Core Benchmarks: Transportation

Similar documents
Supply Chain Metrics Data for You to Compare Against

Finished Goods Inventory Management

Cycle Counting. Consortium Report. Increase Inventory Accuracy & Eliminate Wall-to-Wall Physical Inventory. Benchmarking & Best Practices

Best Practices for Transportation Management

Less-Than-Truckload Service Markets

Current Trends and the Potential for Automation in International Transportation Management. Current Trends. Automation

Transportation Management Case Studies. Memorandum 707

WHERE Technology & Logistics MERGE

How a Single-Platform TMS Powers Logistics Services Companies to Success

State of The Freight Industry and Deferred LTL JOC Inland Distribution Conference

Transportation Management Systems Meeting the Challenges and Obtaining Results

Modeling Carrier Truckload Freight Rates in Spot Markets

The Down and Dirty Guide to LTL Shipping

Optimizing Freight Procurement

Grow Your Business, Serve Customers Better and Save Costs with Logistics Analytics

Welcome! Welcome to the Best Practices for Effective Less Than Truckload (LTL) Freight Shipping Webinar. Presented By

Focused Metrics. Tom Vander Weide G-3 Enterprises and Tom Patterson Saddle Creek Corporation

Web based tracking and tracing, low claims ratio and error free billing all add to our total service package.

WHAT IS LTL FREIGHT? A Guidebook for Beginners

US & CANADA Suppliers

APICS 2012 BIG DATA INSIGHTS AND INNOVATIONS Discovering emerging data practices in supply chain and operations management

Transportation Management Systems

HOW TO SELECT A LTL CARRIER

R2 LOGISTICS RELIABLE SERVICE. RELENTLESS PASSION.

Load Consolidation & Shipping

A Just-In-Time Supply Chain? Achieving Just-In-Time operational objectives requires the coordination of Production Planning, Sourcing and Logistics

A Forrester Consulting Thought Leadership Paper Commissioned By MetaPack. September 2014

Mode of Shipment Carrier Payee/Terms Threshold Rules

Transportation Benchmarking Survey

Count, manage and move: Warehouse inventory control strategies

APL Logistics. Free Carrier (FCA): Improving Supply Chain Performance

E-Fulfillment Trends Report

Gaining Efficiencies Through LTL Outsourcing

Nine Ways Food and Beverage Companies Can Use Supply Chain Design to Drive Competitive Advantage

ARC STRATEGIES. The Return on Investment of Managed Services for Transportation VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY JANUARY 2012

Valuable Metrics for Successful Supplier Management

To learn more about Trinity Logistics and our solutions:

Documenting Distribution Operations: FDA Validation Beyond the Laboratory and Manufacturing Facility

MARKETING BENCHMARKS REPORT 2014

Spend Analysis Delivers Big Benefits

Supply Chain Digest Tech Note:

Three Critical Components of the Specialty 3PL Experience. What should you expect from your supply chain partner?

An Improved Transportation Management System for Domestic Surface Transportation Needs

Meeting the Multi-channel Distribution Challenge

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

Innovative Web-based solutions help manage your van LTL operations

Globalization Drives Market Need for Supply Chain Segmentation: Research & Key Strategies

RedPrairie Transportation Management

3 rd Party Billing Instructions Page 1

RedPrairie > Transportation > White Paper. Driving Out Costs and Increasing Customer Service Through Advanced Transportation Management

MANAGED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

Canadian E-commerce Presents New Opportunities for U.S. Businesses

A New Model for Estimating Carbon Emissions from LTL Shipments

White paper. Outsourcing e-commerce logistics: pros and cons.

WHITE PAPER. How 3PLs Can Help with Small Business Growth

Supporting the Perfect Order: Collaborative S&OP and VMI

Map of Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB) to proposed GRI Business Activity Groups

The impact of ecommerce on Shippers, Transportation Providers, & 3PLs. Presented by Adam Robinson, Marketing Manager, Cerasis

PRESENCE, INTELLIGENCE AND CONFLICT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER E-COMMERCE

Best Practices in Managing Returns and Excess Inventory

Automated Business Intelligence

MWPVL. Leadership in Supply Chain and Logistics Consulting. Options to Improve Productivity at a Parts Distribution Center

The technology, experience. and expertise to solve. logistics challenges and. move products from origin. to destination, anywhere. in the world.

Canadian Ship-To-Store Programs Benefit Both Consumers And Retailers

Container design and types

GLOBAL PROPERTY Loss Prevention Engineering. Next

NGC s Global Sourcing/SCM Helps VF Corp. Achieve Supply Chain Excellence

WHITE PAPER Will Your Legacy ERP System Define Your Legacy? Making the Switch Can Help Secure Your Business and Your Reputation

Achieving Competitive Advantage Through Supply Chain Excellence. Jim Webb, Senior Vice President of Operations, Provista

Managing End-to-End Supply Chain Costs in a Down Economy

This paper describes a framework for designing the distribution network in a supply chain. Various

IndustryWeek Best Plants Benchmarking Database Sample Report Version 12.0

Barcoding, Incorporated

Endeavour Dynamics Offering

Getting your cargo Where you need it, When you need it.

ARC STRATEGIES. Return on Investment for Transportation Management Systems VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY NOVEMBER 2011

Fueling your supply chain for global growth. UPS Aerospace Logistics Solutions

Imports & Exports Made Easier with Global Trade Management Software

The Pressure Washer Industry Standard

Transcription:

Hot Topic Report Core Benchmarks: Transportation Spotlight on Metrics for Truckload, Less-Than-Truckload, and Parcel Supply Chain Consortium Benchmarking & Best Practices May 2013 www.supplychainconsortium.com

Table of Contents Introduction 3 Truckload Metrics 5 Less-Than-Truckload Metrics 14 Parcel Metrics 21 Report Authors 26 2

Introduction This report offers valuable insight into today s shipping and transportation industry. The data on the following pages represent survey responses across several industries including: Apparel and Footwear Department and Discount Stores Electronics Food and Beverage Home Products Industrial Commercial Manufacturers Personal Care Pharmaceutical 3

Introduction Manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) are all represented in the data, which has been formatted by quartile: Top = Leaders Second = Competitive Advantage Third = Competitive Disadvantage Fourth or Bottom = Opportunity 4

Truckload Metrics 5

Truckload Metrics On-Time Pickup Percentage (per the respondent company s requirements) 99.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 97.6% and <99.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 90.0% and <97.6% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0% Those leading the way in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 97.2%. 6

Truckload Metrics On-Time Delivery Percentage (per customer requirements) 98.5% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 96.0% and <98.5% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 92.0% and <96.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <92.0% The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 98.5%. The median value is 96.5%. 7

Truckload Metrics Orders Shipped Complete On-Time (OSCOT) Percentage 99.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 96.0% and <99.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 93.0% and <96.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <93.0% The leaders in OSCOT are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 96.4%. 8

Truckload Metrics Orders Delivered Complete On-Time (ODCOT) Percentage 98.5% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 95.0% and <98.5% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 90.0% and <95.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0% The leaders in ODCOT are capable of greater than 98.5%. The median value is 95.0%. 9

Truckload Metrics Billing Error Rate Percentage 0.1% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 1.0% and >0.1% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 4.0% and >1.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0% The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 1.0%. 10

Truckload Metrics Claims Incidence Rate Percentage 0.2% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 1.0% and >0.2% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 4.0% and >1.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0% The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.2%. The median value is 0.9%. 11

Truckload Metrics Average Capacity Utilization Percentage (if weighing out) 85.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 75.0% and <85.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 70.0% and <75.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <70.0% The leaders in average capacity utilization (if weighing out) are capable of greater than 85.0%. The median value is 80.0%. Some extremely heavy products are expected to have very low utilization. 12

Truckload Metrics Average Capacity Utilization Percentage (if cubing out) 95.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 93.0% and <95.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 90.0% and <93.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0% The leaders in average capacity utilization (if cubing out) are capable of greater than 95.0%. The median value is 93.5%. Large cube products or unusually shaped products may not be capable of good utilization if cubing out. 13

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics 14

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics On-Time Pickup Percentage (per the respondent company s requirements) 99.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 96.0% and <99.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 90.0% and <96.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0% The leaders in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 97.0%. 15

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics On-Time Delivery Percentage (per customer requirements) 97.0% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 93.0% and <97.0% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 88.0% and <93.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <88.0% The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 97.0%. The median value is 93.5%. 16

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics Orders Shipped Complete On-Time (OSCOT) Percentage 99.9% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 97.0% and <99.9% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 92.0% and <97.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <92.0% The leaders in OSCOT are capable of greater than 99.9%. The median value is 97.2%. 17

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics Orders Delivered Complete On-Time (ODCOT) Percentage 97.9% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 94.0% and <97.9% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 89.0% and <94.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <89.0% The leaders in ODCOT are capable of greater than 97.9%. The median value is 94.5%. 18

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics Billing Error Rate Percentage 0.1% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 2.0% and >0.1% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 5.0% and >2.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >5.0% The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 2.0%. 19

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics Claims Incidence Rate Percentage 0.1% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 1.0% and >0.1% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 3.0% and >1.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >3.0% The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 0.9%. 20

Parcel Metrics Parcel Metrics 21

Parcel Metrics On-Time Pickup Percentage (per the respondent company s requirements) 99.5% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 98.5% and <99.5% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 97.0% and <98.5% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <97.0% The leaders in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.5%. The median value is 98.7%. 22

Parcel Metrics On-Time Delivery Percentage (per customer requirements) 98.9% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 98.0% and <98.9% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 95.0% and <98.0% Opportunity (bottom quartile) <95.0% The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 98.9%. The median value is 98.1%. 23

Parcel Metrics Billing Error Rate Percentage 0.3% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 1.6% and >0.3% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 4.0% and >1.6% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0% The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.3%. The median value is 1.5%. 24

Parcel Metrics Claims Incidence Rate Percentage 0.2% Competitive Advantage (second quartile) 1.4% and >0.2% Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) 2.0% and >1.4% Opportunity (bottom quartile) >2.0% The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.2%. The median value is 1.3%. 25

SUPPLY CHAIN EXCELLENCE SUPPLY CHAIN EXCELLENCE Report Authors To learn more about benchmarking and best practices, additional resources are available to members through the Supply Chain Consortium: www.supplychainconsortium.com Qualified companies may join the Supply Chain Consortium s LinkedIn or Xing Group: www.supplychainconsortium.com/rc/connections.asp Bruce Tompkins Executive Director Chris Ferrell Director 6870 Perry Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27616 (919) 855-5527 Office (919) 345-0479 Mobile 6435 Hazeltine National Drive Suite 105 Orlando, FL 32822 (407) 362-0369 Office (919) 624-3947 Mobile btompkins@tompkinsinc.com cferrell@tompkinsinc.com 26