Public Testimony. as presented to. Advisory Committee on Increasing Competitive Integrated Employment for Individuals with Disabilities (ACICIEID)



Similar documents
REHABILITATION ACT AS AMENDED BY WIOA

OF DISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS

STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCIES STATE REHABILITATION COUNCILS CLIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Janet LaBreck, Commissioner May 12, 2015

Transition to Careers Subcommittee April 11, 2016

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Frequently Asked Questions July 22, 2014

TWC Input on WIOA NPRM Title IV

These goals, related strategies and data indicators are addressed in detail in Attachment 4.11(c)(1).

The Rehabilitation Act: Increasing Independence

Illinois Disability Employment Initiative Local Innovation Projects Request for Application October 2014

Vocational Rehabilitation

Brain Injury Association of New Jersey

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules

Statement by. Lynnae Ruttledge. Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration

Disability Services: Structure and Funding

WIA and Rehabilitation Act Reauthorization: Finally Done! By David Hoff Co-Chair, APSE Public Policy Committee

CMCS Informational Bulletin

Sheltered Workshops and the Subminimum Wage in North Carolina: Incentives and Accountability

PL : The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992

College of Employment Services

GW HEATH Resource Center Non-Degree Postsecondary Options For Individuals with Disabilities By Mario Payne

Rehabilitation Act Reauthorization Recommendations As of March 26th

RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF REHABILITATION SERVICES Section POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Rev.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES WHAT IS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT?

College Promise Campaign 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 230, Washington, DC, 20006

Back to Work with Social Security Disability Insurance

Supported Employment/Customized Employment Matrix The distinction between demand employment and a customized relationship

Employment After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

July 22, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES. Ensuring That Employment and Training Programs Are Job-Driven

EMPLOYMENT AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION ISSUES FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS. A Report to the Obama-Biden Presidential Transition Team

Proposed Position Paper: Rehabilitation Act Reauthorization and Supported Employment

The Arc of Texas 84th Legislature Priorities

Guide. for Hiring People with Disabilities

Business Strategies that Work: A FRAMEWORK FOR DISABILITY INCLUSION

DHHS Workforce Programs

Who is considered to be an individual with a disability status?

American Association of Community Colleges Association of Community College Trustees

Service Area Plan. Department of Rehabilitation Services. Vocational Rehabilitation Services

SECTION 14C OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT:

Revisions to TCDD Position Statements Tab 13

The South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department A Working Solution

Workers Compensation Vocational Rehabilitation System

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

WIOA Getting Down to Business

WIOA. Implications of the new Workforce Innovation and Opportunities Act on Vocational Rehabilitation Services

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE. Diversity Management Plan

Report to Michigan on Recommendations for Systems Transformation Related to Employment First

Department on Disability Services

Employment Outcomes for WI DVR (Updated January of 2011) (Reviewed May 2014)

Each of the three programs funded under the DD Act have a unique role in carrying out the DD Act, the programs include:

Michael W. Morris 1667 K Street, NW Suite 640 * Washington, DC (202) * mmorris@ndi-inc.org

Department of Labor Customer Service Plan Department of Labor. Customer Service Plan 2011

The Vocational Rehabilitation System in Texas

Who are we? What do we do? How can we help?

The Earned Income Tax Credit: Capitalizing on Tax Incentives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND CONSENT DECREE

MINORITY SERVING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM

7. Independent Living for People with Disabilities and Other Special Populations

Providing WIPA Services to Veterans with Disabilities Part 1

Janet LaBreck U. S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Avenue SW Room 5086 Potomac Center Plaza (PCP) Washington, D.C

Page 705 TITLE 38 VETERANS BENEFITS 4301 CHAPTER 43 EMPLOYMENT AND REEM- PLOYMENT RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES

Summary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

FY 2017 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION. Community Service Employment for Older Americans

The US Department of Labor (USDOL) has clear

Workforce Investment Act Native American Employment and Training Council

Improving Employment Outcomes for Adolescents and Adults with Neuro-Cognitive-Behavioral Deficits

Youth Career Development

Article 04. ALASKA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD Sec Alaska Workforce Investment Board.

TESTIMONY OF ILLINOIS STATE REP. TERRY PARKE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL) SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS

FY 2010 PERFORMANCE PLAN Department on Disability Services

Health Reform and the AAP: What the New Law Means for Children and Pediatricians

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

POST SCHOOL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

State Leadership and Innovation in Disability Employment. Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. United States Senate.

Overview of the Current Problems in the Long-Term Care System

Discussion and Guidance Items Proposed Eligible Training Provider List Administrative Policy Jay Barber

Employment First IN MICHIGAN

Social Security Disability Benefits: The Impact of Employment

Federal Programs That Can Fund Employment for Homeless People 1

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) recognizes the challenges facing our

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT[281]

Idaho Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

Service Area Plan. Department of Rehabilitation Services. Community Rehabilitation Programs

Workforce Development Resources. Priscilla R. Tyson Chair, Workforce Development Committee

REI NETWORK WEBINAR: AMERICAN DREAM EMPLOYMENT NETWORK. November 11, :00 4:00 pm EDT

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Sections 501 and 505

PARTNERSHIPS FOR OPENING DOORS

STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION

Public Law th Congress An Act

What s in the Healthcare Law for you and your Business

Summary of Vocational Rehabilitation Rights: Eligibility for Services

East Bay Innovations

Measuring the Performance of North Carolina s Workforce Development System. January 2015

JAN system; department of business, economic development, and. tourism; and department of labor and industrial relations

Entrepreneurs drive America s economy, accounting for the majority of our

WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) PROGRAM OVERVIEW

AZ ASSOCIATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (AAED) AZ Basic Economic Development Course JANUARY 13, 2015

REVIEW OF EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAMS. Report to; Governor Terence R. McAuliffe. Senator Walter A. Stosch, Co-Chair, Senate Finance Committee

Testimony of Charissa Raynor Executive Director, SEIU Healthcare NW Training Partnership

Ohio s Path to Employment First

Transcription:

1501 M Street, NW 7 th Floor Washington, DC 20005 202.349.4259 (PHONE) 202.785.1756 (FAX) Public Testimony as presented to Advisory Committee on Increasing Competitive Integrated Employment for Individuals with Disabilities (ACICIEID) March 24-25, 2015 by Terry R. Farmer, CEO, ACCSES When Congress enacted Section 609 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended by Section 461 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (PL 113-128) and created the Advisory Committee on Increasing Competitive Integrated Employment for Individuals with Disabilities (ACICIEID), it charged the Committee with the task of studying, preparing findings, conclusions and recommendations for the Secretary of Labor on: (1) ways to increase the employment opportunities for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities or other individuals with significant disabilities in competitive integrated employment; (2) the use of the certificate program carried out under section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 214(c)) for the employment of individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, or other individuals with significant disabilities; and (3) ways to improve oversight of the use of such certificates. Congress thus recognized the need to improve employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities and to improve the administration of the 14(c) program. Congress directed this Committee to recommend the most sensible and practical reforms to improve opportunities for all. ACCSES is pleased to contribute its views on such reforms. What We Believe Our Values and Guiding Principles 1) We embrace the precept embedded in numerous disability-specific laws that disability is a natural part of the human experience that in no way diminishes the rights of individuals with significant disabilities to achieve the four goals of disability policy articulated in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Equality of opportunity (individualization, effective and meaningful access to services and supports, and administration of programs in the most integrated setting appropriate); Full participation (informed choice and self-determination based on one s strengths, interests, priorities, needs, abilities and capabilities); Live independently; and

Enjoy economic self-sufficiency. 2) We recognize that work is a valued activity both for the individual and society. We believe that work provides both tangible and intangible benefits. Work helps people achieve independence and economic self-sufficiency. Work also gives people purpose, dignity, self-esteem, and a sense of accomplishment and pride. Individuals, including individuals with disabilities, should enjoy every opportunity to pursue careers, participate in the workforce and engage actively in the economic marketplace. 3) We abhor discrimination and worker exploitation; we support initiatives to protect individuals with disabilities from discrimination and exploitation. We believe that we must draw a clear line in prohibiting and preventing employers from taking advantage of persons with significant disabilities. 4) We respect the inherent value of each person we support. We provide services and supports tailored to each individual s strengths, priorities, needs desires, abilities and capabilities. We foster independence and community participation among individuals we serve, enhancing their quality of life. Individuals are empowered to maximize their potential through the provision of resources and supports necessary for increased independence and inclusion in the community. 5) Consistent with the right of individuals with significant disabilities to make informed choices and with the principle of self-determination, we support a full array of community-based employment opportunities for persons with the most significant disabilities provided by qualified rehabilitation professionals, including supported employment and customized employment opportunities provided in competitive, integrated settings; self-employment; and employment opportunities in skill development centers and disability-focused non-profit businesses operated by accredited community rehabilitation programs (CRPs). We also support federal policy that facilitates employment options for all individuals, including those who do not meet productivity standards, without or without reasonable accommodations. [Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act] 6) We believe that public policy should encourage and facilitate efforts to find competitive integrated employment opportunities (at or above the minimum or prevailing wage) as the presumptive, priority outcome. For those who have not been exposed to competitive integrated employment, public policy should also encourage and facilitate ongoing discovery and exposure to alternative career exploration in competitive integrated employment. 7) The right of individuals with significant disabilities to make informed choices should include the right to work in skill development centers and disability-focused non-profit businesses operated by accredited CRPs. These centers and businesses use qualified rehabilitation professionals to provide individualized jobs, ongoing services and supports (including door-to-door transportation), and job stability and security. The opportunity to work in a skill development center or disability-focused non-profit business may be temporary while the individual develops job skills, explores the world of work, and identifies their own interests and talents. For these individuals, CRPs facilitate placement in competitive, integrated employment, either directly or through support by, collaboration with, or referral to publicly-supported programs providing funding for vocational rehabilitation and necessary ongoing services and supports. 2

For other individuals with significant disabilities, the opportunity to work in a skill development center or disability-focused non-profit business may be long term given the individual s strengths, interests, capacities, desires, and ongoing needs for supports and services. This same right to informed choice and self-determination should extend to employment opportunities that include job crews and enclaves. 8) We recognize that some individuals with significant disabilities may not be able to meet standards and perform the essential functions of a job (with or without reasonable accommodations) and as a result are not currently employable at the federal or state minimum wage or prevailing wage. In order to enable such individuals to work and receive the benefits of working, Congress enacted Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In the language of the legislation, Section 14(c) is designed to prevent the curtailment of opportunities for employment of persons with significant disabilities by allowing the payment of special minimum wages commensurate with their level of productivity (skillsbased wages). Without Section 14(c), these individuals would have limited or no opportunities to work, which could have the effect of forcing them to stay at home, enter day habilitation centers (if a space were available) or otherwise engage in unproductive and unsatisfactory activities. In short, eliminating or phasing out skills-based wages would likely result in many individuals with significant disabilities receiving no pay whatsoever, instead of a skills-based wage, and would deny them the tangible as well as the intangible benefits of work. In addition, such a policy would likely result in creaming or cherry-picking (i.e., excluding those with the most significant disabilities in favor of those with more moderate disabilities). 9) Based on information from the employment marketplace, employment-related training services and supports should target areas of present and future workforce growth. Input from employers is critical to effectively direct employment-related training and services. 10) A nation that has a strong workforce has a workforce that is inclusive and offers any person, with or without disabilities, an opportunity to engage in activities that support and/or enhance their own defined personal and self-sufficiency goals. To accomplish this vision we believe: The system must provide seamless access to services, timely response to individuals needs, and be inclusive to enable any and all individuals the opportunity to seek and gain employment. States must have in place effective partnerships with businesses to meet their hiring needs and the needs of job seekers for the jobs they offer. This collaboration must include resources to make it possible for individuals to obtain and retain employment. It is imperative that the needs of large and small business owners be met. Systems developed must have true accountability occurring on all levels by assuring that: o BOTH job seekers and businesses are satisfied we need both business and ALL residents to feel our nation wants and needs them in their workforce; 3

o Businesses are educated, engaged, and supported in their quest to hire, train and retain employees that help them meet their bottom lines; o Individuals are assisted to find, choose, and maintain employment which matches the person s career goals, interests, and skills; and o Critical data on the attainment of outcomes in the system is collected so true progress throughout our country can be objectively measured. Recommendations (In General) We support initiatives to enhance meaningful opportunities, options, and choices for individuals with the most significant disabilities, including enhanced opportunities to work in competitive integrated employment (at or above the minimum or prevailing wage) and self-employment. More specifically, we support: 1) Increasing focus, emphasis, and priority on youth with disabilities across all systems and agencies, including all federal employment projects and proposals (for example, internships, job readiness, AmeriCorps, Job Corps, and mentoring programs). We also support strengthening statutory connections between IDEA and the Rehabilitation Act as well as the Social Security Act, SCHIP, Medicaid, and the developmental disabilities and other systems to require smooth transition from school to work. In particular, we support implementation of Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act, as added by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, which would ensure that youth and their families are made aware of alternatives and opportunities for competitive, integrated employment before participating in programs paying a special wage under Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 2) Funding systems change initiatives designed to expand the availability of supported employment and customized employment in competitive, integrated settings (at or above the minimum wage), selfemployment, and other employment-related supports for individuals with disabilities, particularly for youth with disabilities, by creating additional incentives to operate such programs, including funding for long-term services and supports and ensuring seamless transitions between funding streams. These initiatives also need to include support and technical assistance for CRPs that want to expand and improve the array of services they provide, including supported employment services, customized employment services, transition services, and services leading to self-employment. 3) Funding research and demonstration projects to test different types of incentives, wage subsidies, flexible funding and other strategies to determine what works best to improve wages for individuals with significant disabilities currently paid below the minimum or prevailing wage and expand employment options. Research should also test improved job placement techniques such as on-thejob training, trial work, use of job coaches and natural supports. Research should also identify the full cost implications of these approaches. 4) Incentivizing the adoption and utilization of best practices to enhance the quality of the work environment, including adopting approaches for enhancing productivity and wages, such as the use of assistive technology, career advancement, and promotion in various work environments. 4

5) Expanding and improving the Work Incentives Planning and Assistance Act and the work incentive provisions in SSI and SSDI programs and expanding the availability of health care, including Medicaid and Medicare. Also, providing better education and targeted outreach to increase community knowledge of SSI and SSDI work incentives, including increased support for benefits counseling. 6) Improving state workforce delivery infrastructures that increase successful employment outcomes such as one-stop career centers, vocational schools, vocational rehabilitation programs, community and four-year colleges (disability and career services). 7) Expanding the focus on employer and business-related outreach initiatives. 8) Implementing and enforcing affirmative action programs under Section 501 and 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, including changes in the Section 503 regulations to include goals and timetables. 9) Modernizing and more fully utilizing the AbilityOne program and expanding the utilization of State Use contracting programs throughout the United States. 10) Implementing and enforcing existing laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act that can improve employment outcomes for people with the most significant disabilities. 11) Utilizing accredited providers and qualified rehabilitation professionals in the delivery of employment services and supports. Recommendations (Section 14(c) Program) We support the following recommendations for improving the Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, including efforts to foster increased employment, minimize exploitation, and strengthen enforcement and sanctions when exploitation does occur. 1) Establish an ongoing advisory committee at the Wage-Hour Division, which includes community rehabilitation providers, tasked to review the administration of the Section 14(c) program and make recommendations for streamlining and simplifying the program to avoid unintended violations and enhance accountability and accuracy of determinations. 2) Significantly increase funding to enforce wage and hour laws for the two agencies that administer the Section 14(c) provisions the DOL Wage and Hour Division and the Office of the Solicitor. More specifically, direct the Department of Labor to substantially increase: The availability of funding for technical assistance provided directly by DOL or others to employers to maximize voluntary compliance; and The number of onsite investigations to ensure compliance. 3) Add increased penalties for willful violations. 4) Increase administrative funding to the Social Security Administration to improve oversight of the representative payee system. 5

5) Develop and implement a plan to make information about the Section 14(c) program more readily accessible to workers themselves, their families and authorized representatives as well as to the public. Information should be available about the types of disabilities of the workers participating, and the number of workers receiving wages under the Section 14(c) regulations. We oppose initiatives that would phase out and eventually repeal Section 14(c) for persons with the most significant disabilities. 1) Individuals with the most significant disabilities must not be denied the opportunity to work at a wage that reflects their skills and productivity. 2) Eliminating, repealing, or restricting Section 14(c) will simply have the effect of denying the opportunity to work for individuals with the most significant disabilities who cannot meet productivity standards (with or without reasonable accommodations). Conclusion We believe that the intent of Congress regarding the principles and goals outlined in disability policy including the ADA, WIOA, IDEA and the FLSA for those with significant disabilities has not been fully achieved and much more work needs to be accomplished. We believe that every individual with a disability should have the opportunity to secure work consistent with the principle of self-determination and the right to make informed choices based on one s strengths, interests, priorities, needs, abilities and capabilities. We support the purpose of the ACICIEID in helping to ensure individuals with disabilities have expanded opportunities for competitive, integrated employment. We support the need to make improvements in the administration of the 14(c) program. ACCSES stands ready to assist the ACICIEID with its work as it moves forward. 6