Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

Similar documents
Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Arizona s Large Fires Suppression vs. Restoration. WESTCAS Fall 2011 Meeting Bruce Hallin Manager, Water Rights and Contracts October 27, 2011

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Walter Dasheno Governor Santa Clara Pueblo

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

7.0 Stream Restoration

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

PIRU FIRE BURNED AREA EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

LOS ANGELES COUNTY S FLOODING HISTORY:

SFPUC Experience with Rim Fire

Response Levels and Wildland Fire Decision Support System Content Outline

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

NPS Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) and Burned Area Rehabilitation (BAR) in the Southern California Landscape


Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Case Study: The History of the San Juan Headwaters Forest Health Partnership

Increasing the Pace of Restoration and Job Creation on Our National Forests

How To Assess An Area For Erosion

Swamp Area Passive Treatment System Kettle Creek Watershed, Clinton County, PA

Integrating Landscape Restoration and CWPP

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Avison Management Services Ltd. COMPANY PROFILE

Potential Economic Benefits to Santa Ana River Watershed of Forest Restoration. Barbara Wyse, Senior Economist

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Post-Flood Assessment

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Roaring Fork Valley Restoration Strategy

Communities and Fire Restoration. The Role of Communities in Restoring Fire as a Natural Process

Outlet stabilization structure

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Ecosystem Restoration in British Columbia An Overview. Greg Anderson Provincial Ecosystem Restoration Manager 2009

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Key programs and relevant studies

THE TOTAL COST OF WILDFIRES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TAXPAYERS AND POLICYMAKERS

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Project Theory-Climate Change and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Adaption in the Klamath Basin

Appendix D: Federal Agencies Hazard Mitigation Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and Recovery

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

The Rising Cost of Fire Operations: Effects on the Forest Service s Non-Fire Work

Interagency Burned Area Emergency Response Guidebook Interpretation of Department of the Interior 620 DM 3 and USDA Forest Service Manual 2523

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

Transcription:

Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

Fire Started: Saturday June 23, 2012

Fire Progression June 23 2500 acres June 24 3600 acres June 25 4500 acres June 26 15622 acres June 27-28 16750 acres June 29 17073 acres June 30 17650 acres July 1-6 18247 acres

Fire Contained: Tuesday July 10, 2012 Total Acres: 18,247 Ownership National Forest 14,422 acres Department of Defense 147 acres Private 3,678 acres

USFS BAER Team Burned Area Response Team Multi-disciplinary Inter-agency Rapid assessment of fire impacts Develop, recommend & implement initial treatments

USFS BAER Soil Burn Severity Low 7,856 acres Moderate 7,286 acres High 3,375 acres Unburned 842 acres

Low 7,586 (41%)

Moderate 7,286 (40%)

16 Waldo Canyon Fire

High 3,375 (19%)

18 Waldo Canyon Fire

Energy System Fire Damage 34.5kV Power Line ~24 poles compromised Restoration work underway Stabilization of hill slopes needed to protect line from future damage 19

USFS BAER Team Treatments

Impacts and Restoration Flood Flows Sediment Erosion Water Quality Watershed Stabilization Reforestation 21

22 Waldo Canyon Fire

Northfield Drainage 23

Northfield Drainage Flood Damage Caretaker s House Access Road 24

W. Monument Creek Canyon 25

Northfield Water System Damage Northfield Pipeline Pine Valley Pipeline 26

Pine Valley/McCullough Impacts Debris & Storm Flows Erosion & Sedimentation Pipeline Vaults Diversion Dam 27

Sedimentation Impacts Culverts and Crossings 28

Water Quality Impacts 29

Water Quality Impacts PAST (Right after Fire & Storm Events) Major ash and sediment flows in creeks Increases in Dissolved Iron & Manganese levels in reservoirs and stream intakes Slight increase in Total Organic Carbon and Lower ph Never exceeded a Maximum Contaminant Level under Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) 30

Water Quality Impacts CURRENT (In Between Storm Events) Typical dissolved Iron & Manganese levels in reservoirs and stream intakes Slight increase in Total Organic Carbon and Lower ph No exceedances of Maximum Contaminant Levels 31

Water Quality Impacts CURRENT (After Storm Events) Increase of sediment downstream (however ash is decreasing) Slight increase in dissolved Iron & Manganese in reservoirs and stream intakes Slight increase in Total Organic Carbon, Lower ph, and alkalinity No exceedances of Maximum Contaminant Levels under SDWA 32

Water Quality Impacts FUTURE (Expected) Same impacts as current Waldo Canyon Fire (Action: Investigating application of Potassium Permanganate at source water intakes) A higher increase of Total Organic Carbon (Action: Investigating application of granulated activated carbon at Water Treatment Plants) Potential for increases in nutrient levels (Action: Increased monitoring and treatment evaluations) No exceedances of Maximum Contaminant Levels under SDWA 33

BAER Team Treatments Northfield Area

Next Steps to Protect Systems & Resources Watershed Stabilization and Restoration Obtain Approvals for Work on US Forest Lands Partner with Experienced Agencies Implement Immediate Storm Flow & Sediment Stabilization Assess & Repair Infrastructure Stabilize Watersheds Additional Hill Slope & Drainage Treatments & Reforestation Evaluate Funding Alternatives Waldo Canyon Fire

Goals of CSU Forest Management Program Protect water supplies, infrastructure, & system reliability Conduct forest treatments to Improve forest health Reduce wildfire hazards Meet other natural resource objectives Invest in healthier forests rather than costly restoration and system repairs Pre Treatment Post Treatment

CSU Forest Management Program Primary Elements: Forest Management and Restoration: Responsible for CSU managed properties Assist with efforts on federal lands Wildfire Suppression: Local and regional planning and coordination Utilization of CSU Wildland Fire Team to protect CSU assets Pre & Post-Fire Planning: Waldo Canyon Fire Assessment of critical watersheds, priorities, opportunities, and constraints Advance Prescribe Fire Program Complete and maintain forest treatment investments

Pikes Peak Watershed Forest Management Plan Pikes Peak Collection System Plan developed in 1986 16,000 acres Work conducted through cooperative agreement CSFS Management Goals: Less Susceptible to Wildfire Protect and Enhance Water Resources Protect Water and Electric Infrastructure Enhance Wildlife and Fisheries Habitat, Scenic and Recreational Amenities Budget - $250,000 annually

Pikes Peak Forest Management Plan

USFS Forest Collaborative Partnership Catamount Project Treatment of 23,000 acres CSU funding EA & implementation Formalize CSU/USFS partnership Treatments and restoration Suppression Restoration Funding Potential projects Tennessee Creek EA Monument Creek EA Waldo Canyon Fire

CSU Wild Land Fire Team 26 Member team created pursuant to USFS cooperative agreements Provides initial attack suppression Autonomy to protect Utilities assets Mutual aid resource for others Supports prescribed fire program

CSU Prescribed Fire (Rx) Program Rx Objectives: Reintroduce fire back into the natural forest ecology Promote forest health and resiliency Maintain prior forest treatment efforts and investments Cost effective treatment Excellent live fire training Agency collaboration

Item V-A Governance Monitoring Report Questions? Colorado Springs Utilities Catamount Wildland Fire Team Making a Difference in the Community