Espionage and Intelligence. Debra A. Miller, Book Editor



Similar documents
US Intelligence Community Thomas Patrick Carroll 1

Foreign Affairs and National Security

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

Note: This compilation of the National Security Act of 1947 reflects amendments enacted into law through Public Law (August 3, 2007).

Confrontation or Collaboration?

POTOMAC INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES. Revolution in Intelligence Affairs: Transforming Intelligence for Emerging Challenges

Alaska Elevation Data Collection Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee

OVERVIEW OF THE ADMINISTRATION S FY 2005 REQUEST FOR HOMELAND SECURITY By Steven M. Kosiak

One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America

o n H o m e l a n d S e c u r i t y

Brief Documentary History of the Department of Homeland Security

TESTIMONY OF ZOË BAIRD, PRESIDENT, MARKLE FOUNDATION CHAIRMAN, TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE

Counterintelligence Awareness Glossary

BGS Managing Director Michael Allen s Book, Blinking Red, is Reviewed By The Center for the Study of Intelligence

INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS

The Need to Share: The U.S. Intelligence Community and Law Enforcement

Chapter 18 Practice Exam

The Senior Executive s Role in Cybersecurity. By: Andrew Serwin and Ron Plesco.


Intelligence Analysis for Homeland Security RPAD 557

The War on Terror in Classrooms and Clinics: An Inventory

HOW THE US GOVERNMENT WORKS HOW THE US SECURITY AGENCIES WORK. by Allan B. Cobb. Core Library

HOMELAND SECURITY INTELLIGENCE RPAD 556

GAO COMBATING TERRORISM. Observations on Options to Improve the Federal Response. Testimony

Guide to Graduate Programs. Master of Arts Degrees Certificates of Graduate Study

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

Introduction to Special Edition on University Nonproliferation Education and Training

JOHN DAVIDSON WOODWARD, JR.

The National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States

CRS Report for Congress

H. R SEC DIRECTORATE FOR INFORMATION ANALYSIS AND INFRA STRUCTURE PROTECTION.

Confrontation or Collaboration?

An Overview of Large US Military Cybersecurity Organizations

Bureau of Industry and Security

National Security Adjudicator Training Program

ADDRESS 001 UNITED STATES SENATE 002 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 003 COMMISSION SECURITY & COOPERATION IN EUROPE 006 U.S. CAPITOL POLICE+D32

Dear Delegates, It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 Montessori Model United Nations Conference.

Earn a Bachelor or Master of Science Degree (BS/MS) in Intelligence Management at Henley-Putnam, a Leader in Intelligence Studies Education

Confrontation or Collaboration?

Guideline for Identifying an Information System as a National Security System

Counterterrorism and Cybersecurity

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE INFORMATION SHARING ENVIRONMENT (ISE)

Table of Contents. Tab 3: Requirements, Planning, and Direction What Intelligence Can (and Cannot) Do...39 Who Uses U.S. Intelligence?...

CBO. Federal Funding for Homeland Security: An Update. What Is Homeland Security?

Appendix -- Homeland Security Mission Funding by Agency and Budget Account (budget authority in millions of dollars)

Course Principles of GPA. Unit III Implementation of the Three Branches of Government

The Role of Intelligence

The National Security Policy Process: The National Security Council and Interagency System

working group on foreign policy and grand strategy

News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century

FUNDING FOR DEFENSE, MILITARY OPERATIONS, HOMELAND SECURITY, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES SINCE

INTELLIGENCE: PRACTICES, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS. Syllabus , Spring 2006 R. Vickers, B. Posen Thursday, 10:30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Issue Paper. Wargaming Homeland Security and Army Reserve Component Issues. By Professor Michael Pasquarett

JOSEPH E. BAILER Curriculum Vita

Application of Technology to Create an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Approach to Safe and Secure Ports

The main object of my research is :

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION COORDINATOR PROGRAM

Subject: Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2.4 OVERCOME GLOBAL SECURITY CHALLENGES THROUGH DIPLOMATIC ENGAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION

December 17, 2003 Homeland Security Presidential Directive/Hspd-7

Threat Intelligence: Friend of the Enterprise

WORLD WAR 2 Political and economic conditions in Europe and throughout the world after World War 1 led directly to World War 2:

Research Note Engaging in Cyber Warfare

U.S. DoD Physical Security Market

Three Branches of Government. Lesson 2

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT)

Challenging the Red Line between Intelligence and Policy

Subject: National Preparedness

Home Security: Russia s Challenges

ANSER and AMERICAN MILITARY UNIVERSITY. Homeland Security Education

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

United States Counterintelligence

SUMMARY OF KEY SECTIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001 By Richard Horowitz, Esq.

QUICKSTART RULES Turn Order Rolling Dice 10s Damage Number Caps

Keynote: FBI Wednesday, February 4 noon 1:10 p.m.

Department of Homeland Security Information Sharing Strategy

Intelligence as a Career

Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-5 1

Emerging Threats and Challenges for Homeland Air Security

20, Service on Feb. 20, 1994.

Report to Congress on The Role of the Department of Defense in Supporting Homeland Security. September 2003

The Crisis Management System in Germany

Insider s Guide to Careers in Intelligence Analysis. hosted by Tom Hunter, MA, M.Litt. (Former DIA Senior Intelligence Analyst)

Transcription:

Espionage and Intelligence Debra A. Miller, Book Editor

Intelligence... has always been used by the United States to support U.S. military operations, but much of what forms today s intelligence system was not created until after the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Intelligence information needed by the president and policy makers to conduct foreign policy and protect the United States from its enemies has always been used by the United States to support U.S. military operations, but much of what forms today s intelligence system was not created until after the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The surprise attack revealed major flaws in U.S. intelligence capabilities, brought the United States into World War II, and spurred the United States to develop a much larger and more coordinated intelligence community. Indeed, even during the war, the United States moved to improve its intelligence system. The army, navy, and marines each conducted intelligence operations, and the United States created the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) under the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a military advisory group, to analyze all national security information. All of these intelligence efforts were successful during the war, producing critical intelligence that helped America win the conflict. After the war, President Harry S. Truman closed down the OSS, but the Soviet Union s postwar decision to expand its influence in Europe caused him to rethink the need for intelligence. Numerous independent and congressional investigations recommended a variety of approaches to intelligence. One of the major issues considered was whether the military should retain control of intelligence or whether a civilian intelligence agency should be created. 16

The end result of these investigations was the passing of the National Security Act of 1947, a law that created the framework for today s national security and intelligence system. Under the act, a civilian Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), headed by a director of central intelligence, was established to handle all national intelligence gathering and to advise the president. In addition, a National Security Council (NSC) was created to coordinate national security policy; the army, the navy, and the newly created air force were unified under a new cabinet position, the secretary of defense; and the Joint Chiefs of Staff were charged solely with providing military advice to the president and the secretary of defense. This CIA-run intelligence system became one of the key features of the Cold War the decades-long period of tension and threats between the United States and the Soviet Union that ended only with the economic and political collapse of the latter in 1991. During the Cold War, all of the CIA s operations were designed to counteract Soviet activities that U.S. officials believed constituted a threat to the United States and world security. As a result, the CIA focused on sending spies to various locations to extract secrets about the Soviet military buildup and on protecting the U.S. military establishment from Soviet espionage efforts. This period also witnessed a large escalation in the use of satellites and other technological devices for detecting Soviet military intentions and activities. Many intelligence analysts and employees became experts on the Soviet Union, with little knowledge of other parts of the world. When the Cold War ended, however, this intelligence system suddenly seemed obsolete. The system s failure to predict or prevent the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, together with the lack of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) found in Iraq after the George W. Bush administration used the threat of WMDs as the underpinning for the Iraq war, led to calls for intelligence reform. These events caused many policy makers and intelligence experts to conclude that the 17

Espionage and Intelligence U.S. intelligence community was not properly configured to develop accurate information about terrorism, nuclear weapons proliferation, and other modern threats. This conclusion was bolstered by the findings of two independent commissions created by the government the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (the 9/11 Commission ) and the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (the WMD Commission ). In 2004, Congress passed legislation that, together with some previous reforms, provided for a series of major changes in the organization of the U.S. intelligence system. Today s U.S. intelligence community is composed of a group of sixteen federal agencies and organizations under the control of the executive branch. The CIA continues to be a principal intelligence agency, together with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), two components of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and a growing number of intelligence entities within the Department of Defense (such as the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)). Recent reforms, however, created the position of Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to oversee all intelligence activities throughout the government, taking this responsibility away from the director of the CIA. Reforms also added the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to the list of intelligence agencies, and established two new national centers the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) and the Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control Center (WINPAC) to encourage collaboration among intelligence agencies on these specific national security concerns. As these reforms suggest, the work of the intelligence community now includes collecting information not only on the activities of foreign governments and their agents, but also on weapons proliferation around the globe, international narcotics activities, and potential terrorist threats. 18

Making this transition into the twenty-first century of intelligence gathering is the focus of many of the selections in Current Controversies: Espionage and Intelligence. The authors in this volume discuss a variety of issues, including the severity and nature of the intelligence failures relating to 9/11 and Iraq, the effectiveness of recent reforms, and suggestions for additional improvements. In addition, authors provide their perspectives on whether recent intelligence activities may be impinging on important civil and human rights. As all of these selections suggest, creating an intelligence system that fits America s needs in the post Cold War period is one of the nation s biggest challenges. 19