RESOLVING SERVER PROBLEMS WITH DELL PROSUPPORT PLUS AND SUPPORTASSIST AUTOMATED MONITORING AND RESPONSE



Similar documents
How To Compare Two Servers For A Test On A Poweredge R710 And Poweredge G5P (Poweredge) (Power Edge) (Dell) Poweredge Poweredge And Powerpowerpoweredge (Powerpower) G5I (

IMPROVE YOUR SUPPORT EXPERIENCE WITH DELL PREMIUM SUPPORT WITH SUPPORTASSIST TECHNOLOGY

VIRTUALIZATION-MANAGEMENT COMPARISON: DELL FOGLIGHT FOR VIRTUALIZATION VS. SOLARWINDS VIRTUALIZATION MANAGER

TOTAL COST COMPARISON SUMMARY: VMWARE VSPHERE VS. MICROSOFT HYPER-V

Figure 1A: Dell server and accessories Figure 1B: HP server and accessories Figure 1C: IBM server and accessories

Out-of-box comparison between Dell and HP blade servers

SERVER POWER CALCULATOR ANALYSIS: CISCO UCS POWER CALCULATOR AND HP POWER ADVISOR

How To Perform A File Server On A Poweredge R730Xd With Windows Storage Spaces

TEST REPORT Dell PERC H700 average percentage win in IOPS over FEBRUARY 2006 Dell PERC 6/i across RAID 5 and RAID 10. Internal HDD tests

A QUICK AND EASY GUIDE TO SETTING UP THE DELL POWEREDGE C8000

LOAD BALANCING IN THE MODERN DATA CENTER WITH BARRACUDA LOAD BALANCER FDC T740

I/O PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF VMWARE VCLOUD HYBRID SERVICE AND AMAZON WEB SERVICES

MANAGING CLIENTS WITH DELL CLIENT INTEGRATION PACK 3.0 AND MICROSOFT SYSTEM CENTER CONFIGURATION MANAGER 2012

Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT SHAREPOINT PERFORMANCE: TREND MICRO PORTALPROTECT VS. MICROSOFT FOREFRONT JULY 2011

CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT: DELL LIFECYCLE CONTROLLER INTEGRATION FOR SCCM VS. HP PROLIANT INTEGRATION KIT FOR SCCM

CPU PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TWO CLOUD SOLUTIONS: VMWARE VCLOUD HYBRID SERVICE AND MICROSOFT AZURE

BETTER PUBLIC CLOUD PERFORMANCE WITH SOFTLAYER

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP: DELL LATITUDE E6510 VS. APPLE 15-INCH MACBOOK PRO

I/O PERFORMANCE OF THE LENOVO STORAGE N4610

A Principled Technologies white paper commissioned by Dell Inc.

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R720 VS. HP PROLIANT DL380 G7

FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT SYSTEM MANAGEMENT WITH LENOVO XCLARITY ADMINISTRATOR

WEB SERVER PERFORMANCE: DELL SERVERS

VERITAS Software - Storage Foundation for Windows Dynamic Multi-Pathing Performance Testing

COMPLEXITY COMPARISON: CISCO UCS VS. HP VIRTUAL CONNECT

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

ALIENWARE X51 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: SAMSUNG SSD VS. TRADITIONAL HARD DRIVE

CLOUD NETWORKING WITH CA 3TERA APPLOGIC

Comtrol Corporation: Latency Performance Testing of Network Device Servers

VIRTUALIZED STORAGE IN CA APPLOGIC

A Principled Technologies deployment guide commissioned by Dell Inc.

TEST REPORT OCTOBER 2009 SMB Workload performance testing: PowerEdge T110 vs. an older small business desktop running typical small

Summary. Key results at a glance:

COMPLEXITY AND COST COMPARISON: CISCO UCS VS. IBM FLEX SYSTEM (REVISED)

CONSOLIDATING SERVERS WITH THE DELL POWEREDGE R720 RUNNING MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 AND MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2012

VERITAS NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 3)

SYMANTEC NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 1)

SYMANTEC NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 2)

Digi International: Digi One IA RealPort Latency Performance Testing

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT EXCHANGE PERFORMANCE: TREND MICRO SCANMAIL SUITE VS. MICROSOFT FOREFRONT SEPTEMBER 2011

DELL VS. SUN SERVERS: R910 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SPECint_rate_base2006

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE WITH IN-MEMORY SQL SERVER 2014 DATABASE FEATURES ON THE DELL POWEREDGE R930

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT VIDEO-RENDERING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: DELL PRECISION MOBILE WORKSTATIONS VS. APPLE MACBOOK PROS MARCH 2012

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 with Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 vs. Linux Competitive Web Server Performance Comparison

CA INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 2.0 VS. CA INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 1.0: SPEED AND EASE OF MANAGEMENT

MIGRATING MIDDLEWARE APPLICATIONS USING RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION

DATABASE PERFORMANCE: DELL SERVERS

CA INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 2.0 VS. SOLARWINDS ORION: SPEED AND EASE OF MANAGEMENT

BROWSING WEBSITES WITH THE ASUS ZENPAD S 8.0

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 vs. Linux Competitive File Server Performance Comparison

CONSOLIDATING SQL SERVER 2000 ONTO DELL POWEREDGE R900 AND POWEREDGE R905 USING MICROSOFT S HYPER-V

Optimizing SQL Server Storage Performance with the PowerEdge R720

INTEL XEON PROCESSOR E5-2690: ENTERPRISE WORKLOAD PERFORMANCE WHILE RUNNING STORAGE EFFICIENCY TASKS

Best Practices for Installing and Configuring the Hyper-V Role on the LSI CTS2600 Storage System for Windows 2008

DEDUPLICATION WITHOUT PERFORMANCE HITS: INTEL XEON PROCESSOR E5-2697V2-POWERED DELL POWEREDGE R720XD

COST AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON FOR OPENSTACK COMPUTE AND STORAGE INFRASTRUCTURE

Evaluation of Dell PowerEdge VRTX Shared PERC8 in Failover Scenario

DELL POWEREDGE M420: A MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2012 ALWAYSON FAILOVER CLUSTER REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

BACK UP DEDUPLICATED DATA IN LESS TIME WITH THE DELL DR6000 DISK BACKUP APPLIANCE

NetIQ Privileged User Manager

DATABASE PERFORMANCE WITH ENTERPRISE-CLASS KINGSTON SSDS

JUNE 2009 File server performance comparison of three Dell PowerVault NX3000 configurations using Microsoft FSCT

New!! - Higher performance for Windows and UNIX environments

StarWind iscsi SAN: Configuring Global Deduplication May 2012

Comparing Multi-Core Processors for Server Virtualization

RESOURCE BALANCING COMPARISON: VMWARE VSPHERE 6 VS. RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION 3.5

SERVER PERFORMANCE WITH FULL DISK ENCRYPTION: THE DELL-AMD ADVANTAGE

CONSOLIDATING DATABASE SERVERS WITH THE LENOVO THINKSERVER RD630

7 Real Benefits of a Virtual Infrastructure

Adapt Support Managed Service Programs

Taking Virtualization

High Performance Tier Implementation Guideline

CONSOLIDATING SQL SERVER 2005 ONTO DELL POWEREDGE R900 AND POWEREDGE R905 USING MICROSOFT S HYPER-V

White Paper. Better Performance, Lower Costs. The Advantages of IBM PowerLinux 7R2 with PowerVM versus HP DL380p G8 with vsphere 5.

Trend Micro Incorporated reserves the right to make changes to this document and to the products described herein without notice.

Dell Statistica. Statistica Document Management System (SDMS) Requirements

Hardware/Software Specifications for Self-Hosted Systems (Multi-Server)

Vendor and Hardware Platform: Fujitsu BX924 S2 Virtualization Platform: VMware ESX 4.0 Update 2 (build )

Achieving a High Performance OLTP Database using SQL Server and Dell PowerEdge R720 with Internal PCIe SSD Storage

Visual UpTime Select Server Specifications

Quest vworkspace Virtual Desktop Extensions for Linux

Small Industries Development Bank of India Request for Proposal (RfP) For Purchase of Intel Servers for Various Locations

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

ACANO SOLUTION VIRTUALIZED DEPLOYMENTS. White Paper. Simon Evans, Acano Chief Scientist

SERVERS: MAKING THE 32-BIT TO 64-BIT TRANSITION

Microsoft Exchange 2010 on Dell Systems. Simple Distributed Configurations

Lenovo Partner Pack for System Center Operations Manager

Molecular Devices High Content Data Management Solution Database Schema

Transcription:

RESOLVING SERVER PROBLEMS WITH DELL PROSUPPORT PLUS AND SUPPORTASSIST AUTOMATED MONITORING AND RESPONSE Sometimes, a power fluctuation can damage a memory module, or a hard drive can fail, threatening your data s safety. When these kinds of things happen, how soon can your IT staff solve the problem and return your systems to optimal performance? For an issue with our Dell server, we found that Dell ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist was proactive and handled our issue quickly to maximize server uptime. In the Principled Technologies datacenter, we simulated a hard drive failure on a Dell server in three scenarios. In the first scenario, without SupportAssist and under Basic Limited Hardware Warranty coverage, resolving the hard drive problem required an hour and 21 minutes from one of our administrators. It took a mix of phone calls and email to diagnose the problem and reach resolution. In the second scenario, under ProSupport Plus coverage but without SupportAssist enabled in the environment, our response to the situation was delayed by having to identify the failure ourselves. We then had to call the technical support team to fully diagnose the problem and acquire a replacement, which took 14 minutes. In our third scenario, with SupportAssist enabled and under ProSupport Plus coverage, SupportAssist quickly identified the problem and created a case for it in just one minute. Then, the Dell technical support team reached out via email to let us know about the failure. On our end, our communication with Dell required only eight minutes of data entry from one of our IT administrators. ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist reduced the amount of IT administrator involvement by up to 90.1 percent. PROACTIVE SUPPORT WITH DELL PROSUPPORT PLUS FOR SERVERS Dell offers ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist technology for servers as a premium support service. The service allows IT staff to get a jump on hardware issue resolution by having the Dell technical support team contact them the first time an issue occurs. With SupportAssist automated monitoring and response, Dell alerts an IT staff member when a server component fails. A friendly, knowledgeable tech support person requests contact information and asks how the IT staff member would like to handle the replacement. That can save time and hassle over monitoring internally, taking time to notice a failed component, and then spending time troubleshooting the problem. We compared our experience seeking help from Dell with and without SupportAssist technology enabled under ProSupport Plus coverage as well as a scenario with only Basic Limited Hardware Warranty coverage and without SupportAssist. Each scenario began with the simulated hard drive failure and ended when Dell confirmed that we would receive a replacement hard drive. For details on our test system, see Appendix A. For details on our test procedure, see Appendix B. SEPTEMBER 2015 A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT Commissioned by Dell Inc.

THE PROBLEM: HARD DRIVE FAILURE Depending on the size of your business, a hard drive failure can be anything from an inconvenience to a major setback. In any instance, replacing the hard drive and minimizing downtime requires the problem to be identified and resolved quickly. For Dell servers, there are three different paths to resolution after such an incident. Dell Basic Limited Hardware Warranty without SupportAssist Without ProSupport Plus or SupportAssist technology under a Basic Limited Hardware Warranty coverage for the server, your IT admin can t start fixing a problem until the admin has noticed and identified the problem. Once aware, the admin may have to reschedule meetings and delay other tasks to make time for the call to Dell. The admin wouldn t know, though, how long the call might take or if there would be a need for additional communication. Dell ProSupport Plus without SupportAssist enabled Choosing to operate without SupportAssist automated monitoring and response enabled means your IT admin won t be immediately notified of a server problem such as a hard drive failure. However, after identifying the problem, the admin will have the support of Dell technical support staff and can receive necessary replacement parts quickly. Dell ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist With SupportAssist, your IT admin would receive a call or email shortly after the hard drive failure occurred; the admin wouldn t have to notice the problem on their own. SupportAssist technology recognizes when a component fails and immediately opens a case with the Dell technical support team, automatically providing them with the right information. It s like automatically sending out a signal for a superhero to come save the day. Soon after a device fails, your IT admin would rest easy, knowing a replacement is on its way from Dell. Technical support staff would even know the correct model of the hardware to ship without contacting your admin, thanks to SupportAssist s ability to gather system hardware logs. WHAT WE FOUND In the scenario without ProSupport Plus or SupportAssist, one of our admins spent 56 minutes on the phone and 25 minutes on email with Dell to resolve the hard drive failure. In our scenario without SupportAssist enabled, we found that ProSupport Plus did a good job handling the hard drive failure. Although Dell recommends the use of SupportAssist for automated proactive monitoring and response, in this scenario we opted not to deploy the tool. Instead, when our test team noticed the drive failure, one A Principled Technologies test report 2

of our admins contacted the technical support team and was on the phone for only 14 minutes before resolution when Dell issued a replacement drive due to arrive for the requested replacement window. In our final scenario featuring Dell SupportAssist automated monitoring and response, the Dell server promptly notified Dell technical support after the simulated hard drive failure occurred. Dell then emailed us to let us know that the problem was being resolved. With SupportAssist, getting the replacement hard drive did not require us to call Dell. Technical support staff reached out to us when necessary and required only eight minutes of involvement via email from one of our IT admins. ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist reduced the amount of IT administrator involvement by 90.1 percent compared to Basic Warranty Coverage without SupportAssist. ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist reduced the amount of IT administrator involvement by 42.9 percent compared to ProSupport Plus without SupportAssist enabled. Figure 1 breaks down the time to resolve the three scenarios by getting a replacement hard drive after becoming aware of the drive failure. Basic Limited Hardware Warranty without SupportAssist ProSupport Plus without SupportAssist ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist Phone: Collecting basic information 0:22 0:08 Phone: Troubleshooting 0:31 0:02 Phone: Collecting ordering information 0:03 0:04 Email 0:25 0:08 Total 1:21 0:14 0:08 Figure 1: Times in hours:minutes to resolve each scenario. CONCLUSION Keeping your business moving means having a swift and accurate response when a problem arises. We found that Dell ProSupport Plus with SupportAssist automated monitoring and response was proactive and required little effort from us when dealing with a simulated hard drive failure. Dell technical support contacted us to resolve our issues, with knowledge of what happened from the system itself. By enabling SupportAssist automated monitoring and response, Dell also provided a good overall experience by accurately identifying and resolving the issue and shipping necessary replacement parts, reducing active IT administrator time by up to 90.1 percent. A Principled Technologies test report 3

APPENDIX A SYSTEM CONFIGURATION INFORMATION Figure 2 details the configurations of our test systems. Dell PowerEdge R720 (four) Power supplies Total number 2 Dell D750E-S1 Wattage of each (W) 750 Cooling fans Total number 6 San Ace 60 9GA0612P1K641 Dimensions (h w) of each 2.5 2.5 Volts 12 Amps 0.95 General Number of processor packages 2 Number of cores per processor 8 Number of hardware threads per core 2 System power management policy Balanced CPU Vendor Intel Name Xeon Model number E5-2640 v2 Stepping M1 Socket type LGA2011 Core frequency (GHz) 2.00 Bus frequency 7.2 GT/s L1 cache 32 KB + 32 KB (per core) L2 cache 256 KB (per core) L3 cache (MB) 20 Platform Dell PowerEdge R720 BIOS name and version Dell 2.5.2 BIOS settings Default Memory module(s) Total RAM in system (GB) 144 Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A-PB PC3-12800R Speed (MHz) 1600 Speed running in the system (MHz) 1333 Timing/Latency (tcl-trcd-trp-trasmin) 11-11-11-35 Size (GB) 8 GB Number of RAM module(s) 8 Chip organization Double Sided A Principled Technologies test report 4

Dell PowerEdge R720 (four) Rank 1 Operating system Name VMware vsphere 5.5 Build number 2068190 Language English Graphics Matrox G200e Graphics memory (MB) 256 Disk controller PERC H710P Mini Mono Firmware version 21.3.1-0004 Cache size (MB) 1,024 Hard drives First Disk Dell ST9300653SS Number of drives 3 Size (GB) 300 GB RPM 15k SAS 6.0 Second Disk Dell ST91000640SS Number of drives 13 Size (GB) 1,000 RPM 7,200 SAS 6.0 Ethernet adapters First network adapter Intel 10G Dual Port Ethernet Controller X520/I350 Integrated Second network adapter Intel Dual Port Ethernet Controller X520/I350 PCIe Figure 2: Detailed configuration information for our servers. A Principled Technologies test report 5

APPENDIX B HOW WE TESTED Simulating a hard drive failure Dell installed the SupportAssist service on the Dell system with ProSupport Plus. Using a tool provided by Dell, we simulated a hard drive failure that produced a hard drive failure alert in Dell SupportAssist. Dell SupportAssist automated monitoring and response gathered information on the issue and sent that information to Dell Support. The differences in hard drive failure methodology between the Dell system with SupportAssist technology and the system without it do not affect the tech support data, because the cause of the failure is irrelevant to Dell technical support staff, who works only to resolve the issue for the customer. We measured only the time to resolve the issue and not the drive failure simulation. Running the hard drive failure test On the Dell system with SupportAssist technology 1. Remove the good disk, and insert the bad disk for testing. 2. Allow SupportAssist to capture the failure details. 3. Wait for Dell Support to contact us via email or phone. 4. Note the date and time, and stop the clock. A Principled Technologies test report 6

ABOUT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES Principled Technologies, Inc. 1007 Slater Road, Suite 300 Durham, NC, 27703 www.principledtechnologies.com We provide industry-leading technology assessment and fact-based marketing services. We bring to every assignment extensive experience with and expertise in all aspects of technology testing and analysis, from researching new technologies, to developing new methodologies, to testing with existing and new tools. When the assessment is complete, we know how to present the results to a broad range of target audiences. We provide our clients with the materials they need, from market-focused data to use in their own collateral to custom sales aids, such as test reports, performance assessments, and white papers. Every document reflects the results of our trusted independent analysis. We provide customized services that focus on our clients individual requirements. Whether the technology involves hardware, software, Web sites, or services, we offer the experience, expertise, and tools to help our clients assess how it will fare against its competition, its performance, its market readiness, and its quality and reliability. Our founders, Mark L. Van Name and Bill Catchings, have worked together in technology assessment for over 20 years. As journalists, they published over a thousand articles on a wide array of technology subjects. They created and led the Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation, which developed such industry-standard benchmarks as Ziff Davis Media s Winstone and WebBench. They founded and led etesting Labs, and after the acquisition of that company by Lionbridge Technologies were the head and CTO of VeriTest. Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability: PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER, PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S TESTING. CUSTOMER S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN. A Principled Technologies test report 7