Instructional Supervision: Curriculum Theory for District Administration 3 credits EDL 847

Similar documents
Organizational Analysis, Planning and Assessment 3 credits

How To Teach Power And Politics In Educational Leadership

Current Issues in School Leadership 3 credits EDL 827

Dissertation Seminar III: Data Collection 3 credits EDL 867

Organization and Human Resources Management 3 credits EDL 845

Critical Analysis of Systemic Inequity: Social Justice Education 3 credits EDL 820

BUS311: Essentials of IS

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

LU-EdS Handbook. Educational Specialist Degree Handbook

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Georgia Regents University College of Education Department of Teacher Education. EDTD 7950A Advanced Topics in Content Area

Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership

Curriculum, Instruction, and Professional Development EDS

CED 117 Interpersonal Skills in Human Relationships (3 Sem Hours) Department of Education and Clinical Studies Fall, 2015 Online Education

EFRT 305 Human Development and Learning

Standards for Educational Leaders (Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors)

Joint Doctoral Program Doctor of Education Educational Leadership

Council on Social Work Education. Curriculum Policy Statement for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Social Work Education

Licensure Program Content Guidelines Matrix for Principal

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

EIS 301, SAMPLE SYLLABUS Educational Psychology Learning and Instruction Spring 2011**

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

or 30 minutes prior to the start of each class, or by prearranged appointment

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATION LEADERSHIP: ECONOMICS AND LEADERSHIP EDLE 803 (3 Credits) Spring 2005

Connie Schroeder, Ph.D., Center for Instructional and Professional Development Library E179

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

*Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators

UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience

How To Get A Teaching License In Wisconsin

Psychology as a Human Science Psychology 2010 Psychology Department University of West Georgia Fall 2014

Iowa State University Educational Leadership and Policy Studies RESEV 550XA: Educational Research

LOURDES UNIVERSITY Graduate School Master of Science in Nursing NUR 698 NURSING CAPSTONE

PROJECT MANAGEMENT COURSE SYLLABUS

Dewar College of Education and Human Services Valdosta State University Department of Curriculum, Leadership, and Technology

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses

Mathematics Education Master Portfolio School of Education, Purdue University

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

OTTAWA ONLINE EDC-7723 Instructional Design and Evaluation

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Purposes for the Culminating Experience: General Guidelines

CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING RUBRIC GRADUATE PROGRAMS

Novice Experienced Expert a. Understands the importance of ABE, ASE, and ESOL at the personal and program level. X X X

Administrative Internship Handbook

Educational Leadership Advising Handbook: Addendum to the Graduate Handbook

KIN 323 Methods of Teaching Secondary Physical Education Spring 2016

University of North Alabama College of Education and Human Sciences Course Syllabus

NATIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SERVICE Baccalaureate Study in Social Work Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Education and Training

UIC University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Special Education

PRDV.71326COA Common Core Writers Workshop: Teaching Students to Internalize and Apply Writing Strategies for High Quality Student Writing SYLLABUS

THE LINCOLN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF NURSING COURSE SYLLABUS. INSTRUCTOR: TBA EXTENSION: XXX OFFICE: XXX XXX OFFICE HRS: XXX OTHER: (Hybrid)

University of Vermont College of Education and Social Services Department of Social Work Syllabus Fall, 2004

The University of South Dakota. School of Education. Division of Educational Leadership. EDAD 701 Introduction to Educational Administration 3 credits

360 Dr. Mike Richie SUPERINTENDENT LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE

TEXTBOOK. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011

Introduction to Educational Psychology AEDP235. Spring A. AEDP 235 Introduction to Educational Psychology (3)

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Performance Management Competencies. for Schedule II Levels 7-12

English 101, WB12: Academic Writing University of Maryland, College Park Summer Session I 2015 Course Policies

TEAC principles and standards for educational leadership programs

INSTRUCTOR Amber Bolden Greer, M.Ed. Phone: Provided in class Office Hours: By appointment only

M.A.T. COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION BOOKLET

HUS 614: Communication Skills for Human Service Practitioners

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

Saint Mary s University of Minnesota School of Graduate and Professional Programs Twin Cities Campus

SBEC/TExES Framework for Principal Certification

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

BBA 305W Business Communication Class Syllabus for the Spring 2014

Teacher Leader Masters in Education Masters Action Research Project Rubric: 300 Points

LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO

EDUCATIONAL SPECIALIST (Ed.S.) Superintendent Curriculum Leadership Online

The University of Mississippi School of Education

How To Pass A Queens College Course

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

LEARNING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ADVANCED MASTERS PROGRAMS CURRICULUM STUDIES

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses

English 1302 Writing Across the Curriculum Fall 2015

Master of Science Education Capstone Experience Handbook Thesis/Project

Henderson State University Teachers College Department of Advanced Instructional Studies Educational Leadership

Alignment Table School Counseling. Austin Peay State University Professional Educational Standards, CACREP STANDARDS, and NCATE Standards

Department website:

EDME 532: TESOL INTERNSHIP AND SEMINAR SUMMER / 2015

English 1302 Writing Across the Curriculum Spring 2016

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

University of Arkansas at Little Rock School of Social Work Bachelor of Social Work Program. Pre-req: none Office phone: (501)

BUS 373 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Syllabus Fall 2015

Teacher Education Admission Interview

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION Educational Leadership Technology Online

Fall Term Syllabus MASTER SYLLABUS. Course Domain and Boundaries

Curriculum Management

Transcription:

Department of Educational Leadership & Policy College of Education & Human Services University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Instructional Supervision: Curriculum Theory for District Administration 3 credits EDL 847 Course Description This course explores the development of curriculum theory and structures within the context of philosophical, social, economic, cultural and political climates in the United States. The purpose of this exploration is to prepare students to identify high quality instruction, to diagnose instructional problems and to determine appropriate strategies to improve academic performance in Pk-12 settings. With effective district-level instructional leadership, teachers are better able to guide students to achieve at higher levels of competency. This course provides a foundation for the doctoral student to acquire knowledge, skills and values to be an expert in instruction. Course Structure This course is designed for delivery through face-to-face meetings enhanced by learning activities/discussions online. Students are expected to prepare for class meetings, take part in class activities, contribute to discussions, and support other class members. In short, the class will function as a learning community in which every member shares responsibility for the learning experience of the group. Learning Outcomes Students will understand instructional practices recognized as best practices. Students will analyze curricular theories in order develop a working knowledge of curriculum development, maintenance and revision processes. Students will recognize the strengths and weaknesses of diverse curricular theories. Students will develop, articulate, implement and steward a shared vision of learning Students will evaluate an existing district curriculum for appropriateness, including alignment to district, state and national standards. Students will review the literature and observe instructional leadership in order to formulate beliefs about leadership for advancement of instruction. Students will attend a Board of Education meeting to better understand the relationship of policy making to classroom and school-level decision-making and practice. Course Requirements 1. Participation 20% Take part in all class activities. Contribute to discussions and activities, both face-to-face and online, in a way that enhances learning for all class members. You will be required to make postings to our D2L Discussion Board. Postings will focus on assigned readings/readings done on your own and how they relate to your past experiences and future endeavors as a leader. 1

Some discussions will be open to the whole group while others will be structured as small group discussions in order to build smaller learning communities. Discussion topics will be provided with specific posting requirements noted for each discussion topic. 2. Curriculum Analysis Assignment 30% Analyze a district s curriculum using a specific model introduced in class or in readings to evaluate/audit the curricular needs of that district. (This can be your district or another district). After answering your model s guiding questions, identify and reflect upon the strengths, weaknesses, and area for improvement. Determine what recommendations you would make to the Board of Education. 3. Curriculum Theory Paper - 30% Select one of the curriculum theories discussed in class or that you found in your readings. Research and explain this theory and its significance, and analyze its impact on curriculum design, practical application and continuous progress monitoring. Incorporate course theories, philosophies, and experiential knowledge to formulate possible responses to this curricular approach and hypothesize what these responses would look like in the context of your future role as a superintendent. 4. Board of Education Meeting Attendance and Reflection 20% Attend a Board of Education meeting. Take note of all issues related to curriculum, instruction and supervision. Follow the discussions, follow-ups, adoptions, etc. that result from the actions of that meeting. Write a reflective paper indicating the processes observed, the strengths and weaknesses of the processes and your informed beliefs about the values of shared decisionmaking in a school district. General Criteria for Assessment 1. Construction of Knowledge: Students successfully interpret, analyze, evaluate, or synthesize information. 2. Depth of Understanding: Student understanding of course content is relatively complex and deep, and they demonstrate that understanding through elaborated communication. 3. Connection to Practice and Policy: Students successfully connect course content to educational practice and/or policy. They explore implications that create value and significance for knowledge. 4. Clarity of Expression: Students demonstrate quality work through well-organized, grammatically correct, precise and accurate writing. They reflect thoughtfulness in word choice, sentence construction and composition. Course Grading Scale Letter Grade Percentage Points A 94-100 A- 90-93 2

B+ 87-89 B 84-86 B- 80-83 C+ 77-79 C 74-76 F 73 or below Guidelines for Written Assignments Advanced graduate academic work requires competence in written communication to express your ideas clearly and accurately. Therefore, it is expected that students will be able to articulate their positions, reasoning, and queries with clarity, accuracy, and precision in grammatical construction and language use. Students must demonstrate critical thinking in all of their written work. Further, it is imperative that doctoral students draw upon the work of other scholars and appropriately give credit to others through in-text citations. Format Requirements for Papers Use APA (most recent edition) to format course papers. Use inclusive language (do not use masculine pronouns when referring to men and women). All papers should be double-spaced with 1-inch margins. Times New Roman font (12 point) is standard. Number the pages. Writing should be appropriately referenced, giving credit to others for their work by providing accurate citations. Where appropriate and possible, draw connections between course concepts/readings and specific examples/experiences. The capacity to relate theory with practice is an important component of the course. Writing must be grammatically correct and without spelling, punctuation, or typographical errors. Include a list of references at the end of the paper. This list should include all references cited in the paper, and only those cited in the paper. Guidelines for Online Discussions There are three very important rules for using online discussion boards: 1. Remember that the culture of mutual respect that is part of our face-to-face time extends into the virtual classroom environment. 2. Participation is required. 3. Participation alone is not enough. Posts require a thoughtful and meaningful approach. Quality does count. Also important is timing. If you wait until the end of the discussion window time, you are not engaging in the type of discussion required. See Guidelines and Rubrics for Online Discussions (D2L Course Content) for further details. Guidelines for Communication in a Respectful Learning Environment Listen receptively. Seek first to understand, then to be understood. 3

Attend to the person who has the floor. No sidebar conversations, gestures, or extraneous activity while another person is talking. Communicate honestly. If you have a concern or if you are puzzled explain how you are feeling and why. Disagree thoughtfully. Respectful questioning and disagreement is not wrong. Scholarly discourse involves and encourages exploration of different perspectives. Derogatory comments based on race, ethnicity, class, gender, sexual orientation, or nationality are not acceptable. Academic Integrity The University of Wisconsin Oshkosh is committed to a standard of academic integrity for all students. The System guidelines state: Students are responsible for the honest completion and representation of their work, for the appropriate citation of sources, and for respect of others academic endeavors. (UWS 14.01, Wisconsin Administrative Code) Students are subject to disciplinary action for academic misconduct, which is defined in UWS 14.03, Wisconsin Administrative Code. Students are encouraged to review the procedures related to violations of academic honesty as outlined in Chapter UWS 14, Wisconsin Administrative Code. The System guidelines and local procedures are printed in the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Student Discipline Code 2007-2008 and can be found on the Dean of Students website at www.uwosh.edu/dean/conduct.htm Specific questions regarding the provisions of Chapter UWS 14 (and institutional procedures approved to implement Chapter UWS 14) should be directed to the Dean of Students Office. Accessibility Statement We would like to fully include persons with disabilities in this course. Please let us know if you need any special accommodations. Information will be kept confidential whenever possible. For questions regarding UW Oshkosh policy and available services for students with disabilities, please contact John Palmer, Coordinator of Services for Students with Disabilities in the Dean of Students Office in Dempsey Hall. palmerj@uwosh.edu or 424-3100. The Writing Center All UW Oshkosh students are eligible for one-on-one conferencing at the Writing Center. Their free, confidential tutoring is designed to help writers work through assignments and gain additional writing skills. Trained peer consultants can assist writers at any stage of the composition process, from brainstorming for topics to fine-tuning a final draft. They help writers with issues like grammar and mechanics by helping them identify their own patterns of error and learning how to avoid those errors. Check their website for more information about services. (http://www.uwosh.edu/wcenter). The Writing Center is located in Suite 102 of the Student Success Center, across from Reeve and Polk on Elmwood Ave. Communication Email. Your UW Oshkosh email account is used by the University and by your instructors to communicate University and course information. Please check your UW Oshkosh email frequently. Weather Concerns. If you are unable to attend class due to hazardous conditions, please notify me via email prior to the scheduled class meeting. In the event that I cannot meet with the class, 4

or most members of the class cannot attend, we will schedule an alternative discussion/learning activity using D2L. Please check your UW Oshkosh email prior to class if you have any questions about the class meeting. I will send an email notice to you no later than 3:30 p.m. if there is an alternative plan for that evening s session. UW Oshkosh College of Education and Human Services EdD in Superintendency The mission of the EdD in Educational Leadership program leading to licensure as a District Administration is to develop educators to assume formal leadership roles in their organization. The goals of the program are to develop the capacity to: 1. envision and guide organizational change; 2. communicate effectively, engage constituents, develop people and build community; 3. advocate equity for diverse populations, and respect individuals; 4. integrate theory, data, research and ethical standards into the context of one s practice through continuous learning. Program Dispositions Throughout this program students will be expected to demonstrate the following dispositions: Value change as the source of the opportunity for improvement Display the ability to understand people and relationships and be receptive to the ideas of others Show a willingness to implement non-discriminatory access, accommodations and assessments. Demonstrate empathic understanding of diversity in all domains. Reflect regularly upon the philosophical assumptions, ethical principles and rationales that guide one s practice Understand oneself as a learner and value learning as a core capacity. 5

Wisconsin Administrator Standards for Superintendent (03) Licensure Teacher Standards, Vision, Instructional Program, Management, Family/Community Relations, Ethics, and Context Affecting Schools (Full documentation available at: http://tepdl.dpi.wi.gov/epp/licensure-program-guidelines) Tentative Schedule of Topics Week 1 Weeks 2, 3 & 4 Weeks 5 & 6 Week 7 Weeks 8, & 9 Weeks 10 & 11 Weeks 12 & 13 Week 14 Topics Characteristics of Effective Instruction What works in schools Local, State & National Standards Curriculum Theories: Liberal, Systematic, Existentialist, Radical, Pragmatic, Deliberative Instructional Strategies: Creating a model for understanding and recreating best practices Observational Strategies in Pk-12 Classrooms Working with district-level assessment models. Standardized tests and the role of district-level administration Working with Curriculum Directors, Professional Development Coordinators, Teacher Leaders Course wrap-up, continuing discussions Activities and Assignments Reading Assignment: TBA Small groups will read, analyze and critique research on Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement Reading Assignment: TBA Identify a specific instructional strategy you will observe and reflect upon. (Multiple observations required). Determine a model to monitor the impact the practice has on student achievement. Glatthorn TBD 6