RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU ON NOTIFIED BODIES AUDITS



Similar documents
Update: Proposed Medical Device Regulation (MDR) & IVD Regulation (IVDR)

Medical Devices. Notified Bodies and the CE certification Process for Medical Devices. European Surgical Robotics Demonstration Day

Want to know more about the Notified Body?

Frequently Asked Questions. Unannounced audits for manufacturers of CE-marked medical devices. 720 DM a Rev /10/02

WHITEPAPER: SOFTWARE APPS AS MEDICAL DEVICES THE REGULATORY LANDSCAPE

Preparing for Unannounced Inspections from Notified Bodies

FINAL DOCUMENT. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Management Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers Part 1: General Requirements

CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER 2015 BINDT Audit Procedure Conformity Assessment and Certification/Verification of Management Systems

Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections. Final Version of Annex 16 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES

Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) Pyrotechnics Division 2.3 Explosives D Berlin Berlin,

ISO 13485:201x What is in the new standard?

Konformitätsbewertung 3.9 B 17. Guidance for Notified Bodies auditing suppliers to medical device manufacturers

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY VERSION 7

OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01

Med-Info. Council Directive 93/42/EEC on Medical Devices. TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH

BSI Unannounced Audits

NOTICE. Re: GD210: ISO 13485:2003 Quality Management System Audits Performed by Health Canada Recognized Registrars

How To Know If A Mobile App Is A Medical Device

P-01 Certification Procedure for QMS, EMS, EnMS & OHSAS. Procedure. Application, Audit and Certification

EPF Position Statement on the European Commission s proposal for a Regulation on In Vitro Medical Devices

Medical Device Directive 2007/47/EC What is New? Are we moving towards Drug Rules?

Basic Information about the European Directive 93/42/EEC on Medical Devices

EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL PHARMACISTS GROUP

Changes to Medical Device Regulations

Liechtenstein. Heinz Frommelt. Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd

European Regulatory Newsletter July - September 2013

Medical Device Training Program 2015

Qualified Persons in the Pharmaceutical Industry Code of Practice 2009, updated August 2015

Workshop High Frequency Trading Act. Questions regarding special organisational requirements pursuant to section 33 (1a) Securities Trading Act (WpHG)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL VERSION 4.1

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

Reporting Changes to your Notified Body

Audit of the control body through the monitoring of compliance with control plan. Measures for the irregularities

DIRECTIVE 2014/32/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

End of consultation (deadline for comments) 14 October Adoption by Committee for advanced therapies 15 October 2010

UNOFFICIAL CONSOLIDATION AND TRANSLATION OF LAWS 128(I) OF 2009 AND 52(I) OF 2010 THE PAYMENT SERVICES LAWS OF 2009 TO 2010

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 1 MARKETING AUTHORISATION. November 2005

European Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

1. Consultation of the Committee (SCFCAH)

Response of the German Medical Association

PRCP CE. Version 5.0 of 16 June Date of entry into force: 1 July 2013

John Keel, CPA State Auditor. An Audit Report on Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies at the Board of Pharmacy. August 2015 Report No.

EMA Update Clinical Trials

Explanatory notes VAT invoicing rules

Guidance for Industry: Starting Material Supplier Management

Guidelines on operational functioning of colleges

Safeguarding public health The Regulation of Software as a Medical Device

The Quality System for Drugs in Germany

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 16 October 2013 (OR. en) 14827/13 AVIATION 181

TENDER SPECIFICATIONS

FAMI-QS Certification Rules for Operators. Rules for Operators

CHAPTER 6 PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORS

Comments from EASAC and FEAM on the In vitro diagnostic medical devices Regulation

PROCUREMENT OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES AND HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK

System of Governance

PLM: Privat Label Manufacturer (Customer of the OEM-PLM relation) OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer (Supplier of the OEM-PLM relation)

Guidelines for Applicants

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Improving self-regulation through (law-based) Corporate Data Protection Officials *

COMBINE. Part B. Manual for Marine Monitoring in the. Programme of HELCOM. General guidelines on quality assurance for monitoring in the Baltic Sea

Market surveillance of machinery

General Regulations. Part Ⅱ - Quality Management System Rules ENGLISH VERSION 5.0

GMP Issues for Start-Ups, quality in the supply chain and role of the Qualified Person (QP)

Guidelines for Applicants

VACANCY NOTICE FOR THE POSTS. 3 Project Managers. to the Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI-JU)

BSI Road Show: September 8 th to 15 th, 2014

Recent Updates on European Requirements and what QPs are expected to do

12040/1/15 REV 1 LES/ns 1 DG B 3B

CHAPTER Verification of non-existence of the grounds for exclusion. Article 1

The Role and Function of a Data Protection Officer in the European Commission s Proposed General Data Protection Regulation. Initial Discussion Paper

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Analytical Fiche Nr 16. Common administrative support for agencies

General Rules for the certification of Management Systems

Asset Management Company in Liechtenstein

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Enterprise and Industry DG

MEDICAL DEVICES SECTOR

POSITION PAPER THE PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL DEVICES. Berlin, 29 April 2013

Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification

GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE CONCEPT OF RELIANCE

Table of Contents. Preface 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Scope 3.0 Purpose 4.0 Rationale 5.0 References 6.0 Definitions

PHARMACY TECHNICIAN TRAINING REQUIREMENT. (Guidance Document) Effective January 1, 2014, the Board will not renew the registration of a pharmacy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué Issy-les-Moulineaux

3 Terms and definitions 3.5 client organization whose management system is being audited for certification purposes

Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries

Comparison of EU-Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) with US System

Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012

Auditing as a Component of a Pharmaceutical Quality System

DG RTD COMMON AUDIT SERVICE SPECIFIC PRIVACY STATEMENT EXTERNAL AUDIT AND CONTROL

New EU Data Protection legislation comes into force today. What does this mean for your business?

Insurance Europe key messages on the European Commission's proposed General Data Protection Regulation

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CUSTOM-MADE MEDICAL DEVICES

Registration of Class B Medical Devices

The Auditor General's Act

Occupational Health Management Systems No. : RL 18 Competence requirements for inspection and certification Date :

DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

OUTSOURCING, HOSTING AND DATA PRIVACY ISSUES

How to apply for Medical Device License in Taiwan

Transcription:

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU ON NOTIFIED BODIES AUDITS Questions and Problems in the Field 1 RAin Dr. Angela Graf Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Hersteller 28. Oktober 2014

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU IN NOTIFIED BODY-AUDITS BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? Background and Basics Questions and Problems in the Field Conclusion 2

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU IN NOTIFIED BODY-AUDITS BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? Background and Basics Questions and Problems in the Field Conclusion 3

BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? GERMAN MEDICINES MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION Registered Association ( e.v. ), founded 1954 in Cologne Offices in Bonn Bad-Godesberg (Main Office) and Berlin 40 Employees (therefrom 23 academics: Art Scolars, Biologists, Chemists, Computer Scientist, Economists, Lawyers, Nutritionists, Pharmacists) BAH is with more than 460 members the biggest industrial association in the sector of medicines in Germany Members are settled in the following business areas: German branche offices of global operating companies Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) All relevant manufacturers of generic drugs Consulting firms, CROs, Agencies, Publishing Houses etc. 4

BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? MANUFACTURERS OF SUBSTANCE-BASED AND DENTAL MEDICAL DEVICES ARE BAH MEMBERS For example Nose sprays (seawater-derived) Products for the treatment of acute sore throat Products for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders Laxatives that absorbe water Eye drops Medicinal clay Products for the treatment of infestation with head lice For example: Dental filling material (e.g. composits) Dental bondings Dental Inlays Dental cannulas Dental crowns Artificial teeths Polymerisation activators (light) 5

OUR WORLD-WIDE ACTIVITIES BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? BAH Offices in Bonn and Berlin 40 Employees Committees (e.g. Medical Devices, Economy, Communication, Phyto- Medicines) AESGP Office in Brusseles 6 Employees Committees (e.g. Reglatory Affairs, Medical Devices) Bundestag and Bundesrat Federal Government Higher federal authorities Organisations in the context of healthcare Associations, Media European Commission European Parliament European Medicines Agency, European Associations, Media WSMI Office in Ferney-Voltaire (France) 5 Employees World Health Organisation (WHO) 6

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU IN NOTIFIED BODY-AUDITS BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? Background and Basics Questions and Problems in the Field Conclusion 7

Background and Basics BACKGROUND 2012: Joint Plan for Immediate Action launched by the European Commission s Directorate-General DG Sanco One of the main objectives: Ensure that all notified bodies in the context of the conformity assessment make full use of their powers given to them under the current legislation including the powers to conduct unannounced inspections. (European Commission Press Release IP/12/119, 9 February 2012) 24 September 2013 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 920/2013: designation and the supervision of notified bodies Commission Recommendation (EU) No 2013/473: audits and assessments performed by notified bodies in the field of medical devices 8

Background and Basics RECOMMENDATION (EU) NO 2013/473 Articles Annex I Product Assessment (design & type of examination) Annex II Quality System Assessment Annex III Unannounced Visits Link: http://eurlex.europa.eu/lexuris erv/lexuriserv.do?uri= OJ:L:2013:253:0027:0 035:EN:PDF 9

Background and Basics RECOMMENDATION (EU) NO 2013/473 Article 1 Purpose By providing general guidelines for such assessments and unannounced audits, this Recommendation should facilitate the work of the notified bodies as well as the Member States evaluation thereof. This Recommendation does not create any new rights and obligations. The legal requirements applicable to all types of devices and conformity assessments are set out in the Union legislation on medical devices. 10 10

Background and Basics 2013/473/EU - BINDING RULES? Is the Recommendation 2013/473/EU a text without any legally binding obligations but only the interpretation of law in force?*? Annexes: Notified Bodies should verify / examine / identify / carry out unannounced audits ( ) Should in the context of legal texts is normally connected with an elementary rule with exemptions in justified circumstances. see also: Dr. Lücker, Volker: Empfehlungen der EU-Kommission als neues Rechtsinstrument? MPJ 2014, Heft 2, S. 115ff. 11 11

Background and Basics 2013/473/EU - BINDING RULES? But: Is it legitimate to launch a nonbinding recommendation when there was before already a Commissions Draft for a Medical Device Regulation as a binding rule with the identical aim? Some parts of the recommendation do not only interprete the law in force but do establish new rules (e.g. testing of samples, unannounced audits). Does this fit together with the legal character of a recommendation? Is this only a theoretical discussion between lawyers? An inconsistent modus operandi of Notified Bodies within Europe leads to a fragmentation of the legal framework and results in unfair competition. 12 12

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU IN NOTIFIED BODY-AUDITS BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? Background and Basics Questions and Problems in the Field Conclusion 13 13

Questions and Problems in the Field DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS I Critical subcontractor Subcontractors in charge of processes which are essential for ensuring compliance with legal requirements Crucial supplier Supplier of crucial components Supplier of the entire devices If a process is essential for the compliance or if a component is a crucial component also depend on the complexity of the supplied component (e.g.: some software) the complexity of the supplied process (e.g.: sterilization processes) 14 14

Questions and Problems in the Field DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS II Small amounts Incoming testing Manufacturer B: Dental Medical Device Manufacturer A: Triclosan Protective Sealant for Exposed Dentin Triclosan is chemically well-defined! Triclosan is not a crucial component Mechanical Protection from Abrasion by Sealant Triclosan for Protection from Plaque Formation and Caries Associated Bacteria at the Surface of Sealant Final Inspection Batch Release 15 15

Questions and Problems in the Field DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS III Key terms such as critical subcontractor or crucial supplier should be clarified in order to reach a common understanding among manufacturers and Notified Bodies. And.!!!!! Notified bodies may, instead of or in addition to visiting the manufacturer, visit one of the premises of the manufacturer s critical subcontractors or crucial suppliers if this is likely to ensure more efficient control. (Annex III, Number 2) 16 16

Questions and Problems in the Field DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS IV UAAs* should be carried out at suppliers and subcontractors only in justified cases, e.g. insufficient control of the manufacturer or in case of final product suppliers. FDA has stopped the auditing of suppliers many years ago. It was taken into account that for many suppliers the medical devices industry represents only a small part of the total turnover. Auditing just because of formal aspects and not of justified rationale would probably lead to a delivery stop for some medical device companies. * UAA: Unannounced audit 17 17

Questions and Problems in the Field PRODUCT ASSESSMENT (ANNEX I) Where the manufacturer has applied for design dossier examination or for a type examination: Notified Body should verify if the device is correctly qualified as medical device the classification of the devices and wether the manufacturer has fulfilled the applicable conformity assessment obligations the compliance of the device with the relevant Essential Requirements and with the common technical specifications all documentation related to the device conformity assessment that the clinical data is update The Notified Body should examine the requirements regarding the design, manufacture and packaging of the device The Notified Body should review all relevant preclinical follow-up data, the clinical evaluation and the post-market clinical follow-up. 18 18

Questions and Problems in the Field QUALITIY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT (ANNEX II) Where the manufacturer has applied for an assessment of its quality system: The quality system assessment should include audits of the premises of the manufacturer The Notified Body should identify which products the manufacturer identify as covered by the quality system assessment The Notified Body should identify the post-market information available to them or to the manufacturer The Notified Body should review the technical documentation on the basis of the representative sample for class IIa and IIb The Notified Body carry out or ask for relevant tests of the device. 19 19

Questions and Problems in the Field OEM*- PLM**- RELATIONSHIP I Annex II: General advice in case of outsourcing of the production via subcontractors or suppliers Notified bodies should note that manufacturers: ( ) (b) do not fulfill their obligation to have at their disposal the full technical documentation and/or of a quality system by referring to the technical documentation of a subcontractor or supplier and/or to their quality system; * OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer (i.e. company that physically produces the medical device) ** PLM: Private Label Manufacturer (i.e. company that places the device on the market without producing it itself; manufacturer in the sense of the medical devices law) 20 20

Questions and Problems in the Field OEM-PLM-RELATIONSHIP II PLM** Expertise Know-How OEM* Unrealistic!!! * OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer (i.e. company that physically produces the medical device) ** PLM: Private Label Manufacturer (i.e. company that places the device on the market without producing it itself; manufacturer in the sense of the medical devices law) 21 21

Questions and Problems in the Field OEM-PLM-RELATIONSHIP III The reference to the audit report concerning the technical documentation of the OEM s Notified Body must be possible furthermore together with the stipulation, that the PLM can have full access if necessary. An excerpt of the technical documentation is placed at the disposal of the PLM by the OEM, as appropriate. 22 22

Questions and Problems in the Field SAMPLES I Annex II, 4: For medical devices of Class IIa or IIb, the notified bodies should review the technical documentation on the basis of representative samples ( ) Where doubts arise as to the conformity of a device, including its documentation, notified bodies should carry out or ask for relevant tests of the device. ( ) 23 23

Questions and Problems in the Field SAMPLES II Multi-level Procedure should be best practice: (1) Testing of samples should be generally performed at the manufacturer's site as an eye witness test. (2) If the manufacturer is unable to carry out such tests as part of the audit, there should be the possibility to put the samples in quarantine and perform the tests as part of an extended or newly applied audit in the presence of an Notified Body-Auditor. (3) Only if this is not possible, an external examination of the samples by the Notified Body should be executed; in this case, a cross-check sample remains with the manufacturer. 24 24

Questions and Problems in the Field UNANNOUNCED AUDITS (UAAs) Article 2c To verify the day-to-day compliance with legal obligations, notified bodies should, in addition to the initial, surveillance or renewal audits, visit the manufacturer or, if this is likely to ensure more efficient control, one of its subcontractors in charge of processes which are essential for ensuring compliance with legal requirements ( critical subcontractor ) or a supplier of crucial components or of the entire devices (both: crucial supplier ) without prior notice ( unannounced audits ) in accordance with Annex III. Specifications in Annex III 25 25

UAAs ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS I Questions and Problems in the Field UAAs should not take longer than one day. The audit team should consist of 2 persons at the maximum. One of both auditors should be familiar with the audited of the manufacturer and the related manufacturing processes. UAAs should take place only once in every 3 years (also for class III medical devices). Exceptions are justified in the suspicion or under vigilance aspects (e.g. increased error rate of a product group). Aim of UAAs is to verify the day-to-day compliance with legal obligations. Purpose in an efficient and practicable control and not to performe a lot of audits with high costs (audit costs of Notified Bodies and subcontractors / suppliers will be passed on the manufacturer). 26 26

UAA S ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS II Questions and Problems in the Field Possibility of a Matrix-UAA Monitoring for manufacturers with a multi-site (e.g. root of number of monitored manufacturer sites). It should be legitimate to submit documents that are usefull for the clarification of the audit result within a specified time frame after the UAA (e.g. 48 hours). The request to inform the NB about processing times should be avoided as it is not practibally feasible. Instead, guidelines should be developed how to carry out UAAs if the target product specified in the audit plan is not produced at that time. In this case an adaption of the audit plan to devices currently being manufactured would be quite possible without missing the fundamental objective of the UAA recommendation. 27 27

RECOMMENDATION 2013/473/EU IN NOTIFIED BODY-AUDITS BAH - Who we are and why do we care about medical devices? Background and Basics Questions and Problems in the Field Conclusion 28 28

Questions and Problems in the Field CONCLUSION The character of the recommendation is not clear. This will lead to an incostistent implementation within Europe. There are a lot of unsolved questions and problems in the field. Manufacturers need legal certainty. Dialog between Notified Bodies and Manufacturers is necessary in order to find practical solutions. 29 29

RAin Dr. Angela Graf Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Hersteller e.v. Ubierstraße 71-73 53173 Bonn 0228/957 45 31 Graf@bah-bonn.de 30 30