Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends



Similar documents
Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

Marcellus Fast Facts

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices Page 3

GE Power & Water Water & Process Technologies. Water Treatment Solutions for Unconventional Gas

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

Zero Discharge Water Management for. Horizontal Shale Gas Well Development

Total Water & Wastewater Management for Shale Gas Production. Treatment and Operation Solutions

Underground Injection Wells For Produced Water Disposal

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

David Alleman, ALL Consulting Bill Hochheiser, ALL Consulting. NETL Project Kick-off Meeting January 7, 2010

RPSEA Onshore Program

Natural Gas Supply/Demand - Challenges and Opportunities

IMPACT OF SHALE TECHNOLOGY ON HOUSTON REAL ESTATE

Unconventional Oil and Gas Production Drives Trends in Water Management and Treatment

U.S. Energy Outlook. Oil and Gas Strategies Summit May 21, 2014 New York, NY. By Adam Sieminski, EIA Administrator

FRACTURING FLOWBACK: CONTROLS, ANALYSIS & BENEFITS

Reclamation of Marcellus Shale Drilling Sites in West Virginia by Jeff Skousen and Paul Ziemkiewicz West Virginia University

Unconventional oil and gas: outlook, risks, and potential

Shale gas and tight oil: Framing the opportunities and risks

Oil & Natural Gas Technology

The Ohio Oil & Gas Association Overview of Ohio Oil & Natural Gas. American Association of Energy Engineers April 5, Cleveland, Oh

Well Site Spill Protection: Impacts, Trends and Technologies for Preventing Releases to Water Sources

Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

North American Natural Gas Midstream Infrastructure Through 2035: A Secure Energy Future

INDEPENDENT REPORTS CONFIRM SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR LINC ENERGY S SHALE OIL IN THE ARCKARINGA BASIN

In Fracking s Wake: New Rules are Needed to Protect Our Health and Environment from Contaminated Wastewater

EPRI Global Climate Change Research Seminar. Natural Gas Supply. Francis O Sullivan, Ph.D. May 25 th, 2011

Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources

March 2015 MEGATRENDS IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Northeast Propane Infrastructure, Supply Shortages & High Cost to Consumers

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Natural Gas. Shale Gas Impacts. Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs) Dan Brockett Penn State Extension

GAO OIL AND GAS. Information on Shale Resources, Development, and Environmental and Public Health Risks

Stark State College Oil & Gas Programs Industry Overview. S. Kathleen Steere BS, BSPE Coordinator Oil & Gas Programs

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE NORTHSTAR #1 CLASS II INJECTION WELL AND THE SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO AREA

Global Shale Energy Development: Expanding Economics, Trends, and Implications

To create energy, it takes energy. It takes manpower, experience and an intelligent, smarter way of thinking. That s where we come in.


Tuesday, March 17, 2015 Houston, TX. Energy Exchange 9:20 9:50 a.m. and 9:55 10:25 a.m. OIL AND GAS: ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE IS IT NECESSARY?

Issues & Trends in Natural Gas Supply & Production. June 30, 2011 Washington, DC

Hydraulic Fracturing and Your Health: Water Contamination =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

MYANMAR (BURMA) PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT AND EXPLORATION OPPORTUNITY. 1

The Debrosse Memorial Report 2014 Oil & Gas Activity in Ohio

VII Seminario Estratégico - SPE Evaluación de las Perspectivas Energéticas de la Argentina

GAO UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT. Key Environmental and Public Health Requirements. Report to Congressional Requesters

pennsylvania Mr. Shawn Garvin Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA

Oil and Gas Extraction and Source Water Protection

CBRE CLARION SECURITIES MLPs OIL & GAS DRILLING TECHNOLOGY LEADS TO EFFICIENCY GAINS

Spills and leaks Associated with Shale Gas Development (Updated April 27 th, 2012)

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program

Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: A 2,600 Well Study of Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) 2015 Update

THESIS GIS BASED LOCATION OPTIMIZATION FOR MOBILE PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES IN SHALE GAS OPERATIONS. Submitted by. Amol Hanmant Kitwadkar

A Sustainable Choice for Water Treatment/Recycling When Injection is Not an Option or Water Supply is Limited

MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCED WATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS

DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY TRACKING SYSTEM

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Sustainable Water Management in the Texas Oil and Gas Industry

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

For personal use only

Ion Exchange Softening

AVAILABILITY, ECONOMICS, AND PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF NORTH AMERICAN UNCONVENTIONAL NATURAL GAS SUPPLIES

Hydrofracking in Maryland

Rex Energy Reports Second Quarter 2014 Operational and Financial Results

Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction

The Growth of U.S. Natural Gas: An Uncertain Outlook for U.S. and World Supply

Fossil Fuels are SO last century! THE CASE FOR GREEN ENERGY!

Produced water from oil and gas production

Our Environmental Protection Plan RECYCLING CAPABILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

ROSS Technology Removal of Oil, Solids and Scale Formers

EMPIRE ENERGY GROUP ACHIEVING SIGNIFICANCE IN THE OIL & GAS INDUSTRY

TALISMAN ENERGY INC. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL TO REVIEW 2009 THIRD QUARTER RESULTS

EDGAR Submission Header Summary

ESP FLOWSHEET SIMULATION APPLICATION BRIEF Downhole Oil/Water Separation

Chapter 1 Introduction

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Tight Oil: Lessons Learned from Pilot Tests in the Bakken

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: What to Expect, How to Mediate using FracTracker

And Then There Was Abundance: Examining Natural Gas in Bruce McDowell Director, Policy Analysis American Gas Association

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

Focus on Geopolitics N.A. Shale & Export Options - A Canadian View

WHITEPAPER MAROS. Optimising logistics operations for Water disposal SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

NATIONAL FUEL REPORTS 2015 EARNINGS

Geothermal. . To reduce the CO 2 emissions a lot of effort is put in the development of large scale application of sustainable energy.

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION DECEMBER 31, 2015 NET PROVED RESERVE RECONCILIATION (Unaudited) Gas Equivalent BCFE

US Ethane and Ethylene Exports & Markets Report

SMALL PRODUCER OPERATING ISSUES/CONCERNS ROBERT D. (BOB) KIKER PERMIAN BASIN PROGRAM DIRECTOR PETROLEUM TECHOLGY TRANSFER COUNCIL TEXAS REGION

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

Oil and Gas U.S. Industry Outlook

Analysis of Ohio Severance Tax Provisions of H.B. 487

Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity

How To Water System

Shale Development in Ohio: Utica and Marcellus, Liquid Hydrocarbons and Gas

Questions from Water Celebration Day

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Green Energy Oilfield Services, LLC

GC/MS Considerations for Fracking Gases and Water. Dr. Harold McNair Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA.

The Role of Natural Gas in Texas and America CEA Meeting August 24 th, 2010

HESS CORPORATION. Lean Leads the Way in a Low-Cost Environment

Transcription:

Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends Dave Yoxtheimer, PG Hydrogeologist Penn State Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research GWPC Annual Forum Seattle, WA October 8, 2014

U.S. Natural Gas Production Source: EIA (2014)

Source: EIA (2014) U.S. Oil Production

Shale Energy Water Use Typically use about 1 million gallons (24 MBBLs) per 1,000 feet of lateral Return of flowback ranges from approximately 5-50% Produced fluids range from 5-10 BBLs for every 1 MMCF of gas or 1 BBL of oil produced Water sources in Appalachian Basin are primarily surface water (80%)whereas ground water is the primary source in Western US plays

Shale Energy Water Cycle Source: EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Workplan

Marcellus Produced Fluid Quality 300000 Average Flowback TDS Concentration and Discharge Rate vs. Time 250000 200000 150000 TDS (mg/l) Flow rate (gpd) 100000 50000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Days Since Hydraulic Fracturing Completed

Produced Fluid Management Options Produced fluid management options Direct reuse (blending) On-site treatment w/reuse Off-site treatment w/reuse UIC well disposal Treatment technologies include Filter socks Chemical precipitation Electrocoagulation Evaporation (MVR) Filtration Costs of <$2 to $10+/BBL Most major shale plays recycle 10-50% of produced fluids and use disposal wells for the balance in PA during 2013 ~87% of shale gas flowback and produced water was recycled and ~13% disposed (mainly via injection wells) at cost of $15-20/BBL

Presence of Class II Wells in US ~151,000 Class II UIC wells in US 80% are Class II-R wells for enhanced recovery 20% are Class II-D wells for disposal Inject about 2 billion gpd into Class II wells

Summary of PA Shale Production in 1H 2014 5388 producing wells 1.94 TCF of gas produced 15.6 MMBBLs of brine produced 8 BBLs brine produced per MMCF gas

2014 PA Unconventional Energy Wastewater Figures 15.6 million barrels (MMBBLs) of flowback and produced water generated in PA in 1H 2014 5 MM BBLs of flowback (fluids returning after fracturing and before production) 10.6 MM BBLs of produced water (fluids generated during production) Generate ~8 BBLs of fluids for every 1 million cubic feet of gas produced 89% recycling rate for hydraulic fracturing 78% of fluids stay in the field for recycling 22% of fluids recycled via centralized treatment facilities 10% disposal rate via UIC wells

Brine Disposal In Pennsylvania Bear Lake Wells -8 operating Class IID UIC wells in PA w/ 3 permits pending with only 2 commercial wells -150,660 BPM of total capacity with 60,000 BPM commercial -75,000 BPM of additional capacity with issued permits -Most wells targeting deeper sandstones (Oriskany, Medina, Whirlpool Fms), carbonates or shallower sandstones often via depleted gas wells -Total 1H 2014 unconventional brine injection in PA UIC wells was 74,046 BBLs (408 BPD) Source: Skoff and Billman (2013) -PA shale brine disposal locations -94% injected into 42 OH wells -5% injected into 2 PA wells -1% injected into 3 WV wells

UIC Wellfield Capacity Example Bear Lake Properties Depleted Medina gas well field Over 11,000 acres 2 Commercial UIC Well permits 30,000 bbl/mo/well Approx. 20 wells could potentially be converted to injection Est. 300 million BBLs capacity within the potential injection field Could represent decades of disposal capacity for PA Source: Skoff and Billman (2013)

Utica-Pt. Pleasant Production in OH Summary of OH Shale Production in 1H 2014 503 producing wells 4.42 MMBBLs oil 156 BCF of gas produced 2.52 MMBBLs of brine produced 13.8 BBLs of brine/mmcf of gas

Class II-D UIC Wells in Ohio 240 permitted with 200 operational Class IID wells in OH Injected ~16.3 MMBBLs in 2013, Project ~20 MMBBLs in 2014 51% of injected fluids from out of district Average injection rate of ~415 BPD/well Estimated <25% recycling rate of flowback and produced fluids

Bakken and Three Forks Production Source: Bakken and Three Forks Assessment, USGS (2013)

Disposal Wells In ND Approx imately 470 brine disposal wells in ND In 2013 468,000 BPD of brine was injected into the Dakota Formation. Average well capacity of ~1,000 BPD

Eagle Ford Shale -Typical well use about 6 million gallons -Flowback and produced fluid reuse at about 30% -Seeing increase in reuse with severe drought -Approximately 7,500 Class IID disposal wells in TX -Ellenberger Formation is common injection zone with very high capacity

Niobrara Production in CO Approximately 350 Class IID wells in CO 51 percent of produced fluids are disposed via UIC wells

Projected Increase in Marcellus Produced Fluids Disposal via UIC Wells

Conclusions Every 1 MMCF shale gas or BBL of shale oil generates approximately 5-10 BBLs of produced fluids Ratio tends to decrease as production numbers increase Range of recycling varies from approximately 10-90% in different shale plays Availability of UIC wells and associated disposal costs seems to dictate rate of recycling (more wells=more disposal) Future projections of US shale energy related brine disposal could vary by 8-fold depending on recycling rates (ranging from 20 MMBBLs-160 MMBBLs) Some regions experiencing large scale shale energy development may require significant numbers of new UIC wells (ie Marcellus) to keep pace with disposal trends

Questions?? Thank you!! David Yoxtheimer, P.G. Extension Associate PSU MCOR 320 EES Building University Park, PA 16802 814-865-1587 (office) day122@psu.edu www.marcellus.psu.edu