1 Queensland Competition Authority GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Qld Re Submission on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for Thank you for the opportunity to provide this brief submission on the Draft Determination Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for Cotton Australia represents the interests of Queensland s cotton producers and ginners, and is also a member of the Queensland Farmers Federation (QFF). In addition to this submission Cotton Australia endorses the submission lodged by QFF. Cotton Australia cannot support the draft determination s increase of 16.3% for the main tariffs used by irrigators (T62, T65 & T66). While it is clear that the QCA has undertaken a detailed assessment of actual and theoretical costs in making its determination, it is highly concerning that it can calculate double digit increases year-on-year. While some spikes in costs inconsistent with CPI maybe understandable, 14 years of price increases far above CPI strongly suggests that either the pricing mechanism is flawed or the electricity sector is highly inefficient or a combination of both. Since 2014 irrigation tariffs have risen by approximately 270%, while according to the Reserve Bank of Australia s inflation calculator cumulative inflation from 2000 to 2013 was 44.8%, averaging 2.9% per annum. It is essential that the QCA reality checks its assumptions and calculations prior to making its final Determination. Cotton Australia is aware that it is not specifically within the Ministerial Delegation to the QCA for it to consider the impact on the profitability and sustainability of the industries that utilise electricity. However, it seems bizarre that the QCA must take into account the effect of the price determination on competition in the Queensland electricity market, yet not into account of the impact of the prices on the profitability of the enterprises that use electricity, and possibly more importantly the anticipated changes in demand and consumption that will result from higher prices. The Queensland electricity sector in general, and the rural user sector in particular, has already commenced an electricity use death spiral.
2 More and more consumers are either going fully or partially off-grid, in many cases enjoying overly generous subsidies (such as the Solar Feed-in Tariff Bonus). These subsidies are funded by remaining grid customers, who also face ever-increasing prices, so that the overall revenue requirements of the network and retail sector can be serviced, further incentivising consumers to leave the grid, and feeding the death spiral. Within the cotton industry significant numbers of growers are actively investing in solar and other alternative energy sources so they can either go completely off-grid or reduce their dependence on the grid supply. While these growers are acting in the best interests of their own businesses, their actions are putting further pricing pressure on those growers who remain on grid. Cotton Australia is aware of analysis done by Canegrowers which clearly shows a long-term reduction in demand that can be linked to the period of significant price increases. Cotton Australia urges both the QCA and the Queensland Government to undertake more extensive evaluation of the Canegrowers data to test the premise that electricity price reductions would actually stimulate demand, and lead to increase revenue for the electricity sector, while providing a more affordable supply for consumers such as irrigators. The current pricing model is simply not working. Cotton Australia would like to make the following specific points on the QCA Draft Determination. Dealing with Carbon Uncertainty (p iv) Cotton Australia calls for the QCA to ensure the process is in place for the full benefit of the removal of the Carbon Tax to be passed through to all consumers immediately upon its removal. Given the issue QCA has raised about its inability to change retail prices mid-year without a specific delegation from the Minister, Cotton Australia calls on both the Minister and the QCA to ensure adequate arrangements are in place to ensure the carbon cost component is removed, should the Carbon Tax be repealed post July 1, Cotton Australia calls on the QCA to amend its draft determination, so that the full impost of the carbon tax is removed from the transitional once the Carbon Tax is repealed. Cotton Australia does not accept the QCA argument for a 10% floor for transitional tariffs, as a means of closing the gap between the transitional tariffs and what QCA deems to be cost reflective prices for these tariffs.
3 The QCA must recognise that the Carbon Tax was a Federally imposed tax, and its expected removal should not be used as a method of increasing the cost of these transitional tariffs. Any Determination that does not fully pass on the benefit of the expected removal of the Carbon Tax will be vigorously opposed by the Cotton Industry. Ministerial Delegation (p 9) While the QCA may reasonably argue that the Delegation does not specifically require it to take into account the effect their pricing Determinations may have on future demand and therefore the Death Spiral referred to earlier in this submission, Cotton Australia does contend that the latitude provide by Section 90 (5) (b) Electricity Act gives the QCA the power to fully consider these impacts, and take them into account when making its Determination. Cotton Australia calls on the QCA to undertake comprehensive analysis of the elasticity or otherwise of electricity demand, and fully consider the results of this study prior to making its final Determination. Small Business and Unmetered Supplies (p 13) Cotton Australia repeats its call for the introduction of specific Food & Fibre tariffs that reflect the load profile and use patterns of irrigators and other primary producer users. While the current transitional tariffs are adequate in this regard, the tariffs that primary producers are being transitioned to, are for the vast majority of primary producers unsuitable, and if forced to adopt them, would put in considerable jeopardy the Queensland Government s agriculture strategy to double production. While Cotton Australia can accept that the QCA is technically correct that it cannot examine network costs, and can only pass them through, this represents a major flaw in the pricing process. It is ridiculous that the body charged with setting Queensland s retail electricity prices does not have the power to interrogate the veracity and prudency of a cost that represents 50% of its final charges. Cotton Australia calls on the Queensland Government to initiate a complete review of all the factors that contribute to electricity pricing in this State, and the impact that electricity pricing is likely to have on all sectors of the Queensland economy. Network Charges for Very Large Customer (p 15) While Cotton Australia has long been concerned about the quantum of charges, it welcomes the decision of the QCA to maintain its approach for setting tariffs for Very Large Customers.
4 Cotton Australia would strongly oppose any move towards site specific network charges for Very Large Customers, as it would have a massive impact on the economic sustainability of essential operations such as cotton ginning. Implementing the Benchmarking Approach (p30) Cotton Australia is concerned about the QCA decision to allow the $3.80 component per customer for late payment. While Cotton Australia may not have a full understanding of the legal framework around this issue, it does not seem right that all customers should have to foot the bill for the cost of late payments caused by a few. Cotton Australia calls for a mechanism to be put in place to ensure that customers who make timely payments are not incurring cost caused by the late payments of others. Customer Acquisition and Retention Costs (p31) Cotton Australia believes that the cost of customer attraction should be seen as a capital cost, one that must be incurred by a business to grow the business, and not viewed as an operating cost. Further, Cotton Australia can see no justification for a Customer Acquisition and Retention Cost to be applied to Ergon s tariffs as it remains the case that there is no evidence of any real opportunity for competition. While Cotton Australia is generally supportive of competition, the value and impact of the Uniform Tariff policy is much greater, and unless and until the benefits of the UTP can be maintained in a way that also allows the development of true competition then these costs are unjustified, regardless of the QCA view as to whether they are operational or not in nature. Competition consideration (p37) Cotton Australia opposes the continuation of the headroom charge, primarily on the basis that it is unjustified cost for small business and residential customers in the Ergon area, where as explained above there is not currently an atmosphere conducive to effective competition, and secondly because the evidence presented by QCA seem to be inconclusive as to whether the headroom charge has done anything to foster greater competition in either South-East Queensland or for large customers in the Ergon area. The shear concept of a headroom charge fails the consumer reality test. It is akin to any retailer putting up prices by 50% one day, so they can advertise a 33% off sale the next. Transitional Arrangements for Obsolete and Transitional tariffs
5 Cotton Australia welcomes the QCA decision not to seek to recover the 10% plus increase in tariffs that irrigators would have faced, if the government last year had not made the policy decision to cap the increase to 10%. Cotton Australia concurs with the reasoning of the QCA in adopting this position. However, Cotton Australia remains very concerned about the QCAs approach to transitional tariffs. While Cotton Australia appreciates the seven-year transitional period, as opposed to the one-year originally put in place (2012), the fact of the matter is that the tariffs being transitioned to are not suitable for the vast majority of irrigator users. Broadly speaking, cotton grower irrigation electricity-use profiles fall into three categories and the new tariff structures will impact on these categories differently. Large Users: Typically, these are larger users with a high reliance on supplemented, unsupplemented and overland flows. When water is available in the river at levels that satisfy their licence requirements, they activate their pumps, and will pump 24hrs a day, seven days per week while the water is available. However, the reality is that months, and sometimes years, may pass with no pumping, and when pumping is activated it may be for as little as day, could extend to several days or even weeks, but would very rarely extend to a month of continuous pumping. Therefore, there is normally no opportunity to effectively balance out the high demand charge component, against the lower usage charges. Typically they use large capacity pumps, which do have relatively high electricity requirements. Their usage profile can be summarised as relatively high demand requirement, highly climate dependant, and episodic usage. The St George Case Study in Section 3 covers Large Users. 24hr Users: Typically these are users with smaller water licences than the larger users described above, who use electricity not only to draw water from their primary source be it river, bore or overland flow, but may also use electricity to power irrigation systems such as drip irrigation, centre pivot irrigators or recycling pumps. When they pump, they tend to pump for 24hr periods, and their usage is a little more predictable that the large users describe above, but still with significant variability, primarily related to season conditions. Their usage profile can be summarised as medium demand requirement, broadly predictable, but still subject to significant climate induced variability.
6 Off-Peak: Usage is similar to the 24 Hour users described above, except these users have invested in higher capacity infrastructure, allowing them to operate primarily during offpeak/shoulder periods, such as nights and weekends. Their usage profile can be summarised as having a higher peak demand per hectare irrigated (when compared with 24hr users), broadly predictable, but subject to significant climate induced variability and a high preference for off-peak/shoulder use. Off-peak usage is also favoured by many growers for their recycling pumps. It is imperative that suitable tariffs that reflect the above usage patterns are available to irrigators, and quite simply Tariffs 22, 44, 45 and 46 do not meet those requirements. To put is simply, irrigators, including cotton growers, need access to tariffs that prices electricity in harmony with their usage patterns. In particular the demand based tariffs that QCA believes larger users should transition to, are completely inadequate and not cost effective for flood harvesters who need relatively large amounts of electricity, for short-periods of time, at largely unpredictable intervals. Cotton Australia is appalled by the data provided by Ergon on potential bill impacts for customers being transitioned from the current farming and irrigation tariffs to the demand based tariffs. Last year Cotton Australia has a number of irrigators in the St George district provide it with data, supplied by Ergon, on the impact of changing tariffs, and the results are considerable different to the aggregated data provide by Ergon and included by the QCA in Appendix D. A number of typical examples are reproduced on the following pages. It is clear that if faced with these tariff structures and associated electricity price increases, the growers will have no option to switch to alternative energy sources such as diesel, which will not only lead to a requirement for massive investment on the behalves, but will also see the 33KVA line completely un-utilised, and Ergon receiving no return from its installed infrastructure. Note that the increase costs are in the order of 400%, many times higher than the impacts presented by Ergon in Figure 20.
11 Cotton Australia recommends that QCA view their transitional arrangements as interim, and fully co-operate with all stakeholders in developing suitable Food and Fibre Tariffs. As previously stated Cotton Australia calls for the complete pass through of the benefits of the removal of the carbon tax should that occur. Submission ends
Submission to the Queensland Competition Authority Draft Determination Regulated Retail Electricity Prices 2013-14 March, 2013 1 Cotton Australia Cotton Australia is the key representative body for the
Retail Tariffs Business, Irrigation and Farming Tariffs Background on Ergon Energy Qld Retail Tariffs The Queensland Competition Authority (QCA) has been delegated the task of determining notified prices
Submission to the Queensland Competition Authority Transitional Issues & Cost Components and Other Issues January 2013 Queensland Farmers Federation Ltd. A.C.N. 055 764 488 A.B.N. 44 055 764 488 PO Box
QFF MEMBERS Australian Prawn Farmers Association CANEGROWERS Cotton Australia Growcom Nursery & Garden Industry Queensland Qld Chicken Growers Association Qld Dairyfarmers Organisation ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
Ms Sophie Dunstone Committee Secretary Select Committee on Electricity Prices GPO Box 854 CANBERRA ACT 2601 September 14 2012 Dear Ms Dunstone Re: Select Committee on Electricity Prices Thank you for the
Pioneer Valley Water Co-operative Limited. A co-operative formed under the Cooperatives Act 1997. ABN 55 322 373 770. PO Box 275 (Level A, 120 Wood Street) Mackay QLD 4740 Reference: C10/015/10 7 January
Submission addressed to: Department of Energy and Water Supply Sent by email: firstname.lastname@example.org CANEGROWERS submission to the 30-year electricity strategy Summary In this submission measures
CCIQ Submission to the QCA consultation paper Regulated Retail Electricity Prices 2013-14: Cost Components and Other Issues About the Submission CCIQ makes this submission in response to the QCAs consultation
Final Determination Regulated retail electricity prices 2014 15 May 2014 We wish to acknowledge the contribution of the following staff to this report: Dan Barclay, Courtney Chester, Jennie Cooper, James
"Advocating on behalf of peak FNQ industry and social organisations for competitively priced and reliable electricity in FNQ" Ergon Future Network Tariff Submission PO Box 2148, Cairns QLD 4870 T : (07)
Tariff 20 - ERG69764RS Small Business Electricity Ergon Single rate Regulated offer 01-Jul-2015 Tariff 20 Business General Supply 1st July to 30th June All consumption. Anytime All consumption 22.481 cents
Understanding Network Tariff Reform A guide for small to medium business and residential customers who use less than 100MWh of electricity a year Ergon Energy is restructuring the way it charges for the
Department of Energy and Water Supply Electricity On-Supply in Queensland Discussion Paper State of Queensland, Department of Energy and Water Supply, 2013. The Queensland Government supports and encourages
REGULATED RETAIL ELECTRICITY PRICES 2013-14 Submission to the Queensland Competition Authority: March 2013 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND Chamber of Commerce & Industry Queensland CCIQ Submission
Regulated Retail Electricity Prices 2014-15 Submission to QCA Draft Determination About us The Queensland Council of Social Service (QCOSS) is Queensland s peak representative body for the community services
FINAL REPORT 2014 Residential Electricity Price Trends To COAG Energy Council 5 December 2014 Reference: EPR0040 2014 Residential Price Trends Inquiries Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449
Energex Statement of expected price trends 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015-1- 2014/15 Statement of expected price trends Version control Version Date Description 1.0 16 June 2013 Published on Energex s website
Retail Operating Costs A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE ECONOMIC REGULATION AUTHORITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA March 2012 Frontier Economics Pty. Ltd., Australia. i Frontier Economics March 2012 Public Retail Operating
FINAL REPORT 2013 Residential Electricity Price Trends 13 December 2013 Reference: EPR0036 Final Report Inquiries Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449 Sydney South NSW 1235 E: email@example.com
Energy Tariffs and Associated Charges As permitted by Ergon Energy www.ergon.com.au The tariffs applied to the on-supply arrangement are in-line with the local area retailer s standing offer (Ergon Energy).
AEMC Electricity Price Trends report released AUSTRALIAN ENERGY MARKET COMMISSION LEVEL 5, 201 ELIZABETH STREET SYDNEY NSW 2000 T: 02 8296 7800 E: AEMC@AEMC.GOV.AU W: WWW.AEMC.GOV.AU The Australian Energy
Causes of residential electricity bill changes in Victoria, 1995 to 2013 prepared for: Victorian Electricity Distribution Businesses DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared for the Victorian electricity
Submission in Response to Regulated Retail Electricity Prices 2013-2014 Transitional Issues Consultation Paper January 2013 About National Seniors Australia With a quarter of a million members Australia-wide,
Welcome to Ergon Energy Retail Effective from 1 July 2015 1 A guide to managing your electricity Thanks for choosing Ergon Energy Retail. We re here to provide you with great service and support your retail
PERFORMANCE REPORT PRICING 2013-14 October 2014 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Essential Services Commission 2014, Energy retailers comparative performance report pricing 2013-14, October 2014
Final Decision Review of Electricity Distribution Network Minimum Service Standards and Guaranteed Service Levels to apply in Queensland from 1 July 2010 April 2009 Level 19, 12 Creek Street Brisbane Queensland
NORTHERN IRELAND ELECTRICITY Ltd STATEMENT OF CHARGES FOR USE OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND ELECTRICITY Ltd ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BY AUTHORISED PERSONS Effective from 1 October 2011 to 30 September
Pty Ltd ABN 85 082 464 622 Level 2 / 21 Kirksway Place Hobart TAS 7000 www.auroraenergy.com.au Enquiries regarding this document should be addressed to: Network Regulatory Manager Pty Ltd GPO Box 191 Hobart
Analysis of Queensland Government Electricity Sector Cash Flows February 2014 Analysis of Queensland Government Electricity Sector Cash Flows February 2014 David Spearritt Director ORION Consulting Network
Electricity Distribution Business Pricing Methodology Effective 1 April 2015 1. GLOSSARY Commerce Commission (Commission) EDB Electricity Authority (EA) Responsible for the regulation of EDBs as provided
Review of PIRSA s Cost Recovery Policy and practices, including their application to the Fisheries and Aquaculture Industries Primary Industries and Regions SA 29 July 2015 Contents Executive Summary...
Submission on the Senate Inquiry into the performance and management of electricity network companies 18 December 2014 Submission on the Senate Inquiry into The performance and management of electricity
Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal FACT SHEET Changes in regulated electricity prices from 1 July 2012 Based on Final Determination, 13 June 2012 The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal
Grid Connected Storage Various Applications Realised with Proven Technologies Wilhelm van Butselaar Clean Energy Week 2013, Brisbane July 2013 Disclaimer IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE This presentation does not
Water Charges Plan Decision Paper (Executive Summary) DOCUMENT TYPE: REFERENCE: DATE PUBLISHED: QUERIES TO: Decision Paper CER/14/746 30 September 2014 firstname.lastname@example.org The Commission for Energy
Network Pricing Trends Queensland Perspective 20 January 2015 Foreword This report has been prepared for Infrastructure Partnerships Australia (IPA). Its purpose is to help build community understanding
UNDERSTANDING ENERGY BILLS & TARRIFS as part of the Energy Efficiency Information Grants Program Reading and understanding your energy and gas bills is a good first step to help you to identify where you
I m helping my customers save and growing my business. Up to $100 customer cash back Everyone wins with a change to Tariff 31 or 33 Next time you re on a job, you can do both yourself and your customer
Reform of the distribution network pricing arrangements under the National Electricity Rules to provide better guidance for setting, and consulting on, cost-reflective distribution network pricing structures
POWER NETWORKS 2014-15 Electricity Network Tariffs and Charges and Future Price Trends August 2014 Power and Water Corporation Table of Contents 1 Business Characteristics... 3 2 2014 Network Price Determination...
Western Australian Feed-In Tariff Discussion Paper OVERVIEW In September 2008, the incoming State Government announced its intention to introduce a feed-in tariff as part of the Liberal Plan for Environmental
Committee on the Northern Territory s Energy Future Electricity Pricing Options Submission from Power and Water Corporation October 2014 Power and Water Corporation 1. INTRODUCTION On 21 August 2014, the
Issues Paper Investigation into Retail Prices for Non-Contestable Electricity Customers in the ACT December 2002 The Independent Competition and Regulatory Commission (ICRC) is established by the Independent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Notification No. 2096/KSERC/CT/2014 Dated, Thiruvananthapuram 10 th June 2014. In exercise of the powers conferred under sections 66, 86 (1) (e) and 181 of
NSWIC NEW SOUTH WALES IRRIGATORS COUNCIL PO Box R1437 Royal Exchange NSW 1225 Tel: 02 9251 8466 Fax: 02 9251 8477 email@example.com www.nswic.org.au ABN: 49 087 281 746 Energy Policy Electricity Tariffs
Overview 3 Electricity price increases 4 Capital and operating expenditure 6 Demand side management 7 Issues with sales/demand forecasts 8 2 Business SA is the State s leading business organisation, representing
Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal FACT SHEET Changes in regulated electricity prices from 1 July 2012 Based on Draft Determination, 12 April 2012 The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal
Impact of green energy policies on electricity prices July 2014 Synergies Economic Consulting Pty Ltd www.synergies.com.au Disclaimer Synergies Economic Consulting (Synergies) and ROAM Consulting (ROAM)
SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSLAND PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION ISSUES PAPER ON SOLAR FEED IN PRICING IN QUEENSLAND ui CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND SUBMISSION 23 November 2015 1 CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW...3
 Queensland Government Gazette Extraordinary PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 366] Friday 18 July 2014 [No. 62 Electricity Act 1994 RETAIL ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR CUSTOMERS ON STANDARD RETAIL
APRIL 2014 ELECTRICITY PRICES AND NETWORK COSTS 1 WHAT MAKES UP THE RETAIL ELECTRICITY BILL? Retail electricity bills are made up of a number of components: Wholesale costs reflecting electricity generation
Essential Energy Network Price List (Excluding GST) Effective 1 July 2014 Tariff Code Obsolete tariffs on same rate Description Network Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Peak Shoulder OffPeak
HARNESS Utilising solar energy to save money Why consider solar? No control over ever rising electricity prices Electricity costs have doubled over the last 10 years* What will your electricity bill be
July 2004 Interval Meter Rollout MANDATORY ROLLOUT OF INTERVAL METERS FOR ELECTRICITY CUSTOMERS Final decision 2nd Floor, 35 Spring St Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Phone: 61 3 9651 0222, Fax: 61 3 9651
Retailer Margins in Victoria s Electricity Market Discussion Paper May 2013 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Essential Services Commission 2013, Retailer Margins in Victoria s Electricity Market
AusNet Electricity Services Pty Ltd Submitted: 26 October 2015 About AusNet Services AusNet Services is a major energy network business that owns and operates key regulated electricity transmission and
SUBMISSION Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments INTRODUCTION Cement Concrete and Aggregates Australia made a preliminary submission to
BRIEFING PAPER: GROWING QUEENSLAND COMMUNITY ENERGY INTRODUCTION Community energy groups in Queensland have developed this briefing paper with support from the Community Power Agency. The briefing paper
Project Evaluation Guidelines Queensland Treasury February 1997 For further information, please contact: Budget Division Queensland Treasury Executive Building 100 George Street Brisbane Qld 4000 or telephone
Electricity network services Long-term trends in prices and costs Contents Executive summary 3 Background 4 Trends in network prices and service 6 Trends in underlying network costs 11 Executive summary
Revenue and Financing Policy The Revenue and Financing Policy explains how the Council funds each activity it is involved in and why. Council provides a number of distinct activities and services to its
Causes of residential electricity bill changes in Victoria, 1995 to 2014 prepared for: Victorian Electricity Distribution Businesses DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared for the Victorian Electricity
RULE DETERMINATION National Electricity Amendment (Network Support Payments and Avoided TUoS for Embedded Generators) Rule 2011 Commissioners Pierce Henderson Spalding 22 December 2011 JOHN PIERCE Chairman
Ausgrid Network Pricing Proposal For the Financial Year Ending June 2013 May 2012 Table of Contents PART 1 APPROACH TO PRICE SETTING 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW... 4 2. BACKGROUND... 6 3. PRICING METHODOLOGY...
A guide to the water charge (infrastructure) rules: Tier 2 requirements June 2011 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 23 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601 Commonwealth
ELECTRICITY PRICE TRENDS FINAL REPORT Possible future retail electricity price movements: 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2015 22 March 2013 Reference: EPR0029 Electricity price trends report EMBARGO until 22 March
29 June 2011 Special Commission of Inquiry Electricity PO Box A1150 SYDNEY SOUTH 1235 1. The NSW Business Chamber welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the NSW Government s Special Commission
Provincial Renewable Energy Project (RRP SOL 46014) SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY Sector Road Map 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities 1. Grid-connected electricity is generated and
AGL Energy Limited ABN: 74 115 061 375 Level 22, 101 Miller St North Sydney NSW 2060 Locked Bag 1837 St Leonards NSW 2065 T: 02 9921 2999 F: 02 9921 2552 www.agl.com.au 19 February 2015 Australian Energy
Australian Energy Market Commission Level 6, 201 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A2449, Sydney South NSW 1235 P 02 8296 7800 F 02 8296 7899 E firstname.lastname@example.org ABN 49 236 270 144 www.aemc.gov.au
ELECTRICITY TARIFF SCHEDULE (This tariff is effective from 1 st January 2014 and supersedes the previous tariff schedule which was effective from 1 st June 2011) Schedule 1 TNB tariff rates are set out
Carbonproof Energy Procurement Practice Guide The material provided in this guide has been produced in conjunction with our partner Energetics Pty Ltd. 2011 Energetics Pty Ltd and AgriFood Skills Australia.
8 September 2014 John Denlay Manager, Demand Management Policy Energy Markets and Programs Division GPO Box 1264 Adelaide SA 5001 By email: DSD.REESReview@sa.gov.au Dear Mr Denlay RE: REES CONSULTATION
Electricity Market Reform: Consultation on Low Carbon Contracts Company s and Electricity Settlements Company s operational costs 2015/16 Government Response January 2015 Crown copyright 2015 URN 15D/001
Secure, affordable and efficient electricity for business in Western Australia. September 2012 Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia Contents Executive summary 3 Next steps for electricity
Network Demand Management Case Study Royal Flying Doctor Service Townsville Base June 2011 Network demand Management Case Study - Royal Flying Doctor Service Townsville Base Key Challenge: The Royal Flying
SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSLAND PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION ISSUES PAPER ON ELECTRICITY PRICING IN QUEENSLAND ui CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND SUBMISSION 16 November 2015 1 CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW...3
Australian owned and operated energy provider Energy Price Fact Sheet Red Energy Flexible Living Energy Saver - Offer Reference RED25341MR Why you should choose Red Energy Pay on Time discounts off your
Overview - State Tax Review Discussion Paper FEBRUARY 2015 WWW.YOURSAY.SA.GOV.AU Why Are We Reviewing Our State Tax System? South Australia is already a great place to live and we value that as a community.
STANDARD ELECTRIC PRICE PLANS SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT Corporate Pricing For additional information, please call 602-236-5522 or 602-236-2950 TEMPORARY Prices Effective
6 December 2013 The 30-year Electricity Strategy Discussion Paper Department of Energy and Water Supply PO Box 15456 CITY EAST QLD 4002 email@example.com Dear Sir/Madam RE: Submission
ov 26 OTES O AURORA LIE CHARGES FOR ETWORK DESIGERS, COSULTATS AD ELECTRICAL COTRACTORS 1. PURPOSE AD SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMET This document provides general advice for personnel involved in the alteration