The development of this ITS Communications Plan was a joint project of the Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO) and Kansas Department of

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The development of this ITS Communications Plan was a joint project of the Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO) and Kansas Department of"

Transcription

1

2 The development of this ITS Communications Plan was a joint project of the Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO) and Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT). Development of this ITS Communications Plan for the Topeka-Shawnee County Region was funded by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration through a Consolidated Planning Grant administered by KDOT. KDOT also supplied funding for this project, and local funding for this plan was supplied by the City of Topeka and Shawnee County.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITS Communications Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT INVOLVED AGENCIES EXISTING AND PLANNED ITS AND COMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES CITY OF TOPEKA SHAWNEE COUNTY KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (KDOT) OTHER STAKEHOLDERS OTHER COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS PROTOCOLS AND STANDARDS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK HIERARCHY BASELINE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Center-to-Center Communications Requirements Center-to-Field Communications Requirements COMMUNICATIONS ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS NETWORK ARCHITECTURE COMMUNICATIONS APPROACH Communication Approach Type 1 Centers Communication Approach Type 2 Centers COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGIES ASSESSMENT LAND-LINE SOLUTIONS Fiber Optic SONET on Fiber ATM on Fiber Ethernet on fiber Leased Line ISDN DSL T-Carrier ATM Internet WIRELESS SOLUTION GPRS Wi-Fi Communcations WiMax Mesh Networks RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMMUNICATIONS CENTER-TO-CENTER COMMUNICATIONS Essential Elements for Center-to-Center Communications CENTER-TO-FIELD COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE...51 Iteris, Inc. i

4 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.1: STUDY AREA FOR THE TOPEKA-SHAWNEE COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE...2 FIGURE 2.1: CITY OF TOPEKA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER...4 FIGURE 2.2: TOPEKA-SHAWNEE COUNTY REGION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS...5 FIGURE 2.3: CITY OF TOPEKA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM...9 FIGURE 2.4: PROPOSED 4.9 GHZ WI-FI COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK...10 FIGURE 3.1: AGENCY LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS CONCEPT...14 FIGURE 3.2: HIGH LEVEL TOPEKA-SHAWNEE COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CONCEPT...14 FIGURE 3.3: CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS - ALTERNATIVE FIGURE 3.4: CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS - ALTERNATIVE FIGURE 4.1: STAR NETWORK (EXAMPLE)...29 FIGURE 4.2: TREE NETWORK (EXAMPLE)...30 FIGURE 4.3: UNPROTECTED RING NETWORK (EXAMPLE)...30 FIGURE 4.4: PROTECTED RING NETWORK (EXAMPLE)...31 FIGURE 4.5: MESH NETWORK (EXAMPLE)...31 FIGURE 4.6: COMMUNICATIONS APPROACH TYPE 1 CENTERS...34 FIGURE 4.7: COMMUNICATIONS APPROACH TYPE 2 CENTERS...35 FIGURE 6.1: POTENTIAL FUTURE EXPANSION OF TOPEKA IT NETWORK...50 FIGURE 6.2: RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX...52 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1: COMMUNICATION SHARING NEEDS FOR STAKEHOLDERS...3 TABLE 3.1: POTENTIAL ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND TYPE OF DATA FOR STAKEHOLDERS...16 TABLE 6.1: SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY SUGGESTION FOR CENTER TO CENTER COMMUNICATIONS...45 Iteris, Inc. ii

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT), the Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority (TMTA), Shawnee County, and the City of Topeka, have sponsored the development of a Regional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Architecture for the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. The goal of the architecture is to answer questions such as: How can we make travel on our roadways safer, more secure and efficient? How can we make government services, such as transit and emergency response, more efficient? What can we do by working together, that we can't do as well on our own? The Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture will become a plan of projects for technologies, interagency collaboration, communication and technical integration in the Topeka- Shawnee County Region. The purpose of developing a Regional ITS Architecture is to illustrate and document regional integration so that planning and deployment can take place in an organized and coordinated fashion. The common thread for all agencies is the need to provide ITS solutions to transportation safety, congestion and security. This project will be conducted through 12 tasks with multiple milestones and deliverables. This deliverable presents the draft Communications Master Plan developed in support of Task 5 with the primary objective of assessing the adequacy of the existing and planned communication infrastructure in the region and contains the following primary actions: Perform communications inventory in concert with development of the overall system needs. Identify communications alternatives. Recommend communications strategies and concepts. Develop ITS Communications Plan. 1.1 Purpose of this Report This report identifies and documents an ITS communications network capable of connecting the agencies Transportation Management Centers (TMC) to the ITS field elements and sharing information between transportation agencies or other stakeholders in the region. Existing and planned communication inventory, the overall system needs, communications requirements, and alternative analysis provide a framework for the recommended ITS communications plan. Please note that this communications plan considers connection to a multitude of ITS systems deployed in the field. Its intent is not to complete a detailed systems design for each element. It is high level in nature, so that it will allow for the use of various technologies. A key element of the plan is to identify some of the opportunities that may be available, but it should not be considered a substitute for future communications analysis. As additional devices or systems Iteris, Inc. 1

6 are deployed, or as the need for data sharing and exchange between agencies progresses, each project should contain an analysis for detailed communications planning and design. 1.2 Involved Agencies The Steering Committee for the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture includes representatives from the Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT), Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority (TMTA), Shawnee County, and the City of Topeka. The Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture will encompass all major communities and interested organizations within Shawnee County. Figure 1.1 provides a map of the Topeka-Shawnee County project study area. Figure 1.1: Study Area for the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture From a communication needs stand point, these Stakeholders could be grouped into the following categories: 1. Stakeholders with traffic management, emergency operations or maintenance systems that will transmit and receive information through the communications network on a continuous basis Iteris, Inc. 2

7 2. Stakeholders that will transmit information to other Stakeholders only 3. Stakeholders that will receive information from other Stakeholders only 4. Stakeholders that will not transmit or receive information from other Stakeholders For the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture project, the communication needs for the project Stakeholders are summarized in Table 1.1. Table 1.1: Communication Sharing Needs for Stakeholders Transmit & Receive 1. City of Topeka (Traffic Operations TMC) 2. Shawnee County 911 Dispatch Center 3. KDOT-VTOC (Topeka Office) 4. City of Topeka (Transportation Operations Maintenance Operations) 5. Shawnee County Emergency Management Center Receive Only 1. Shawnee County Public Works 2. City of Topeka (Traffic Engineering) 3. City of Topeka Fire Department 4. Shawnee County Sheriff s Office 5. Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority 6. Kansas Highway Patrol 7. Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority 8. Washburn University 9. American Medical Response 10. St. Francis Health Center 11. Stormont-Vail Healthcare 12. Rural/Special Fire Departments 13. Public School Districts Transmit Only No Sharing 1. City of Topeka Police Department 2. Kansas Turnpike Authority 3. City of Topeka Public Works Call Center Iteris, Inc. 3

8 2.0 EXISTING AND PLANNED ITS AND COMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES The following sections describe existing communication resources in the area and the planned communications to be implemented shortly. 2.1 City of Topeka Traffic Signal System The City of Topeka maintains and operates approximately 182 traffic signals with 90 of these signals interconnected through fiber optic cable and operating in coordinated patterns during peak periods. The City utilizes PYRAMIDS traffic signal software system, by Econolite, to operate the 90 signals that are on-line. The PYRAMIDS workstation is located at the Topeka TMC, presented in Figure 2.1, located at 927 NW Harrison. Figure 2.1: City of Topeka Traffic Management Center Most of the City s traffic signal controllers are Type 170E, operate Wapiti controller firmware, and utilize the serial data port for communications. To date, the City has installed ten (10) Model 2070 traffic signal controllers, by Econolite, that operate OASIS controller software. The City s signalized intersections are illustrated in Figure 2.2. The City also maintains nine (9) traffic signals, one (1) school flasher for Shawnee County and two (2) KDOT signalized intersections in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. The County and KDOT signalized intersections are also illustrated in Figure 2.2. Iteris, Inc. 4

9 Figure 2.2: Topeka-Shawnee County Region Signalized Intersections Iteris, Inc. 5

10 Some of the major arterial corridors where a majority of the signalized intersections are located are noted below and illustrated in Figure 2.2. Wanamaker Road Topeka Boulevard Washburn Avenue 6 th Avenue 10 th Avenue 21 st Street The City is planning to upgrade all traffic signal controllers to Model 2070 controllers at a rate of 6 controllers per year. Currently, the City utilizes the serial data port for communications with the 2070 controllers, with the ultimate goal to utilize Ethernet communications. The current Model 2070 controllers are equipped with only a serial port. It is recommended that future Model 2070 controllers be equipped with both a serial and an Ethernet port as a cost savings measure versus a future upgrade to the Model 2070 controllers to install the Ethernet port. The City has a total of 52 intersections that use complete or partial video detection, as noted below. Peek Video Trak at 15 intersections to operate the full intersection Econolite Autoscope Solo Pro at 25 intersections to operate the full intersection Econolite Rack Vision hardware at 12 intersections to control one or more legs of an intersection but not the entire intersection Their current specification for video detection hardware is Econolite Autoscope equipment and they are in the middle of a program to remove all of the Peek Video Trak installations. The City uses Opticom Priority Control Systems, by 3M, for emergency vehicle signal preemption at two locations. Video Surveillance System The City of Topeka currently has two CCTV cameras installed and operational with one more planned, at the locations listed below: I-70 & Wanamaker 21 st & Wanamaker I-470 & Wanamaker (planned) The CCTV cameras are Vicon dome CCTV cameras that currently transmit analog video but are Internet Protocol (IP) upgradeable. The analog video is converted to IP video prior to transmission to the Topeka TMC and camera control is integrated into the PYRAMIDS traffic signal software system. The City, in association with KDOT, has plans to implement 14 additional CCTV cameras in Most of the cameras will be located at freeway interchanges in the Topeka Area and will be shared City/KDOT cameras. Iteris, Inc. 6

11 Fiber Optic Communications The City of Topeka has an extensive fiber optic network that is comprised of three communication systems, as described below. The fiber network is illustrated in Figure 2.3. Lightcore Telecom Fiber Network: Lightcore (formerly KMC) is a private telecommunications company that installed fiber optic cable in the Topeka Area. In support of this effort, Lightcore has provided 12 fiber strands for use by the City and Shawnee County. The 12 fiber strands are completely separate from Lightcore s fiber and the associated communication hardware is all City- or County-owned and maintained. Currently, all 12 strands are in use with 6 strands allocated for Traffic use, which are currently supporting backbone communications. The City s fiber strands are maintained by the Topeka IT department. Topeka School District Fiber Network: The school district fiber has allocated 24 fiber strands for Traffic use. Currently, all 24 fiber strands are in use by Traffic. This fiber is managed by the Topeka IT department. Traffic Fiber Network: The City has several distribution fiber runs that branch off of the backbone fiber to support the signalized intersections. The distribution fiber consists of 24 fiber strands. Typically, 2 to 4 of the fiber strands are in use. Public Safety Wireless Communications (Future) The City of Topeka is planning to deploy a WI-FI communications network that utilizes the 4.9 GHz Public Safety frequency. The FCC-approved 4.9 GHz license gives an agency the right to use the entire MHz frequency band. However, multiple agencies may receive licenses within the same geographic area, thus the possibility for interference exists. For the Topeka-Shawnee County Region, it is envisioned that the frequency will be collectively shared by Stakeholders. The system could support Ethernet communications to ITS field devices including traffic signal controllers, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Messages Signs (DMS), freeway sensors, etc., and can fill gaps in the fiber optic communications system. The envisioned coverage area provided by the wireless network is illustrated in Figure 2.4. The City also has a GDI 1200 baud wireless system throughout the downtown area. The system was abandoned when the fiber system was installed. However, several of the antennas are still mounted on the traffic signal poles. 2.2 Shawnee County Shawnee County owns 16 traffic signals, 9 of which are fully-operational signalized intersections. The remaining 7 traffic signals are flashing beacon installations. The City of Topeka maintains and operates all 9 County fully-operational signalized intersections and a school flasher. The Shawnee County signals maintained by City of Topeka are listed below and illustrated in Figure Block N Topeka Ave, "Pedestrian Activated Signal" (Off map) NW 46th St & N Topeka Ave, (Off map) SE 6th St (Old US 40) and SE Croco Rd SW 57th St and S Topeka Ave Iteris, Inc. 7

12 SW University Blvd and S Topeka Ave SW Gary Ormsby Dr and S Topeka Ave, (Off map) SE 29th St & SE Westedge Rd SE 29th St & SE Croco Rd, SE 45th St & SE Adams Rd These nine County signalized intersections are currently not on-line and the County has no immediate plans to bring them onto the network using fiber. The locations are too remote for the installation of fiber optic cable. However, the County may desire to connect to these locations in the future using wireless communications or other viable means of communications. Based on discussion with Shawnee County Staff, the two critical signalized intersections that warrant communications are noted below. 29 th and Croco 57 th and Topeka Shawnee County does not own any fiber optic network of its own. However, Shawnee County Emergency Communications currently uses 8 strands of City of Topeka fiber which extends from 215 SE 7 th Street to 1500 SW 8 th Street. Shawnee County currently has no video surveillance system but has plans to have access to the City of Topeka TMC system which could provide access to City cameras. Additionally, the County would like to see CCTV cameras installed at the two critical locations noted above. The Shawnee County Emergency Communications Center also has plans to provide preemption at signals for emergency vehicles. The Shawnee County Public Works Department would like to receive weather information from KDOT, the City, and Surface Systems, Inc. (SSI ). The Shawnee County emergency communications center also has plans to deploy a wireless hot spot next year in its parking lot (320 S. Kansas Avenue) to be used by County staff. This can also be used/shared to bring some of the outlying signal locations online. 2.3 Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) KDOT has 12 fiber strands leased by contract from Lightcore (Private Entity) that runs primarily on US 24 onto US 75 going southbound on US 75 to I-70. The focus of KDOT was to develop backbone communications for statewide communications using fiber connections to major cities (Kansas City, Wichita, and Topeka) in the state of Kansas. KDOT has plans to set up a statewide Virtual Operations Center (VOC) with no existing state infrastructure on the ground. KDOT envisions that the VOCs would interface with the regional TMC s, hosted by other agencies such as City of Topeka, in which KDOT can transmit and receive traffic related data. KANROAD will be a primary component of the VOC. KDOT also has plans to install Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) at major interchanges with I-70/I-470 in the City of Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Other planned programs include queue detection and congestion warning system on Wanamaker Road, DMS near the Polk-Quincy viaduct for construction, maintenance and incidents, DMS on US-75, and vehicle system detection along the freeways in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Iteris, Inc. 8

13 Figure 2.3: City of Topeka Communication System Iteris, Inc. 9

14 Figure 2.4: Proposed 4.9 GHz WI-FI Communications Network Iteris, Inc. 10

15 ITS Communication Plan 2.4 Other Stakeholders Below is a listing of communications systems employed by other Topeka-Shawnee County stakeholders. The City of Topeka Information Technology (IT) Department primarily maintains fiber optic and wireless communication networks for both the City of Topeka and Shawnee County. City of Topeka Police Department (TPD) currently has In-vehicle radio systems, Invehicle computers and Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) systems. TMTA utilizes two-way communications, security cameras on buses and demandresponsive trip scheduling software and plans to add AVL and mobile data terminals to demand-responsive vehicles. The City of Topeka construction and maintenance division currently has AVL, vehicle temperature probes and In-vehicle radio systems for maintenance vehicles. The City of Topeka Fire Department has a signal preemption device at Station 1 for fire vehicles. They plan to use more ITS devices in the future. The Shawnee County Sheriff s Department has speed trailers, mobile data terminals and GPS tracking on all its vehicles. They would like to automate notification process to all interested agencies in future which is currently done through person-person contact. Kansas Turnpike currently uses 800 MHz Trunked radio system for its communication system. They plan to utilize fiber along the turnpike in the future for possible traveler information components (signs, sensors, etc.). KTA currently reports roadway conditions into KANROADS (511 system) for providing traveler information. The Shawnee County Health Agency has a surveillance system which receives reports from schools, hospitals and major employers to administer and notify the public concerning health risks. Washburn University has its own dispatch center for all campus calls. They also currently have CCTV camera surveillance in some parking lots and are working on installing cameras in all parking lots. Washburn Police currently has no GPS on patrol vehicles but they do have mobile data terminals inside their patrol vehicles. Washburn University currently uses DMS for campus information and at Lee Arena for event notification, but not for traveler information. American Medical Response (AMR-Ambulance service) covers the entire region including transport for hospitals. They currently have computer aided dispatch and also use the 800 MHz system/400 MHz back up/paging system to contact other agencies during incidents. All AMR vehicles have GPS on them which are used for vehicle tracking purpose only. Iteris, Inc. 11

16 2.5 Other Communications Most agencies in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region are on the 800 MHz Trunked radio system. KDOT uses the radio system to communicate with maintenance and Kansas Highway Patrol (KHP). The Shawnee County Public Works Maintenance and Construction Operations (MCO) and emergency communications division also has an 800 MHz radio system and can communicate with Police and KHP. However, the City of Topeka MCO division is on a different radio system and currently can not communicate with agencies using the 800 MHz Trunked radio system. Iteris, Inc. 12

17 3.0 COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Prior to evaluating and planning the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network, it is first necessary to identify the requirements for the communication between traffic management or operation centers and their corresponding field elements and the data transmission requirements between involved agencies. The focus of this section is to establish a set of communication requirements for the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network. 3.1 Protocols and Standards One of the primary goals for the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Communications Plan is to establish common communications and infrastructure protocols for all current and future ITS projects in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. To achieve this goal, the first step is to bring Topeka-Shawnee County into compliance with some of the more broadly accepted National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) standards. NTCIP is a family of communications protocols and data definition standards that have been designed for use in all types of systems dealing with the transportation environment, including those for freeways, traffic signals, emergency management, traveler information, and data archiving. It has been adopted by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to meet the needs and requirements for ITS communications and to insure that inter-network connectivity is done through an open architecture and industry standard interfaces. NTCIP eliminates barriers to interagency coordination by reducing the need for reliance on specific equipment vendors and customized one-of-a-kind products. It allows a management system to communicate with a mixture of device types of the same communications channel. It also allows for the future expansion of the system to benefit from true competitive bidding, as well as allow other types of ITS elements to be added. One primary purpose of NTCIP is to handle two major ITS communications needs: (1) Centerto-Center (C2C) Communications and (2) Center-to-Field (C2F) Communications and field ITS device interconnect. The communications network requirements for Topeka-Shawnee County are mostly derived from the ITS needs/services and can be grouped into the C2C and C2F categories. A separate effort is being conducted to develop the Kansas Statewide ITS Architecture. Another requirement of the Topeka-Shawnee County ITS Communications Master Plan is to be compliant with and integrate with the Statewide Architecture. Typically, the regional ITS Architectures are rolled up into the statewide plan. In this case, the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture will become a subset to the Kansas Statewide ITS Architecture. Therefore, the proposed high-level communications plan will also become a subset of the larger center-to-center communications plan as well. 3.2 Communications Network Hierarchy The two possible hierarchies for the communication network of the City of Topeka, and the Topeka-Shawnee County Region are presented in Figures 3.1 and 3.2. These figures indicate that the City network will eventually be integrated into the KDOT and the statewide communication system. Iteris, Inc. 13

18 Figure 3.1: Agency Level Communications Concept Figure 3.2: High Level Topeka-Shawnee County Communications Concept Iteris, Inc. 14

19 3.3 Baseline Concept of Operations The concept of operations defines, in more detail, the relationship between participating Topeka-Shawnee County stakeholder agencies, including their roles and responsibilities and the level of information, status, and control sharing among those agencies. It represents the vision of the system based on user needs and how the system will work to satisfy those user needs. The concept of operations is an important component of the system engineering process and has a direct effect on the Center to Center (C2C) communications network requirements. The Topeka-Shawnee County concept of operations consists of two major components: Role and Responsibilities Based on the desire and capabilities of the agencies to transmit/receive, just transmit or just receive traffic information, the centers could be categorized into two types: - Type 1 Center In order to be classified as Type 1, a center has to both transmit and receive information to and from other centers on a continuous basis. In addition, the Type 1 centers are responsible for housing, operating, and maintaining communications equipment for data exchange and sharing with other centers. These centers usually have the most communications infrastructure and are the most ready to provide communications for the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Examples of Type 1 Centers are the City of Topeka Traffic Management Center (TMC), Shawnee County 911 Dispatch Center, KDOT Virtual Operations Center (VOC), City of Topeka (Transportation Operations Maintenance Operations), and Shawnee County Emergency Management Center. - Type 2 Center Type 2 centers will either transmit or receive information, or transmit and receive, but not on a continuous basis, to and from other centers, typically to one or more Type 1 Centers. Type 2 centers are not required to house, operate, and maintain regional communications equipment. An example of this would be the connection between the City of Topeka TMC and the City of Topeka Fire Department. The City of Topeka TMC may only transmit information relative to major events which the City of Topeka Fire Department would request or like to receive such as road closures. Some Type 2 centers may require high bandwidth connections, such as fiber optic cable, if they transmit or receive video. In the future, each Type 2 center may require the need to transmit and receive information on a more frequent basis, or be upgraded to a Type 1 center for continuous information exchange at a future time. Type of Information Two types of information will be involved in the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network: Video and Data. Table 3.1, on the following page, summarizes the relationships of these two components for the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Iteris, Inc. 15

20 Based on the roles of the Topeka-Shawnee County stakeholders, there are two alternatives for the concept of operations. Table 3.1: Potential Roles, Responsibilities, and Type of Data for Stakeholders Role Responsibility Stakeholder Type of Informati on Type 1 Center Transmit and Receive Information House, operate, and maintain regional communications equipment City of Topeka (Traffic Operations TMC) Shawnee County 911 Dispatch Center KDOT Virtual Operations Center (VOC) City of Topeka (Transportation Operations Maintenance Operations) Shawnee County Emergency Management Center Data and Video Type 2 Center Transmit Information City of Topeka Police Department Kansas Turnpike Authority City of Topeka Public Works 311 Call Center Data and Video Type 2 Center No Data Exchange Receive Information Shawnee County Public Works City of Topeka (Traffic Engineering) City of Topeka Fire Department Shawnee County Sheriff s Office Shawnee County Fire District 3 Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority Kansas Highway Patrol Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority Washburn University American Medical Response St. Francis Health Center Stormont-Vail Healthcare Rural/Special Fire Departments Public School Districts These agencies currently do not Transmit or Receive Information None Data and Video Not applicable Iteris, Inc. 16

21 Concept of Operations - Alternative 1 Under this alternative, all centers will be connected to the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network for data and video sharing. In order to communicate with the network, each center has to have similar communications equipment used to access the network. As a result, each center has to house, operate, and maintain its own regional communications equipment. However, the entire communications network can utilize more than one type of media and technologies as a hybrid network. The advantage of this alternative is uniformity because all agencies will be using the same or compatible communications equipment. The disadvantage is that Type 2 centers, as defined, might not have the space and operations and maintenance budget for the regional communications equipment. Figure 3.3 illustrates the concept of operations for Alternative 1. Concept of Operations - Alternative 2 The City of Topeka area-wide network (Topeka IT) supports the various City facilities (Topeka City Hall, Topeka TMC, Shawnee County 911, etc.). Additionally, this network can be modified to support the future KDOT Virtual Operations Center (VOC). The Topeka area-wide network includes a SONET ring and a Gigabit Ethernet ring, the latter of which supports the Topeka TMC. Alternative 2 utilizes the Topeka area-wide network to support the communications between the Type 1 centers, and in some cases, the Type 2 centers, located in the vicinity of the Topeka area-wide network. In this case, Type 1 centers, as well as select Type 2 centers, will be connected to the Topeka area-wide network. Other Type 2 centers will be indirectly connected to the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network through the Topeka TMC or KDOT VOC via the Topeka-Shawnee County communications system that could include fiber optic cable, leased line communications, private web page (virtual private network) and dial up. This approach does not require each center to install the same communications equipment used to access the network. The City traffic signal software system PYRAMIDS, by Econolite, offers two alternatives (dial up or broadband access) for remote access by Type 2 centers not connected to the Topeka TMC via the Topeka IT network. For example, a Type 2 center can continue to use its legacy equipment to transmit data to the Type 1 center. Other centers may receive information from that particular Type 2 center via the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network. However, this does not mean that a Type 2 center cannot implement a direct connection to the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network, but only that they are not required to do so. Like Alternative 1, the entire communications network can utilize more than one type of media and technologies. Figure 3.4 illustrates the concept of operations for Alternative 2. The following three primary factors were considered in the selection of the most appropriate alternative for the Topeka-Shawnee County concept of operations. Cost It is assumed that the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network will be a high speed, high capacity communication backbone for the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Since some Topeka-Shawnee County agencies might not require a high speed and high capacity network, it is not cost effective to have all centers connect to the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network directly. In addition, the Type 2 centers might not have the space to house the regional communication equipment and the operations and maintenance budget for regional communication. Based on the cost fact, Alternative 1 is less desirable than Alternative 2. Iteris, Inc. 17

22 Ease of Deployment Since one common communication technology will be used for the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network for both alternatives, the ease of deployment will depend on the number of agencies that need to be connected to the network. While Alternative 1 requires all centers to be connected to the network, Alternative 2 requires only Type 1 centers to be connected to the network. Therefore, Alternative 2 is relatively easier to deploy than Alternative 1. Existing Infrastructure Alternative 2 is more flexible in terms of existing infrastructure. Alternative 2 makes use of the existing Topeka area-wide network, with minor modification, to support communications between centers. Additionally, the Type 2 centers may be connected to the network via their legacy communications network. Based on the above analysis, it is recommended that Alternative 2 of the Concept of Operations be used for the development of communications network requirements for the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network. This alternative will make the most use of existing infrastructure and the City of Topeka area-wide network. 3.4 Communications Network Requirements The Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Communications Plan will focus on Center-to- Center (C2C) and Center-to-Field (C2F) communications. The following sections present the requirements for these two types of communications Center-to-Center Communications Requirements The following presents the specific C2C communications network requirements that the Topeka- Shawnee County communications network design should support. I. Protocol and Standard Requirements 1. The Topeka-Shawnee County communications network and its associated equipment should comply with NTCIP and other applicable standards, such as the IEEE standards for Ethernet. 2. The Topeka-Shawnee County communications network should allow participating centers to use the same or compatible communications protocols for data sharing and exchange. 3. Communications protocols should be independent of communications media. II. Data Requirements As discussed in the previous chapter, there are two types of centers involved in the Topeka- Shawnee County communications network. The specific data requirements for each type of center are presented below. Note that the list of data requirements is intended to be thorough but not necessarily all encompassing. Iteris, Inc. 18

23 ITS Communication Plan Figure 3.3: Concept of Operations - Alternative 1 Iteris, Inc. 19

24 Figure 3.4: Concept of Operations - Alternative 2 Iteris, Inc. 20

25 ITS Communication Plan City of Topeka TMC Type 1 Center It is envisioned that the Topeka TMC will serve as the Regional TMC for the Topeka- Shawnee County Region. The Topeka TMC will serve as the data hub for transportation management activities in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. The Topeka TMC will serve as the communication hub to the field devices in the Topeka- Shawnee County Region. The Topeka TMC will also serve as the communication hub for the Type 1 and Type 2 centers in the region. The data requirements listed below are intended to support this goal. 1. Transmit and Receive 1.1. Transmit and receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) from City of Topeka field devices Transmit and receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video, CCTV camera control) from Shawnee County field devices Transmit and receive arterial or freeway traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data) from KDOT D1 field devices Transmit and receive CCTV video and camera control from shared City of Topeka / KDOT CCTV cameras Transmit and receive other arterial event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) as needed Transmit and receive traffic event data (e.g. agency name, contact information, number of injuries and fatalities, property damages, number of vehicles involved, etc.). 2. Receive 2.1. Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, and detection data) for KDOT signalized intersections from KDOT D-1 VOC Receive freeway and highway traffic data (e.g. traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) from KDOT D-1 VOC Receive arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) from field devices and other Type 1 and Type 2 centers Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) from other Type 1 centers Receive DMS message data Receive DMS message data as information changes Receive arterial device status information continuously Receive freeway traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc) Receive freeway incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) as needed Receive other freeway event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) Receive toll road traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc) Receive toll road incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) as needed. Iteris, Inc. 21

26 2.13. Receive other toll road event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) Receive roadway weather data as needed Receive transit data (e.g. position, route, stop, schedule, arrival, and departure.) Receive incident data from Shawnee County 911 Dispatch 3. Transmit 3.1. Transmit arterial traffic data, CCTV video and camera control to Shawnee County 911 Dispatch 3.2. Transmit arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) to other centers Transmit arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) to other centers Transmit other event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) to other centers Transmit CCTV control data as needed. KDOT Virtual Operations Center (VOC) Type 1 Center The KDOT VOC is envisioned to be connected to the Topeka TMC to transmit data between the KDOT VOC and the Topeka TMC. The data requirements listed below are intended to support this goal. Additionally, the KDOT VOC will be connected to other KDOT VOCs and TMCs throughout the State. However, the data requirements associated with that element will be addressed as part of the Statewide ITS Architecture project being conducted as part of a separate project. 1. Transmit and Receive 1.1. Transmit and receive messages from freeway DMS Transmit and receive freeway traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) to other centers Transmit and receive freeway incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) to other centers Transmit and receive freeway event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) as needed Transmit and receive traffic data from other KDOT districts Transmit and receive traffic event data (e.g. agency name, contact information, number of injuries and fatalities, property damages, number of vehicles involved, etc.). 2. Receive 2.1. Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) from City, County and KDOT field devices Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) from other Type 1 centers Receive event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) from other Type 1 centers Receive roadway weather data as needed Receive freeway device status information continuously. Iteris, Inc. 22

27 2.6. Receive arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) from field devices and other Type 1 and Type 2 centers Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) from other Type 1 centers Receive DMS message data Receive DMS message data as information changes Receive arterial device status information continuously Receive freeway traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc) Receive other freeway event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) Receive toll road traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc) Receive toll road incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) as needed Receive other toll road event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) Receive roadway weather data as needed Receive transit data (e.g. position, route, stop, schedule, arrival, and departure.) Receive incident data from Shawnee County 911 Dispatch Receive AVL data from Shawnee County 911 Dispatch 3. Transmit 3.1. Transmit CCTV control data. Shawnee County 911 Type 1 Center The Shawnee County 911 Center is envisioned to be connected to the Topeka TMC to transmit data between the 911 Dispatch Center and the Topeka TMC. The data requirements listed below are intended to support this goal. 1. Transmit and Receive 1.1. Transmit and receive other arterial event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) as needed Transmit and receive traffic event data (e.g. agency name, contact information, number of injuries and fatalities, property damages, number of vehicles involved, etc.). 2. Receive 2.1. Receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) Receive CCTV video and camera control Receive freeway and highway traffic data (e.g. traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) Receive arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) from field devices and other Type 1 and Type 2 centers Receive freeway incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) Receive DMS message data. Iteris, Inc. 23

28 2.7. Receive DMS message data as information changes Receive other freeway event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) 2.9. Receive toll road traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc) Receive toll road incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) as needed Receive other toll road event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) Receive roadway weather data as needed Receive transit data (e.g. position, route, stop, schedule, arrival, and departure.). 3. Transmit 3.1. Transmit arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) Transmit freeway incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) Transmit toll road incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) Transmit AVL data 3.5. Transmit CCTV control data as needed. Other Type 1 Centers It is envisioned that additional Type 1 centers will come on-line at a future time in the Topeka-Shawnee County Region. Depending on the sponsoring stakeholder, the information to transmit and / or receive will vary. Some of the types of data requirements are listed below. 1. Transmit and Receive 1.1. Transmit and receive arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) Transmit and receive freeway traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) Transmit and receive toll road traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, CCTV video and camera control) Receive arterial, freeway and toll road incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) Transmit and receive other arterial, freeway and toll road event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) as needed Transmit and receive DMS messages 1.7. Transmit and receive traffic event data (e.g. agency name, contact information, number of injuries and fatalities, property damages, number of vehicles involved, etc.) Transmit and receive DMS messages 2. Receive 2.1. Receive arterial device status information continuously Receive DMS message data as information changes. Iteris, Inc. 24

29 2.3. Receive roadway weather data as needed Receive transit data (e.g. position, route, stop, schedule, arrival, and departure.). 3. Transmit 3.1. Transmit arterial traffic data, CCTV video and camera control 3.2. Transmit CCTV control data as needed. Type 2 Centers Typical data requirements for a Type 2 center are listed below. 1. Receive or transmit arterial traffic data (e.g. timing data, traffic demand data, congestion data, detection data, etc) from Type 1 centers at regular intervals or upon request. 2. Receive or transmit arterial incident data (e.g. data, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) from Type 1 centers. 3. Receive or transmit freeway / toll traffic data (e.g. demand data, congestion data, etc). 4. Receive or transmit freeway / toll incident data (e.g. date, time, location, type, blockage pattern, duration, and status of incidents) as needed. 5. Receive other freeway / toll event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) 6. Receive or transmit arterial DMS message data as information changes. 7. Receive or transmit Shawnee County 911 traffic event data (e.g. agency name, contact information, number of injuries and fatalities, property damages, number of vehicles involved, etc) 8. Receive or transmit other event data (e.g. construction, scheduled maintenance, lane closure, special events, etc.) as needed. 9. Receive or transmit arterial device status information continuously. 10. Receive or transmit roadway weather data as needed. 11. Receive or transmit transit data (e.g. position, route, stop, schedule, arrival, and departure.) 12. Receive or transmit emergency information. 13. Receive or transmit bus locations (transit or school). III. Connectivity Requirements 1. The Topeka-Shawnee County communications network for centers should be continuously available to participating agencies, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 2. The communications interface to the Topeka-Shawnee County network should be able to make use of an open architecture and common industry standards. 3. The network should be able to recover from cable cut or hub failure automatically. Iteris, Inc. 25

30 IV. Bandwidth Requirements 1. The Topeka-Shawnee County communications network should provide sufficient bandwidth for traffic data transmission for all signalized intersections controlled by the Type 1 Centers simultaneously. 2. If video is transmitted in digital format, the data rate for video transmission should be adjusted dynamically based on the available bandwidth. V. Design Requirements 1. In order to avoid duplication of investments in infrastructure, the Topeka- Shawnee County communications network should utilize existing infrastructure wherever available and feasible. 2. Since the timeframe for the Topeka-Shawnee County Regional ITS Architecture is 20 years, the Topeka-Shawnee County communications network should be designed to support communications and system expansion for a minimum of 20- year period. 3. The network should have at least one alternate routing option to ensure uninterrupted operations during hub failure and maintenance downtime. 4. The latency (time between request and system response) of the communications network should be less than one second. 5. The network should support a modular design so that it can be incrementally increased or decreased in size with limited cost and risk as the need to add or remove equipment becomes necessary. 6. Communications equipment should be interchangeable and interoperable. 7. Communications equipment should be IP-addressable for ease of management Center-to-Field Communications Requirements In order to ensure that the current and future ITS projects in Topeka-Shawnee County follow the common communications and infrastructure protocol, it is important to establish some guidelines for C2F communications and interconnection requirements for each center. The following presents some specific C2F communications network requirements that Topeka- Shawnee County agencies should consider for their current and future ITS projects. I. Data Requirements There are several types of ITS devices that have been or will be deployed in the Topeka- Shawnee County Region. The specific data requirements for each type of devices are presented below. 1. Traffic Signals a. Support NTCIP Class B standards. b. Support once per second communications with traffic signal controllers. c. The minimum baud rate for signal communications is assumed to be 9,600 bits per second (bps) and preferably 19.2 kbps. d. Traffic signal data can be multi-dropped. Iteris, Inc. 26

I-29 Corridor ITS Architecture and Systems Engineering Analysis

I-29 Corridor ITS Architecture and Systems Engineering Analysis 430 IACC Building Fargo, ND 58105 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-1945 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org I-29 Corridor ITS Architecture and Systems Engineering Analysis Technical Memorandum December 2001 Prepared

More information

EFFORTS ACCOMPLISHED TO DATE

EFFORTS ACCOMPLISHED TO DATE 12. Intelligent Transportation Systems The Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolitan Area is currently involved in the planning, programming, and implementation of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) programs

More information

Appendix A - Cost Estimate Spreadsheet

Appendix A - Cost Estimate Spreadsheet CCTV Camera, PTZ Per Each $18,500 $1,250 12 $33,500 Closed circuit television (CCTV) camera with pan, tilt, zoom (PTZ) functionality in a dome enclosure. CCTV Camera, Fixed Per Each $14,000 $1,250 12 $29,000

More information

Impact of Connected Automated Vehicles on Traffic Management Centers (TMCs)

Impact of Connected Automated Vehicles on Traffic Management Centers (TMCs) Impact of Connected Automated Vehicles on Traffic Management Centers (TMCs) Automated Vehicles Symposium 2015 Breakout Session Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles on Traffic Management Systems and

More information

Maricopa County Regional Wireless Systems An AZTech White Paper on Wireless Systems Being Used in ITS

Maricopa County Regional Wireless Systems An AZTech White Paper on Wireless Systems Being Used in ITS Prepared by Jordan Lamoreaux Maricopa County Department of Transportation Until recently, if an agency wanted communication to its traffic signals, the best method was installing fiber optic cable. Although

More information

Wireless Traffic Management System

Wireless Traffic Management System Wireless Traffic Management System 1 Introduction The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (LADPW) manages surface street traffic flow in one of the world s largest metropolitan areas. The

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Syracuse Metropolitan Area Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Syracuse Metropolitan Area Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan Syracuse Metropolitan Area Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for New York State Department of Transportation & Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation

More information

Eastern RTMC. www.dot.state.pa.us

Eastern RTMC. www.dot.state.pa.us Eastern RTMC Regional Traffic Management Centers Agenda District 6 0 TIMS Program Overview Freeway and Arterial ITS Deployments Ongoing/Upcoming Projects Future Concepts TIMS Program Timeline 1993 TMC

More information

STATEWIDE ITS ASSETS 1

STATEWIDE ITS ASSETS 1 STATEWIDE ITS ASSETS 1 STATEWIDE IINITIATIVES: Increase safety through better incident management. Improve detection and emergency response. Gather and share real-time traveler information. Manage traffic

More information

Quick-Starting Your. Regional ITS Architecture Update

Quick-Starting Your. Regional ITS Architecture Update Personal Information Access Transit Management Traffic Management Communications Fixed Point-to-Fixed Point Communica Vehicle Roadway Quick-Starting Your Systems Engineering For ITS Regional ITS Architecture

More information

Transportation Operations & Management Center Implementation Plan

Transportation Operations & Management Center Implementation Plan Kansas Statewide Transportation Operations & Management Center Study KDOT Project No. 106 K-9062-01, Task 10 Transportation Operations & Management Center Implementation Plan September 2005 Prepared by:

More information

CHAPTER 8 Integration of Systems

CHAPTER 8 Integration of Systems Integration of Systems CHAPTER 8 Integration of Systems 8-1 Advanced Transportation Management Technologies 8-2 Integration of Systems Individual metropolitan intelligent transportation infrastructure

More information

Metropolitan Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Infrastructure 2010 Transportation Management Center

Metropolitan Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Infrastructure 2010 Transportation Management Center Metropolitan Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Infrastructure 2010 Instructions This questionnaire is designed to obtain data measuring the level of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) implemented

More information

CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS)

CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS) CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) enables people and goods to move more safely and efficiently through a state-of-the-art multi-modal transportation

More information

SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership

SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership Radiah Victor Principal, Operations Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California ITS CA Annual Meeting

More information

CDOT Region 6 Communications Study. Bandwidth Analysis Technical Memorandum. Prepared by:

CDOT Region 6 Communications Study. Bandwidth Analysis Technical Memorandum. Prepared by: CDOT Region 6 Communications Study Analysis Technical Memorandum Prepared by: 1515 Arapahoe St. Suite 500, Tower 1 Denver, CO 80202 303.228.2300 September 22, 2000 CDOT Tech Memo 2 Analysis September 22,

More information

How to Use the MAG ITS Architecture and Website

How to Use the MAG ITS Architecture and Website MAG Regional ITS Architecture How to Use the MAG ITS Architecture and Website Prepared by: June, 2013 Copyright 2013, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1. HOW TO USE THE MAG ITS ARCHITECTURE AND WEBSITE

More information

From: HDR Engineering & Oz Engineering Project: AZTech TM Transit Data Integration Concepts of Operation. Date: July 29, 2009 Job No: 105240

From: HDR Engineering & Oz Engineering Project: AZTech TM Transit Data Integration Concepts of Operation. Date: July 29, 2009 Job No: 105240 To: Faisal Saleem, MCDOT James Book, RPTA Technical Memo From: HDR Engineering & Oz Engineering Project: AZTech TM Transit Data Integration Concepts of Operation CC: Tomas Guerra Saroja Devarakonda, File

More information

Chapter 9A. Network Definition. The Uses of a Network. Network Basics

Chapter 9A. Network Definition. The Uses of a Network. Network Basics Chapter 9A Network Basics 1 Network Definition Set of technologies that connects computers Allows communication and collaboration between users 2 The Uses of a Network Simultaneous access to data Data

More information

Intelligent Transportation Systems Technical Report Summary

Intelligent Transportation Systems Technical Report Summary Intelligent Transportation Systems Technical Report Summary Background What is an Intelligent Transportation System? An Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improves transportation safety and mobility

More information

ITS Investment Strategy 10-Year Program, FY07-16

ITS Investment Strategy 10-Year Program, FY07-16 New Jersey Department of Transportation ITS Investment Strategy 10-Year Program, FY07-16 Statewide Traffic Operations ITS Engineering March, 2007 Intelligent Transportation Systems Investment Strategy

More information

CHICAGO REGION S INTEROPERABLE TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY PROGRAM

CHICAGO REGION S INTEROPERABLE TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY PROGRAM CHICAGO REGION S INTEROPERABLE TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY PROGRAM Daryl Taavola URS Corporation 25 th Annual Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014 Presentation Overview Background Program Update

More information

Network Topologies. Network Topologies

Network Topologies. Network Topologies Network Topologies LANs and WANs - Geographical coverage LANs A single geographical location, such as office building, school, etc Typically High speed and cheaper. WANs Spans more than one geographical

More information

Motorola Wireless Broadband. Video Surveillance Solutions

Motorola Wireless Broadband. Video Surveillance Solutions Motorola Wireless Broadband Video Surveillance Solutions Maximize Video Surveillance Performance and ROI. With today s increased emphasis on public safety and asset protection, the world has begun looking

More information

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN WHATCOM COUNTY A REGIONAL GUIDE TO ITS TECHNOLOGY

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN WHATCOM COUNTY A REGIONAL GUIDE TO ITS TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN WHATCOM COUNTY A REGIONAL GUIDE TO ITS TECHNOLOGY AN INTRODUCTION PREPARED BY THE WHATCOM COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS JULY, 2004 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 E. Champion

More information

Module 2.1. Page 1 of 10. Slide 1

Module 2.1. Page 1 of 10. Slide 1 Slide 1 Module 2: Traffic Incident Management Framework & Resources Lesson 2.1 Regional Transportation Management Centers This course was developed by the Baltimore Regional Operations Coordination Committee

More information

Intelligent Transportation Systems in Illinois

Intelligent Transportation Systems in Illinois Intelligent Transportation Systems in Illinois David Zavattero City of Chicago OEMC Illinois Vice President ITS Midwest ITS Midwest Fall Meeting November 2, 2007 A Short History Traffic Control Traveler

More information

Section 12: Intelligent Transportation Systems

Section 12: Intelligent Transportation Systems Section 12: Transportation Control Center (TCC) Setup The Georgia Department of Transportation s, or GDOT, NaviGAtor system is among the most progressive Intelligent Transportation Systems, or ITS in the

More information

Rhode Island Department of Transportation ITS State Architecture Update

Rhode Island Department of Transportation ITS State Architecture Update Rhode Island Department of Transportation ITS State Architecture Update By: 2014 1 Table of Contents ITS Architecture Description: 1. Introduction - What is an ITS Architecture?... 3 2. Background ITS

More information

Utilization of the 4.9 GHz Band in Transportation and Emergency Response Applications

Utilization of the 4.9 GHz Band in Transportation and Emergency Response Applications Utilization of the 4.9 GHz Band in Transportation and Emergency Response Applications February 25, 2011 Bill Brown Radio and Wireless Manager, VDOT Chair, AASHTO Special Committee on Wireless Communications

More information

Table of Contents. 1.1. Introduction 1. 1.2. System Needs 2. 1.3. Potential Projects 3. 2.1. Background 5. 2.2. Objectives 5

Table of Contents. 1.1. Introduction 1. 1.2. System Needs 2. 1.3. Potential Projects 3. 2.1. Background 5. 2.2. Objectives 5 Table of Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. System Needs 2 1.3. Potential Projects 3 2. Introduction 2.1. Background 5 2.2. Objectives 5 2.3. Plan Development Process 6 2.4. TCC

More information

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE DELIVERABLE NO. 2 DRAFT DATA REPORT FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE DELIVERABLE NO. 2 DRAFT DATA REPORT FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE DELIVERABLE NO. 2 DRAFT DATA REPORT FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201

More information

Central Regional Traffic Management Center

Central Regional Traffic Management Center Central Regional Traffic Management Center The Shift to Operations Rich Deen, RTMC Manager, District 8-0 October 5, 2009 ASHE Meeting Where we came from? Circa 1986 Someone in PENNDOT- We can t build our

More information

Telecommunications, Networks, and Wireless Computing

Telecommunications, Networks, and Wireless Computing Objectives Telecommunications, Networks, and Wireless Computing 1. What are the features of a contemporary corporate telecommunications system? On what major technology developments are they based? 2.

More information

Supporting Municipal Business Models with Cisco Outdoor Wireless Solutions

Supporting Municipal Business Models with Cisco Outdoor Wireless Solutions Supporting Municipal Business Models with Cisco Outdoor Wireless Solutions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Outdoor wireless networks are playing a vital role in helping municipalities deliver critical services to citizens.

More information

w. www.itsradar.co.uk e. itsradar@fabermaunsell.com t.0121 2626066 f.0121 2621999-1 -

w. www.itsradar.co.uk e. itsradar@fabermaunsell.com t.0121 2626066 f.0121 2621999-1 - #!" # $%#"$!&###'# (")*+,-.)*+,/#0 (" (# 1"*% :#, 1"#2 3( 1# 1"#41(,(# 5" (6(,( 1#, 3(# 2$#7/#( 8 96"5" &9: (.)# 5(( 8 ;

More information

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Concept of Operations for Arterial Traffic Management

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Concept of Operations for Arterial Traffic Management Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Concept of Operations for Arterial Traffic Management Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Prepared by: Athey Creek Consultants and Alliant

More information

Linking Planning and Operations Initiative A Data Driven Approach. Chris Francis Transportation Statistics

Linking Planning and Operations Initiative A Data Driven Approach. Chris Francis Transportation Statistics Linking Planning and Operations Initiative A Data Driven Approach Chris Francis Transportation Statistics Data Symposium - Traffic Data, Orlando, FL, Oct 23-24, 2014 Outline 2 Emerging Transportation Scene

More information

MANAGING THE KUALA LUMPUR ROAD NETWORK WITH THE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT INFORMATION SYSTEM

MANAGING THE KUALA LUMPUR ROAD NETWORK WITH THE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT INFORMATION SYSTEM MANAGING THE KUALA LUMPUR ROAD NETWORK WITH THE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT INFORMATION SYSTEM Ir Mahfix bin Omar, Director, Road Transport Department, City Hall, Kuala Lumpur ABSTRACT The Integrated Transport

More information

ADSL or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. Backbone. Bandwidth. Bit. Bits Per Second or bps

ADSL or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. Backbone. Bandwidth. Bit. Bits Per Second or bps ADSL or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line Backbone Bandwidth Bit Commonly called DSL. Technology and equipment that allow high-speed communication across standard copper telephone wires. This can include

More information

Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs

Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs Department of Technology Services Department of Transportation Montgomery County Government, MD 3/7/2012 2011 by Montgomery County

More information

www.quicknetworksolutions.net RC: 960240

www.quicknetworksolutions.net RC: 960240 QSL is a growing business that s offering IT Solutions and services to SME and Established Organizations with a high level of understanding and fully qualified, friendly and knowledgeable consultants.

More information

How To Create A Converged Network For Public Safety

How To Create A Converged Network For Public Safety IP/MPLS Whitepaper Benefits of Converged Networking in a Public Safety Environment Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Current Public Safety Network Landscape... 2 The Migration to All-IP... 3 MPLS Functionality

More information

I-95 Corridor Coalition. Best Practices for Border Bridge Incident Management Executive Summary

I-95 Corridor Coalition. Best Practices for Border Bridge Incident Management Executive Summary I-95 Corridor Coalition Best Practices for Border Bridge Incident Management January 2007 Best Practices for Border Bridge Incident Management Prepared for: I-95 Corridor Coalition Sponsored by: I-95 Corridor

More information

Section 2: Overview of Wireless Broadband Networks

Section 2: Overview of Wireless Broadband Networks Section 2: Overview of Wireless Broadband Networks 2.1 Introduction to Broadband Network Elements Over the past decade, technological innovation and a motivation to deploy broadband in new, efficient ways

More information

Some questions. What s next? What is the TMA? Why a TMC? What will the Chicago TMC do? What s done so far? Existing systems Related projects

Some questions. What s next? What is the TMA? Why a TMC? What will the Chicago TMC do? What s done so far? Existing systems Related projects Some questions What is the TMA? Why a TMC? What will the Chicago TMC do? What s done so far? Existing systems Related projects What s next? An Overview Signal systems Traveler information Transit and traffic

More information

Local Area Network By Bhupendra Ratha, Lecturer School of Library and Information Science Devi Ahilya University, Indore Email: bhu261@gmail.com Local Area Network LANs connect computers and peripheral

More information

ITE JOURNAL. Transportation Top Picks INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2012

ITE JOURNAL. Transportation Top Picks INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2012 ITE JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2012 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS Transportation Top Picks Upgrading Citywide Traffic Signal Systems Over Broadband Wireless Mesh Networks Wireless mesh networks have become

More information

8 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 8.1 Introduction

8 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 8.1 Introduction 8 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8.1 Introduction An implementation plan for the Illinois Statewide ITS Strategic Plan is the next step of the project planning process. This plan provides a strategy for implementing

More information

Alcatel-Lucent In-building Wireless Continuity Solution for Healthcare

Alcatel-Lucent In-building Wireless Continuity Solution for Healthcare S T R A T E G I C W H I T E P A P E R Alcatel-Lucent In-building Wireless Continuity Solution for Healthcare Healthcare facilities are under pressure to provide high-quality wireless coverage using a range

More information

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) Blueprint Version 2.0 Executive Summary

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) Blueprint Version 2.0 Executive Summary Blueprint Version 2.0 Executive Summary Strategic Background The Southeastern Wisconsin region, which encompasses the following eight counties: Fond du Lac, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Walworth,

More information

Cisco Mobile Network Solutions for Commercial Transit Agencies

Cisco Mobile Network Solutions for Commercial Transit Agencies Cisco Mobile Network Solutions for Commercial Transit Agencies Overview Commercial transit agencies provide a vital service to our communities. Their goal is to provide safe, affordable, and convenient

More information

R2. The word protocol is often used to describe diplomatic relations. How does Wikipedia describe diplomatic protocol?

R2. The word protocol is often used to describe diplomatic relations. How does Wikipedia describe diplomatic protocol? Chapter 1 Review Questions R1. What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end systems. Is a Web server an end system? 1. There is no difference. Throughout

More information

Houston TranStar. Greater Houston Transportation and Emergency Management Center. www.houstontranstar.org

Houston TranStar. Greater Houston Transportation and Emergency Management Center. www.houstontranstar.org Houston TranStar Greater Houston Transportation and Emergency Management Center www.houstontranstar.org Houston TranStar Greater Houston Transportation and Emergency Management Center Four Partners Working

More information

9. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN. 9.1 Introduction. 9.2 Purpose of Operations and Maintenance Planning. 9.3 Project Operations Planning

9. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN. 9.1 Introduction. 9.2 Purpose of Operations and Maintenance Planning. 9.3 Project Operations Planning 9. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 9.1 Introduction Operations and maintenance planning is a critical component to any transportation system, especially in the case of ITS where new and complex technologies

More information

Communications Master Plan and Implementation Plan Deliverable No. 29

Communications Master Plan and Implementation Plan Deliverable No. 29 Bay Area Freeway Concept of Operations Communications Master Plan and Implementation Plan Deliverable No. 29 Prepared by: June 7, 2002 091598000 Copyright 2002, Metropolitan Transportation Commission TABLE

More information

QUALITY TRAFFIC INFORMATION

QUALITY TRAFFIC INFORMATION QUALITY TRAFFIC INFORMATION Manuel Fontan, P.E. Engineer III Broward County Public Works Department Highway Construction and Engineering Division 1 North University Dr. Plantation, Florida 33324 +1-954-577-4654,

More information

the amount of data will grow. It is projected by the industry that utilities will go from moving and managing 7 terabytes of data to 800 terabytes.

the amount of data will grow. It is projected by the industry that utilities will go from moving and managing 7 terabytes of data to 800 terabytes. Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities To Inform Federal Smart

More information

Traffic Management Centers

Traffic Management Centers Traffic Management Centers IN A CONNECTED VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT Task 2. Investigation of Expected Changes in TMCs Final Report Prepared for: CTS Pooled Fund Study, University of Virginia Prepared By: November

More information

Intelligent Transportation System - I

Intelligent Transportation System - I Chapter 48 Intelligent Transportation System - I 48.1 Overview Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is the application of computer, electronics, and communication technologies and management strategies

More information

Interoperability: Can You Hear Me Now?

Interoperability: Can You Hear Me Now? Interoperability: Can You Hear Me Now? An Innovative Approach to Providing Public Safety and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Communications in Rural Kansas 2007: What a Year Tornados Floods Snow

More information

Kansas City Scout Traffic Management Center Monthly Report

Kansas City Scout Traffic Management Center Monthly Report Kansas City Scout Traffic Management Center Monthly Report March 2010 Prepared For: KC Scout Board of Directors Prepared By: KC Scout Operations Team March 2010 Table of Contents List of Figures... iii

More information

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1 provides background information on electronic safety and secuirty (ESS), including the definition and areas of knowledge required for an ESS designer. Information contained

More information

Doppler Traffic Flow Sensor For Traveler Information Systems. October, 2007 1

Doppler Traffic Flow Sensor For Traveler Information Systems. October, 2007 1 Doppler Traffic Flow Sensor For Traveler Information Systems October, 2007 1 Traffic congestion costs $70B a year Road construction can t keep up with demand Congestion spreading to smaller cities Many

More information

Computer Networks. Definition of LAN. Connection of Network. Key Points of LAN. Lecture 06 Connecting Networks

Computer Networks. Definition of LAN. Connection of Network. Key Points of LAN. Lecture 06 Connecting Networks Computer Networks Lecture 06 Connecting Networks Kuang-hua Chen Department of Library and Information Science National Taiwan University Local Area Networks (LAN) 5 kilometer IEEE 802.3 Ethernet IEEE 802.4

More information

About Reltronics Technologies, Inc. Secure & Track Anything, Anywhere, Anytime

About Reltronics Technologies, Inc. Secure & Track Anything, Anywhere, Anytime Reltronics Technologies, Inc. specializes in Security and Tracking Solutions. The company focuses in manufacturing, deploying, and monitoring Security & Tracking systems that include radio frequency identification,

More information

Task 7 Oahu ITS Integration Strategy

Task 7 Oahu ITS Integration Strategy Deliverable for: Oahu Regional ITS Architecture Project Task 7 Oahu ITS Integration Strategy Deliverable VII-1 Final Submitted to: Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff

More information

C20.0001 Information Systems for Managers Fall 1999

C20.0001 Information Systems for Managers Fall 1999 New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business C20.0001 Information Systems for Managers Fall 1999 Networking Fundamentals A network comprises two or more computers that have been connected in

More information

Traffic Management Centers for the Extreme Do-It-Yourselfer

Traffic Management Centers for the Extreme Do-It-Yourselfer Traffic Management Centers for the Extreme Do-It-Yourselfer Thomas Mahood Abstract: As congestion increases in urban/suburban areas, so does the need for relief. Technological advances have made Traffic

More information

Chapter 9 Communications and Networks

Chapter 9 Communications and Networks Chapter 9 Communications and Networks Chapter 9 Objectives Discuss the components required for successful communications Identify various sending and receiving devices Explain the purpose of communications

More information

Glossary of Telco Terms

Glossary of Telco Terms Glossary of Telco Terms Access Generally refers to the connection between your business and the public phone network, or between your business and another dedicated location. A large portion of your business

More information

4. Technology Assessment

4. Technology Assessment 4. Technology Assessment KAT Transit Development Plan A technology study for KAT was prepared in 2005. That work provides the basis for this chapter as much of the information is germane and tied to the

More information

Advanced Transportation Management Systems

Advanced Transportation Management Systems Advanced Transportation Management Systems Summary Many Department of Transportation agencies are looking for cost-saving ways to improve the efficiencies of roadways without making actual surface improvements

More information

7.0 Transportation Management

7.0 Transportation Management 7.0 Transportation Management I. Introduction The Kansas City region has invested considerable effort and resources in the design and implementation of its regional multimodal transportation system. As

More information

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...2 2. INVENTORY OF EXISTING ITS IN THE TULSA REGION...3

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...2 2. INVENTORY OF EXISTING ITS IN THE TULSA REGION...3 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...2 2. INVENTORY OF EXISTING ITS IN THE TULSA REGION...3 3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE TULSA REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE...4 3.1 CONFORMITY WITH THE ITS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE...4

More information

Concept Of Operations: Fargo-Moorhead Traffic Operations Center

Concept Of Operations: Fargo-Moorhead Traffic Operations Center Concept Of Operations: Fargo-Moorhead Traffic Operations Center December 2014 FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Fargo-Moorhead Council of Governments (Metro COG) Prepared by: Advanced Traffic Analysis Center

More information

APPENDIX 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3

APPENDIX 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3 APPENDI 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3 TO THE COMPREHENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT APPENDI 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3 TO THE COMPREHENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT APPENDI 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3 TO THE COMPREHENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE

More information

District Wide Traffic Incident Management Strategic Plan

District Wide Traffic Incident Management Strategic Plan Page 1 Executive Summary The District Wide Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Strategic Plan was prepared to provide a roadmap for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 4 to advance their

More information

Tab 26 Attachment A UEN Commercial VoIP Policy

Tab 26 Attachment A UEN Commercial VoIP Policy Tab 26 Attachment A UEN Commercial VoIP Policy Policy The purpose of this Policy is to clarify UEN s position regarding VoIP Services transported over the UEN network. The policy outlines the criteria

More information

This course has been retired. View the schedule of current <a href=http://www.ptr.co.uk/networkingcourses.htm>networking

This course has been retired. View the schedule of current <a href=http://www.ptr.co.uk/networkingcourses.htm>networking Introduction to Data Communications & Networking Course Description: This course has been retired. View the schedule of current networking Courses

More information

Product Overview. Steve Erickson

Product Overview. Steve Erickson Product Overview Steve Erickson Memorylink products GPS-100C Flanger About Flanger TDM over IP, wired or wireless applications Wireless T1/E1 using Ethernet radios 1-4 T1 s or E1 s per unit Additional

More information

Ethernet Applications in Traffic Control Demand for Bandwidth Makes Ethernet the Preferred Protocol

Ethernet Applications in Traffic Control Demand for Bandwidth Makes Ethernet the Preferred Protocol GarrettCom, Inc. Phone: (510) 438-9071 213 Hammond Ave. Fax: (510) 438-9072 Fremont, CA 94539 Email: mktg@garrettcom.com USA Web site: www.garrettcom.com Ethernet Applications in Traffic Control Demand

More information

CHAPTER 8 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 8 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS 8.0 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 8 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS This Chapter of the Tennessee Department of Transportation Traffic Design Manual will be used to address policies, guidelines, standard procedures,

More information

Introduction. Industry Changes

Introduction. Industry Changes Introduction The Electronic Safety and Security Design Reference Manual (ESSDRM) is designed to educate and inform professionals in the safety and security arena. The ESSDRM discusses trends and expertise

More information

UEN GUIDELINES: NETWORK SERVICES VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL

UEN GUIDELINES: NETWORK SERVICES VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL UEN GUIDELINES: NETWORK SERVICES VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL Purpose This document outlines UEN s guidelines for implementing a VoIP communication link through its network. The implementation process

More information

Component 4: Introduction to Information and Computer Science

Component 4: Introduction to Information and Computer Science Component 4: Introduction to Information and Computer Science Unit 7: Networks & Networking Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health

More information

Advanced Traffic Management Systems

Advanced Traffic Management Systems T2+2 Market Overview Advanced Traffic Management Systems March 4, 2009 Foresight Science & Technology, 430 Angell St., Providence, RI 02906 Voice: 401-273-4844; Fax: 401-273-4744; Web: http://www.foresightst.com/

More information

Olympic Region Traffic Management Center. Olympic Radio

Olympic Region Traffic Management Center. Olympic Radio Olympic Region Traffic Management Center Olympic Radio Six Regions - One DOT We work in close partnership with other TMCs 6 WSDOT Regions 6 Regional Traffic Management Centers Tacoma Seattle Vancouver

More information

Portable Traffic Management System Smart Work Zone Application

Portable Traffic Management System Smart Work Zone Application Portable Traffic Management System Smart Work Zone Application Operational Test Evaluation Report IN N ESOT A PA R T M E N T PO DE R TAT I O N M OF TRANS May 1997 PORTABLE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SMART

More information

The Dollars and Sense of Government-Led Wireless Internet

The Dollars and Sense of Government-Led Wireless Internet The Dollars and Sense of Government-Led Wireless Internet A Guide for Government Employees and Community Activists Introduction: Wireless Broadband for All in St. Cloud, Florida Local governments provide

More information

A NIMS Smart Practice

A NIMS Smart Practice NIMS Smart Practice: 02-06 NIMS Integration Center, May 2006 www.fema.gov/emergency/nims 202-646-3850 A NIMS Smart Practice IN ALLEGANY COUNTY, MARYLAND: A MUNICIPAL WIRELESS NETWORK PROVIDING ENHANCED

More information

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects APPENDIX A Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects Transportation System Transportation System Management Projects Management Strategies Traffic Signalization and Control New Signal Installation

More information

RTMS Solutions. Detection solutions to fit your city s needs.

RTMS Solutions. Detection solutions to fit your city s needs. RTMS Solutions Detection solutions to fit your city s needs. Keeping your daily commute free of congestion - and maintenance. Behind the scenes in cities all over the world, RTMS radar detection solutions

More information

White paper. Reliable and Scalable TETRA networks

White paper. Reliable and Scalable TETRA networks Abstract The evolution of TETRA networks towards an all- IP architecture is now a reality and has been accepted by even the most demanding users of TETRA technology. Although circuit switch based TETRA

More information

LTE, WLAN, BLUETOOTHB

LTE, WLAN, BLUETOOTHB LTE, WLAN, BLUETOOTHB AND Aditya K. Jagannatham FUTURE Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Commonwealth of Learning Vancouver 4G LTE LTE (Long Term Evolution) is the 4G wireless cellular standard developed

More information

Joint Wireless Review Committee Business Case

Joint Wireless Review Committee Business Case Joint Wireless Review Committee Business Case 1 Introduction 2 Opportunities 3 Financial, Resource Plan and ROI 4 Risks Conclusion and rewards JWRC Mandate Approve wireless projects Integrated outdoor

More information

(This page intentionally left blank.)

(This page intentionally left blank.) (This page intentionally left blank.) BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT Information Technology (IT) Systems Plan July 26, 2013 TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS PLAN INTRODUCTION In order to develop an appropriate

More information

Public Network. 1. Relatively long physical distance 2. Requiring a service provider (carrier) Branch Office. Home. Private Network.

Public Network. 1. Relatively long physical distance 2. Requiring a service provider (carrier) Branch Office. Home. Private Network. Introduction to LAN TDC 363 Week 4 Connecting LAN to WAN Book: Chapter 7 1 Outline Wide Area Network (WAN): definition WAN Topologies Choices of WAN technologies Dial-up ISDN T1 Frame Relay DSL Remote

More information

CELL PHONE TRACKING. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential

CELL PHONE TRACKING. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential CELL PHONE TRACKING Index Purpose Description Relevance for Large Scale Events Options Technologies Impacts Integration potential Implementation Best Cases and Examples 1 of 10 Purpose Cell phone tracking

More information

Homeland Security Solutions

Homeland Security Solutions Homeland Security Solutions Homeland Security - RAD Solutions Many organizations in the public and private sectors today require Homeland Security (HLS) systems: Defense agencies and defense industries,

More information