ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF THE 2013-2020 ETS PROPOSAL ON THE EUROPEAN CEMENT INDUSTRY. Final project report Executive summary



Similar documents
Final Report. Amendment to the European Directive on Emission Trading: Impact on the German Cement Industry. Prepared by: Düsseldorf, June 2008

Fuel cell microchp: Greener and cheaper energy for all

Maximization versus environmental compliance

Heating technology mix in a future German energy system dominated by renewables

Chile Economy-wide implications of a carbon tax in the Chilean electricity generation sector

2050 LOW CARBON ECONOMY Executive Summary THE EUROPEAN CEMENT ASSOCIATION

Tipco Asphalt Public Company Limited (TASCO)

Carbon Market Data publishes the EU ETS Company Rankings 2014

Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EU ETS post 2012

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

Role of Natural Gas in a Sustainable Energy Future

TRADING GERMAN POWER BY USING A CLIMATE SPREAD SIGNAL

Grontmij N.V. Analyst presentation. Financial results Q April 2014

Mobilizing capital towards a low-carbon economy

Nomura Conference. Biomass: the 4 th Energy Source. June February 2011

Dii creating a market for renewable energy from the deserts in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East

Embodied CO 2 e of UK cement, additions and cementitious material

CO 2 taxes and emission trading in Norway. Nordic seminar Tokyo 18. juni 2010 Frode Finsås Ministry of Finance, Norway

Netherlands National Energy Outlook 2014

Installations versus Companies. Making the right choice in the design of an Emissions Trading Scheme. Policy Paper. Dr. Felix Chr.

Nuclear power is part of the solution for fighting climate change

Building a Low-Carbon Economy The UK's Contribution to Tackling Climate Change.

Climate change policies and the UK business sector: Overview, impacts & suggestions for reform

2. Executive Summary. Emissions Trading Systems in Europe and Elsewhere

Interview: Aurélie Faure, Financial Analyst at Dexia Asset Management

European Emissions Trading Scheme The German Experience

CMM PRE-FINANCE INFORMATION. Krasnogorskaya Mine Methane Utilisation Synopsis. Entire report available from Uglemetan

An ILEX Energy Report August 2011 edition WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICE PROJECTIONS FOR BELGIUM R E P O R T

Curriculum Vitae Nicolas Brizard

The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) Legislation and Contractors/Subcontractors

Summary of the Impact assessment for a 2030 climate and energy policy framework

Travelex. Helping customers to send and spend money around the world. March 2014

EU ETS structural reform: what is on the agenda? June 29, 2015, Brussels

ENERGY PRIORITIES OF THE POLISH PRESIDENCY OF THE EU COUNCIL: THE CZECH PERSPECTIVE

Global Climate Disclosure Framework for Oil & Gas Companies

A new direction in energy?

MANAGING INFORMATION CDP ROADMAP GUIDE CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTING:

THE UK CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAMME AND EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE. Gabrielle Edwards United Kingdom

Is natural gas the key energy for a low carbon future? 16 September, 2015 BP Forum, Berlin

Alternative fuels in cement manufacturing

Avoiding fossil fuel costs with wind energy

LEVEL 4 CERTIFICATE IN MANAGEMENT CONSULTING 10331

Oil and Gas - Ukraine, a Case Study

Climate change policies and the UK business sector: Overview, impacts & suggestions for reform

This document outlines Wales & West Utilities Business Plan for the next regulatory period from

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services

The changing role of gas transmission organisations

GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY MARKET OUTLOOK 2013

Conserve Socket Power Timer. User Guide

Decarbonising the Maritime Supply Chain

Work package 3 Comparison of member state approaches

EUROPE S LEADING ONLINE FASHION DESTINATION Capital Markets Day: Advertising Services 25 March 2015

CEMENT SECTOR NAMA READINESS PROGRAMME IN VIETNAM CLIMATE. Nordic Partnership initiative: SOLUTIONS #NNCS NEW NORDIC

Consumer Cost Effectiveness of CO 2 Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Markets. Jared Moore and Jay Apt.

Big Impacts from Big Data UNION SQUARE ADVISORS LLC

TWG 5: GHG Risk Management Conference Call: February 27, EST / CET

Key Solutions CO2 Assessment

The European Chlor-Alkali industry: an electricity intensive sector exposed to carbon leakage

Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions

FINANCING PERSPECTIVE

The current electricity costs of energy-intensive industries in Germany

Country profiles: Austria

How To Build A Wave Energy Power Station In Germany

THE COSTS OF DECARBONISING ELECTRICITY GENERATION

CCS Roadmap. The regulatory framework

TTIP The Energy Conundrum Cheap or Clean?

Rating Methodology by Sector. Electric Power

Opportunities for the Georgian Hydropower industry to benefit from Directive 2009/28EC of the European Parliament

Polimex-Mostostal Group results 1-3Q 2012

Adelaide Brighton Ltd - Analyst. Analyst and investor meetings. Presented by: Mark Chellew Managing Director and CEO. April2013.

Enterprise Software Meets Marketing Technology UNION SQUARE ADVISORS LLC

Reducing Carbon Pollution in D.C s Renewable Portfolio Standard Will Clean the Air without Impacting Ratepayers. Frequently Asked Questions

The role of local, decentralised energy solutions is too often overlooked in the context of current EU policy priorities to increase energy supply

Nordex SE Conference Call Q Hamburg 13 November 2014

REVISED COBRA MODEL NOTICES ISSUED REFLECTING SUBSIDY EXTENSION

Some micro- and macro-economics of offshore wind*

NATURAL GAS - WHY SO LITTLE RECOGNITION?

Antonio Jose Cumbane (PhD) Maputo, 31 st May 2011

EU ETS Phase II The potential and scale of windfall profits in the power sector

North American Energy Independence A bump in the road

A guide to solid recovered fuel. Putting waste to good use and producing a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels

Analysis of the EU Renewable Directive by a TIMES-Norway

Pöyry Point of View: Shaping the next future. How will Lancashire shale gas impact the GB energy market?

UK content analysis of Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm operations and maintenance

Norwegian position on the proposed EU framework for climate and energy policies towards 2030

NAP II in Denmark The challenges

FINNGULF LNG LNG IMPORT TO FINLAND

Effects of a White Certificate trading scheme on the energy system of the EU-27

Recent Development of the Indian Cement Industry...

Cisco Supply Chain Sustainability FAQ

Macroeconomic. impact of the Wind Energy Sector in Belgium

The Emissions Reduction Fund what it means for you. How Australian businesses and the community can benefit from the Emissions Reduction Fund

Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation

Reducing CO2 emissions for Offshore oil and gas Operations under ETS. Margaret Christie, Environmental Advisor, UK Business Unit, Premier Oil UK Ltd

Towards a French Nuclear Phase-Out?


2008 Interim Results September 2008

ENVIRONMENTAL Product Declaration as per ISO and EN Akçansa Çimento Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. Portland Cement CEM I 42.

LONG-TERM OUTLOOK FOR GAS TO 2 35

Fact Sheet on China s energy sector and Danish solutions

Transcription:

ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF THE 2013-2020 ETS PROPOSAL ON THE EUROPEAN CEMENT INDUSTRY Final project report Executive summary November 2008

PROLOGUE BCG, in collaboration with and upon request of Cembureau, has assessed the impacts of the 2013-2020 ETS proposal on the EU cement industry. The analysis has been focused on the competitiveness of clinker and cement production in EU ETS countries vis-à-vis non-ets countries in year 2020, in order to assess the risk of relocation of EU production and its related implications in terms of employment, value added and global CO 2 emissions. To assess relative competitiveness in 2020, BCG has compared the expected cost of producing in the EU, assuming the carbon cost of CO 2 versus the cost of imports, including transportation from the plant of origin in non-ets countries. The production and transportation cost assessment has been entirely based on publicly available information. Appropriate methodologies based on such information have been developed to estimate all the cost components by country (or cluster of countries). The results of the cost assessments have been reviewed on a cost line basis with the local cement associations of the largest EU countries (major cement and clinker producers). Additionally, experts (both belonging to the BCG network and external to it) have been contacted to validate the data. The following report is an executive summary of the assessment of the impact of the 2013-2020 ETS proposal on the EU cement industry. In order to have a full understanding of the methodology, assumptions and overall conclusions, it is necessary to read the two final deliverables of the study: Carbon Leakage Assessment: Final Project Report (Word document) Carbon Leakage Assessment: Methodology and Assumptions (PowerPoint document) ii

DISCLAIMER Cembureau has asked BCG to make this report available at the request of Third Parties. In any event, BCG will not be responsible for any damages incurred or claims made by anyone as a result of or in connection with (a) any reproduction, disclosure or use of any information or materials so disclosed by BCG or (b) any conclusion reached or action taken by anyone other than Cembureau as a result of any such work or disclosure made by BCG. Recipients of this report agree that (i) the report has been developed by BCG for the use of Cembureau and has been or will be furnished to Third Parties solely for their information; (ii) recipients are responsible for conducting their own investigation with respect to the information contained in this report; and (iii) BCG makes no representations or warranties to Recipients with respect to this report and the information contained therein. Upon receiving the report, Recipients waive any rights and claims they may have at any time against BCG with regard to the report. Neither BCG nor any officer, director, employee, agent or representative of BCG (collectively "BCG Personnel") shall have any liability to any party as a result of, or in connection with, any claim made by any Third Party in connection with any act or omission by BCG or by any BCG Personnel in the course of rendering services for Cembureau. All services rendered by BCG at the request of Cembureau are rendered for Cembureau as BCG's client; no other party will be regarded as the client for whom any such services were rendered by BCG. iii

Executive summary In March 2007 the European Union (EU) agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 by 20% compared to 1990 levels. The European Trading System (ETS) will be a key mechanism to ensure the achievement of emission reduction targets. The current proposal of the EU ETS Directive (dated January 2008) for the 2013 to 2020 period limits overall emissions permits available for ETS sectors to the equivalent of 79% of 2005 levels. From 2013, these permits will be allocated through full auctioning for the power generation sector while for all the other ETS sectors (including the cement industry) 20% will be auctioned in 2013 and then linearly increased up to 100% by 2020. As an exception, the European Commission is considering applying a 100% free allocation to certain industries from 2013 onward, whenever it can be demonstrated that there is considerable risk of carbon leakage. Carbon leakage arises from the cost of CO 2 emission allowances that EU ETS sectors would have to pay. This would damage the competitiveness of certain sectors in favour of countries with no emission constraints, thus leading to offshoring production in these industries. Moreover, emissions will not be decreased on a global level, but rather displaced and possibly increased due to the additional emissions from transportation. This study examines how the additional carbon cost for the EU cement industry will affect its competitiveness vis-à-vis non-ets countries, thus putting cement production at risk of carbon leakage 1. In particular, the study analyzes the impact of the proposal of the Directive on clinker production as the key intermediate material for producing cement 2. Clinker is responsible for 100% of cement s direct emissions and is more exposed to the risk of offshoring because, on the one hand, it is easy to transport, with no need for special equipment, and on the other, customers in the EU are already accustomed to clinker produced in non-ets countries. The report also analyzes the possibility of importing cement. To do so, a more expensive logistic chain than clinker s is taken into account. Based on the expected cost of production in the EU assuming the carbon cost of CO 2 versus the cost of producing in non-ets countries, clinker and cement production in the EU is not competitive without free allowances allocation. As a result, the wise businessman will prefer to relocate production to more competitive countries, this leading to production offshoring. At CO 2 prices above 35/t (expected for the 2013-2020 period 3 ) the current proposal of the Directive will lead to the complete offshoring of the cement industry. At CO 2 price of 25/t 4, more than 80% of EU clinker production will be at risk of offshoring by 2020: 100% of the Italian, Greek, Polish and UK production, almost 100% of Spanish, ~75% of German and 65% of the French ~70% of the production of the smaller EU producers 5 1 For the purpose of this analysis, no carbon equalisation system has been taken into account to ensure that no distortion affects the cement industry s competitiveness. 2 Cement production is a carbon emission intensive process. A large part (~60%) of direct emissions come from the production process itself, due to the de-carbonation of limestone, the basic material for cement. The rest is related to fuel burning to heat up to 1,450 C the kilns where clinker is produced. 3 The EU forecast prices between 34 and 39/t; several analysts 35-40/t 4 June September 2008 CO2 average price ~ 25/t 1

Figure 1 illustrates the EU regions at risk of offshoring for different CO 2 prices. Figure 1 Sensitivity analyses show that, even with significant changes either in transportation or production costs, carbon leakage will still happen. Additionally, it will not be necessary to wait for 2020 to witness production capacity offshoring, as it will already accelerate in 2013 and continue in the following years if the current proposal of the Directive is applied to the cement industry. Production capacity in non-ets countries will not limit the relocation process, as their capacity will adjust according to EU demand. The global cement industry can build enough capacity to supply the EU markets from the most competitive non-ets countries if it is economically attractive. Likewise, the lack of infrastructure or shortage of resources will not prevent the relocation process either. Coal and petcoke cargos will be diverted from current destinations to non-ets countries, and infrastructures, if financially appealing, will be built in the medium and long-term. Cost pass-through, although not likely, will not influence offshoring decisions. EU integrated cement producers will eventually switch off kilns and take advantage of the cost pass-through to stay competitive vis-à-vis non-integrated producers 6. 5 Remaining EU countries. Countries with significant amount of exports can be particularly affected by the competition of imports from non-ets countries. The study has not considered the potential impact of the ETS linked to the loss of export sales. 6 The cement production occurs in the grinding mills where clinker, gypsum and other additions are reduced to particle size. Some players in the market simply grind the clinker produced elsewhere. 2

Considering a CO 2 price of 25/t price, the study assesses four scenarios, based on the number of free allowances allocated in 2020, for the EU integrated cement industry and the related impact on the EU in terms of production, employment and value added losses and the increase in global CO 2 emissions (Figure 2). Overall, ~240 Mt of clinker production will be at stake. This number includes ~190 Mt of production based on 2005 emission levels and ~50 Mt of production increase driven by the demand expected for 2020. The first scenario is based on full auctioning (as stated in the current draft of the Directive). If this happens, more than 80% of the expected production, equivalent to ~210 Mt of clinker, will be at risk of carbon leakage in 2020 7. This will imply a loss of ~35,000 direct jobs (~87% of expected employment in 2020), and ~ 3,600M value added (~87% of expected value added in 2020). It will also increase global CO 2 emissions between 7 and 38 Mt, due to imports from Turkey and the Middle East, respectively. The second scenario considers a 21% reduction of permits and 100% free allocation. If the 21% reduction is also applied to the cement sector, this scenario represents the exception that the proposal of Directive suggests for the sectors where there is relevant risk of carbon leakage. In this case, 86 Mt of clinker production will be offshored 8 and approximately one third of the integrated cement industry will be affected. The third scenario uses an allocation of a number of CO 2 emission allowances equivalent to the 2005 emission levels. In this scenario, the entire foreseen increase in clinker demand until 2020 will be completely covered by imports. Not satisfying this demand increase through EU production of clinker would imply an opportunity loss in terms of new jobs (10,000 FTE 9 s or ~25% of employment expected in 2020) and value added ( 950M or ~25% of the value added expected in 2020). The fourth scenario is based on 205 Mt of free CO 2 allowances. It would make it competitive to produce the same amount of clinker as in 2005 and cover the expected growth in EU demand. 7 2020 imports will account for production offshoring and 9 Mt of clinker (2005 imports level) that we assume not related to carbon leakage. 8 See previous footnote. 9 Full time equivalent 3

Figure 2 Scenario Total auctioning for 2020 Applying 21% reduction (no auctioning) Keeping '05 clinker production level Covering EU clinker demand CO 2 free allowance allocation (Mt) 0 131 160 205 EU clinker production (Mt) 32 156 189 242 Clinker imports to EU (Mt) 219 (210+9) 95 (86+9) 62 (53+9) 9 EU employment (direct FTEs) 5,500 25,000 30,000 40,500 Gross value added (M ) 530 2,700 3,200 4,200 Global CO2 emissions increase (Mt) 7-38 3-15 2-12 - Carbon leakage impact > 80% of industry offshoring ~1/3 of industry affected Carbon leakage driven by demand growth No additional carbon leakage We believe that maintaining a sustainable integrated cement industry in the EU is possible and will benefit both the environment and the economy. The EU integrated cement industry is a positive contributor to the Sustainable Development Initiative. With net emission factors between 3% and 35% lower than non-ets countries, this industry meets the most demanding environmental standards and provides a waste management solution, as it replaces 18% of traditional fuels in kilns with alternatives, including waste. The EU clinker production is also sustainable from an economic perspective with more than 30,000 people employed and more than 3,200M value added. Additionally, cement will be critical to ensure the fulfilment of adaptation policies which are instrumental in reducing the total cost from sea level rise due to climate change. As a conclusion, there are two scenarios in terms of free allowances for the EU integrated cement industry to avoid significant production offshoring. Free allowances of 205 Mt will make it competitive to produce enough clinker to satisfy both the current demand and the increase expected in the EU (a total of ~240 Mt), while free allowances of 160 Mt will make it attractive to produce the same amount of clinker as in 2005. If no free allowances are allocated, the EU should design alternatives to level the playing field and ensure that no distortions affect the cement industry s competitiveness. 4

AUTHORS Ramón Baeza Senior Partner and Managing Director Baeza.Ramon@bcg.com Iván Martén Senior Partner and Managing Director Marten.Ivan@bcg.com Rafael Rilo Partner and Managing Director Rilo.Rafael@bcg.com Magín Yañez Principal Yanez.Magin@bcg.com Lorenzo Wittum Project Leader Wittum.Lorenzo@bcg.com The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm and the world's leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with clients in all sectors and regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their businesses. Our customized approach combines deep insight into the dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve sustainable competitive advantage, build more capable organizations, and secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with 66 offices in 38 countries. For further information, please visit our Web site at www.bcg.com 5