Guidelines for assessing competence in VET

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET 5th Edition 2013

First published 2005 2 nd edition 2008 3 rd edition 2010 4 th edition 2012 5 th edition 2013 DISCLAIMER as at March 2014: A number of changes are underway within the National Training Framework, including a transition to the new Standards for Training Packages to be implemented by the end of 2015. See http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/training_packages. As the transition to the new standards will vary according to each Industry Skills Council s timeline, these publications will continue to address the content of the previous Training Package model. It is anticipated that content related to the new standards will be incorporated into the publications as they become more widely adopted. While every effort is made to maintain their accuracy, currency and usefulness, the publications are edited only once a year and may not remain current with changes implemented at state and federal level. The publications are accurate as at the date of publication shown on this page. If in doubt, please check the many websites referenced within each publication. TITLE: Guidelines for assessing competence in VET (5 th edn) 2013 ISBN 978-1-74205-723-1 Department of Training and Workforce Development, Western Australia, 2013 Reproduction of this work in whole or part for educational purposes within an educational institution and on the condition that it is not offered for sale is permitted by the Department of Training and Workforce Development. This material is available on request in appropriate alternative formats. For further information please contact: Training Sector Services 1 Prospect Place West Perth WA 6005 Telephone: +61 8 9319 5512 Facsimile: +61 8 9229 5486 Email: pd.sector.capability@dtwd.wa.gov.au Website: www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Contents Introduction...5 Section 1 Assessment policy...6 National and state assessment policies and frameworks...6 Key assessment-related policies in summary...7 Key assessment policy requirements... 11 Section 2 Introducing assessment... 17 Competence... 17 How do we know if an individual is competent?... 17 Against which standards are students assessed?... 17 What is competency based assessment?... 18 Section 3 The assessment process... 20 Introduction...20 Understanding competence and training packages... 20 Understanding the role of evidence... 24 Selecting assessment methods and assessment tools... 26 Documenting the process adequately... 31 Planning and conducting the assessment activity... 32 Section 4 Exemplar materials... 35 Part A Assessment and reporting... 35 Part B Exemplars of assessment materials... 47 Part C Assessment instruments and procedures/instructions... 63 Section 5 Resources guide... 69 Introduction...69 1. Websites providing ongoing information relevant to competency based assessment... 69 2. Resources on particular aspects of assessment... 70 3. Organisations providing information or assistance on assessment... 71 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 3

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Section 6 Useful resources... 74 Section 7 Abbreviations and glossary... 75 Abbreviations... 75 Glossary...76 4 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Introduction This publication provides practitioners and other stakeholders in the vocational education and training (VET) sector in Western Australia (WA) with information on the policies and processes involved in assessment. This information has not been referenced to specific regulatory standards; however, it is based on current standards (the Australian Quality Training Framework [AQTF] and the Standards for National VET Regulator (NVR) Registered Training Organisations [SNRs]) and reflects good practice. While the regulatory standards do not specify any particular documentation for assessment, the documents suggested in this guide reflect good practice that an RTO can consider and adopt as required. This information applies to training package qualifications and accredited courses with a vocational outcome. Always check to ensure you are using the most recent version of the AQTF training package or other materials. This publication is available in hard copy and can be downloaded from www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au. These guidelines have been written specifically for registered training organisations (RTOs) and organisations working in partnership with RTOs to provide them with clear and current information on national and state assessment policy and assessment processes. Other stakeholders such as Industry Training Councils (ITCs), group training organisations (GTOs) and employers may also find this document useful. This publication consists of the following sections: a summary of the key national and state policy requirements relevant to assessment; an introduction to competency and assessment of competence for industry and individuals new to the field; a guide to the assessment process for employers and assessors less familiar with competency based assessment; a series of exemplar materials for adaptation and use by assessors (which link to the concepts and processes in Section 3); a list of resources for assessors, including websites, organisations and materials on assessment; and a list of abbreviations used and a glossary of terms. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 5

Section 1 Assessment policy Section 1 Assessment policy This section provides a summary of the key assessment-related requirements of national and state VET policies with which RTOs must comply. National and state assessment policies and frameworks There are eight national and state policies which relate directly to assessment in VET. These policies establish the assessment requirements for RTOs operating in WA. RTOs must ensure that all staff are familiar with all national and state policies and have up-to-date copies readily available for new trainers and assessors. All assessors should ensure that they are familiar with the assessment-related aspects of these policies, which are as follows: The National Training Framework (NTF) made up of 1. the Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF); and 2. training packages Other national policies 3. the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) State policies/guidelines 4. Guidelines for assessing competence in VET (ie this publication) 5. Recognition of prior learning: An assessment resource for VET practitioners 6. Building diversity and equity in training 2010 2018: Equity is everybody s business 7. Reasonable adjustment: A guide to working with students with disability Policies for publicly funded RTOs in WA 8. VET fees and charges (current year) that apply to RTOs for training, and recognition of prior learning/current competencies (RPL/RCC) funded by the Department. A brief summary of the function of each of these policies follows, together with a website address for those RTOs which need to access copies of the policies or further information. 6 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Key assessment-related policies in summary 1. AQTF publications AQTF Essential Conditions and Standards for Continuing Registration AQTF Essential Conditions and Standards for Initial Registration AQTF Users Guide to the Essential Conditions and Standards for Continuing Registration AQTF Users Guide to the Essential Conditions and Standards for Initial Registration Key function To provide consistent and continuously improve quality assurance and recognition mechanisms for VET across Australia, based on a quality-assured approach to the registration of training organisations seeking to deliver training, assess competence and issue nationally recognised qualifications. Assessment aspects These publications outline the requirements for delivery and assessment of nationally recognised training. Further information www.nssc.natese.gov.au/vet_standards 2. Training packages Key function To provide a set of nationally endorsed standards and qualifications (used to recognise and assess the skills and knowledge individuals need to perform effectively in the workplace). Training packages are key resources for RTOs in the delivery of structured, nationally recognised training and assessment. A training package states which competencies need to be achieved, but does not prescribe how an individual should be trained. It is the responsibility of the RTO, through its trainers and assessors, to develop teaching strategies and assessment methods to meet the needs, abilities and circumstances of students. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 7

Section 1 Assessment policy Assessment aspects The key assessment-related aspects of training packages are as follows. Endorsed components national competency standards; national qualifi cations; and assessment guidelines. There can also be related support materials which are not endorsed but may be noted by the National Skills Standards Council (NSSC) if they meet specified quality requirements. Support materials may include: learning strategies; assessment resources; and professional development materials. Further information www.training.gov.au 3. Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) Key function To provide a unified system of national qualifications for schools, VET providers and the higher education sector. Assessment aspects The framework specifies the characteristics of learning outcomes at each qualifi cation level and explains the responsibilities for assessment and certification. Further information www.aqf.edu.au 4. Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Key function To provide a working document for trainers and assessors to help them offer quality assessment services. Assessment aspects Assessment practices for RTOs are explained in these guidelines. 8 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Further information Go to www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au. 5. Recognition of prior learning: An assessment resource for VET practitioners Key function To achieve consistent, high-quality provision of RPL services for VET in WA. Assessment aspects RPL is an assessment method designed to confirm and recognise the competencies an individual has obtained outside a formal education and training environment. These competencies might have been gained through informal or non-formal training, or they may have been gained through life or work experience. Further information Go to www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au. 6. Building diversity and equity in training 2010 2018: Equity is everybody s business Key function To create a training sector which is capable of meeting the diverse learning needs of all Western Australians and gives due regard to differences in gender, ability, age, location, and social and cultural backgrounds. Assessment aspects To provide assistance on how assessment can address diversity, equity and access issues. Further information http://vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au/vetpolicyandguidelines/pages/accessandparticipation. aspx 7. Reasonable adjustment: A guide to working with students with disability Key function A practical guide for assessors to ensure students with disability have the best opportunity to have their competencies accurately recognised. Assessment aspects The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA) requires RTOs to customise their services including making reasonable adjustment to the provision of assessment services to facilitate the successful participation of people with disability in education, training and employment. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 9

Section 1 Assessment policy The guide clarifies the concept of reasonable adjustment and helps assessors to respond creatively to the individual challenges faced by students with disability while ensuring both a valid and reliable assessment. Go to www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au. 8. Current VET fees and charges policy for publicly funded RTOs in Western Australia Key function To set out the statutory and provider-based fees and charges which apply to training and assessment funded by the Department. Assessment aspects The policy provides information for publicly funded RTOs relating to the fees and charges applied to clients. The VET fees and charges in 2012 policy can be located using the search function at www.trainingwa.wa.gov.au. 10 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Key assessment policy requirements Key assessment policy requirements for RTOs are summarised under the following 14 headings. 1. Assessment benchmarks Endorsed industry/enterprise competency standards form the benchmarks for assessment. Competency standards comprise units of competency contained in training packages or accredited courses. Assessment guidelines within endorsed training packages provide the framework for assessment of the units of competency for the relevant industry or enterprise. All assessors must be familiar with the full content of competency standards and training packages against which they assess. 2. National recognition National recognition is a feature of the AQTF which allows an RTO that is registered in one state or territory to operate in another without having to undergo a further registration process. Qualifications and statements of attainment issued by any RTO are to be accepted and recognised by all other RTOs. (This was previously referred to as mutual recognition.) As part of the national recognition obligation, RTOs must have appropriate credit transfer arrangements. Credit transfer is an arrangement where a standard level of credit or formal recognition is given to an individual who has previously achieved competence in a training or education environment. 3. RPL The Australian Qualifi cations Framework, First Edition July 2011 defines recognition of prior learning (RPL) as: an assessment process that involves assessment of an individual s relevant prior learning (including formal, informal and non-formal learning) to determine the credit outcomes of an individual application for credit. Reproduced with the permission of the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. 4. Qualified assessors RTO staff must be competent at the functions they perform in relation to training and assessment. The RTO must be able to demonstrate that trainers and assessors have the required competencies for the work they undertake, as well as evidence of how assessors maintain relevant industry experience. The NSSC has determined that as of 1 July 2013, trainers must be able to demonstrate: vocational competencies at least to the level being delivered and assessed; how they are maintaining industry currency and their competence, and how they are continuing to develop their VET skills and knowledge; and that they have the minimum qualification the TAE40110 Certificate IV in Training and Assessment or are able to demonstrate equivalent competencies. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 11

Section 1 Assessment policy Assessors must be able to demonstrate: their industry currency and vocational competencies at least to the level being delivered and assessed; how they are continuing to develop their VET knowledge and skills, and maintain their industry currency and competence as an assessor; and that they hold the TAE Assessor Skill Set or equivalence of competencies. For more information, including on persons delivering training under supervision, go to www.nssc.natese.gov.au/news_and_events and select NSSC Communiqué 3 December 2011. 5. Informing clients Information on assessment procedures, appeals procedures and RPL arrangements, including fees and charges and any support services need to be provided to clients before enrolment. The RTO s marketing and advertising identify training and assessment services that lead to an AQF qualification or statement of attainment (within their scope of registration) separately from any other training or assessment services (such as community education). 6. Fees RTOs need to ensure that they have fair and reasonable fees, and refund policies for all modes of training delivery and assessment. Information on these policies may be provided to clients, before enrolment, in clear and accessible language and through a range of methods, eg website information, fliers, advertising material, information sessions. 7. Delivery to overseas students If RTOs are involved in the delivery of training and assessment services to overseas clients, they must also comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS). The Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) is the national regulator for Australia s VET sector. This government authority regulates courses and training providers to ensure that nationally approved quality standards are met. Western Australian RTOs which deliver courses interstate or overseas are required to register with ASQA. Go to www.asqa.gov.au. 8. Assessment plans RTOs should ensure that assessment plans are developed and provided to all students before their assessment. Students may appeal if they believe that the assessment has not been carried out in accordance with the assessment plan. In the event of an appeal by the student, the assessment plan will be a key source document. 12 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Workplace-based assessment must be negotiated between the RTO, the employer and the student. The RTO must ensure that any assessments occurring in the workplace are conducted in an environment with the appropriate facilities. (See 3. Workplace assessment checklist in Part B of Section 4.) 9. Principles of assessment Assessment principles state that assessments must be valid, reliable, flexible and fair. Assessors must ensure that assessment decisions involve the evaluation of sufficient evidence to enable a judgement to be made on the student s competence. Validity refers to the extent to which the interpretation and use of an assessment outcome can be supported by evidence. An assessment is valid if the assessment methods and materials reflect the elements, performance criteria and critical aspects of evidence in the evidence guide of the unit(s) of competency, and if the assessment outcome is fully supported by the evidence gathered. Reliability refers to the degree of consistency and accuracy of the assessment outcomes; that is, the extent to which the assessment provides similar outcomes for students with equal competence at different times or places, regardless of the assessor conducting the assessment. If assessments are both valid and reliable, then they should be consistent across RTOs as well as within an RTO. Reliable and valid assessments share a number of characteristics, including: assessing all four dimensions of competency; using a process which integrates required knowledge and skills with their practical application for a workplace task, ie holistic assessment; being based on evidence gathered on a number of occasions and in a range of contexts; covering both on-the-job and off-the-job components of training; and providing for the recognition of competencies no matter how or when they have been acquired. Flexibility refers to the opportunity for students to negotiate certain aspects of their assessment, eg timing, with their assessor. All students should be fully informed (through the assessment plan) of the purpose of assessment, the assessment criteria, the methods and tools used, and the context and timing of the assessment. Fair assessment does not advantage or disadvantage particular students or groups of students. This may mean that assessment methods are adjusted for particular students (such as those with disabilities or cultural differences) to ensure that the methods do not disadvantage them because of their situation. An assessment should not place unnecessary demands on students which may prevent them from demonstrating competence. For example, an assessment should not demand a higher level of English language or literacy than that required to perform to the workplace standard outlined in the competencies being assessed. (See 1. Checklist for principles of assessment validity, reliability, flexibility and fairness in Part B of Section 4.) Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 13

Section 1 Assessment policy There are legislative requirements that the principle of reasonable adjustment be applied in the design of assessments. The assessment process should not prevent any persons from demonstrating their competence, skills or knowledge because the design of the assessment failed to take account of their limitations. Refer to the Department s 2013 publication Reasonable adjustment: A guide to working with students with disability. Assessment materials must also: comply with the relevant training package assessment guidelines; provide for holistic assessment, ie use a process that integrates knowledge and skills with their practical application in a workplace task; cover all four dimensions of competency; target the correct qualifi cation level; cover relevant employability skills facets; and be able to be customised. (See 1. Checklist for principles of assessment validity, reliability, flexibility and fairness in Part B of Section 4.) 10. Equity RTOs need to ensure that access and equity principles are used in assessment as well as in training. The following guiding principles of the Building diversity and equity in training 2010 2018: Equity is everybody s business policy should be adhered to. Substantive equality in training Within the training sector, some individuals need to be treated differently in order to provide them with equality of access with the potential for equal outcomes. Explicit recognition and response Explicit consideration and incorporation of the needs of individuals and communities must occur within the design, funding and evaluation of programs and delivery of services to maximise outcomes for individuals and to provide transparency and accountability. Accessible learning and career pathways Pathways in and out at different points in the learning continuum and lifespan must exist to facilitate personal, educational, training and employment transitions. Engagement through promotion Training opportunities must be presented in a way that allows priority groups to be aware of available opportunities and assure them of their capability to participate. As well as meeting the requirements specified in the relevant training packages, assessment methods and materials should be holistic, fair and flexible. They should not include any language, literacy or numeracy requirements at levels greater than those outlined in the competency standards being assessed. Strategies for supporting and assessing workplace, distance and online students may be developed, implemented and reviewed to ensure continuous improvement. (See 4. Assessment planning checklists in Part B of Section 4.) 14 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET 11. Reporting and recording results It is the responsibility of the assessor to keep a record of the evidence presented by the student which enables the assessment decision to be made. Qualifications and statements of attainment must identify the units of competency the student has attained, as well as meeting the other requirements noted in the 2011 first edition of the Australian Qualifi cations Framework. Qualifications and statements of attainment can be issued only for areas within the scope of delivery of the RTO. Logos must be used in accordance with the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science, Research and Tertiary Education (DIISRTE) Nationally Recognised Training (NRT) logo specifications when issuing qualifications or statements of attainment and when marketing or advertising the training and assessment activities of the RTO. RTOs in WA must also comply with the guidelines for the use of the Training Accreditation Council (TAC) logo. 12. Student feedback and appeals processes RTOs should ensure that students are provided with feedback that includes details of the assessment outcome, the reasons for the outcome, recommendations for further training, and the appeal and reassessment options. RTOs should have an appeals process in place which allows students to challenge the assessment decision and be reassessed. A reasonable, non-refundable fee may be charged by the RTO to discourage frivolous appeals but it should not be so high that it prohibits appeals altogether. It is the responsibility of the assessor undertaking the assessment to ensure that, in the event of an appeal, the evidence is kept in sufficient detail to enable an assessment decision to be reviewed. This could involve keeping a summary of the evidence presented by the student. (See 4. Evidence requirements in Part A of Section 4.) 13. Continuous improvement and documentation Assessment systems, like all other aspects of RTO operations, should incorporate ongoing monitoring and improvement processes. In particular, RTOs should develop processes to enhance the consistency of assessments, such as assessor moderation forums, consultation with industry, and professional development for assessors. Moderation forums should involve a range of assessors and other stakeholders. Recommendations and actions taken may be documented. These processes should be linked to the organisation s review processes, such as an internal audit. RTOs assessment processes should include quality assurance procedures for assessment processes and instruments. These processes should be comprehensive and up-to-date. (See the Department s 2013 publication A guide to continuous improvement of assessment in VET.) Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 15

Section 1 Assessment policy Processes to ensure the currency of accredited course documents, training packages and learning and assessment materials need to be implemented and all materials need to be evaluated on a regular basis. RTOs should develop learning and assessment strategies which clearly detail the core/elective units of competency being assessed, the client target group, the delivery and assessment modes, pathways, customisation of assessments and assessment validation processes. This should be done for each qualification, skill set or single unit of competency listed on the RTOs scope, where full qualifications are not offered. 14. Policy compliance for publicly funded RTOs Publicly funded RTOs must comply with relevant policies. 16 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Section 2 Introducing assessment This section provides an introduction to assessment specifically assessment of competence for employers and students, and those new to the field. Competence In VET, individuals are considered competent when they are able to consistently apply their knowledge and skills to the standard of performance required in the workplace. Both workplace and off-the-job training and assessment aim to ensure that individuals participating in the training have the competence to undertake their work role to the standard expected in a range of employment situations. How do we know if an individual is competent? We know whether an individual is competent after they have completed an assessment that verifies that all aspects of the unit of competency are held and can be applied in an industry context. Just as learner drivers must demonstrate that they can drive a car by actually taking the examiner for a drive, so too must students demonstrate competence by undergoing an assessment process. Assessment may involve a variety of assessment methods. Individuals can be assessed during their training, at the end of their training, or without even undertaking any training, eg if they believe that they are already competent. Those being assessed are often called students. The method and timing of assessment will vary depending upon the assessor, the student and the competency being assessed. Against which standards are students assessed? Students are judged against competency standards (often called benchmarks) developed by industry to assess whether they are competent. A competency standard comprises individual units of competency that include the essential information needed to assess a student. Some enterprises have developed specific competency standards for their businesses and in some cases these have been nationally endorsed in enterprise training packages or used in state accredited courses. To gain a formal qualification, eg a Certificate II or a Diploma, individuals have to be competent in a specified group of units of competency. Information on the qualifications and relevant units of competency are outlined in accredited courses or training packages. Training packages consist of competency standards, information on qualifi cations and assessment guidelines to help trainers and assessors. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 17

Section 2 Introducing assessment What is competency based assessment? This is the process of collecting evidence and making judgements on whether competence has been achieved. This confirms that an individual can perform to the standard expected in the workplace as expressed in the nationally endorsed competency standards (where they exist), on competency standards developed by relevant industry, enterprise, community or professional groups, or on outcomes of accredited courses if there are no relevant nationally endorsed competency standards. What sort of evidence is collected? Evidence collected may be direct, such as observation of workplace performance, indirect, such as formal testing, or supplementary, such as references from employers. Evidence is used by an assessor to make a judgement about whether a student is competent. It is the responsibility of the assessor to determine what and how much evidence is required to make the assessment judgement. Training packages provide guidance on the types of evidence required, and further advice may be gained through moderation and industry consultation. What training do assessors have? All assessors must have demonstrated their competence in the particular competency standards being assessed and in the assessor s requirements set out in the regulatory standards and as determined by the NSSC. (See Communiqué 3 December 2011, at http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/news_and_events.) Assessments for nationally recognised vocational qualifications must be undertaken by an assessor working for an RTO or an assessor working in partnership with an RTO. An RTO is the only body with the authority to issue a qualification or statement of attainment. What about students who believe that they are already competent? If students believe that they are already competent, they can choose one of two forms of assessment. The first is known as recognition of prior learning (RPL) and the second which they may have to undergo if, for licensing purposes, they have to confirm retention of competence is called recognition of current competencies (RCC). Both of these assessment processes can lead to the issuing of a qualification or a statement of attainment, or to credit transfer into a training program. The following definition of recognition of prior learning (RPL) is taken from the Training Package Development Handbook. RPL is an assessment process that involves assessment of an individual s relevant prior learning (including formal, informal and non-formal learning) to determine the credit outcomes of an individual application for credit. Reproduced with the permission of the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. 18 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET RPL is the term used to describe a number of assessment processes that formally recognise the competencies an individual has acquired through formal or non-formal learning, work experience and/or life experience. The principles and processes involved in RPL are consistent with other forms of assessment. What results do students get? After students have undergone assessment, they are deemed either competent or not yet competent in each unit of competency assessed. If they are deemed competent, they will be issued with either a statement of attainment listing the units of competency in which they are competent (which may be designated in the training package as a skill set with recommended titling) or a full qualification (where this is achieved). If they are deemed not yet competent in any units of competency, they will be given feedback on their performance and provided with guidance on future options. All students have the opportunity to appeal their results and, if necessary, be reassessed. What do all the training and assessment terms mean? Training and assessment is a field involving a high level of knowledge and expertise. Like all areas involving technical expertise, the training system involves some specific terminology. A glossary of terms is provided at the back of this publication to help you understand the most common training and assessment terms. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 19

Section 3 The assessment process Section 3 The assessment process Introduction This section is for assessors, particularly those less experienced in competency based assessment, and for employers who wish to understand more about the assessment process. It is not intended to provide all the information an assessor needs, but rather an introduction to some of the key processes and documents to consider when planning and conducting assessments. Assessors who require more information or resources should refer to Sections 4 and 5 of this publication and the Department s 2013 publication Designing assessment tools for quality outcomes in VET. Figure 1 shows the key issues covered in this section which lead to the planning and conducting of an assessment activity. Understanding competency and training packages Understanding the role of evidence Selecting assessment methods Planning and conducting the assessment Having confidence in the assessment decision Documenting the process adequately Figure 1: Issues covered in this section Understanding competence and training packages Individuals are considered competent when they are able to consistently apply their knowledge and skills to the standard of performance required in the workplace. According to VET Products for the 21 st Century Final Report of the Joint Steering Committee of the NQC and the COAG Skills and Workforce Development Subgroup June 2009, competency embodies the ability to transfer and apply skills and knowledge to new situations and environments. The report recommends that the following concepts be added into the definition of competency. It is demonstrated to the standards required in the workplace. It comprises the application of specified skills and knowledge relevant to that occupation. 20 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET It makes appropriate reference to required generic and employability skills. It covers all aspects of workplace performance. It can be demonstrated consistently over time, and covers a sufficient range of experiences (including those in simulated or institutional environments). Reproduced under Assessment is the process of collecting evidence and making judgements on whether competence has been achieved. This confirms that an individual can perform to the standard expected in the workplace as expressed in the nationally endorsed competency standards (where they exist), on competency standards developed by relevant industry, enterprise, community or professional groups, or on outcomes of accredited courses if there are no relevant nationally endorsed competency standards. Competency comprises the following four dimensions: task skills the capacity to perform tasks to the required standard; task management skills the ability to plan and integrate a number of different tasks and achieve a work outcome; contingency management skills the ability to respond to irregularities, breakdowns and other unanticipated occurrences; and job/role environment skills the capacity to deal with the responsibilities and expectations of the work environment, including working with others. (See 1. Four dimensions of competency in Part A of Section 4.) It is important that all four dimensions of competency are assessed within the context of the required performance. Assessments will be based on competency standards from a relevant training package or accredited course. Training packages are developed by industry to meet the identifiable training needs of specific industries or industry sectors. Figure 2 shows the different components of training packages. Endorsed components Competency standards Qualifications Assessment guidelines Support materials (may be noted by the National Quality Council [NQC] by meeting quality requirements) Learning standards Assessment materials Professional development materials Figure 2: Components of training packages Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 21

Section 3 The assessment process Units of competency are developed using a consistent format in all training packages. The components of a unit of competency and its content are set out in Figure 3. Component Unit title and code Unit descriptor Employability skills Prerequisite or co-requisite units Application of the unit Competency field Unit sector Elements of competency Performance criteria Required skills and knowledge Range statement Evidence guide Content Defines the general area of competency and national reference code. Clarifies the purpose of unit. Indicates that the unit contains embedded employability skills*. Identifies other units of competency that must be achieved before or in conjunction with the unit. A brief description of how the unit is practically applied in the industry. Specifies a specialist area of industry to which the unit belongs. A category used to group units within a training package. Outcomes that contribute to the overall unit, ie building blocks of the unit expressed in outcome terms. Statements for each element expressing what workplace activity is to be done and the required level of performance. The broad underpinning skills, and specialist and general knowledge necessary for competent performance. The range of contexts and conditions within which the work is to be performed, and detailed information on terminology and requirements set out in the performance criteria. Helps with the interpretation and assessment of the unit and contains: an overview of assessment in the industry context; critical aspects to be considered for assessment and the evidence required to demonstrate competence; the context of, and any specific resources required for, assessment; suggested methods of assessment; any further guidance information for assessment; and access and equity considerations where relevant. Figure 3: Components of units of competency *Training packages not reviewed since 2004 will identify the superseded key competencies (also known as Mayer key competencies) in each unit of competency and not embedded employability skills. The key competencies are employment-related general competencies essential for effective participation in the workplace. The three outcome levels of the key competencies do not equate to the AQF levels. In general terms, Level 1 key competencies are required to undertake work activities, Level 2 is required to manage work activities and Level 3 to evaluate and reshape work activities. 22 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET When conducting the assessment, all the components of the competency standard must be considered. Assessment guidelines provide the overall framework for the assessment of competency standards and qualifications in the training package. They cover assessment systems, pathways, assessor s qualifications, the design of assessment resources and the conduct of assessments. Issues of RPL are covered under this section in the assessment pathways material. Most training packages offer a range of qualifications which may vary in AQF outcome, their degree of specialisation and the extent to which customisation is permissible. Most qualifications are made up of identified core (sometimes referred to as mandatory ) units of competency and elective units of competency. Many qualifi cations provide fl exibility by allowing some elective units to be substituted with units from other training packages. Units of competency can also be contextualised to suit particular job roles or work environments. The training package specifies the degree of unit of competency contextualisation that can occur. In considering the training, delivery and assessment, trainers may want to cluster certain units of competency so that they can cover all relevant knowledge and skills required for a workplace task while maintaining the integrity of the outcome of each unit. These clusters of competencies can then be assessed together. Identified skill sets can also indicate appropriate unit clustering. The AQF includes descriptors for each qualification level. These descriptors provide guidelines for reasonable performance at a particular level. These descriptors, along with the elements, performance criteria and evidence guides in units of competency help assessors to gauge a reasonable range and level of performance to expect from a competent student. Training package support materials (non-endorsed components) may include assessment materials such as exemplar assessment materials, the range of assessment methods to be used or targeted assessment resources for specific groups. RTOs are required to ensure that the assessment materials they use meet the needs of their client groups and the unit(s) of competency. (For information on resource materials, see Section 5 Resources guide.) Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 23

Section 3 The assessment process Understanding the role of evidence Evidence is the information gathered which, when matched against the requirements of the unit of competency, provides proof of competence. Evidence can take many forms and be gathered from a number of sources. Evidence can be direct, indirect or supplementary, as noted in Figure 4. Types of evidence Direct, for example: direct observation; oral questioning; and demonstration of specifi c skills. Indirect, for example: assessment of qualities of a final product; review of previous work undertaken; and written tests of underpinning knowledge. Figure 4: Different types of evidence Supplementary, for example: testimonials from employers; reports from supervisors; work diary or logbook; and examples of reports or work documents. No single form of evidence is better than another. Quality evidence is chosen appropriately for the student and context, and meets the four rules of evidence noted in Figure 5. Rules of evidence Valid Sufficient Current Authentic Relates to the unit(s) of competency appropriately. Reflects all four dimensions of competency. Provides evidence of employability skills. Is appropriate to the AQF alignment being assessed. Provides enough evidence to make a judgement about the competence of the individual in relation to all four dimensions of competency. Meets all the evidence requirements for the unit of competency. Is recent enough to show that the skills and knowledge are still able to be applied to a current work situation. Is the student s own work (and procedures have been developed to ensure this). Figure 5: Rules of evidence 24 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET There are many potential sources of evidence and lots of methods and techniques for gathering evidence. Figure 6 provides a sample of the assessment methods with examples. (See Part B Exemplars of assessment materials in Section 4.) Assessment methods Observation Questioning Review of products Portfolio Supplementary feedback Structured activities Example Real work activities at workplace Self-evaluation form Interview Written questionnaire Work samples/products Testimonials/references Work samples/products Training record Assessment record Journal/work diary/logbook Life experience information Interviews with, or documentation from employer, supervisor, peers Project Presentation Demonstration Progressive tasks Simulation exercise such as role-plays Figure 6: Assessment methods A summary of the evidence presented by the student should be kept by the assessor in the event of an appeal. It is the responsibility of the RTO to establish guidelines for assessors on the minimum evidence recording requirements. Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 25

Section 3 The assessment process Selecting assessment methods and assessment tools Figure 7 outlines a process for selecting assessment methods to gather appropriate evidence. Identify unit(s) of competency to cluster for assessment. Develop competency profile. Identify evidence requirements. Review and select assessment methods. Select assessment tools and record evidence matrix. Develop assessment plan. Clustering Figure 7: Process used to determine assessment methods Real work does not usually fall into categories that reflect individual units of competency. In general, a real work activity draws on a number of units of competency at the one time. A good assessment task may involve clustering a number of competencies to reflect a real work task or particular job role (see 2. Clustering units of competency for assessment in Part A of Section 4). The degree to which a number of units can be clustered together to reflect a real work activity will vary across all training packages. Training packages can contain skill sets identifying groups of units of competency that meet specific work roles or regulated/licensed activities which may be clustered for good practice assessment. Clustering should take account of the work activity, the assessment context, the training and assessment arrangements for the qualification, and the time, resources, facility and personnel available. Assessors are required to have a thorough knowledge of the training package they are working with and the relevant workplace environment. Appropriate clustering is a key way to ensure that assessments are holistic in that the assessor can gather evidence and cross-reference it across a number of units of competency. Clustering, where appropriate, may also result in reducing the time and cost of assessment. 26 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013

Guidelines for assessing competence in VET Competency profile Once the units of competency have been identified, the next stage is the development of a competency profile (see 3. Competency profile in Part B of Section 4). A competency profile will provide an overall picture of a competent person in action. It can be a checklist, a written description of the work activity, a list of the characteristics of a competent worker or a job description for an individual performing the activity. To develop a competency profile, the assessor must draw together the information in the unit(s) of competency, the AQF descriptor and the employability skills facets identifi ed in the qualification. Evidence required The next step is to identify the evidence required to determine competence. The evidence selected must reflect the skills, knowledge and language encompassed in the competency profile, and comply with the four rules of evidence; that is, it must be valid, sufficient, current and authentic. The evidence guide in the unit of competency has detailed information that can be used to develop a list of evidence requirements. Assessment methods The list of evidence requirements is used by the assessor to review the possible assessment methods; that is, the ways in which the evidence can be collected to demonstrate satisfactory performance. In identifying the assessment methods, resources and facilities required for the assessment should be considered, including any workplace simulation requirements. (Refer to the Department s 2013 publication Designing assessment tools for quality outcomes in VET.) Selecting the appropriate assessment methods will involve consideration of the student s needs, the nature of the work activity being assessed, the location of the assessment (to ensure a safe and accessible environment) and the requirements of the training package. Reasonable adjustment It is at this stage that issues of reasonable adjustment for students needs should be considered. For example, a student may have a disability which prevents them from undertaking certain activities or performing in standard ways, but they may still be competent in the unit(s) of competency being assessed. In this instance, reasonable adjustments should be made to the assessment activity to ensure that the student still has the opportunity to demonstrate the competencies being assessed. (Reasonable adjustment is discussed in the Department s 2013 publications Troubleshooting guide: Assessment in VET and Reasonable adjustment: A guide to working with students with disability.) Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013 27

Section 3 The assessment process Provided that quality and sufficient evidence can still be collected for the assessment decision to be made, it is acceptable to adapt the assessment methods to refl ect the student s needs and situation. (See 5. Guidelines for assessing distance students and 6. Checklist for special needs of students in Part B of Section 4.) Assessment tools Once the method has been selected, the materials for collecting and analysing the evidence are then chosen or designed. These materials are called assessment tools. In general, the term assessment tool is used to describe a document that contains both the instrument and the instructions for gathering and interpreting evidence. Instruments are the specific questions or activities developed from the selected assessment method(s) to be used for the assessment. (A profile of acceptable performance and the decision-making rules for the assessor may also be included.) Procedures include the information/instructions given to the student and/or the assessor regarding the conditions under which the assessment is to be conducted and recorded. For example, if the evidence-gathering technique being used is a workplace observation followed by a brief interview, then the assessment tool might consist of: instructions identifying the activities to be undertaken by the student, the key points to be observed and the performance issues to be considered by the assessor; and a proforma which includes a checklist for the key observation points and decision criteria, and a series of questions and a checklist for responses on required knowledge for the interview. Other assessment materials might include information on projects, case studies, simulation activities, checklists for third-party evidence, self-evaluation forms or portfolio requirements. (See Part C Assessment instruments and procedures/instructions in Section 4 and refer to the Department s 2013 publication Designing assessment tools for quality outcomes in VET.) All assessment materials should be flexible, fair, safe and cost-effective. (See Part B Exemplars of assessment materials in Section 4 and refer to the Department s 2012 publication Reasonable adjustment: A guide to working with students with disability.) Assessment strategies and tools need to be developed in consultation with industry and tested on an appropriate sample of students if possible or reviewed before use. Evidence matrix Once assessment methods and tools have been selected, it may be useful to do a mapping exercise to ensure that all the evidence gathered through these tools will meet the critical and mandated requirements of the unit(s) of competency. This is called an evidence matrix and the mapping, if done accurately, will help assessors to ensure that evidence collected will be valid and sufficient. 28 Department of Training and Workforce Development 2013