, consider an example where there is no censoring. The following are times of remission (weeks) for 21 leukemia patients receiving control treatment (Table 1.1 of Cox & Oakes): 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 8, 8, 8, 8, 11, 11, 12, 12, 15, 17, 22, 23 How would we estimate S(10), the probability that an individual survives to time 10 or later? What about S(8)? Is it or 8 21? Let s construct a table of S(t): Values of t Ŝ(t) t 1 21/21= < t 2 19/21= < t 3 17/21= < t 4 4 < t 5 5 < t 8 8 < t < t < t < t < t < t 23 44

45 Empirical Survival Function: When there is no censoring, the general formula is: S(t) = # individuals with T t total sample size Example for leukemia data (control arm): 45

46 What if there is censoring? Consider the treated group from Table 1.1 of Cox and Oakes: 6 +, 6, 6, 6, 7, 9 +, 10 +, 10, 11 +, 13, 16, , 20 +, 22, 23, 25 +, 32 +, 32 +, 34 +, 35 + [Note: times with + are right censored] We know S(6)= 21/21, because everyone survived at least until time 6 or greater. But, we can t say S(7) = 17/21, because we don t know the status of the person who was censored at time 6. In a 1958 paper in the Journal of the American Statistical Association, Kaplan and Meier proposed a way to nonparametrically estimate S(t), even in the presence of censoring. The method is based on the ideas of conditional probability. 46

47 A quick review of conditional probability: Conditional Probability: Suppose A and B are two events. Then, P (A B) P (A B) = P (B) Multiplication law of probability: can be obtained from the above relationship, by multiplying both sides by P (B): P (A B) = P (A B) P (B) Extension to more than 2 events: Suppose A 1, A 2...A k are k different events. Then, the probability of all k events happening together can be written as a product of conditional probabilities: P (A 1 A 2... A k ) = P (A k A k 1... A 1 ) P (A k 1 A k 2... A 1 )... P (A 2 A 1 ) P (A 1 ) 47

48 Now, let s apply these ideas to estimate S(t): Suppose a k < t a k+1. Then S(t) = P (T a k+1 ) = P (T a 1, T a 2,..., T a k+1 ) = P (T a 1 ) k j=1 P (T a j+1 T a j ) = k j=1 = k j=1 so Ŝ(t) = k j=1 = j:a j <t [1 P (T = a j T a j )] [1 λ j ] 1 d j r j 1 d j r j d j is the number of deaths at a j r j is the number at risk at a j 48

49 Intuition behind the Kaplan-Meier Estimator Think of dividing the observed timespan of the study into a series of fine intervals so that there is a separate interval for each time of death or censoring: D C C D D D Using the law of conditional probability, P r(t t) = j P r(survive j-th interval I j survived to start of I j ) where the product is taken over all the intervals including or preceding time t. 49

50 4 possibilities for each interval: (1) No events (death or censoring) - conditional probability of surviving the interval is 1 (2) Censoring - assume they survive to the end of the interval, so that the conditional probability of surviving the interval is 1 (3) Death, but no censoring - conditional probability of not surviving the interval is # deaths (d) divided by # at risk (r) at the beginning of the interval. So the conditional probability of surviving the interval is 1 (d/r). (4) Tied deaths and censoring - assume censorings last to the end of the interval, so that conditional probability of surviving the interval is still 1 (d/r) General Formula for jth interval: It turns out we can write a general formula for the conditional probability of surviving the j-th interval that holds for all 4 cases: 1 d j r j 50

51 We could use the same approach by grouping the event times into intervals (say, one interval for each month), and then counting up the number of deaths (events) in each to estimate the probability of surviving the interval (this is called the lifetable estimate). However, the assumption that those censored last until the end of the interval wouldn t be quite accurate, so we would end up with a cruder approximation. As the intervals get finer and finer, the approximations made in estimating the probabilities of getting through each interval become smaller and smaller, so that the estimator converges to the true S(t). This intuition clarifies why an alternative name for the KM is the product limit estimator. 51

52 The Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function (or survival probability) S(t) = P r(t t) is: Ŝ(t) = j:τ j <t r j d j = j:τ j <t r j 1 d j r j where τ 1,...τ K is the set of K distinct death times observed in the sample d j is the number of deaths at τ j r j is the number of individuals at risk right before the j-th death time (everyone dead or censored at or after that time). c j is the number of censored observations between the j-th and (j + 1)-st death times. Censorings tied at τ j are included in c j Note: two useful formulas are: (1) r j = r j 1 d j 1 c j 1 (2) r j = (c l + d l ) l j 52

53 Calculating the KM - Cox and Oakes example Make a table with a row for every death or censoring time: τ j d j c j r j 1 (d j /r j ) Ŝ(τ j + ) = Note that: Ŝ(t+ ) only changes at death (failure) times Ŝ(t+ ) is 1 up to the first death time Ŝ(t+ ) only goes to 0 if the last event is a death 53

54 KM plot for treated leukemia patients Note: most statistical software packages summarize the KM survival function at τ + j, i.e., just after the time of the j-th failure. In other words, they provide Ŝ(τ + j ). When there is no censoring, the empirical survival estimate would then be: S(t + # individuals with T > t ) = total sample size 54

55 Output from STATA KM Estimator: failure time: failure/censor: weeks remiss Beg. Net Survivor Std. Time Total Fail Lost Function Error [95% Conf. Int.]

56 Two Other Justifications for KM Estimator I. Likelihood-based derivation (Cox and Oakes) For a discrete failure time variable, define: d j r j λ j number of failures at a j number of individuals at risk at a j (including those censored at a j ). Pr(death) in j-th interval (conditional on survival to start of interval) The likelihood is that of g independent binomials: L(λ) = g j=1 λ d j j (1 λ j ) r j d j Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimator of λ j is: ˆλ j = d j /r j Now we plug in the MLE s of λ to estimate S(t): Ŝ(t) = j:a j <t (1 ˆλ j ) = j:a j <t 1 d j r j 56

57 II. Redistribute to the right justification (Efron, 1967) In the absence of censoring, Ŝ(t) is just the proportion of individuals with T t. The idea behind Efron s approach is to spread the contributions of censored observations out over all the possible times to their right. Algorithm: Step (1): arrange the n observed times (deaths or censorings) in increasing order. If there are ties, put censored after deaths. Step (2): Assign weight (1/n) to each time. Step (3): Moving from left to right, each time you encounter a censored observation, distribute its mass to all times to its right. Step (4): Calculate Ŝj by subtracting the final weight for time j from Ŝj 1 57

58 Example of redistribute to the right algorithm Consider the following event times: 2, 2.5+, 3, 3, 4, 4.5+, 5, 6, 7 The algorithm goes as follows: (Step 1) (Step 4) Times Step 2 Step 3a Step 3b Ŝ(τ j ) 2 1/9= /9= /9= /9= /9= /9= /9= /9= This comes out the same as the product limit approach. 58

59 Properties of the KM estimator In the case of no censoring: Ŝ(t) = S(t) # deaths at t or greater = n where n is the number of individuals in the study. This is just like an estimated probability from a binomial distribution, so we have: Ŝ(t) N (S(t), S(t)[1 S(t)]/n) How does censoring affect this? Ŝ(t) is still approximately normal The mean of Ŝ(t) converges to the true S(t) The variance is a bit more complicated (since the denominator n includes some censored observations). Once we get the variance, then we can construct (pointwise) (1 α)% confidence intervals (NOT bands) about Ŝ(t): Ŝ(t) ± z 1 α/2 se[ŝ(t)] 59

60 Greenwood s formula (Collett 2.1.3) We can think of the KM estimator as Ŝ(t) = j:τ j <t (1 ˆλ j ) where ˆλ j = d j /r j. Since the ˆλ j s are just binomial proportions, we can apply standard likelihood theory to show that each ˆλ j is approximately normal, with mean the true λ j, and var(ˆλ j ) ˆλ j (1 ˆλ j ) r j Also, the ˆλ j s are independent in large enough samples. Since Ŝ(t) is a function of the λ j s, we can estimate its variance using the delta method: Delta method: If Y is normal with mean µ and variance σ 2, then g(y ) is approximately normally distributed with mean g(µ) and variance [g (µ)] 2 σ 2. 60

61 Two specific examples of the delta method: (A) Z = log(y ) then Z N log(µ), 1 µ 2 σ 2 (B) Z = exp(y ) then Z N [ e µ, [e µ ] 2 σ 2] The examples above use the following results from calculus: d dx log u = 1 u du dx d dx eu = e u du dx 61

62 Greenwood s formula (continued) Instead of dealing with Ŝ(t) directly, we will look at its log: log[ŝ(t)] = j:τ j <t log(1 ˆλ j ) Thus, by approximate independence of the ˆλ j s, var(log[ŝ(t)]) = j:τ j <t by (A) = j:τ j <t = j:τ j <t var[log(1 ˆλ j )] ˆλ var(ˆλ j ) j 1 1 ˆλ 2 ˆλj (1 ˆλ j )/r j j = j:τ j <t = j:τ j <t ˆλ j (1 ˆλ j )r j d j (r j d j )r j Now, Ŝ(t) = exp[log[ŝ(t)]]. Thus by (B), var(ŝ(t)) = [Ŝ(t)]2 var [ log[ŝ(t)]] Greenwood s Formula: var(ŝ(t)) = [Ŝ(t)]2 j:τ j <t d j (r j d j )r j 62

63 Back to confidence intervals For a 95% confidence interval, we could use where Ŝ(t) ± z 1 α/2 se[ŝ(t)] se[ŝ(t)] is calculated using Greenwood s formula. Problem: This approach can yield values > 1 or < 0. Better approach: Get a 95% confidence interval for L(t) = log( log(s(t))) Since this quantity is unrestricted, the confidence interval will be in the proper range when we transform back. To see why this works, note the following: Since Ŝ(t) is an estimated probability 0 Ŝ(t) 1 Taking the log of Ŝ(t) has bounds: log[ŝ(t)] 0 Taking the opposite: 0 log[ŝ(t)] Taking the log again: log [ log[ŝ(t)]] To transform back, reverse steps with S(t) = exp( exp(l(t)) 63

64 Log-log Approach for Confidence Intervals: (1) Define L(t) = log( log(s(t))) (2) Form a 95% confidence interval for L(t) based on ˆL(t), yielding [ ˆL(t) A, ˆL(t) + A] (3) Since S(t) = exp( exp(l(t)), the confidence bounds for the 95% CI on S(t) are: [exp( e (ˆL(t)+A) ), exp( e (ˆL(t) A) )] (note that the upper and lower bounds switch) (4) Substituting ˆL(t) = log( log(ŝ(t))) back into the above bounds, we get confidence bounds of ([Ŝ(t)]eA, [Ŝ(t)]e A ) 64

65 What is A? A is 1.96 se( ˆL(t)) To calculate this, we need to calculate var( ˆL(t)) = var [ log( log(ŝ(t)))] From our previous calculations, we know var(log[ŝ(t)]) = j:τ j <t d j (r j d j )r j Applying the delta method as in example (A), we get: var( ˆL(t)) = var(log( log[ŝ(t)])) 1 d j = [log Ŝ(t)]2 j:τ j <t (r j d j )r j We take the square root of the above to get se( ˆL(t)), and then form the confidence intervals as: e±1.96 se(ˆl(t)) Ŝ(t) This is the approach that Stata uses. Splus gives an option to calculate these bounds (use conf.type= log-log in surv.fit). 65

66 Summary of Confidence Intervals on S(t) Calculate Ŝ(t) ± 1.96 se[ŝ(t)] where se[ŝ(t)] is calculated using Greenwood s formula, and replace negative lower bounds by 0 and upper bounds greater than 1 by 1. Recommended by Collett This is the default using SAS not very satisfactory Use a log transformation to stabilize the variance and allow for non-symmetric confidence intervals. This is what is normally done for the confidence interval of an estimated odds ratio. Use var[log(ŝ(t))] = d j j:τ j <t (r j d j )r j already calculated as part of Greenwood s formula This is the default in Splus Use the log-log transformation just described Somewhat complicated, but always yields proper bounds This is the default in Stata. 66

67 Software for Kaplan-Meier Curves Stata - stset and sts commands SAS - proc lifetest Splus - surv.fit(time,status) Defaults for Confidence Interval Calculations Stata - log-log ˆL(t) ± 1.96 se[ ˆL(t)] where L(t) = log[ log(s(t))] SAS - plain Ŝ(t) ± 1.96 se[ŝ(t)] Splus - log log S(t) ± 1.96 se[log(ŝ(t))] but Splus will also give either of the other two options if you request them. 67

68 Stata Commands Create a file called leukemia.dat with the raw data, with a column for treatment, weeks to relapse (i.e., duration of remission), and relapse status:.infile trt remiss status using leukemia.dat.stset remiss status.sts list.sts graph, saving(kmtrt).graph using kmtrt (sets up a failure time dataset, with failtime status in that order, type help stset to get details) (estimated S(t), se[s(t)], and 95% CI) (creates a Kaplan-Meier plot, and saves the plot in file kmtrt.gph, type help gphdot to get some printing instructions) (redisplays the graph at any later time) If the dataset has already been created and loaded into Stata, then you can substitute the following commands for initializing the data:.use leukem.describe.stset remiss status.stdes (finds Stata dataset leukem.dta) (provides a description of the dataset) (declares data to be failure type) (gives a description of the survival dataset) 68

69 STATA Output for Treated Leukemia Patients:.use leukem.stset remiss status if trt==1.sts list failure time: failure/censor: remiss status Beg. Net Survivor Std. Time Total Fail Lost Function Error [95% Conf. Int.]

70 SAS Commands for Kaplan Meier Estimator - PROC LIFETEST The SAS command for the Kaplan-Meier estimate is: or time failtime*censor(1); time failtime*failind(0); The first variable is the failure time, and the second is the failure or censoring indicator. In parentheses you need to put the specific numeric value that corresponds to censoring. The upper and lower confidence limits on Ŝ(t) are included in the data set OUTSURV when specified. The upper and lower limits are called: sdf ucl, sdf lcl. data leukemia; input weeks remiss; label weeks= Time to Remission (in weeks) remiss= Remission indicator (1=yes,0=no) ; cards; ( lines edited out here) ; proc lifetest data=leukemia outsurv=confint; time weeks*remiss(0); title Leukemia data from Table 1.1 of Cox and Oakes ; run; proc print data=confint; title 95% Confidence Intervals for Estimated Survival ; 70

71 Output from SAS Proc Lifetest Note: this information is not printed if you use NOPRINT. Leukemia data from Table 1.1 of Cox and Oakes The LIFETEST Procedure Product-Limit Survival Estimates Survival Standard Number Number WEEKS Survival Failure Error Failed Left * * * * * * * * * * * * * Censored Observation 71

72 Output from printing the CONFINT file 95% Confidence Intervals for Estimated Survival OBS WEEKS _CENSOR_ SURVIVAL SDF_LCL SDF_UCL The output dataset will have one observation for each unique combination of weeks and censor. It will also add an observation for failure time equal to 0. 72

73 Splus Commands Create a file called leukemia.dat with the variables names in the first row, as follows: t c etc... In Splus, type y_read.table( leukemia.dat,header=t) surv.fit(y$t,y$c) plot(surv.fit(y$t,y$c)) (the plot command will also yield 95% confidence intervals) To specify the type of confidence intervals, use the conf.type= option in the surv.fit statements: e.g. conf.type= log-log or conf.type= plain 73

74 >surv.fit(y$t,y$c) 95 percent confidence interval is of type "log" time n.risk n.event survival std.dev lower 95% CI upper 95% CI > surv.fit(y$t,y$c,conf.type="log-log") 95 percent confidence interval is of type "log-log" time n.risk n.event survival std.dev lower 95% CI upper 95% CI > surv.fit(y$t,y$c,conf.type="plain") 95 percent confidence interval is of type "plain" time n.risk n.event survival std.dev lower 95% CI upper 95% CI

75 KM Survival Estimate and Confidence intervals (SPlus) Survival Time 75

76 Means, Medians, Quantiles based on the KM Mean: k j=1 τ j P r(t = τ j ) Median - by definition, this is the time, τ, such that S(τ) = 0.5. However, in practice, it is defined as the smallest time such that Ŝ(τ) 0.5. The median is more appropriate for censored survival data than the mean. For the treated leukemia patients, we find: Ŝ(22) = Ŝ(23) = The median is thus 23. This can also be seen visually on the graph to the left. Lower quartile (25 th percentile): the smallest time (LQ) such that Ŝ(LQ) 0.75 Upper quartile (75 th percentile): the smallest time (UQ) such that Ŝ(UQ)

77 The (2) Lifetable Estimator of Survival: We said that we would consider the following three methods for estimating a survivorship function S(t) = P r(t t) without resorting to parametric methods: (1) Kaplan-Meier (2) = Life-table (Actuarial Estimator) (3) = Cumulative hazard estimator 77

78 (2) The Lifetable or Actuarial Estimator one of the oldest techniques around used by actuaries, demographers, etc. applies when the data are grouped Our goal is still to estimate the survival function, hazard, and density function, but this is complicated by the fact that we don t know exactly when during each time interval an event occurs. 78

79 Lee (section 4.2) provides a good description of lifetable methods, and distinguishes several types according to the data sources: Population Life Tables cohort life table - describes the mortality experience from birth to death for a particular cohort of people born at about the same time. People at risk at the start of the interval are those who survived the previous interval. current life table - constructed from (1) census information on the number of individuals alive at each age, for a given year and (2) vital statistics on the number of deaths or failures in a given year, by age. This type of lifetable is often reported in terms of a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 people. Generally, censoring is not an issue for Population Life Tables. Clinical Life tables - applies to grouped survival data from studies in patients with specific diseases. Because patients can enter the study at different times, or be lost to follow-up, censoring must be allowed. 79

80 Notation the j-th time interval is [t j 1, t j ) c j - the number of censorings in the j-th interval d j - the number of failures in the j-th interval r j is the number entering the interval Example: 2418 Males with Angina Pectoris (Lee, p.91) Year after Diagnosis j d j c j r j r j = r j c j /2 [0, 1) [1, 2) [2, 3) ( ) [3, 4) [4, 5) [5, 6) [6, 7) etc.. 80

81 Estimating the survivorship function We could apply the K-M formula directly to the numbers in the table on the previous page, estimating S(t) as Ŝ(t) = j:τ j <t 1 d j r j However, this approach is unsatisfactory for grouped data... it treats the problem as though it were in discrete time, with events happening only at 1 yr, 2 yr, etc. In fact, what we are trying to calculate here is the conditional probability of dying within the interval, given survival to the beginning of it. What should we do with the censored people? We can assume that censorings occur: at the beginning of each interval: r j = r j c j at the end of each interval: r j = r j on average halfway through the interval: r j = r j c j /2 The last assumption yields the Actuarial Estimator. It is appropriate if censorings occur uniformly throughout the interval. 81

82 Constructing the lifetable First, some additional notation for the j-th interval, [t j 1, t j ): Midpoint (t mj ) - useful for plotting the density and the hazard function Width (b j = t j t j 1 ) needed for calculating the hazard in the j-th interval Quantities estimated: Conditional probability of dying ˆq j = d j /r j Conditional probability of surviving ˆp j = 1 ˆq j Cumulative probability of surviving at t j : Ŝ(t j ) = l j = l j ˆp l 1 d l r l 82

83 Some important points to note: Because the intervals are defined as [t j 1, t j ), the first interval typically starts with t 0 = 0. Stata estimates the survival function at the right-hand endpoint of each interval, i.e., S(t j ) However, SAS estimates the survival function at the lefthand endpoint, S(t j 1 ). The implication in SAS is that Ŝ(t 0) = 1 and Ŝ(t 1) = p 1 83

84 Other quantities estimated at the midpoint of the j-th interval: Hazard in the j-th interval: ˆλ(t mj ) = d j b j (r j d j /2) = ˆq j b j (1 ˆq j /2) the number of deaths in the interval divided by the average number of survivors at the midpoint density at the midpoint of the j-th interval: ˆf(t mj ) = Ŝ(t j 1) Ŝ(t j) b j = Ŝ(t j 1) ˆq j b j Note: Another way to get this is: ˆf(t mj ) = ˆλ(t mj )Ŝ(t mj) = ˆλ(t mj )[Ŝ(t j) + Ŝ(t j 1)]/2 84

85 Constructing the Lifetable using Stata Uses the ltable command. If the raw data are already grouped, then the freq statement must be used when reading the data.. infile years status count using angina.dat (32 observations read). ltable years status [freq=count] Beg. Std. Interval Total Deaths Lost Survival Error [95% Conf. Int.]

86 It is also possible to get estimates of the hazard function, ˆλ j, and its standard error using the hazard option:. ltable years status [freq=count], hazard Beg. Cum. Std. Std. Interval Total Failure Error Hazard Error [95% Conf Int] There is also a failure option which gives the number of failures (like the default), and also provides a 95% confidence interval on the cumulative failure probability. 86

87 Constructing the lifetable using SAS If the raw data are already grouped, then the FREQ statement must be used when reading the data. SAS requires that the interval endpoints be specified, using one of the following (see SAS manual or online help for more detail): intervals - specify the the interval endpoints width - specify the width of each interval ninterval - specify the number of intervals Title Actuarial Estimator for Angina Pectoris Example ; data angina; input years status count; cards; /* angina cases */ /* censored */ proc lifetest data=angina outsurv=survres intervals=0 to 15 by 1 method=act; time years*status(0); freq count; 87

88 SAS output: Actuarial Estimator for Angina Pectoris Example The LIFETEST Procedure Life Table Survival Estimates Conditional Effective Conditional Probability Interval Number Number Sample Probability Standard [Lower, Upper) Failed Censored Size of Failure Error Survival Median Median Interval Standard Residual Standard [Lower, Upper) Survival Failure Error Lifetime Error