BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS"

Transcription

1 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS OF THE 1 LARGEST ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS IN THE UNITED STATES JULY 215

2

3 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS OF THE 1 LARGEST ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS IN THE UNITED STATES JULY North Tryon Street Charlotte, NC Texas Avenue Houston, TX Chauncy Street 6th Floor Boston, MA Loyola Avenue New Orleans, LA South Dearborn Street 52nd Floor Chicago, IL West 2 Street New York, NY Park Plaza Newark, NJ

4

5 Executive Summary iii Contents Acknowledgments iv Preface v Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers Emissions Trends Analysis State-by-State Emissions Summary Use of the Benchmarking Data Appendix A: Data Sources, Methodology, and Quality Assurance B: Fuel Mix of the Top-1 Power Producers C: Annual Capacity Factors for Select Fuels and Technologies Endnotes

6 iv BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS Acknowledgments This report is the product of a collaborative effort among Bank of America, Calpine, Entergy, Exelon, Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), Ceres, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The project partners would like to acknowledge and thank the following people who made this report possible. Ceres participation in this effort was made possible by a generous grant from the Bank of America Foundation. report authors Christopher E. Van Atten, M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC Amlan Saha, M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC Lauren Slawsky, M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC Clement Russell, M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC report design Douglas Ekstrand, Ekstrand Creative, LLC contributors Derek Furstenwerth, Calpine Rick Johnson, Entergy Bruce Alexander, Exelon Kimberly Scarborough, PSEG Dan Bakal, Ceres Derek Murrow, NRDC 1% porcelaineco Silk is an environmentally-responsible sheet with 1% Post-Consumer Fiber When citing this report, the following format is recommended: M. J. Bradley & Associates. (215). Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States. 215 M.J. Bradley & Associates LLC. All rights reserved.

7 Executive Summary v Preface The 215 Benchmarking report is the eleventh collaborative effort highlighting environmental performance and progress in the nation s electric power sector. The Benchmarking series began in 1997 and uses publicly reported data to compare the emissions performance of the 1 largest power producers in the United States. The current report is based on 213 generation and emissions data. Data on U.S. power plant generation and air emissions are available to the public through several databases maintained by state and federal agencies. Publicly- and privately-owned electric generating companies are required to report fuel and generation data to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Most power producers are also required to report air pollutant emissions data to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These data are reported and recorded at the boiler, generator, or plant level, and must be combined and presented so that company-level comparisons can be made across the industry. The Benchmarking report facilitates the comparison of emissions performance by combining generation and fuel consumption data compiled by EIA with emissions data on sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2) and mercury compiled by EPA; error checking the data; and presenting emissions information for the nation s 1 largest power producers in a graphic format that aids in understanding and evaluating the data. The report is intended for a wide audience, including electric industry executives, environmental advocates, financial analysts, investors, journalists, power plant managers, and public policymakers. The report is available in PDF format on the Internet at and Plant and company level data used in this report are available on the Internet at For questions or comments about this report, please contact: Christopher E. Van Atten M. J. Bradley & Associates, LLC 47 Junction Square Drive Concord, MA 1742 Telephone: vanatten@mjbradley.com

8

9 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 7 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers This report examines and compares the stack air pollutant emissions of the 1 largest power producers in the United States based on their 213 generation, plant ownership, and emissions data. Table 1 lists the 1 largest power producers featured in this report ranked by their total electricity generation from fossil fuel, nuclear, and renewable energy facilities. These producers include public and private entities 1 (collectively referred to as companies or producers in this report) that own roughly 2,8 power plants and account for 85 percent of reported electric generation and 87 percent of the industry s reported emissions. TABLE 1 1 Largest Electric Power Producers in the U.S. (in order of 213 electric generation) RANK PRODUCER NAME 213 MWh (million) RANK PRODUCER NAME 213 MWh (million) RANK PRODUCER NAME 213 MWh (million) RANK PRODUCER NAME 1 Duke Great Plains Energy NiSource Entegra Power Exelon Pinnacle West Occidental Energy Investors Funds Southern Salt River Project IDACORP EDP NextEra Energy Westar Riverstone PUD No 2 of Grant County AEP Energy Capital Partners Rockland Capital East Kentucky Power Coop Tennessee Valley Authority New York Power Authority Dow Chemical Big Rivers Electric Entergy San Antonio City Sempra CLECO Calpine OGE Omaha Public Power District PUD No 1 of Chelan County NRG General Electric Tri-State BP FirstEnergy Wisconsin Energy JEA Buckeye Power Dominion NV Energy Intermountain Power Agency El Paso Electric MidAmerican SCANA Los Angeles City Invenergy PPL Oglethorpe Puget Holdings Energy Northwest Energy Future Holdings Santee Cooper ArcLight Capital TransAlta US Corps of Engineers EDF Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA UniSource Xcel CMS Energy Arkansas Electric Coop Austin Energy Dynegy Basin Electric Power Coop Integrys J-Power PSEG Alliant Energy Exxon Mobil E.ON DTE Energy TECO ALLETE International Paper Ameren NE Public Power District Portland General Electric Brazos Electric Power Coop US Bureau of Reclamation Edison International Lower CO River Authority Avista AES Iberdrola PNM Resources LS Power Edison Mission Energy Tenaska Seminole Electric Coop Grand River Dam Authority PG&E Associated Electric Coop Great River Energy Hoosier Energy GDF Suez NC Public Power Brookfield Sacramento Municipal Util Dist MWh (million)

10 8 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS The report focuses on four power plant pollutants for which public emissions data are available: sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NOx), mercury (Hg), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). These pollutants are associated with significant environmental and public health problems, including acid deposition, global warming, fine particle air pollution, mercury deposition, nitrogen deposition, ozone smog, and regional haze. The report benchmarks, or ranks, each company s absolute emissions and its emission rate (determined by dividing emissions by electricity produced) for each pollutant against the emissions of the other companies. In 213, the 1 largest power producers in the U.S. generated 87 percent of the industry s air pollution emissions. The 1 largest power producers emitted in aggregate approximately 2.9 million tons of SO 2, 1.46 million tons of NOx, 2.7 tons of mercury, and 1.95 billion tons of CO 2. Air pollution emissions from power plants are highly concentrated among a small number of producers. The top ten producers were responsible for 41 percent of the SO 2, 36 percent of the NOx, 34 percent of the mercury, and 38 percent of the CO2 emissions of the 1 largest producers. Electric power producers emission levels and emission rates vary significantly due to the amount of power produced, the efficiency of the technology used in producing the power, the fuel used to generate the power, and installed pollution controls. The average and median emission rates (pounds per megawatt hour (lb/mwh)) shown in Table 2 provide benchmark measures of overall industry emissions that can be used as reference points to evaluate the emissions performance of individual power producers. FIGURE 1 Environmental Concerns Associated with Power Plant Emissions Global Warming CO2 Extreme weather Sea level rise and impacts to natural systems Ozone Smog NOx Nitrogen Deposition Excess nitrogen loading in sensitive water bodies Harms aquatic plants & animals Respiratory harm Crop damage Mercury Deposition Hg Bioaccumulation Toxic to humans Acid Deposition Fine Particulates Regional Haze NOx + SO2 Premature mortality Lung & heart disease Acidifies lakes & streams Forest damage Reduced visibility in areas of national interest, such as national parks

11 Across the industry, power plant emissions of SO 2 and NOx have decreased and CO 2 emissions have increased since 199. The power industry has dramatically reduced its SO 2 and NOx emissions. In 213, power plant SO 2 and NOx emissions were 8 percent and 74 percent lower, respectively, than they were in 199. In 213, power plant CO 2 emissions were 14 percent higher than they were in 199. In recent years, from 28 through 213, power plant CO 2 emissions decreased by 12 percent. Mercury emissions from power plants have decreased 5 percent since 2 (the first year that mercury emissions were reported by the industry under the Toxics Release Inventory). Collectively, power plants are responsible for a declining share of U.S. air pollution emissions. In 213, power plants were responsible for about 63 percent of SO 2 emissions, 13 percent of NOx emissions, 38 percent of mercury emissions, and 61 percent of CO 2 emissions. Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 9

12 1 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS TABLE 2 Emissions Data for 1 Largest Power Producers in order of 213 generation 213 Generation (MWh) 213 Emissions (ton) Emission Rates (lb/mwh) All Generating Sources Fossil Fuel Plants Coal Plants Rank Owner Ownership Type* Total Fossil Fuel Coal SO2 NOx CO2 Hg** SO2 NOx CO2 SO2 NOx CO2 SO2 NOx CO2 Hg 1 Duke investor-owned corp. 243,353,97 168,2,141 12,338,834 23,43 11, ,952, , , , Exelon investor-owned corp. 195,54,967 3,721,29 9,363,453 14,812 14,98 19,53, , , Southern investor-owned corp. 18,221,4 142,694,193 7,293, ,573 7,689 17,556, , , , NextEra Energy investor-owned corp. 175,676,789 99,52,84 5,187,397 4,745 17,422 48,781, , AEP investor-owned corp. 153,97, ,62, ,113,2 28,48 13,78 134,12, , , , Tennessee Valley Authority federal power authority 144,59,275 69,63,175 57,119,28 123,911 46,769 68,724, , , Entergy investor-owned corp. 129,44,678 5,799,82 14,795,295 47,571 39,634 38,429, , , Calpine investor-owned corp. 13,4,845 96,698, ,293 41,996, NRG investor-owned corp. 99,374,142 88,716,313 62,33,456 23,512 62,83 83,761, , , , FirstEnergy investor-owned corp. 96,48,658 65,335,231 6,43,553 9,95 65,487 67,46, , , , Dominion investor-owned corp. 93,924,999 47,994,54 24,88,466 33,516 19,715 36,564, , , MidAmerican privately held corp. 91,864,963 71,245,136 62,184,999 8,516 75,242 73,769, , , , PPL investor-owned corp. 88,63,487 67,132,456 57,, ,996 73,35 66,768, , , , Energy Future Holdings privately held corp. 73,48,162 52,921,22 51,884, ,75 32,379 61,21, , , , US Corps of Engineers federal power authority 68,994, Xcel investor-owned corp. 68,834,675 55,681,36 41,275,618 65,61 48,68 53,414, , , , Dynegy investor-owned corp. 6,842,97 6,842,97 44,326,658 57,564 23,318 57,145, , , , PSEG investor-owned corp. 54,49,386 24,819,61 6,48,856 9,97 11,378 15,335, , , DTE Energy investor-owned corp. 43,863,826 35,628,952 33,991, ,452 39,991 38,691, , , , Ameren investor-owned corp. 43,785,58 34,11,776 33,292,44 66,745 18,893 33,45, , , , US Bureau of Reclamation federal power authority 42,745,149 4,111,623 4,18,722 1,117 4,189 4,284, , , AES investor-owned corp. 41,129,9 38,294,449 35,216, ,77 34,974 4,36, , , , Edison Mission Energy privately held corp. 33,2,27 27,291,117 22,952,871 51,558 14,259 28,42, , , , PG&E investor-owned corp. 31,675,793 6,93, ,641, GDF Suez foreign-owned corp. 31,5,342 29,392,818 5,298,53 15,325 5,358 16,73, , , , Great Plains Energy investor-owned corp. 26,946,616 23,53,882 22,675,778 24,319 15,6 24,945, , , , Pinnacle West investor-owned corp. 26,68,373 17,317,62 11,292,238 8,18 22,15 14,958, , , , Salt River Project power district 26,337,482 2,833,998 15,862,38 6,36 22,8 19,529, , , , Westar investor-owned corp. 26,34,512 22,58,492 2,736,969 14,367 17,828 25,46, , , , Energy Capital Partners privately held corp. 26,22,545 26,22,545 8,954,234 17,92 7,92 17,535, , , , New York Power Authority state power authority 24,939,513 5,17, ,368, San Antonio City municipality 24,718,579 17,587,437 12,161,77 12,759 6,876 15,589, , , , OGE investor-owned corp. 23,961,116 22,33,656 12,759,335 31,78 25,229 2,48, , , , General Electric investor-owned corp. 22,962,985 22,33,92 1,81, ,414 18,183 16,353, , , , Wisconsin Energy investor-owned corp. 22,89,69 21,77,762 18,188,82 11,163 1,632 22,88, , , , NV Energy investor-owned corp. 22,84,46 22,84,46 4,64,486 4,265 6,726 12,349, , , , SCANA investor-owned corp. 21,954,354 15,626,669 9,533,223 11,516 6,284 12,755, , , , Oglethorpe cooperative 21,737,52 11,866,668 6,682,28 9,775 4,541 9,49, , , Santee Cooper state power authority 21,43,425 18,267,17 13,916,289 7,165 5,485 16,16, , , ,4.1 4 EDF foreign-owned corp. 21,33, CMS Energy investor-owned corp. 2,978,689 19,23,78 16,2,394 51,75 15,115 2,444, , , , Basin Electric Power Coop cooperative 19,589,295 18,64,467 17,974,58 25,947 24,95 21,482, , , , Alliant Energy investor-owned corp. 18,64,181 16,764,548 14,483,297 49,83 13,1 17,89, , , , TECO investor-owned corp. 18,351,48 18,351,48 1,732,747 11,898 5,556 14,821, , , , NE Public Power District power district 17,971,17 1,912,637 1,747,94 31,266 12,611 11,974, , , , Edison International investor-owned corp. 17,164,47 9,891,746 4,213,375 3,717 12,376 6,896, , , Iberdrola foreign-owned corp. 16,298, , , Tenaska privately held corp. 16,161,599 15,97, ,788 7,349, Associated Electric Coop cooperative 15,867,296 15,867,296 12,429,8 27,721 28,629 14,585, , , , NC Public Power municipality 15,354, , ,997 1, , , , NiSource investor-owned corp. 14,153,141 14,143,25 11,563,943 29,322 9,875 14,659, , , , Occidental investor-owned corp. 14,93,93 14,2, ,491, * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 privately/investor owned public power cooperative

13 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 11 ** Mercury emissions are based on 213 TRI data for coal plants Fossil fuel emission rate = pounds of pollution per MWh of electricity produced from fossil fuel Coal emission rate = pounds of pollution per MWh of electricity produced from coal Mercury emission rate = pounds of mercury per gigawatt hour (GWh) of electricity produced from coal 213 Generation (MWh) 213 Emissions (ton) Emission Rates (lb/mwh) All Generating Sources Fossil Fuel Plants Coal Plants Rank Owner Ownership Type* Total Fossil Fuel Coal SO2 NOx CO2 Hg** SO2 NOx CO2 SO2 NOx CO2 SO2 NOx CO2 Hg 53 IDACORP investor-owned corp. 13,829,871 8,17,61 6,519,614 8,341 7,452 7,918, , , , Riverstone privately held corp. 13,738,411 13,455,532 6,95,88 16,35 6,59 1,939, , , , Rockland Capital privately held corp. 13,565,458 13,565, , ,911, , Dow Chemical investor-owned corp. 13,372,349 12,22, ,746, Sempra investor-owned corp. 13,258,115 11,63, ,965, Omaha Public Power District power district 13,213,333 13,12,864 12,917,188 29,148 12,742 14,189, , , , Tri-State cooperative 13,29,89 13,29,89 12,29,522 7,94 15,763 14,47, , , , JEA municipality 12,794,926 12,794,77 6,734,426 13,754 12,11 12,32, , , , Intermountain Power Agency power district 12,387,224 12,387,224 12,38,465 4,724 23,697 12,336, , , , Los Angeles City municipality 12,337,751 9,38,957 3,595,132 1, 3,824 6,831, , , , Puget Holdings privately held corp. 12,189,373 9,55,688 4,184,481 4,23 5,759 7,267, , , , ArcLight Capital privately held corp. 11,756,197 7,561, , ,932, , , Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA municipality 11,716,254 4,897,43 3,361,261 4,915 2,23 4,274, , , Arkansas Electric Coop cooperative 11,566,145 1,982,44 9,317,24 25,561 12,754 11,66, , , , Integrys investor-owned corp. 11,524,777 1,79,96 8,868,777 17,446 5,274 1,652, , , , Exxon Mobil investor-owned corp. 11,388,564 1,463, ,186 4,74, ALLETE investor-owned corp. 11,79,12 9,873,294 9,856,675 8,886 9,421 11,74, , , , Portland General Electric investor-owned corp. 1,97,237 8,128,987 4,75,45 12,939 5,722 6,632, , , , Lower CO River Authority state power authority 1,858,719 1,792,52 7,39,178 1,79 5,5 9,839, , , , PNM Resources investor-owned corp. 1,787,793 7,589,55 5,993,187 3,817 11,373 7,362, , , , Seminole Electric Coop cooperative 1,624,361 1,624,361 7,735,364 11,952 2,459 9,349, , , , Great River Energy cooperative 1,511,768 1,366,68 9,91,867 17,613 9,695 11,558, , , , Brookfield foreign-owned corp. 1,427,47 41, , , Entegra Power privately held corp. 1,386,954 1,386, ,533, , , Energy Investors Funds privately held corp. 1,346,553 1,169,44 1,468,836 1,64 1,819 4,68, , EDP foreign-owned corp. 1,171, PUD No 2 of Grant County power district 1,99, East Kentucky Power Coop cooperative 9,853,229 9,754,931 9,367,67 9,978 4,464 1,396, , , , Big Rivers Electric cooperative 9,847,253 9,847,253 8,526,434 2,921 11,393 11,145, , , , CLECO investor-owned corp. 9,56,933 9,56,933 2,72,447 12,245 5,125 8,535, , , , PUD No 1 of Chelan County power district 9,45, BP foreign-owned corp. 9,427,148 5,377, ,411, Buckeye Power cooperative 9,419,551 9,419,551 9,31,726 12,44 5,292 9,83, , , , El Paso Electric investor-owned corp. 9,343,518 4,314, , ,13 2,768, , , Invenergy privately held corp. 9,172,44 2,472, ,57, Energy Northwest municipality 8,783, TransAlta foreign-owned corp. 8,715,612 7,121,213 6,73,715 2,821 7,864 8,29, , , , UniSource investor-owned corp. 8,666,665 8,638,7 7,526,651 5,674 9,872 8,84, , , , Austin Energy municipality 8,68,548 5,756,91 3,815, ,729 5,52, , , , J-Power foreign-owned corp. 8,439,93 8,439,93 289, ,17, , E.ON foreign-owned corp. 8,289, International Paper investor-owned corp. 7,543,455 1,682,214 34,46-2, , , Brazos Electric Power Coop cooperative 7,212,29 7,212,29 841,69 2,435 2,218 3,615, , , , Avista investor-owned corp. 7,11,5 3,17,564 1,37,44 1,35 1,714 2,268, , , LS Power privately held corp. 7,55,26 6,792,296 2,154,518 6,211 5,238 4,512, , , , Grand River Dam Authority state power authority 7,1,951 6,29,162 4,432,89 11,396 5,37 6,273, , , , Hoosier Energy cooperative 6,856,85 6,838,334 6,577,657 13,68 2,89 7,15, , , , Sacramento Municipal Util Dist municipality 6,765,215 5,475, ,334, Total (in thousands) 3,447,817 2,293,156 1,385,231 2,94 1,456 1,946,14.2 Average (mean) , , ,29.3 Average (weighted by MWh) , , ,191.3 Median , , ,27.3 * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 privately/investor owned public power cooperative

14 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS Oil <1% Natural Gas 3% Generation by Fuel Type The 1 largest power producers in the U.S. accounted for 85 percent of the electricity produced in 213. Coal accounted for 4 percent of the power produced by the 1 largest companies, followed by natural gas (26 percent), nuclear (22 percent), hydroelectric power (7 percent), oil (<1 percent), and nonhydroelectric renewables and other fuel sources (4 and 1 percent, respectively). Natural gas was the source of 37 percent of the power produced by smaller companies (i.e., those not within the top 1), followed by coal (3 percent), nonhydroelectric renewables/other (2 percent), hydroelectric power (7 percent), nuclear power (3 percent), and oil (1 percent). As a portion of total electric power production, the 1 largest producers accounted for 88 percent of all coal-fired power, 8 percent of natural gas-fired power, 35 percent of oil-fired power, 97 percent of nuclear power, 85 percent of hydroelectric power, and 73 percent of non-hydroelectric renewable power. Figure 3 illustrates the 213 electricity generation by fuel for each of the 1 largest power (MWh) producers. The generation levels, expressed in million megawatt hours, show production from facilities wholly and partially owned by each producer and reported to the EIA. Coal or nuclear accounted for over half of the output of the largest producers. The exceptions are a handful of generating companies whose assets are dominated by hydroelectric or natural gas-fired plants. FIGURE 2 U.S. Electricity Generation by Fuel Type (213) Renewable/Other 7% Hydro 7% Nuclear 19% Oil <1% Natural Gas 28% Coal 39% SOURCE: U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION. EIA-923 MONTHLY GENERATION AND FUEL CONSUMPTION 213 FINAL RELEASE. These data reflect the mix of generating facilities that are directly owned by the 1 largest power producers, not the energy purchases that some utility companies rely on to meet their customers electricity needs. For example, some utility companies have signed long-term supply contracts for the output of renewable energy projects. In this report, the output of these facilities would be attributed to the owner of the project, not the buyer of the output.

15 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 13 FIGURE 3 Generation of 1 Largest Power Producers by Fuel Type (213)* million MWh Renewable/Other Hydro Nuclear Oil Natural Gas Coal Duke Exelon Southern NextEra Energy AEP Tennessee Valley Authority Entergy Calpine NRG FirstEnergy Dominion MidAmerican PPL Energy Future Holdings US Corps of Engineers Xcel Dynegy PSEG DTE Energy Ameren US Bureau of Reclamation AES Edison Mission Energy PG&E GDF Suez Great Plains Energy Pinnacle West Salt River Project Westar Energy Capital Partners New York Power Authority San Antonio City OGE General Electric Wisconsin Energy NV Energy SCANA Oglethorpe Santee Cooper EDF CMS Energy Basin Electric Power Coop Alliant Energy TECO NE Public Power District Edison International Iberdrola Tenaska Associated Electric Coop NC Public Power NiSource Occidental IDACORP Riverstone Rockland Capital Dow Chemical Sempra Omaha Public Power District Tri-State JEA Intermountain Power Agency Los Angeles City Puget Holdings ArcLight Capital Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA Arkansas Electric Coop Integrys Exxon Mobil ALLETE Portland General Electric Lower CO River Authority PNM Resources Seminole Electric Coop Great River Energy Brookfield Entegra Power Energy Investors Funds EDP PUD No 2 of Grant County East Kentucky Power Coop Big Rivers Electric CLECO PUD No 1 of Chelan County BP Buckeye Power El Paso Electric Invenergy Energy Northwest TransAlta UniSource Austin Energy J-Power E.ON International Paper Brazos Electric Power Coop Avista LS Power Grand River Dam Authority Hoosier Energy Sacramento Municipal Util Dist * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 privately/investor owned public power cooperative

16 14 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS Emissions Rankings Table 3 shows the relative ranking of the 1 largest power producers by several measures their contribution to total generation, total emissions, and emission rates. These rankings help to evaluate and compare emissions performance. Figures 4 through 7 illustrate SO2, NOx, CO2, and mercury emissions levels (expressed in tons for SO2, NOx and CO2, and pounds for mercury) and emission rates for each of the 1 largest producers. These comparisons illustrate the relative emissions performance of each producer based on the company s ownership stake in power plants with reported emissions information. For SO2 and NOx, the report presents comparisons of total emissions levels and rates for fossil fuel-fired facilities. For CO2, the report presents comparisons of total emissions levels and rates for all generating sources (e.g., fossil, nuclear, and renewable). For mercury, the report presents comparisons of total emissions levels and rates for coal-fired generating facilities only. The mercury emissions shown in this report were obtained from EPA s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). The TRI contains facility-level information on the use and environmental release of chemicals classified as toxic under the Clean Air Act. While the TRI includes data on total facility chemical releases, this report uses the air releases section to calculate mercury emissions. Because coal plants are the primary source of mercury emissions within the electric industry, the mercury emissions and emission rates presented in this report reflect the emissions associated with each producer s fleet of coal plants only. Other toxic air pollutant emissions, such as hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride (acid gases), are also reported to EPA under the TRI program. However, we have not included these air toxics because of uncertainties about the quality of the data submitted to EPA. We will continue to evaluate whether these pollutants might be included in future benchmarking efforts. In general, there is a strong correlation between SO2 reductions and co-benefit reductions in acid gas emissions.

17 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 15 The charts present both the total emissions by company as well as their average emission rates. The evaluation of emissions performance by both emission levels and emission rates provides a more complete picture of relative emissions performance than viewing these measures in isolation. Total emission levels are useful for understanding each producer s contribution to overall emissions loading, while emission rates are useful for assessing how electric power producers compare according to emissions per unit of energy produced when size is eliminated as a performance factor. The charts illustrate significant differences in the total emission levels and emission rates of the 1 largest power producers. For example, the tons of CO 2 emissions range from to over 137 million tons per year. The NOx emission rates range from to 3.8 lb/mwh. The total tons of emissions from any producer are influenced by the total amount of generation that a producer owns and by the fuels and technologies used to generate electricity.

18 16 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS TABLE 3 Company Rankings for 1 Largest Power Producers (213) in alphabetical order By Generation By Tons of Emissions By Emission Rates All Generating Sources Fossil Fuel Plants Coal Plants Owner Ownership Type* Total Fossil Coal SO 2 NOx CO 2 Hg SO 2 NOx CO 2 SO 2 NOx CO 2 SO 2 NOx CO 2 Hg AEP investor-owned corp AES investor-owned corp ALLETE investor-owned corp Alliant Energy investor-owned corp Ameren investor-owned corp ArcLight Capital privately held corp Arkansas Electric Coop cooperative Associated Electric Coop cooperative Austin Energy municipality Avista investor-owned corp Basin Electric Power Coop cooperative Big Rivers Electric cooperative BP foreign-owned corp Brazos Electric Power Coop cooperative Brookfield foreign-owned corp Buckeye Power cooperative Calpine investor-owned corp CLECO investor-owned corp CMS Energy investor-owned corp Dominion investor-owned corp Dow Chemical investor-owned corp DTE Energy investor-owned corp Duke investor-owned corp Dynegy investor-owned corp E.ON foreign-owned corp East Kentucky Power Coop cooperative EDF foreign-owned corp Edison International investor-owned corp Edison Mission Energy privately held corp EDP foreign-owned corp El Paso Electric investor-owned corp Energy Capital Partners privately held corp Energy Future Holdings privately held corp Energy Investors Funds privately held corp Energy Northwest municipality Entegra Power privately held corp Entergy investor-owned corp Exelon investor-owned corp Exxon Mobil investor-owned corp FirstEnergy investor-owned corp GDF Suez foreign-owned corp General Electric investor-owned corp Grand River Dam Authority state power authority Great Plains Energy investor-owned corp Great River Energy cooperative Hoosier Energy cooperative Iberdrola foreign-owned corp IDACORP investor-owned corp Integrys investor-owned corp Intermountain Power Agency power district * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 privately/investor owned public power cooperative

19 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 17 A ranking of 1 indicates the highest absolute number or rate in any column: the highest generation (MWh), highest emissions (tons), or highest emission rate (lb/mwh). A ranking of 1 indicates the lowest absolute number or rate in any column. By Generation By Tons of Emissions By Emission Rates All Generating Sources Fossil Fuel Plants Coal Plants Owner Ownership Type* Total Fossil Coal SO 2 NOx CO 2 Hg SO 2 NOx CO 2 SO 2 NOx CO 2 SO 2 NOx CO 2 Hg International Paper investor-owned corp Invenergy privately held corp JEA municipality J-Power foreign-owned corp Los Angeles City municipality Lower CO River Authority state power authority LS Power privately held corp MidAmerican privately held corp Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA municipality NC Public Power municipality NE Public Power District power district New York Power Authority state power authority NextEra Energy investor-owned corp NiSource investor-owned corp NRG investor-owned corp NV Energy investor-owned corp Occidental investor-owned corp OGE investor-owned corp Oglethorpe cooperative Omaha Public Power District power district PG&E investor-owned corp Pinnacle West investor-owned corp PNM Resources investor-owned corp Portland General Electric investor-owned corp PPL investor-owned corp PSEG investor-owned corp PUD No 1 of Chelan County power district PUD No 2 of Grant County power district Puget Holdings privately held corp Riverstone privately held corp Rockland Capital privately held corp Sacramento Municipal Util Dist municipality Salt River Project power district San Antonio City municipality Santee Cooper state power authority SCANA investor-owned corp Seminole Electric Coop cooperative Sempra investor-owned corp Southern investor-owned corp TECO investor-owned corp Tenaska privately held corp Tennessee Valley Authority federal power authority TransAlta foreign-owned corp Tri-State cooperative UniSource investor-owned corp US Bureau of Reclamation federal power authority US Corps of Engineers federal power authority Westar investor-owned corp Wisconsin Energy investor-owned corp Xcel investor-owned corp * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 privately/investor owned public power cooperative

20

21 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 19 NOx and SO2 Emissions Levels and Rates Figures 4 and 5 display NOx and SO2 emission levels and emission rates for fossil fuel-fired generating sources owned by each company. Fossil only emission rates are calculated by dividing each company s total NOx and SO2 emissions from fossil-fired power plants by its total generation from fossil-fired power plants. Companies with significant coal-fired generating capacity have the highest total emissions of SO2 and NOx because coal contains higher concentrations of sulfur than natural gas and oil and coal plants generally have higher NOx emission rates. Figures 4 and 5 illustrate wide disparities in the fossil only emission levels and emission rates of the 1 largest power producers. Their total fossil generation varies from to 168 million MWh and: NOx emission rates range from to 3.8 lb/mwh, and NOx emissions range from to 13,78 tons; SO2 emission rates range from to 1.3 lb/mwh, and SO2 emissions range from to 28,48 tons.

22 2 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS 12 FIGURE 4 Fossil Fuel - NOx Total Emissions and Emission Rates (213)* Total emissions (thousand tons) and emission rates (lb/mwh) from fossil fuel generating facilities * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 1 NOx - tons Thousand tons of NOx emitted from fossil fuel generating facilities Oil Natural Gas Coal NOx - lb/mwh Pounds of NOx emitted per MWh of electricity produced from fossil fuel generating facilities privately/investor owned public power cooperative Intermountain Power Agency Associated Electric Coop PNM Resources International Paper Basin Electric Power Coop Pinnacle West Edison International Tri-State Arkansas Electric Coop Big Rivers Electric NE Public Power District UniSource OGE DTE Energy TransAlta Salt River Project PPL MidAmerican US Bureau of Reclamation FirstEnergy NC Public Power Omaha Public Power District El Paso Electric JEA Great River Energy IDACORP AES ALLETE Xcel Grand River Dam Authority General Electric Westar Alliant Energy LS Power AEP CMS Energy Entergy Portland General Electric NRG NiSource Tennessee Valley Authority Great Plains Energy Energy Future Holdings Puget Holdings Duke Buckeye Power Ameren Avista CLECO Edison Mission Energy Southern Wisconsin Energy Integrys Exelon Austin Energy Lower CO River Authority PSEG East Kentucky Power Coop Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA Riverstone Hoosier Energy Dominion Los Angeles City SCANA San Antonio City Dynegy Oglethorpe Brazos Electric Power Coop NV Energy Energy Capital Partners Santee Cooper TECO Seminole Electric Coop Invenergy GDF Suez Energy Investors Funds NextEra Energy Brookfield Tenaska J-Power ArcLight Capital Calpine Entegra Power Iberdrola Rockland Capital BP New York Power Authority Exxon Mobil Dow Chemical Occidental Sempra PG&E Sacramento Municipal Util Dist US Corps of Engineers EDF EDP PUD No 2 of Grant County PUD No 1 of Chelan County Energy Northwest E.ON

23 FIGURE 5 Fossil Fuel - SO 2 Total Emissions and Emission Rates (213)* Total emissions (thousand tons) and emission rates (lb/mwh) from fossil fuel generating facilities * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 3 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers SO2 - tons Thousand tons of SO2 emitted from fossil fuel generating facilities Oil Natural Gas Coal 1 SO2- lb/mwh Pounds of SO2 emitted per MWh of electricity produced from fossil fuel generating facilities privately/investor owned public power cooperative General Electric DTE Energy Energy Future Holdings Alliant Energy AES NE Public Power District CMS Energy Arkansas Electric Coop NRG Omaha Public Power District Big Rivers Electric AEP NiSource Ameren Hoosier Energy Edison Mission Energy Grand River Dam Authority Tennessee Valley Authority Associated Electric Coop Great River Energy PPL Integrys Southern Portland General Electric NC Public Power Basin Electric Power Coop FirstEnergy OGE Buckeye Power CLECO Duke Riverstone Xcel MidAmerican Seminole Electric Coop JEA Great Plains Energy IDACORP East Kentucky Power Coop Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA Dynegy Entergy LS Power ALLETE Oglethorpe SCANA San Antonio City Dominion Energy Capital Partners UniSource Westar Tri-State TECO GDF Suez Wisconsin Energy PNM Resources Exelon Pinnacle West Puget Holdings Avista PSEG TransAlta Santee Cooper Intermountain Power Agency Edison International Brazos Electric Power Coop Salt River Project US Bureau of Reclamation NV Energy Lower CO River Authority El Paso Electric Los Angeles City Energy Investors Funds Austin Energy ArcLight Capital Rockland Capital NextEra Energy J-Power BP Tenaska New York Power Authority Calpine Entegra Power Brookfield Sempra Iberdrola PG&E Invenergy Exxon Mobil Dow Chemical Sacramento Municipal Util Dist Occidental US Corps of Engineers EDF EDP PUD No 2 of Grant County PUD No 1 of Chelan County Energy Northwest E.ON International Paper

24 22 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS CO2 Emission Levels and Rates Figure 6 displays total CO2 emission levels from coal, oil, and natural gas combustion and emission rates based on all generating sources owned by each company. All-source emission rates are calculated by dividing each company s total CO2 emissions by its total generation. In most cases, producers with significant non-emitting fuel sources, such as nuclear, hydroelectric and wind power, have lower all-source emission rates than producers owning primarily fossil fuel power plants. Among the 1 largest power producers: Coal-fired power plants are responsible for 78 percent of CO2 emissions; Natural gas-fired power plants are responsible for 21 percent of CO2 emissions; Oil-fired power plants are responsible.3 percent of CO2 emissions. Figure 6 illustrates wide disparities in the all-source emission levels and emission rates of the 1 largest power producers. Their total electric generation varies from just under 7 million to 243 million MWh, their CO2 emissions range from to 137 million tons, and their CO2 emission rates range from to 2,264 lb/mwh.

25 FIGURE 6 All Source - CO 2 Total Emissions and Emission Rates (213)* Total emissions (million tons) and emission rates (lb/mwh) from all generating facilities * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 15 Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 23 CO2 - tons Million tons of CO2 emitted from all generating facilities Other Oil Natural Gas Coal CO2 - lb/mwh Pounds of CO2 emitted per MWh of electricity produced from all generating facilities 2, 1,5 1, 5 privately/investor owned public power cooperative Big Rivers Electric Great River Energy Basin Electric Power Coop Tri-State Omaha Public Power District ALLETE East Kentucky Power Coop Hoosier Energy Buckeye Power NiSource UniSource Wisconsin Energy Intermountain Power Agency CMS Energy AES Westar Arkansas Electric Coop Alliant Energy JEA Dynegy Great Plains Energy Integrys TransAlta Associated Electric Coop Lower CO River Authority Grand River Dam Authority CLECO DTE Energy Seminole Electric Coop AEP Edison Mission Energy NRG OGE Energy Future Holdings TECO MidAmerican Riverstone Xcel Ameren Santee Cooper PPL Salt River Project General Electric FirstEnergy PNM Resources Energy Capital Partners NE Public Power District Austin Energy LS Power San Antonio City Portland General Electric Southern Puget Holdings SCANA IDACORP Duke Pinnacle West NV Energy Los Angeles City GDF Suez Entegra Power Brazos Electric Power Coop Tennessee Valley Authority J-Power Occidental Tenaska Energy Investors Funds Oglethorpe Rockland Capital Dow Chemical Exxon Mobil Calpine Edison International Dominion Sempra Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA Sacramento Municipal Util Dist ArcLight Capital Avista Entergy El Paso Electric PSEG NextEra Energy BP Invenergy International Paper US Bureau of Reclamation Exelon New York Power Authority PG&E NC Public Power Iberdrola Brookfield US Corps of Engineers EDF EDP PUD No 2 of Grant County PUD No 1 of Chelan County Energy Northwest E.ON

26 24 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS Mercury Emission Levels and Rates Figure 7 displays total mercury emission levels and emission rates from coal-fired power plants. In 212, EPA finalized the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), regulating emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric generating units. The standards went into effect April 16, 215, although there are still pending legal challenges to the rule. The differences in mercury emission rates seen in the following figures are due to the mercury content and type of coal used, and the effect of control technologies designed to lower SO2, NOx, and particulate emissions. In recent years, a significant amount of coal-fired capacity has also installed mercury controls to comply with MATS and state mercury rules. Coal mercury emissions from the top 1 power producers range from less than 1 to 4,17 pounds, and coal mercury emission rates range from.3 to.81 pound per gigawatt hour (a gigawatt hour is 1, megawatt-hours).

27 FIGURE 7 Coal - Mercury Emission Rates and Total Emissions (213)* Emission rates (lb/gwh) and total emissions (pounds) from coal plants * Breakdown of ownership categories provided in endnote 2 1 gigawatt-hour (GWh) = 1, MWh 5, Emissions of the 1 Largest Electric Power Producers 25 Sacramento Municipal U 4, Mercury - pounds Pounds of mercury emitted from coal plants 3, 2, 1,.8 privately/investor owned public power Mercury - lb/gwh Pounds of mercury emitted per GWh of electricity produced from coal plants cooperative Great River Energy Energy Future Holdings CMS Energy NE Public Power District Alliant Energy Basin Electric Power Coop General Electric Entergy Arkansas Electric Coop Grand River Dam Authority CLECO NRG Ameren DTE Energy J-Power NV Energy GDF Suez Pinnacle West IDACORP ALLETE Omaha Public Power District Westar AEP US Bureau of Reclamation Los Angeles City Southern Integrys El Paso Electric Edison International Buckeye Power OGE Great Plains Energy Xcel AES MidAmerican Municipal Elec. Auth. of GA Oglethorpe Austin Energy NextEra Energy Lower CO River Authority Big Rivers Electric San Antonio City NiSource Salt River Project PPL UniSource PSEG Tennessee Valley Authority Tri-State Exelon Dominion Associated Electric Coop JEA Hoosier Energy FirstEnergy TransAlta Brazos Electric Power Coop LS Power Duke East Kentucky Power Coop Rockland Capital NC Public Power Wisconsin Energy SCANA Puget Holdings Avista Edison Mission Energy Dynegy Santee Cooper PNM Resources Portland General Electric Energy Capital Partners Riverstone Seminole Electric Coop TECO Energy Investors Funds ArcLight Capital Intermountain Power Agency Calpine US Corps of Engineers PG&E New York Power Authority EDF Iberdrola Tenaska Occidental Dow Chemical Sempra Exxon Mobil Brookfield Entegra Power EDP PUD No 2 of Grant County PUD No 1 of Chelan County BP Invenergy Energy Northwest E.ON International Paper Sacramento Municipal Util Dist

Emissions Data For E- Generated Plants

Emissions Data For E- Generated Plants BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS OF THE 100 LARGEST ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS IN THE UNITED STATES MAY 2014 BENCHMARKING AIR EMISSIONS OF THE 100 LARGEST ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS IN THE UNITED STATES MAY 2014

More information

I. TRANSMISSION OWNERS

I. TRANSMISSION OWNERS I. TRANSMISSION OWNERS 1. ALLETE, Inc. (for its operating division Minnesota Power, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Superior Water, Light and Power Company) 2. Ameren Illinois Company 3. Ameren

More information

J.D. Power Reports: Electric Utilities Achieve Highest Level of Business Customer Satisfaction since 2009

J.D. Power Reports: Electric Utilities Achieve Highest Level of Business Customer Satisfaction since 2009 w J.D. Power Reports: Electric Utilities Achieve Highest Level of Business Customer Satisfaction since 2009 Satisfaction Improves for More than 80 Percent of Utilities for Second Consecutive Year WESTLAKE

More information

Business Segmentation

Business Segmentation Business Segmentation Q4 2010 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY About EEI The Edison Electric Institute is the association of U.S. shareholderowned

More information

ClEan EnErgy DEploymEnt: 2014

ClEan EnErgy DEploymEnt: 2014 BEnChmarkIng UtIlIty ClEan EnErgy DEploymEnt: 2014 ranking 32 of the largest U.S. Investor-owned Electric Utilities on renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Ceres, Inc., in partnership with Clean Edge,

More information

Best Practices in Climate Change Risk Analysis for the Electric Power Sector

Best Practices in Climate Change Risk Analysis for the Electric Power Sector Best Practices in Climate Change Risk Analysis for the Electric Power Sector The Results of the Ceres Electric Power / Investor Dialogue Prepared by David Gardiner & Associates, LLC October 2006 A Ceres

More information

Finance and Accounting Division

Finance and Accounting Division Finance and Accounting Division The Business Services and Finance Division is part of EEI s Business Operations Group. This division provides the leadership and management for advocating industry policies,

More information

Electricity Sources. Coal Fleet

Electricity Sources. Coal Fleet This paper is called Coal Facts because it provides factual information and data related to coal-based electricity. Most of the data are taken from independent third party sources, such as the Energy Information

More information

MATS and Boiler Rules

MATS and Boiler Rules em feature MATS and Boiler Rules Practical, Data-Driven Standards by Gina McCarthy Gina McCarthy is Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. Environmental

More information

Benchmarking Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Portfolios in the U.S.

Benchmarking Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Portfolios in the U.S. Benchmarking Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Portfolios in the U.S. M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC November 2011 BENCHMARKING ELECTRIC UTILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY PORTFOLIOS IN THE U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS

FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS ACTION On March 16, 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule that would reduce emissions of toxic air pollutants from

More information

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by Transforming America s Energy Future Kentucky Energy Statistics Developed by 2 2 Summary The first edition of Kentucky Energy Statistics is offered by the National Association for State Energy Officials

More information

J.D. Power Reports: Communicating with Customers and Higher Price Satisfaction Increase Overall Satisfaction for Residential Electric Utilities

J.D. Power Reports: Communicating with Customers and Higher Price Satisfaction Increase Overall Satisfaction for Residential Electric Utilities w J.D. Power Reports: Communicating with Customers and Higher Price Satisfaction Increase Overall Satisfaction for Residential Electric Utilities Proactive Communication during Power Outages Remains a

More information

Utility Capital Expenditures

Utility Capital Expenditures Utility Capital Expenditures Jean Reaves Rollins UPMG--Atlanta October 2007 Your Boss Is Wrong You Are In Fact Doing Twice the Work 750,000 Total Investor-Owned Utility Employment 1998-2006 (C Three Analysis)

More information

RANKING POWER SCORECARDS ELECTRICITY COMPANIES. Wina Graus Monique Voogt Jan Willem Langeraar. November 2004 EEP03024

RANKING POWER SCORECARDS ELECTRICITY COMPANIES. Wina Graus Monique Voogt Jan Willem Langeraar. November 2004 EEP03024 RANKING POWER SCORECARDS ELECTRICITY COMPANIES Wina Graus Monique Voogt Jan Willem Langeraar November 2004 EEP03024 Commissioned by WWF European Policy Office Table of contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology

More information

Program Update. Sally Rand, EPA May 6, 2014

Program Update. Sally Rand, EPA May 6, 2014 Program Update Sally Rand, EPA May 6, 2014 SF 6 Emission Reduction Partnership for Electric Power Systems Since 1999, members of the U.S. electric power industry and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

More information

Credit Ratings Q3 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY

Credit Ratings Q3 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY Credit Ratings Q3 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY About EEI The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is the association that represents all U.S.

More information

Carbon Market Analyst

Carbon Market Analyst Carbon Market Analyst North America RESEARCH Carbon Exposure: Winners and Losers in a US Carbon Market November 2, 2009 TO THE POINT CONTENT Power and oil companies carbon exposure depends not only on

More information

Stock Performance Q4 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY

Stock Performance Q4 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY Stock Performance Q4 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY About EEI The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is the association that represents all

More information

APPENDIX B TO PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO SRP S STANDARD ELECTRIC PRICE PLANS EFFECTIVE WITH THE NOVEMBER 2012 BILLING CYCLE COST COMPARISON DATA

APPENDIX B TO PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO SRP S STANDARD ELECTRIC PRICE PLANS EFFECTIVE WITH THE NOVEMBER 2012 BILLING CYCLE COST COMPARISON DATA APPENDIX B TO PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO SRP S STANDARD ELECTRIC PRICE PLANS EFFECTIVE WITH THE NOVEMBER 2012 BILLING CYCLE COST COMPARISON DATA SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT

More information

Renewable Choice Energy

Renewable Choice Energy Catawba College Table of Contents About Renewable Choice The Problem: Electricity Production Today The Solutions: Renewable Energy Sources Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) Who can participate in Renewable

More information

Management Salaries in Local Publicly Owned Electric Utilities

Management Salaries in Local Publicly Owned Electric Utilities 2014 Survey of Management Salaries in Local Publicly Owned Electric Utilities 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20009-5715 202/467-2900 www.publicpower.org Survey of Management Salaries In Local

More information

AMI Fact Book 4Q 2009

AMI Fact Book 4Q 2009 Synopsis This report is a catalog of current and future AMI and smart meter deployments in the U.S. It includes profiles of utilities, government agencies, and private organizations influencing the development

More information

The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Mercury Air Toxics Standard (MATS)

The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Mercury Air Toxics Standard (MATS) The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Mercury Air Toxics Standard (MATS) Kevin Culligan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Associate Division Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division

More information

Basic Mercury Data & Coal Fired Power Plants

Basic Mercury Data & Coal Fired Power Plants Basic Mercury Data & Coal Fired Power Plants CCTR Basic Facts File #2 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette,

More information

New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised

New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised June 2, 2004 New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised Credit Analyst: Ronald M Barone, New York (1) 212-438-7662; Richard W Cortright, Jr.,

More information

Structuring Power Plant Emissions Standards Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act Standards for Existing Power Plants

Structuring Power Plant Emissions Standards Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act Standards for Existing Power Plants Structuring Power Plant Emissions Standards Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act Standards for Existing Power Plants October 2013 M. J. Bradley & Associates LLC 1 Foreword The electric power industry

More information

Site Identification No.: 197809AAO Application No.: 15030051

Site Identification No.: 197809AAO Application No.: 15030051 Project Summary for a Construction Permit Application from Midwest Generation for a Natural Gas Conversion Project for the Joliet Electric Generating Station Joliet, Illinois Site Identification No.: 197809AAO

More information

Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation

Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation 14 th IEA-IETA-EPRI Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading October 8, 2014 Agenda California s Long-Range

More information

The Role of Natural Gas in Texas and America CEA Meeting August 24 th, 2010

The Role of Natural Gas in Texas and America CEA Meeting August 24 th, 2010 The Role of Natural Gas in Texas and America CEA Meeting August 24 th, 2010 About ANGA Our Mission America's Natural Gas Alliance exists to promote the economic, environmental and national security benefits

More information

MLGW s Average Residential Utility Bill Ranks the Lowest

MLGW s Average Residential Utility Bill Ranks the Lowest MLGW s Average Residential Utility Bill Ranks the Lowest Each year, MLGW strives to deliver the highest quality service at the lowest possible rates. One way that we measure our performance is to examine

More information

Xposing Xcel THE TOLL OF COAL ON COLORADO

Xposing Xcel THE TOLL OF COAL ON COLORADO XposingXcel THETOLLOFCOALONCOLORADO AreportfromWildEarthGuardians ByJeremyNichols March30,2009 MISSIONSTATEMENT WildEarthGuardiansprotectsandrestoresthe wildlife,wildplaces,andwildriversoftheamericanwest.

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1363 Document #1606771 Filed: 04/01/2016 Page 1 of 13 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) State of West Virginia,

More information

AMERICA CAN CREATE 274,000 EFFICIENCY-RELATED JOBS, CUT ELECTRIC BILLS BY BILLIONS, AND CURB CARBON POLLUTION

AMERICA CAN CREATE 274,000 EFFICIENCY-RELATED JOBS, CUT ELECTRIC BILLS BY BILLIONS, AND CURB CARBON POLLUTION NRDC Carbon Pollution Standards Fact Sheet may 2014 FS:14-05-l AMERICA CAN CREATE 274,000 EFFICIENCY-RELATED JOBS, CUT ELECTRIC BILLS BY BILLIONS, AND CURB CARBON POLLUTION Earth s climate is on a path

More information

Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document

Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document 1.1. Introduction Renewable energy (RE) is a cost-effective approach for reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating

More information

2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S. Cities

2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S. Cities Memphis Light, Gas and Water 2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S. Cities Electricity Natural Gas Water Wastewater The information in this book has been compiled to ensure maximum accuracy at

More information

Wolverine Clean Energy Venture

Wolverine Clean Energy Venture Prepared for: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative Cadillac, Michigan Supplement to CAA Section 112(g) MACT Auxiliary Boiler Amended Application No. 317-07 Wolverine Clean Energy Venture Rogers City, MI

More information

Utilities Sector Analysis. Luke Friedman & Geno Frissora

Utilities Sector Analysis. Luke Friedman & Geno Frissora Utilities Sector Analysis { Luke Friedman & Geno Frissora Agenda - Overview - Business Analysis - Economic Analysis - Financial Analysis - Valuation - Recommendations - Questions SIM Weight vs. S&P Weight

More information

issue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc

issue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc issue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution The Clean Power Plan, finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is a game changer because it sets the first-ever limits on carbon

More information

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers A new European Environment Agency (EEA report, Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial

More information

Demand-Side Management Resulting in Emissions Reductions and SIP Credit

Demand-Side Management Resulting in Emissions Reductions and SIP Credit Demand-Side Management Resulting in Emissions Reductions and SIP Credit Adam Chambers National Renewable Energy Laboratory Performance Contracting Conference New Orleans, LA July 28, 2005 Presentation

More information

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update ERCOT Public October 16, 2015 ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update In August 2015, the U.S. Environmental

More information

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut s 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Analysis and Management Strategy April 24, 2013 R/S/L Modelers Work Shop Dallas, TX Sam Sampieri

More information

Electric Market National Overview

Electric Market National Overview Electric Market Overview Electric Market National Overview 1122 Electric Market Overview: Generation Output and Temperatures Page 2 of 8 Weekly U.S. Electric Generation Output and Temperatures Electric

More information

MISSION Build the alliances, processes, and tools to develop tomorrow s energy workforce.

MISSION Build the alliances, processes, and tools to develop tomorrow s energy workforce. Governance Policy BACKGROUND The Center for Energy Workforce Development (CEWD) was incorporated in March 2006 as a new, non-profit organization to help ensure that the nation s electric, natural gas,

More information

POWER SUPPLY PERFORMANCE INDEX: ANNUAL STATE REPORT

POWER SUPPLY PERFORMANCE INDEX: ANNUAL STATE REPORT POWER SUPPLY PERFORMANCE INDEX: ANNUAL STATE REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE The purpose of this report is to provide electricity customers and stakeholders with improved methods

More information

IGCC State Incentives Report

IGCC State Incentives Report IGCC State Incentives Report Created by the Energy Center of Wisconsin 2006. CO Name: Colorado Carbon Adder Description: The Colorado PUC approved a carbon cost adder for the current Xcel (Public Service)

More information

Increase Profitability through Motor Management. Jenny Harvey, CEE

Increase Profitability through Motor Management. Jenny Harvey, CEE Increase Profitability through Motor Management Jenny Harvey, CEE Do you know how many motors operate in the facility? know how repair/replace decisions are made in the facility? know ways to reduce costs

More information

EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE UK, 1970 TO 2014

EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE UK, 1970 TO 2014 STATISTICAL RELEASE: 17 DECEMBER 2015 EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE UK, 1970 TO 2014 There has been a long term decrease in the emissions of all of the air pollutants covered by this statistical release

More information

Business Strategies. 2013 Revenue by Segment

Business Strategies. 2013 Revenue by Segment Business Strategies Business Segmentation The industry s regulated business segments, Regulated Electric and Distribution, showed the largest revenue gains in both dollar and percentage terms in 2013,

More information

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Executive Summary Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is expected to require two generations of technology development to be commercially

More information

How to Reduce Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants

How to Reduce Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants NRDC issue brief update march 214 IB: 14-3-a Cleaner and Cheaper: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental, and Economic Benefits

More information

Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy

Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Mark Berkman, Ph.D. Dean Murphy, Ph.D. September 2015 This report was prepared for Nuclear Matters. All results

More information

National Top 100 (as of October 26, 2015)

National Top 100 (as of October 26, 2015) National Top 100 (as of October 26, 2015) The National Top 100 list represents the largest green power users within the Partnership. The combined green power usage of these Top 100 Partners amount to nearly

More information

Office of Energy Projects Energy Infrastructure Update For August 2012

Office of Energy Projects Energy Infrastructure Update For August 2012 For August 212 Natural Gas Highlights SG Resources Mississippi placed into service Cavern 4 of its Southern Pines Energy Center Project which will add 1 Bcf of working gas capacity to its facilities located

More information

2 nd Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. July 27, 2011

2 nd Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. July 27, 2011 2 nd Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call July 27, 2011 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Certain information contained in this presentation is forward-looking information based on

More information

Business Risks and Opportunities Related to Climate Change. Helen A. Howes Vice President, EH&S Exelon Corporation

Business Risks and Opportunities Related to Climate Change. Helen A. Howes Vice President, EH&S Exelon Corporation 0 Business Risks and Opportunities Related to Climate Change Helen A. Howes Vice President, EH&S Exelon Corporation Presentation Outline Exelon Background Position on Climate Change Legislation Voluntary

More information

The Clean Air Act s Economic Benefits. Past, Present and Future

The Clean Air Act s Economic Benefits. Past, Present and Future The Clean Air Act s Economic Benefits Past, Present and Future October 2010 Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaborative effort by Small Business Majority and The Main Street Alliance.

More information

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Reducing Air Pollution Protecting Public Health

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Reducing Air Pollution Protecting Public Health Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Reducing Air Pollution Protecting Public Health U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation 2 Overview of Action EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution

More information

National Price Rankings

National Price Rankings National Price Rankings The links below provide the latest available electric service price data from a July 1, 2010 survey of more than 150 investor-owned utilities. Data source: Edison Electric Institute.

More information

December 13, 2012. Boston, MA 02108 Somerset, Massachusetts 02726

December 13, 2012. Boston, MA 02108 Somerset, Massachusetts 02726 December 13, 2012 Via Certified First Class Mail Lisa Jackson, Administrator Resident Agent for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Dominion Energy New England, LLC Ariel Rios Building CT Corporation

More information

March 31, 2008. Environmental Management Commission Attention: Renewable Energy Scoping Process 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

March 31, 2008. Environmental Management Commission Attention: Renewable Energy Scoping Process 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE 332 Shady Grove Church Road Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Tel (336) 769-0955 - Fax (336) 769-9198 - E-mail: davidmickey@bellsouth.net www.bredl.org March 31, 2008 Environmental

More information

POWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO

POWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO Fact Sheet POWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO MICHAEL OBEITER, KRISTIN MEEK, AND REBECCA GASPER CONTACT Michael Obeiter Senior Associate Climate and Energy Program

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER ) COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ) REVISIONS TO THE ENERGY COST ) RECOVERY RIDER TO RECOVER

More information

Texas Natural Gas: Fuel for Growth. Michael J. Economides, PhD Professor, University of Houston and Philip E. Lewis, P.E.

Texas Natural Gas: Fuel for Growth. Michael J. Economides, PhD Professor, University of Houston and Philip E. Lewis, P.E. Texas Natural Gas: Fuel for Growth Michael J. Economides, PhD Professor, University of Houston and Philip E. Lewis, P.E. Consultant March 26, 2012 Texas Natural Gas: Fuel for Growth March 2012 Table of

More information

Resource Forecasting Assumptions. CARP Presentation

Resource Forecasting Assumptions. CARP Presentation Resource Forecasting Assumptions CARP Presentation Overview Economic models (EGEAS, PROMOD) depend on a plethora of economic assumptions Data sources may vary but the starting point for much of the data

More information

issue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc

issue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc issue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution The Clean Power Plan, finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is a game changer. It sets the first-ever limits on carbon pollution

More information

AMERICA S TOP POWER PLANT TOXIC AIR POLLUTERS

AMERICA S TOP POWER PLANT TOXIC AIR POLLUTERS AMERICA S TOP POWER PLANT TOXIC AIR POLLUTERS December 2011 About the Environmental Integrity Project The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the

More information

Winners and Losers in Restructuring: Assessing Electric and Gas Company Financial Performance

Winners and Losers in Restructuring: Assessing Electric and Gas Company Financial Performance Winners and Losers in Restructuring: Assessing Electric and Gas Company Financial Performance James Coyne and Prescott Hartshorne 1 Lexecon, Cambridge, MA Introduction The era of electric and natural gas

More information

Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations

Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations Technical Paper MS-17 Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations Authors: A.L. LeClair L.M. McDermitt Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. Barberton, Ohio, U.S.A

More information

Maryland Nuclear Power Plant s Contribution to the State Economy

Maryland Nuclear Power Plant s Contribution to the State Economy Maryland Nuclear Power Plant s Contribution to the State Economy PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Mark Berkman, Ph.D. Dean Murphy, Ph.D. September 2015 This report was prepared for Nuclear Matters. All results

More information

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities 2008 2012 an updated assessment

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities 2008 2012 an updated assessment Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities 2008 2012 an updated assessment Summary In 2012, air pollution from European industrial facilities cost at least EUR 59 billion (and up to EUR

More information

The Lone Star Ranking

The Lone Star Ranking The Lone Star Ranking Texas National Ranking for Key Environmental Indicators Public Interest Sunset Working Group Issue Paper No. 1 Brandon Vegter Texas Center for Policy Studies Fall 1999 Executive Summary

More information

Investor-Owned Utility Ratio Comparisons

Investor-Owned Utility Ratio Comparisons Investor-Owned Utility Ratio Comparisons 2002 Data Published March 2004 2301 M Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1484 202/467-2900 Investor-Owned Utility Ratio Comparisons, 2002 Data APPA provides several

More information

Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gases. OLLI Lectures November 2014 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine

Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gases. OLLI Lectures November 2014 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gases OLLI Lectures November 2014 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine Replacing Coal With Natural Gas Greenhouse Gas Reduction by Switching from Coal to Natural

More information

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Boilers and Process Heaters

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Boilers and Process Heaters State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Boilers and Process Heaters Original Date: July 1997 Revision Date: February 22, 2004 State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Air Quality Permitting

More information

Combined Heat & Power. Discussion with Connecticut Energy Advisory Board. February 23, 2010

Combined Heat & Power. Discussion with Connecticut Energy Advisory Board. February 23, 2010 Combined Heat & Power Discussion with Connecticut Energy Advisory Board February 23, 2010 Discussion Topics Introduce NRG Thermal Representative NRG Thermal projects District Energy Combined Heat and Power

More information

Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power

Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power ONLINE DATA APPENDIX Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power Lucas W. Davis UC Berkeley and NBER Catherine Wolfram UC Berkeley and NBER February 2012 This study is

More information

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description Birmingham City University / Students Union and Impacts Register Waste Production of non - hazardous waste Production of hazardous waste Storage of non - hazardous waste Potential for waste to be disposed

More information

City Council Briefing. June 16, 2010

City Council Briefing. June 16, 2010 City Council Briefing June 16, 2010 1 Review the City s electricity procurement program and upcoming contract for the period beginning January 1, 2011. How we buy electricity How well we did on our last

More information

TECHNICAL BRIEFING SHEET NRG Texas Power LLC Permit No.: HAP-14

TECHNICAL BRIEFING SHEET NRG Texas Power LLC Permit No.: HAP-14 TECHNICAL BRIEFING SHEET NRG Texas Power LLC Permit No.: HAP-14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NRG Texas Power LLC (NRG Texas) has requested a Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) Major Source [FCAA 112(g)] Permit HAP-14,

More information

WWW.IMMIGRANTJUSTICE.ORG/KIDS

WWW.IMMIGRANTJUSTICE.ORG/KIDS On the following pages you will find addresses for: Dept. of Justice Immigration Courts AND Dept. of Homeland Security Offices of Chief Counsel (OCC) DISCLAIMER: The most current addresses for DOJ Immigration

More information

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in North Carolina. Sam Watson, Senior Staff Attorney North Carolina Utilities Commission

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in North Carolina. Sam Watson, Senior Staff Attorney North Carolina Utilities Commission Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in North Carolina Sam Watson, Senior Staff Attorney North Carolina Utilities Commission October 21, 2008 Outline Senate Bill 3 (Session Law 2007-397)

More information

Commonly asked Question about Green Power, and Kit Carson Renewable Energy Program.

Commonly asked Question about Green Power, and Kit Carson Renewable Energy Program. Commonly asked Question about Green Power, and Kit Carson Renewable Energy Program. What is Green PowerlRenewable Energy? Some examples of green power are energy that is produced by wind, solar, biomass

More information

MAKING OHIO WORK FOR EVERYONE THE FITZGERALD PLAN FOR AN OHIO NEW ENERGY ECONOMY

MAKING OHIO WORK FOR EVERYONE THE FITZGERALD PLAN FOR AN OHIO NEW ENERGY ECONOMY MAKING OHIO WORK FOR EVERYONE THE FITZGERALD PLAN FOR AN OHIO NEW ENERGY ECONOMY INVESTING IN OHIO'S ENERGY ECONOMY On June 13th, Governor Kasich set Ohio back by signing SB 310. This legislation will

More information

Chapter 5 Renewable Energy

Chapter 5 Renewable Energy Chapter 5 Renewable Energy Introduction In FY 2012, 12.2% of the nation's electric power was generated via renewable resources. 26 The Administration s energy strategy encourages increased conventional

More information

Power Sector Capabilities

Power Sector Capabilities Power Sector Capabilities ABS GROUP OVERVIEW Customers in the global power market turn to ABS Group as a trusted partner and experienced consultant to solve some of their most challenging problems. We

More information

SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World. Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives

SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World. Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives 1 Purpose of Today A. CCS around the world B. What SaskPower is doing C.

More information

EPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country. Scott D. Deatherage 214-999-4979 sdeatherage@gardere.com

EPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country. Scott D. Deatherage 214-999-4979 sdeatherage@gardere.com EPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country Scott D. Deatherage 214-999-4979 sdeatherage@gardere.com United Nations 21 st Conference of the Parties United Nations Meeting on Climate Change

More information

2010 NOV 30 P MQ. November 29,2010

2010 NOV 30 P MQ. November 29,2010 Clean Air Council Via ELECTRONIC MAIL Environmental Quality Board Rachel Carson State Office Building.16 th Floor 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301 Dear Chairperson Hanger: 2874 RECEIVED IRRC

More information

Certified Retail Electric Service Providers Currently Registered in AEP Ohio Territory (includes both Ohio Power & Columbus Southern Power)

Certified Retail Electric Service Providers Currently Registered in AEP Ohio Territory (includes both Ohio Power & Columbus Southern Power) AEP Energy 353 West Erie St., Suite 700 Chicago, IL 60654 Phone: (866) 258-3782 www.aepenergy.com Agera Energy LLC 55 Pleasantville Rd. South Building, Suite S-107 Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 Phone: (844)

More information

Transmission Leadership. Teresa Mogensen Vice President, Transmission

Transmission Leadership. Teresa Mogensen Vice President, Transmission Transmission Leadership Teresa Mogensen Vice President, Transmission 1 Safe Harbor This material contains forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties ies and assumptions.

More information

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES Question1 Read the following article from the Fremont Gazette and answer the questions that follow. (a) Identify and describe TWO water-related environmental

More information

Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan

Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan Prepared for: American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers Association of American Railroads American

More information

Module 7 Forms of energy generation

Module 7 Forms of energy generation INTRODUCTION In rich countries like Australia, our standard of living is dependent on easily available energy. Every time you catch a bus, turn on a light or watch television energy is being used up. Over

More information

A pound of coal supplies enough electricity to power ten 100-watt light bulbs for about an hour.

A pound of coal supplies enough electricity to power ten 100-watt light bulbs for about an hour. Did You Know? A pound of coal supplies enough electricity to power ten 100-watt light bulbs for about an hour. Nonrenewable Coal Coal Basics Coal Takes Millions of Years To Create Coal is a combustible

More information

USA. Leader/Contributors: Jay Martin, Alpha Natural Resources (USA) Deck Slone, Arch Coal (USA)

USA. Leader/Contributors: Jay Martin, Alpha Natural Resources (USA) Deck Slone, Arch Coal (USA) USA Leader/Contributors: Jay Martin, Alpha Natural Resources (USA) Deck Slone, Arch Coal (USA) The primary energy consumption of the country accounted for 3,287 Mtce in 214. The major part of the energy

More information

MILLENNIUM PIPELINE NEW YORK S ENERGY BACKBONE Existing Benefits and Expansion Opportunities

MILLENNIUM PIPELINE NEW YORK S ENERGY BACKBONE Existing Benefits and Expansion Opportunities MILLENNIUM PIPELINE NEW YORK S ENERGY BACKBONE Existing Benefits and Expansion Opportunities New York is the fourth largest natural gas consuming state in the nation... Overview New York State is highly

More information

HB10-1365, Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act

HB10-1365, Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act National Governors Association Governors Energy Advisors Policy Institute HB10-1365, Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Martha E. Rudolph Director of Environmental Programs Colorado Department of Public Health and

More information

Natural Gas End-use Report

Natural Gas End-use Report San Diego County Greenhouse Gas Inventory An Analysis of Regional Emissions and Strategies to Achieve AB 32 Targets Natural Gas End-use Report Scott J. Anders Director, Energy Policy Initiatives Center

More information