Practitioner s Guide:



Similar documents
3000_115 Competency Standard: Certified Practitioner in Asset Management (CPAM)

Learning Aims: To research, record and evaluate the difficulties of starting your own business.

Guidelines for successful e-participation by young people

Service Management Simplified

Supply Chains in Agriculture: Joint Action of GIZ and the Private Sector

TOPdesk Professional. Service Management Simplified

GIZ in the CESEE Region

CLINICAL RESEARCH GENERIC TASK DESCRIPTIONS

The Contextualization of Project Management Practice and Best Practice

Use advanced techniques for summary and visualization of complex data for exploratory analysis and presentation.

Revised Policy Paper on Non-Formal Education: A Framework for indicating and assuring quality

Finding the Right People for Your Program Evaluation Team: Evaluator and Planning Team Job Descriptions

Membership Application Form Business and Biodiversity Initiative Biodiversity in Good Company

THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DIVERSITY

NHS WIRRAL / METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF WIRRAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH JOB DESCRIPTION. Joint Director of Public Health (Full Time/Job Share)

Glossary Monitoring and Evaluation Terms

GUIDELINES: Applying for your first IFS Individual Research Grant

Evidence-informed regulation The ACMA approach

Statement for the High Level Meeting on Disability and Development

Guideline: responsibilities for direction and delegation of care to enrolled nurses

MUSEUM VICTORIA ONLINE STRATEGY

OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT TOOLBOX GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY. Agreed by the IPCS International Technical Group on 28 May 2004

Evaluation Report. Pathways for Health Project (PHP)

Promoting the Development of Sustainable Energy Project, Azerbaijan

Effective Contract Management

Monitoring and Evaluation of. Interventions

How To Teach The Cambridge Philosophy Course

DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITY FRAMEWORK FOR THE MEDICARE BENEFITS SCHEDULE DISCUSSION PAPER

Kenya Health Initiative - Improving Basic Patient Safety Standards in Private and Public Health Sector Facilities

Chillventa The Green Cooling Initiative

CLINICAL GOVERNANCE POLICY

Evaluation Plan: Process Evaluation for Hypothetical AmeriCorps Program

Overarching MPH Degree Competencies

2008 review 2013 review Targeted measures Targeted deadline. ENQA Criterion / ESG. February 2016/ Measures already taken. Level of compliance

September IFAC Member Compliance Program Strategy,

A-LEVEL BUSINESS Paper 3 Specimen Assessment Material. Mark scheme

Partnership Satisfaction & Impact Survey

Contact Center Operations Manager

Terms of Reference. for. Human Resource Consultant

Guide for the Development of Results-based Management and Accountability Frameworks

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

Assessment Strategy for. Audit Practice, Tax Practice, Management Consulting Practice and Business Accounting Practice.

CALL FOR AN EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR THE CREATION OF A RESERVE LIST OF SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERTS ( SNEs ) WITHIN EUROJUST

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING AUTHORITY (VETA) UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

Risk Management. National Occupational Standards February 2014

ISSN EaSI performance in Executive summary of EaSI Performance Monitoring Report Social Europe

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Charter

URBACT III Programme Manual

Salzburg ii recommendations. EuroPEan universities achievements SincE 2005 in implementing the Salzburg PrinciPlES

Basic Entrepreneurial Skills Development

Grounded Theory. 1 Introduction Applications of grounded theory Outline of the design... 2

The Human Rights-Based Approach in German Development Cooperation Short version

MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis

URBACT III OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ( ) CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF 20 ACTION-PLANNING NETWORKS

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in Montenegro

Gender Strategy GENDER PAYS OFF!

Policy Paper on Non-Formal Education: A framework for indicating and assuring quality

Comment: Participation in School activities:

Pursuant to Convention No. 108 of the Council of Europe for the protection of persons with regard to the automated processing of personal data;

Project Dual Career: Determining needs for employment-related support among partners of Swiss transferable employees

BSBMKG408B Conduct market research

Guide on Developing a HRM Plan

Safe and Healthy Minnesota Students Planning and Evaluation Toolkit

INTOSAI. Performance Audit Subcommittee - PAS. Designing performance audits: setting the audit questions and criteria

Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas (PDP) Project No Job Vacancy Announcement for the position of

STRATEGIC REVIEW OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN UNICEF. Terms of Reference July

International Master on Public Administration and the Coordination of Transition (IMPACT)

How to gather and evaluate information

ASHP Professional Development Section Advisory Group. Professional Development Opportunities for Informatics Pharmacists

GIZ PRACTICAL CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT

QUAๆASSURANCE IN FINANCIAL AUDITING

Risk Sharing Models for Private Healthcare Insurance George Orros CEO, Universal Health Consultants

FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL WORK

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Dear Colleagues, Best Regards, Pamela L. Quinones, RDH, BS

International Evaluation of the PhD Programme of the Graduate School of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark

UCLA FIELDING SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. Competencies for Graduate Degree Programs

Human Resources Strategy for Researchers. Action Plan

VISION FOR LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT

MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY PUBLIC POLICY. Introduction

MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF HEALTH RESEARCH CAPACITY STRENGTHENING ACTIVITIES

Evaluating Actions and Measures Promoting Female Entrepreneurship. A Guide

Introduction to Higher Education Research and Development Two part-modules, each one a 2 ½ day intensive seminar (20 hours each)

Transcription:

GTZ Division 4300 Health, Education, Social Protection Jürgen Hohmann, Axel Weber, Christian Herzog and Bart Criel Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH METHODFINDER Practitioner s Guide: Health Insurance Evaluation Methodology and Information System - InfoSure Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung zero one two three four InfoSure Health Insurance Evaluation Methodology and Information System Data Entry Tool Version 1.2 (English, French, Spanish) Copyright: GTZ-Sectoral project Elaboration and Introduction of Social Concept and Layout: Nikolaus Schall / Michael Becker

Brief Description InfoSure is a methodological instrument for assessing and evaluating health insurance schemes, both on the community and national level as well as in comparison with others. The tool has been developed by the GTZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH) Sectoral project Elaboration and Introduction of Social Health Insurance Systems in Developing Countries in collaboration with the Institute for Tropical Medicine in Antwerp (ITG), Belgium, and the AOK Health Insurance Fund of Germany. InfoSure aims to support a detailed survey and structured analysis of the development, organisation and performance of health insurance systems. The methodology takes account of the complex nature of a health care and insurance system and the environment in which it is embedded. A comprehensive questionnaire covers almost all important aspects relative to a health insurance scheme. In this manner, the tool helps to understand the specific way in which the health insurance has developed. Moreover, key factors contributing to success or failure are likely to be identified. The information can be used to analyse single systems and to compare different schemes. As such, InfoSure is not only a Health Insurance Evaluation Methodology but also an information system. It can be used as a counselling instrument. Through its internet database, InfoSure provides world-wide access to comparable and well structured information from existing health insurance systems. The tool is designed to provide both, qualitative and quantitative information including statistical data. In addition, it is capable to generate reports and templates of reports in order to facilitate the assessment and comparison of health insurance schemes. The system is available in three languages (English, French and Spanish). Taking all these different functions into account, InfoSure is regarded as a best practice model for consultancy services. Method / Page 2

Proposed Main Users Experts in the field of health care provision and health insurance, development organisations, academics, health insurers and consultants are the main users of InfoSure. Purpose of the Method The InfoSure methodology is composed of three main parts: a qualitative questionnaire, a multiple choice questionnaire, and a statistical part. The set of questions offered can be used by the evaluators in the field as a guideline for their assessment or evaluation. It helps them to identify the essential aspects and inter-dependencies of a complex insurance system. The qualitative and the multiple-choice parts of the questionnaire contain identical questions and are purposefully repetitive. This dual structure makes it possible to check and revalidate the findings and the information gathered during the evaluation process. The multiple-choice part further allows to recognise and describe new aspects of an insurance projects and to classify them, which might also be subject to change. The result of both, the quantitative and qualitative assessment of a health insurance scheme is a detailed case study, which can later be accessed from the Internet. The structure of the InfoSure methodology produces text fragments composed of individual answers related to the questions, which can be freely combined as required. The Report and Analysis Tool assists in producing case study reports and comparative analysis. The researcher s specific field of interest can be nourished with the qualitative and quantitative data from selected studies. The combined information from different case studies can be used or modified in order to generate the intended report. As a structurally open tool, InfoSure can be up-dated and expanded iteratively to include other aspects of insurance or health financing, respectively. It is precisely the possibility to adapt the questionnaire over time to recent experiences and the evaluator s interest which makes this methodology a valuable scientific tool. Method / Page 3

Advantages The InfoSure product offers a wide range of opportunities for describing, evaluating, monitoring and comparing health insurance schemes. The web-based, multilingual database application: InfoSure provides you with a clearly structured questionnaire for collecting substantial quantitative and qualitative data (also available as PDF-File on the CD-ROM). InfoSure supports the design, implementation and survey of health insurance schemes as well as their continuous monitoring. InfoSure is a professional tool designed to measure the appropriateness of and accessibility to health care benefits, to encourage efficiency and quality control as well as to provide an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of insurance schemes. InfoSure supports consultancy and decision-making in health care financing and health insurance by improving evidence-based actions and advice. InfoSure allows world-wide access to a pool of expertise and exchange of practical and scientific experience amongst policymakers, administrators, insurance managers, stakeholders, academics, and more. InfoSure evaluation methodology and information system is suitable for many further purposes and can be adapted to explore a wide range of issues. Limitations The InfoSure evaluation methodology is a comprehensive tool, therefore the use of the instrument is time-consuming (a period of 10 days must be allocated for each evaluation). Evaluations ought to be conducted with a counterpart who is not only familiar with the concept of health insurance, but who knows the country and the people. If the management of a health insurance scheme is convinced to gain from the InfoSure application, it will be easier to carry out the evaluation. Business management data are often not available in smaller and less formalised health insurance schemes. Others might refuse to give access to internal data. Consultation of different stakeholders is needed in order to ensure that a multi-faceted picture of the insurance scheme is obtained. This is often difficult to achieve. Method / Page 4

Principles & General Procedures Structure and technique: The InfoSure methodology consists of three main parts: A qualitative questionnaire A coded multiple-choice questionnaire A statistical part. The choice of questions provided in the standard InfoSure package is intended to guide the evaluator in his/her interviews. Not every single question has to be addressed in an interview situation. The findings of the qualified interviews are entered into the tool, either as free text answers or categorized in the multiple-choice part. The qualitative part, with its sets of questions, explanations and possible answers, gives the evaluator the leeway to describe clearly the health insurance approach that has been taken. There is always the possibility to explore other aspects as well. The multiple-choice part offers a selection of possible answers to the questions posed in the qualitative part. These categories can be extended to suit individual requirements. The statistical part is intended for collection of financial and epidemiological data. Figure 1: Main steps and resulting products of InfoSure 1 2 3 Qualitative Questionnaire Coded Multiple Choice Questionnaire Statistical Questionnaire CASE STUDY Can be processed using the information system which is also available on the internet Analysis of health insurances Targeted Advisory and Support Services to the Insurance Agency Technical Solutions to Emerging Problems Method / Page 5

Principles & General Procedures The result of the evaluation process is a case study. The information in the qualitative part aims to give precise answers to the questions and sub-questions and, where necessary, compensate for limitations or gaps in the questionnaire. The multiple-choice part helps to classify and compare different health insurance schemes. The statistical part supplements quantitative data which have some bearing on the health insurance performance. The multilingual questionnaires are available in two forms: As printed version As software-based version. Both versions can be used by the evaluator to conduct the interviews with the management of an insurance scheme, stakeholders, beneficiaries, providers, and other groups of interest. The case study is entered into the InfoSure information system that can be accessed via Internet. This system allows processing, grouping and analysis of the collected information in a variety of ways. It is also possible to make editorial changes to the data entered, to modify the questionnaire, or to logically connect individual case studies. Content The main contents covered by the qualitative and multiple choice questionnaires are: Conditions at the time of starting the health insurance scheme, with the related problems that were encountered or supposed to be tackled. All relevant reference groups / persons involved in the planning and implementation and in providing the necessary support. Description of the beneficiaries: Definition of membership, the manner in which members are recruited and registered, the defined and actual benefits for the target group that is supposed to gain from the health insurance scheme. Financial aspects of a health insurance: Risk determination, calculation of contributions, contribution collection, level of copayments, financial management, support from other organisations. The benefit package: Covered and excluded benefits, reason why certain benefits have been excluded, included or extended, claim processing. Legal status of the scheme and the way it fits into the national health care policy. Method / Page 6

Principles & General Procedures Administration: How the health insurance scheme is set up and the workflow organised. Overview of the general health situation in the region and country, existing health care services, including quality aspects of the benefits offered. Contracting with multiple health care providers or an exclusive provider network. Level and method of provider payment. Functions of the state, including supervision and regulation of providers and insurers. Types of regulatory measures that have been invoked. Financial data, membership statistics, morbidity data, utilisation rates of different health care facilities, general demographic data (the gender and age-specific distribution of the membership data is particularly interesting). Procedure The information and data collection is supposed to be carried out by trained evaluators. The evaluation can be linked to consultancy services. Once a minimum number of data records have been entered, the comparative information may be used in order to identify interesting aspects for further investigation, advisory, or to prepare a publication. The case studies and reports can be published also on the InfoSure Website: www.infosure.org Exemplary fields of interest The following topics are of particular interest for the analysis: Solidarity mechanisms implemented in the health insurance scheme. To what extend the establishment of a health insurance scheme has actually improved access to health care services of the target group. The manner in which the health insurance scheme has changed the relationship between service providers and users (success or failure in strengthening patients interests). The political influence generated by local, regional or other health insurance schemes on the national health care strategy. Method / Page 7

References and Sources Used InfoSure Health Insurance Evaluation Methodology and Information System, Jürgen Hohmann, Axel Weber, Christian Herzog,, Bart Criel, GTZ, First Edition, 2002. Dr Jürgen Hohmann, Dr Bernd Schramm, Ms. Marion Baak: E-mail: gtz@bv.aok.de; infosure@gtz.de Internet: www.gtz.de; www.infosure.org Method / Page 8