ANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)



Similar documents
Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

How To Write Off A Car

EVALUATION OF VEHICLE SIDE AIRBAG SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS

PREDICTING THE USED CAR SAFETY RATINGS CRASHWORTHINESS RATING FROM ANCAP SCORES

Pole/Tree Crashes; Injury Outcomes; New Car Assessment Programme; Australian design Rules (ADR s)

Four-wheel drive vehicle crash involvement patterns

Long-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions

Prevention of Head Injuries to Car Occupants: An Investigation of Interior Padding Options

Low Delta-V Crashes Resulting in Serious Injury. Questions

Assessment of the need for, and the likely benefits of, enhanced side impact protection in the form of a Pole Side Impact Global Technical Regulation

Characteristics of High Injury Severity Crashes on km/h Rural Roads in South Australia

Scapula Fractures and Other Shoulder Injuries: Occupant, Vehicle, and Impact Differences

CIREN Improved Injury Causation Coding Methods; An Initial Review

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes

German Insurance Association No. 38. Compact accident research. Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany

New York Study of Booster Seat Effects on Injury Reduction Compared to Safety Belts in Children Aged 4-8 in Motor Vehicle Crashes

Using statistical modelling to predict crash risks, injury outcomes and compensation costs in Victoria.

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

keeping mobile Vehicle modifications for drivers and passengers with a disability

Accident Analysis Methodology and Development of Injury Scenarios

Rick Galdos, Forensic Engineering 1

Does the Federal government require them? No, the Federal government does not require manufacturers to install EDRs.


40,46 16,22 16,25. no fx thoracic sp. Fx lumbar spine. no fx lumbar. spine

What is a definition of insurance?

Determinants of Claim Frequency In CTP Schemes

ASK THE CAR WHAT HAPPENED

Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

A Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes

Supplementary restraints system

Talking Points. About Roadway Users

Event Data Recorder - Reference Document

Data linkage for paediatric trauma and health services research

Auto Insurers Adventure in US Highway Safety

Table 1. Summary of Crashworthiness Rating Methods and Databases. Essential characteristics

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Paper Number Paine, Page 1

How To Compare Head Injury Risk From A Front Crash Test To Head Injury From A Head Injury

Iowa CODES Fact Sheet 1. Traumatic Brain Injuries Caused by Motor Vehicle Crash (MVC)

CLAIM FORM A. To be completed by the registered operator/ owner or driver of the vehicle

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

INVESTIGATION OF LOWER SPINE COMPRESSION FRACTURES IN FRONTAL CRASHES

UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Injury Prevention & Crash Dynamics

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

! # %&& # ( ) ( +, #.! /!!, # 01&

Ambulance Re-design to Reduce EMS Injuries: Influencing Design through Standards Development. Paul H. Moore, NIOSH Division of Safety Research

Some injury scaling issues in UK crash research

Determinants of Claim Frequency in CTP Schemes. Raewin Davies, Jack Jiang and Rosi Winn

Safety of Blacktown City Council Lease Back vehicle drivers

A GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

FATAL SINGLE VEHICLE CRASHES STUDY SUMMARY REPORT

Sources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)

How Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired Comparison Study of Car-to-Car Crashes

OREGON TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INSURANCE REPORT

climate unit for the passenger compartment.

INCREASING MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE

Frontal Crash Protection

SAE / Government Meeting. Washington, D.C. May 2005

Just Car Comprehensive Car Insurance Premium, Excesses & Claims Guide

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS

Improving Driving Safety Through Automation

UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Child Car Restraints

Virginia's Child Passenger Safety Laws

DMV. OREGON TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INSURANCE REPORT Tear this sheet off your report, read and carefully follow the directions.

THORACIC INJURY CHARACTERISTICS OF ELDERLY DRIVERS IN REAL WORLD CAR ACCIDENTS

Injuries of foot and ankle in front seat car occupants

Cycling injuries in Australia: Road safety s blind spot?

Highlights and Changes in NHTSA's Real-World Data Collection for Rollover Crashes

Shane Pope worked in the hospitality industry after leaving school and commenced a Bachelor of Science at Edith Cowan University in 2001.

ROAD SAFETY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT MONOGRAPH 20. Fatal and serious road crashes involving motorcyclists

Claim notification form (RTA1) Low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents ( 1,000-25,000)

Transcription:

ANCIS The Australian National Crash In-depth Study David Logan (MUARC)

What is ANCIS? Study of modern vehicle real world crash performance and occupant injuries Criteria: Occupants of crashed vehicles who have been hospitalised as a result of their injuries The car in which they were travelling was manufactured since 1989

Objectives To determine patterns and severities of severe crashes and occupant injury causation To help devise countermeasures to minimise these injuries To evaluate existing safety features To identify crash injury trends and car safety issues To understand human, vehicle and environmental factors contributing to crash occurrence

1. Crash Case Timeline OCCUPANT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 2. Occupant Data (Human) VEHICLE DETAILS FROM OCCUPANT 3. Vehicle Inspection SITE DETAILS FROM AMB. NOTES, POLICE REPORT 5. Case Finalisation 4. Crash Site (Environment)

Method Occupant Data Purpose: Occupant performance, account of crash, injuries, contributing factors Research Nurses recruit participants in hospitals Melbourne (6), Sydney (3) and Hobart (1) Occupant Patient and/or relative s consent required Structured interview where possible Injury data from medical records HUMAN VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT

Method Vehicle Inspection Purpose: Type and severity of impact(s), performance of vehicle structure, restraint and safety systems Vehicle examination Impacts and deformations Structural integrity Intrusion Seating and restraints (inc. child restraints) Occupant contact points with interior HUMAN VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT

Method Crash Site Purpose: Role of road environment Retrospective site examination Exact crash location, time and type (DCA) Road and intersection type, configuration, surface Medians and shoulders Traffic control devices Crash evidence Environment and weather HUMAN VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT

Method Summing Up Crash severity (Delta-V, EBS) Injury contacts Crash circumstances Contributing factors Review panel Summary sheet Database entry HUMAN VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT

Results

Occupant Characteristics Overall: 216 cases in database 55% male, 45% female 74% drivers, 18% front seat passengers, 9% rear seat passengers Drivers/Front seat passenger Mean age 43 yrs (range 4-87 yrs) 87% belted, 5% unbelted (cf. 95% overall)

Belt Use Passenger Front Centre Driver 81% 0% 89% Rear Left Rear Centre Rear Right 67% 100% 60%

Airbags Front: 24% fitted and deployed 76% not fitted/not deployed Side: 3% fitted and deployed 97% not fitted/not deployed

ANCIS Crash Types 9% 5% 51% 35% Front Side Rollover Rear

ANCIS vs TAC Crash Types TAC ANCIS 5% 7% 9% 5% 19% 51% 69% 35% Front Side Rollover Rear Front Side Rollover Rear

Injury Severity by Impact Type Percentage of crashes Mean ISS 9 6% 19 9% 9 5% 14 52% 20 28% Front Near side Far side Rollover Rear

Crash Type by Collision Partner Percentage of crashes Impact + roll 7% 4WD 7% Roll 3% Other 4% Tree/pole/post 29% Heavy 7% Multiple 16% Car/utility 27%

Injury Severity by Collision Partner Percentage of crashes Mean ISS 19 Impact + roll 7% 9 4WD 7% 14 Roll 3% 13 Other 4% 18 Tree/pole/post 29% 15 Heavy 7% 17 Multiple 16% 12 Car/utility 27%

Front/Side Impact Severity Number Mean EBS Frontal Side 29 53 37 51 21 36 23 32 Car-car Car-pole/tree Car-car Car-pole/tree

Front/Side Impact Severity Mean ISS Number Frontal Side 15 29 12 37 24 21 12 23 Car-car Car-pole/tree Car-car Car-pole/tree

AIS2+ Injuries All Impacts Overall injuries suffered 44% chest (69% in car-heavy vehicle) 22% head (35% in rollover) 16% spine (24% in rollover)

AIS2+ Injuries Side Impacts Car-to-car vs car-to-pole/tree Head, 17% vs 43% Abdomen, 22% vs 33% Lower extremity, 48% vs 62% Near side vs far side Chest, 60% vs 17% Lower extremities, 57% vs 33% Abdomen, 32% vs 8% Spine 17% vs 33%

What Will ANCIS Contribute? Recent Improvements More site information System-wide approach Analyses Contributing factors Airbag effectiveness (ADR69) Head injury modelling Characteristics of multiple impacts Road environment modelling

Acknowledgements Sponsors Australian Transport Safety Bureau Autoliv Australia DIER (Tas.) Ford Motor Company of Australia Holden MAA (NSW) NRMA (NSW) RACV (Vic.) RTA (NSW) Toyota Motor Corporation TAC (Vic.) VicRoads Observers FCAI AAA Mitsubishi Victorian Hospitals The Alfred Box Hill Hospital Dandenong Hospital Geelong Hospital Monash Medical Centre Royal Children s Hospital The Royal Melbourne Hospital NSW Hospitals Liverpool Hospital Prince of Wales Hospital St George Hospital Tasmanian Hospitals Royal Hobart Hospital http://www.monash.edu.au/muarc