Wythe County Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System
|
|
|
- Dana Moore
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Teacher Performance Evaluation System
2 Forward The Wythe County Teacher Evaluation Manual and system was developed in response to the updated Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for teachers approved by the Virginia Board of Education on April 28, These guidelines are required to begin implementation by July 1, In order to recognize and account for the significant impact teaching has on student achievement, the major change of these guidelines is the inclusion of measuring, documenting, and using student performance data to inform decision making. The Wythe County Evaluation Manual and system will allow for: Benchmarking behaviors for each of the teacher performance standards; Recognizing the relationship between teacher performance and student achievement; Documenting teacher performance based on multiple data sources; Empowering teachers to present evidence of their performance and student academic growth; Providing performance reviews that stress accountability, professional improvement, and teacher involvement in the evaluation process; Providing supportive assistance when needed. Page 2
3 Acknowledgements Thanks to the following individuals for dedicating their time and expertise to the creation of this document. Katheryn O Dell Max Meadows Elementary Debbie Wolford Jackson Memorial Elementary Kristy Beck Speedwell Elementary Jennifer Harrington Rural Retreat Elementary Brittany Sage Sheffey Elementary Annie Zorn Spiller Elementary Dana Smith Fort Chiswell Middle School Becky Rouse- Rural Retreat Middle School Judy Willis Scott Memorial Middle School L.E. Younger George Wythe High School Melissa Dalton Rural Retreat High school Lisa Vaught - Fort Chiswell High School Gail Kern Wythe County Technology Center Kelly Russell- WCEA Representative Mary Walters- Principal, Rural Retreat Elementary Becki James- Principal, Fort Chiswell Middle School Jeff Noe Executive Director of Instruction Marcy Olinger- Director of Elementary and Middle Education Beth Cochran Coordinator of Federal Programs and Testing Non-Discrimination Notice In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs and activities. The following persons have been designated to handle inquires regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of Human Resources School Social Worker Executive Director of Educational Services 1570 West Reservoir Street 1570 West Reservoir Street 1570 West Reservoir Street Wytheville, VA Wytheville, VA Wytheville, VA Page 3
4 Additionally, to file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C or call toll free (866) (Voice). Individuals who are hearing impaired or have speech disabilities may contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) ; or (800) (Spanish). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Purposes of this Document The Board of Education is required to establish performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers, principals, and superintendents to serve as guidelines for school divisions to use in implementing educator evaluation systems. The Code of Virginia requires (1) that teacher evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board of Education s Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) that school boards procedures for evaluating instructional personnel address student academic progress. Section :5 (Standard 5. Quality of classroom instruction and educational leadership) of the Code of Virginia states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education in the Commonwealth, teacher, administrator, and superintendent evaluations shall be consistent with the performance objectives included in the Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents. Teacher evaluations shall include regular observation and evidence that instruction is aligned with the school's curriculum. Evaluations shall include identification of areas of individual strengths and weaknesses and recommendations for appropriate professional activities. Section (Employment of teachers) states, in part, the following: Purposes of Evaluation C. School boards shall develop a procedure for use by division superintendents and principals in evaluating instructional personnel that is appropriate to the tasks performed and addresses, among other things, student academic progress [emphasis added] and the skills and knowledge of instructional personnel, including, but not limited to, instructional methodology, classroom management, and subject matter knowledge. The primary purposes of a quality teacher evaluation system are to: contribute to the successful achievement of the goals and objectives defined in the school division s educational plan; improve the quality of instruction by ensuring accountability for classroom performance and teacher effectiveness; implement a performance evaluation system that promotes a positive working environment and continuous communication between the teacher and the evaluator that promotes continuous professional growth and improved student outcomes; promote self-growth, instructional effectiveness, and improvement of overall professional performance; and, ultimately optimize student learning and growth. Page 4
5 A high quality evaluation system includes the following distinguishing characteristics: benchmark behaviors for each of the teacher performance standards; a focus on the relationship between teacher performance and improved student learning and growth; a system for documenting teacher performance based on multiple data sources regarding teacher performance; the use of multiple data sources for documenting performance, including opportunities for teachers to present evidence of their own performance as well as student growth; a procedure for conducting performance reviews that stresses accountability, promotes professional improvement, and increases teacher involvement in the evaluation process; and a support system for providing assistance when needed. Page 5
6 VIRGINIA S UNIFORM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS Performance Standards Clearly defined professional responsibilities constitute the foundation of the teacher performance standards. A fair and comprehensive evaluation system provides sufficient detail and accuracy so that both teachers and evaluators (i.e., principal, supervisor) reasonably understand the job expectations. Performance standards define the criteria expected when teachers perform their duties. For all teachers, there are seven performance standards: Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Performance Standard 2: Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Performance Standard 3: Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Performance Standard 4: Assessment of and for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. Performance Standard 5: Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. Performance Standard 6: Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Performance Standard 7: Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. Performance Indicators Performance indicators provide examples of observable, tangible behavior that indicate the degree to which teachers are meeting each teaching standard. This helps teachers and their evaluators clarify performance levels and job expectations and provide the answer to what must be performed. Performance indicators are provided as examples of the types of performance that will occur if a standard is being fulfilled. However, the list of performance indicators is not exhaustive, and they are not intended to be prescriptive. Teachers are not expected to demonstrate each performance indicator, as all performance indicators may not be applicable to a particular work assignment. Some teaching positions may need to identify specific indicators that are consistent with job requirements and school improvement plans. Teachers of students with disabilities, for example, are required to participate in Individual Educational Program (IEP) meetings and maintain appropriate documentation regarding student performance. This might be added as a performance indicator under Performance Standard 7 (Student Academic Progress). Similarly, science teachers might add a performance indicator regarding laboratory safety under Performance Standard 5 (Learning Environment). Evaluators and teachers should consult the sample performance indicators for clarification of what constitutes a specific performance standard. Performance ratings are NOT made at the performance indicator level, but at the performance standard level. Additionally, it is important to document a teacher s performance on each standard with evidence generated from multiple performance indicators: Page 6
7 Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 1.1 Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards. 1.2 Integrates key content elements and facilitates students use of higher level thinking skills in instruction. 1.3 Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real world experiences and applications. 1.4 Demonstrates an accurate knowledge of the subject matter. 1.5 Demonstrates skills relevant to the subject area(s) taught. 1.6 Bases instruction on goals that reflect high expectations and an understanding of the subject. 1.7 Demonstrates an understanding of the intellectual, social, emotional, and physical development of the age group. 1.8 Communicates clearly and checks for understanding. Performance Standard 2: Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 2.1 Uses student learning data to guide planning. 2.2 Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and transitions. 2.3 Plans for differentiated instruction. 2.4 Aligns lesson objectives to the school s curriculum and student learning needs. 2.5 Develops appropriate long- and short-range plans and adapts plans when needed. Performance Standard 3: Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 3.1 Engages and maintains students in active learning. 3.2 Builds upon students existing knowledge and skills. 3.3 Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. 3.4 Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. 3.5 Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. 3.6 Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. 3.7 Communicates clearly and checks for understanding. Page 7
8 Performance Standard 4: Assessment of and for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 4.1 Uses pre-assessment data to develop expectations for students, to differentiate instruction, and to document learning. 4.2 Involves students in setting learning goals and monitoring their own progress. 4.3 Uses a variety of assessment strategies and instruments that are valid and appropriate for the content and for the student population. 4.4 Aligns student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks. 4.5 Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes and uses grading practices that report final mastery in relationship to content goals and objectives. 4.6 Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes to inform, guide, and adjust students learning. 4.7 Gives constructive and frequent feedback to students on their learning. Performance Standard 5: Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 5.1 Arranges the classroom to maximize learning while providing a safe environment. 5.2 Establishes clear expectations, with student input, for classroom rules and procedures early in the school year, and enforces them consistently and fairly. 5.3 Maximizes instructional time and minimizes disruptions. 5.4 Establishes a climate of trust and teamwork by being fair, caring, respectful, and enthusiastic. 5.5 Promotes cultural sensitivity. 5.6 Respects students diversity, including language, culture, race, gender, and special needs. 5.7 Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and responses. 5.8 Maximizes instructional learning time by working with students individually as well as in small groups or whole groups. Page 8
9 Performance Standard 6: Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 6.1 Collaborates and communicates effectively within the school community to promote students well-being and success. 6.2 Adheres to federal and state laws, school and division policies, and ethical guidelines. 6.3 Incorporates learning from professional growth opportunities into instructional practice. 6.4 Sets goals for improvement of knowledge and skills. 6.5 Engages in activities outside the classroom intended for school and student enhancement. 6.6 Works in a collegial and collaborative manner with administrators, other school personnel, and the community. 6.7 Builds positive and professional relationships with parents/guardians through frequent and effective communication concerning students progress. 6.8 Serves as a contributing member of the school s professional learning community through collaboration with teaching colleagues. 6.9 Demonstrates consistent mastery of standard oral and written English in all communication. Performance Standard 7: Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. Performance Indicators Examples of teacher work conducted in the performance of the standard may include, but are not limited to: 7.1 Sets acceptable, measurable, and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress based on baseline data. 7.2 Documents the progress of each student throughout the year. 7.3 Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met, including the state-provided growth measure when available as well as other multiple measures of student growth. 7.4 Uses available performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and develop interim learning targets. Page 9
10 Evaluation Timeline Timeline By September 15 By September 30 By October 30 By January 30 By March 30 By April 5 Activity for Professional Improvement Establish student progress goal (all teachers) Complete at least one observation of all probationary and specific continuing contract teachers Complete second required observation of all probationary and specific continuing contract teachers Mid-year review of student progress goal (all teachers). Probationary teachers and specific continuing contract teachers will review Teacher Choice Criteria Interim performance evaluation of probationary and specific continuing contract teachers Observation (all probationary teachers at least two times and specific continuing contract teachers at least once) Any teacher being non-renewed or recommended for dismissal must be notified Task or Document Goal Setting for Student Progress Form Observation Guidelines Observation Guidelines Goal Setting for Student Progress Form Teacher Choice Component Interim Performance Report Summative Evaluation Report Observation Guidelines Letter To Superintendent Responsibility of Principal Teacher Principal Teacher Principal Teacher Principal Teacher Principal Teacher Principal Teacher Teacher Initials Principal Initials 1. Observations WCPS Observation process consists of THREE main components: Observations, Student Growth, and Teacher Choice Observations are intended to provide information on a wider variety of contributions made by teachers in the classroom or to the school community as a whole. Administrators are continually observing in their schools by walking through classrooms and non-instructional spaces, attending meetings, and participating in school activities. These day-to-day observations are not necessarily noted in writing, but they do serve as a source of information. The Observation/Document Review Form is used to provide targeted feedback on teachers effectiveness related to seven performance standards: Professional Knowledge, Instructional Planning, Instructional Delivery, Assessment of/for Learning, Learning Environment, Professionalism, and Student Progress. Classroom observations provide key information on several of the specific standards. Probationary teachers will be observed at least four times per year. Two of these observations will occur prior to October 30. At least two more observations will occur before March 30. Specific continuing contract teachers will be observed at least three times per Page 10
11 year. Additional observations for any staff member will be at the building administrator s discretion. All observations will include a classroom observation of at least 30 minutes and a post-conference. A pre-conference should be conducted. Evaluators use observations as one source of information to determine whether a teacher is meeting performance standards. The evaluator provides feedback about the observation using an observation form and through a postconference with the teacher. Other observation forms may be used at the evaluator s discretion. After each observation, one copy of the observation form will be given to the teacher and a copy will be maintained by the evaluator for the entire evaluation cycle to document growth and development. In a formal observation, the evaluator conducts a structured or semi-structured, planned observation -- either announced or unannounced -- typically when a teacher is presenting a lesson to or interacting with students. Evaluators can use formal observations as one source of information to determine whether a teacher is meeting expectations for performance standards. Formal classroom observations should last a specified period of time (for example, 30 or 45 minutes, or the duration of a full lesson). For maximum value, the building level administrator should ensure formal observations occur throughout the year. Typically, the evaluator provides feedback about the observation during a review conference with the teacher. During the conference the evaluator reviews all applicable documentation. (An optional formal observation form is included; however, administrators may choose to use their own template.) Informal Observations Informal observations are intended to provide more frequent information on a wide variety of contributions made by teachers in the classroom or to the school community as a whole. Evaluators are encouraged to conduct informal observations by observing instruction and non-instructional routines at various times throughout the evaluation cycle. Informal observations might include observing instruction for a short duration or observing work in non-classroom settings at various times throughout the school year. For example, an informal observation might include briefly visiting a classroom during a science laboratory experiment or observing a teacher participating in a faculty meeting or committee meeting. An important factor for evaluators to remember when collecting informal observation data is to focus on specific, factual descriptions of performance. Also, it is important to obtain a representative sampling of performance observations through regular, repeat visits to classrooms. (An optional informal observation form is included; however administrators may choose to use their own template.) Walk-through Observations Walk-through observations are a means for documenting and assessing practices and trends throughout a school. Walkthrough observations are designed to provide brief (three to five minutes) visits in multiple classrooms. While walkthrough visits can be helpful in checking for standard instructional practices or for vertical and horizontal curriculum articulation across the school, evaluators should be cautious in relying on these visits for individual teacher evaluation as generally; they are not designed for teacher evaluation. Visits of three to five minutes, even if conducted frequently, may not do justice to teachers in terms of understanding their instructional or assessment practices, student time-on-task, learning environment, and so forth. Review of Observations After the post-conference with the building principal, teachers have the option to request a review of a completed observation by an administrator outside of their building if they feel the observation is inaccurate. This can be a review of documentation, or a complete classroom observation. This request should be made in writing to the building principal within five (5) working days, who will work with the teacher to select an outside observer. Page 11
12 Formal Classroom Observation Form (Optional) Directions: This form is to be used for probationary teachers and specific teachers with continuing contract status. Observers should use the form to provide feedback to teachers about the observation. Teacher s Name Date Observed Time Observer s Name The teacher is: Probationary Continuing Contract 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards Integrates key content elements and facilitates students use of higher level thinking skills in instruction Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real world experiences and applications Demonstrates an accurate knowledge of the subject area(s) taught Demonstrates skills relevant to the subject area(s) taught Bases instruction on goals that reflect high expectations and an understanding of the subject Demonstrates an understanding of the intellectual, social, emotional, and physical development of the age group Communicates clearly and checks for understanding Comments: 2. Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Uses student learning data to guide planning Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and transitions Plans for differentiated instruction Aligns lesson objectives to the school s curriculum and student learning needs Develops appropriate long- and short-range plans and adapts plans when needed Comments: 3. Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Expands and maintains students in active learning Builds upon students existing knowledge and skills Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs Page 12
13 Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning Communicates clearly and checks for understanding Comments: 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. Uses pre-assessment data to develop expectations for students, to differentiate instruction, and to document learning Involves students in setting learning goals and monitoring their own progress Uses a variety of assessment strategies and instruments that are valid and appropriate for the content and for the student population Aligns student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes and uses grading practices that report final mastery in relationship to content goals and objectives Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes to inform, guide, and adjust students learning Gives constructive and frequent feedback to students on their learning Comments: 5. Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. Arranges the classroom to maximize learning while providing a safe environment Establishes clear expectations, with student input, for classroom rules and procedures early in the school year, and enforces them consistently and fairly Maximizes instructional time and minimizes disruptions Establishes a climate of trust and teamwork by being fair, caring, respectful, and enthusiastic Promotes cultural sensitivity Respects students diversity, including language, culture, race, gender, and special needs Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and responses Maximizes instructional learning time by working with students individually as well as in small groups or whole groups Comments: Page 13
14 6. Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Collaborates and communicates effectively within the school community to promote students well-being and success. Adheres to federal and state laws, school policies, and ethical guidelines Incorporates learning from professional growth opportunities into instructional practice Sets goals for improvement of knowledge and skills Engages in activities outside the classroom intended for school and student enhancement Works in a collegial and collaborative manner with administrators, other school personnel, and the community Builds positive and professional relationships with parents/guardians through frequent and effective communication concerning students progress Serves as a contributing member of the school s professional learning community through collaboration with teaching colleagues Demonstrates consistent mastery of standard oral and written English in all communication Comments 7. Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. Sets acceptable, measurable, and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress based on baseline data. Documents the progress of each student throughout the year Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met, including the state-provided growth measure when available as well as other measures of academic progress Uses available performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student progress and develop interim learning targets Comments: Additional Comments: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Page 14
15 Informal Classroom Observation Form (Optional) Directions: This form can be used during informal classroom observations. A copy is to be given to the teacher and one copy maintained by the evaluator for the entire evaluation cycle to document growth and development. Teacher Observed: Date: Time: 1. Professional Knowledge Addresses appropriate curriculum standards Integrates key content elements and facilitates students use of higher level thinking skills Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning Demonstrates an accurate knowledge of the subject area(s) taught Demonstrates skills relevant to the subject area(s) taught Bases instruction on goals that reflect high expectations Demonstrates an understanding of the knowledge of development Communicates clearly 2. Instructional Planning Uses student learning data to guide planning Plans time for realistic pacing Plans for differentiated instruction Aligns lesson objectives to curriculum and student needs Develops appropriate long- and short-range plans and adapts plans Specific Examples: Specific Examples: 3. Instructional Delivery Engages students Builds on prior knowledge Differentiates instruction Reinforces learning goals Uses a variety of strategies/resources Uses instructional technology Communicates clearly Specific Examples: 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning Uses pre-assessment data Involves students in setting learning goals Uses valid, appropriate assessments Aligns assessments with standards Uses a variety of assessment strategies Uses assessment tools for formative/summative purposes Gives constructive feedback Specific Examples: Page 15
16 5. Learning Environment Arranges the classroom to maximize learning and provides a safe environment Establishes clear expectations Maximizes instruction/minimal disruption Establishes a climate of trust/teamwork Promotes cultural sensitivity/respects diversity Listens and pays attention to students needs and responses Maximizes instructional learning time by working with students individually and in groups Specific Examples: 6. Professionalism Collaborates/communicates effectively Adheres to laws/policies/ethics Incorporates professional development learning Incorporates learning from professional growth activities Sets goals for improvement Activities outside classroom Builds positive relationship with parents Contributes to professional learning community Demonstrates mastery of standard oral and written English Specific Examples: 7. Student Academic Progress Sets student achievement goals Documents progress Provides evidence of goal attainment Develops interim learning targets Specific Examples: NOTE: It is unlikely that all teacher performance standards would be documented in a single classroom visit. In fact, an observation might focus on a specific standard. Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Page 16
17 2. Student Academic Progress The preponderance of evidence indicates the most important school-related factor in students education is a quality teacher. Teacher evaluations frequently ignore the results of teaching, which is student learning. If the purpose of teaching is to nurture learning, then both teachers and schools should be judged for their effectiveness on the basis of what and how much students learn. Using student academic progress (as a measure of student achievement) to inform teacher evaluation makes sense because the most direct measure of teacher quality appears to be student achievement. Research strongly supports the argument that ineffective teachers negatively impact students learning while effective teachers lead to higher student achievement growth. In addition, linking student academic progress with teacher evaluation offers significant potential: provides an objective measure of teacher effectiveness and recognizes that students bring different levels of achievement to each classroom; can serve as meaningful feedback for instructional improvement; can serve as a barometer of success and a motivation tool; and is derived from student assessment and is an integral facet of instruction. Teachers have a definite and powerful impact on student learning and academic performance. The purposes of goal setting include focusing attention on students and on instructional improvement based on a process of determining baseline performance, developing strategies for improvement, and assessing results at the end of the academic year. More specifically, the intent of student achievement goal setting is to: make explicit the connection between teaching and learning; make instructional decisions based upon student data; provide a tool for school improvement; increase the effectiveness of instruction via continuous professional growth; focus attention on student results; and ultimately increase student achievement. Page 17
18 Goal Setting Process Student achievement goal setting involves several steps, beginning with knowing where students are in relation to what is expected of them. Then, teachers can set specific, measurable goals based on both the demands of the curriculum and the needs of the students. The next part of the process is recursive in that the teacher creates and implements strategies and monitors progress. As progress is monitored, the teacher makes adjustments to the teaching and learning strategies. Finally, a summative judgment is made regarding student learning for a specific period of time. Step 1: Determine Needs Step 2: Create specific learning goals based on preassessment Step 3: Create and implement teaching and learning strategies Step 4: Monitor student academic progress through ongoing formative assessment Step 5: Determine student achievement goal attainment Each teacher, using the results of an initial assessment, sets an annual goal for improving student achievement. The principal and the teacher meet to discuss data from the initial assessment and review the annual goal. A new goal is identified each year. The goal should be customized for the teaching assignment and for individual learners. The Goal Setting for Student Academic Progress Form is to be used for developing and assessing the teacher s annual goal. Student academic progress goals measure where the students are at the beginning of the year, where they are at mid-year, where they are at the end of the year, and what is the difference. Goals are developed early in the school year. The goals describe observable behavior and/or measurable results that would occur when a goal is achieved. The acronym SMART is a useful way to self-assess a goal s feasibility and worth. Specific: Measurable: Appropriate: Realistic: The goal is focused, for example, by content area, by learners needs. An appropriate instrument/measure is selected to assess the goal. The goal is within the teacher s control to effect change. The goal is feasible for the teacher. Time limited: The goal is contained within a single school year. Example Goal: A fourth grade team determines that their students performed well in mathematics last year, but not in reading. Therefore, they decide to focus the goal on reading. Each teacher creates his or her own goal based on the performance of the students in his or her classroom, but the goal area is decided as a grade level. - teacher sets an attainable goal, within reach but not too easy - teacher develops strategies to support goal attainment - strategies put into place, monitored, analyzed at the end of the year Example of a poor goal: In current school year, each student will make measurable progress on the STAR assessment. Each student will gain at least one year s growth in grade level equivalency. Example of a good goal: During the school year, my sixth grade physical education students will improve performance by 20% on each of the Presidential Fitness Test sub areas. Page 18
19 Goal Setting for Student Academic Progress Form Directions: This form is a tool to assist teachers in setting a goal that results in measurable learner progress. NOTE: When applicable, learner achievement/progress should be the focus of the goal. Teacher s Name Evaluator s Name Subject/Grade School Year Initial Goal Submission (due by September 15 to the evaluator) Setting (Describe population and special learning circumstances.) Content/Subject/Field Area (Area/topic addressed based on learner achievement, data analysis, or observational data) Baseline Data (What does current data show?) Please attach. Data attached Goal Statement (Describe what you want learners/program to accomplish.) Means for Attaining Goal (Strategies used to accomplish goal) Strategy Assessment Evidence Target Date/s Comments: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Page 19
20 Mid-Year Goal Review Describe goal progress and other relevant data. Mid/End of Year Goal Review Form Mid-year review conducted on Utilized multiple data sources for review Initials: (teacher) (evaluator) List data sources: Comments: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date End-of-Year Goal Review Appropriate Data Received Strategies used and data provided demonstrate appropriate Student Growth Yes No Goal Setting Indicators Sets acceptable, measurable, and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress based on baseline data Documents the progress of each student throughout the year Uses available performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and develop interim learning targets Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met Met Indicator Did Not Meet Indicator Comments: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Page 20
21 3. Teacher Selected Input (Choose at least one option: Teacher Documentation Log, Student Survey, or Self-Evaluation) 1. Teacher Documentation Log (highly recommended) The purpose of the Teacher Documentation Log is to provide evidence of performance related to specific standards. Evidence of Professional Development, Record of Extracurricular Activities, Evidence of Assessment for Learning, and other documents related to the Teacher Evaluation Standards may be included. These documents provide administrators with information they likely would not receive in an observation. Specifically, the Teacher Documentation Log provides the teacher with an opportunity for self-reflection, demonstration of quality work, and a basis for two-way communication with an administrator. The emphasis is on the quality of work, not the quantity of materials presented. Furthermore, the Teacher Documentation Log is used to organize the multiple data sources included in the teacher evaluation. The cover sheet should be placed at the front of the required and optional documents. Documentation is not required for all performance standards as other data sources may be used. Administrators and evaluators review the documentation log annually. Additionally, teachers in their probationary period will meet with administrators and/or evaluators to review their documentation log by the end of the first semester. The Teacher Documentation Log should be available at the request of the administrator and/or evaluator. A Documentation Log: is one component of a multi-source evaluation and complements the observation components of the teacher evaluation system prior to the summative evaluation, is a collection of artifacts that result from regular classroom instruction, may be kept as electronic files or in paper form (e.g. three ring binder, file folder), include the required documentation listed on the cover sheet, is a work in progress; it is to be updated regularly throughout the evaluation period (weekly/ monthly), should be available for review at administrator s request, should be user-friendly (neat, organized), remains in teacher s possession except when reviewed by the evaluator, belongs to the employee, and will be checked at least one time per year with feedback provided. Page 21
22 Teacher Documentation Log Teacher: School Year: - Standards Required Item Examples of Evidence Evidence Included 1. Professional Knowledge 2. Instructional Planning 3. Instructional Delivery No evidence is required in the Documentation Log Evidence of using data about student learning to guide planning and instruction No evidence is required in the Documentation Log Can include (but not required): Transcripts of coursework Professional Development certificates Annotated list of instructional activities Lesson/intervention plan Journals/notes that represent reflective thinking and professional growth Samples of innovative approaches developed by teacher Other Can include: Differentiation in lesson planning and practice Analysis of classroom assessment Data driven curriculum revision work Examples: - Sample lesson or unit plan - Course syllabus - Intervention plan - Substitute lesson plan - Annotated learning objectives Other Can include (but not required): Annotated photographs of class activities Handouts or sample work Video/audio samples of instructional units Other Page 22
23 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning Evidence of the use of baseline and periodic assessments Can include: Samples of baseline and periodic assessments given Samples of both formative and summative assessment Graphs or tables of student results Records within electronic curriculum mapping tool Examples: -Brief report describing your record keeping system and how it is used to monitor student progress 4. Assessment of and for student learning (continued) 5. Learning Environment Evidence of the use of baseline and periodic assessments No evidence is required in the Documentation Log - Copy of scoring rubrics - Photographs or photocopies of student work with written comments - Samples of educational reports, progress reports or letters prepared for parents or students - Copy of disaggregated analysis of student achievement scores on standardized test - Copy of students journals of self-reflection and selfmonitoring Other Can include (but not required): Student survey summary information List of classroom rules with brief explanation of the procedures used to develop and reinforce them Schedule of daily classroom routines Explanation of behavior management philosophy and procedures Other Page 23
24 6. Professionalism Evidence of : 7. Student Academic Progress Commitment to professional growth *Parent Communication Log *Student Progress Goal Setting Form Can include: ecord of participation in extracurricular activities and events ecord of professional development taken or given Examples of collaborative work with peers Evidence of communication with students, families, colleagues and community Examples: - Copy of classroom newsletter or other parent information documents - Sample copy of interim reports Other Student Achievement Goal Setting Document Revised at midterm and end of year R R Page 24
25 Or Student Surveys The purpose of the student survey is to collect information that will help teachers reflect on their practice (i.e., for formative evaluation); in other words, to provide feedback directly to the teacher for growth and development. The student survey may provide information that may not be accurately obtained in observations. Four different versions of the student survey are provided to reflect developmental differences. Teachers of grades K-8 administer the survey to the entire class. In situations where students change classes, teachers should administer surveys to at least two classes. Teachers of grades 9-12 administer the surveys to at least three classes. Teachers may add additional questions to the surveys at their discretion. Page 25
26 GRADES K-2 STUDENT SURVEY Directions: Teachers, please explain that you are going to read this sentence twice: As I read the sentence, color the face that describes how you feel about the sentence. Teacher School Year Example: I ride a school bus to school. 1. My teacher listens to me. 2. My teacher gives me help when I need it. 3. My teacher shows us how to do new things. 4. I know what I am supposed to do in class. 5. I am able to do the work in class. 6. I learn new things in my class Comments: Page 26
27 Grades 3-5 Student Survey Directions: Follow along as I read the statements. Respond to the statements by placing a check mark () beneath the response YES, SOMETIMES, or NO that best describes how you feel about the statement. Teacher s Name School Year Class Period YES SOMETIMES NO Example: I like listening to music. 1. My teacher listens to me. 2. My teacher gives me help when I need it. 3. My teacher shows us how to do new things. 4. My teacher encourages me to evaluate my own learning. 5. I am able to do the work in class. 6. I learn new things in my class. 7. I feel safe in this class. 8. My teacher uses many ways to teach. 9. My teacher explains how my learning can be used outside of school. 10. My teacher explains why I get things wrong on my work. 11. My teacher shows respect to all students. 12. My teacher demonstrates helpful strategies or skills for my learning. 13. There are opportunities to reflect on my learning in my class. 14. My teacher allows me to make some choices about my learning COMMENTS: Page 27
28 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Grades 6-8 Student Survey The purpose of this survey is to allow you to give your teacher ideas about how this class might be improved. Directions: DO NOT PUT YOUR NAME ON THIS SURVEY. Write your class period in the space provided. Listed below are several statements about this class. Indicate your agreement with each statement. If you strongly disagree, circle 1; if you strongly agree circle 5. If you wish to comment, please write your comments at the end of the survey. Teacher s Name School Year Class Period Example: I like listening to music My teacher creates a classroom environment that allows me to learn My teacher encourages me to evaluate my own learning My teacher allows me to demonstrate my learning in a variety of ways My teacher gives clear instructions My teacher shows respect to all students My teacher is available to help outside of class My teacher grades my work in a timely manner My teacher relates lesson to other subjects or the real world My teacher respects different opinions My teacher uses a variety of activities in class My teacher encourages all students to learn My teacher expects me to be successful My teacher is knowledgeable about the subject My teacher provides helpful feedback COMMENTS: Page 28
29 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Grades 9-12 Student Survey The purpose of this survey is to allow you to give your teacher ideas about how this class might be improved. Directions: DO NOT PUT YOUR NAME ON THIS SURVEY. Write your class period in the space provided. Listed below are several statements about this class. Indicate your agreement with each statement. If you strongly disagree, circle 1; if you strongly agree circle 5. If you wish to comment, please write your comments at the end of the survey. Teacher s Name School Year Class Period Example: I like listening to music In this class, my teacher 1. gives clear instructions treats everyone fairly is available for help outside of class time clearly states the objectives for the lesson grades my work in a reasonable time relates lesson to other subjects or the real world allows for and respects different opinions encourages all students to learn uses a variety of activities in class communicates in a way I can understand manages the classroom with a minimum of disruptions shows respect to all students consistently enforces disciplinary rules in a fair manner makes sure class time is used for learning is knowledgeable about his/her subject area clearly defines long-term assignments (such as projects) sets high expectations helps me reach high expectations assigns relevant homework communicates honestly with me COMMENTS: Page 29
30 Student Survey Summary Directions: Summarize according to your best judgment. At the secondary level, results may be analyzed by class, subject, grade, etc., and reported as appropriate. Copies of Summary forms must be submitted to Principals at final evaluation conference. Teacher s Name: Grade: Subject: Survey form used: Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades How many surveys did you distribute? 2. How many completed surveys were returned? 3. What is the percentage of completed questionnaires you received (#1 divided into #2)? percent Student Satisfaction Analysis 4. Describe your survey population(s) (i.e., list appropriate demographic characteristics such as grade level and subject for students). 5. List factors that might have influenced the results (e.g., survey was conducted near time of report cards or progress reports). 6. Analyze survey responses and answer the following questions: A) What did students perceive as your major strengths? B) What did students perceive as your major weaknesses? C) How can you use this information for continuous professional growth? Page 30
31 Or Self-Evaluation Self-evaluation is a process by which teachers judge the effectiveness and adequacy of their performance, effects, knowledge, and beliefs for the purpose of self-improvement. When teachers think about what worked, what did not work, and what type of changes they might make to be more successful, the likelihood of knowing how to improve and actually make improvements increases dramatically. Evidence suggests that self-evaluation is a critical component of the evaluation process and is strongly encouraged. A sample Teacher Self-Evaluation Form is provided. Teachers are faced with a dynamic context in which to apply their knowledge, skills, and abilities. What worked last year may not work this year for a variety of reasons, some of which are outside the teachers control. When teachers take the time to think about how they might improve their delivery, instructional strategies, content, and so forth, they discover ways to make their practice more effective, which, in turn, may impact student learning. Aiarasian and Gullickson (1985) offered several strategies to enhance teachers self-evaluation. Figure 3.5: Strategies to Enhance Self-Evaluation Self-reflection tools: These involved check lists, questionnaires, and rating scales which are completed by the teacher to evaluate performance in terms of beliefs, practice, and outcomes. Media recording and analysis: Audio and video recordings provide a useful method for the teachers and their peers to review and analyze a teacher s performance. Student feedback: Surveys, journals, and questionnaires can provide a teacher with the students perspective. Teacher portfolio: Teachers have an opportunity for self-evaluation as they collect and analyze the various artifacts for their portfolio. Student performance data: Teachers can assess their instructional effectiveness by using test results, projects, essays, and so forth. External peer observation: Colleagues, peers, and administrators can provide useful feedback on particular aspects of another teacher s behavior. Journaling: Teachers can identify and reflect on classroom activities, needs, and successes by keeping track of classroom activities or events. Collegial dialogue/experience sharing/joint problem solving: By collaborating on strategies, procedures, and perceptions, teachers are exposed to the practices of colleagues, which can serve as a catalyst for them to examine their own practices. Page 31
32 Teacher Self-Evaluation Form Directions: Teachers should use this form reflect on the effectiveness and adequacy of their practice based on each performance standard. Please refer to the performance indicators for examples of behaviors exemplifying each standard. Teacher s Name Date 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: 2. Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: 3. Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: Page 32
33 5. Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, studentcentered environment that is conducive to learning. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: 6. Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: 7. Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. Areas of strength: Areas needing work/strategies for improving performance: Essential Teaching Strategies Implement effective classroom management Differentiate instruction. Encourage active learning. Give prompt feedback, Communicate high expectations. Show concern and respect for students. Demonstrate high expectations for student learning. Provide appropriate assessment and feedback. Communicate clear goals and intellectual challenge. Use data to guide instruction for all students. Page 33
34 Teacher Interim Performance Report (completed with probationary contract and specific continuing contract teachers) Teacher Grade/Subject School Year(s) School Directions: Evaluators use this form to maintain a record of evidence documented for each teacher performance standard. Evidence can be drawn from formal observations, informal observations, portfolio review, and other appropriate sources. This form should be maintained by the evaluator during the course of the evaluation cycle. This report is shared at a meeting with the teacher held within appropriate timelines. Strengths: Areas of Improvement: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Page 34
35 Teacher Interim Performance Report 1. Professional Knowledge: The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards. Integrates key content elements and facilitates students use of higher level thinking skills in instruction. Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real world experiences and applications. Demonstrates an accurate knowledge of the subject area(s) taught. Comments: Demonstrates skills relevant to the subject area(s) taught. Bases instruction on goals that reflect high expectations and an understanding of the subject. Demonstrates an understanding of the intellectual, social, emotional, and physical development of the age group. Communicates clearly and checks for understanding. Evident Not Evident 2. Instructional Planning: The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Uses student learning data to guide planning. Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and transitions. Plans for differentiated instruction. Comments: Aligns lesson objectives to the school s curriculum and student learning needs. Develops appropriate long- and short-range plans and adapts plans when needed. Evident Not Evident 3. Instructional Delivery: The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Engages and maintains students in active learning. Builds upon students existing knowledge and skills. Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Comments: Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Communicates clearly and checks for understanding. Evident Not Evident 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning: The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. Uses pre-assessment data to develop expectations for students, to differentiate instruction, and to document learning. Involves students in setting learning goals and monitoring their own progress. Uses a variety of assessment strategies and instruments that are valid and appropriate for the content and for the student population. Aligns student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks. Comments: Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes and uses grading practices that report final mastery in relationship to content goals and objectives. Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes to inform, guide, and adjust students learning. Gives constructive and frequent feedback to students on their learning. Evident Not Evident Page 35
36 5. Learning Environment: The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. Arranges the classroom to maximize learning while providing a safe environment. Establishes clear expectations, with student input, for classroom rules and procedures early in the school year, and enforces them consistently and fairly. Maximizes instructional time and minimizes disruptions. Establishes a climate of trust and teamwork by being fair, caring, respectful, and enthusiastic. Comments: Promotes cultural sensitivity. Respects students diversity, including language, culture, race, gender, and special needs. Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and responses. Maximizes instructional learning time by working with students individually as well as in small groups or whole groups. Evident Not Evident 6. Professionalism: The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Collaborates and communicates effectively within the school Works in a collegial and collaborative manner with community to promote students well-being and success. administrators, other school personnel, and the community. Adheres to federal and state laws, school policies, and ethical Builds positive and professional relationships with guidelines. parents/guardians through frequent and effective Incorporates learning from professional growth opportunities communication concerning students progress. into instructional practice. Serves as a contributing member of the school s professional Sets goals for improvement of knowledge and skills. learning community through collaboration with teaching Engages in activities outside the classroom intended for colleagues. school and student enhancement. Demonstrates consistent mastery of standard oral and written English in all communication. Comments: Evident Not Evident 7. Student Academic Progress: The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. Sets acceptable, measurable, and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress based on baseline data. Documents the progress of each student throughout the year. Comments: Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met, including the state-provided growth measure when available as well as other multiple measures of student academic progress. Uses available performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and develop interim learning targets. Evident Not Evident Page 36
37 Teacher Summative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Assessment of performance quality occurs only at the summative evaluation stage, which comes at the end of the evaluation cycle (i.e., one-year for probationary teachers, three years for continuing contract teachers). The ratings for each performance standard are based on multiple sources of information and are completed only after pertinent data from all sources are reviewed. The integration of data provides the evidence used to determine the performance ratings for the summative evaluations for all teachers. There are two major considerations in assessing job performance during summative evaluation: 1) the actual teacher performance standards, and 2) how well the standards are performed. The performance standards and performance indicators provide a description of well-defined teacher expectations. Category Description Definition Highly The teacher performing at this level consistently exhibits behaviors that have a strong Effective maintains performance, positive impact on learners and the school climate accomplishments, and behaviors that serves as a role model to others consistently and considerably surpass sustains high performance over a period of time the established standard. This rating is reserved for performance that is truly exemplary and done in a manner that exemplifies the school s mission and goals. Effective The teacher meets the standard in a manner that is consistent with the school s mission and goals. meets the requirements contained in the job description as expressed in the evaluation criteria demonstrates willingness to learn and apply new skills exhibits behaviors that have a positive impact on learners and the school climate Needs Improvement The teacher often performs below the established standard or in a manner that is inconsistent with the school s mission and goals. requires support in meeting the standards results in less than quality work performance leads to areas for teacher improvement being jointly identified and planned between the teacher and evaluator Unacceptable The teacher consistently performs below the established standard or in a manner that is inconsistent with the school s mission and goals. does not meet the requirements contained in the job description as expressed in the evaluation criteria may result in the employee not being recommended for continued employment Page 37
38 Performance Rubrics and Summative Evaluation Evaluators make judgments about performance of the seven teacher standards based on all available evidence. After collecting information gathered through observation, goal setting, student performance measures, and other appropriate information sources, the evaluator applies a four-level rating scale to evaluate a teacher s performance on all teacher expectations for the summative evaluation. Therefore, the summative evaluation represents where the preponderance of evidence exists, based on various data sources. The results of the evaluation must be discussed with the teacher at a summative evaluation conference. Summative evaluations should be completed in compliance with the Code of Virginia and school division policy. For teachers with continuing contract status, evaluations take place at the end of the three year evaluation cycle. However, if a teacher with continuing contract status is not meeting expectations (at any point in the cycle) or is fulfilling a performance improvement plan, the evaluation cycle will vary. Summative evaluation for teachers with continuing contract status is based on all applicable data collected during the evaluation cycle. Summative ratings apply the rating for each of the seven performance expectations, with the most significant weight given to Standards 3 instructional delivery, and 7 - student academic progress. Effective teaching is indicated through the delivery of instruction provided in the classroom that leads to student s academic progress. Research indicates the difference in effective or ineffective teaching lays in the manner teachers demonstrate their knowledge, planning, and skills in their classrooms. This is observable through observation or student achievement data. The indicator rating is a 4 point Likert-Type scale using numbers 1 through 4 that derive a rating for each standard. Highly Effective: 4 Effective: 3 Needs Improvement: 2 Unacceptable: 1 Standards ratings fall within a scale representing the four categories: Highly Effective: Effective: Needs Improvement: Unacceptable: Weighted Percentage of Standards: Percentage contribution to the summative Teacher Performance Standard rating Standard 1 Professional Knowledge 5% Standard 2 Instructional Planning 5% Standard 3 Instructional Delivery 20% Standard 4 Assessment of & for Student Learning 10% Standard 5 Learning Environment 10% Standard 6 Professionalism 10% Standard 7 Student Academic Progress 40% Page 38
39 Teacher Summative Performance Report Directions: Evaluators use this form prior to April 15 to provide the teacher with an assessment of performance. The teacher should be given a copy of the form at the end of the evaluation cycle. Teacher Grade/Subject Contract Status Probationary Continuing Contract School Year(s) School Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, & the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Comprehensive knowledge of the adopted curriculum & use of the current pacing guide is consistently evident in planning and practice. Additionally, connections to other subject areas, prior knowledge and real world application is evident. Accurate knowledge and relevant skills of the subject matter is consistently evident in planning and practice. Additionally, goals that reflect high expectations, integrate key content and facilitate students use of higher level thinking are evident. Understanding of intellectual, social, emotional and physical development of students and incorporation of that understanding into instruction is consistently evident in planning and practice. Additionally, differentiated instruction based on students developmental needs is evident. Knowledge of the adopted curriculum & use of the current pacing guide is consistently evident in planning and practice. Accurate knowledge and relevant skills of the subject matter is consistently evident in planning and practice. Goals that facilitate students use of higher level thinking are also evident. Understanding of intellectual, social, emotional and physical development of students and incorporation of that understanding into instruction is consistently evident in planning and practice. Knowledge of the adopted curriculum & use of the current pacing guide is occasionally evident in planning and practice. Accurate knowledge and relevant skills of the subject matter is occasionally evident in planning and practice. Understanding of intellectual, social, emotional and physical development of students is occasionally evident in planning and practice. Knowledge of the adopted curriculum & use of the current pacing guide is not evident in planning and practice. Accurate knowledge and relevant skills of the subject matter is not evident in planning and practice. Understanding of intellectual, social, emotional and physical development of students is not evident in planning and practice. Page 39
40 Performance Standard 2: Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, & data to meet the needs of all students. Alignment with subject SOL & with SOL assessment is consistently evident in planning. Additionally, there is evidence that planning offers multiple opportunities to cover essential knowledge using higher level thinking skills. Time for pacing, content mastery and transition is consistently evident in planning. Additionally, lesson objectives aligned to both curriculum and student learning needs are evident. Differentiated instruction using a variety of instructional strategies that break down complex tasks & address all learning needs, styles, & interests is consistently evident in planning. Additionally, small group instructional planning is evident. Use of an effective mix of high-quality, multicultural learning resources & technology that directly support instructional objectives is consistently evident in planning. Additionally, focus on students being actively engaged with materials and resources are evident. Long and short range plans are clear. There is consistent evidence that plans are guided by student learning data and adapted as needed to master content and to reach goals. Additionally, student involvement in data process is evident in planning. Alignment with subject SOL & with SOL assessment is consistently evident in planning. Time for pacing, content mastery and transition is consistently evident in planning. Differentiated instruction using a variety of instructional strategies that break down complex tasks & address all learning needs, styles, & interests is consistently evident in planning. Use of an effective mix of high-quality, multicultural learning resources & technology that directly support instructional objectives is consistently evident in planning. Long and short range plans are clear. There is consistent evidence that plans are guided by student learning data and adapted as needed to master content and to reach goals. Alignment with subject SOL is occasionally evident in planning. Time for pacing and content mastery and transition is occasionally evident in planning. Differentiated instruction using a variety of instructional strategies that address learning needs is occasionally evident in planning. Use of a variety of learning resources & technology that directly support instructional objectives is occasionally evident in planning. Long and short range plans are vague. There is some evidence that plans are guided by student learning data to reach goals. Alignment with subject SOL & with SOL assessment is not evident in planning. Time for pacing, content mastery and transition is not evident in planning. Differentiated instruction using a variety of instructional strategies that address learning needs is not evident in planning. Use of a variety of learning resources & technology that directly support instructional objectives is not evident in planning. Long and short range plans are unclear. There is no evidence that plans are guided by student learning data to reach goals. Page 40
41 Performance Standard 3: Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher engages and maintains students in active learning & higher level thinking activities and builds upon students existing knowledge and skills. Additionally, there is evidence of opportunities for student choice. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher successfully reaches students by skillfully differentiating & scaffolding instruction to meet students needs. Additionally, instructional grouping is evident. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons by using a variety of highly effective instructional strategies, materials, and resources to involve & motivate students. Additionally, differentiated grouping is evident. There is consistent evidence that teacher uses multiple forms of instructional technology to enhance student learning. Additionally, there is evidence that students use technology tools to facilitate higher order learning activities. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher communicates and presents material clearly & explicitly and checks for understanding. Additionally, there is evidence that well chosen examples & vivid, appropriate language are used. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher engages and maintains students in active learning & higher level thinking activities and builds upon students existing knowledge and skills. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher successfully reaches students by skillfully differentiating & scaffolding instruction to meet students needs. There are multiple sources of evidence that teacher reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons by using a variety of highly effective instructional strategies, materials, and resources to involve & motivate students. There is consistent evidence that teacher uses multiple forms of instructional technology to enhance student learning. There is evidence that teacher communicates and presents material clearly & explicitly and checks for understanding. There is some evidence that teacher engages and maintains students in active learning & higher level thinking activities and builds upon students existing knowledge and skills. There is some evidence that teacher reaches students by differentiating & scaffolding instruction to meet students needs. There is some evidence that teacher reinforces learning goals throughout lessons by using a variety of effective instructional strategies, materials and resources. There is some evidence that teacher uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. There is some evidence that teacher attempts to communicate and present material clearly & explicitly and to check for understanding. There is no evidence that teacher engages and maintains students in active learning. There is no evidence that teacher successfully reaches students by skillfully differentiating & scaffolding instruction to meet students needs. There is no evidence that teacher reinforces learning goals throughout lessons by using a variety of effective instructional strategies, materials and resources. There is no evidence that teacher uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. There is no evidence that teacher communicates and presents material clearly & explicitly and checks for understanding. Page 41
42 Performance Standard 4: Assessment of & for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, & uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content & delivery methods, & provide timely feedback to both students & parents throughout the school year. Alignment of student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks using a variety of assessment strategies and instruments is consistently evident in assessment reports. Additionally, student involvement in setting goals and monitoring progress is evident. Use of assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes and use of grading practices that report final mastery of goals is consistently evident. Additionally, student involvement in collecting data and monitoring progress is evident. Analysis and charting of data, drawing action conclusions and impacting student growth is consistently evident in reports and planning. Collaboration with colleagues is evident. Additionally, student involvement in data analysis is evident. Reflection on what worked & what didn t to continuously improve instruction is evident in reports and planning. Use of pre- & post-assessment data to develop expectations, to differentiate instruction and to document learning is consistently evident in planning. Additionally, providing constructive and frequent feedback to student on their learning is evident. Alignment of student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks using a variety of assessment strategies and instruments is consistently evident in assessment reports. Use of assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes and use of grading practices that report final mastery of goals is consistently evident. Analysis and charting of data, drawing action conclusions and impacting student growth is consistently evident in reports and planning. Collaboration with colleagues is evident. Reflection on what worked & what didn t to continuously improve instruction is evident in reports and planning. Use of pre- & post-assessment data to develop expectations, to differentiate instruction and to document learning is consistently evident in planning. Alignment of student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks is somewhat evident in assessment reports. Use of assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes is somewhat evident. Analysis and charting of data, drawing action conclusions and impacting student growth is somewhat evident in reports and planning. Reflection on what worked & what didn t to continuously improve instruction is somewhat evident in reports and planning. Alignment of student assessment with established curriculum standards and benchmarks is not evident in assessment reports. Use of assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes is not evident. Analysis and charting of data, drawing action conclusions and impacting student growth is not evident in reports and planning. Reflection on what worked & what didn t to continuously improve instruction is not evident in reports and planning. Page 42
43 Performance Standard 5: Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, & procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning Use of direct, specific, consistent communication & enforcement of very high expectations is consistently evident. Additionally, consistent reinforcement of positive behaviors is evident. Classroom arrangements and classroom rules that maximize learning while providing a safe environment are consistently evident. Additionally, a classroom arrangement that facilitates movement and active participation of students is evident. A climate of trust and teamwork is consistently evident in the classroom. Characteristics of fairness, caring, respectfulness and enthusiasm are evident. Additionally, active listening and careful attention to students needs and responses are evident. Respect for students diversity, including language, culture, race, gender and special needs is consistently evident. Additionally, promotion of cultural sensitivity is evident. Use of routines and procedures that maximize instructional time and minimize disruption is consistently evident. Additionally, clear expectations that include student input for rules and procedures are evident. Use of direct, specific, consistent communication & enforcement of very high expectations is consistently evident. Classroom arrangements and classroom rules that maximize learning while providing a safe environment are consistently evident. A climate of trust and teamwork is consistently evident in the classroom. Characteristics of fairness, caring, respectfulness and enthusiasm are evident. Respect for students diversity, including language, culture, race, gender and special needs is consistently evident. Use of routines and procedures that maximize instructional time and minimize disruption is consistently evident. Use of consistent communication & enforcement of high expectations is sometimes evident. Classroom arrangements and classroom rules that provide a safe environment are sometimes evident. A climate of trust and teamwork is sometimes evident in the classroom. Respect for students diversity is sometimes evident. Use of routines and procedures that maximize instructional time is sometimes evident. Use of consistent communication & enforcement of high expectations is not evident. Classroom arrangements and classroom rules that provide a safe environment are not evident. A climate of trust and teamwork is not evident in the classroom. Respect for students diversity is not evident. Use of routines and procedures that maximize instructional time is not evident. Page 43
44 Performance Standard 6: Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, & takes responsibility for & participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Consistent adherence to federal and state laws, school and division policies and ethical guidelines is consistently evident. Additionally, respect of colleagues, administration, other school personnel and the community is evident. Effective collaboration and communication within the school community that promotes students wellbeing and success is consistently evident. Additionally, there is evidence that the teacher is a contributing member of the school s professional learning community through collaboration with teaching colleagues. Positive and professional relationships with parents/guardians are consistently evident through a variety of frequent and effective communications concerning students progress. Additionally, consistent mastery of standard oral and written English is evident in communications. Professional goals for improvement of knowledge & skills are consistently evident. Use of new knowledge & skills to enhance professional practice is evident. Additionally, engagement in activities outside the classroom to enhance student learning is evident. Consistent adherence to federal and state laws, school and division policies and ethical guidelines is consistently evident. Effective collaboration and communication within school community that promotes students well-being and success is consistently evident. Positive and professional relationships with parents/guardians are consistently evident through a variety of frequent and effective communications concerning students progress. Professional goals for improvement of knowledge & skills are consistently evident. Use of new knowledge & skills to enhance professional practice is evident. Adherence to federal and state laws, school and division policies and ethical guidelines is not consistently evident. Collaboration and communication within school community that promotes students well-being and success is somewhat evident. Professional relationships with parents/guardians are somewhat evident through communication concerning students progress. Professional goals for improvement of knowledge & skills are somewhat evident. Adherence to federal and state laws, school and division policies and ethical guidelines is not evident. Collaboration and communication within school community that promotes students well-being and success is not evident. Professional relationships with parents/guardians are not evident through communication concerning students progress. Professional goals for improvement of knowledge & skills are not evident. Page 44
45 Performance Standard 7: Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, & appropriate student academic progress; multiple measures of student progress data is to be considered. Acceptable, measurable and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress that are based on baseline data are consistently evident. Additionally, there is evidence that students are involved in the goal setting process. Documentation of the progress of each student throughout the year is consistently evident. Additionally, there is evidence students are involved in the documentation process. Use of performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and to develop interim learning targets is consistently evident. Additionally, there is evidence that students are involved in using data to improve achievement. Multiple data sources showing that achievement goals have been met are consistently evident. Additionally, there is evidence that students are involved in the process. Acceptable, measurable and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress that are based on baseline data are consistently evident. Documentation of the progress of each student throughout the year is consistently evident. Use of performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and to develop interim learning targets is consistently evident. Multiple data sources showing that achievement goals have been met are consistently evident. Acceptable, measurable and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress that are based on baseline data are occasionally evident. Documentation of the progress of each student throughout the year is occasionally evident. Use of performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and to develop interim learning targets is occasionally evident. Multiple data sources showing that achievement goals have been met are occasionally evident. Acceptable, measurable and appropriate achievement goals for student learning progress that are based on baseline data are not evident. Documentation of the progress of each student throughout the year is not evident. Use of performance outcome data to continually document and communicate student academic progress and to develop interim learning targets is not evident. Multiple data sources showing that achievement goals have been met are not evident. Research shows clearly that a person must be engaged to learn. People learn by actively participating in observing, speaking, writing, listening, thinking, drawing, and doing. Learning is enhanced when a person sees potential implications, applications, and benefits to others. Learning builds on current understanding (including misconceptions!). Page 45
46 Evaluation Summary Teacher s name: School year: School: Subject area: Evaluator: Position: RATINGS ON INDIVIDUAL RUBRICS: Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge.05 Performance Standard 2: Instructional Planning.05 Performance Standard 3: Instructional Delivery.20 Performance Standard 4: Assessment of & for Student Learning.10 Performance Standard 5: Learning Environment.10 Performance Standard 6: Professionalism.10 Performance Standard 7: Student Academic Progress.40 Added Summative Total: OVERALL SUMMATIVE Rating: Highly Effective: Effective: Needs Improvement: Unacceptable: OVERALL COMMENTS BY SUPERVISOR: OVERALL COMMENTS BY TEACHER: Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date (The teacher s signature indicates that he or she has seen & discussed the evaluation; it does not necessarily denote agreement with the report.) A review of this summative assessment by a central office administrator can be requested in writing if two or more standards are rated needs improvement or lower. This written request should be submitted to your principal within five (5) working days after receiving this assessment who will forward to their level supervisor. Page 46
47 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN If a teacher s performance does not meet the expectations established by the performance standards, the teacher will be placed on a Performance Improvement Plan. A Performance Improvement Plan is designed to support a teacher in addressing areas of concern through targeted supervision and additional resources. A Performance Improvement Plan may be used by an evaluator at any point during the year for a teacher whose professional practice would benefit from additional support. Additionally, a Performance Improvement Plan is implemented if one of the following scenarios occurs: two or more performance standards on the interim report are not evident; a rating of Needs Improvement on two or more performance standards on the summative report; or a rating of Unacceptable on one or more performance standards or an overall rating of Unacceptable On the summative report. Implementation of Performance Improvement Plan When a teacher is placed on a Performance Improvement Plan, the evaluator must: a) provide written notification to the teacher of the area(s) of concern that need(s) to be addressed within five (5) working days of the interim or summative evaluation conference; b) formulate a Performance Improvement Plan in conjunction with the teacher; and c) review the results of the Performance Improvement Plan with the teacher within established timelines. Assistance may include: assistance from a curriculum or program coordinator; support from a professional peer or supervisor; conferences, classes, and workshops on specific topics; and/or; other resources to be identified. Page 47
48 Performance Improvement Plan (Required for a Teacher Placed on a Performance Improvement Plan) Teacher School Year Grade/Subject School Evaluator Performance Standard Number Performance Deficiencies Within the Standard to be Corrected Resources/Assistance Provided; Activities to be Completed by the Employee Target Dates Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date (The teacher s signature denotes receipt of this form, and acknowledgment that the evaluator has notified the employee of unacceptable performance.) Page 48
49 Performance Improvement Plan Assessment Teacher School Year Grade/Subject School Evaluator Performance Standard Number Performance Deficiencies Within the Standard to be Corrected Comments Review Dates Final recommendation based on outcome of Improvement Plan: The performance deficiencies have been satisfactorily corrected: The teacher is no longer on a Performance Improvement Plan. Progress has been made toward correction of identified deficiencies, but additional correction is needed. The teacher will continue to be on a Performance Improvement Plan until all performance deficiencies have been satisfactorily corrected. The deficiencies were not corrected: teacher is recommended for non-renewal/dismissal. Teacher s Name Teacher s Signature Date Reviewed Observer s Name Observer s Signature Date Reviewed (Signature denotes this review occurred, not necessarily agreement with the final recommendation.) Page 49
Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System The Norfolk Public Schools does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, age, political affiliation, veteran
Radford City Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System. Adopted 2012
Radford City Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System Adopted 2012 Forward The Radford City Teacher Evaluation Manual and system was developed in response to the updated Guidelines for Uniform Performance
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers
Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120 Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Approved by the Virginia Board of Education
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Alexandria Township Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Revised: 09/21/2011) Table of Contents Part I: Introduction and Process Introduction...5 Purposes...5 Identifying Teacher Performance
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK College, Career Career & Citizen-Ready! Table of Contents Part 1: Introduction Purpose Part 2: Standards of Effective Teaching Performance Standards Sample Performance
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Winchester Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System Revised July 1, 2012 Winchester Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Handbook Table of Contents Part I: Introduction and Process Introduction...4
!"#$%&'( "!"#$!%&& '''!#()*!+!,,& )!%'-%."+#!& '*"/0"()-+&!1,(!.& & 23456778& 9:;9<9:;=& & &
!"#$%&'( "!"#$!%&& '''!#()*!+!,,& )!%'-%."+#!& '*"/0"()-+&!1,(!.& & 23456778& 9:;9
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES The Code of Virginia 22.1253.13.5 states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education
Page County Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System. Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Teacher Performance Evaluation System IMPLEMENTED: 2012-2013 REVISED: October 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the Page County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Committee and the building administrators
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 2012-2013. One Team, One Priority: Student Success!
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 2012-2013 One Team, One Priority: Student Success! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2012-2013 Teacher Evaluation System for Mecklenburg County
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Franklin City Public Schools REVISED 9/14 Teacher Performance Evaluation System ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Franklin City Public Schools thanks the following people for their conscientious and thoughtful efforts in
Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form
Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form (Once participants have filled in and discussed the blank Formal Classroom Observation Form, facilitators should hand out copies of this completed form) August
Arlington Public Schools
Arlington Public Schools Approved 2012 Updated 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Arlington Public Schools (APS) acknowledge staff who participates each year on the Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee. We also thank
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Richmond City Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Revised December 12, 2012) Effective July 1, 2012 1 Richmond City Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System Overview Teacher Effectiveness Student Achievement Student Achievement Stronge Evaluation System Effectiveness is the goal. Evaluation is merely
STRONGE. Educational Specialist Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
STRONGE Educational Specialist Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System HANDBOOK 2012-2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Consultant James H. Stronge, Ph.D. Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting,
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Handbook
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Handbook Implemented 2012-2013 Revised June 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the administrators and teachers of Staunton City Schools and the Staunton City Schools
How to Upload Artifacts to MyLearningPlan.com
How to Upload Artifacts to MyLearningPlan.com One of the key benefits of the Stronge evaluation system is that it allows educators to have a significant voice in their own evaluation. In the past an employee
NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
Handbook on the OSAC/AASSA Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Handbook on the OSAC/AASSA Teacher Performance Evaluation System 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to express our grateful appreciation to the Overseas Schools Advisory Committee (OSAC) for their generous funding
Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics
Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics The Teacher Performance Appraisal includes performance rubrics designed to guide self-assessment and reflection based on professional
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Fredericksburg City Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System 2012-2013(6/27/12) 5-1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Teacher Evaluation System for the Fredericksburg City Public Schools (FCPS) was developed through
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Principals
Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120 Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Principals Approved by the Virginia Board of Education
Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation
Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation The growth and learning of children is the primary responsibility of those who teach in our classrooms and lead our schools. Student growth and learning can
Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook
Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook Revised May, 2013 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Individuals contributing to the revision of the Bedford County Public School s Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook include:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook For Teacher Professional Development Offerings Modified for use by the District and School
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR 2014-15 Process Manual Last Modified 8/25/14 The Mississippi State Board of Education, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Mississippi School of the
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Licensed Employee Appraisal System Enhancing Professional Practice Professional Domain Standards and Indicators Levels of Performance Rubric
TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure James Rumsey Technical Institute, a West Virginia state institution, is bound by Policy 5310, Performance Evaluation
Norfolk Public Schools Principal Performance Evaluation System
Norfolk Public Schools Principal Performance Evaluation System Norfolk Public Schools Principal Performance Evaluation System 2015-2016 Table of Contents The Norfolk Public Schools does not discriminate
International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School
International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School Philosophy Assessment is the process of collecting information from a variety of sources to measure student attainment
Wythe County Public Schools Comprehensive Plan 2013-2019
Wythe County Public Schools Comprehensive Plan 2013-2019 VISION Educating Students for Success in a Changing World MISSION The mission of Wythe County Public Schools, in partnership with our community,
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Speech Language Pathologist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher
ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers
ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Revised ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Introduction Central to the ADEPT system is a set of expectations for what teaching
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists Definition of an Effective Speech-Language Pathologist Effective speech-language pathologists are
Portfolio Guidelines: Practicum Year Northeastern University's CAGS Program in School Psychology* Revised May 2014
Portfolio Guidelines: Practicum Year Northeastern University's CAGS Program in School Psychology* Revised May 2014 Introduction: Definition and Purposes of the Portfolio All students are required to create
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards For every student in North Carolina, a knowledgeable, skilled compassionate teacher...a star in every classroom. As Approved by the State Board of Education
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents
St. Charles School District Growth Guide and Evaluation Documents 2014-2015 City of St. Charles School District MISSION The City of St. Charles School District will REACH, TEACH, and EMPOWER all students
Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook
Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Individuals contributing to the development of the Bedford County Public School s Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook include: Gary Carnot...Teacher,
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
L International Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System HANDBOOK i Stronge, 2012 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to express our grateful appreciation to the Overseas Schools Advisory
Special Education Master s Portfolio and Program Completion Guidebook
Special Education Master s Portfolio and Program Completion Guidebook Faculty/Advisor Contacts Dr. Warren White Program Spokesperson [email protected] Dr. Marilyn Kaff [email protected] Dr. Ann Knackendoffel
inchester Public Schools
inchester Public Schools SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION School Psychologist Evaluation SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION Introduction The licensed personnel who staff our classrooms who provide related services
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors Brooklyn Campus Long Island Campus 245 Clinton Avenue 155 West Roe Boulevard Brooklyn, NY
I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10
I. THE PLAN Professional employees will be grouped into four categories, or STAGES. Teacher evaluation occurs through a variety of activities: (1) required supervisory activities, (2) personalized supervisory
Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions
Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions The Core Functions and Indicators, which form the structure for the delivery and execution of (Illinois CSI) services, describe the big ideas or
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool
Greenville City Schools Teacher Evaluation Tool Table of Contents Introduction to Teacher Evaluation 2 Glossary 3 Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities 5 Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Self-Assessment 11
Handbook on the OSAC/AASSA. Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Handbook on the OSAC/AASSA Teacher Performance Evaluation System ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writing, printing, and distribution of this project were made possible thanks to a grant from the Overseas Schools Advisory
Principal Appraisal Overview
Improving teaching, leading and learning T e x a s P r i n c i p a l E va l u a t i o n S y s t e m Principal Appraisal Overview Design and Development a collaborative effort McREL International Texas
Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Chapter 1: Handbook Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Chapter 3: Fact Sheets Chapter 4: Research Synthesis Chapter 5: Endnotes for Handbook, Fact Sheets, and Research
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016 Table of Contents Preface... 5 The Ohio Standards for School Counselors... 5 Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Framework... 6 School Counselor Evaluation
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists STANDARD 1: School speech-language pathologists demonstrate leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and ethical practices. School Speech-Language
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Revised for 2014 2015 State Guidelines for ESEA Waiver & SB 290 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 255 Capitol St, NE, Salem, OR
Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program
Oak Park School District Administrator Evaluation Program Table of Contents Evaluation Purpose...1 Evaluation Timeline...2 Rubric for Instructional Administrator Standard 1...3 Standard 2...5 Standard
FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation
FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation A GUIDEBOOK FOR TEACHERS & ADMINISTRATORS 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Superintendent... iii Introduction...
Georgia Department of Education Teacher Keys Evaluation System Trainer Manual. Teacher Keys Evaluation System Handbook
Teacher Keys Evaluation System Handbook Pilot January-May 2012 Table of Contents Introduction to the Teacher Keys Evaluation System... 5 Part I: Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards... 7 Step 1:
North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators Standard 1: Instructional Technology Facilitators demonstrate leadership. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors This document is intended to inform school communities in recognizing the performance levels for key elements defined in the Teacher Rubric and
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP 6801 N. Yates Road, Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53217
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP 6801 N. Yates Road, Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53217 Department of Instructional Technology School of Education/College of Education and Leadership #92 Instructional Technology
Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on September 27, 2012. Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120
Advancing Virginia's Leadership Agenda Guidance Document: Standards and Indicators for School Leaders and Documentation for the Principal of Distinction (Level II) Administration and Supervision Endorsement
GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION &
GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION & Progress Monitoring Decisions about the effectiveness of an intervention must be based on data, not guesswork. Frequent, repeated measures of progress toward
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Key Components... 1 1. Core of Effective Practices... 1 2. Student Growth... 2 3. Evaluation Rating Criteria... 13 4. Teacher and Principal Involvement... 14 5.
How To Pass A Queens College Course
Education Unit Assessment Analysis Guide...committed to promoting equity, excellence, and ethics in urban schools and communities 1 Unit Assessment Analysis Guide Introduction Form 1: Education Unit Core
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Chapter 1: Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Overview Massachusetts has developed a blueprint outlining a single system of supports that is responsive
FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION HANDBOOK
FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION HANDBOOK A Resource for Teacher-Scale Employees Copyright 2010, Fairfax County Public Schools http://www.fcps.edu/dhr/employees/evaluations/index.htm
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation Teacher Consultant: Evaluator: Date: Domain 1: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning The teacher consultant uses a wide
GUIDANCE COUNSELOR JD LOCATOR: 3.09.1 Adopted:
Adopted: REPORTS TO: CLASSIFICATION: FLSA STATUS: TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: EVALUATION: Building Principal or Director Certified Exempt Salary and work year as reviewed and established annually by the Board
How To Be An Alternative School Guidance Counselor
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR Adopted: 12/07 Revised: 3/09 REPORTS TO: CLASSIFICATION: FLSA STATUS: TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: EVALUATION: Alternative School Principal Certified Exempt Salary and work
Setting Professional Goals*
Setting Professional Goals* Beginning teachers are often overwhelmed by the scope of their work and the day-to-day demands of classroom instruction. Stepping back from and reflecting upon their teaching
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Chandler Unified School District Teacher Performance Evaluation System Revised 2015-16 Purpose The purpose of this guide is to outline Chandler Unified School District s teacher evaluation process. The
Model for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation
Model for Instructional Improvement Teacher Evaluation Implemented 2008-09 Revised August 15, 2011 Table of Contents Vision and Mission Statements... 2 Teacher Evaluation Philosophy... 2 Purpose... 3 Objectives...
Standards for Quality Online Teaching
Standard 1 Standards for Quality Online Teaching The teacher plans, designs and incorporates strategies to encourage active learning, interaction, participation and collaboration in the online environment.
ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION, AND COMMUNICATION OF STUDENT LEARNING POLICY
ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION, AND COMMUNICATION OF STUDENT LEARNING CONTENTS POLICY PREAMBLE 1.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK 2.0 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT 3.0 CLASSROOM ASSIGNMENTS 4.0 FORMAL INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENTS AND EXTERNAL
08X540. School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473
NYSED/NYCDOE JOINT INTERVENTION TEAM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEDS Code/DBN: 08X540 School Name: School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473 Principal:
Delaware Performance Appraisal System
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Principals) Principal Practice Rubric Updated July 2015 1 INEFFECTIVE A. DEVELOPS
Teachers Demonstrate Leadership
STANDARD 1: Element A Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Teachers lead in their classrooms. -Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students - Accesses data
COBB KEYS SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RUBRIC WITH EXAMPLES OF TEACHER EVIDENCE
CURRICULUM AND PLANNING STANDARD (CP): The Special Education teacher makes decisions about planning that demonstrate an understanding of grade level content knowledge, specialized that addresses students
TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM HANDBOOK 2012-2013. Fairfax County Public Schools Department of Human Resources
TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM HANDBOOK 2012-2013 Fairfax County Public Schools Department of Human Resources August 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank members of the 2011-12 Fairfax County
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. List all of the program s learning outcomes: (regardless of whether or not they are being assessed this year) Learning Outcome 1
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: JASON DOLL, PHD, CHAIR, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY DATE: 10/03/14 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND DESCRIPTORS The following criteria and descriptors are
Educational Specialist Performance Evaluation System
Educational Specialist Performance Evaluation System GUIDEBOOK July 2012 Pilot Year 2012-2013 i Stronge, 2012 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Cooperative Educational Services Agency (CESA 6) Educational
Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook
Baltimore City Public School System Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook Department of Professional Development Performance-Based Evaluation October 2003 PBES Handbook (Revised 2003) i Table of Contents
1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.
SCORING RUBRIC Candidate: Supervisor: Cooperating Teacher: School: School District: Grade Level(s): PAA Administration Dates: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address
