How To Manage Alfalfa



Similar documents
Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Site-specific management at Bowles Farming Company. UC Davis Precision Ag Workshop 7/14/2010 Cannon Michael Bowles Farming Company, Inc.

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

Correcting Iron Deficiencies in Soybean with Foliar Iron Fertilizer

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

Irrigation and Nitrogen Management Web- Based Tool for Lettuce Production

Fertilizing hops improves yield and quality by

FERTILIZER GUIDELINES FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS IN MINNESOTA

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Overall Planning for Developing a New Vineyard: Site Selection and Assessment. Ed Hellman Viticulture Extension Specialist

Using Web-based Software for Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in Onion Production: our Research Plan for 2013

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

Chapter D9. Irrigation scheduling

APPENDIX B CHARACTERIZATION OF SOILS AT TEST SITES

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil Nitrogen

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Optimum soil test levels

COTTON WATER RELATIONS

CropManage: Online Irrigation and Nutrient. Web Based Software for Lettuce Production

GROUNDWATER BANKING AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR WATER SECURITY IN CALIFORNIA

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Simplifying Soil Test Interpretations for Turf Professionals

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

SWINE MANURE NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PROJECT

Determining nutrient needs

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Update on Nitrogen Management Field Studies with Strawberries and Leafy Vegetables

IRRIGATION TECH SEMINAR SERIES

SOIL AND IRRIGATION WATER INTERPRETATION MANUAL

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Fertility Management and Calibration Evaluations on Upland and Pima Cotton

Nutrient Stewardship. Reducing the Loss of Crop Nutrients to Waterways

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Lab 7 Soil ph and Salinity OBJECTIVE INTRODUCTION Soil ph active

University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gulf Coast Research and Education Center th Street East Bradenton, FL 34203

WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT

Guidelines for Applying Manure to Cropland and Pasture in Wisconsin

CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY ---- Phase I. Technical Appendix O. Municipal TDS Research

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Drip Irrigation and Fertigation Management of Processing Tomato

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

So far the effort, outlined in the state s Nutrient Reduction Strategy to reduce hypoxia in the Gulf, has been voluntary.

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Remediation of Sodium Contaminated Sites

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

Fertilizer Grade and Calculations. John Peters UW Soil Science Department

Environmental Outcomes of Conservation Agriculture in North Italy

Using Technology and Big Data to Improve Profits. Matt Darr, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

Create Your Own Soil Profile Ac5vity

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

CONDUCTING A COST ANALYSIS

Moving Forward: Agricultural Water Conservation, Productivity, and Water Transfers Workgroup

A case study in cloud computing

Using Dairy Lagoon Nutrients to Produce High Yielding Crops: System Design and Use. Marsha Campbell Mathews 1 ABSTRACT

TABLE OLIVES Manzanillo Variety

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Soil and Leaf Tissue Testing for Commercial Citrus Production 1

NATURAL RESOURCES & NATURAL FEATURES

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

Agro-One Soil Analysis

N-P-K FERTILIZERS. by M.L. Vitosh Extension Specialist, Crop and Soil Sciences

Agricultural Water Conservation and Efficiency Potential in California

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Patrick Brown, Professor. Department of Plant Sciences University of California. Davis, CA

Precision Agriculture. Lucas Rios do Amaral Professor FEAGRI/UNICAMP Agronomist, PhD.

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Weathering, Erosion, and Soils. Weathering and Erosion. Weathering and Erosion

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

The Hydrologic Cycle. precipitation evaporation condensation transpiration infiltration surface runoff transport groundwater water table.

SECTION 3.2 CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION

Land Application of Drilling Fluids: Landowner Considerations

Turfgrass Management of Bermudagrass Football Fields

An Inventory of Oregon's Vineyard Sites and Soils : The First Year of the Oregon Vineyard Soil and Nutrition Initiative

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Average Crop Residue Zone in Manitoba

Remake farming for modern cities

Given the increase in the use of reclaimed

Government of Saskatchewan - Agriculture Market Trends

NCWCD IRRIGATION SCHEDULING PROGRAM - CONVERTING TO A WEB-BASED ACCESSIBLE PROGRAM. James E. Draper 1 ABSTRACT

Quality requirements for wood ash as K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

SECTION 4.11 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

CE394K GIS IN WATER RESOURCES TERM PROJECT REPORT

Soil-Moisture Monitoring

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

BMP 6.7.3: Soil Amendment & Restoration

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CORN, SOYBEANS, WHEAT & ALFALFA FOR. Michigan State University The Ohio State University Purdue University

Transcription:

MANAGING ALFALFA NUTRITION BY SOIL ANALYSIS IN THE DESERT SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES By Aron A. Quist and Michael J. Ottman 1 Introduction: High producing alfalfa responds well to phosphorus and potassium applications in soils deficient in these nutrients. Many soils along the Lower Colorado River flood basin do not have sufficient amounts of these nutrients to maintain high yields. Calcareous high ph soils are known to precipitate phosphate ions to unavailable forms of phosphorus. Therefore, regular applications of phosphorus are recommended to maintain high yields. Palo Verde Valley average yields range from 8 to over 10 tons/acre 4. Normal phosphorus removal rates are 8 lbs P 2 O 5 /ton of quality alfalfa produced 1. Normal rates of phosphorus fertilizer applied range from none to 150 lbs P 2 O 5 /acre per year depending upon soil analysis, book value nutrient management plans, yield potential, and other factors. The Lower Colorado River floodplain soils were formed from sediment re-deposited from the upper watershed (Grand Canyon) 5. Soils contain minerals that contain high amounts of exchangeable potassium: in the form of feldspars, Muscovite and biotite. These minerals are found in abundance in loam and clay soil textures. Potassium is a primary nutrient that has been known to be applied in the Palo Verde Valley. Alfalfa removal rates are 60 lbs K 2 0/ac per ton produced 1. At normal yields, the removal rate is 480 600 lbs K 2 0/ac. Common application rates vary from none to 240 lbs K 2 0/acre per year. Background: In the 1960 s, Garn Stanworth, former owner of Stanworth Crop Consultants, began sending soil and plant samples to Ohio State University for chemical analysis to help growers manage fertilizer applications on local soils 2. In the 1970 s, Stanworth Crop Consultants built the first local lab in the area. Initially, alfalfa nutrient management was performed utilizing the alfalfa mid-stem sampled at 10% bloom and analyzed for soluble PO 4 -P. After several years of conducting nutrient management programs, it became apparent that although the tissue testing program worked well, analysis needed to be performed prior to each cutting. This intensity of sampling frequency and the importance of the timing of sampling (10% bloom), caused Stanworth Crop Consultants to investigate using soil sampling in lieu of the tissue testing program. The program was successful and after several replicated research projects was in full use by the 1980 s 3. Sampling Protocols: Soils are sampled up to three times per year for phosphorus and potassium. Soil texture is estimated using SP (saturation percentage) analysis 6. Sampling timing is: Fall - September through November; Winter - January through March; and Spring - April through June. Each field is divided into quadrants and soil sampling locations are 1 Aaron Quist, Stanworth Crop Consultants, Blythe, CA (aronq@stanworth.net), M. Ottman, University of Arizona, Tuscon (mottman@ag.arizona.edu): IN Proceedings, 2014 California Alfalfa, Forage, and Grain Symposium, Long Beach, CA, 10-12 December, 2014. UC Cooperative Extension, Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. (See http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu for this and other Alfalfa Symposium Proceedings.)

established. No less than two sample locations are selected and composite soil sampling is discouraged. For field sizes larger than 35 acres, additional sample areas are added for each 17 acre increment. For example, 4 sample locations for a 70 acre field and 8 sample locations for 140 acres. After arriving at the sample location, the fieldman walks 25 steps into the field, then the area is sampled along a transect walking toward the opposite corner of the field 5. Every 10 steps a subsample is taken, a total of 20 subsamples are taken in each location. For phosphorus, a 0-3 inch soil sample depth is taken and for potassium, a 0-12 inch sample is taken. Special attention is paid to the depth as variation in sample depth can significantly bias the eventual test result particularly for phosphorus. The soil is analyzed by the Olsen bicarbonate extraction for both P and K. Database Review: In the 1980 s, Stanworth Crop Consultants created a custom data base program to follow: plant and soil analysis, irrigation data, fertilizer recommendations, fertilizer applications and yields (if available). Recently, we have begun to tap the database for agronomic information. A review of our soil analysis data from alfalfa fields has yielded records of soil analysis from established alfalfa fields totaling 86,618 samples for phosphorus and 47,464 samples for potassium. Preplant soil samples were excluded from the data base and samples only from established fields were selected. Samples were taken based upon Stanworth Crop Consultants protocols with rare exceptions. The database allows allocation of samples from each specific location. Because the areas have been tested for soil texture (saturation percentage), each sample was grouped with other samples of the same soil texture. The critical levels for soil test P were: 1) >15 ppm = above, 2) 12-15 ppm = at, and 3) <12 = below. The critical levels for soil test K were: 1) >80 ppm = above, 2) 60-80 ppm = at, and 3) <60 = below. Soil texture had little or no influence on the percentage of soils testing at or below the critical level for phosphorus (Fig. 1). About 45 to 50% of the soil samples showed a need for additional phosphorus with small differences depending on soil texture. However, for potassium, the percentage of soils testing at or below the critical level was highest for sandy soils, intermediate for loams, and lowest for clays. Over twenty years of data, about 45% of soils from sandy fields required applications of potassium, compared to about 10% of soils from clay fields needing additional potassium (Fig. 2). Long term trends show that samples locations that require additional phosphorus have decreased over the last 20 years from 65% of the areas at or below the critical zone in the early 1990 s to 47% recently at or below the critical zone for phosphorus (Fig. 3). Potassium is showing similar trends with 39% of sample locations being at or below the critical zone in the mid-1990 s to 18% recently of sample locations being at or below the critical zone (Fig. 4). Conclusion: Soil testing has proven itself an excellent long term tool to help manage nutrient applications on alfalfa in the Desert Southwest. Stanworth database confirms that sandy soil texture locations on established alfalfa fields generally require more potassium fertilizer than loam or clay soil texture locations. However, soil texture was not such a clear indication of need

for phosphorus. The number of sample locations that require phosphorus and potassium fertilizer have been decreasing over the last twenty years. Fig. 1. Phosphorus (P) levels above, at, or below the critical zone for clay, loam, and sand soils in samples collected by Stanworth Crop Consultants from 1991 to 2013.

Fig. 2. Potassium (K) levels above, at, or below the critical zone for clay, loam, and sand soils in samples collected by Stanworth Crop Consultants from 1995 to 2013.

Fig. 3. Phosphorus (P) levels above, at, or below the critical zone in samples collected by Stanworth Crop Consultants from 1991 to 2013. The years on the graph represent the midpoint of a 5-year running average.

Fig. 4. Potassium (K) levels above, at, or below the critical zone in samples collected by Stanworth Crop Consultants from 1995 to 2013. The years on the graph represent the midpoint of a 5-year running average.. References 1. Better Crops with Plant food, 56 (1). Copyright 1972 the Potash Institute of North America 2. http://stanworth.net/aboutus.html 3. http://stanworth.net/pdf/dsf-fertilizer-trials.pdf 4. Wallace, J. O. 1996 Agricultural Production Report. Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner Weights and Measures. 1996. 5. Soil Survey of Palo Verde Area, California. 1974. USDA, University of California, Ag Experiment station. U. S Government Office. 1974. 6. Christensen, L.P. and William L. Peacock. 2000. Mineral Nutrition and Fertilization. In: Raisin Production Manual (L.P. Christensen, ed.) Oakland, California : University of California, Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication. Publication 3393. 7. A. Quist, and G. T. Stanworth, Stanworth Crop Consultants, 413 West Hobsonway, Blythe, CA 92225; Published In: Proceedings, 27th California Alfalfa Symposium, 10-11 December, 1997, Visalia CA, UC Cooperative Extension, University of California, Davis.