How To Improve Arts Education In Michigan

Similar documents
Arts Abstract : The Chicago Public Schools Arts Education Plan. Bringing the Arts to Every Child in Every School

Report on Arts Education Conference

Arts Education In Utah Public Elementary Schools Executive Summary

SCHOOL Survey Arts Education Programs

Great Public Schools for Every Student. NEA Arts Advocacy. Resource Guide

Arts Education Strategies in California LCAPs

Arts. Education. In Public Elementary and Secondary Schools and

The School Counselor s Role in College and Career Readiness

Accelerating Arts Education Funding Cuts and Loss of Arts Teachers Paint Grim Picture for City Schools

Essential Elements of a Quality Visual and Performing Arts Program

*Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators

Education Systems. Hundreds of companies are doing research here, but they aren t the only ones discovering things.

11/03/15 REVISOR KLL/IL RD4370

Michigan Merit Curriculum High School Graduation Requirements

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

Tennessee Tennessee Arts Commission Kim Leavitt, Director of Arts Education

The Hawai i State Legislature enacted ACT 80 in

Agenda for Reform. Summary Briefing December 14, 2009

The arts music, dance, theatre, and visual art uniquely provide the physical and mental challenges; the experience of selfexpression,

Grantmakers in the Arts. Arts Education Funders Coalition K-12 Education Policy Agenda

2014 Educator Preparation Performance Report Statewide Report

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION Educational Leadership Technology Online

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Oklahoma Oklahoma Arts Council Michael Eddens, Oklahoma Arts Council

Register Your High School for Arizona Poetry Out Loud. Arizona Department of Education Student Artwork Competition. Volume 9, Issue

SPRINGBORO COMMUNITY CITY SCHOOLS

Ventura Unified School District

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

Oh, that explains it. Michigan Merit Curriculum High School Graduation Requirements

The Role of the State Higher Education Board in Teacher Education and Assessment: Initiatives of the Arizona Board of Regents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS MassCore Updated October 16, 2015

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

Art & Music Five Year Plan. Program Review, Research & Recommendations Chris McCullough, Supervisor Fine & Applied Arts June, 2012

Arts Education in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools:

The Any Given Child Fine Arts FAQ

VERMONT ARTS COUNCIL: ARTS EDUCATION ACTION PLAN

Position Statement on English Language Arts Education Connecticut State Board of Education December 3, 2008

ESSA Implementation and Music Education: Opportunities Abound

Los Angeles County leads national trend to restore arts education as Arts for All launches third year for County s 80 school districts

TEACH PLUS AGENDA FOR TEACHER PREPARATION REFORM

High School Career Academies: A 40-Year Proven Model for Improving College and Career Readiness

Mississippi Department of Education Highly Qualified Teacher Criteria The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

How To Implement The New Core Of The New Plan For The State Of Ohio

2013 Educator Preparation Performance Report University of Akron

FAIRFIELD CITY SCHOOLS QUALITY PROFILE

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

MEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES. An NEA-AFT Publication

DRAFT. Denver Plan Every Child Succeeds

NEW UNITS OF INSTRUCTION, PUBLIC SERVICE, AND RESEARCH AT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES

PARTICIPATION IN ARTS EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

Performing & Visual Arts Magnet High School Program

Wyoming Wyoming Arts Council Camellia El-Antably, Arts Education Specialist/Deputy Manager

Assessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall

Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS)

Guidelines for Special Education Teachers Certificated or Teaching at the Secondary Level to Meet the Highly Qualified Requirement

How To Teach Online Courses In Australia

South Carolina State Report Card

Excellence. Education. 3-Year Strategic Plan Version 4.7

REGULATIONS of the BOARD OF REGENTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

SHREWSBURY HIGH SCHOOL

TEACHING THE LAW AND JUSTICE CURRICULUM. lawandjustice.edc.org

Engineering our Future New Jersey: Partnerships, the Critical Element

COLLEGE OF THE ARTS Dr. John Gaston, Dean Radio House, 230 Brookwood Drive

South Carolina School Year End Report Cards For

All Teacher Licensure Tests 74 96%

6. Education. Overview

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

OPERATING STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SERVING GIFTED STUDENTS

Enabling & Supportive Legislation

Colorado High School Graduation Guidelines

Introduction It s been said that while history shapes the hand a state is dealt, public policy

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

100-Day Plan. A Report for the Boston School Committee By Dr. Tommy Chang, Superintendent of Schools. July 15

Colorado s Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness (PWR) High School Diploma Endorsement Criteria

~ Strategic Directions: These are the foundational supports that the District should ensure in order for students to achieve success.

Hello, this TICAL presentation is designed to help administrators and teachers learn more about the. Slide 1

ARTS EDUCATION Creating Student Success In School, Work, and Life February 2015

Northeastern Illinois University Chicago, Illinois

External and Online Credit Options for Manchester Graduation Requirements Policy

Developing Our Youth Through Arts Education. The Arts Make the Difference

ANNUAL ARTS IN SCHOOLS REPORT

21 st Century Learner: Schools for the Future

REPORT CARD THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL SCHOOL

2015 Education Progress Report

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

SPECIAL EDUCATION COORDINATOR POSITION DESCRIPTION

Flexible, Affordable, Inviting. SUCCESS 97% Master s degree completion rate.

Michigan Blueprint of a Quality Arts Education Program

Regulations Governing the Review and Approval of Education Programs in Virginia

Georgia s Technology Literacy Challenge Fund Grant Application. Bremen City Schools. Section 3: Grant Proposal

Music Education Band C50208BM Wind Instrument - Percussion

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

A Community Audit for Arts Education

B.A. in Education Specialization: Early Childhood Education (P-3) Student Handbook

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

New Hampshire Department of Education Special Education Program Approval and Improvement Process

Grand Valley State University School of Social Work

Transcription:

ARTS EDUCATION IN MICHIGAN FOSTERING CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION 2012 RESEARCH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS i

MICHIGAN ARTS EDUCATION SURVEY PARTNERS MICHIGAN YOUTH ARTS PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS WELCOME! On behalf of the Michigan Youth Arts, the Michigan Youth Arts Leadership Roundtable, the Michigan Department of Education, the Michigan Coucil for Arts and Cultural Affairs, and ArtServe Michigan, we would like to thank you for sharing our dedication to the complete education of all children in Michigan. It is this guiding principle that spawned a remarkable, statewide, interorganizational partnership to launch a landmark survey of arts education in Michigan - a gathering of baseline data to lay a framework to address the many challenges in arts education today and build collaborative solutions for the benefit of all Michigan s students. American String Teachers Association Michigan Unit Michigan Dance Council Digital Arts, Film & Television Michigan Educational Theatre Association Interlochen Center for the Arts Michigan Humanities Council Kalamazoo Regional Education Service Agency Education for the Arts Michigan Interscholastic Forensic Association Michigan Art Education Association Michigan Music Educators Association Michigan Council of Teachers of English Michigan Music Teachers Association Michigan Youth Arts works across organizations, artistic disciplines, and educational affiliations to leverage the strength of our combined perspectives and efforts and provide a unified voice for arts education throughout Michigan. We understand that the economic challenges we face in Michigan are a reality we all have to work within. This reality has united us to inform the greater public on the issues facing arts education and the opportunities that lay before us. Michigan School Band & Orchestra Association Michigan School Vocal Music Association VSA Michigan Western Michigan University College of Fine Arts MICHIGAN ARTS EDUCATION SURVEY SPONSORS The findings from this comprehensive survey of schoolbuilding-level data on arts education from across the state inform the recommendations in this report. These recommendations are uttered with one voice, shared by all the partners listed here, and serve as a road map to grow arts education in Michigan and prepare our students to think creatively, to innovate, to work with discipline and attention to craft - to achieve - in the 21 st century. We hope that you will join us as we strive to make high-quality, consistent, equitable, standards-based arts education a reality for all students - re-imagining how Michiganders are prepared for life, post-secondary learning and the workplace. Yours in the arts, 2012 Michigan Youth Arts 301 W 4 th St, Suite 415 Royal Oak, MI 48067 248-545-9200 (t) 248-545-9201 (f) info@michiganyoutharts.org www.michiganyoutharts.org Kim Dabbs Executive Director Michigan Youth Arts 1

MICHIGAN ARTS EDUCATION SURVEY MICHIGAN ARTS EDUCATION SURVEY A LANDMARK STUDY In the fall of 2011, Quadrant Arts Education Research, in partnership with Michigan Youth Arts, the Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs, the Michigan Department of Education, and ArtServe Michigan, began a statewide study of arts education in Michigan schools. The project was designed to create a never-before-available picture of arts education in Michigan and institute baseline information for tracking and measuring future progress. This landmark study provides essential data on student access, teacher training, assessment and accountability in arts education in K-12 schools in Michigan. The data provides the groundwork to drive future arts education policy decisions that effect all Michigan students. The principals of 4163 schools, including 718 private and 293 charter schools, were asked to complete an online survey detailing numerous building-level specifics on arts education in their schools, including: Types of arts courses (curricular and extracurricular) offered, by grade level (for music, visual arts, theater, and dance); Number of students enrolled in arts courses; Number of hours in a year dedicated to arts education, by arts discipline; Certification level of teachers providing arts education; Non-salary budgets allocated to arts education; Professional development offerings to art and general classroom teachers; Policies in place regarding arts education (adoption of standards, high school arts graduation requirements, etc.). A total of 826 schools completed a questionnaire - a 20% response rate. A total of 460,066 students, or 30% the total student population, were represented by responding schools. AREAS OF FOCUS The findings in this report are grouped by key areas that concentrate on separate but interconnected aspects vital to successful arts education. Student Access Equitable access to high-quality, consistent, sequential, standards-based arts education for all students in grades pre-k through 12. The principle of equitable student access implies every K-12 student in Michigan has arts education as part of the core curriculum. Professional Preparation and Development Equitable, consistent, high-quality pre-service and in-service training in arts education for elementary, secondary, and specialist teachers. The principle of consistent professional preparation and development ensures students have access to highly-qualified arts specialists, and that educators receive appropriate training to meet federal and state mandates in arts education. Accountability An authentic, appropriate, and compulsory presence for the visual and performing arts in state and district academic accountability systems. Arts education accountability means that every school has robust arts education courses, the means to evaluate and improve them, and the budget to maintain them. KEY FINDINGS 93% of high schools and 94% of elementary and 92% middle schools provide arts instruction in at least one arts course. 108,000 students attend school each day without arts education. Annual spending for curricular support of arts education averages only $4.39 per pupil in high school and only $1.67 per pupil in elementary school - just 2.5 cents a day in high school and less than a penny a day in elementary school. 33% of schools receive outside dollars to support arts education. Only 11% of elementary schools offer at least one course in theatre; only 6% of middle schools offer at least one course in dance. 12% of high schools do not meet the state graduation requirement of one credit in the arts. 13% of schools do not include the arts equally when calculating students grade point averages. High school students with higher levels of arts education perform better on the ACT and MME state exams across all socioeconomic categories. 45% of schools cited transportation costs as a significant barrier to arts-related field trips. 2 3

STUDENT ACCESS WHAT WE KNOW Most Michigan students have at least some arts classes in their schools - only 6% of elementary schools and 8% of middle and high schools have no arts courses at all. But 20% of all schools offer only one artistic discipline. High schools are the most likely to offer the most disciplines, but only 8% of them offer all four. 12% of Michigan high schools do not offer even the required one credit in the arts needed to graduate under the Michigan Merit Curriculum guidelines. 32% of elementary schools provide less than one hour a week of instruction in the arts. 108,000 students in Michigan attend schools without any arts education courses. 35-40% of schools have no certified arts specialists on staff in music or visual art. 82-96% of schools have no certified arts specialists in dance or theatre. A majority of schools that offer arts courses do have designed and dedicated discipline-specific facilities in which to teach, but 15% of schools don t have appropriate space for music or visual art, and 30-40% of schools don t have appropriate space for dance or theatre. Annual spending for curricular support of arts education averages only $4.39 per pupil in high school and only $1.67 per pupil in elementary school - just 2.5 cents a day in high school and less than a penny a day in elementary school. 39% of schools reported using outside funding sources to support arts instruction. 92% of schools have no arts coordinator. 45% of schools cited the cost of transportation as a major barrier to arts-related field trips. 108,000 students in Michigan attend schools without any arts education courses. Percent of schools offering at least one arts course Percent of schools with a certified arts specialist as the primary instructor RECOMMENDATIONS Provide Access for All Students and the Michigan State Board of Education, in partnership with other statewide organizations, implement strategies to reduce the number of students without access to arts education from over 100,000 to zero. Identify Schools in Need and the Michigan State Board of Education identify schools where arts instruction is unavailable or very limited and support policies and resources that restore arts education in those schools. Develop Arts Education Funding Standards develop a recommended level of funding to support arts instruction in public schools. Provide Access to All Arts Disciplines We recommend schools provide access to courses in music, dance, theatre and visual art. Employ Arts Coordinators We recommend all districts employ arts coordinators, with teaching certification in an arts discipline, to oversee curriculum implementation, alignment of programs between schools, and coordination of personnel and resources. Develop Appropriate Facilities We recommend that communities require new school buildings and additions to include appropriate physical facilities to support arts instruction. Remove Barriers to Field Trips We recommend Michigan arts education organizations work to reduce the barrier of transportation costs for school arts-related field trips. Fund Arts Education We recommend that Michigan foundations and grantmakers target arts education as a priority in funding initiatives. STUDENT ACCESS Annual spending for curricular support of arts education averages only $4.39 per pupil in high school and only $1.67 per pupil in elementary school - just 2.5 cents a day in high school and less than a penny a day in elementary school. Percent of schools with at least one certified arts teacher 4 5

PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION & DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION & DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS WHAT WE KNOW Despite the fact that many arts courses are not being taught by certified arts specialists, only 17% of regular classroom teachers and only 13% of classroom teachers teaching the arts receive professional development in arts education. Types of Teachers Afforded Professional Development in Arts Education Increase Professional Development for Administrators We recommend the Michigan Department of Education work with partner organizations to increase professional development in arts education for school administrators. Professional Development Incentives for Educators Only 46% of certified arts specialists receive professional development in arts education. 39% of teachers do not receive continuing education credits for arts education professional development. 47% of teachers do not receive release time for arts education professional development. Only 48% of school districts host districtwide professional development for arts teachers or planning meetings for arts staff. Only 46% of certified arts specialists receive professional development in arts education. Expand Professional Development for Educators We recommend the Michigan Department of Education and the Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs work with partner organizations to expand professional development in the arts for arts educators. Identify Best Practices & Connect Schools Statewide We recommend the Michigan Department of Education work with partner organizations to identify model schools in the arts and to develop a best practices guide to assist schools in creating strong arts education programs. We further recommend the creation of an interschool arts education network where teachers and administrators from challenged schools can connect with and learn from model schools. Only 48% of school districts host professional development for arts teachers or planning meetings for arts staff. Only 13% of classroom teachers teaching arts courses receive professional development in arts education. 6 7

ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS WHAT WE KNOW While elementary schools boast 70% student participation in the arts, participation dwindles to 30% or less in high school. 37% of schools have not aligned their curriculum with the Michigan Arts Education Standards adopted in 1998. 31% of schools have not updated their curriculum to meet the Michigan Merit Curriculum Guidelines for the Visual, Performing, and Applied Arts adopted in 2006. 53% of schools have not updated their arts education plans at all. To report student progress against state arts standards, 64% of schools use teacherdeveloped assessments, 17% of schools use district-developed assessments, and 19% of schools report no assessment. 13% of schools do not weight arts education grades equally with grades in other academic areas when calculating grade point averages. 35% of schools do not grant honors arts courses equal weight with other honors courses when calculating grade point averages. 37% of schools have not aligned their curriculum with state arts education standards adopted in 1998. Require Accountability require schools to report annually on 1) student access to arts courses; 2) the level of student participation in the arts; 3) the number and certification status of educators providing arts instruction and course/class assignments; and 4) how arts education standards are being met. We further recommend providing incentives for school improvement and recognition for outstanding programs. Define Certification Standards define standards of licensure for all arts disciplines, and work with Michigan universities to align those standards with degree programs. Include Arts in Strategic Plans We recommend school districts include visual and performing arts in strategic plans and ensure that programs meet Michigan standards. Require Arts for College Admission We recommend that Michigan colleges and universities include visual and performing arts coursework in high school GPA calculations, and require the equivalent of one year of high school arts instruction for admission. Schools That Have an Arts Curriculum Aligned with the Michigan Arts Standards (adopted in 1998). Weight Courses Equally We recommend school districts weight arts courses equally with non-arts courses in calculating grade point averages, and, in schools where non-arts honors courses receive added weight, honors arts courses do also. Develop Arts Education Assessment System work with partner organizations to develop, pilot and implement a statewide assessment system to evaluate 1) teacher training and 2) student skills acquisition in all arts disciplines. Year Schools Updated to Michigan Merit Curriculum Guidelines for the Visual, Performing, and Applied Arts (adopted in 2006) 53% of schools have not updated their arts education plans. 8 9

ARTS EDUCATION INDEX & MODEL SCHOOLS MOVING FORWARD DEVELOPING THE ARTS EDUCATION INDEX In the measurement of arts education in the Michigan public schools, the project team wanted to account for the diverse manifestations of arts education. To this end, an arts education index was calculated for each participating school. The index score is composed of up to 24 different components. They include quantitative measures of: Courses & Breadth of Arts Offerings Student Participation Teachers & Instruction Facilities & Resources Policies & Professional Development Supervision & Assessment The index is an arithmetic combination of scores related to survey responses on the various components of arts education in each school. The index scores are standardized and have a possible range from 0 to 100, where 0 signifies no attempt at all at arts education in the school, and 100 indicates a complete effort in every aspect of arts education measured in the study. TEST SCORES AND DROPOUT RATES Using the index score to build multivariate statistical models, researchers found schools with higher Arts Education Index scores also had higher scores on the following standardized tests: ACT Overall ACT English ACT Math ACT Reading MME Science MME Writing MME Math MME Reading MME Social Studies Researchers also found a significant correlation between high Arts Education Index scores and low dropout rates - schools with higher Arts Education Index scores had fewer dropouts than those with lower indices. These correlations existed regardless of the socioeconomic status of the students - even among poorer schools, those with higher indices showed higher test scores and lower dropout rates. THE FUTURE OF ARTS EDUCATION IN MICHIGAN The 21 st century demands that learners of all ages be welleducated, well-rounded thinkers and problem solvers. A complete education, including rigorous training in the arts, develops students capacity to think critically, collaborate, communicate and innovate - essential skills for success in today s rapidly changing world. Arts education must flourish as part of the core curriculum to ensure that Michigan s children have the readiness to succeed in school and beyond the classroom. Following the recommendations in this report will establish a solid foundation for arts education in Michigan; provide access for every student to standards-based, sequential arts education in music, dance, theatre and visual art; ensure that certified arts specialists are upholding exacting standards of discipline and craft; and assist communities to support these vital programs. Arts education is not a luxury. It is a necessary component of the education of the whole child. Arts education improves motivation, concentration, discipline and teamwork. Students actively participating in arts education show improved test scores, and lower dropout rates and at-risk behaviors. There is work to be done. Community leaders, policy-makers, school administrators and others must provide leadership to ensure the future of arts education in Michigan. The recommedations in this report will not be met simply because they are worthwhile, or even vital. They will only be met when the citizens of Michigan demand it. They will only be met when community leaders cannot escape the certain knowledge that their constituents refuse to consign their children to a state without a robust arts education system. Michigan school scores ranged from 0 to 83, with an average around 33. MODEL SCHOOLS IN THE ARTS The ultimate goal of the Michigan Arts Education Survey is to improve arts education in the state. Michigan Youth Arts and its statewide partners will use the Arts Education Index to identify potential Model Schools in the Arts. The team will work with exemplary schools to discover what makes their programs thrive and create a network to share their knowledge with other schools in Michigan. Criteria for selecting model schools will almost certainly include: Providing instruction in all four arts disciplines and meeting state curriculum and graduation guidelines and requirements. Employing a district-based arts supervisor with arts certification to coordinate arts programs. Fostering support for the arts from the district and building level, allocating money for arts programs in the budget. Encouraging a high level of collaboration and respect between all members of the visual and performing arts staff. Embracing flexibility to overcome obstacles and adjust to the ever-changing educational landscape. 10 11

MICHIGAN ARTS EDUCATION RECOMMENDATIONS Require Accountability require schools to report annually on 1) student access to arts courses; 2) the level of student participation in the arts; 3) the number and certification status of educators providing arts instruction and course/class assignments; and 4) how arts education standards are being met. We further recommend providing incentives for school improvement and recognition for outstanding programs. Define Certification Standards define standards of licensure for all arts disciplines, and work with Michigan universities to align those standards with degree programs. Provide Access for All Students and the Michigan State Board of Education, in partnership with other statewide organizations, implement strategies to reduce the number of students without access to arts education from over 100,000 to zero. Identify Schools in Need and the Michigan State Board of Education identify schools where arts instruction is unavailable or very limited and support policies and resources that restore arts education in those schools. Include Arts in Strategic Plans We recommend school districts include visual and performing arts in strategic plans and ensure that programs meet Michigan standards. Provide Access to All Arts Disciplines We recommend schools provide access to courses in music, dance, theatre and visual art. Develop Arts Education Funding Standards develop a recommended level of funding to support arts instruction in public schools. Require Arts for College Admission We recommend that Michigan colleges and universities include visual and performing arts coursework in high school GPA calculations, and require the equivalent of one year of high school arts instruction for admission. Increase Professional Development for Administrators work with partner organizations to increase professional development in arts education for school administrators. Expand Professional Development for Educators and the Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs work with partner organizations to expand professional development in the arts for arts educators. Weight Courses Equally We recommend school districts weight arts courses equally with non-arts courses in calculating grade point averages, and, in schools where non-arts honors courses receive added weight, honors arts courses do also. Employ Arts Coordinators We recommend all districts employ arts coordinators, with teaching certification in an arts discipline, to oversee curriculum implementation, alignment of programs between schools, and coordination of personnel and resources. Develop Arts Education Assessment System work with partner organizations to develop, pilot and implement a statewide assessment system to evaluate 1) teacher training and 2) student skills acquisition in all arts disciplines. Identify Best Practices & Connect Schools Statewide work with partner organizations to identify model schools in the arts and to develop a best practices guide to assist schools in creating strong arts education programs. We further recommend the creation of an interschool arts education network where teachers and administrators from challenged schools can connect with and learn from model schools. Develop Appropriate Facilities We recommend that communities require new school buildings and additions to include appropriate physical facilities to support arts instruction. Remove Barriers to Field Trips We recommend Michigan arts education organizations work to reduce the barrier of transportation costs for school artsrelated field trips Fund Arts Education We recommend that Michigan foundations and grantmakers target arts education as a priority in funding initiatives. COMMISSIONED BY MICHIGAN YOUTH ARTS About Michigan Youth Arts Michigan Youth Arts is an alliance that develops, recognizes and advocates excellence in arts education for all. Its partners include statewide education organizations across artistic disciplines: creative writing, dance, instrumental music, media arts, music composition, theatre, visual arts, and vocal music. The strength of our combined efforts enables us to produce excellent educational opportunities for students, and to advocate for best practices in, and equal access to, arts education throughout Michigan. Michigan Youth Arts Festival The Michigan Youth Arts Festival is a comprehensive arts spectacular, culminating a nine-month search for the finest artistic talent in Michigan high schools. More than 250,000 students across the state are involved in the selection process that results in nearly 1,000 being invited to participate in the annual three-day event. At the Festival, exceptional students in the arts gather to explore, celebrate, and showcase their talent across artistic disciplines. The May 2012 Festival marked the 50 th anniversary of this extraordinary annual event. Each year the Festival features student exhibitions and performances in dance, theatre, instrumental and vocal music, visual arts, music composition, and film, as well as the publication of a volume of creative writing. Arts Expo College Fair Bringing together over 40 college and university arts programs from across the nation, the Arts Expo provides high school students the opportunity to explore higher education opportunities in the arts each October at the Lansing Center. Grantmaking Michigan Youth Arts, on behalf of the Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs, awards Arts & Culture Trek grants to cover the transportation cost of arts- and culture-related field trips for K-12 students. The program supports field trips for students in schools across the state. Advocacy, Policy and Leadership The Michigan Youth Arts Leadership Roundtable seeks to open the lines of communication between statewide organizations and various disciplines, and to discuss advocacy initiatives relevant to the arts education community as a whole. The educational leaders who serve on the Leadership Roundtable are committed to working together to develop this network and provide a forum for participating organizations to share arts education challenges and best practices, within and across disciplines. Michigan Youth Arts also brings together arts education associations and civic leaders in an annual policy forum to address issues in arts education throughout the state. Contact Michigan Youth Arts 301 W 4th St, Suite 415, Royal Oak, MI 48067 248-545-9200 (t) 248-545-9201 (f) info@michiganyoutharts.org www.michiganyoutharts.org To download a copy of the complete research findings visit michiganyoutharts.org. 12

14