IMEDS-Evaluation for Conducting Post-Market Safety Studies



Similar documents
Update From the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology

Public Health and the Learning Health Care System Lessons from Two Distributed Networks for Public Health

Overview of FDA s active surveillance programs and epidemiologic studies for vaccines

The FDA s Mini- Sen*nel Program and the Learning Health System

FDA's Mini-Sentinel Program to Evaluate the Safety of Marketed Medical Products. Progress and Direction

STRENGTHENING OUR NATIONAL SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL DEVICE POSTMARKET SURVEILLANCE

PharmaSUG Paper HA07

AMCP Biosimilars Collective Intelligence

Utility of Common Data Models for EHR and Registry Data Integration: Use in Automated Surveillance

Nurses at the Forefront: Care Delivery and Transformation through Health IT

Kaiser Permanente Comments on Health Information Technology, by James A. Ferguson

Toward Meaningful Use of HIT

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ANALYTICS: DEVELOPING A TRUSTED 360 DEGREE VIEW OF THE PATIENT

Secondary Uses of Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research

Appendix 6.2 Data Source Described in Detail Hospital Data Sets

UDI as the Cornerstone to Medical Device Data Capture. Presentation to: 27th Global GS1 Healthcare Conference

Brookings Active Surveillance Implementation Council Meeting #2. Participant Biographies

Mini-Sentinel Distributed Query Tool Summary Table Descriptions

Big Data for Patients (BD4P) Stakeholder Engagement Plan

TransCelerate's Role in Transforming Pharmaceutical Trials Presentation to PCORNet

MINI-SENTINEL COMMON DATA MODEL DATA QUALITY REVIEW AND CHARACTERIZATION PROCESS AND PROGRAMS

The Role of the CRO in Effective Risk-Based Monitoring

Report to Board of Administration

Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability

NASCIO 2014 State IT Recognition Awards

How To Improve Care For A Chronic Pain Patient

Post-Implementation EMR Evaluation for the Beta Ambulatory Care Clinic Proposed Plan Jul 6/2012, Version 2.0

T h e M A RY L A ND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION

Data: The Steel Thread that Connects Performance and Value

Role of EMRs in Patient Registries & Other Post- Marketing Research

Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations

Health Home Performance Enhancement through Novel Reuse of Syndromic Surveillance Data

Electronic health records to study population health: opportunities and challenges

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health REGULATORY SCIENCE PRIORITIES (FY2016)

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Revenue Cycle Executive Roundtable Preparing for ICD-10: Staying the Course

AHRQ S Perspective On Clinical Utility. Gurvaneet Randhawa, MD, MPH Medical Officer, Senior Advisor on Clinical Genomics and Personalized Medicine

Brown University Libraries Technology Plan,

An Online Continuing Education Module to Support Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines

Vermont s EHR Pilot. State Alliance Learning Forum September 25-26, 2008

making a difference where health matters Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network

A Pilot Study of the Incidence of Exposure to Drugs for which Preemptive Pharmacogenomic Testing Is Available

Environmental Health Science. Brian S. Schwartz, MD, MS

New and Innovative Learning Trends in Healthcare

Appropriate Use of Agile in Medical Device Software Development

HEALTH DATA LEADERSHIP SUMMIT

Adverse Event Reporting and Electronic Health Records

Privacy Requirements Definition and Testing in the Healthcare Environment

HIPAA and Big Data Twenty Third National HIPAA Summit. March 17, 2015 Mitchell W. Granberg, Optum Chief Privacy Officer

Commercial Bundle Program for Total Joint Replacements

The Six A s. for Population Health Management. Suzanne Cogan, VP North American Sales, Orion Health

Accountable Care Platform

PALANTIR HEALTH. Maximizing data assets to improve quality, risk, and compliance. 100 Hamilton Ave, Suite 300 Palo Alto, California 94301

How To Write A Workforce Strategy

KNOWLEDGENT WHITE PAPER. Big Data Enabling Better Pharmacovigilance

Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record (VLER) Health Information Exchange in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab

Pragmatic Seamless Design for Efficacy Trial of Asthma Management with reduced Cost. Mei Lu, PhD Christine Joseph, Ph.D

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

EURORDIS-NORD-CORD Joint Declaration of. 10 Key Principles for. Rare Disease Patient Registries

The Product Review Life Cycle A Brief Overview

Analytic-Driven Quality Keys Success in Risk-Based Contracts. Ross Gustafson, Vice President Allina Performance Resources, Health Catalyst

NSW Government ICT Benefits Realisation and Project Management Guidance

All Payer Claims Databases: Options for Consideration Feasibility Study Final Report Presentation to the Alaska Health Care Commission March 7, 2013

Transcription:

IMEDS-Evaluation for Conducting Post-Market Safety Studies Susan Gruber Troy McCall, Greg Daniel *, Nicole Spear Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA * Brookings Institution Big DiP USA, Boston, Massachusetts, September 24, 2015

Innovation in Medical Evidence Development and Surveillance (IMEDS) IMEDS is a program of the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA, a non-profit public-private partnership IMEDS-Evaluation supports FDA s public health vision by providing non-fda study sponsors access to data and tools used by the FDA Sentinel System to proactively monitor and detect drug safety 1

Innovation in Medical Evidence Development and Surveillance (IMEDS) Outline I. Sentinel Overview II. IMEDS Evaluation III. IMEDS-Evaluation Pilot Study IV. Improving the Methodology V. Participating in IMEDS-Evaluation 2

Sentinel Overview Mini-Sen nel Distributed Database* q Popula ons with well-defined person- me for which most medically-a ended events are known q 178 million members** q 358 million person-years of observa on me q 48 million people currently accruing new data q 4 billion dispensings q 4.1 billion unique encounters 42 million acute inpa ent stays q 30 million people with >1 laboratory test result *As of July 2014 ** Double counting exists for individuals who change health plans info@mini-sen nel.org 10 slide courtesy of Richard Platt 3

Sentinel Overview Collaborating Institutions that also act as Data Partners Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research Henry Ford Health System Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation Meters Primary Care Institute Kaiser Permanente Colorado Kaiser Permanente Hawaii Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Kaiser Permanente Northern California Kaiser Permanente Northwest source: http://www.mini-sentinel.org/about_us/collaborators.aspx 4

Sentinel Overview Mini-Sen nel Distributed Analysis 1- User creates and submits query (a computer program) 2- Data partners retrieve query 3- Data partners review and run query against their local data 4- Data partners review results 5- Data partners return results via secure network 6 Results are aggregated info@mini-sen nel.org 19 slide courtesy of Richard Platt 5

IMEDS-Evaluation FDA s original vision for Sentinel includes leveraging the tools and system capabilities for broader public health and safety uses by stakeholders other than FDA IMEDS-Evaluation is working to realize this vision 6

Key Features of IMEDS-Evaluation Supporting the vision of Sentinel as a national resource Consistency in Active Surveillance Re-use of the Sentinel Distributed Data Network Transparency Privacy Collaboration 7

IMEDS-Evaluation Pilot Study Sponsored by Pfizer Phase I: Governance Policies and Procedures drafted in collaboration with Sentinel Data Partners and Sentinel Operations Center at Harvard Pilgrim Revision will be informed by experience, and incorporate industry-wide input 8

IMEDS-Evaluation Pilot Study Phase II: Carry out a study IMEDS Distributed Data Network IMEDS Operations Center IMEDS Data Coordinating Center at Harvard Pilgrim 9

IMEDS-Evaluation Pilot Study FDA Reusable Rapid Query Tools Level I CIDA modular programs Cohort Identification and Descriptive Analysis Tool Type 1: Descriptive statistics Type 2: Crude and minimally adjusted association measures Level II programs provide one-time assessment * Level III programs provide sequential analysis * Protocol-based assessments * *not part of the Pilot, but available when Evaluation is fully operational 10

IMEDS-Methods Program Improve safety surveillance using large databases Address challenges fragmented healthcare system, rare exposures/outcomes, generalizability, data capture Activities Methodologic investigations Development of novel tools and methods Informs IMEDS-Evaluation, Sentinel activities, other studies of administrative data 11

IMEDS-Methods Program Core focus areas (2015 Research Agenda) 1. Addressing bias in estimates from observational studies 2. Better understanding uses and limitations of the data 3. Expanding the surveillance question to continuous Risk/Benefit assessment 4. IMEDS Research Lab supports qualified investigators from industry, government, and academic institutions 12

IMEDS-Methods Program Sample project addressing bias in large scale observational studies Identifying Health Outcomes in Healthcare Databases Clinical, database, methodologic considerations Validation, transportability, best practice Cross-sector effort Stephan Lanes, Kevin Haynes, and Michael Pollack (HealthCore), Alec Walker (WHISCON, IMEDS), Jeff Brown (Harvard Pilgrim) 13

IMEDS-Methods Program Sample projects addressing uses and limitations of the data 1. Extract lessons from OMOP activities for Mini-Sentinel Common Data Model comparison Recreate Mini-sentinel protocol-based findings in the IMEDS Research Laboratory identify any discrepancies evaluate sources of heterogeneity 14

IMEDS-Methods Program Sample projects addressing uses and limitations of the data 2. Understanding characteristics that facilitate and challenge investigations using administrative data Characteristics of exposure, outcome, data capture Unmeasured confounding, misclassification, loss to follow-up, etc. Joint IMEDS / FDA / MS Workgroup 15

IMEDS-Methods Program Translate findings into practice For example, identifying influential characteristics makes it possible to Develop metrics Assess likelihood of success using available data Illuminate barriers Opportunity to refine study design and analysis plan to improve interpretability, reliability 16

IMEDS-Methods Program Translate findings into practice Sensitivity Analysis Investigate alternate risk windows, effects of model misspecification, unmeasured confounding Encourage use of more sophisticated approaches Assess impact of any observed variation on substantive conclusion Working to improve the state of the art 17

Participating in IMEDS-Evaluation Input on draft Policy and Procedures Draft document will be posted on the IMEDS website with request for public feedback after conclusion of the Pilot Email IMEDS@ReaganUdall.org with subject line "Evaluation Program updates, requests for your input Troy McCall, IMEDS Chief Implementation Officer tmccall@reaganudall.org 18

Conclusion IMEDS-Evaluation is working to provide non-fda study sponsors access to same data and tools as Mini-Sentinel IMEDS-Methods is focusing on ways to improve the reliability and interpretability of large scale observational studies Stakeholder participation is vital to success Get involved by emailing IMEDS@ReaganUdall.org with subject line "Evaluation 19