Effectiveness of Protective Equipment for the Prevention of Sports-Related Concussions in Youth

Similar documents
IS HEAD INJURY CAUSED BY LINEAR OR ANGULAR ACCELERATION?

Safety of artificial turf and natural grass sports surfaces

Understanding brain injury mechanism: integrating real world lesions, ATD response and finite element modeling

2 BIOMECHANICS OF CLOSED HEAD INJURY

A Proposed New Biomechanical Head Injury Assessment Function - The Maximum Power Index

How To Compare Head Injury Risk From A Front Crash Test To Head Injury From A Head Injury

Head injury prediction tool for protective systems optimisation

A Proposed Injury Threshold for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Biomechanics of the Neck in Rear Impacts for improved Seat Design

HEAD INJURY AND EFFECTIVE MOTORCYCLE HELMETS. Tom Whyte Tom Gibson Human Impact Engineering, Australia. Bruce Milthorpe UTS, Australia

Bicycle Helmet Efficacy Using Hybrid III and Magnesium Headforms

Helmet Protection against Traumatic Brain Injury: A Physics Perspective

CORRELATION OF VEHICLE AND ROADSIDE CRASH TEST INJURY CRITERIA

Use of Age, Height and Weight to Predict Injury in Pediatric Advanced Automatic Crash Notification

INJURY BIOMECHANICS IN VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

ABSTRACT INJURY CRITERION TO ASSESS WHIPLASH INJURY IN FMVSS NO. 202 DYNAMIC TEST OPTION

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Impact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision

Long-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions

Biomechanical Factors to Consider for Optimum Helmet Efficiency

Mechanisms of head and neck injuries sustained by helmeted motorcyclists in NSW, Australia.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems - II

Concussion Rates per Sport

Traumatic Brain Injury in Young Athletes. Andrea Halliday, M.D. Oregon Neurosurgery Specialists

Development of numerical models for the investigation of motorcyclists accidents

Importance of the Bicycle Helmet Design and Material for the Outcome in Bicycle Accidents

Ambulance Re-design to Reduce EMS Injuries: Influencing Design through Standards Development. Paul H. Moore, NIOSH Division of Safety Research

Protective Equipment and the Prevention of Concussion V What Is the Evidence?

LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016

Helmets and Mouth Guards: The Role of Personal Equipment in Preventing Sport- Related Concussions

Q dummy family. Fahrzeugsicherheit Berlin e.v. Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics)

Head Injury in Children

A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF ENERGY ABSORBING FOAMS FOR HEAD INJURY PREVENTION

PEDESTRIAN HEAD IMPACT ANALYSIS

Euro NCAP Whiplash Rating - Toyota Position & Proposal. May 2011

COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS

Frontal Impact Analysis of Human Skull for Accident Reconstruction

Assessing the Female Neck Injury Risk

An Article Critique - Helmet Use and Associated Spinal Fractures in Motorcycle Crash Victims. Ashley Roberts. University of Cincinnati

CONCUSSION AND HEAD PROTECTION IN LACROSSE Taking Care of America s Fastest Growing Sport

INVESTIGATION OF LOWER SPINE COMPRESSION FRACTURES IN FRONTAL CRASHES

Investigation of head and neck injury risk associated with short-distance falls in 12 month old children.

Comparisons EBB 11/12/02 Snell M2000, DOT, BSI Type A and EN 22/05

Working Paper. Extended Validation of the Finite Element Model for the 2010 Toyota Yaris Passenger Sedan

Highway Loss Data Institute Bulletin

Helmet Performance and Design

Reanalysis of primate head impact experiments to clarify mild traumatic brain injury kinematics and thresholds

Concussion (Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) and the Team Physician: A Consensus Statement *

Get a Heads Up on Concussion in Sports Policies

Rear Impact Dummy Biofidelity

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

National Football League Head, Neck and Spine Committee s Protocols Regarding Return to Participation Following Concussion

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

Classification of Crash Pattern Based on Vehicle Acceleration and Prediction Algorithm for Occupant Injury

HEAD INJURIES Table 1

What is a concussion? What are the symptoms of a concussion? What happens to the brain during a concussion?

A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

The effects of Michigan s weakened motorcycle helmet use law on insurance losses

POLICY TO ADDRESS SUSPECTED SPORTS RELATED HEAD INJURY/CONCUSSION

Characteristics of Motorcycle Crashes in the U.S.

A METHOD TO ESTIMATE INJURY MEDICAL COST OF OCCUPANTS IN A CRASH TEST

A COMPARISON STUDY ON VEHICLE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INJURIES OF VULNERABLE ROAD USERS IN CHINA AND GERMANY

Objectives. Definition. Epidemiology. The journey of an athlete

REI. RICHARD LYNN STALNAKER, Ph.D. CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION. B.S. Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, 1964 Morgantown, West Virginia

Concussion in Children Lecture Summary Sports Medicine Australia

Minor Vehicle Collision and Injury Analysis. André M. Loyd, Ph.D. Biomechanical Engineer

Consideration on ACL/PCL Failure Evaluation

HEADS UP ONCUSSION IN HIGH SCHOOL SPORTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION

A NEW TEST METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NECK INJURIES IN REAR-END COLLISIONS

FIRST RESULTS FROM THE JAMA HUMAN BODY MODEL PROJECT

Side Impact Causes Multiplanar Cervical Spine Injuries

Thoracic Injury Criterion for Frontal Crash Applicable to All Restraint Systems

TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY LIABILITY:

A multi-body head and neck model for low speed rear impact analysis

The efficacy of bicycle helmets against brain injury

Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System

Development and validation of a bicycle helmet: Assessment of head injury risk under standard impact conditions

EFFECT OF VEHICLE DESIGN ON HEAD INJURY SEVERITY AND THROW DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN BICYCLE CRASHES

Biomechanics I (Head / Neck)

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

Impeaching the Spine Injury Medical Expert. Ernest P. Chiodo, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., M.S., M.B.A., C.I.H. Physician-Attorney-Biomedical Engineer

Summary Report: Requirements and Assessment of Low-Speed Rear Impact Whiplash Dummies

Types of Brain Injury

SAE / Government Meeting. Washington, D.C. May 2005

FE SIMULATIONS OF MOTORCYCLE CAR FRONTAL CRASHES, VALIDATION AND OBSERVATIONS

Biomechanical Assessment of Cycling Helmets: the Influence of Headform and Impact Velocity. based on Bicycle Collisions associated with Injury.

Concussion: Sideline Assessment

Motorcycle accident reconstruction in VL Motion

40,46 16,22 16,25. no fx thoracic sp. Fx lumbar spine. no fx lumbar. spine

Rainy River District School Board SECTION 4

Revised Bethel Park s Sports Concussion and Closed Head Injury Protocol and Procedures for Student-Athletes

Coaches Course Syllabus HB 2038 ~ Natasha s Law

THORACIC INJURY CHARACTERISTICS OF ELDERLY DRIVERS IN REAL WORLD CAR ACCIDENTS

League of Denial Video guide and questions I

Review epidemiology of knee pain. Discuss etiology and the biomechanics of knee pain utilizing current literature/evidence

Transcription:

Effectiveness of Protective Equipment for the Prevention of Sports-Related Concussions in Youth Stefan M. Duma, Steven Rowson, Joel Stitzel, Ray Daniel, Bryan Cobb, Tyler Young, Brock Strom, Craig McNally, Anna MacAlister, Gunnar Brolinson, Mike Goforth, Mark Rogers, John Shifflett, Alex Powers, Chris Whitlow, Jill Urban, Joseph Maldjian, Elizabeth Davenport Presented to the Institute of Medicine Committee Sport-Related Concussions in Youth February 25, 2013 - Washington DC

VT WFU Brain Injury Research Team Virginia Tech Duma Rowson Daniel Cobb VT-VCOM / Sports Med MacAlister Young Strom McNally Brolinson Goforth Rogers Shifflett Wake Forest Stitzel Powers Whitlow Maldjian Urban Davenport

Financial Disclaimer No financial interest in SIMBEX, HITS, or any other helmet related sensor or product No financial interest in Riddell, or any helmet manufacturer No helmet expert witness consulting Speaking fees donated to buy new helmets for youth teams in south-west Virginia.

Funding Sources National Institutes of Health National Inst. Of Child Health & Human Development, R01HD048638 Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Department of Defense US Medical Research and Material Command Toyota Motor Corporation Toyota Central Research and Development Labs

Presentation Outline Part 1: Injury Biomechanics Background Reducing injuries in auto-safety by reducing risk Part 2: Three Fundamental Questions: Is head acceleration correlated to concussion risk? Do helmets differ in their ability to reduce head acceleration? Are there clinical data demonstrating differences in the ability of helmets to reduce concussion risk? Part 3: Youth Football Study Preliminary Data

Automobile Analogy

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are pass / fail FMVSS 208 Frontal Impact FMVSS 214 Side Impact Fixed Barrier 30 mph 33.5 mph 20 mph MDB

New Car Assessment Program(NCAP) NHTSA rates safety on 5 star scale 20 mph Fixed Barrier 35 mph Injury risk to the head, neck, chest, and femur frontal and side tests (rollover is ratio calculation) 38.5 mph Total Risk = 1 (1 Risk head )*(1 Risk neck ) *(1 Risk chest )*(1 Risk femur ) Overall risk = 5/12 * frontal + 4/12 * side + 3/12 * rollover

New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) NHTSA rates safety on 5 star scale Injury risk to the head, neck, chest, and Fixed Barrier femur are considered for frontal and side A star rating is assigned based the overall tests (rollover is ratio calculation) 20 mph risk of serious injury from all tests combined 35 mph A total injury risk for each testing configuration is computed Stars 5 4 3 Each 2 overall injury risk 1 is weighted based on exposure and summed to compute overall risk 0% 10% 15% 20% 40% 100% Overall Risk 38.5 mph Total Risk = 1 (1 Risk head )*(1 Risk neck ) *(1 Risk chest )*(1 Risk femur ) Overall risk = 5/12 * frontal + 4/12 * side + 3/12 * rollover

~1968 FMVSS 208 (pass/fail) ~1978 NCAP frontal (stars) 44,525 ~1997 NCAP side 33,808

We do not know 100% about everything, but know enough to make safety advances Active Research in all Current and Future Body Regions Head injury (HIC) Neck injury (Nij) Chest compression Abdomen Femur loads Pelvis Tibia Ankle complex

We do not know 100% about everything, but know enough to make safety advances Active Research in all Current and Future Body Regions Head injury (HIC) Neck injury (Nij) Accelerations Loads Injury Risk Chest compression Abdomen Femur loads Pelvis Tibia Ankle complex

Concussion Incidence Minimization Rule Changes 3 Strategies: Reduce exposure to head impact Rule changes Proper technique Most Effective Better Equipment Proper Technique + Reduce concussion risk for remaining head impacts Improve helmet design Fewest Concussions

Part 2: Three Fundamental Questions:

Age Definitions Generalized Football Values: League Rules May Vary Age 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 5 IOM Youth Definition 21 Helmet Type: Youth Football 13 14 Adult Football Level of Play: 6 10 11 13 14 18 Elementary School Football Middle School Football High School Football 19 College Football 21 NFL 23

Is head acceleration correlated with concussion risk?

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure

Risk of Skull Fracture Risk of AIS 4 Brain Injury Cadaver Data Mertz Scaling Data 99.9 99.5 99 98 95 90 Risk of Skull Fracture Risk of AIS 4 Brain Injury 99.9 99.5 99 98 95 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 20 HIC 15 =1000 = 16% HIC 15 =1000 = 17% HIC 15 = 700 = 5% 10 5 2 1 0.5 HIC 15 = 700 = 4% 0.1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 15ms HIC 0.1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 15ms HIC (Mertz, 1997)

Cadaver Data Hardy: In Situ Brain Strain Football helmet impacts Linear and Rotational Accelerations Neutral Density Targets As accelerations increase, brain pressure and motion increase 5 mm Hardy et al (2007)

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase

Animal Data Summary of Six Sets of Primate Tests 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch Rotation alone could not cause concussion, needed impact 1980 Ono JARI Human Tolerance Curve Skull fracture and concussion curves 1971 Ommaya, Hirsch Rotation accounts for ½ of brain injury, linear accounts for the other half 1971 Gennarelli, Ommaya, Thibault linear and rotational acceleration relating to concussion 1972 Gennarelli, Thibault, Ommaya Rotation related to diffuse brain injury 1981 Gennarelli Directional dependence of brain injury 1982 Gennarelli, Thibault DAI and coma 1982 Gennarelli, Thibault Sub-dural hematoma 1985 Thibault, Gennarelli Rotation and diffuse brain injury 1971 Unterharnscheidt Both linear and rotational acceleration are important for brain injury 1983 Hodgson Higher linear and rotational acceleration associated with increase brain injury

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase

Rotational Velocity (rad/s) (Ommaya, 1985) Animal Data Ommaya: Tolerance to Concussion Scaled from Primates 10,000 100 Pulse Duration Time in ms 50 20 10 5 1 1,000 Rhesus Monkey 100 Chimpanzee Man 10 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 4500 Rotational Acceleration (rad/s 2 )

Rotational Acceleration (rad/s 2 ) Animal Data Gennarelli: Rotational Acceleration and Concussion 60 60 60 20000 18000 16000 14000 Pure Sagittal Pure Lateral 30 Oblique 14500 16500 12000 12000 10000 8000 8000 6000 4500 4000 3000 2000 0 0 None Mild Concussion Classical Concussion Severe Concussion Mild DAI Moderate DAI Severe DAI (Gennarelli, 1985; Gennarelli, 2003)

Animal Data Rotational Acceleration Comparison Concussion DAI NFL Volunteer DAI

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI As linear and rotational accelerations increase, brain injury in primates increases

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI As linear and rotational accelerations increase, brain injury in primates increases Mid-90s to present: extensive research utilizing dummy reconstructions and other evaluations 2003: Pellman, Viano HIII reconstructions 2003: King, analysis of tests with model

Injury Probability Injury Probability NFL Data (King, 2003) King: Linear and Rotational Acceleration 53 NFL Cases: 22 injury and 31 Non-injury 1 0.9 0.8 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 P < 0.0001 0.5 0.4 0.3 P < 0.0001 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Linear Acceleration (m/s 2 ) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Angular Acceleration (rad/s 2 )

Concussion Injury Risk Concussion Injury Risk NFL Data Pellman: Linear and Rotational Acceleration 58 NFL Cases: 25 injury and 33 Non-injury 1 0.9 0.8 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 P = 0.0001 0.5 0.4 P = 0.0001 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Linear Acceleration (g) 0 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 Rotational Acceleration (rad/s 2 ) 100 200 300 400 500 Severity Index SI 600 700 (Pellman, 2003)

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI As linear and rotational accelerations increase, brain injury in primates increases Mid-90s to present: extensive research utilizing dummy reconstructions and other evaluations 2003: Pellman, Viano HIII reconstructions 2003: King, analysis of tests with model Linear and rotational accelerations are significantly correlated to concussion risk

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI Mid-90s to present: extensive research utilizing dummy reconstructions and other evaluations 2003: Pellman, Viano HIII reconstructions 2003: King, analysis of tests with model 2003 Present, instrumented high school and college football players As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase As linear and rotational accelerations increase, brain injury in primates increases Linear and rotational accelerations are significantly correlated to concussion risk

Helmet Instrumentation Two parallel systems during past 10 years HIT System 6DOF Device (VT) Volunteer Data 6 Accelerometers mounted normal to the skull 3 Linear and Resultant Rotational Accelerations ~$1,000/helmet Validated by NFL, others 12 Accelerometers mounted tangential 3 Linear and 3 Rotational Accelerations (6DOF) ~$10,000/helmet Validates HIT System

Teams Using the HIT System Total Number of Impacts Collected at Virginia Tech Cumulative HITS Data Collection 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Virginia Tech 195,000+ impacts recorded at Virginia Tech 2,000,000+ impacts recorded at all institutions Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Volunteer Data Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth Arizona State Arizona State Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Illinois Minnesota Wake Forest Wake Forest 1 High School 5 High Schools 5 High Schools 2 High Schools 3 High Schools 4 High Schools 4 High Schools 4 High Schools 4 High Schools 1 Youth Team 5 Youth Teams

True Positive Rate True Positive Rate Rotational Acceleration (rad/s/s) True Positive Rate True Positive Rate 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Combined Linear and Rotational Risk Risk Contours 1% 50% 25% 10% 5% 75% 90% 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 ROC Curves 0 0 0.5 0.5 1 False False Positive Positive Rate Rate 1 Volunteer Data AUC = 0.982 HITS Data 63,011 Impacts 244 Concussions 0 0 50 100 150 200 Linear Acceleration (g) (Rowson and Duma, ABME, 2013) 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 AUC = 0.892 NFL Data 58 Impacts 25 Concussions 0 0 0.5 0.5 1 False False Positive Positive Rate Rate

Linear Acceleration Comparison NFL Data 25 Concussions 98 +/- 27 g Volunteer Data 105 Concussions 105 +/- 27 g Two very different methodologies, resulting concussion values nearly identical Strong evidence in determination of accelerations involving concussions (Pellman, 2003; Broglio, 2010; Guskiewicz 2007, 2011; Mihalik, 2007; Rowson, 2011)

Rotational Acceleration Comparison Concussion DAI NFL Volunteer DAI

Experimental Concussion Research Cadaver Data Animal Data NFL Data Volunteer Data 1954 Ford funds WSU 1961 Gurdjian, Lissner origin of WSTC Over 200 Primate tests performed in six sets from 1966 1983 1966 Gadd: GSI or SI (General Motors) 1971 Versace: HIC (Ford) 1997 Mertz: scaling 2007 Hardy: brain strain and pressure As linear acceleration increases, risk of injury increases. 1966 Ommaya, Hirsch first primate tests More recent analysis: 1985 Ommaya:4500r/s2 concussion 1992 Margulies,Thibault DAI at 16,000 r/s2 1998 Arbogast, and Margulies: properties 2003 Gennarelli: concussion values 2009 Davidsson: DAI Mid-90s to present: extensive research utilizing dummy reconstructions and other evaluations 2003: Pellman, Viano HIII reconstructions 2003: King, analysis of tests with model 2003 Present, instrumented high school and college football players As linear and rotational acceleration increase, brain pressure and motion increase As linear and rotational accelerations increase, brain injury in primates increases Linear and rotational accelerations are significantly correlated to concussion risk Linear and rotational accelerations are significantly correlated to concussion risk

Is head acceleration correlated with concussion risk? Yes, as shown by the evidence.

Concussions and Head Impact NFL Data 25 Concussions 100% from head impact Volunteer Data 105 Concussions 100% from head impact Evidence clearly illustrates concussions are caused by head impacts Non-head impact related symptoms are very rare and not the primary problem (Pellman, 2003; Broglio, 2010; Guskiewicz 2007, 2011; Mihalik, 2007; Rowson, 2011)

Do helmets differ in their ability to reduce head acceleration?

NOCSAE Drop Test Linear acceleration only NOCSAE headform Various drop heights Various directions

1 2 1 2 Helmet Comparison: Top Impact from 60 inch Drop Height VS Adams A2000 Riddell 360 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Severity Index NOCSAE Pass / Fail Threshold 1134 416 Adams A2000 Riddell 360 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Peak Acceleration (g) 190 84 Adams A2000 Riddell 360

Linear Impactor Style Test HIII Head and Neck Linear and Rotational Accelerations Various impact speed and directions

NFL Extensive Helmet Testing (Viano, 2006): 10 newer helmets compare against the standard VSR-4 Found 6%- 14% reduction in linear acceleration Found 10% - 23% reduction in rotational acceleration (Viano, 2011a): 2010 helmets compared to those in the 1970s Linear and rotational accelerations dramatically reduced, variation by helmet type (Viano, 2011b): Modern helmet performance 4 of 17 showed significant improvement in reduction of head accelerations

STAR Rating System for Football Helmets STAR: Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk 4 6 STAR E h R a L 1 H 1 Combines true impact exposure with an unbiased risk analysis using real world biomechanical data to assess helmet safety for consumers. (Rowson and Duma, 2011)

STAR Ratings of Current Helmets 5 Stars: Best Available Riddell 360 Rawlings Quantum Plus STAR Value: 0.239 Cost: $374.95 STAR Value: 0.245 Cost: $250.00 3 Stars: Good Rawlings Quantum Riddell Revolution IQ STAR Value: 0.364 Cost: $200.00 STAR Value: 0.369 Cost: $222.99 Riddell Revolution Speed STAR Value: 0.297 Cost: $243.99 Schutt Air XP STAR Value: 0.434 Cost: $179.95 4 Stars: Very Good Schutt ION 4D STAR Value: 0.351 Cost: $259.95 2 Stars: Adequate Xenith X2 STAR Value: 0.477 Cost: $220.00 Schutt DNA Pro + STAR Value: 0.352 Cost: $169.95 Schutt Air Advantage STAR Value: 0.678 Cost: $159.99 Rawlings Impulse Xenith X1 STAR Value: 0.355 Cost: $159.00 STAR Value: 0.356 Cost: $299.99 1 Star: Marginal Riddell VSR4 NR: Not Recommended STAR Value: 0.791 Cost: Not Applicable Used helmets were tested to provide a reference Riddell Revolution STAR Value: 0.362 Cost: $182.99 Adams A2000 Pro Elite STAR Value: 1.700 Cost: $199.95 www.sbes.vt.edu/nid.php

Do helmets differ in their ability to reduce head acceleration? Yes, as shown by the evidence.

Are there clinical data demonstrating differences in the ability of helmets to reduce concussion risk?

Compare Two Popular Helmets Riddell Revolution Riddell VSR4 Acceleration Metrics: NFL: Top group VT: 4 STARs (54% risk reduction) = > < Acceleration Metrics NFL: 2 nd Group VT: 1 STAR (Viano, 2011b; Rowson and Duma, 2011)

Clinical Evidence Part 1 Collins et al. (2006) Studied over 2141 high school players Revolution reduced risk of concussion by 31% Peer reviewed, 5 of 6 comments positive (p = 0.03) Primary criticism from Dr. Cantu s letter Older VSR4 helmets compared to newer Revolution helmets, and that older helmets test worse than newer This is not supported by any evidence: there are no publications or data sets that show older helmets are worse

Clinical Evidence Part 2 Rowson and Duma, 2012a 9 year study of Virginia Tech football players All new helmets Same team physician Controlled for exposure All helmets were instrumented with sensors 153,486 head impacts for 308 players Revolution reduced risk of concussion by 85% (p = 0.03) Eliminates only previous criticisms of the Collins work By accounting for exposure, more accurate comparison of helmet performance

Clinical Evidence Part 3 Current study, to be published in 2013 (Due to IOM copyright, cannot show all details) 13 college teams All instrumented to account for impact exposure All good/new equipment All have very good medical oversight Revolution significantly reduces the risk of concussion compared to the VSR4

Are there clinical data demonstrating differences in the ability of helmets to reduce concussion risk? Yes, as shown by the evidence.

5,000,000 Football Players in US NFL 2,000 Players College 100,000 Players High School 1,300,000 Players 6 to 13 years old 3,500,000 Players 70% of football players are between 6 and 13 years old

Four Youth Publications Pending (Due to IOM copyright, cannot show all details) Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football Part 1: Elementary School Ages 7 to 8 Years and the Effect of Returning Players Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football Part 2: Elementary School Ages 9 to 12 Years and the Effect of Practice Structure Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football Part 3: Middle School Ages 12 to 14 Years Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football Part 4: High School Ages 14 to 18 Years and Cumulative Impact Analysis Submitted, under review, expected to be published in 4 8 weeks.

VT-WFU Youth Study 6 8 Year Olds Auburn Mites 12 Instrumented Players 9 11 Year Olds Blacksburg Juniors 17 Instrumented Players 12 14 Year Olds Blacksburg Middle School 12 Instrumented Players Age 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 11 Year Olds South Fork Jr Pee Wee 22 Instrumented Players 10 12 Year Olds South Fork Pee Wee 21 Instrumented Players 15 18 Year Olds Ronald Wilson Reagan High School 40 Instrumented Players Head Impact Biomechanics Game and Practice Data Collection Cognitive Testing Pediatric ImPACT Testing for 12.5 years old and under Imaging Baseline, Injury, and Post-Season Instrumentation transmitted impact data to computer during play Helmets were instrumented for each game and practice Adult ImPACT Testing for 12.5 year old and over Linear and Rotational Head Acceleration Measurements FE Modeling for Tissue Response Investigating Correlations fmri: MEG:

HIT System Helmet Instrumentation Two parallel systems during past 10 years 6DOF Device (VT) 6 Accelerometers mounted normal to the skull 3 Linear and Resultant Rotational Accelerations ~$1,000/helmet Validated by NFL, others 12 Accelerometers mounted tangential 3 Linear and 3 Rotational Accelerations (6DOF) ~$10,000/helmet Validates HIT System

Child Head Acceleration Measurement Data collected wirelessly for every game and practice

Game Impact: 20g 40g Range

Practice Impact: 50g+ Impact

Pediatric Head Impact Data 6 8 Year Olds Auburn Mites 12 Instrumented Players 9 11 Year Olds Blacksburg Juniors 17 Instrumented Players 12 14 Year Olds Blacksburg Middle School 12 Instrumented Players Age 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 11 Year Olds South Fork Jr Pee Wee 22 Instrumented Players 10 12 Year Olds South Fork Pee Wee 21 Instrumented Players 15 18 Year Olds Ronald Wilson Reagan High School 40 Instrumented Players Players 19 50 10 40 Impacts 50 th 95 th 3,061 11,978 3,414 119 instrumented players under 18 years old 16 g 34,96019 head g impacts recorded 21 g 8 players sustained concussions 37 g 46 g 60 g 16,507 22 g 58 g Injuries 0 4 2 2

Conclusions 1. Injury biomechanics involves reducing risk 2. Head acceleration is correlated to concussion risk 3. Helmets vary in their ability to reduce head acceleration 4. Helmets that reduce head acceleration result in lower risk of concussion on the field 5. Youth head impact exposure can be high, especially in practices Much more biomechanical research is needed relative to youth programs in three key areas: regulations, coaching, equipment

Referenced Work 1. Arbogast, K. B. and S. S. Margulies. Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. J Biomech. 31(9):801-7, 1998. 2. Beckwith, J. G., R. M. Greenwald and J. J. Chu. Measuring head kinematics in football: Correlation between the head impact telemetry system and hybrid iii headform. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):237-48, 2012a. 3. Beckwith, J. G., R. M. Greenwald, J. J. Chu, J. J. Crisco, S. Rowson, S. M. Duma, S. P. Broglio, T. W. McAllister, K. M. Guskiewicz, J. P. Mihalik, S. Anderson, B. Schnebel, P. G. Brolinson and M. W. Collins. Head impact exposure sustained by football players on days of diagnosed concussion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182792ed7, 2012b. 4. Beckwith, J. G., R. M. Greenwald, J. J. Chu, J. J. Crisco, S. Rowson, S. M. Duma, S. P. Broglio, T. W. McAllister, K. M. Guskiewicz, J. P. Mihalik, S. Anderson, B. Schnebel, P. G. Brolinson and M. W. Collins. Timing of concussion diagnosis is related to head impact exposure prior to injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182793067, 2012c. 5. Broglio, S. P., J. J. Sosnoff, S. Shin, X. He, C. Alcaraz and J. Zimmerman. Head impacts during high school football: A biomechanical assessment. J Athl Train. 44(4):342-9, 2009. 6. Broglio, S. P., B. Schnebel, J. J. Sosnoff, S. Shin, X. Fend, X. He and J. Zimmerman. Biomechanical properties of concussions in high school football. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 42(11):2064-71, 2010. 7. Broglio, S. P., E. E. Swartz, J. J. Crisco and R. C. Cantu. In vivo biomechanical measurements of a football player's c6 spine fracture. New England Journal of Medicine. 365(3):279-81, 2011. 8. Broglio, S. P., T. Surma and J. A. Ashton-Miller. High school and collegiate football athlete concussions: A biomechanical review. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):37-46, 2012. 9. Brolinson, P. G., S. Manoogian, D. McNeely, M. Goforth, R. Greenwald and S. Duma. Analysis of linear head accelerations from collegiate football impacts. Curr Sports Med Rep. 5(1):23-8, 2006. 10. Chu, J. J., J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Crisco and R. Greenwald. A novel algorithm to measure linear and rotational head acceleration using single-axis accelerometers. Journal of Biomechanics. 39 supplement 1(S534, 2006. 11. Collins, M., M. R. Lovell, G. L. Iverson, T. Ide and J. Maroon. Examining concussion rates and return to play in high school football players wearing newer helmet technology: A three-year prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery. 58(2):275-86; discussion -86, 2006. 12. Crisco, J. J., J. J. Chu and R. M. Greenwald. An algorithm for estimating acceleration magnitude and impact location using multiple nonorthogonal single-axis accelerometers. J Biomech Eng. 126(6):849-54, 2004. 13. Crisco, J. J., R. Fiore, J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu, P. G. Brolinson, S. Duma, T. W. McAllister, A. C. Duhaime and R. M. Greenwald. Frequency and location of head impact exposures in individual collegiate football players. J Athl Train. 45(6):549-59, 2010. 14. Crisco, J. J., B. J. Wilcox, J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu, A. C. Duhaime, S. Rowson, S. M. Duma, A. C. Maerlender, T. W. McAllister and R. M. Greenwald. Head impact exposure in collegiate football players. J Biomech. 44(15):2673-8, 2011. 15. Crisco, J. J., B. J. Wilcox, J. T. Machan, T. W. McAllister, A. C. Duhaime, S. M. Duma, S. Rowson, J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu and R. M. Greenwald. Magnitude of head impact exposures in individual collegiate football players. J Appl Biomech. 28(2):174-83, 2012. 16. Daniel, R. W., S. Rowson and S. M. Duma. Head impact exposure in youth football. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(4):976-81, 2012. 17. Davidsson, J., M. Angeria and M. G. Risling. Injury threshold for sagittal plane rotational induced diffuse axonal injuries. Proceedings of the International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI). 43-56, 2009. 18. Duma, S. M., S. J. Manoogian, W. R. Bussone, P. G. Brolinson, M. W. Goforth, J. J. Donnenwerth, R. M. Greenwald, J. J. Chu and J. J. Crisco. Analysis of real-time head accelerations in collegiate football players. Clin J Sport Med. 15(1):3-8, 2005. 19. Duma, S. M. and S. Rowson. Every newton hertz: A macro to micro approach to investigating brain injury. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 1(1123-6, 2009.

Referenced Work 20. Duma, S. M. and S. Rowson. Past, present, and future of head injury research. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 39(1):2-3, 2011. 21. Funk, J. R., S. Rowson, R. W. Daniel and S. M. Duma. Validation of concussion risk curves for collegiate football players derived from hits data. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):79-89, 2012. 22. Gadd, C. W. Use of a weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard. Proceedings of the 10th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE 660793(1966. 23. Gennarelli, T., A. Ommaya and L. Thibault. Comparison of translational and rotational head motions in experimental cerebral concussion. Proc. 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference. 797-803, 1971. 24. Gennarelli, T., L. Thibault and A. Ommaya. Pathophysiologic responses to rotational and translational accelerations of the head. SAE Technical Paper Series. SAE 720970, 1972a. 25. Gennarelli, T. A., L. E. Thibault and A. K. Ommaya. Pathophysiologic responses to rotational and translational accelerations of the head. SAE Technical Paper Series. 720970(296-308, 1972b. 26. Gennarelli, T. A., J. H. Adams and D. I. Graham. Acceleration induced head injury in the monkey.i. The model, its mechanical and physiological correlates. Acta Neuropathol Suppl. 7(23-5, 1981. 27. Gennarelli, T. A., L. E. Thibault, J. H. Adams, D. I. Graham, C. J. Thompson and R. P. Marcincin. Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol. 12(6):564-74, 1982a. 28. Gennarelli, T. A. and L. E. Thibault. Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma. 22(8):680, 1982b. 29. Gennarelli, T. A., F. A. Pintar and N. Yoganandan. Biomechanical tolerances for diffuse brain injury and a hypothesis for genotypic variability in response to trauma. Annual Proceedings/Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 47:624, 2003. 30. Greenwald, R. M., J. T. Gwin, J. J. Chu and J. J. Crisco. Head impact severity measures for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury risk exposure. Neurosurgery. 62(4):789-98; discussion 98, 2008. 31. Gurdjian, E., H. Lissner, F. Evans, L. Patrick and W. Hardy. Intracranial pressure and acceleration accompanying head impacts in human cadavers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 113(185, 1961. 32. Guskiewicz, K. M., J. P. Mihalik, V. Shankar, S. W. Marshall, D. H. Crowell, S. M. Oliaro, M. F. Ciocca and D. N. Hooker. Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: Relationship between head impact biomechanics and acute clinical outcome after concussion. Neurosurgery. 61(6):1244-53, 2007. 33. Guskiewicz, K. M. and J. P. Mihalik. Biomechanics of sport concussion: Quest for the elusive injury threshold. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 39(1):4-11, 2011. 34. Hardy, W. N., C. D. Foster, M. J. Mason, K. H. Yang, A. I. King and S. Tashman. Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar x-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 45(337-68, 2001. 35. Hardy, W. N., M. J. Mason, C. D. Foster, C. S. Shah, J. M. Kopacz, K. H. Yang, A. I. King, J. Bishop, M. Bey, W. Anderst and S. Tashman. A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J. 51(17-80, 2007. 36. Hodgson, V., L. Thomas and T. Khalil. The role of impact location in reversible cerebral concussion. Twenty-Seventh Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings (P-134) with International Research Committee on Biokinetics of Impacts (IRCOBI). SAE 831618:225-40, 1983. 37. King, A. I., K. H. Yang, L. Zhang, W. Hardy and D. C. Viano. Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration? Proceedings of the International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI). 2003. 38. Laituri, T. R., S. Henry, K. Sullivan and M. Nutt. Considerations of "combined probability of injury" in the next-generation USA frontal ncap. Traffic Inj Prev. 11(4):371-81, 2010. 39. Margulies, S. S. and L. E. Thibault. A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. J Biomech. 25(8):917-23, 1992.

Referenced Work 40. Mertz, H. J., P. Prasad and A. L. Irwin. Injury risk curves for children and adults in frontal and rear collisions. SAE Technical Paper Series. SAE 973318:13-30, 1997. 41. Mihalik, J. P., D. R. Bell, S. W. Marshall and K. M. Guskiewicz. Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: An investigation of positional and event-type differences. Neurosurgery. 61(6):1229-35; discussion 35, 2007. 42. Mihalik, J. P., K. M. Guskiewicz, S. W. Marshall, J. T. Blackburn, R. C. Cantu and R. M. Greenwald. Head impact biomechanics in youth hockey: Comparisons across playing position, event types, and impact locations. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):141-9, 2012. 43. Ommaya, A. K., A. E. Hirsch, E. S. Flamm and R. H. Mahone. Cerebral concussion in the monkey: An experimental model. Science. 153(732):211-2, 1966a. 44. Ommaya, A. K., A. E. Hirsch and J. L. Martinez. The role of whiplash in cerebral concussion. Proc. 10th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE 660804:314-24, 1966b. 45. Ommaya, A. and A. Hirsch. Tolerances for cerebral concussion from head impact and whiplash in primates. J Biomech. 4(1):13-21, 1971. 46. Ommaya, A. K. Biomechanics of head injuries: Experimental aspects. Biomechanics of trauma. Appleton-Century-Crofts. 1985. 47. Ono, K., A. Kikuchi, M. Nakamura, H. Kobayashi and H. Nadamura. Human head tolerance to sagittal impact reliable estimation deduced from experimental head injury using sub-human primates and human cadaver skulls. Proceedings, 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference. 101-60, 1980. 48. Pellman, E. J., D. C. Viano, A. M. Tucker, I. R. Casson and J. F. Waeckerle. Concussion in professional football: Reconstruction of game impacts and injuries. Neurosurgery. 53(4):799-812; discussion -4, 2003. 49. Rowson, S., G. Brolinson, M. Goforth, D. Dietter and S. M. Duma. Linear and angular head acceleration measurements in collegiate football. J Biomech Eng. 131(6):061016, 2009. 50. Rowson, S., J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu, D. S. Leonard, R. M. Greenwald and S. M. Duma. A six degree of freedom head acceleration measurement device for use in football. J Appl Biomech. 27(1):8-14, 2011. 51. Rowson, S. and S. M. Duma. Development of the star evaluation system for football helmets: Integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(8):2130-40, 2011. 52. Rowson, S. and S. M. Duma. The virginia tech response. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(12):2512-8, 2012a. 53. Rowson, S., S. M. Duma, J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu, R. M. Greenwald, J. J. Crisco, P. G. Brolinson, A. C. Duhaime, T. W. McAllister and A. C. Maerlender. Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: An injury risk function for concussion. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):1-13, 2012b. 54. Rowson, S. and S. M. Duma. Brain injury prediction: Assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0731-0, 2013. 55. Schnebel, B., J. T. Gwin, S. Anderson and R. Gatlin. In vivo study of head impacts in football: A comparison of national collegiate athletic association division i versus high school impacts. Neurosurgery. 60(3):490-5; discussion 5-6, 2007. 56. Thibault, L. E. and T. A. Gennarelli. Biomechanics of diffuse brain injuries. Proc. 29th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE 856022:1985. 57. Unterharnscheidt, F. J. Translational versus rotational acceleration: Animal experiements with measured inputs. Proceedings of the 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE 710880, 1971. 58. Versace, J. A review of the severity index. SAE Technical Paper Series. SAE 710881(1971. 59. Viano, D. C., E. J. Pellman, C. Withnall and N. Shewchenko. Concussion in professional football: Performance of newer helmets in reconstructed game impacts-part 13. Neurosurgery. 59(3):591, 2006. 60. Viano, D. C. and D. Halstead. Change in size and impact performance of football helmets from the 1970s to 2010. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):175-84, 2012a. 61. Viano, D. C., C. Withnall and D. Halstead. Impact performance of modern football helmets. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(1):160-74, 2012b.

Effectiveness of Protective Equipment for the Prevention of Sports-Related Concussions in Youth Stefan M. Duma, Steven Rowson, Joel Stitzel, Ray Daniel, Bryan Cobb, Tyler Young, Brock Strom, Craig McNally, Anna MacAlister, Gunnar Brolinson, Mike Goforth, Mark Rogers, John Shifflett, Alex Powers, Chris Whitlow, Jill Urban, Joseph Maldjian, Elizabeth Davenport Presented to the Institute of Medicine Committee Sport-Related Concussions in Youth February 25, 2013 - Washington DC